9. Introduction: What was the question?
Methods: How did you try to answer it?
Results : What did you find?
Discussion : What does it mean?
10. Fewest possible words that adequately
describe the contents of the paper.
It is just the first step in attracting a
potential reader so it must be chosen
with great care.
An improperly titled paper will get lost
and will never be read.
11. Neither too short nor too long (good title for a research
paper is typically around 10 to 12 words long)
Have no abbreviations or jargon.
concise, specific and informative.
Title contains:
Research problem
Research variables
Target population
Place and time
contain the keywords.
12. Majority of readers will find your
research via electronic data base
searches and those search engine rely
on keywords that found in title.
17. Research problem
Place and time
Target population
Research variables
Dental Fluorosis
Intelligence quotient
school children
Bagalkot district
in 2011
18. Ensure recognitions of the writers.
ONLY include those who have made an
intellectual contribution to the research.
OR those who have approved the final
version .
22. short , powerful , complete , concise .
contain the keywords.
provide a brief summary of each of the main sections
of the paper:
o State the research objective(question)
o scope of the investigation
o Describe the methods used
o Summarize the results
o State the principal conclusions
23. If your study was about :
randomized trial that investigates
whether X therapy improved
cognitive function in 40 dementia
patients from 6 cities in Japan; it
reports improved cognitive function.
What key word you can use?
24. You can use:
randomized trial that investigates
whether X therapy improved
cognitive function in 40 dementia
patients from 6 cities in Japan; it
reports improved cognitive function.
28. Aim of the study
Identify the questions you are answering
Related studies.
State how your work differs from published work.
Briefly describe the experiment, hypothesis, research
question; general experimental design or method
30. How did you study the problem?
What did you use?
How did you proceed?
Method
Material
Procedure
31. The source of subjects studied :
number of individuals in each group used
their gender, age, and weight .
The protocol for collecting data:
how the experimental procedures were carried
out.
How the data were analyzed.
Methods section should be written in the past
tense
33. It is the core or heart of the paper.
It needs to be clearly and simply stated.
It describe what was discovered.
It summarize the findings in an orderly
and logical sequence, without
interpretation.
34. The text should guide the reader through the
findings, stressing the major points.
Any table or figure must be sufficiently described by
its title and caption to be understandable without
reading the main text of the results section.
Should not have both a table and a figure showing the
same information.
Don`t evaluate the result in this section.
Methods section should be written in the past tense
35.
36.
37. It is interpretation of the results in
light of what was already known
about the subject of the
investigation, and to explain the new
understanding of the problem after
taking the new results into
consideration.
38. Describe what your results mean in context of
what was already known about the subject .
Often should begin with a brief summary of the
main findings
Indicate how the results relate to expectations.
Show how your results and interpretations agree
or don`t agree with previously published work.
39. Discuss the theoretical implications of your
work, and any possible practical
applications.
State your conclusions as clearly as possible.
Summarize your evidence for each
conclusion.
40. 1. If hypothesis testing was done.
was/were the hypotheses supported or not supported?
2. Are the results interpreted in the context of the
problem/purpose, hypothesis, and theoretical
framework/literature reviewed?
3. What generalizations are made? is it with the scope of
findings?
5. What recommendations for future research are stated
or implied?
41. 6. Are there other studies with similar findings?
7. What risks/benefits are involved for patients
if the research findings would be used in
practice?
8. Is direct application of the research findings
feasible in terms of time, effort, money, and
legal/ethical risks?
9. Would it be possible to replicate this study
in another clinical practice setting?
42. Any significant technical help that
Researcher have received from any
individual in lab or elsewhere.
The source of special equipment, cultures,
or any other material
Any outside financial assistance, such as
grants, contracts or fellowships.
44. It is a standardized way of acknowledging the
sources of information and ideas that you
have used in your document.
Functions:
To give credit
To add credibility
To help readers find further information
Importance of accuracy
45. Components of references :
Authors
Title
Edition number
Place of publication and publisher
Year of publication
A reference list contains only the books,
articles, and web pages etc that are cited
in the text of the document.
46. Adams, A.B. (1983a) Article title: subtitle.
Journal Title 46 (Suppl. 2), 617-619
Adams, A.B. (1988b) Book Title. Publisher, New
York.
Bennett, W.P., Hoskins, M.A., Brady, F.P. et al.
(1993) Article title. Journal Title 334 , 31-35.
50. Section purpose
Title describe the contents of the paper
Authors Ensure recognitions of the writers
Abstract Describe what was done in few words
Introduction Explain the problem
Methods explains how data were collected
Results It describe what was discovered
Discussion Discuss the implications of findings
Acknowledgments Ensures those who helped in the
research are recognized
References Ensure previously published work is
recognized
Editor's Notes
If you don`t publish your research by writing a scientic paper that mean you don`t make any thing and pepole will not care about what you did with out a scientic paper .
لتقييم الملاحظات.
لتكون متاحة للمجتمع العلمي
متاحة للالفحص المنتظم من جانب واحد أو أكثر من قواعد البيانات.
لنقل النتائج العلمية الجديدة.
The IMRAD Format for Scientific Papers
موجزة ومحددة وغنية بالمعلومات.
AIDZ HIV
SOS "Save Our Souls
It is to short , NOT specific (we cauld say in pregnant women)
not attractive.
intellectual contribution مساهمة فكرية
Describe what was done in few words
The reader can decide whether or not to read the whole article
dementia خرف
Implications اثار البحث
Describe the problem .
وصف ما تعنيه نتائجك في سياق ما هو معروف بالفعل عن هذا الموضوع.
تشير الكيفية التي ترتبط بها النتائج إلى التوقعات
إذا تم اختبار الفرضية.
كان / كانت فرضيات مدعومة أو غير معتمد؟
2. هل نتائج تفسيرها في سياق المشكلة / الغرض، الفرضية، والنظري الإطار / الأدب استعرضت؟
3. ما التعميمات مصنوعة؟ غير أنه مع نطاق النتائج؟
5. ما هي التوصيات للبحث في المستقبل وذكروا صراحة أو ضمنا؟
6. هل هناك دراسات أخرى مع نتائج مماثلة؟
7. ما هي المخاطر / تشارك فوائد للمرضى إذا كانت نتائج البحوث سوف تستخدم في الممارسة العملية؟
8. هل التطبيق المباشر للنتائج البحوث مجدية من حيث الوقت والجهد والمال، و/ المخاطر الأخلاقية القانونية؟
9. هل من الممكن لتكرار هذه الدراسة في وضع الممارسة السريرية آخر؟
عطاء الائتمان
لإضافة مصداقية
لمساعدة القراء على العثور على مزيد من المعلومات
Harvard format (the name and year system) is the most widely used.
The reference list is arranged alphabetically by author.
If an item has no author, it is cited by title, and included in the alphabetical list using the first significant word of the title.
If more than one item has the same author, list the items chronologically, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference appears on a new line.
Many authors write the abstract last so that it accurately reflects the content of the paper