SOCIAL MEDIA LAW
         It is Real and, Yes,
 Really Can Impact Your Business
                   Presented for

                   MENG
Marketing Executives Networking Group - Dallas
              November 9, 2012
I am a lawyer
       what I say today as well as the slide presentation are
        for educational purposes only and not intended to
        be legal advice and should not be relied on as such
       this does not create an attorney-client relationship
       why am I really happy about being here and what
        am I really trying to do?



www.brittontuma.com                                              2
3
1. Can I be sued for [x, y, or z]?   Yes!
     2. Is the risk of using social media worth it?




       Law + Social Media = Peaceful Coexistence
www.brittontuma.com                                   4
Today I want to:
           help find an acceptable balance

           educate you on risks of using social media, along with
            other digital business risks

           show you some ways to help minimize those risks

           Remember: social media is a tool – what you say and
            do is much like “real life”

           Use common sense!

           Of course use social media – but use it properly!
www.brittontuma.com                                                  5
WHAT IS
SOCIAL MEDIA LAW?




                    6
Social Media Law:
            The law that applies to and
            governs the use of social media.

                          (was that all you really wanted to know?)




www.brittontuma.com                                                   7
Social Media Law:
         inherent risks
         natural tension between promoters v. risk
          management in business
         BUT!!!
         I am “sold out” on social media and an avid
          user … and I don’t want to get sued either …

www.brittontuma.com                                      8
2 General Types of Law

             Codes: legislatures create specific laws to
              address specific problems

             Common Law: judges look to general
              principles of law and, by using reason,
              apply those principles to resolve
              previously unforeseen problems
www.brittontuma.com                                         9
Legislatures want to keep up
              impossible
              speed technology is evolving
              speed culture and business environment changing
              legislature too slow
                    example:
                        • last spring the big ruckus was prospective
                            employers asking for social media logins –
                            the massive public outcry made it such
                            that nobody in their right mind would do
                            that now
                        • Aug 2012: Illinois became one of 2 states
                            to enact a law to prohibit (eff. date: 1/1/13)

www.brittontuma.com                                                          10
www.brittontuma.com   11
Look to Common Law
             contract law
             intellectual property law
             torts – defamation
             regulatory law
             employment law
             evidence law

www.brittontuma.com                       12
You can’t protect against what you
            don’t know, so let’s apply this “law
                stuff” to the real world …




www.brittontuma.com                                13
Who uses social media for marketing?
             do you want to give your marketing efforts to
              your competitor?
             who really owns your account
             followers / connections?
             “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of
              cure”: PhoneDog v. Kravitz
             each service or site has a contract
             contract law
www.brittontuma.com                                           14
Who has trade secrets, confidential and
        proprietary information?
             do you want to tell your competitors?
             customer / vendor lists
                     who are you talking to or following?

             secret business alliances, strategies, plans
             business situational awareness
             intellectual property law


www.brittontuma.com                                          15
Who wants to get sued?
             infringement of trademark
             right to publicity
                   name, voice, signature, photo, likeness (statutory after death)
                   common law while living if for value
                   commercial v. educational or newsworthy
                   audience picture v. company promo video
             infringement of copyright
                   attribution isn’t always enough
                   DMCA Takedown Request
                   Google now penalizes for too many
                must have a license or use creative commons
                intellectual property law
www.brittontuma.com                                                                   16
Copyright Example


                                                                     License:
                                                                Creative Commons
                                                                  Attribution 3.0




       Attribution: prthugp @ http://www.officialpsds.com/prthugp-Profile9747.html
www.brittontuma.com                                                                  17
Who wants to get sued some more?
             what you (and your employees) say can hurt you!


                    Bland v. Roberts – “Like” case
                     tortious interference
                     defamation (libel, slander, bus. defamation)
                     false advertising & false warranties
                     fraud & negligent misrepresentation
                     online impersonation
                     harassment and cyber-bullying
                     “puffery” of facts
www.brittontuma.com                                                  18
Who wants to get investigated by the
        Feds?
               FTC – Investigated Hyundai for not disclosing incentives
                given to bloggers for endorsements.
                     Google recently. (Fed. Ct. in Oracle v. Google)
               HHS & OCR – could have investigated hospital worker who
                posted patient “PHI” on Facebook (“Funny, but this patient
                came in to cure her VD and get birth control.”)
               SEC – false statements in raising funds (SEC v. Imperia
                Invest. IBC) or insider information  “Board meeting.
                Good numbers=Happy Board.” before official release
               regulatory law
www.brittontuma.com                                                          19
What are some real trouble spots?
             Employment issues – next section
             Giveaways and contests can be trouble for many
              reasons – do not do them on social media
              without having it thoroughly vetted
                     many sites’ TOS prohibit
                     jurisdiction gambling and contest rules
             Have you read Facebook’s Page Terms?
                (https://www.facebook.com/24hfcastlehills/posts/403914059658181)




www.brittontuma.com                                                                20
www.brittontuma.com   21
What if someone is talking bad
  about your business on social
  media?
       defamation rules apply online
       but … be careful
       the “Streisand Effect”  Dallas
        law firm
       anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits
        Against Public Participation)

www.brittontuma.com                       22
Guess what will be used against you?
             social media is evidence – very powerful evidence!
             electronically stored information (“ESI”) is becoming
              the most useful form of evidence in virtually every
              kind of lawsuit and investigation
             we now have complete records of 2-way
              communication stream – like all calls recorded!
             you don’t “own” your tweets! (“If you post a tweet, just like
                if you scream it out the window, there is no reasonable
                expectation of privacy.” State of N.Y. v. Harris)

             4th Am. ≠ protect Facebook posts (U.S. v. Meregildon,
                Aug. 10, 2012)

www.brittontuma.com                                                           23
MINIMIZING THE
 RISKS OF SOCIAL
MEDIA IN BUSINESS




                    24
Monitor, Regulate & Archive SM
              Necessary if regulated industry
                     finance, insurance, energy &
                      utilities, healthcare, government, legal

              Wise for others
              Products
                     Barracuda Web Filter
                     DataSift
                     Actiance

www.brittontuma.com                                              25
In general you want to
              recognize and appreciate potential issues
              decide how to handle those issues
              educate your team on those issues
              collaborate and train on how to comply with and
               resolve issues
              create and outline procedures for using social
               media
              monitor (to some degree) to ensure compliance
www.brittontuma.com                                              26
Social media policies are a “must have”
                ounce of prevention: less than 1 day of litigation
                if have, must enforce
                trying to predict issues – but evolving – can’t get all
                contractually resolve issues such as ownership and
                 authority
                great opportunity to set rules and document expectations
                greater opportunity to explain and ensure understanding
                 of expectations
                put on notice of monitoring – and actually monitor!
                should address employment issues


www.brittontuma.com                                                         27
Employment Issues
             using social media in hiring
                 best to have set criteria with neutral third
                  party investigate for criteria
                 not use to discriminate
                         e.g., snooping to find race, gender, age, disability,
                          pregnancy
                         e.g., search for candidates on Twitter where
                          disproportionate number of people <40 yrs. on Twitter,
                          may violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

                 requesting social media login information
www.brittontuma.com                                                                28
Employment Issues
             using personal social media during work
                     can be prohibited
                     may prohibit using or disclosing company IP for
                      personal SM
                     may prohibit using company info for setting up
                      personal SM accounts




www.brittontuma.com                                                     29
You need social media policies but the National
        Labor Relations Board is making it difficult
               NLRB jurisdiction = impacts interstate commerce
               National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) sec. 7 gives employees
                right to engage in “concerted activities for the purpose of …
                mutual aid and protection”
               NLRB finds illegal any policy provision that (a) restricts or (b)
                an employee would reasonably construe to chill concerted
                activities
               On 5/30/12 NLRB General Counsel issued its 3rd Report on
                Social Media Policies in 1 year period (8/11 & 1/12)
               9/7/12 First NLRB Ruling; 9/20/12 first NLRB Admin.L.J.
www.brittontuma.com                                                                 30
Can you guess who the NLRB is pulling for?
             making it very difficult for businesses to protect
              themselves
             social media policies must now be carefully tailored
              to
                     address unique business and legal needs of your business
                     be enforceable and lawful in a court of law
                     be legal in the eyes of the NLRB
             Examples of provisions found illegal by NLRB


www.brittontuma.com                                                              31
www.brittontuma.com   32
www.brittontuma.com   33
www.brittontuma.com   34
What is the NLRB really looking for?
             clarity and precision
             examples of do’s and don’ts that give
              context and real-life meaning to the rules




www.brittontuma.com                                        35
Cyber Insurance
               If you are doing anything in cyberspace, you need it.
                Period.
               Most traditional insurance does not cover cyber-events,
                even if you think it does (really!)
               Cyber-Insurance is relatively inexpensive
               Most policies come include a cyber-risk audit before the
                policies are underwritten
               Policies can cover social media risk, computer fraud risk,
                and data breach / hacking risk



www.brittontuma.com                                                          36
 social media is wonderful!
             must find proper balance
             need a social media policy
                     address unique business and legal needs of your business
                     be enforceable and lawful in a court of law
                     be legal in the eyes of the NLRB
             need to enforce social media policy
             need to spend time with employees to help them
              understand and possibly collaborate on the rules
             need to look at cyber-insurance!
www.brittontuma.com                                                              37
www.brittontuma.com   38

Social Media Law - Marketing Executives Networking Group (MENG)

  • 1.
    SOCIAL MEDIA LAW It is Real and, Yes, Really Can Impact Your Business Presented for MENG Marketing Executives Networking Group - Dallas November 9, 2012
  • 2.
    I am alawyer  what I say today as well as the slide presentation are for educational purposes only and not intended to be legal advice and should not be relied on as such  this does not create an attorney-client relationship  why am I really happy about being here and what am I really trying to do? www.brittontuma.com 2
  • 3.
  • 4.
    1. Can Ibe sued for [x, y, or z]? Yes! 2. Is the risk of using social media worth it? Law + Social Media = Peaceful Coexistence www.brittontuma.com 4
  • 5.
    Today I wantto:  help find an acceptable balance  educate you on risks of using social media, along with other digital business risks  show you some ways to help minimize those risks  Remember: social media is a tool – what you say and do is much like “real life”  Use common sense!  Of course use social media – but use it properly! www.brittontuma.com 5
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Social Media Law: The law that applies to and governs the use of social media. (was that all you really wanted to know?) www.brittontuma.com 7
  • 8.
    Social Media Law:  inherent risks  natural tension between promoters v. risk management in business  BUT!!!  I am “sold out” on social media and an avid user … and I don’t want to get sued either … www.brittontuma.com 8
  • 9.
    2 General Typesof Law  Codes: legislatures create specific laws to address specific problems  Common Law: judges look to general principles of law and, by using reason, apply those principles to resolve previously unforeseen problems www.brittontuma.com 9
  • 10.
    Legislatures want tokeep up  impossible  speed technology is evolving  speed culture and business environment changing  legislature too slow example: • last spring the big ruckus was prospective employers asking for social media logins – the massive public outcry made it such that nobody in their right mind would do that now • Aug 2012: Illinois became one of 2 states to enact a law to prohibit (eff. date: 1/1/13) www.brittontuma.com 10
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Look to CommonLaw  contract law  intellectual property law  torts – defamation  regulatory law  employment law  evidence law www.brittontuma.com 12
  • 13.
    You can’t protectagainst what you don’t know, so let’s apply this “law stuff” to the real world … www.brittontuma.com 13
  • 14.
    Who uses socialmedia for marketing?  do you want to give your marketing efforts to your competitor?  who really owns your account  followers / connections?  “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”: PhoneDog v. Kravitz  each service or site has a contract  contract law www.brittontuma.com 14
  • 15.
    Who has tradesecrets, confidential and proprietary information?  do you want to tell your competitors?  customer / vendor lists  who are you talking to or following?  secret business alliances, strategies, plans  business situational awareness  intellectual property law www.brittontuma.com 15
  • 16.
    Who wants toget sued?  infringement of trademark  right to publicity  name, voice, signature, photo, likeness (statutory after death)  common law while living if for value  commercial v. educational or newsworthy  audience picture v. company promo video  infringement of copyright  attribution isn’t always enough  DMCA Takedown Request  Google now penalizes for too many  must have a license or use creative commons  intellectual property law www.brittontuma.com 16
  • 17.
    Copyright Example License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Attribution: prthugp @ http://www.officialpsds.com/prthugp-Profile9747.html www.brittontuma.com 17
  • 18.
    Who wants toget sued some more?  what you (and your employees) say can hurt you! Bland v. Roberts – “Like” case  tortious interference  defamation (libel, slander, bus. defamation)  false advertising & false warranties  fraud & negligent misrepresentation  online impersonation  harassment and cyber-bullying  “puffery” of facts www.brittontuma.com 18
  • 19.
    Who wants toget investigated by the Feds?  FTC – Investigated Hyundai for not disclosing incentives given to bloggers for endorsements.  Google recently. (Fed. Ct. in Oracle v. Google)  HHS & OCR – could have investigated hospital worker who posted patient “PHI” on Facebook (“Funny, but this patient came in to cure her VD and get birth control.”)  SEC – false statements in raising funds (SEC v. Imperia Invest. IBC) or insider information  “Board meeting. Good numbers=Happy Board.” before official release  regulatory law www.brittontuma.com 19
  • 20.
    What are somereal trouble spots?  Employment issues – next section  Giveaways and contests can be trouble for many reasons – do not do them on social media without having it thoroughly vetted  many sites’ TOS prohibit  jurisdiction gambling and contest rules  Have you read Facebook’s Page Terms? (https://www.facebook.com/24hfcastlehills/posts/403914059658181) www.brittontuma.com 20
  • 21.
  • 22.
    What if someoneis talking bad about your business on social media?  defamation rules apply online  but … be careful  the “Streisand Effect”  Dallas law firm  anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) www.brittontuma.com 22
  • 23.
    Guess what willbe used against you?  social media is evidence – very powerful evidence!  electronically stored information (“ESI”) is becoming the most useful form of evidence in virtually every kind of lawsuit and investigation  we now have complete records of 2-way communication stream – like all calls recorded!  you don’t “own” your tweets! (“If you post a tweet, just like if you scream it out the window, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.” State of N.Y. v. Harris)  4th Am. ≠ protect Facebook posts (U.S. v. Meregildon, Aug. 10, 2012) www.brittontuma.com 23
  • 24.
    MINIMIZING THE RISKSOF SOCIAL MEDIA IN BUSINESS 24
  • 25.
    Monitor, Regulate &Archive SM  Necessary if regulated industry  finance, insurance, energy & utilities, healthcare, government, legal  Wise for others  Products  Barracuda Web Filter  DataSift  Actiance www.brittontuma.com 25
  • 26.
    In general youwant to  recognize and appreciate potential issues  decide how to handle those issues  educate your team on those issues  collaborate and train on how to comply with and resolve issues  create and outline procedures for using social media  monitor (to some degree) to ensure compliance www.brittontuma.com 26
  • 27.
    Social media policiesare a “must have”  ounce of prevention: less than 1 day of litigation  if have, must enforce  trying to predict issues – but evolving – can’t get all  contractually resolve issues such as ownership and authority  great opportunity to set rules and document expectations  greater opportunity to explain and ensure understanding of expectations  put on notice of monitoring – and actually monitor!  should address employment issues www.brittontuma.com 27
  • 28.
    Employment Issues  using social media in hiring  best to have set criteria with neutral third party investigate for criteria  not use to discriminate  e.g., snooping to find race, gender, age, disability, pregnancy  e.g., search for candidates on Twitter where disproportionate number of people <40 yrs. on Twitter, may violate the Age Discrimination in Employment Act  requesting social media login information www.brittontuma.com 28
  • 29.
    Employment Issues  using personal social media during work  can be prohibited  may prohibit using or disclosing company IP for personal SM  may prohibit using company info for setting up personal SM accounts www.brittontuma.com 29
  • 30.
    You need socialmedia policies but the National Labor Relations Board is making it difficult  NLRB jurisdiction = impacts interstate commerce  National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) sec. 7 gives employees right to engage in “concerted activities for the purpose of … mutual aid and protection”  NLRB finds illegal any policy provision that (a) restricts or (b) an employee would reasonably construe to chill concerted activities  On 5/30/12 NLRB General Counsel issued its 3rd Report on Social Media Policies in 1 year period (8/11 & 1/12)  9/7/12 First NLRB Ruling; 9/20/12 first NLRB Admin.L.J. www.brittontuma.com 30
  • 31.
    Can you guesswho the NLRB is pulling for?  making it very difficult for businesses to protect themselves  social media policies must now be carefully tailored to  address unique business and legal needs of your business  be enforceable and lawful in a court of law  be legal in the eyes of the NLRB  Examples of provisions found illegal by NLRB www.brittontuma.com 31
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
    What is theNLRB really looking for?  clarity and precision  examples of do’s and don’ts that give context and real-life meaning to the rules www.brittontuma.com 35
  • 36.
    Cyber Insurance  If you are doing anything in cyberspace, you need it. Period.  Most traditional insurance does not cover cyber-events, even if you think it does (really!)  Cyber-Insurance is relatively inexpensive  Most policies come include a cyber-risk audit before the policies are underwritten  Policies can cover social media risk, computer fraud risk, and data breach / hacking risk www.brittontuma.com 36
  • 37.
     social mediais wonderful!  must find proper balance  need a social media policy  address unique business and legal needs of your business  be enforceable and lawful in a court of law  be legal in the eyes of the NLRB  need to enforce social media policy  need to spend time with employees to help them understand and possibly collaborate on the rules  need to look at cyber-insurance! www.brittontuma.com 37
  • 38.