Developing a Technology Rich Teacher Education Program
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•300 views
This slide show was presented in Denver, CO at the Online Learning Conference in July 2014
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Developing a Technology Rich Teacher Education Program
Similar to Developing a Technology Rich Teacher Education Program (20)
More from Noreen Barajas-Murphy
More from Noreen Barajas-Murphy (8)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Developing a Technology Rich Teacher Education Program
- 1. Developing a Technology Rich Teacher Education Program: Use of Data to Inform Instruction Dr. Donna Redman Nori Barajas-Murphy, M.Ed. University of La Verne
- 2. UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE
- 3. Demographics The University of La Verne is a Carnegie doctoral/Research University in Southern California enrolling over 8,000 students in four colleges over 11 campuses. The College of Education & Organizational Leadership (CEOL) A leader in preparation of professional educators and administrators.
- 4. Community College Grant Partner Citrus Community College total enrollment of 13,184 Citrus Community College serves five unified school districts
- 6. Title V Grant: Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers Today Through Technology 1. To improve the technology literacy of future educatory by modeling exemplary use of learning technologies in their teacher preparation program 2. Improve program completion and graduation rates of future teachers from community college to 4-year college
- 7. DATA USED TO INFORM REDESIGN & FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
- 8. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 9. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 10. ECAR data informed the initial redesign process
- 15. Initial Conclusions - 2012 We believe mobile devices and tablets will increase in the near future and want to leverage that medium in course redesign (Horizon Report 2012) Our students believe the goals of the grant to be valid – technology helps students achieve course learning outcomes Our students own the equipment needed to access online resources – and want these resources available in the LMS
- 16. ECAR data informed the ongoing redesign process
- 22. La Verne ECAR Key Findings - 2013 Online course components perceived as a slightly more effective learning environment but few LV students had options to take blended courses Increase ownership of variety of devices particularly smart phone The ownership vs. use data point shows students are interested in leveraging tablet and laptop Instructors and faculty need more learning technology skills to support instruction and academic success LMS is still perceived as important Our students own several internet connected devices that are not leveraged in their courses Technology is still perceived by many to support academic success yet down from 74% prior year eBooks & ePortfolios still not rating highly Lecture capture or screencasting and online collaboration tools are valued
- 23. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 24. Project Tomorrow: Speak Up The New Digital Learning Playbook – June 2014 • 325,279 K‐12 students • 32,151 parents • 37,756 teachers • 2,230 librarians • 933 district administrators • 3,020 school administrators • 577 technology leaders • 1,346 members of the community • 9,005 public and private schools from • 2,710 districts
- 25. Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Learning in the 21st Century: Digital Experiences and Expectations of Tomorrow’s Teachers – February 7, 2013 1,351 college students completed the online Speak Up survey. Key characteristics of this convenience sampling include: • 75 % were enrolled in undergraduate teacher preparation programs • 25 % in post undergraduate programs either leading to a graduate level degree or to a teacher certificate or credential • 41 % were aspiring for a multi-subject teacher credential • 46 % for a single subject teacher credential
- 26. Speak Up 2013 Key Findings Aspiring teachers place a high value on the role of technology to both impact student academic success and their own effectiveness as a teacher. In spite of their comfort with using technology tools, the aspiring teachers say that their field experiences as student teachers and observing their professors are the best way for them to learn about how to integrate technology within instruction. La Verne Liberal Studies students participated this year in the 2014 Aspiring Teacher Survey
- 27. Principal’s Expectations vs. Aspiring Teacher Experience Disparity
- 28. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 29. University Wide Course Evaluations Quantitative 10 Questions 4 point Likert scale Qualitative 4 Questions
- 30. Quantitative Evaluation Questions • The course materials helped me achieve the course objectives • The course assignments helped me achieve the course objectives • The instructor’s teaching techniques helped my learn the subject matter • The instructor was respectful of diversity among students • The class environment was conducive to my learning • The instructor supported and encouraged student questions and discussion, in class or online • Feedback on my coursework was provided in a timely manner • Feedback on my coursework was helpful • The instructor was accessible, either in person, by telephone or through online communication channels. • Overall the instructor was effective in the course
- 31. Qualitative Data Questions: 1. What were the instructor’s most satisfactory teaching attributes? 2. What could the instructor do to improve his/her teaching effectiveness? 3. What were the most satisfactory aspects of this course? 4. How could this course be improved?
- 32. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 33. PT5 Course Outcome Surveys The degree to which I could have competently met this learning outcome BEFORE taking this course. The degree to which the course materials and activities in (course) helped me meet the following learning outcome Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree 1 2 3 4
- 34. Impact of Course Redesign Writing for Educators Foundation Course Art for Elementary Educators Liberal Studies Lesson Plan Resource Liberal Studies ePortfolio Resource Physical Education for Elementary Educators Early Childhood Development
- 35. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 36. Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data • To what degree did the course learning outcome data influence your teaching practices? • To what degree did the ECAR data influence your teaching practices? • To what degree did the faculty development events influence your teaching practices?
- 37. ECAR Data + Course LO Data To what degree did the course learning outcome data influence your teaching practices? 3.60 I have modified my instructional approach(es) based on the 2012 data set. 3.14 I have modified my instructional approach(es) based on the 2013 data set. 3.05
- 38. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 39. Lead Instructor Role Specialists for each Liberal Studies course: oversee content, delivery and training for all other instructors Grant related meetings: Annual each Spring • 2012 to review and revise all course outcomes • 2013 to review and revise and align all course assessments • 2014 to reflect on data and faculty development
- 40. Liberal Studies Lead Focus Group 1. In what ways do you use data to inform course content and instructional design 2. In what ways do you use faculty development to inform course content and instructional design
- 41. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • Course Evaluations • Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 42. COURSE DESIGN
- 43. Year One Redesign • Redesigned all presentations • Lecture captured all course topics and located on a streaming server • Created SoftChalk SCORM compliant lessons w/ embedded lecture • Created and embedded self checking quizzes during each topic • Assessments aligned more closely with course learning outcomes • Instructor feedback models online “Office Hour” using screencast grading Writing for Educators Foundation Course
- 44. Screencasting is used widely by instructors and students in all courses LMS is the central location for all coursework in program Device use is encouraged and course content is increasingly mobile friendly Liberal Studies courses are all offered in the blended format; 7 of the 11 required courses are offered 100% online eBooks & ePortfolios are being consistently and intentionally infused program wide Year One Redesign Writing for Educators Foundation Course
- 45. Year Two Redesign 1. Course iBook 2. Class activities aligned and balanced for continuity 3. Course materials (slide shows, web modules, LMS) designed with consistent look and navigation Art for Elementary Educators
- 46. Year Two Redesign Art for Elementary Educators LMS is the central location for all coursework in program eBooks & ePortfolios are being consistently and intentionally infused program wide Liberal Studies courses are all offered in the blended format; 7 of the 11 required courses are offered 100% online
- 47. Year Three Redesign 1. Program alignment + Capstone Rubric 2. Course level artifacts, achievements, and reflections 3. How-To manual Liberal Studies ePortfolio Resource Amazon Appstore Google Play Store Apple App Store PDF HTML
- 48. Year Three Redesign Liberal Studies Lesson Plan Resource 1. Program alignment 2. Examples of key indicators 3. Guided practice using assessment rubric 4. How-To manual
- 49. La Verne Redesign Device use is encouraged and course content is increasingly mobile friendly Ongoing, sustained support of consistent learning technology skills is offered to all Liberal Studies faculty and instructors eBooks & ePortfolios are being consistently and intentionally infused program wide
- 50. Year Three Redesign 1. Learning Outcomes revised and aligned with course assessments 2. Diagnostic App integration into introductory unit 3. Lesson Plan resource customized for PE education and for program continuity 4. Project based capstone assessment Physical Education for Elementary Educators
- 51. La Verne Redesign Problem based learning is the course arc ~ students will create a PE unit to solve a K-8 teaching scenario Diagnostic app integration and modeling throughout course Technology is still perceived by many to support academic Screencasting is used widely by instructors and students in all courses LMS is the central location for all coursework in program Device use is encouraged and course content is increasingly mobile friendly Ongoing, sustained support of consistent learning technology skills is offered to all Liberal Studies faculty and instructors eBooks & ePortfolios are being consistently and intentionally infused program wide Integration and modeling of device in PE education and teaching
- 52. Year Three Redesign 1. Practicum resource for observation unit Early Childhood Development
- 54. Annual Liberal Studies Meeting Blend of updates, data, and faculty development
- 55. Liberal Studies Annual Meetings Goals: • ECAR Data + Course learning outcomes data + Aspiring data • Screencasting • ePortfolio
- 56. To what degree have your incorporated screencasting as an instructor? 3.6868% Significantly Faculty Development To what degree have you assigned and assessed an item for the Liberal Studies ePortfolio? To what degree have you integrated screencasting into student assignments? 2.72 3.00
- 57. LEARNING TECHNOLOGY COURSE SUPPORT OF STUDENT PROFICIENCY
- 58. EDUC407 Requirements • Screencasting – Teaching concepts, rich media development, reflection • Video Channel – Student produced playlists and streaming content • Site development – digital presence, ePortfolio, lesson planning content
- 60. • ECAR Study of Students and Technology • Project Tomorrow: Speak Up Aspiring Educators • University of La Verne Course Evaluations • Liberal Studies Learning Outcome Surveys • Liberal Studies Faculty Use of Data Instrument • Liberal Studies Lead Faculty Focus Group
- 61. 61 Questions?
- 62. Developing a Technology Rich Teacher Education Program: Use of Data to Inform Instruction dredman@laverne.edu nbarajas-murphy@laverne.edu
Editor's Notes
- ULV: The University of La Verne is a Carnegie doctoral/Research University in Southern California enrolling over 8,000 students in four colleges: the College of Arts and Science, the College of Business & Public Management, the College of Education & Organizational Leadership, & the college of Law. The University has nine regional campuses in central and southern California. The university is accredited by Accrediting Commission for Senior Colleges and Universities of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges. CEOL: provides a broad range of programs to prepare professional educators in a number of specialties including child development, elementary and secondary teaching, special education, pupil personnel services, school psychology, reading, child life, and educational and organizational leadership. Because of its long and rich tradition of excellence, the University of La Verne is recognized as one of the leading institutions engaged in the preparation of professional educators and leaders in Southern California. Accredited by NCATE and CCTC.
- Title V HSI Co-Op Grant - partner with University of La Verne - prepare underrepresented students to enter the teaching profession. With Citrus as the lead institution, the two colleges share the grant and have formed a program designed to prepare the next generation of K-12 teachers. The partnership builds on the shared strengths and values of the two colleges, which are Hispanic Serving Institutions. The collaboration between Citrus College and the University of La Verne has provided a critically needed and highly effective academic pathway that will prepare many Hispanic and other underrepresented students to become teachers. As such, the program is a high priority for both institutions. Visit the Center for Teacher Excellence website. Celebrating over 90 years of service, Citrus College is located in Glendora in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, approximately twenty-five miles northeast of metropolitan Los Angeles. The college has the distinction of being the oldest community college in Los Angeles County and the fifth oldest In the state Crrently serves 11,000 students
- Courses in the program are designed to enhance student competencies in the following areas: designing multiple subject curriculum and delivery at the P-6 level; demonstrating a comprehensive understanding of social issues and capability to teach culturally and linguistically diverse learners; understanding technology for use as a future teacher; and, preparing multiple subject teacher candidates for the state exam, the California Subject Exam for Teachers (CSET). The program serves to bridge the sequential process of becoming a teacher for Liberal Studies students through continuous communication and cooperation with the Teacher Credential Program.
- “(Solve)…the issue of poor student success [as evidenced] in teacher education completion rates and inadequate technology integration by faculty, and inadequate student technology literacy, emerged as one of the top priorities.” Grant Proposal An instructional design team has worked in partnership with Faculty Content Experts to redesign courses to include interactive mobile content, and technology and media rich
- Initial data used to inform redesign
- Initially, this data showed: Our students own laptops Most believe using learning tech will benefit their education Printers?
- Many believe their instructors have adequate skills, and use learning tech effectively Only 42% believe instructors provide enough modeling or training within a course More use of LMS
- ePortfolios + eBooks are not yet a priority Previous slide shows LMS and availability of course materials is a priority
- An interesting result~ Social media has continued to be of little interest to our students Again, LMS is important to many students
- Our student DO own equipment Students want resources available in the LMS Technology facilitates learning Horizon report – significant finding in 2012 that we included as we began redesign
- Increase ownership of variety of devices particularly smart phone The ownership vs use data point shows students are interested in leveraging tablet and laptop ECAR varied question to expand beyond ownership to the USE of the device for academic purposes
- Technology is still perceived by many as to support academic success yet down from 74% prior year ONLINE course components perceived as a slightly more effective learning environment but few had options to take blended courses Instructors and faculty need more learning technology to support instruction and academic success
- LMS is still perceived as important Lecture capture or screencasting and online collaboration tools are valued eBooks & ePortfolios still not rating highly
- Our students own several internet connected devices that are not leveraged in their courses
- 2012 data New 2013 data Aspring questions
- 2012 data New 2013 data Aspring questions
- Return to this when discussing 407
- Our focus group determined that course evaluations were the least valuable source of data. These evaluations do not address course content and students opinion of how much they learned. There is limited focus on learning outcomes. More focus on teaching strategies and environment Used heavily for tenure and promotion
- Quantitative Date Questions: Likert Ratings: 1-4 The course materials helped me achieve the course objectives The course assignments helped me achieve the course objectives The instructor’s teaching techniques helped my learn the subject matter The instructor was respectful of diversity among students The class environment was conducive to my learning The instructor supported and encouraged student questions and discussion, in class or online Feedback on my coursework was provided in a timely manner Feedback on my coursework was helpful The instructor was accessible, either in person, by telephone or through online communication channels. Overall the instructor was effective in the course Qualitative Date Questions: What were the instructor’s most satisfactory teaching attributes? What could the instructor do to improve his/her teaching effectiveness? What were the most satisfactory aspects of this course? How could this course be improved/
- Nori
- Lead faculty are specialists in each course. They oversee content, delivery and training to teach the course. Lead faculty meetings are held two times a year.
- All lead faculty expressed a need to incorporate more technology into their courses, based on the Ear and Learning outcomes data. More use of screencasting, software such as Skagit and Camtasia, video everywhere, and YouTube were incorporated into the courses, by both then instructors and student use. Faculty development also played a large part in it. As lead
- Full redesign – course was a patch work of borrowed materials Redesigned all presentations Lecture captured (Produced Camtasia) all course topics and located on a streaming server Created SoftChalk SCORM compliant lessons w/ embedded lecture Created and embedded self checking quizzes during each topic Assessments aligned more closely with course learning outcomes
- Screencasting and lecture capture LMS Streamed lectures on mobile device iBook authored as a companion course text
- Flipped class – defined by instructor, readings prior, activities during Resources more consistently organized in LMS
- Flipped class – defined by instructor, readings prior, activities during Resources more consistently organized in LMS iBook available with questions from course text
- Conversations about courses resulted in a deficit program wide on two items: ePortfolio + Lesson Planning We shifted to a platform agnostic outcome using Adobe Design + eLearning Suite How-To resources for program consistency and better faculty support
- How to guide with exemplars given in relation to rubric
- Resources are available for mobile devices, in the LMS and onlline as an html file or a PDF
- To support student use and creation of rich media – EDUC407 is a required course