Industrial Psychology: Leadership Theories
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
722
On Slideshare
722
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
20
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Giselle M. Manabat
  • 2.  Affective Identity Motivation- they enjoy being in charge and leading others  Noncalculative Motivation- for personal gain  Social-Normative Motivation- out of sense of duty/obligation
  • 3.  High in nP and low in nAff  3 Personalities:    2   Paranoid/Passive-Aggressive- charming, quiet people but back stabber High Likability Floater- insecure, seldom rock the boat or cause trouble Narcissists- overcome insecurity by overconfidence types of leaders: Person-oriented Leader- high in Consideration Task-Oriented Leader- high in Initiating Structure
  • 4. 1. FIEDLER’S CONTIGENCY THEORY -leadership styles is effective only in certain situations. -one should understand styles of leadership rather than changing them -“Leader-Match Training”  LPC SCALE (LEAST PREFERRED COWORKER) LPC leaders= task-oriented (best in situations that are either favorable or unfavorable LPC leaders= interpersonal (moderate f)
  • 5.  Task Structuredness- goals clearly stated & known by members (tasks are standardized)  Leader Position Power- high position/ legitimate power = favorable  Leader-Member Relations- high subordinates who like leaders= favorable (support & loyalties of followers)
  • 6. 2. IMPACT THEORY  6 styles: STYLES CLIMATE Informational Style IGNORANCE Magnetic Style DESPAIR Position Style INSTABILITY Affiliation Style ANXIETY Coercive Style CRISIS Tactical Style DISORGANIZATION
  • 7. 3. HOUSE’s PATH-GOAL THEORY  4 leadership styles: (SPAID)     SUPPORTIVE STYLE- supportive relationships with subordinates PARTICIPATIVE STYLE- includes subordinates in decision making ACHIEVEMENT-ORIENTED STYLE- set challenging goals & rewards which increases performance INSTRUMENTAL STYLE- planning, organizing, provides specific guidelines & clear rules
  • 8. 3. HERSEY & BLANCHARD’s SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP THEORY  Follower Readiness- most important follower characteristic (ability & willingness to perform task)  Maturity- leaders adapting to followers  Competence & Motivation  4 Readiness & 4 Behavioral Styles
  • 9. UNABLE ABLE UNWILLING Directing R1 Supporting R2 WILLING Coaching R3 Delegating R4
  • 10.  LMX THEORY/VDL THEORY -Leader-Member Exchange or Vertical Dyad Theory -relationship between people 2 Groups:  In-group- high quality of relationship with the leader  Out-group- low quality of relationship
  • 11.  VROOM-YETTON MODEL- inclusion of group members in DM process STYLES DESCRIPTION Autocratic 1 (A1) Leader decides alone Autocratic 2 (A2) Leader gets information from members then decides alone Consultative 1 (C1) Leader shares the info. “individually” then decides alone Consultative 2 (C2) Leader shares the info. In “groups” then decides alone Group 2 Leader shares the info in group & let the group reach consensus
  • 12. MANAGEMENT BY WALKING AROUND (MBWA) -specific behavioral theory -leaders and managers are most effective when they are out of their offices, walking around
  • 13.  FRENCH 5      & RAVEN’s BASE OF POWER Basic Types of Power EXPERT- knowledgeable LEGITIMATE- on the basis of position bestowed REWARD- control financial & nonfinancial reward COERCIVE-control punishment REFERENT- lie in the positive feelings that others hold for him; obtain by complimenting others, doing favors, friendly & supportive
  • 14.  TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP -task-oriented behavior -setting goals, monitoring performance, providing consequences to success or failure 3 dimensions: 1. Contingent Reward-rewarding followers for engaging desired activities 2. Management by Exception/ACTIVE- monitor performance & take coercive action 3. Management by Exception/PASSIVE- do not actively monitor performance & take coercive actions only when necessary
  • 15.  BASS’ TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP -changing or transforming the goals, values, ethics, standards & performance of others 3 Dimensions: 1. Charisma- enthusiasm, high moral & ethical standards 2. Intellectual Stimulation- open thinking 3. Individual Consideration- encourage individual growth
  • 16.  IOWA 3  STUDIES: Kurt Lewin’s Leadership Styles leadership styles: (*LAD) LAISSEZ-FAIRE- minimize leader’s involvement in DM; allowing subordinates to make decisions with little guidance AUTOCRATIC- leader takes decision without consulting others  DEMOCRATIC- leader involves people in DM 
  • 17.  OHIO STATE STUDIES  2 Major Dimensions:  INITIATING STRUCTURE- (task-oriented) leaders define their own & their subordinates roles in achieving the group’s formal goals.  CONSIDERATION- (relationship-oriented) supportive, participative, with respect for others
  • 18.  BLAKE & MOUTON’s MANAGERIAL GRID  5 Types: (*CAMIT)  COUNTRY CLUB MANAGEMENT- low in task orientation; high in relationship orientation  AUTHORITY-COMPLIANCE- high in task orientation; low in relationship orientation  MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD- weak balance of focus  IMPOVERISHED MANAGEMENT- (lazy approach) LOW in task and relationship orientation  TEAM MANAGEMENT- HIGH in task and relationship orientation
  • 19.  RENSIS LIKERT’s LEADERSHIP STYLES  4 Leadership Styles: (*C BEAP)  CONSULTATIVE- consults subordinates but leader makes major decisions  BENEVOLENT AUTHORITATIVE- uses “rewards” to encourage others; concern + authority  EXPLOITIVE AUTHORITATIVE- uses threat “fearbased method” ; low concern for people  PARTICIPATIVE- allowing subordinates to participate in the DM
  • 20.  LORD & MAHEL’s IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP THEORY -Leadership: outcome of a perceptual process involving both leaders & subordinates -Leaders affect performance of member through behavior, traits, charisma, qualities, abilities, etc. -PROTOTYPE-mental representation of a leader -FOLLOWER’S PERCEPTION- general impression of a leader based on one’s prototype