18. 714 pests in the UK Plant Health
Risk Register
(October 2014)
19. 44%
13%
6%
1%
1%
2%
1%
2%
1%
8%
11%
1%
1%
1%
2%
0%
1%
4%
Sitka spruce
Scots pine
Corsican pine
Norway spruce
Larches
Douglas fir
Lodgepole pine
Other conifers
Oak
Beech
Sycamore
Ash
Birch
Sweet Chestnut
Hazel
Hawthorn
Alder
Willow
Other broadleaves
Scotland
Stocked area by principal tree
species at March 2012
broadleaves
other conifers
Sitka
spruce
20. 44%
13%
6%
1%
1%
AOD, OPM, Chalara, SCB,
ALB, CLB, P. cinnamomi,
P. pseudosyringae
Pseudomonas spp, DED
2%
1%
2%
1%
8%
11%
1%
1%
1%
2%
0%
1%
4%
Sitka spruce
Scots pine
Corsican pine
Norway spruce
Larches
Douglas fir
Lodgepole pine
Other conifers
Oak
Beech
Sycamore
Ash
Birch
Sweet Chestnut
Hazel
Hawthorn
Alder
Willow
Other broadleaves
Scotland
Stocked area by principal tree
species at March 2012
Dothistroma
Ramorum
D. micans
P. lateralis
P. austrocedrae
Pine tree lappet
Pine beauty
Fusarium
Elatobium
Lower D. micans
risk
(?)
Ips ??
typographus
Spruce budworm
Phytophthoras
High impact
Hybrids?
21. What are we up against?
What can we do about it?
Keeping things in perspective
24. Resilience-building measures
Select the most suitable species and genotypes
Reduce other pressures on forests
Maintain or add diversity in structure and species
25.
26. Living with Environmental Change
(LWEC): Tree health and Plant
Biosecurity Initiative
• (£9.2M) 2014 -2017
• BBSRC, ESRC, NERC, Defra, FC,
Scottish Government
asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry
vegetative compatibility of fungi
botanicals and biocontrol with
entomopathogenic fungi (“lure and kill”)
genomics
protein fusion technology
Environment
Social
science
Pest Host
27.
28.
29.
30. • Review of the EU Plant Health Regime
• Expert Taskforce on Tree Health and Plant Biosecurity
• Sir Mark Walport Review
(Animal & plant health in the UK – assessment of future national capacity)
• UK Chief Plant Health Officer
• UK Plant Health Risk Register
• Scottish Tree Health Advisory Group
• Potential ‘Centre for Expertise in Plant Health’ (Scotland)
31. What are we up against?
What can we do about it?
Keeping things in perspective
32.
33.
34.
35. Irish potato famine 1845
Good design
+
Good silviculture
+
Good science
+
Annual crop yields (globally) reduced by
20-40% due to pests and diseases
(source IPCC)
36.
37. 53%
broadleaves
13%
6%
2%
4%
0%
7%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
4%
1%
0%
1%
0%
Sitka spruce
Scots pine
Corsican pine
Norway spruce
Larches
Douglas fir
Lodgepole pine
Other conifers
Oak
Beech
Sycamore
Ash
Birch
Sweet Chestnut
Hazel
Hawthorn
Alder
Willow
Other broadleaves
Scotland
Standing volume by principal
tree species at March 2012
Sitka
spruce
other conifers
Sitka
spruce
38. 53%
13%
6%
2%
4%
0%
7%
2%
2%
2%
2%
1%
4%
1%
0%
1%
0%
Sitka spruce
Scots pine
Corsican pine
Norway spruce
Larches
Douglas fir
Lodgepole pine
Other conifers
Oak
Beech
Sycamore
Ash
Birch
Sweet Chestnut
Hazel
Hawthorn
Alder
Willow
Other broadleaves
Scotland
Standing volume by principal
tree species at March 2012
AOD, OPM, Chalara, SCB,
ALB, CLB, P. cinnamomi,
P. pseudosyringae
Pseudomonas spp, DED
Dothistroma
Ramorum
D. micans
P. lateralis
P. austrocedrae
Pine tree lappet
Pine beauty
Fusarium
Elatobium
D. micans
Ips typographus
Spruce budworm
Phytophthoras
Hybrids?
Lower risk (?)
High impact
??
(62% of conifer
volume)
Who owns
the risk?