SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 127
Chapter Seven
Revealed Preference
Revealed Preference Analysis
Suppose we observe the demands
(consumption choices) that a
consumer makes for different
budgets. This reveals information
about the consumer’s preferences.
We can use this information to ...
Revealed Preference Analysis
– Test the behavioral hypothesis that
a consumer chooses the most
preferred bundle from those
available.
– Discover the consumer’s
preference relation.
Assumptions on Preferences
Preferences
– do not change while the choice
data are gathered.
– are strictly convex.
– are monotonic.
Together, convexity and
monotonicity imply that the most
preferred affordable bundle is
unique.
Assumptions on Preferences
x2

If preferences are convex and
monotonic (i.e. well-behaved)
then the most preferred
affordable bundle is unique.

x2*

x1*

x1
Direct Preference Revelation
Suppose that the bundle x* is chosen
when the bundle y is affordable.
Then x* is revealed directly as
preferred to y (otherwise y would
have been chosen).
Direct Preference Revelation
x2

The chosen bundle x* is
revealed directly as preferred
to the bundles y and z.
x*
y

z
x1
Direct Preference Revelation
That x is revealed directly as
preferred to y will be written as



x y.
D
Indirect Preference Revelation
Suppose x is revealed directly
preferred to y, and y is revealed
directly preferred to z. Then, by
transitivity, x is revealed indirectly as
preferred to z. Write this as
x z


I




D

y and y

D

z

x



so x

I

z.
Indirect Preference Revelation
x2

z is not affordable when x* is chosen.

x*
z
x1
Indirect Preference Revelation
x2

x* is not affordable when y* is chosen.

x*
y*

z
x1
Indirect Preference Revelation
x2

z is not affordable when x* is chosen.
x* is not affordable when y* is chosen.
x*
y*

z
x1
Indirect Preference Revelation
x2

z is not affordable when x* is chosen.
x* is not affordable when y* is chosen.
So x* and z cannot be compared
x* directly.
y*
z
x1
Indirect Preference Revelation

z is not affordable when x* is chosen.
x* is not affordable when y* is chosen.
So x* and z cannot be compared
x* directly.
But x*x* y*
y*
D
z



x2

x1
Indirect Preference Revelation

z is not affordable when x* is chosen.
x* is not affordable when y* is chosen.
So x* and z cannot be compared
x* directly.
But x*x* y*
y*
D
z
and y*
z




x2

D

x1
Indirect Preference Revelation

z is not affordable when x* is chosen.
x* is not affordable when y* is chosen.
So x* and z cannot be compared
x* directly.
But x*x* y*
y*
D
z
and y*
z



D

x1

so x*



x2

I

z.
Two Axioms of Revealed
Preference
To apply revealed preference
analysis, choices must satisfy two
criteria -- the Weak and the Strong
Axioms of Revealed Preference.
The Weak Axiom of Revealed
Preference (WARP)
If the bundle x is revealed directly as
preferred to the bundle y then it is
never the case that y is revealed
directly as preferred to x; i.e.


D

y

not (y



x

D

x).
The Weak Axiom of Revealed
Preference (WARP)
Choice data which violate the WARP
are inconsistent with economic
rationality.
The WARP is a necessary condition for
applying economic rationality to
explain observed choices.
The Weak Axiom of Revealed
Preference (WARP)
What choice data violate the WARP?
x2

The Weak Axiom of Revealed
Preference (WARP)

y

x
x1
x is chosen when y is available
so x
y.



x2

The Weak Axiom of Revealed
Preference (WARP)
D

y

x
x1
x is chosen when y is available
so x
y.


D

y is chosen when x is available
so y
x.



x2

The Weak Axiom of Revealed
Preference (WARP)

y

D

x
x1
x is chosen when y is available
so x
y.


D

y is chosen when x is available
so y
x.
D
These statements are
inconsistent with
x
each other.
x1



x2

The Weak Axiom of Revealed
Preference (WARP)

y
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
A consumer makes the following
choices:
– At prices (p1,p2)=($2,$2) the choice
was (x1,x2) = (10,1).
– At (p1,p2)=($2,$1) the choice was
(x1,x2) = (5,5).
– At (p1,p2)=($1,$2) the choice was
(x1,x2) = (5,4).
Is the WARP violated by these data?
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Choices
Prices

(10, 1)

(5, 5)

(5, 4)

($2, $2)

$22

$20

$18

($2, $1)

$21

$15

$14

($1, $2)

$12

$15

$13
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Choices
Prices

(10, 1)

(5, 5)

(5, 4)

($2, $2)

$22

$20

$18

($2, $1)

$21

$15

$14

($1, $2)

$12

$15

$13

Red numbers are costs of chosen bundles.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Choices
Prices

(10, 1)

(5, 5)

(5, 4)

($2, $2)

$22

$20

$18

($2, $1)

$21

$15

$14

($1, $2)

$12

$15

$13

Circles surround affordable bundles that
were not chosen.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Choices
Prices

(10, 1)

(5, 5)

(5, 4)

($2, $2)

$22

$20

$18

($2, $1)

$21

$15

$14

($1, $2)

$12

$15

$13

Circles surround affordable bundles that
were not chosen.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Choices
Prices

(10, 1)

(5, 5)

(5, 4)

($2, $2)

$22

$20

$18

($2, $1)

$21

$15

$14

($1, $2)

$12

$15

$13

Circles surround affordable bundles that
were not chosen.
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Ch o i c e s
(10,1) (5,5)
Prices

(5,4)

($2,$2)

$22

$20

$18

(10,1)

($2,$1)

$21

$15

$14

(5, 5)

($1,$2)

$12

$15

$13

(5 ,4)

(10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4)
D

D
D

D
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
Ch o i c e s
(10,1) (5,5)
Prices

(5,4)

($2,$2)

$22

$20

$18

(10,1)

($2,$1)

$21

$15

$14

(5, 5)

($1,$2)

$12

$15

$13

(5 ,4)

(10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4)
D

D
D

D
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
(10,1) is directly
revealed preferred
to (5,4), but (5,4) is
directly revealed
preferred to (10,1),
so the WARP is
violated by the data.

(10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4)
(10,1)

D

(5, 5)
(5 ,4)

D
D

D
Checking if Data Violate the WARP
x2
D

(10,1)

(10,1)





(5,4)

D

(5,4)

x1
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference (SARP)
If the bundle x is revealed (directly or
indirectly) as preferred to the bundle
y and x ≠ y, then it is never the case
that the y is revealed (directly or
indirectly) as preferred to x; i.e.
x
y or x
y







not ( y

I

D

x or y



D

I

x ).
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
What choice data would satisfy the
WARP but violate the SARP?
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
Consider the following data:
A: (p1,p2,p3) = (1,3,10) & (x1,x2,x3) = (3,1,4)
B: (p1,p2,p3) = (4,3,6) & (x1,x2,x3) = (2,5,3)
C: (p1,p2,p3) = (1,1,5) & (x1,x2,x3) = (4,4,3)
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
A: ($1,$3,$10)
(3,1,4).

Choice
Prices

A

B

C

B: ($4,$3,$6)
(2,5,3).

A

$46

$47

$46

B

$39

$41

$46

C: ($1,$1,$5)
(4,4,3).

C

$24

$22

$23
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
Choices
A
Prices

B

C

A

$46 $47 $46

B

$39 $41 $46

C

$24 $22 $23
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
B

C

A

$46 $47 $46

B

$39 $41 $46

In situation A,
bundle A is
directly revealed
preferred to
bundle C;
A C.



Choices
A
Prices

D

C

$24 $22 $23
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
B

C

A

$46 $47 $46

B

$39 $41 $46

In situation B,
bundle B is
directly revealed
preferred to
bundle A;
B A.



Choices
A
Prices

D

C

$24 $22 $23
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
B

C

A

$46 $47 $46

B

$39 $41 $46

In situation C,
bundle C is
directly revealed
preferred to
bundle B;
C B.



Choices
A
Prices

D

C

$24 $22 $23
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
Choices
A
Prices

B

C

A

A

$46 $47 $46

A

B

$39 $41 $46

B

C

$24 $22 $23

C

B

C
D

D
D
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
Choices
A
Prices

B

C

A

A

$46 $47 $46

A

B

$39 $41 $46

B

C

$24 $22 $23

C

B

C
D

D

The data do not violate the WARP.

D
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
We have that




D

C, B

D

A and C



A

A
D

B

so, by transitivity,




I

B, B

I

C and C

A
B



A

I

A.

B

C

C
D

D
D

The data do not violate the WARP but ...
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
We have that




D

C, B

D

A and C



A

A
D

B

so, by transitivity,




I

B, B

I

C and C



A

B
I

A.

I

D

D

C

C

I

A

B

I
D

The data do not violate the WARP but ...
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
D

A is inconsistent

with A





B

I

B.

A

B

I

D

D

C

C

I

A

B

I
D

The data do not violate the WARP but ...
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
D

C is inconsistent

with C





A

I

A.

A

B

I

D

D

C

C

I

A

B

I
D

The data do not violate the WARP but ...
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
D

B is inconsistent

with B





C

I

C.

A

B

I

D

D

C

C

I

A

B

I
D

The data do not violate the WARP but ...
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
A
The data do not violate
the WARP but there are
3 violations of the SARP.

B

I

D

D

C

C

I

A

B

I
D
The Strong Axiom of Revealed
Preference
That the observed choice data
satisfy the SARP is a condition
necessary and sufficient for there to
be a well-behaved preference
relation that “rationalizes” the data.
So our 3 data cannot be rationalized
by a well-behaved preference
relation.
Recovering Indifference Curves
Suppose we have the choice data
satisfy the SARP.
Then we can discover approximately
where are the consumer’s
indifference curves.
How?
Recovering Indifference Curves
Suppose we observe:
A: (p1,p2) = ($1,$1) & (x1,x2) = (15,15)
B: (p1,p2) = ($2,$1) & (x1,x2) = (10,20)
C: (p1,p2) = ($1,$2) & (x1,x2) = (20,10)
D: (p1,p2) = ($2,$5) & (x1,x2) = (30,12)
E: (p1,p2) = ($5,$2) & (x1,x2) = (12,30).
Where lies the indifference curve
containing the bundle A = (15,15)?
Recovering Indifference Curves
The table showing direct preference
revelations is:
Recovering Indifference Curves
A

C

D

A

B

D

E

D

B
C
D

D

D

D

E

D

D

D

Direct revelations only; the WARP
is not violated by the data.
Recovering Indifference Curves
Indirect preference revelations add
no extra information, so the table
showing both direct and indirect
preference revelations is the same
as the table showing only the direct
preference revelations:
Recovering Indifference Curves
A

C

D

A

B

D

E

D

B
C
D

D

D

D

E

D

D

D

Both direct and indirect revelations; neither
WARP nor SARP are violated by the data.
Recovering Indifference Curves
Since the choices satisfy the SARP,
there is a well-behaved preference
relation that “rationalizes” the
choices.
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
E
B
A

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20)
C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10)
D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12)
E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30).
D
C
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
E
B
A

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20)
C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10)
D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12)
E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30).
D
C
x1

Begin with bundles revealed
to be less preferred than bundle A.
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15).

A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15).

A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15).
A is directly revealed preferred
to any bundle in

A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
E

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20).

B
A

C

D

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20).
B
A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A is directly revealed preferred
to B and …
B
A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
B is directly revealed preferred
to all bundles in
B

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

B

so, by transitivity, A is indirectly
revealed preferred to all bundles
in

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
so A is now revealed preferred
to all bundles in the union.
B
A

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
E

C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10).

B
A

C

D

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)

C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10).

A

C
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A is directly revealed
preferred to C and ...

A

C
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

C is directly revealed preferred
to all bundles in

C
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

so, by transitivity, A is
indirectly revealed preferred
to all bundles in

C
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

so A is now revealed preferred
to all bundles in the union.
B
A

C
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

so A is now revealed preferred
to all bundles in the union.
Therefore the indifference
curve containing A must lie
B
everywhere else above
A
this shaded set.
C
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
Now, what about the bundles
revealed as more preferred than A?
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20)
E C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10)
D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12)
B
A E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30).
D
C
A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)

D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12).
A

D

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

D is directly revealed preferred
to A.

A

D

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

D is directly revealed preferred
to A.
Well-behaved preferences are

convex
A

D

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

D is directly revealed preferred
to A.
Well-behaved preferences are
convex so all bundles on the
line between A and D are
A
preferred to A also.
D

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

D is directly revealed preferred
to A.
Well-behaved preferences are
convex so all bundles on the
line between A and D are
A
preferred to A also.
D
As well, ...
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

all bundles containing the
same amount of commodity 2
and more of commodity 1 than
D are preferred to D and
therefore are preferred to A
A
also.
D

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
bundles revealed to be
strictly preferred to A

A
D
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20)
E C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10)
D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12)
B
A E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30).
D
C
A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15)
E
E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30).
A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

E is directly revealed preferred
to A.
E

A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

E is directly revealed preferred
to A.
Well-behaved preferences are

E

convex
A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
E

A

E is directly revealed preferred
to A.
Well-behaved preferences are
convex so all bundles on the
line between A and E are
preferred to A also.

x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
E

A

E is directly revealed preferred
to A.
Well-behaved preferences are
convex so all bundles on the
line between A and E are
preferred to A also.
As well, ...
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

all bundles containing the
same amount of commodity 1
and more of commodity 2 than
E are preferred to E and
therefore are preferred to A
also.

E

A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
More bundles revealed
to be strictly preferred
to A

E

A
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
E
B
A

Bundles revealed
earlier as preferred
to A
C

D
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
E

All bundles revealed
to be preferred to A

B
A
C

D
x1
Recovering Indifference Curves
Now we have upper and lower
bounds on where the indifference
curve containing bundle A may lie.
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
All bundles revealed
to be preferred to A
A

x1
All bundles revealed to be less preferred to A
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2
All bundles revealed
to be preferred to A
A

x1
All bundles revealed to be less preferred to A
Recovering Indifference Curves
x2

The region in which the
indifference curve containing
bundle A must lie.
A

x1
Index Numbers
Over time, many prices change. Are
consumers better or worse off
“overall” as a consequence?
Index numbers give approximate
answers to such questions.
Index Numbers
Two basic types of indices
– price indices, and
– quantity indices
Each index compares expenditures
in a base period and in a current
period by taking the ratio of
expenditures.
Quantity Index Numbers
A quantity index is a price-weighted
average of quantities demanded; i.e.
t
t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Iq =
b
b
p1x1 + p 2x 2

(p1,p2) can be base period prices (p1b,p2b)
or current period prices (p1t,p2t).
Quantity Index Numbers
If (p1,p2) = (p1b,p2b) then we have the
Laspeyres quantity index;
b t
b t
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
Lq =
b b
b b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
Quantity Index Numbers
If (p1,p2) = (p1t,p2t) then we have the
Paasche quantity index;
t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Pq =
t b
t b
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Quantity Index Numbers
How can quantity indices be used to
make statements about changes in
welfare?
Quantity Index Numbers
If

b t
b t
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
Lq =
<1
pbxb + pbxb
1 1
2 2

then

b t
b t
b b
b b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 < p1 x1 + p 2 x 2

so consumers overall were better off
in the base period than they are now
in the current period.
Quantity Index Numbers
If

t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Pq =
>1
t b
t b
p1x1 + p 2x 2

then

t t
t t
t b
t b
p1x1 + p 2x 2 > p1x1 + p 2x 2

so consumers overall are better off
in the current period than in the base
period.
Price Index Numbers
A price index is a quantity-weighted
average of prices; i.e.
t
t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Ip =
b
b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
(x1,x2) can be the base period bundle
(x1b,x2b) or else the current period
bundle (x1t,x2t).
Price Index Numbers
If (x1,x2) = (x1b,x2b) then we have the
Laspeyres price index;
t b
t b
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Lp =
b b
b b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
Price Index Numbers
If (x1,x2) = (x1t,x2t) then we have the
Paasche price index;
t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Pp =
b t
b t
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
Price Index Numbers
How can price indices be used to
make statements about changes in
welfare?
Define the expenditure ratio
t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
M=
b b
b b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
Price Index Numbers
If

Lp =

t
p1xb + pt xb
1
2 2

<
b b
b b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2

then
t b
t b
p1x1 + p 2x 2

<

t t
p1x1 + pt xt
2 2

b b
b b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2

=M

t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2

so consumers overall are better off
in the current period.
Price Index Numbers
But, if
t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Pp =
b t
b t
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2

>

t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
=M
pbxb + pbxb
1 1
2 2

<

b b
b b
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2

then
b t
b t
p1 x1 + p 2 x 2

so consumers overall were better off
in the base period.
Full Indexation?
Changes in price indices are
sometimes used to adjust wage rates
or transfer payments. This is called
“indexation”.
“Full indexation” occurs when the
wages or payments are increased at
the same rate as the price index
being used to measure the aggregate
inflation rate.
Full Indexation?
Since prices do not all increase at
the same rate, relative prices change
along with the “general price level”.
A common proposal is to index fully
Social Security payments, with the
intention of preserving for the elderly
the “purchasing power” of these
payments.
Full Indexation?
The usual price index proposed for
indexation is the Paasche quantity
index (the Consumers’ Price Index).
What will be the consequence?
Full Indexation?
t t
t t
p1x1 + p 2x 2
Pq =
t b
t b
p1x1 + p 2x 2

Notice that this index uses current
period prices to weight both base and
current period consumptions.
Full Indexation?
x2

Base period budget constraint
Base period choice

x2b

x1b

x1
Full Indexation?
x2

Base period budget constraint
Base period choice

x2b

Current period budget
constraint before indexation
x1b

x1
Full Indexation?
x2

Base period budget constraint
Base period choice
Current period budget
constraint after full indexation

x2b

x1b

x1
Full Indexation?
x2

Base period budget constraint
Base period choice
Current period budget
constraint after indexation

x2b

x1b

Current period
choice
after indexation
x1
Full Indexation?
x2

Base period budget constraint
Base period choice
Current period budget
constraint after indexation

x2b
x2

t

x1b

x1 t

Current period
choice
after indexation
x1
Full Indexation?
x2

(x1t,x2t) is revealed preferred to
(x1b,x2b) so full indexation makes
the recipient strictly better off if
relative prices change between
the base and current periods.

x2b
x2 t
x1b

x1 t

x1
Full Indexation?
So how large is this “bias” in the US
CPI?
A table of recent estimates of the
bias is given in the Journal of
Economic Perspectives, Volume 10,
No. 4, p. 160 (1996). Some of this list
of point and interval estimates are as
follows:
Full Indexation?
Author

Point Est.

Int. Est.

Adv. Commission to
Study the CPI (1995)
Congressional
Budget Office (1995)
Alan Greenspan
(1995)
Shapiro & Wilcox
(1996)

1.0%

0.7 - 2.0%
0.2 - 0.8%
0.5 - 1.5%

1.0%

0.6 - 1.5%
Full Indexation?
So suppose a social security recipient
gained by 1% per year for 20 years.
Q: How large would the bias have
become at the end of the period?
Full Indexation?
So suppose a social security recipient
gained by 1% per year for 20 years.
Q: How large would the bias have
become at the end of the period?
(1 + 0 ⋅ 01) 20 = 1 ⋅ 0120 = 1 ⋅ 22 so after
A:
20 years social security payments
would be about 22% “too large”.

More Related Content

What's hot

Welfareeconomics Efficiencyequity
Welfareeconomics  EfficiencyequityWelfareeconomics  Efficiencyequity
Welfareeconomics Efficiencyequity
SureshRamu
 
A Presentation on IS-LM Model
A Presentation on IS-LM ModelA Presentation on IS-LM Model
A Presentation on IS-LM Model
Dhananjay Ghei
 
Varian, microeconomic analysis, solution book
Varian, microeconomic analysis, solution bookVarian, microeconomic analysis, solution book
Varian, microeconomic analysis, solution book
José Antonio PAYANO YALE
 

What's hot (20)

Welfareeconomics Efficiencyequity
Welfareeconomics  EfficiencyequityWelfareeconomics  Efficiencyequity
Welfareeconomics Efficiencyequity
 
Ch4
Ch4Ch4
Ch4
 
Indifference Curves and Consumer Equilibrium
Indifference Curves and Consumer EquilibriumIndifference Curves and Consumer Equilibrium
Indifference Curves and Consumer Equilibrium
 
Hicks slutsky income and substitution effect
Hicks slutsky income and substitution effectHicks slutsky income and substitution effect
Hicks slutsky income and substitution effect
 
General equilibrium theory
General equilibrium theoryGeneral equilibrium theory
General equilibrium theory
 
MACROECONOMICS-CH16
MACROECONOMICS-CH16MACROECONOMICS-CH16
MACROECONOMICS-CH16
 
A Presentation on IS-LM Model
A Presentation on IS-LM ModelA Presentation on IS-LM Model
A Presentation on IS-LM Model
 
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter (15)
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter  (15)Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter  (15)
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter (15)
 
Varian, microeconomic analysis, solution book
Varian, microeconomic analysis, solution bookVarian, microeconomic analysis, solution book
Varian, microeconomic analysis, solution book
 
Duopoly
DuopolyDuopoly
Duopoly
 
Determinants of Consumption Function
Determinants of Consumption Function Determinants of Consumption Function
Determinants of Consumption Function
 
Cointegration and error correction model
Cointegration and error correction modelCointegration and error correction model
Cointegration and error correction model
 
Lecture7
Lecture7Lecture7
Lecture7
 
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter (5)
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter  (5)Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter  (5)
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter (5)
 
Bergson social welfare function(1).pptx
Bergson social welfare function(1).pptxBergson social welfare function(1).pptx
Bergson social welfare function(1).pptx
 
INDIRECT UTILITY FUNCTION AND ROY’S IDENTITIY by Maryam Lone
INDIRECT UTILITY FUNCTION AND ROY’S IDENTITIY by Maryam LoneINDIRECT UTILITY FUNCTION AND ROY’S IDENTITIY by Maryam Lone
INDIRECT UTILITY FUNCTION AND ROY’S IDENTITIY by Maryam Lone
 
Econometrics ch3
Econometrics ch3Econometrics ch3
Econometrics ch3
 
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter (16)
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter  (16)Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter  (16)
Gregory mankiw macroeconomic 7th edition chapter (16)
 
Offer curve
Offer curveOffer curve
Offer curve
 
Baumol's model of demand for money
Baumol's model of demand for moneyBaumol's model of demand for money
Baumol's model of demand for money
 

More from Jan Novak (20)

Ch25
Ch25Ch25
Ch25
 
Ch24
Ch24Ch24
Ch24
 
Ch23
Ch23Ch23
Ch23
 
Ch21
Ch21Ch21
Ch21
 
Ch20
Ch20Ch20
Ch20
 
Ch19
Ch19Ch19
Ch19
 
Ch18
Ch18Ch18
Ch18
 
Ch17
Ch17Ch17
Ch17
 
Ch16
Ch16Ch16
Ch16
 
Ch15
Ch15Ch15
Ch15
 
Ch14
Ch14Ch14
Ch14
 
Ch13
Ch13Ch13
Ch13
 
Ch12
Ch12Ch12
Ch12
 
Ch11
Ch11Ch11
Ch11
 
Ch10
Ch10Ch10
Ch10
 
Ch9
Ch9Ch9
Ch9
 
Ch8
Ch8Ch8
Ch8
 
Ch6
Ch6Ch6
Ch6
 
Ch5
Ch5Ch5
Ch5
 
Ch2
Ch2Ch2
Ch2
 

Recently uploaded

Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 

Ch7

  • 2. Revealed Preference Analysis Suppose we observe the demands (consumption choices) that a consumer makes for different budgets. This reveals information about the consumer’s preferences. We can use this information to ...
  • 3. Revealed Preference Analysis – Test the behavioral hypothesis that a consumer chooses the most preferred bundle from those available. – Discover the consumer’s preference relation.
  • 4. Assumptions on Preferences Preferences – do not change while the choice data are gathered. – are strictly convex. – are monotonic. Together, convexity and monotonicity imply that the most preferred affordable bundle is unique.
  • 5. Assumptions on Preferences x2 If preferences are convex and monotonic (i.e. well-behaved) then the most preferred affordable bundle is unique. x2* x1* x1
  • 6. Direct Preference Revelation Suppose that the bundle x* is chosen when the bundle y is affordable. Then x* is revealed directly as preferred to y (otherwise y would have been chosen).
  • 7. Direct Preference Revelation x2 The chosen bundle x* is revealed directly as preferred to the bundles y and z. x* y z x1
  • 8. Direct Preference Revelation That x is revealed directly as preferred to y will be written as  x y. D
  • 9. Indirect Preference Revelation Suppose x is revealed directly preferred to y, and y is revealed directly preferred to z. Then, by transitivity, x is revealed indirectly as preferred to z. Write this as x z  I   D y and y D z x  so x I z.
  • 10. Indirect Preference Revelation x2 z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* z x1
  • 11. Indirect Preference Revelation x2 x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. x* y* z x1
  • 12. Indirect Preference Revelation x2 z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. x* y* z x1
  • 13. Indirect Preference Revelation x2 z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. y* z x1
  • 14. Indirect Preference Revelation z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. But x*x* y* y* D z  x2 x1
  • 15. Indirect Preference Revelation z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. But x*x* y* y* D z and y* z   x2 D x1
  • 16. Indirect Preference Revelation z is not affordable when x* is chosen. x* is not affordable when y* is chosen. So x* and z cannot be compared x* directly. But x*x* y* y* D z and y* z   D x1 so x*  x2 I z.
  • 17. Two Axioms of Revealed Preference To apply revealed preference analysis, choices must satisfy two criteria -- the Weak and the Strong Axioms of Revealed Preference.
  • 18. The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) If the bundle x is revealed directly as preferred to the bundle y then it is never the case that y is revealed directly as preferred to x; i.e.  D y not (y  x D x).
  • 19. The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) Choice data which violate the WARP are inconsistent with economic rationality. The WARP is a necessary condition for applying economic rationality to explain observed choices.
  • 20. The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) What choice data violate the WARP?
  • 21. x2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) y x x1
  • 22. x is chosen when y is available so x y.  x2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) D y x x1
  • 23. x is chosen when y is available so x y.  D y is chosen when x is available so y x.  x2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) y D x x1
  • 24. x is chosen when y is available so x y.  D y is chosen when x is available so y x. D These statements are inconsistent with x each other. x1  x2 The Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference (WARP) y
  • 25. Checking if Data Violate the WARP A consumer makes the following choices: – At prices (p1,p2)=($2,$2) the choice was (x1,x2) = (10,1). – At (p1,p2)=($2,$1) the choice was (x1,x2) = (5,5). – At (p1,p2)=($1,$2) the choice was (x1,x2) = (5,4). Is the WARP violated by these data?
  • 26. Checking if Data Violate the WARP Choices Prices (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) ($2, $2) $22 $20 $18 ($2, $1) $21 $15 $14 ($1, $2) $12 $15 $13
  • 27. Checking if Data Violate the WARP Choices Prices (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) ($2, $2) $22 $20 $18 ($2, $1) $21 $15 $14 ($1, $2) $12 $15 $13 Red numbers are costs of chosen bundles.
  • 28. Checking if Data Violate the WARP Choices Prices (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) ($2, $2) $22 $20 $18 ($2, $1) $21 $15 $14 ($1, $2) $12 $15 $13 Circles surround affordable bundles that were not chosen.
  • 29. Checking if Data Violate the WARP Choices Prices (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) ($2, $2) $22 $20 $18 ($2, $1) $21 $15 $14 ($1, $2) $12 $15 $13 Circles surround affordable bundles that were not chosen.
  • 30. Checking if Data Violate the WARP Choices Prices (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) ($2, $2) $22 $20 $18 ($2, $1) $21 $15 $14 ($1, $2) $12 $15 $13 Circles surround affordable bundles that were not chosen.
  • 31. Checking if Data Violate the WARP Ch o i c e s (10,1) (5,5) Prices (5,4) ($2,$2) $22 $20 $18 (10,1) ($2,$1) $21 $15 $14 (5, 5) ($1,$2) $12 $15 $13 (5 ,4) (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) D D D D
  • 32. Checking if Data Violate the WARP Ch o i c e s (10,1) (5,5) Prices (5,4) ($2,$2) $22 $20 $18 (10,1) ($2,$1) $21 $15 $14 (5, 5) ($1,$2) $12 $15 $13 (5 ,4) (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) D D D D
  • 33. Checking if Data Violate the WARP (10,1) is directly revealed preferred to (5,4), but (5,4) is directly revealed preferred to (10,1), so the WARP is violated by the data. (10, 1) (5, 5) (5, 4) (10,1) D (5, 5) (5 ,4) D D D
  • 34. Checking if Data Violate the WARP x2 D (10,1) (10,1)   (5,4) D (5,4) x1
  • 35. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference (SARP) If the bundle x is revealed (directly or indirectly) as preferred to the bundle y and x ≠ y, then it is never the case that the y is revealed (directly or indirectly) as preferred to x; i.e. x y or x y    not ( y I D x or y  D I x ).
  • 36. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference What choice data would satisfy the WARP but violate the SARP?
  • 37. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference Consider the following data: A: (p1,p2,p3) = (1,3,10) & (x1,x2,x3) = (3,1,4) B: (p1,p2,p3) = (4,3,6) & (x1,x2,x3) = (2,5,3) C: (p1,p2,p3) = (1,1,5) & (x1,x2,x3) = (4,4,3)
  • 38. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference A: ($1,$3,$10) (3,1,4). Choice Prices A B C B: ($4,$3,$6) (2,5,3). A $46 $47 $46 B $39 $41 $46 C: ($1,$1,$5) (4,4,3). C $24 $22 $23
  • 39. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference Choices A Prices B C A $46 $47 $46 B $39 $41 $46 C $24 $22 $23
  • 40. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference B C A $46 $47 $46 B $39 $41 $46 In situation A, bundle A is directly revealed preferred to bundle C; A C.  Choices A Prices D C $24 $22 $23
  • 41. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference B C A $46 $47 $46 B $39 $41 $46 In situation B, bundle B is directly revealed preferred to bundle A; B A.  Choices A Prices D C $24 $22 $23
  • 42. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference B C A $46 $47 $46 B $39 $41 $46 In situation C, bundle C is directly revealed preferred to bundle B; C B.  Choices A Prices D C $24 $22 $23
  • 43. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference Choices A Prices B C A A $46 $47 $46 A B $39 $41 $46 B C $24 $22 $23 C B C D D D
  • 44. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference Choices A Prices B C A A $46 $47 $46 A B $39 $41 $46 B C $24 $22 $23 C B C D D The data do not violate the WARP. D
  • 45. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference We have that   D C, B D A and C  A A D B so, by transitivity,   I B, B I C and C A B  A I A. B C C D D D The data do not violate the WARP but ...
  • 46. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference We have that   D C, B D A and C  A A D B so, by transitivity,   I B, B I C and C  A B I A. I D D C C I A B I D The data do not violate the WARP but ...
  • 47. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference D A is inconsistent with A   B I B. A B I D D C C I A B I D The data do not violate the WARP but ...
  • 48. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference D C is inconsistent with C   A I A. A B I D D C C I A B I D The data do not violate the WARP but ...
  • 49. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference D B is inconsistent with B   C I C. A B I D D C C I A B I D The data do not violate the WARP but ...
  • 50. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference A The data do not violate the WARP but there are 3 violations of the SARP. B I D D C C I A B I D
  • 51. The Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference That the observed choice data satisfy the SARP is a condition necessary and sufficient for there to be a well-behaved preference relation that “rationalizes” the data. So our 3 data cannot be rationalized by a well-behaved preference relation.
  • 52. Recovering Indifference Curves Suppose we have the choice data satisfy the SARP. Then we can discover approximately where are the consumer’s indifference curves. How?
  • 53. Recovering Indifference Curves Suppose we observe: A: (p1,p2) = ($1,$1) & (x1,x2) = (15,15) B: (p1,p2) = ($2,$1) & (x1,x2) = (10,20) C: (p1,p2) = ($1,$2) & (x1,x2) = (20,10) D: (p1,p2) = ($2,$5) & (x1,x2) = (30,12) E: (p1,p2) = ($5,$2) & (x1,x2) = (12,30). Where lies the indifference curve containing the bundle A = (15,15)?
  • 54. Recovering Indifference Curves The table showing direct preference revelations is:
  • 55. Recovering Indifference Curves A C D A B D E D B C D D D D E D D D Direct revelations only; the WARP is not violated by the data.
  • 56. Recovering Indifference Curves Indirect preference revelations add no extra information, so the table showing both direct and indirect preference revelations is the same as the table showing only the direct preference revelations:
  • 57. Recovering Indifference Curves A C D A B D E D B C D D D D E D D D Both direct and indirect revelations; neither WARP nor SARP are violated by the data.
  • 58. Recovering Indifference Curves Since the choices satisfy the SARP, there is a well-behaved preference relation that “rationalizes” the choices.
  • 59. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E B A A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20) C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10) D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12) E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30). D C x1
  • 60. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E B A A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20) C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10) D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12) E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30). D C x1 Begin with bundles revealed to be less preferred than bundle A.
  • 61. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15). A x1
  • 62. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15). A x1
  • 63. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15). A is directly revealed preferred to any bundle in A x1
  • 64. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20). B A C D x1
  • 65. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20). B A x1
  • 66. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A is directly revealed preferred to B and … B A x1
  • 67. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 B is directly revealed preferred to all bundles in B x1
  • 68. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 B so, by transitivity, A is indirectly revealed preferred to all bundles in x1
  • 69. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 so A is now revealed preferred to all bundles in the union. B A x1
  • 70. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) E C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10). B A C D x1
  • 71. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10). A C x1
  • 72. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A is directly revealed preferred to C and ... A C x1
  • 73. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 C is directly revealed preferred to all bundles in C x1
  • 74. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 so, by transitivity, A is indirectly revealed preferred to all bundles in C x1
  • 75. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 so A is now revealed preferred to all bundles in the union. B A C x1
  • 76. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 so A is now revealed preferred to all bundles in the union. Therefore the indifference curve containing A must lie B everywhere else above A this shaded set. C x1
  • 77. Recovering Indifference Curves Now, what about the bundles revealed as more preferred than A?
  • 78. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20) E C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10) D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12) B A E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30). D C A x1
  • 79. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12). A D x1
  • 80. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. A D x1
  • 81. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex A D x1
  • 82. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and D are A preferred to A also. D x1
  • 83. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 D is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and D are A preferred to A also. D As well, ... x1
  • 84. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 all bundles containing the same amount of commodity 2 and more of commodity 1 than D are preferred to D and therefore are preferred to A A also. D x1
  • 85. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 bundles revealed to be strictly preferred to A A D x1
  • 86. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) B: (p1,p2)=(2,1); (x1,x2)=(10,20) E C: (p1,p2)=(1,2); (x1,x2)=(20,10) D: (p1,p2)=(2,5); (x1,x2)=(30,12) B A E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30). D C A x1
  • 87. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 A: (p1,p2)=(1,1); (x1,x2)=(15,15) E E: (p1,p2)=(5,2); (x1,x2)=(12,30). A x1
  • 88. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E is directly revealed preferred to A. E A x1
  • 89. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are E convex A x1
  • 90. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E A E is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and E are preferred to A also. x1
  • 91. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E A E is directly revealed preferred to A. Well-behaved preferences are convex so all bundles on the line between A and E are preferred to A also. As well, ... x1
  • 92. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 all bundles containing the same amount of commodity 1 and more of commodity 2 than E are preferred to E and therefore are preferred to A also. E A x1
  • 93. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 More bundles revealed to be strictly preferred to A E A x1
  • 94. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E B A Bundles revealed earlier as preferred to A C D x1
  • 95. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 E All bundles revealed to be preferred to A B A C D x1
  • 96. Recovering Indifference Curves Now we have upper and lower bounds on where the indifference curve containing bundle A may lie.
  • 97. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 All bundles revealed to be preferred to A A x1 All bundles revealed to be less preferred to A
  • 98. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 All bundles revealed to be preferred to A A x1 All bundles revealed to be less preferred to A
  • 99. Recovering Indifference Curves x2 The region in which the indifference curve containing bundle A must lie. A x1
  • 100. Index Numbers Over time, many prices change. Are consumers better or worse off “overall” as a consequence? Index numbers give approximate answers to such questions.
  • 101. Index Numbers Two basic types of indices – price indices, and – quantity indices Each index compares expenditures in a base period and in a current period by taking the ratio of expenditures.
  • 102. Quantity Index Numbers A quantity index is a price-weighted average of quantities demanded; i.e. t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 Iq = b b p1x1 + p 2x 2 (p1,p2) can be base period prices (p1b,p2b) or current period prices (p1t,p2t).
  • 103. Quantity Index Numbers If (p1,p2) = (p1b,p2b) then we have the Laspeyres quantity index; b t b t p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 Lq = b b b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
  • 104. Quantity Index Numbers If (p1,p2) = (p1t,p2t) then we have the Paasche quantity index; t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 Pq = t b t b p1x1 + p 2x 2
  • 105. Quantity Index Numbers How can quantity indices be used to make statements about changes in welfare?
  • 106. Quantity Index Numbers If b t b t p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 Lq = <1 pbxb + pbxb 1 1 2 2 then b t b t b b b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 < p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 so consumers overall were better off in the base period than they are now in the current period.
  • 107. Quantity Index Numbers If t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 Pq = >1 t b t b p1x1 + p 2x 2 then t t t t t b t b p1x1 + p 2x 2 > p1x1 + p 2x 2 so consumers overall are better off in the current period than in the base period.
  • 108. Price Index Numbers A price index is a quantity-weighted average of prices; i.e. t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 Ip = b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 (x1,x2) can be the base period bundle (x1b,x2b) or else the current period bundle (x1t,x2t).
  • 109. Price Index Numbers If (x1,x2) = (x1b,x2b) then we have the Laspeyres price index; t b t b p1x1 + p 2x 2 Lp = b b b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
  • 110. Price Index Numbers If (x1,x2) = (x1t,x2t) then we have the Paasche price index; t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 Pp = b t b t p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
  • 111. Price Index Numbers How can price indices be used to make statements about changes in welfare? Define the expenditure ratio t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 M= b b b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2
  • 112. Price Index Numbers If Lp = t p1xb + pt xb 1 2 2 < b b b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 then t b t b p1x1 + p 2x 2 < t t p1x1 + pt xt 2 2 b b b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 =M t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 so consumers overall are better off in the current period.
  • 113. Price Index Numbers But, if t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 Pp = b t b t p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 > t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 =M pbxb + pbxb 1 1 2 2 < b b b b p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 then b t b t p1 x1 + p 2 x 2 so consumers overall were better off in the base period.
  • 114. Full Indexation? Changes in price indices are sometimes used to adjust wage rates or transfer payments. This is called “indexation”. “Full indexation” occurs when the wages or payments are increased at the same rate as the price index being used to measure the aggregate inflation rate.
  • 115. Full Indexation? Since prices do not all increase at the same rate, relative prices change along with the “general price level”. A common proposal is to index fully Social Security payments, with the intention of preserving for the elderly the “purchasing power” of these payments.
  • 116. Full Indexation? The usual price index proposed for indexation is the Paasche quantity index (the Consumers’ Price Index). What will be the consequence?
  • 117. Full Indexation? t t t t p1x1 + p 2x 2 Pq = t b t b p1x1 + p 2x 2 Notice that this index uses current period prices to weight both base and current period consumptions.
  • 118. Full Indexation? x2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice x2b x1b x1
  • 119. Full Indexation? x2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice x2b Current period budget constraint before indexation x1b x1
  • 120. Full Indexation? x2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice Current period budget constraint after full indexation x2b x1b x1
  • 121. Full Indexation? x2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice Current period budget constraint after indexation x2b x1b Current period choice after indexation x1
  • 122. Full Indexation? x2 Base period budget constraint Base period choice Current period budget constraint after indexation x2b x2 t x1b x1 t Current period choice after indexation x1
  • 123. Full Indexation? x2 (x1t,x2t) is revealed preferred to (x1b,x2b) so full indexation makes the recipient strictly better off if relative prices change between the base and current periods. x2b x2 t x1b x1 t x1
  • 124. Full Indexation? So how large is this “bias” in the US CPI? A table of recent estimates of the bias is given in the Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 10, No. 4, p. 160 (1996). Some of this list of point and interval estimates are as follows:
  • 125. Full Indexation? Author Point Est. Int. Est. Adv. Commission to Study the CPI (1995) Congressional Budget Office (1995) Alan Greenspan (1995) Shapiro & Wilcox (1996) 1.0% 0.7 - 2.0% 0.2 - 0.8% 0.5 - 1.5% 1.0% 0.6 - 1.5%
  • 126. Full Indexation? So suppose a social security recipient gained by 1% per year for 20 years. Q: How large would the bias have become at the end of the period?
  • 127. Full Indexation? So suppose a social security recipient gained by 1% per year for 20 years. Q: How large would the bias have become at the end of the period? (1 + 0 ⋅ 01) 20 = 1 ⋅ 0120 = 1 ⋅ 22 so after A: 20 years social security payments would be about 22% “too large”.