Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

1. Introduction to Contracts
The Agreement: Offer
The Agreement: Acceptance
Consideration
Reality of Consent
© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

2. Capacity to Contract
Illegality
Writing
Rights of Third Parties
Performance and Remedies
© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

3. Reality of Consent
Necessity never made a good bargain.
Benjamin Franklin, 1735
© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

4. Learning Objectives
 Five doctrines that permit people to
avoid their contracts because of the
absence of real consent:
 Misrepresentation
 Fraud
 Mistake
 Duress, and
 Undue influence
13 - 4

5. Effect of The Five Doctrines
 Contracts induced by mistake, fraud,
misrepresentation, duress, or undue
influence are generally considered to be
voidable
 Person claiming non-consent has power to
rescind (cancel) the contract
 Person claiming non-consent must not act in a
manner to ratify (affirm) the contract
13 - 5

6. Misrepresentation or Fraud?
 A misrepresentation is a false statement and
may be negligent (innocent) or fraudulent
(made with knowledge of falsity and intent
to deceive)
 Either way, injured party may void (rescind)
the contract
 A person who commits fraud may be liable
in tort for damages, including punitive
damages
13 - 6

7. Elements
 Innocent or fraudulent misrepresentation:
 Defendant made an untrue assertion of fact
 Includes active concealment or non-disclosure
 Fact asserted was material or was fraudulent
 Fact is material if likely to play significant role in
inducing reasonable person to enter the contract
 Complaining party entered the contract
because of reliance on the assertion
13 - 7

8. Elements (cont.)
 Reliance of complainant
was reasonable
 Reliance means that
person entered the
contract because of
belief in the assertion
 Fifth element for fraud:
 Injury
13 - 8

9. Remedies
13 - 9

10. Jordan v. Knafel
 Facts:
 Knafel claimed she was pregnant with
Jordan’s child and Jordan offered a settlement:
 Knafel agreed to keep the situation confidential
and to refrain from filing a paternity suit
 Jordan would pay Knafel $5 million upon his
retirement from professional basketball
 After child’s birth, paternity test revealed
child was not Jordan’s
13 - 10

11. Jordan v. Knafel
 Procedural History & Issue:
 Jordan filed suit for declaratory judgment that
if an agreement had been made, it was
unenforceable for fraud and mutual mistake
 On appeal, issue was what impact the
paternity evidence had on enforceability of
alleged agreement
13 - 11

12.  Legal Reasoning & Holding:
 Fraud in the inducement of a contract is a
defense rendering the contract voidable at
the election of injured party
 Jordan’s paternity was a material fact in
settlement of Knafel’s paternity claim
 Agreement premised on fraud or mutual
mistake and thus voidable by Jordan
13 - 12

13. Mistake in Contracts
 A mistake is a belief about a fact that is not
in accord with the truth
 Mistake must relate to facts as they exist at
the time the contract is created
 Mistake not due to other party’s statements
 Mutual mistakes may be remedied by
reformation
13 - 13

14. Mistake in Contracts
 A unilateral mistake will
not render a contract
unenforceable unless
unequal bargaining position
existed
 Example: Estate of Nelson v.
Rice in which the sellers sued
buyers after buyers
recognized a profit on the sale
of estate sale paintings
13 - 14

15. Mistake
13 - 15

16. Duress
 Duress is wrongful threat
or act that coerces a person
to enter or modify contract
 Physical, emotional, or
economic harm
 Given duress, victim must
have no reasonable choice
but to enter the contract
 See Cabot Corp. v AVX Corp.
13 - 16

17. Cabot Corporation v. AVX
Corporation
 Facts:
 After long negotiation of a long-term supply
contract, parties disputed whether contract was
valid and binding contract (Cabot’s claim) or void
due to economic duress (AVX’s claim)
 The Law:
 To establish economic duress, party must show he
has been the victim of a wrongful or unlawful act
or threat, and such act or threat must be one
which deprives the victim of unfettered will
13 - 17

18. Cabot Corporation v. AVX
Corporation
 Law Applied to Facts:
 AVX and Cabot are sophisticated and substantial
commercial parties represented by highly
competent counsel
 Cabot was in stronger position than AVX, but
“hard bargaining is not unlawful”
 No evidence of coercion, but there is evidence of
AVX’s ratification
 Holding:
 Judgment affirmed in favor of Cabot
13 - 18

19. Undue Influence
 Undue influence involves
wrongful pressure exerted
on a person during the
bargaining process
 Unlike duress, pressure is
exerted through persuasion
rather than coercion
 Key is the weakness of the
person “persuaded”
13 - 19

20. Review
13 - 20

21. Test Your Knowledge
 True=A, False = B
 A contract signed under duress or undue
influence is simply void.
 A misrepresentation may be negligent
(innocent) or fraudulent.
 Mutual mistakes may be remedied by
reformation
 Duress and undue influence have the
same meaning
13 - 21

22. Test Your Knowledge
 Multiple Choice
 Elements of innocent misrepresentation:
(a) False assertion
(b) Knowingly made to induce a person to
enter a contract
(c) Reasonable reliance on the assertion by
complainant
(d) All of the above
(e) Both (a) and (c), but not (b)
13 - 22

23. Test Your Knowledge
 Multiple Choice
 A unilateral mistake will not render a
contract void unless:
(a) Substantial difference between contract and
market price
(b) Fundamental error occurred
(c) An unequal bargaining position existed
13 - 23

24. Thought Question
 Your landlord tells you
that you will be evicted
from your apartment or
your rent must increase
by $75 per month because
your neighbors complain
about your dog. If you
agree to the increase,
would the contract be
void or voidable under
the theory of duress?
13 - 24