• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
New e voting
 

New e voting

on

  • 1,781 views

h

h

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,781
Views on SlideShare
1,781
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
61
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    New e voting New e voting Presentation Transcript

    • Table of content
      ABSTRACT
      INTRODUCTION
      LITERATURE REVIEW
      RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
      ANALYSIS
      DISCUSSION
      CONCLUSION
      REFERENCES
    • ABSTRACT
      Every election process wants a standard and secured electronic system which voters will trust.
      Many systems has been developed to tackle the problems of privacy, security quality control and validation. However known of this system meet up the standard needed for a good system
    • INTRODUCTION
      A good voting system whether electronic or traditional ballots paper or mechanical devices, must be strong enough to handle wide variety of potentially fraudulent behavior
    • LITERATURE REVIEW
    • ELECTRONIC VOTING CLASSIFICATION
      Electronic voting is classified into categories: Electronic voting and counting system and the Mercury system
      Electronic voting and counting system (eVACS): This model exists where extensive independent qualification testing is used
    • Electronic voting and counting system (eVACS)
    • Mercury Method
      This model uses voter verified paper ballot (VVPB) extensively for actual counting of votes, but does implement machines for the process of casting votes. It also allows voters to check the accuracy of their votes
    • Mercury system
    • Comparison of Models
      eVACS
      Pros/Benefits
      PCs & Barcode Readers – easy to use, existing and proven technology
      Server-based – security
      Two discs – reliability, built in redundancy
      Counting Machines – fast tabulation of votes
      Duplicate Machines – quality control, supports reliability
      Mecuri Method
      Pros/Benefits
      VVPB – voter verifiability, audit capability, provide for a recount, reliability, voting process can continue on paper in the event of a power failure
      Touch screens – easy to use
      Ballot box – security.
      By summarinsing the two tethod: eVACSmodel tackles the handlings of usability, security, reliability, accuracy, and consistency. The Mercuri Method addresses verifiability, usability, and security
    • RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
      There are two approaches to research, Quantitative Research and Qualitative Research.
      Quantitative Research: These experiment are sometime referred to as true science and are used by physical scientists, although social sciences, education and economics have been known to use this type of research
      Qualitative Research: it is used to generate possible leads and ideas which can be used to formulate a realistic and testable hypothesis.
    • ANALYSIS
      There are some case which shows the defectiveness of the e-voting system.
      Florida 2002 - Hanging chads and butterfly ballots cause election unrest in many area. (Mercuri, 2003)
      California 2004 – A malfunctioned voter card encoder’s angers voters between two counties. (Mercuri, 2003)
      Indiana - Seventy-five precincts do no open on schedule due to machines failure. (“E-voting”, 2006)
      New Jersey – 104 votes were counted, but only 102 precincts exist. (“E-voting”, 2003)
    • DISCUSSION
      With everyone having access to the Internet, will e-voting move in the direction of online voting? In truth, online voting already exists. Arizona’s Democratic Party held the first binding U.S. election which voters could cast their ballots online.
    • CONCLUSION
      While studying the various electronic voting systems, it became obvious that although each system has its own strength and weakness, there are several key characteristic a good electronic voting system requires. These are: Accuracy, Convenience, Reliability, Verifiability, Flexibility , Consistency, Accessibility, Mobility, Social Acceptance, privacy, gender discrimination , Usability
      Lack of these characteristics will endanger the integrity of any election result
    • REFERENCES
      Anderson C. (2006). How to Rig a Democracy: A Timeline of Electronic Voting in the United States. The Indypendent. Retrieved November 28, 2006 from: http://www.indypendent.org/?p=608
      Bellis, M. (2007). The History of Voting Machines. Retrieved November 9, 2006 from: http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa111300b.htm
      Coggins, C. (2004) Independent of Voting Systems. Communication of the ACM, 47, 10, 34-38.
      Cranor, L.F., & Cytron, R.K. (1996). Design and Implementation of a Security-Conscious Electronic Polling System. Washington University Computer Science Technical Report (WUCS). Retrieved October 9, 2006 from: http://www.acm.org/crossroads/ords2-4/voting.html
    • QUESTIONS
      QUESTIONS
      QUESTIONS
      QUESTIONS
      QUESTIONS
      QUESTIONS
      QUESTIONS