Wednesday, October 12th at 12pm EDT
Discussion with the Advocacy School's Sean Moore. Sean will share some of the benefits of advocating for a field, the challenges of doing so, and will share some examples of effective advocacy in the Canadian context.
More info @ re-code.ca/en/whats_happening/171
Listen to the webinar: https://vimeo.com/187243005
5. Two Paths of Constructive EngagementTwo Paths of Constructive Engagement
Policy EngagementPolicy Engagement
Partnering with government / practitioners or other stakeholdersPartnering with government / practitioners or other stakeholders
in:in:
1)1)defining nature and scope of challenge/problemdefining nature and scope of challenge/problem
2)2)jointly consider alternativesjointly consider alternatives
3)3)collaborate in crafting and implementing a response / solutioncollaborate in crafting and implementing a response / solution
Policy AdvocacyPolicy Advocacy
In absence of a policy engagement opportunity, an intentional,In absence of a policy engagement opportunity, an intentional,
proactive, strategic approach to gaining support for a change byproactive, strategic approach to gaining support for a change by
exploring and promoting responses that achieve your missionexploring and promoting responses that achieve your mission
while respecting needs and perspectives of decision makers andwhile respecting needs and perspectives of decision makers and
other stakeholdersother stakeholders
6. Other SettingsOther Settings
- Public Opinion / The “Media”Public Opinion / The “Media”
- Professional & Trade AssociationsProfessional & Trade Associations
- Delegated Authorities:Delegated Authorities:
- Self-Regulating BodiesSelf-Regulating Bodies
- Conservation AuthoritiesConservation Authorities
- Police CommissionsPolice Commissions
- Private and Non-Profit OrganizationsPrivate and Non-Profit Organizations
- Chambers of CommerceChambers of Commerce
- Labour UnionsLabour Unions
- Faith-Based Institutions and OrganizationsFaith-Based Institutions and Organizations
- University / College BoardsUniversity / College Boards
7. Other Types of Advocacy & EngagementOther Types of Advocacy & Engagement
Not the focus of this session, but possibly part of laterNot the focus of this session, but possibly part of later
stages of advocacy / engagement efforts:stages of advocacy / engagement efforts:
Litigation (i.e. the courts)Litigation (i.e. the courts)
Direct Action / Civil DisobedienceDirect Action / Civil Disobedience
Grass Roots AdvocacyGrass Roots Advocacy
News Media / Social Media StrategiesNews Media / Social Media Strategies
(e.g. public awareness and fund raising; promotion(e.g. public awareness and fund raising; promotion
and advertising)and advertising)
Sean – this repeats later in the deck and agenda – so either we should cut it here or just go over it very quickly, noting it will be discussed later. –Ryan
Throughout the day reference will be made to the principal means of Constructive Engagement that we will be focussing on:
Policy Engagement
And
Policy Advocacy
Policy Engagement involves the extensive participation of the decision-making body, oftentimes at its own initiative, to proactively involve a wide range of stakeholders in dealing with a challenge. Unlike traditional government “consultations” in which the government typically canvasses the views of certain stakeholders on an issue that has already been framed and defined by the government itself and is often focussed largely on something the government itself will decide and act upon, a policy engagement exercise is quite different.
Policy Engagement involves the decision-making body (government, professional association etc.) sharing with stakeholders a role in defining the very nature and scope of the challenge being faced; jointly with stakeholders (affected citizens; civil society organizations; corporate or professional interests; others governments) he issue is framed and defined, usually quite broadly to include factors which are perhaps beyond the control of government and, instead, require the involvement of other bodies . This usually then involves a collaborative, multi-government, multi-stakeholder approach to crafting and implementing a response or solution.
Policy Advocacy, which includes lobbying, most often takes place in the absence of a policy engagement opportunity. In other words, for whatever reason, the decision-making body ( a government, a licensing body or hospital) is reluctant or unwilling to undertake a policy engagement approach but is often nonetheless open to hearing argument from advocates about whether or how it should do something. But as we will suggest in today’s program, that doesn’t mean many of the same principles behind policy engagement don’t apply.
In both instances , our approach to Constructive Engagement includes:
clarifying barriers and opportunities to advancing one’s mission
understanding the priorities, beliefs, and constraints of those who you engage
taking into account the dynamics of the decision-making that one is trying to influence
There are other potential types of engagement one might encounter but we will not deal with these today except in passing though they may be quite relevant in some cases. They include:
The courts, through civil litigation
Various grass roots advocacy initiatives such as demonstrations, letter writing campaigns or what is termed advocacy advertising, typically used to stimulate public reaction
Direct action which could involve peaceful civil disobedience
And of course use of media, either traditional electronic or print news organizations or social media, employing the many tools available involving the internet
This is not to say that these are irrelevant to pursuing the sorts of objectives you are seeking, though most of these are premised differently that the Constructive Engagement we are discussing today.