Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Org structure
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Org structure

3,311

Published on

Published in: Business
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,311
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
121
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • High task variety and low analyzability present many unique problems to managers. Flexible structure works best in these conditions. Low task variety and high analyzability allow managers to rely on established procedures.
  • Managers can select the best structure for a particular division —o ne division may use a functional structure, another division may have a geographic structure. The ability to break a large organization into smaller units makes it easier to manage.
  • Transcript

    • 1. chapter ten Managing Organizational Structure and CultureMcGraw-Hill/IrwinContemporary Management, 5/e Copyright © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
    • 2. Organizational Structure• Organizational Architecture – The organizational structure, control systems, culture, and human resource management systems that together determine how efficiently and effectively organizational resources are used. 10-3
    • 3. Designing Organizational Structure• Organizing – The process by which managers establish working relationships among employees to achieve goals.• Organizational Structure – Formal system of task and reporting relationships showing how workers use resources. 10-4
    • 4. Designing Organizational Structure• Organizational design – The process by which managers create a specific type of organizational structure and culture so that a company can operate in the most efficient and effective way 10-5
    • 5. Factors Affecting Organizational Structure Figure 10.1 10-6
    • 6. The Organizational EnvironmentThe Organizational Environment – The quicker the environment changes, the more problems face managers. – Structure must be more flexible (i.e., decentralized authority) when environmental change is rapid. 10-7
    • 7. The Organizational EnvironmentStrategy – Different strategies require the use of different structures. • A differentiation strategy needs a flexible structure, low cost may need a more formal structure. • Increased vertical integration or diversification also requires a more flexible structure. 10-8
    • 8. The Organizational EnvironmentTechnology – The combination of skills, knowledge, tools, equipment, computers and machines used in the organization. – More complex technology makes it harder for managers to regulate the organization. 10-9
    • 9. The Organizational EnvironmentTechnology – Technology can be measured by: • Task variety: the number of new problems a manager encounters. • Task analyzability: the availability of programmed solutions to a manager to solve problems. 10-10
    • 10. The Organizational EnvironmentHuman Resources – Highly skilled workers whose jobs require working in teams usually need a more flexible structure. – Higher skilled workers often have internalized professional norms and values. 10-11
    • 11. The Organizational Environment• Human Resources – Managers must take into account all four factors (environment, strategy, technology and human resources) when designing the structure of the organization. 10-12
    • 12. The Organizational EnvironmentThe way an organization’s structure works depends on the choices managers make about:2. How to group tasks into individual jobs3. How to group jobs into functions and divisions4. How to allocate authority and coordinate functions and divisions 10-13
    • 13. Grouping Jobs into Functions• Function – Group of people, working together, who possess similar skills or use the same kind of knowledge, tools, or techniques to perform their jobs 10-14
    • 14. Grouping Jobs into Functions• Functional Structure – An organizational structure composed of all the departments that an organization requires to produce its goods or services. 10-15
    • 15. Functional Structure• Advantages – Encourages learning from others doing similar jobs. – Easy for managers to monitor and evaluate workers. – Allows managers to create the set of functions they need in order to scan and monitor the competitive environment 10-16
    • 16. Functional Structure• Disadvantages – Difficult for departments to communicate with others. – Preoccupation with own department and losing sight of organizational goals. 10-17
    • 17. TheFunctionalStructure of Pier 1 ImportsFigure10.3 10-18
    • 18. Divisional Structures• Divisional Structure – Managers create a series of business units to produce a specific kind of product for a specific kind of customer 10-19
    • 19. Product,Market, andGeographicStructuresFigure 10.4 10-20
    • 20. Types of Divisional Structures• Product Structure – Managers place each distinct product line or business in its own self-contained division – Divisional managers have the responsibility for devising an appropriate business-level strategy to allow the division to compete effectively in its industry 10-21
    • 21. Product Structure• Allows functional managers to specialize in one product area• Division managers become experts in their area• Removes need for direct supervision of division by corporate managers• Divisional management improves the use of resources 10-22
    • 22. Types of Divisional Structures• Geographic Structure – Divisions are broken down by geographic location• Global geographic structure – Managers locate different divisions in each of the world regions where the organization operates. – Generally, occurs when managers are pursuing a multi-domestic strategy 10-23
    • 23. Types of Divisional Structures• Global Product Structure – Each product division takes responsibility for deciding where to manufacture its products and how to market them in foreign countries worldwide 10-24
    • 24. Global Geographic and Global Product StructuresFigure 10.5 10-25
    • 25. Types of Divisional Structures• Market Structure – Groups divisions according to the particular kinds of customers they serve – Allows managers to be responsive to the needs of their customers and act flexibly in making decisions in response to customers’ changing needs 10-26
    • 26. Matrix Design Structure• Matrix Structure – An organizational structure that simultaneously groups people and resources by function and product. • Results in a complex network of superior- subordinate reporting relationships. • The structure is very flexible and can respond rapidly to the need for change. • Each employee has two bosses (functional manager and product manager) and possibly cannot satisfy both. 10-27
    • 27. Matrix StructureFigure 10.6 10-28
    • 28. Product Team Design Structure• Product Team Structure – Does away with dual reporting relationships and two-boss managers – Functional employees are permanently assigned to a cross-functional team that is empowered to bring a new or redesigned product to work 10-29
    • 29. Product Team Design Structure• Product Team Structure – Cross-functional team is composed of a group of managers from different departments working together to perform organizational tasks. 10-30
    • 30. Product Team StructureFigure 10.6 10-31
    • 31. Hybrid Structures• Hybrid Structure – The structure of a large organization that has many divisions and simultaneously uses many different organizational structures 10-32
    • 32. Federated’s Hybrid Structure Figure 10.7 10-33
    • 33. Coordinating Functions: Allocating Authority• Authority – The power vested in a manager to make decisions and use resources to achieve organizational goals by virtue of his position in an organization 10-34
    • 34. Coordinating Functions: Allocating Authority• Hierarchy of Authority – An organization’s chain of command, specifying the relative authority of each manager. • Span of Control: the number of subordinates who report directly to a manager 10-35
    • 35. Allocating Authority• Line Manager – Someone in the direct line or chain of command who has formal authority over people and resources• Staff Manager – Managers who are functional-area specialists that give advice to line managers. 10-36
    • 36. TheHierarchyof Authorityand Span ofControl atMcDonald’sCorporation Figure 10.8 10-37
    • 37. Tall and Flat Organizations• Tall structures have many levels of authority and narrow spans of control. – As hierarchy levels increase, communication gets difficult creating delays in the time being taken to implement decisions. – Communications can also become distorted as it is repeated through the firm. – Can become expensive 10-38
    • 38. Tall OrganizationsFigure 10.9 10-39
    • 39. Tall and Flat Organizations• Flat structures have fewer levels and wide spans of control. – Structure results in quick communications but can lead to overworked managers. 10-40
    • 40. Flat OrganizationsFigure 10.9 10-41
    • 41. Minimum Chain of Command• Minimum Chain of Command – Top managers should always construct a hierarchy with the fewest levels of authority necessary to efficiently and effectively use organizational resources 10-42
    • 42. Centralization and Decentralization of Authority • Decentralizing authority – giving lower-level managers and non- managerial employees the right to make important decisions about how to use organizational resources 10-43
    • 43. Decentralizing Authority• Disadvantages – Teams may begin to pursue their own goals at the expense of organizational goals – Can result in a lack of communication among divisions 10-44
    • 44. Integrating MechanismsFigure 10.10 10-45
    • 45. Organizational Culture• Organizational culture – shared set of beliefs, expectations, values, and norms that influence how members of an organization relate to one another and cooperate to achieve organizational goals 10-46
    • 46. Sources of an Organization’s Culture Figure 10.11 10-47
    • 47. Organizational Ethics• Organizational Ethics – moral values, beliefs, and rules that establish the appropriate way for an organization and its members to deal with each other and people outside the organization 10-48
    • 48. Organizational Structure• In a centralized organization: – people have little autonomy – norms that focus on being cautious, obeying authority, and respecting traditions emerge – predictability and stability are desired goals 10-49
    • 49. Organizational Structure• In a flat, decentralized structure: – people have more freedom to choose and control their own activities – norms that focus on being creative and courageous and taking risks appear – gives rise to a culture in which innovation and flexibility are desired goals. 10-50
    • 50. Strong, Adaptive Cultures Versus Weak, Inert Cultures• Adaptive cultures – values and norms help an organization to build momentum and to grow and change as needed to achieve its goals and be effective 10-51
    • 51. Strong, Adaptive Cultures Versus Weak, Inert Cultures• Inert cultures – Those that lead to values and norms that fail to motivate or inspire employees – Lead to stagnation and often failure over time 10-52

    ×