SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
1790 1800 1810 1820 1830
1812 18161788 1792 1796 1804 1808 1824 1828 1832 1836
During the 1790s, two parties began to form around differences of opinion
withinWashington’s cabinet. Federalists, behind Secretary of theTreasury
Alexander Hamilton, supported a strong central government that could
promote manufacturing and commerce. Supporters of Secretary of State
Thomas Jefferson, who began to call themselves Democratic-Republicans,
believed in small central government and an agricultural society.
After the Constitution was ratified,
there were no political parties.
GeorgeWashington was elected
without opposition.
The election of 1800 was a
critical moment in American
democracy — the first peaceful
exchange of power between
two parties.
The Democratic-Republicans gradually
adopted Federalist programs, including
support for manufacturing and commerce
and a stronger central government.
Federalists opposed theWar of 1812, and
the American victory cost them support.
By 1820, the Federalists could no
longer field a Presidential candidate.
James Monroe won re-election
without opposition, and the“Era of
Good Feelings”began.
In 1824, four men ran for President, all calling themselves
Democratic-Republicans. Andrew Jackson won the most
votes, but no candidate won a majority of the electoral
vote.The election went to the House of Representatives,
which chose John Quincy Adams.
By 1828, supporters of Andrew Jackson had begun
calling themselves Democrats.They wanted small
government, and they opposed trade protection,
national banks, and paper money. Supporters of
John Quincy Adams, calling themselves National
Republicans, wanted a strong central government
that would support internal improvements and
promote commerce.
In NewYork and New England, opposition to
Jackson organized the Anti-Masonic Party,
which feared the role of Freemasons in
government. In 1832, they held the first
presidential nominating convention in the U.S.
DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICAN
FEDERALIST
DEMOCRATIC
NATIONAL
REPUBLICAN
ANTI-MASONIC
WHIGJohn Quincy Adams
Thomas Jefferson
John Adams
GeorgeWashington GeorgeWashington
John Adams
Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson James Madison James Madison James Monroe
James Monroe
Charles Pinkney Charles Pinkney DeWitt Clinton Rufus King
Henry Clay
William Crawford
Andrew Jackson
Andrew Jackson
John Quincy Adams
Andrew Jackson
Henry Clay
WilliamWirt
MartinVan Buren
William Henry Harrison
Hugh LawsonWhite
DanielWebster
Willie Person Magnum
POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1788–1840
Political parties have shifted many times in 220 years of national politics. Even when parties
have kept the same names for long periods, their issues, principles, demographics, and
regional support all change over time.
This chart shows the evolution of political party systems in the U.S. since 1789. Each“party
system”is a roughly defined time period in which two major political parties, each with fairly
consistent supporters and beliefs, dominated the political scene.
The colored lines represent organized parties that had a significant impact on national
politics, electing members of Congress or receiving more than 1% of the vote for President.
Where the lines merge and split, parties split or party affiliations changed dramatically in a
short period of time.
Presidential candidates are also listed for each party, with the winning candidate in bold:
Winning CandidateCandidate
© Copyright LEARN NC 2009. May be reproduced for noncommercial purposes so long as attribution is provided, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license. Visit us on the web at www.learnnc.org.
1820 1830 1840 1850 1860
1824 1828 1832 1836 1844 1848 1852 1856
By 1820, the Federalists could no
longer field a Presidential candidate.
James Monroe won re-election
without opposition, and the“Era of
Good Feelings”began.
In 1824, four men ran for President, all calling themselves
Democratic-Republicans. Andrew Jackson won the most
votes, but no candidate won a majority of the electoral
vote.The election went to the House of Representatives,
which chose John Quincy Adams.
By 1828, supporters of Andrew Jackson had begun
calling themselves Democrats.They wanted small
government, and they opposed trade protection,
national banks, and paper money. Supporters of
John Quincy Adams, calling themselves National
Republicans, wanted a strong central government
that would support internal improvements and
promote commerce.
In NewYork and New England, opposition to
Jackson organized the Anti-Masonic Party,
which feared the role of Freemasons in
government. In 1832, they held the first
presidential nominating convention in the U.S.
By 1836, opponents of Jackson’s Democrats had
organized into theWhig Party.They opposed what
they saw as Jackson’s autocratic rule, and they
supported social, economic, and moral reforms. In
1836, they ran four regional candidates, hoping to
split the electoral vote and throw the election to the
House of Representatives, where theWhig majority
would pick a President. But their strategy failed.
The“Know-Nothing”Party organized in opposition to immigration, especially
of Catholics. At first they worked in secret, and when asked about their
activities, they replied“I know nothing.”In the 1850s, they renamed
themselves the American Party, and in 1856, with theWhig Party breaking up,
they ran Millard Fillmore for President.
The Liberty Party was organized in the 1840s
to advocate for the abolition of slavery. It had
little success but was an important forerunner
to other anti-slavery efforts.
The Free Soil Party opposed the expansion of slavery
into the western territories — a popular issue in the
wake of the MexicanWar (1846–48). Running on the
slogan“Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Labor and Free
Men,”they elected several men to Congress.
In 1854,Whigs and Free-Soilers joined forces to
create the Republican Party. Republicans opposed
the expansion of slavery and adopted a progressive
platform, supporting railroads, the growth of cities,
education, and homesteads for farmers.
Divided over the issue of slavery, theWhig party split
in the 1850s. Most NorthernWhigs joined the new
Republican Party, while many SouthernWhigs
became Democrats.The remainingWhigs ran former
President Millard Fillmore on a joint ticket with the
American Party in 1856.
In the 1850s, Democrats adopted someWhig
positions, such as support for railroads. Northern
and southern Democrats also agreed that slavery
should be permitted in the western territories. As
a result, by 1856, the Democrats were nearly the
only party in the South.
The Democrats, finally split over slavery, could
not agree on a candidate in 1860. Northern and
Southern Democrats ran separate candidates,
and their division allowed the Republicans to
capture theWhite House.
DEMOCRATIC
NATIONAL
REPUBLICAN
ANTI-MASONIC
WHIG
KNOW-NOTHING AMERICAN
LIBERTY
FREE SOIL REPUBLICAN
CONSTITUTIONAL
UNION
NORTHERN
DEMOCRATIC
SOUTHERN
DEMOCRATIC
John Quincy Adams
James Monroe
Henry Clay
William Crawford
Andrew Jackson
Andrew Jackson
John Quincy Adams
Andrew Jackson
Henry Clay
WilliamWirt
MartinVan Buren MartinVan Buren James Polk
ZacharyTaylor
Franklin Pierce
Winfield Scott
Lewis Cass James Buchanan
Henry ClayWilliam Henry Harrison
William Henry Harrison
Hugh LawsonWhite
DanielWebster
Willie Person Magnum
Millard Fillmore
James Bierney James Bierney
MartinVan Buren
John P. Hale
John C. Fremont Abraham Lincoln
Stephen Douglas
John C. Breckenridge
John Bell
A few remainingWhigs and Know-Nothings
ran John Bell on the Constitutional Union
ticket in 1860, advocating simply to keep the
Union as it was.
POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1820–1860
Political parties have shifted many times in 220 years of national politics. Even when parties
have kept the same names for long periods, their issues, principles, demographics, and
regional support all change over time.
This chart shows the evolution of political party systems in the U.S. since 1789. Each“party
system”is a roughly defined time period in which two major political parties, each with fairly
consistent supporters and beliefs, dominated the political scene.
The colored lines represent organized parties that had a significant impact on national
politics, electing members of Congress or receiving more than 1% of the vote for President.
Where the lines merge and split, parties split or party affiliations changed dramatically in a
short period of time.
Presidential candidates are also listed for each party, with the winning candidate in bold:
Winning CandidateCandidate
© Copyright LEARN NC 2009. May be reproduced for noncommercial purposes so long as attribution is provided, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license. Visit us on the web at www.learnnc.org.
Prohibition Party
Republican Party
Socialist Party of America

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

sofware libre
sofware libresofware libre
sofware libreandres852
 
Sistemas operativos Evelyn
Sistemas operativos EvelynSistemas operativos Evelyn
Sistemas operativos Evelynevelyncisneros01
 
R ou Python para análise de dados
R ou Python para análise de dadosR ou Python para análise de dados
R ou Python para análise de dadosCiência e Dados
 
Modernizar economizando
Modernizar economizandoModernizar economizando
Modernizar economizandoABEP123
 
Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)
Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)
Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)GPPlab
 
SARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional Comum
SARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional ComumSARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional Comum
SARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional ComumNITSAYURI
 
3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglês
3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglês3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglês
3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglêsJonatas Lacerda
 
Case Feira de Santana
Case Feira de SantanaCase Feira de Santana
Case Feira de SantanaABEP123
 
Relatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopes
Relatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopesRelatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopes
Relatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopesGabriella Lopes
 
Presentación3
Presentación3Presentación3
Presentación3frydagpe
 
20 claves educativas para el 2020
20 claves educativas para el 202020 claves educativas para el 2020
20 claves educativas para el 2020Gradomania
 
La educación integral
La educación integralLa educación integral
La educación integralMiVeSo
 
sofware libre
sofware libresofware libre
sofware libreandres852
 
Gaby power point trabajo
Gaby power point trabajoGaby power point trabajo
Gaby power point trabajofannylu85
 
Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...
Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...
Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...belenmaciascalvo
 

Viewers also liked (20)

sofware libre
sofware libresofware libre
sofware libre
 
Sistemas operativos Evelyn
Sistemas operativos EvelynSistemas operativos Evelyn
Sistemas operativos Evelyn
 
R ou Python para análise de dados
R ou Python para análise de dadosR ou Python para análise de dados
R ou Python para análise de dados
 
Modernizar economizando
Modernizar economizandoModernizar economizando
Modernizar economizando
 
Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)
Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)
Seminário Reforma Gerencial 20+20 | Jorge Lapas (Osasco)
 
SARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional Comum
SARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional ComumSARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional Comum
SARESP/SAEB, Fluxo, Base Nacional Comum
 
3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglês
3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglês3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglês
3 atitudes essenciais para aprender inglês
 
Case Feira de Santana
Case Feira de SantanaCase Feira de Santana
Case Feira de Santana
 
Relatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopes
Relatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopesRelatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopes
Relatório cidade const. ix gabriella lopes
 
CecíLia Meireles
CecíLia MeirelesCecíLia Meireles
CecíLia Meireles
 
Educación y su transformación
Educación y su transformaciónEducación y su transformación
Educación y su transformación
 
Plan de seguridad preventivo power poitn
Plan  de seguridad preventivo power poitnPlan  de seguridad preventivo power poitn
Plan de seguridad preventivo power poitn
 
Presentación3
Presentación3Presentación3
Presentación3
 
20 claves educativas para el 2020
20 claves educativas para el 202020 claves educativas para el 2020
20 claves educativas para el 2020
 
Trabajo colaborativo
Trabajo colaborativo Trabajo colaborativo
Trabajo colaborativo
 
La educación integral
La educación integralLa educación integral
La educación integral
 
sofware libre
sofware libresofware libre
sofware libre
 
Gaby power point trabajo
Gaby power point trabajoGaby power point trabajo
Gaby power point trabajo
 
Chnotícias4
Chnotícias4Chnotícias4
Chnotícias4
 
Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...
Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...
Furia de género: el transfeminismo como práctica política de lucha integrador...
 

Similar to Evolution of the Political Parties

Us political parties
Us political partiesUs political parties
Us political partiesSunny Arora
 
Political parties
Political partiesPolitical parties
Political partiesxime-alex
 
Differences Between Democrats and Whigs
Differences Between Democrats and WhigsDifferences Between Democrats and Whigs
Differences Between Democrats and Whigsfreealan
 
Populist party
Populist partyPopulist party
Populist partyrwfonte
 
The ulitmate history prject
The ulitmate history prjectThe ulitmate history prject
The ulitmate history prjectameix3
 
Historical Development of Political Parties
Historical Development of Political PartiesHistorical Development of Political Parties
Historical Development of Political Partiesatrantham
 
Populists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docx
Populists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docxPopulists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docx
Populists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docxharrisonhoward80223
 
Chapter 10 Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840
Chapter 10  Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840                  Chapter 10  Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840
Chapter 10 Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840 EstelaJeffery653
 
Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)
Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)
Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)Pope John Paul II High School
 
Federalists vs. Republicans
Federalists vs. RepublicansFederalists vs. Republicans
Federalists vs. Republicansreach
 

Similar to Evolution of the Political Parties (20)

2nd party system 3
2nd party system 32nd party system 3
2nd party system 3
 
Govt Chap. 16.1..
Govt Chap. 16.1..Govt Chap. 16.1..
Govt Chap. 16.1..
 
Us political parties
Us political partiesUs political parties
Us political parties
 
Political parties
Political partiesPolitical parties
Political parties
 
Political parties
Political partiesPolitical parties
Political parties
 
Jacksonian Era
Jacksonian EraJacksonian Era
Jacksonian Era
 
Differences Between Democrats and Whigs
Differences Between Democrats and WhigsDifferences Between Democrats and Whigs
Differences Between Democrats and Whigs
 
Populist party
Populist partyPopulist party
Populist party
 
Whigs Vs Democrats
Whigs Vs DemocratsWhigs Vs Democrats
Whigs Vs Democrats
 
The ulitmate history prject
The ulitmate history prjectThe ulitmate history prject
The ulitmate history prject
 
Historical Development of Political Parties
Historical Development of Political PartiesHistorical Development of Political Parties
Historical Development of Political Parties
 
Political parties
Political partiesPolitical parties
Political parties
 
Points of conflict
Points of conflictPoints of conflict
Points of conflict
 
Political parties
Political partiesPolitical parties
Political parties
 
Was the Disputed 1876 Presidential Election Valid Precedent for January 6th F...
Was the Disputed 1876 Presidential Election Valid Precedent for January 6th F...Was the Disputed 1876 Presidential Election Valid Precedent for January 6th F...
Was the Disputed 1876 Presidential Election Valid Precedent for January 6th F...
 
Populists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docx
Populists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docxPopulists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docx
Populists Elections of 1892 and 1896Presentation of this progra.docx
 
Chapter 10 Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840
Chapter 10  Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840                  Chapter 10  Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840
Chapter 10 Jacksonian Democracy, 1820–1840
 
2nd Party System
2nd Party System2nd Party System
2nd Party System
 
Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)
Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)
Chapter 5 section 3 (two party system in american history)
 
Federalists vs. Republicans
Federalists vs. RepublicansFederalists vs. Republicans
Federalists vs. Republicans
 

Recently uploaded

Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In MusinaTop^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musinadoctorjoe1984
 
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdfAnalyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdfYojana Investment
 
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdfIncome Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdftaxguruedu
 
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdfPress-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdfbhavenpr
 
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdfForbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdfUK Journal
 
Decentralisation and local government in India
Decentralisation and local government in IndiaDecentralisation and local government in India
Decentralisation and local government in IndiaTulsiTiwari4
 
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 

Recently uploaded (8)

Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In MusinaTop^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
Top^Clinic ^%[+27785538335__Safe*Women's clinic//Abortion Pills In Musina
 
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdfAnalyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
Analyzing Nepal's Third Investment Summit.pdf
 
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdfIncome Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
Income Tax Regime Dilemma – New VS. Old pdf
 
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdfPress-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
Press-Information-Bureau-14-given-citizenship.pdf
 
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdfForbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough  Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
Forbes Senior Contributor Billy Bambrough Master of Tech Journalism.pdf
 
Decentralisation and local government in India
Decentralisation and local government in IndiaDecentralisation and local government in India
Decentralisation and local government in India
 
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
13052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 

Evolution of the Political Parties

  • 1. 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1812 18161788 1792 1796 1804 1808 1824 1828 1832 1836 During the 1790s, two parties began to form around differences of opinion withinWashington’s cabinet. Federalists, behind Secretary of theTreasury Alexander Hamilton, supported a strong central government that could promote manufacturing and commerce. Supporters of Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, who began to call themselves Democratic-Republicans, believed in small central government and an agricultural society. After the Constitution was ratified, there were no political parties. GeorgeWashington was elected without opposition. The election of 1800 was a critical moment in American democracy — the first peaceful exchange of power between two parties. The Democratic-Republicans gradually adopted Federalist programs, including support for manufacturing and commerce and a stronger central government. Federalists opposed theWar of 1812, and the American victory cost them support. By 1820, the Federalists could no longer field a Presidential candidate. James Monroe won re-election without opposition, and the“Era of Good Feelings”began. In 1824, four men ran for President, all calling themselves Democratic-Republicans. Andrew Jackson won the most votes, but no candidate won a majority of the electoral vote.The election went to the House of Representatives, which chose John Quincy Adams. By 1828, supporters of Andrew Jackson had begun calling themselves Democrats.They wanted small government, and they opposed trade protection, national banks, and paper money. Supporters of John Quincy Adams, calling themselves National Republicans, wanted a strong central government that would support internal improvements and promote commerce. In NewYork and New England, opposition to Jackson organized the Anti-Masonic Party, which feared the role of Freemasons in government. In 1832, they held the first presidential nominating convention in the U.S. DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICAN FEDERALIST DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL REPUBLICAN ANTI-MASONIC WHIGJohn Quincy Adams Thomas Jefferson John Adams GeorgeWashington GeorgeWashington John Adams Thomas Jefferson Thomas Jefferson James Madison James Madison James Monroe James Monroe Charles Pinkney Charles Pinkney DeWitt Clinton Rufus King Henry Clay William Crawford Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson John Quincy Adams Andrew Jackson Henry Clay WilliamWirt MartinVan Buren William Henry Harrison Hugh LawsonWhite DanielWebster Willie Person Magnum POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1788–1840 Political parties have shifted many times in 220 years of national politics. Even when parties have kept the same names for long periods, their issues, principles, demographics, and regional support all change over time. This chart shows the evolution of political party systems in the U.S. since 1789. Each“party system”is a roughly defined time period in which two major political parties, each with fairly consistent supporters and beliefs, dominated the political scene. The colored lines represent organized parties that had a significant impact on national politics, electing members of Congress or receiving more than 1% of the vote for President. Where the lines merge and split, parties split or party affiliations changed dramatically in a short period of time. Presidential candidates are also listed for each party, with the winning candidate in bold: Winning CandidateCandidate © Copyright LEARN NC 2009. May be reproduced for noncommercial purposes so long as attribution is provided, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license. Visit us on the web at www.learnnc.org.
  • 2. 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1824 1828 1832 1836 1844 1848 1852 1856 By 1820, the Federalists could no longer field a Presidential candidate. James Monroe won re-election without opposition, and the“Era of Good Feelings”began. In 1824, four men ran for President, all calling themselves Democratic-Republicans. Andrew Jackson won the most votes, but no candidate won a majority of the electoral vote.The election went to the House of Representatives, which chose John Quincy Adams. By 1828, supporters of Andrew Jackson had begun calling themselves Democrats.They wanted small government, and they opposed trade protection, national banks, and paper money. Supporters of John Quincy Adams, calling themselves National Republicans, wanted a strong central government that would support internal improvements and promote commerce. In NewYork and New England, opposition to Jackson organized the Anti-Masonic Party, which feared the role of Freemasons in government. In 1832, they held the first presidential nominating convention in the U.S. By 1836, opponents of Jackson’s Democrats had organized into theWhig Party.They opposed what they saw as Jackson’s autocratic rule, and they supported social, economic, and moral reforms. In 1836, they ran four regional candidates, hoping to split the electoral vote and throw the election to the House of Representatives, where theWhig majority would pick a President. But their strategy failed. The“Know-Nothing”Party organized in opposition to immigration, especially of Catholics. At first they worked in secret, and when asked about their activities, they replied“I know nothing.”In the 1850s, they renamed themselves the American Party, and in 1856, with theWhig Party breaking up, they ran Millard Fillmore for President. The Liberty Party was organized in the 1840s to advocate for the abolition of slavery. It had little success but was an important forerunner to other anti-slavery efforts. The Free Soil Party opposed the expansion of slavery into the western territories — a popular issue in the wake of the MexicanWar (1846–48). Running on the slogan“Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Labor and Free Men,”they elected several men to Congress. In 1854,Whigs and Free-Soilers joined forces to create the Republican Party. Republicans opposed the expansion of slavery and adopted a progressive platform, supporting railroads, the growth of cities, education, and homesteads for farmers. Divided over the issue of slavery, theWhig party split in the 1850s. Most NorthernWhigs joined the new Republican Party, while many SouthernWhigs became Democrats.The remainingWhigs ran former President Millard Fillmore on a joint ticket with the American Party in 1856. In the 1850s, Democrats adopted someWhig positions, such as support for railroads. Northern and southern Democrats also agreed that slavery should be permitted in the western territories. As a result, by 1856, the Democrats were nearly the only party in the South. The Democrats, finally split over slavery, could not agree on a candidate in 1860. Northern and Southern Democrats ran separate candidates, and their division allowed the Republicans to capture theWhite House. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL REPUBLICAN ANTI-MASONIC WHIG KNOW-NOTHING AMERICAN LIBERTY FREE SOIL REPUBLICAN CONSTITUTIONAL UNION NORTHERN DEMOCRATIC SOUTHERN DEMOCRATIC John Quincy Adams James Monroe Henry Clay William Crawford Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson John Quincy Adams Andrew Jackson Henry Clay WilliamWirt MartinVan Buren MartinVan Buren James Polk ZacharyTaylor Franklin Pierce Winfield Scott Lewis Cass James Buchanan Henry ClayWilliam Henry Harrison William Henry Harrison Hugh LawsonWhite DanielWebster Willie Person Magnum Millard Fillmore James Bierney James Bierney MartinVan Buren John P. Hale John C. Fremont Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas John C. Breckenridge John Bell A few remainingWhigs and Know-Nothings ran John Bell on the Constitutional Union ticket in 1860, advocating simply to keep the Union as it was. POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 1820–1860 Political parties have shifted many times in 220 years of national politics. Even when parties have kept the same names for long periods, their issues, principles, demographics, and regional support all change over time. This chart shows the evolution of political party systems in the U.S. since 1789. Each“party system”is a roughly defined time period in which two major political parties, each with fairly consistent supporters and beliefs, dominated the political scene. The colored lines represent organized parties that had a significant impact on national politics, electing members of Congress or receiving more than 1% of the vote for President. Where the lines merge and split, parties split or party affiliations changed dramatically in a short period of time. Presidential candidates are also listed for each party, with the winning candidate in bold: Winning CandidateCandidate © Copyright LEARN NC 2009. May be reproduced for noncommercial purposes so long as attribution is provided, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 license. Visit us on the web at www.learnnc.org.