Civic Exchange 2009 The Air We Breathe Conference - Experts Symposium 9 January 2009 The Economics of Managing Damaging Pollutants from Marine Sources presented by Terry Barket (University of Cambridge and Cambridge Econometrics) http://air.dialogue.org.hk

1. connecting you to the future
The economics of managing damaging
pollutants from marine sources
Terry Barker
University of Cambridge and Cambridge Econometrics
Overheads for Expert Symposium on Air Quality,
Hong Kong, 9 January 2009

2. Context: aviation and shipping
• International transportation
– Global and growing
– Size and effects uncertain and risks asymmetric
– Aviation is different from shipping
• Place of emissions: high versus low
• Light versus heavy loads
• Passengers versus freight
• Regulation and safety: risk to life/oil pollution
• Why air and ship including other polluting emissions
(i.e. GHGs) in GETS?
– Both are intrinsic to globalisation & trade-based growth
– Both face local congestion and pollution
– Both also pollute outside border controls, in what would otherwise be
pristine environments
– Most intractable of broad sectors (data, law, behaviour)
– CRITICAL:
• likely substantial reductions in costs if altogether in an extended
GETS: “flexibility” (time, multi-gas, and technological-option-choice)
2 of 25

3. International policy coordination
• Current policies are ripe for reform
– Systemic: pollution, congestion, noise
– Many damaging emissions are outside national borders
– National caps for GHG, SO2, NOx, not for international
emissions
– Not in Kyoto, Article 2.2
– Consensus and action difficult to achieve
– Classic example of externalities, but no taxation
• GETS
– Cap-and-trade can limit emissions equitably across operators
and countries
– Auctions yield revenues (otherwise huge profits)
– Carbon and other pollutant prices can be managed
• Post-2012 (Copenhagen COP15)
– Need to start with a global scheme, GETS is logical
– Will reveal market carbon price for decarbonisation
3 of 25

4. A Global Emissions Trading Scheme
(GETS) for international transport
• GETS is based on the design of the EU ETS for
GHGs and can be extended to include other
pollutants.
• Each phase will run for 8 years – 5 consequent
phases from 2013 to 2052
• Cap at the average level of 2004-2006 emissions in
2013, phasing out by 2052 i.e. no allocation in 2052
(net zero emissions)
• 100% auctioning & 100% revenue recycling
• Usage of credits from CDM projects: 10% of
allocation in 2013 decreasing linearly to 5% in 2052
• CDM credits are supplementary to the allocation
4 of 25

5. Outcomes
• Management of GHGs, NOx, SO2, PM
• Inducing technological change and more
investment (through carbon price and R&D
investments)
– Higher prices will not necessarily stop growth
of the sector
– New planes and ships likely to be more
generally productive and better quality
– Growth less polluting
• Funding flows from air passengers and importers
to development
5 of 25

6. Sketch of a GETS for International
Transport: Low growth scenario
GtCO2
2.500
2.000
1.500
Gt CO2
1.000
0.500
0.000
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
49
51
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
year
bau emissions credits auctioning
6 of 25

7. Sketch of a GETS for International
Transport: Low growth scenario 10%
auction revenues returned to the industry
$bn(2000)
50.00
45.00
billion USD (2000)
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
13
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
35
37
39
41
43
45
47
49
51
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
year
Low growth revenues recycled to the industry - High price
Low growth revenues recycled to the industry - Medium price
Low growth revenues recycled to the industry - Low price
7 of 25

8. Sketch of a GETS for International
Transport: Risks and opportunities
• International aviation and shipping together: lowest
and highest emissions per tonne of freight carried
• Regulatory capture
– Annex I versus Non – Annex I countries
– ICAO and IMO versus UNFCCC
– Provides opportunities for collusion and monopolistic pricing
• Institutional feasibility: will IMO, ICAO ever agree to
a scheme? National governments? (IATA supports
including aviation into an open GETS)
• Technologies may not emerge
– But wind, heat-pump, new PV materials – a technological
revolution appears to be starting
• Convenience-flag countries in shipping.
8 of 25