Brain In A Box McGill
โขDownload as PPT, PDFโข
1 likeโข731 views
![Presenter ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Brain In A Box McGill
Similar to Brain In A Box McGill (20)
More from California State University Monterey Bay
More from California State University Monterey Bay (17)
Recently uploaded
Brain In A Box McGill
- 1. Linda MacDonald Glenn McGill University Montreal March 18, 2005 Brain in a Box and other Cognitive Curiosities: Legal and Ethical Implications in NeuroEnhancement
- 3. Purpose of Presentation: 1.) Current Developments in Neurotechnologies ๏ช 2.) Ethical considerations 3.) Legal implications
- 6. ย
- 7. ย
- 8. ย
- 9. ย
- 10. ย
- 11. ย
- 12. ย
- 13. ย
- 14. ย
- 15. ย
- 18. Image Courtesy, Society for Neuroscience โ Brain imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) reveals the different regions of the human brain active during various verbal tasks.
- 22. Piracetam : Benefit has not been rigorously proven. European and internet market estimated at billions of dollars.
- 23. ย
- 24. ย
- 25. ย
- 26. ย
- 27. www.hedweb.com www.biopsychiatry.com www.lovedrug.com โthe molecular biology of paradiseโ
- 29. Tell me what you donโt like about yourself โฆ.
- 31. What if there were a mental equivalent for Viagra?
- 33. ย
- 34. ย
Editor's Notes
- My intent is not be an โethics copโ and say all enhancements are good or bad, but to inform, help identify the issues, raise questions and advocate for a thoughtful approach, with careful weighing and balancing of the potential benefits and burdens. Iโm using the term neurotechnologies in the broadest sense, ranging from brain-imaging devices, which can measure changes in blood flow, neurochemistry or neuroanatomy, to medical electronic devices that can improve and restore the function of the human nervous system. For the purposes of this specific presentation, I am limiting my review of current advances to the latest in brain imaging techniques and enhancements.
- In recent years, research groups around the country have implanted electrodes in the brains of animals โand even a few humans โand have used signals detected by those electrodes to move robot arms, levers,and cursors on computer screens, creating brain-machine interfaces. The aim of the work has been to give paralyzed patients the ability to control prosthetic limbs and simple communication tools. But the objective of these experiment is even more far-reaching: to build a computer chip that will restore the cognitive abilities of the brain itself, aiding memory in patients who suffer from such neurological disorders as Alzheimer โs disease and stroke and perhaps eventually enhancing the abilities of healthy minds. To do so, the researchers have to understand neural processes that may be more complicated than those that govern, say, the control of a prosthetic arm.
- While itโs been a fantasy of mine to download French or Spanish tapes, were still a ways away from that, butโฆ
- The media hype suggests that these advances are here in the next few monthsโฆ
- A two-year, $24 million program from the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, launched last fall, is rapidly expanding the boundaries of brain-machine interface research. The six projects funded by DARPA โs program โ including Berger โs at the University of Southern California โ aim to develop technologies that will not only restore but will also augment human capabilities. This coordinated, well- funded โbig scienceโapproach to understanding how minds and machines can interact, he says, could have โtransformational consequences for defense and society.โ The effort will yield a new generation of electrodes, computer chips, and software that might eventually equip soldiers, for example, to control super fast artificial limbs, pilot remote vehicles, and guide mobile robots in hazardous environments, using only the power of their thoughts. Even more remarkable, such devices could enhance decision-making, upgrade memory and cognitive skills, and even allow one person โs brain to communicate wirelessly with another โs.
- Although such applications are as speculative as they are spectacular, scientists no longer view them as pure fantasy. Their new optimism is fueled in part by a host of recent advances in neuroscience, interface hardware, and signal processing. And the influx of money certainly doesnโt hurt. โDARPA is putting much larger resources into the area than has ever been seen before,โ says William Heetderks, director of the Neural Prosthesis Program at the National Institutes of Health. And because researchers in this field of innovative ideas, he adds, the new funding โwill have a tremendous effect.โ
- The key to being able to restore or augment human capabilities, he says, will be gaining access to the brain signals in an unobtrusive way โideally, without wires, electrodes, or surgeries. And though this vision is still years away, our minds may already be on the road to a new way of thinking.
- A primary contribution of PETscans, in the 80s, was to confirm the detectable distinctions between comatose patients, locked-in patients, and patients with a dead cerebral cortex (PVS) and a variety of categories between. Now, 2000+, fMRI scans can produce images of brain activity as fast as every second, whereas PET usually takes 40 seconds or much longer to image brain activity. Thus, with fMRI, scientists can determine with greater precision when brain regions become active and how long they remain active. As a result, they can see whether brain activity occurs simultaneously or sequentially in different brain regions as a patient thinks, feels, or reacts to experimental conditions.
- An fMRI scan can also produce high-quality images that can pinpoint exactly which areas of the brain are being activated. For example, fMRI can produce an image that distinguishes structures less than a millimeter apart, whereas the latest commercial PET scanners can resolve images of structures within 4 millimeters of each other. In contrast to the PETscan, the fMRI provides superior image clarity along with the ability to assess blood flow and brain function in seconds. However, recent FMRIโs studies have shown more cognitive activity in PVS and minimally conscious patients than previously thought.
- To date, however, PET retains the significant advantage of being able to identify which brain receptors are being activated by neurotransmitters, abused drugs, and potential treatment compounds.
- *Nuclear magnetic resonance ( NMR ) is a physical phenomenon involving the interaction of atomic nuclei ย placed in an external magnetic field , measured by monitoring the radiation absorbed and emitted by the atomic nuclei, so we are talking about measuring changes in the brain at the quantum level.
- This is one of my favorite slides โ not intended to denigrate Prozac and the wonderful things it has done for people coping with the serious disease of depression, but it does illustrate that to a large extent, a market driven economy can lead to advertisements/enticements like this one.
- Lest you think I am merely jokingโฆ. Here are some of my favorite illustrative websites.
- Plastic Surgery provides some excellent contrast of healing/restoration vs. enhancement.
- The race is on to develop the thinking personโs Viagra.โ David Stipp, A Pill to Help You Remember , Fortune , Oct 28, 2001. Average scores on memory tests decline steadily after age 25. By late middle age weโre losing, on average, about 1% of our brain volume each year. When it comes to total brainpowerโthe kind thatโs increasingly in demand in the info ageโwell, you may as well put on sneakers and try to literally outsprint the hungry young lions circling your job as to out-cogitate them. Tests that mimic practical memory tasks, such as associating names with new faces and remembering phone numbers after a short delay, suggest that by age 55 most of us are only about 75% as good at learning and recalling new things as we were at 25
- The isolating ambiguity of whether human interactions represent human action or drug action * Also an interesting question, will enhancement choices lead to revisit what it means to be a โpersonโ? Should Beings (i.e. โ Non-humans with Numerous Neural Implants and Augmentations be considered persons if they can make rational choices?) Note: In US law, you do not have to be a human to be a โpersonโ
- If we are just โmeat-botsโ programmed by our genetics and biological chemistry, what does that say about our views of self, identity, and personal responsibility?
- Lawyers would have a field day!
- Should patients have the right to expect the physician to use memory enhancing drugs to keep abreast of the medical literature? Should pastors be expected to take drugs that enhance their skills to listen, to be socially restrained or passionate in the pulpit, to be nonjudgmental? Should the Catholic priest taking confession be given versed so that the next day he will have forgotten the confessed sin? Such an expectation refuses to accept the limits of human being. Would expect professionals to behave in ways that contradict their personal integrity or force them to exhaustion? These are all arguments against enhancements โฆ
- This can be analogized to the current debate regarding steroid use among athletes โ how many of you say that adult athletes should be allowed to freely use steroids? How will the courts deal with the concept of free will and legal intent? What are the legal implications for employment screening, school admissions, insurance policies? What liability is there for an long-term effects or neurotoxicity?