If you have any questions or comments, please send them to connect@tracegains.com. We look forward to hearing from you.
Meeting Description:
Hazards come from two places; we add them or we receive them from our suppliers.
What should we expect from an effective supplier management program? Who is ultimately responsible for the safety of the products & materials received from our suppliers? How confident are we when we justify the control of a hazard as being through our approved supplier program? What percentage of recalls is traced to supplier issues?
HACCP requires that you:
-Identify those suppliers critical to food safety and quality
-Perform a hazard assessment and define the hazards
-Identify the potential risk and significance of the hazard
-Justify our decision based on facts, scientific information and historical data
Learn how to use your existing supplier data to:
-Automatically manage supplier compliance issues
-Continuously improve supplier performance
-Better manage supplier audits
Presenters:
Debby Newslow, President, D.L. Newslow & Associates, Inc.
Presentation: Prerequisite requirement programs for successful supplier management
Gary Nowacki, CEO, TraceGains
Presentation: Automating supplier document, risk, and compliance management
4. Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
5
Who I Am
Debby Newslow, President
D.L. Newslow & Associates, Incorporated.
– IRCA Certified Quality Assurance Lead Assessor
– Author of Dec 2013 published- Food Safety Management
Programs by CRC Press
– Author of The ISO 9000 Quality System: Applications in
Food and Technology (John Wiley & Sons Publishing)
– 2013 winner of the NSF International Leadership Award for
Training
Debby has 30 plus years experience in quality, food safety, and
basic management system (ISO, GFSI approved schemes)
covering food, beverage, chemical, packaging and other
related industries.
5. Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
6
What role does your supplier play
in your HACCP Program?
I have heard numerous times – we can’t control the
supplier so why do we need to bother with defining
requirements? They have been in business a long
time – they wouldn’t be selling their products if they
didn’t know what they were doing.
We have to trust them – we just do! Can’t risk
asking too much and then losing them. Or can we?
6. HACCP is not a stand-alone program
The production of safe food products requires that
the HACCP Program be built on a solid foundation
of prerequisite programs.
Prerequisite programs provide the basic
environment and operating conditions that are
necessary for the production of safe, wholesome
food. (quotation borrowed from NACMCF)
Things we first have to rememberabout our HACCP Programs
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
7
7. 8
Definition
A prerequisite programis a program in place that when maintained effectively will either eliminate a potential hazard or reduce it to an acceptable limit.
Failure to meet prerequisite programrequirements increases the likeliness of failure…
PRP programs must be effective!!!
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
8. Examples of HACCPPrerequisite Programs
•
Allergen Control
•
GMP/Pest Control
•
Raw Material Control System
•
Sanitation
•
Chemical Control
•
Water Treatment
•
Receiving, Storage, Distribution
•
Traceability and Recall
And our topic of the day
Supplier Management Programs
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
9. 10
Again: Why should we be concerned about our suppliers?
•
A hazard comes from two places
–
It is added during your process or
–
It is created and received from your supplier.
•
Let’s think about recent recalls….
•
60% of recalls can be traced to a supplier?
•
We don’t need to think too long to realize that this figure could actually be a low figure.
www.newslow.com
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com(12/12)
10. 11
Let’s think of some examples
•
Pet food with melamine
•
Ice cream with the wrong ingredients
•
Peanut butter (where do we start?) PCA
•
Spinach –E. Coli in the water supply
•
Aflatoxin in corn supply
•
Packaging issues such as broken glass
•
Cross contamination from shipping conditions
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
11. Protect the safety of yourproduct trust and verify
•
How do we ensure that our suppliers are not sending us food safety hazards?
•
Can this even be done?
•
Could due diligence be proved?
•
Who do we blame and does blame even matter?
•
We must be proactive!
•
No longer is the answer “this is how we have always done it”
•
Is doing the best we can enough?
Dr. Deming said that doing the best we can may not be good enough.
Henry Ford said that “Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.”
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
12. 13
Engineer out the cause…
Supplier Approval and Monitoring
•
Control the hazard before it gets to the plant
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
13. Identify food safety critical supplies
•
Ingredients
•
Primary & Secondary Packaging Materials
•
Processing Aids (lubricants, cleaning chemicals, boiler chemicals, etc.) and their purpose
•
Product contact surfaces (equipment, gaskets, etc.)
And don’t forget “service” suppliers
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
15. Critical food safety service suppliers
•
We don’t allow glass in our plant, where did that glass bottle of soda come from?
•
We have an approved chemical list, where did that bottle of glass cleaner come from?
•
We only order food grade lubricants, where did that non food grade lubricant come from and how did it get here?
•
We don’t allow allergens in the facility. Our associates are trained. They know better. Where did this come from?
What do you think the answers to these questions are?
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
16. 17
How should a supplier
be chosen and approved?
•
Choose suppliers that can meet your company needs both related to product and service requirements.
•Know your ingredient requirements including any known food safety hazards and how these are normally controlled
•Type and extent of control applied to a supplier is dependent on the effect of the purchased product on product safety, product parameters and customer specifications.
•Based on the knowledge of the operation and its product, define the criteria for selection, evaluation, and monitoring that would ensure continued compliance with the organization’s defined requirements.
•As always, maintain records that confirm compliance and effectiveness.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
17. Monitoring the supplier
•
Divide the suppliers by the area of responsibility.
•Each responsible manager should review those suppliers at a predetermined time frame (recommend annually depending on the criticalness of the item being supplied).
•Review must include any issues, nonconformances with the supplier during that time frame.
•Results must be recorded and reported to top management during the management review meeting or other top management type meeting.
•A company with a large number of suppliers could split the suppliers into different quarters for review such that all suppliers are reviewed annually.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com 18
18. 19
What if the supplier is required
by your customer –
•
Your company is still responsible to produce a safe product that meets specifications.
•Requirements for identifying and ensuring that ingredients and materials meet defined specifications related to food safety and quality must be defined and confirmed compliant. (May include temperature, seals, visual inspections, etc.)
•Requirements must be defined such that any nonconforming situation is addressed in a timely manner (i.e., rejection, product put on hold, transports rejected, etc.) based on the potential risk. Also process must ensure that the source of the item (i.e., customer buyer) is notified of the situation. Overall the process must include regularly providing a performance report to those responsible for the sourcing the item.
•“Fear factor” (making your customer mad) can not influence the decision.
•Records must be maintained.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
19. Do we treat all suppliers all equally?
•
Does every supplier have to be audited?
•This is an internal question based on the criticalness of the product being supplied.
•It is recommended that the Food Safety/HACCP Team evaluate the products being supplied related to risk and use this basis to decide what is needed to ensure its safety and continued compliance to defined parameters.
•In today’s world –more and more organizations are accepting compliance with a third party audit such as an approved GFSI food safety scheme.
But remember, understand what is required, review the approvals, certificates, audit reports, and organization’s corrective actions. Be sure results reflect a credible organization based on credible criteria.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
20
20. Effectiveness?
Measuring and ensuring the effectiveness of any PRP is a constant challenge for any organization.
Based on my experience and observed success-I recommend that the Food Safety/HACCP Team maintain a matrix that is used to track and record supplier approval and monitoring.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com 21
21. Developing and maintaining a supplier matrix is highly
recommended:
– Name of the supplier
– The product or service provided
– Brief description of the risk assessment conclusion
– A description of how the supplier is assessed
– Monitoring requirements
– Responsibility for performing monitoring
– Outcome
– Frequency
– Date performed and next date due?
This becomes an excellent record of performance and when
necessary required actions to achieve compliance.
*Quoted from Food Safety Management Programs. Debby Newslow. CRC Press 2013.
The Supplier Matrix*
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com 22
22. Common nonconformances*
•
Service suppliers are not identified
•Ingredients, packaging suppliers are provided by corporate so we don’t have to do anything.
•Issues with corporate required suppliers are not addressed because the site feels they can’t do anything about it.
•No defined program for reporting issues.
•Even with a defined program, records indicated that as long as a credit is received then reason or corrective action not important.
•Defined frequency for evaluating suppliers was not supported by records to confirm compliance.
•Suppliers used in the distant past (i.e., 3 years ago and not since) are automatically approved without any recent update or evaluation.
*Quoted from Food Safety Management Programs. Debby Newslow. CRC Press 2013.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com 23
23. Common nonconformances*
•
List of approved suppliers included the company name and not the items the supplier was approved for.
•Statement that supplier provided product per the current specification but the current specification was not available.
•Suppliers are approved based on financial status with no evaluation, defined requirements related to food safety and quality identified.
•Supplies noted in the storage areas were not sourced by a listed approved supplier with no record or explanation available to explain the situation.
•Organization’s traceability program does not include traceability (i.e. lot numbers) back to the supplier. We will hear more about this shortly.
*Quoted from Food Safety Management Programs. Debby Newslow. CRC Press 2013.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com 24
24. 25
Can your process effectively tracean issue back to the supplier?
What if a supplier contacts you with a serious food safety issue and that ingredient is already in the product on the grocer’s shelf?
–Does your lot traceability program provide the information needed to absolutely identify every finished product that contains the tainted ingredients?
–Lives could be at stake? Even if it is just a quality issue – the brand could be at stake.
–Are you sure the process works? Mock Recalls must be performed to confirm effectiveness. An emergency is not the time to find out there are flaws in your process.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
25. 26
Let’s review
•
Know your supplier,
•Know your products,
•Ensure confidence through every means possible (i.e., risk assessments) that your supplier is not sending food safety hazards with their product.
•The extent of control that you have on your supplier must be managed based on the potential risk of the product being supplied.
•Keep in mind that a large number of recalls are caused from supplier issues.
•Even the small company –MUST communicate these messages to their suppliers.
•Unfortunately, many small companies are taking the larger companies’ rejects and don’t even know it.
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com 26
26. 27
Let’s review some more……
•
Remember to maintain objective evidence of compliance (i.e., records)
•PRP programs are the foundation to an effective HACCP Program
•Never take your suppliers for granted
•Never assume food safety
•Everyone is responsible for food safety.
“Quality/food safety is like our health, we tend to take it for granted until it fails.”**
**Quoted from ASQ video “cost of poor quality”
Thank you for using the services of D. L. Newslow & Associates, Inc. www.newslow.com
27.
28. Documentation —Turning Static Data Into Information
Typical
24/7 Detection& Compliance
Automation
TraceGains
Dynamic Information
AutomaticScorecarding
Difficult to search, analyze, andtake action
Instant eNotification
Alerts
No More Spreadsheets: Documents to Data
Static Data
COAs
Supplier Documents
Finished Goods Quality
Machine Maint.
Receiving
Receiving Inspections
Lab Results
Auto. P.O. Acknowl.
Plant Floor Feedback
Finished Goods QA
COA
ActionForm™