ClassicPresentation evaluation form 2 page[be oxford]
1. Detailed Presentation Evaluation<br />Presenters/Group Names: ____________,______________,______________,____________,_______<br />Topic: __________________________________________________Date:_________________<br />SystemThe presenter gave a clear, interesting introduction.The presenter gave an obvious, clear conclusion and/or transition to next speaker.The presenter used detail and examples to add concreteness to the topic.The presenter used smooth connections between slides and topics.The presenter was obviously well-prepared.The presenter stayed within the time-limit.YesYesYesYesYesYesSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatNoNoNoNoNoNoNon-verbal SkillsThe presenter used eye contact to engage the audience.The presenter’s body language and gestures demonstrated enthusiasm.YesYesSomewhatSomewhatNoNoVoice and SyntaxThe presenter spoke loudly enough and at a comfortable rate.The presenter’s voice demonstrated enthusiasm and interest.The presenter’s was easy to understand.The presenter’s word’s were natural, not read.YesYesYesYesSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatNoNoNoNoVisual AidsThe slides were easy to read.The slides’ text was correct.The presenter used relevant slides.YesYesYesSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatNoNoNo<br />I especially liked: <br />Areas for improvement are:<br />Overall, I rate this presentation as: (circle one number)<br />Excellent: The presentation style reinforced the core message and added to its effectiveness. 10 9Good: The presentation style neither added nor subtracted from the accomplishment of the presenter’s goals. 8 7 6Needs Improvement: The presentation style subtracted from the goals of the presentation. 5 4 3<br />Detailed Presentation Evaluation<br />Presenters/Group Names: ____________,______________,______________,____________,_______<br />Topic: __________________________________________________Date:_________________<br />SystemThe presenter gave a clear, interesting introduction.The presenter gave an obvious, clear conclusion and/or transition to next speaker.The presenter used detail and examples to add concreteness to the topic.The presenter used smooth connections between slides and topics.The presenter was obviously well-prepared.The presenter stayed within the time-limit.YesYesYesYesYesYesSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatNoNoNoNoNoNoNon-verbal SkillsThe presenter used eye contact to engage the audience.The presenter’s body language and gestures demonstrated enthusiasm.YesYesSomewhatSomewhatNoNoVoice and SyntaxThe presenter spoke loudly enough and at a comfortable rate.The presenter’s voice demonstrated enthusiasm and interest.The presenter’s was easy to understand.The presenter’s word’s were natural, not read.YesYesYesYesSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatNoNoNoNoVisual AidsThe slides were easy to read.The slides’ text was correct.The presenter used relevant slides.YesYesYesSomewhatSomewhatSomewhatNoNoNo<br />I especially liked: <br />Areas for improvement are:<br />Overall, I rate this presentation as: (circle one number)<br />Excellent: The presentation style reinforced the core message and added to its effectiveness. 10 9Good: The presentation style neither added nor subtracted from the accomplishment of the presenter’s goals. 8 7 6Needs Improvement: The presentation style subtracted from the goals of the presentation. 5 4 3<br />