• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
There’s an app for that? The impact of Community Knowledge Workers in Uganda
 

There’s an app for that? The impact of Community Knowledge Workers in Uganda

on

  • 276 views

Presentation by Bjorn Van Campenhout, Senior Research Staff, Development Strategy and Governance, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) - Kampala ...

Presentation by Bjorn Van Campenhout, Senior Research Staff, Development Strategy and Governance, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) - Kampala
Session: Impacts of ICTs for Agricultural Development Interventions
on 6 Nov 2013
ICT4Ag, Kigali, Rwanda

Statistics

Views

Total Views
276
Views on SlideShare
276
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    There’s an app for that? The impact of Community Knowledge Workers in Uganda There’s an app for that? The impact of Community Knowledge Workers in Uganda Presentation Transcript

    • There’s an app for that? The impact of Community Knowledge Workers in Uganda Bjorn Van Campenhout IFPRI - Kampala ICT4Ag International Conference - 4-8 November 2013 - Kigali, Rwanda
    • Context • IFPRI Kampala was asked to do an impact assessment of the CKW project in Uganda using best method given time and budget • CKW = Community Knowledge Worker – Locally recruited – Smartphones (GPRS/EDGE) – Comprehensive information
    • Difference-in-Differences study: Methodology • One could calculate the difference between farmer’s outcomes who are served by CKWs, and farmer’s outcomes that are not, but the estimate will include a selection effect – CKWs may be deployed in agriculturally favorable areas • One could calculate the difference between a farmer’s outcomes before the CKW intervention and the SAME farmer’s outcomes after the intervention, but the estimate will include all things that affect the outcome – Bumper harvest, drought, sick family member, etc. • One could compare the difference between the outcomes of farmers that were served by CKWs and the outcomes of farmers that were not served by CKWs, with the difference between the outcomes of these two groups before CKWs were introduced. – In other words, one controls for the fact that farmers that receive CKW services might be different to begin with.
    • Difference-in-Differences study: Methodology
    • Difference-in-Differences study: Data • Surveyed farmers in three CKW districts after CKW – Kapchorwa, Gulu and Oyam and two control districts Sironko and Lira for 2011/12. • Used 2 surveys before CKW: • UNHS 2005/06 • WFP2009/10 ! Subset of treated households form a panel 2009/10 – 2011/12 !
    • Results: Crop portfolio
    • Results: Maize Productivity
    • Results: share of maize sold
    • Results: price of maize sold
    • Treatment intensity
    • Conclusions • CKW makes a difference: – Change in crop mix – Higher price for maize – Lower share of maize sold • But: no effect on productivity… why? • Information is public good