Teacher Effectiveness                 Methodology            Text                               ADE Educator Evaluation Su...
The impact of an effective           single               is the                                       teacher            ...
60%                               Nearly                                of the impact on student achievement is attributab...
YET                                    principal                                             and                          ...
If 98% of teachers have the same rating,                               how can districts                                  ...
dual         MCESA tools serve                                                           purposes                         ...
New AZ laws require             changes•  The State Board of Education shall...”on or before December   15, 2011 adopt and...
By next year, evaluations                               must include           multiple measuresThursday, September 13, 2012
Thursday, September 13, 2012
33% - of educator                 50%   effectiveness                               must be measured by                   ...
50%                                                        School Growth                                                  ...
Small Group Calibration Exercise                     Designation   Ineffective     Partially Effective   Effective 1   Eff...
Example Learning Observation  Rating Scale...                               Score                               Descriptio...
Example Learning Observation  Rating Scale... 50% of Score                               Score                            ...
Example Growth Scale  50% of Score               Score      Growth Designation                                    Example:...
Small Group Calibration Exercise                     Designation   Ineffective     Partially Effective   Effective 1   Eff...
Merging Observation               student academic                               &                  progress...Thursday, S...
Determining tool                                  &                                scale for observationThursday, Septembe...
Selecting measures                                &                           calculations for                           s...
Appropriate                                in    values                               establishing                        ...
Observation          Instrument Quantitative Measures                      Determining Model for Overall                  ...
MCESA ToolsThursday, September 13, 2012
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Observation                      Cycle                          4 + 16 + 2 = 22Thursday, September 13, 2012
Unadjusted Rubric Weights Within REIL LOI                                   Learning Community                            ...
Unadjusted Rubric Weights Within REIL LOI                                                          22                     ...
Rubric Weights               Content Element Weights                   Learning Community                                 ...
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Peer evaluatorsThursday, September 13, 2012
Observation          Instrument Quantitative Measures                      Determining Model for Overall                  ...
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Teacher Effectiveness Methodology

448

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
448
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Teacher Effectiveness Methodology

  1. 1. Teacher Effectiveness Methodology Text ADE Educator Evaluation SummitThursday, September 13, 2012
  2. 2. The impact of an effective single is the teacher most important factor in student learningThursday, September 13, 2012
  3. 3. 60% Nearly of the impact on student achievement is attributable to principal teacher and effectiveness * New Leaders for New Schools (2009)Thursday, September 13, 2012
  4. 4. YET principal and teacher evaluation scores vary minimally failing to distinguish from great to good, good to fair, or fair to poorThursday, September 13, 2012
  5. 5. If 98% of teachers have the same rating, how can districts use evaluation data for decision making?Thursday, September 13, 2012
  6. 6. dual MCESA tools serve purposes (human resources • professional development) for principal teacher and evaluationsThursday, September 13, 2012
  7. 7. New AZ laws require changes•  The State Board of Education shall...”on or before December 15, 2011 adopt and maintain a model framework for a teacher and principal evaluation instrument that includes quantitative for schools and data on student academic progress that accounts for between thirty-three percent and fifty per cent of the evaluation districts outcomes and best practices for professional development and evaluator training. School districts and charter schools shall use an instrument that meets the data requirements established Arizona Revised Statutes by the State Board of Education to annually evaluate individual teachers and principals beginning in school year 2012 – 2013.” Thursday, September 13, 2012
  8. 8. By next year, evaluations must include multiple measuresThursday, September 13, 2012
  9. 9. Thursday, September 13, 2012
  10. 10. 33% - of educator 50% effectiveness must be measured by student academic progressThursday, September 13, 2012
  11. 11. 50% School Growth 5% Team Growth 5%40% 5% Observation 50% Individual Growth 40%Thursday, September 13, 2012
  12. 12. Small Group Calibration Exercise Designation Ineffective Partially Effective Effective 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective REIL Growth Composite Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5Thursday, September 13, 2012
  13. 13. Example Learning Observation Rating Scale... Score Description Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 1 on average (based on 5 1 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 2 on average (based on 5 2 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 on average (based on 5 3 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 and 4 on average (based on 4 5 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3, 4, and 5 on average (based 5 on 5 observations)Thursday, September 13, 2012
  14. 14. Example Learning Observation Rating Scale... 50% of Score Score Description Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 1 on average (based on 5 1 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 2 on average (based on 5 2 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 on average (based on 5 3 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3 and 4 on average (based on 4 5 observations) Teacher meets rubric criteria for level 3, 4, and 5 on average (based 5 on 5 observations)Thursday, September 13, 2012
  15. 15. Example Growth Scale 50% of Score Score Growth Designation Example: AIMs Value-Added Model Results On average, students’ AIMS scores are far below expected scores based on prior achievement, student & Well Below 1 classroom characteristics (95% statistical confidence that average growth is below the 20th percentile Expectations statewide). On average, students’ AIMS scores are below expected scores based on prior achievement, student & 2 Below Expectations classroom characteristics (95% statistical confidence that average growth is below the statewide average). Expected Growth On average, students’ AIMS scores are not statistically different from expected scores based on prior 3 (Average/Typical) achievement, student & classroom characteristics. On average, students’ AIMS scores are above expected scores based on prior achievement, student & 4 Above Expectations classroom characteristics (95% statistical confidence that average growth is above the statewide average). On average, students’ AIMS scores are above expected scores based on prior achievement, student & Well Above 5 classroom characteristics (95% statistical confidence that average growth is above the 80th percentile Expectations statewide).Thursday, September 13, 2012
  16. 16. Small Group Calibration Exercise Designation Ineffective Partially Effective Effective 1 Effective 2 Highly Effective REIL Growth Composite Rating 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5Thursday, September 13, 2012
  17. 17. Merging Observation student academic & progress...Thursday, September 13, 2012
  18. 18. Determining tool & scale for observationThursday, September 13, 2012
  19. 19. Selecting measures & calculations for student growthThursday, September 13, 2012
  20. 20. Appropriate in values establishing effectivenessThursday, September 13, 2012
  21. 21. Observation Instrument Quantitative Measures Determining Model for Overall EffectivenessThursday, September 13, 2012
  22. 22. MCESA ToolsThursday, September 13, 2012
  23. 23. Thursday, September 13, 2012
  24. 24. Observation Cycle 4 + 16 + 2 = 22Thursday, September 13, 2012
  25. 25. Unadjusted Rubric Weights Within REIL LOI Learning Community 18% Learner Engagement 18% Content 23% Instructional Strategies 27% Formative Assessment 14%Thursday, September 13, 2012
  26. 26. Unadjusted Rubric Weights Within REIL LOI 22 21 20 Learning Community = 4 Element Scores (18%) Number of Element Scores 19 18 17 16 15 Instructional Strategies = 6 Element Scores (27%) 14 13 12 11 10 Formative Assessment = 3 Element Scores (14%) 9 8 7 6 5 Content = 5 Element Scores (23%) 4 3 2 1 Learner Engagement = 4 Element Scores (18%) 0Thursday, September 13, 2012
  27. 27. Rubric Weights Content Element Weights Learning Community Conceptual Understanding Connections to Instructional Strategies 20% Content 20% Formative Assessment Content Accessibility 20% Content Task Analysis 40% Learner EngagementThursday, September 13, 2012
  28. 28. Thursday, September 13, 2012
  29. 29. Thursday, September 13, 2012
  30. 30. Thursday, September 13, 2012
  31. 31. Peer evaluatorsThursday, September 13, 2012
  32. 32. Observation Instrument Quantitative Measures Determining Model for Overall EffectivenessThursday, September 13, 2012
  33. 33. Thursday, September 13, 2012
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×