This presentation makes use of survey data collected in Italy, Spain, UK and Austria by the ITHACA project, to study he links between migrants’ integration and their transnational engagement.
ITHACA (Integration, Transnational Mobility and Human, Social and Economic Capital Transfers) is an EU funded project led by the European University Institute.
Log your LOA pain with Pension Lab's brilliant campaign
Links between Integration and Transnational Mobility
1. 1
Links between integration and
transnational mobility:
some quantitative insights from ITHACA
Laura Bartolini
ITHACA Final Conference
21-22 October 2015 – Villa La Fonte, EUI
2. • I & T: concepts and measures
• ITHACA focuses on TM rather than T
– Data scarcity and the purposes of the ITHACA Survey
– Fieldwork and sampling (strengths and weaknesses)
• Some quantitative insights from the Survey
– TM Index: a synthetic measure of TM
– Correlations between I and TM Index
2
Outline
of the presentation
Overall purpose is
to complement
qualitative analyses
3. • It encompasses economic, social,
cultural, political and institutional
dimensions: multi-faceted and multi-
dimensional
• Multi-layered (from individuals to macro
perspectives)
• Capacity & desire to be ‘integrated’ / to
integrate
Challenges
• Assessing (micro/macro)
• Comparing across time & space
• Measuring integration (aggregate level)
– Administrative and Survey data
– Zaragoza list and Eurostat extended list
of indicators (EUI/MPC expertise on I)
3
On I & T
concepts and measures
• TN migrant links different contexts
• Multi-faceted and multi-dimensional
• Fascinating conceptual innovations (TN
social spaces/ networks/ communities),
new ways of understanding identity,
belonging, participation, integration…
• Capacity & desire to be TN
Challenges
• Overemployed transnational practices
• Concerns only a minority of migrants
• How do you capture it? What data do we
have/ need to measure this phenomenon?
• How can we compare across time &
space?
4. 4
The
ITHACA Project
Aim of the study
To study the LINK between TM and the
integration condition of migrants and returnees
Transnational
(economic)
practices
Physical Mobility
Mobility through
transfers
Civic / virtual
mobility
Transnationalmobility
Means Investments
6. • Entry criteria
– To be (economically) active in both localities (CoD / CoO)
– To be quite regular in terms of (physical) TM
• Challenges
– Long and dispersed fieldwork over 9 countries
– Difficult to find migrants with the desired characteristics
– In some cases, difficult to find success stories / willingness to
share
• Final sample
6
Fieldwork
and challenges
7. 7
Integration at
destination
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
BIH
IND
MOR
PHI
UKR
Ret
CoO only
CoD only
Both
Elsewhere too
54% females
16% under 30 yrs
59% between 31-50 yrs
74% urban place of birth
29% post-graduate education
39% graduate education
61% married / cohabiting
57% has children
324
interviews
0
20
40
60
80
100
Before First at
destination
Current
Entrepreneur
High
Medium
Unskilled
Not Emp. *
Occupation
Place of
education
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
BIH
IND
UKR
Ret
IND
MOR
PHI
UKR
Ret
IND
MO
PHI
UKR
Ret
BIH
IND
PHI
UKR
Ret
AT ES IT UK
Length of
stay
8. 8
Means of T/ 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 1 2-3 4+
BIH
IND
MOR
PHI
UKR
Ret
0 20 40 60 80 100
BIH
IND
MOR
PHI
UKR
Ret
Family
Property & Bus.
Finding Job
Settling
Bureaucracy
Activism/Health
How many times have you
travelled between CoD and CoO
over the past 2 years? (%)
Why?
Family & Future
Physical
mobility
9. 9
Means of T / 2
24
21
21
44
37
47
0 20 40 60 80 100
BIH
IND
MOR
PHI
UKR
Ret
33
46
36
14
0 20 40 60 80 100
AT
ES
IT
UK
Never
Sometimes
Regularly
Mobility
through
transfers
Do you send
remittances? (%)
50
21
24
4
1
24
9
0 10 20 30 40 50
Subsistence
Education
Investment
Debt repayment
Mortgage
Family events
Donations
Why?
(%)
10. 10
Means of T / 3
Civic
mobility
Membership and
participation in NGOs &
associations
(transnational
connotation)
11. They convey different types of information
Single multidimensional measure (index)
• Aggregation method
• Varies between 1 (low TM) and 4 (high TM)
11
A multidimensional
measure of TM
Means of transnationalism
Transnational
mobility index
Physical
mobility
Mobility
through transfers
Civic
Mobility
Demography, education, family +/- +/- +/- +/-
Socio-cultural integration +/- +/- +/- +/-
Structural Integration +/- +/- +/- +/-
Transnational economic activities +/- +/- +/- +/-
Low correlation
between the 3
dimensions
TMI-1 TMI-2
Physical mobility +
Mob. through transfers
TMI-1 +
Civic mobility
12. TMI-1 TMI-2
Corr. Corr.
Demography,
education & family
Age (classes) ↘↗ ↗
Child ↗ ↗
Tertiary educated ↘↗
Educated also abroad ↘
Child in CoD ↗
Child in CoO ↗
Dependent in CoO ↗ ↗
Social and structural
integration in CoD
Dual citizenship ↘↗
Prevalent status - permanent ↗
Self-employed ↗
Prof. / Trade U. member in CoD ↗
Income prevalently in CoD ↗ ↗
Investment in CoD (business) ↗
Intention to settle in COO ↗ ↘↗
TN economic activities
Investment in CoO ↗ ↗
Employ others in CoO ↘↗ ↘↗
Travels for taking care of
property/bus. ↗ ↗
12
Sketchy results / 1
Link between TMI and
selected I & T variables
• TM migrants are working-
age adults with some family
dependents in another
country
• Self employment
• Legal status
• Investment at origin
• No stable association with
sex, cultural integration,
structural integration in the
L mkt (purposive sample,
self selection)
13. 13
Sketchy results / 2
By origin By destination
Low TM
High TM
Link between TMI-1 and the country of origin and of destination
, the nature of our data does not allow for something more solid/independent
The processes of integration involve both migrants and the receiving society, and in many cases also the sending country.
Integration involves the real economy and the cultural space, it involves the political realm, the social sphere and everyday public life
Challenging: because of the diverse normative understandings of what integration actually entails, what it presupposes, and how it is ‘achieved’
Measuring Integration Eurostat follows the Zaragoza declaration (2010) to set a list of integration indicators and related sources:
Administrative data (permits, citizenship etc.)
Survey data (employment, education, social inclusion)
Change/comparability of definitions and laws across country
Validity/comparability of survey data: indicators are calculated from micro-data produced by each EU member through surveys primarily designed to represent the overall population under/mis-representation of TCNs, especially for smaller groups/communities
TN measures
No data collection and systematic info on many transnational behaviours (visits, investments, etc.)
Virtually only REMITTANCE data are available
Bilateral data (from country A to country B) collected only recently from the World Bank (2010-2012)
Recent interest in single corridors (beyond the BoP approach of National Banks), no historical trends
Despite harmonisation, definitions can still vary across countries
Only formal transactions recorded
Multi-sited research to observe flows, impact and transformations from both sides;
Looking at the wider context at both ends as both conditions/ changes in CoO and CoD facilitate/ hinder/ encourage migrants’ TN activities
Comparative study of different migration corridors
only 8% of surveyed migrants and returnees did not travel in the last 2 years for contingency reasons
High education level
Self-assessed number of languages spoken high (more than 2 after migration), colonial language even at origin + English also for those outside UK
Legal status consistently improved since arrival: many citizenship acquisitions and permanent permits, even among those who entered without visa or with a tourist visa at the beginning
Dual citizenship quite high, if we consider those who declared to have it but are still in the process or had to renounce to that of origin
What aggregate flows can tell…
Macro-economic relevance
Flows usually counter-cyclical:
Inflows generally increase after shocks in the country of origin (tsunami, typhoons, wars etc.)
Outflows tend to resist also during economic crisis at destination
… And what they can not
Use of flows (daily expenditures, investments, properties etc.)
Individual share of income devoted to remittances (remittance burden)
Balance between remittances, other economic transfers and the economic participation here and there (balancing acts)
It is worth noticing that, due to sample size and quality of data (categorical, with some re-codification from qualitative responses) and the purposive (non-random) character of our sample, caution should be used when interpreting our results. Table 9 presents the list of integration and economic activity variables for which the correlation with the two indexes was found significant
: linear sum of normalized indicators, equal weighting