SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
Download to read offline
Where SOA Means Business
SOA Consortium
Enterprise Architecture of the FutureEnterprise Architecture of the Future
Current State Survey Results
Compiled by:
Ashok Kumar, Director – Services Architecture, Avis Budget GroupAshok Kumar, Director Services Architecture, Avis Budget Group
Yogish Pai, Sr. Director, Technology, BEA Systems, Inc.
Page: 1
©2007 Object Management Group
Enterprise Architecture Current State Survey Key
Findingsg
1. CIO's have started reporting to the CEO
– IT is now getting a seat at the table for business
disc ssionsdiscussions
2. Outsourcing is now a reality
– IT organizations are now outsourcing multiple aspects ofg g p p
the business
3. SOA is a major initiative for most of the
organizationsorganizations
– SOA Reference Architectures, Governance, Pilot Project,
are all in various stages of their lifecycle
4 I f i EA d SOA id ti l4. Issues facing EA and SOA are identical
Page: 2
©2007 Object Management Group
State of EA
1. EA teams have high levels of Technology, Data, and
Application Architecture skills
2. EA teams have medium to high levels of Business
Architecture skills most of time
3. Most EA teams are at a Medium level of maturity – 42%
4. Most EA teams are in the process of defining Reference
Architecture – 45%
5. Most EA teams are in the process of defining Governance –
60%60%
6. Getting “Business Buy In” and “Business to Focus on EA” are
the 2 biggest challenges – Approx 70%
Page: 3
©2007 Object Management Group
the 2 biggest challenges – Approx 70%
State of SOA
1. Most organizations are at Low level of maturity
scale – 46%. 21% consider them at High level of
t itmaturity curve
2. Majority of organizations are in the process of
defining SOA Reference Architecture – 53%. 44%
have it fully or partially deployed.
3. Majority of organization are in the process of
defining SOA Governance – 75%
4. Getting “Business Buy In” and “Business to Focus
on SOA” are the 2 biggest challenges – Approx 55%
Page: 4
©2007 Object Management Group
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
hitects
TOTAL
• Enterprise Architects were the
primary respondents of the
Survey (80%)
15+
A
rchit
TOTAL
Public
SOA-C
• 70% of SOA Consortium
respondents had over 15 years
of experience
C d t 50% f th P bli
(Results in %)
0 50 100
– Compared to 50% for the Public
responses
Other • Industry Distribution
Hi-Tech
Travel
Other
TOTAL
Public
SOA C
Industry Distribution
– Financial Service: 50%
response from SOA Consortium
– Health Care: 8% from the public
( f SOA C ti )
0 20 40 60
FS
Health
SOA-C (none from SOA Consortium)
– Telecommunications was the
highest in the others category
(7% overall)
(Results in %)
Page: 5
©2007 Object Management Group
0 20 40 60
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
• Majority of the public
responses were from smaller
companiescompanies
– 41% responses were from
companies with revenues
less than $500 Million60
70
80
compared to 0% from SOA
Consortium
• Majority of the SOA
C ti
20
30
40
50
SOAC
Public
TOTAL
Consortium responses were
from companies with
revenue over $ 5 Billion
(75%)
<$500M
< $ 1 B
< $ 5 B
$ B
SOAC
Public
TOTAL
0
10
20
(Results in %)
(75%)< $ 5 B
> $ 5 B
Page: 6
©2007 Object Management Group
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
CIO Profile
• Nearly 50% of the CIO report to the
CEO
– Large percentage based on public
responses where majority of the
companies with revenue less than $companies with revenue less than $
500 Million
– Most of CIO’s of SOA Consortium
respondents report equally to CEO
or COO (which is surprising,
especially as most CIO’s in the
CFO
p y
industry report to CFOs) - Indication
that successful adopters of SOA
have already made the business
transformation
Other
CEO
Public
SOA-C
(Results in %)
• IT leader is a CIO in over 90% of
time
• CIOs are from a technology
0 20 40 60 80
COO
(Results in %)
• CIOs are from a technology
background(70%) with operational
focus (52%) in majority of cases
• IT Culture is “Decision by
C itt ” (45%) i t
Page: 7
©2007 Object Management Group
Committee” (45%) in most cases
with “Open to Change” close
second (29%)
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Outsourced Functions
35
40
45
20
25
30
SOA-C
Public
(R lt i %)
0
5
10
15
k h
(Results in %)
• 75% of SOA Consortium respondents have outsourced one of the aspects
• 50% of the Public respondents have outsourced one of the aspects
• Most of the SOA Consortium respondents have prioritized Development
Data
Center
Dev. Support Network Other
• Most of the SOA Consortium respondents have prioritized Development,
Support and Data Center for outsourcing
– Trend: Lack of confidence by large corporations to outsource the Data Centers
and Networks
• Most of the public respondents (where 50% had less than $ 500 Million
revenue) have prioritized out sourcing Network Data Center and Support
Page: 8
©2007 Object Management Group
revenue) have prioritized out sourcing Network, Data Center and Support
– Trend: Newly created companies are open to out sourcing network and data
center (considered as commodity services)
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Architecture Functions Organization structureg
Other
VP
Public
SOA-C
(Results in %)
CIO
(Results in %)
0 10 20 30 40 50
• Majority of the early adopters (SOA Consortium) have the enterprise
architecture teams reporting to VP of Architecture or VP of Applications
• Approximately 25% of all Enterprise Architecture teams reports to the CIOApproximately 25% of all Enterprise Architecture teams reports to the CIO
• The size of EA team varies between a low of 2 to a high of 100
• Most EA teams possess Medium to High levels of business competency.
• In majority of cases (56%) EA function is centralized.
• 40% of Public respondents have a centralized EA teams compared to 70% of
Page: 9
©2007 Object Management Group
40% of Public respondents have a centralized EA teams compared to 70% of
SOA Consortium Respondent
• 20% of Public respondents have a federated EA teams compared to 15% of
SOA Consortium Respondents
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Business Competency Maturityp y y
High
Medium
TOTAL
Public
SOA-C
Low
SOA C
(Results in %)
0 20 40 60 80
• The Public has higher confidence in Enterprise Architects havingThe Public has higher confidence in Enterprise Architects having
business competency than the SOA Consortium members
– Large vs. Medium Enterprises
• Majority of the SOA Consortium members believe that their enterprise
architecture teams have average business competency
N t 80% f ll d t t i hit t d t d t i
Page: 10
©2007 Object Management Group
– Note: 80% of all respondents were enterprise architects and may tend to view
themselves in favorable light
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
EA Influence
• 100% of the SOA Consortium respondents agree that
they are influencers
70% of EA teams influences the development standards– 70% of EA teams influences the development standards.
– EA Only enforces development standards in 25% of the
time.
– Enforcement of SDLC methodology only occurs less thanEnforcement of SDLC methodology only occurs less than
20% of time.
– EA influences SDLC methodology in majority of time – 67% .
– EA is the decision maker of Development Standards in 54%EA is the decision maker of Development Standards in 54%
of time.
• 50% of the EA teams are responsible are empowered
to make software tools decisionsto make software tools decisions
– EA decide the development tools selection in 54% time and
influences 54% of time – overlap.
Page: 11
©2007 Object Management Group
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Development and Delivery Responsibilitiesp y p
Define SOA
Framework
Design SOA
Framework
Develop SOA
Framework
TOTAL
Public
SOA-C
Support SOA
Framework
Dev Team
independent of
EA team SO C
Dotted line to
EA
Dedicated EA
Resources
(Results in %)
0 20 40 60 80
Other
Page: 12
©2007 Object Management Group
• In majority of the cases the Enterprise Architecture team is responsible
for defining, designing and developing the SOA Framework
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Evaluation and Participation in Standards/Forumsp
Stds.
Contributor
TOTAL
Stds. Observer
Participate in
Industry
F
Public
SOA-C
Forums
Observer of
Industry
Forums
(R lt i %)Dedicated
Resources to
Standards
Dedicated
resources to
(Results in %)
0 20 40 60 80
std. bodies
• Majority of the respondents have resources observing the various
Page: 13
©2007 Object Management Group
Majority of the respondents have resources observing the various
standards and industry bodies
• SOA Consortium members have dedicated resources participating in
standards and industry forums
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Involvement in the Proof-Of-Conceptsp
Manage the
PoC
TOTAL
Define Tech.
Requirements
Define
Business
R i t
Public
SOA-C
Requirements
Evaluate the
results
(R lt i %)Recommend
approach
Make decision
(Results in %)
0 50 100
• Majority of the respondents are responsible for managing, defining,
evaluating and recommending the solution based on the Proof-of-
Page: 14
©2007 Object Management Group
evaluating and recommending the solution based on the Proof of
concept
• Enterprise Architecture teams of SOA Consortium members have more
influence than the Public
– Larger enterprises tend to empower the Enterprise Architecture teams
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Involved in Business Process discussions
• Enterprise Architecture
teams are involved in most
Yes
TOTOAL
teams are involved in most
of the Business Process
discussions within IT
m
es
N
o
Public
SOA-C
(Results in %)
0 20 40 60
Som
etimN
o
Yes
TOTOAL
Public
SOA-C
• Enterprise Architecture
teams are not as involved in
the business process
f O
0 10 20 30 40
Som
etim
es
N
SOA C
discussions of LOB
(Results in %)
Page: 15
©2007 Object Management Group
S
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Skills within EA
Data
Architecture
Low
Application
Architecture
Technology
Architecture
Medium
High
Architecture
Operations
Architecture
(R lt i %)Business
Architecture
Information
Architecture
(Results in %)
0 50 100
• Enterprise Architecture teams have high competency in Technology
Page: 16
©2007 Object Management Group
Enterprise Architecture teams have high competency in Technology.
Application and Data Architecture
• Enterprise Architecture teams have low competency in Business,
Information and Operations Architecture
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Comparing EA with SOAp g
EA Low
M di
• The level of maturity
of Enterprise
Architecture is
SOA
Medium
High
c tectu e s
better than that of
SOA
(Results in %)
0 50
• SOA has made
better progress than
Enterprise
Architecture (w r t
Defined RA
Defining RA
EA Architecture (w.r.t.
technology)
Pilot Project Underway
Partial implementation
Mature implementation
SOA
(Results in %)
Page: 17
©2007 Object Management Group
0 50 100
Enterprise Architecture of the Future
Comparing EA with SOAp g
EA
Implemented
D fi d
• Majority of the
enterprises are
currently defining
SOA
Defined
Defining
cu e t y de g
the governance –
both of EA and SOA
• Governance is still a
major issue
(Results in %)
0 50 100
Business buy in
Business to focus on EA/SOA
Seat at the table for
business discussions
LOB-IT Ignoring EA/SOA
y
EA
SOA
• The issues facing
EA and SOA are
identical
Governance
Funding
Technology
SOA
(Results in %)
Page: 18
©2007 Object Management Group
0 50 100
Where SOA Means Business
Thank YouThank You
Ashok Kumar, Director - Services Architecture, Avis Budget Group
Yogish Pai, Sr. Director, Technology, BEA Systems, Inc.
Page: 19
©2007 Object Management Group

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Mapa trampas psicologicas
Mapa trampas psicologicasMapa trampas psicologicas
Mapa trampas psicologicasmarielexs
 
The Ultimate Aeolian Journey
The Ultimate Aeolian JourneyThe Ultimate Aeolian Journey
The Ultimate Aeolian JourneyPiero Moschetta
 
kanji vala cv October 2016
kanji vala cv October 2016kanji vala cv October 2016
kanji vala cv October 2016Kanji Vala
 
Equipo 6 Sahagún
Equipo 6   SahagúnEquipo 6   Sahagún
Equipo 6 Sahagúnyarimelo
 
MANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZA
MANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZAMANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZA
MANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZAjose arreaza
 
Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2
Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2
Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2quintosancho
 
Ingenieria genetica y clonacion humana
Ingenieria genetica  y clonacion humanaIngenieria genetica  y clonacion humana
Ingenieria genetica y clonacion humanarojassuhail
 
Almacenamiento 2
Almacenamiento 2Almacenamiento 2
Almacenamiento 2leslinu_17
 
Mallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_jul
Mallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_julMallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_jul
Mallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_julMiguel Vilela
 
Our continuous delivery journey
Our continuous delivery journeyOur continuous delivery journey
Our continuous delivery journeySuzie Prince
 
Batería de evaluación diagnóstica
Batería de evaluación diagnósticaBatería de evaluación diagnóstica
Batería de evaluación diagnósticavero_chile
 
workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie
workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie
workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie Jeroen Meliëzer
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Collectivistic cultures
Collectivistic culturesCollectivistic cultures
Collectivistic cultures
 
Mapa trampas psicologicas
Mapa trampas psicologicasMapa trampas psicologicas
Mapa trampas psicologicas
 
The Ultimate Aeolian Journey
The Ultimate Aeolian JourneyThe Ultimate Aeolian Journey
The Ultimate Aeolian Journey
 
Assisi
AssisiAssisi
Assisi
 
kanji vala cv October 2016
kanji vala cv October 2016kanji vala cv October 2016
kanji vala cv October 2016
 
Equipo 6 Sahagún
Equipo 6   SahagúnEquipo 6   Sahagún
Equipo 6 Sahagún
 
Presentacion precios
Presentacion preciosPresentacion precios
Presentacion precios
 
MANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZA
MANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZAMANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZA
MANEJO DE MATERIALES DE SUSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS JOSE ARREAZA
 
Revista Digital
Revista DigitalRevista Digital
Revista Digital
 
Plan estrategico tic.
Plan estrategico tic.Plan estrategico tic.
Plan estrategico tic.
 
Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2
Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2
Somos un ejemplo a seguir 2
 
Ingenieria genetica y clonacion humana
Ingenieria genetica  y clonacion humanaIngenieria genetica  y clonacion humana
Ingenieria genetica y clonacion humana
 
Himabindu
HimabinduHimabindu
Himabindu
 
Almacenamiento 2
Almacenamiento 2Almacenamiento 2
Almacenamiento 2
 
Mallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_jul
Mallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_julMallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_jul
Mallas bachilleratos tecnicos_06_jul
 
Our continuous delivery journey
Our continuous delivery journeyOur continuous delivery journey
Our continuous delivery journey
 
Batería de evaluación diagnóstica
Batería de evaluación diagnósticaBatería de evaluación diagnóstica
Batería de evaluación diagnóstica
 
Practica comunitaria
Practica comunitariaPractica comunitaria
Practica comunitaria
 
workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie
workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie
workshop Evidence Based Talent & Motivatie
 
Banco Mundial titulado Commodities Markets Outlook
Banco Mundial titulado Commodities Markets Outlook Banco Mundial titulado Commodities Markets Outlook
Banco Mundial titulado Commodities Markets Outlook
 

Similar to EA_2010_Survey_Results.290212813

SOAWave.290214054
SOAWave.290214054SOAWave.290214054
SOAWave.290214054ypai
 
Application Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the Challenges
Application Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the ChallengesApplication Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the Challenges
Application Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the ChallengesHenry Chandra
 
The Organizational Soa Roadmap
The Organizational Soa RoadmapThe Organizational Soa Roadmap
The Organizational Soa RoadmapTerry Cho
 
Keys To Successful Governance with SOA
Keys To Successful Governance with SOAKeys To Successful Governance with SOA
Keys To Successful Governance with SOANathaniel Palmer
 
Techweb State Of Soa Research
Techweb State Of Soa ResearchTechweb State Of Soa Research
Techweb State Of Soa Researchguestee4e08
 
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government AgenciesMaking SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government AgenciesNathaniel Palmer
 
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government AgenciesMaking SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government AgenciesNathaniel Palmer
 
TASSCC Presentation.ppt
TASSCC Presentation.pptTASSCC Presentation.ppt
TASSCC Presentation.pptpkumars
 
Ontology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3day
Ontology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3dayOntology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3day
Ontology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3dayBrian K. Seitz
 
CMG2006.290213504
CMG2006.290213504CMG2006.290213504
CMG2006.290213504ypai
 
ARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry Forum
ARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry ForumARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry Forum
ARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry ForumARC Advisory Group
 
Data + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital Transformation
Data + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital TransformationData + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital Transformation
Data + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital TransformationEnterprise Management Associates
 
Dzr guide to_enterprise_integration
Dzr guide to_enterprise_integrationDzr guide to_enterprise_integration
Dzr guide to_enterprise_integrationHamed Hatami
 
Why Modern Systems Require a New Approach to Observability
Why Modern Systems Require a New Approach to ObservabilityWhy Modern Systems Require a New Approach to Observability
Why Modern Systems Require a New Approach to ObservabilityEnterprise Management Associates
 

Similar to EA_2010_Survey_Results.290212813 (20)

SOA - Make your CEO Happy
SOA - Make your CEO HappySOA - Make your CEO Happy
SOA - Make your CEO Happy
 
SOAWave.290214054
SOAWave.290214054SOAWave.290214054
SOAWave.290214054
 
Application Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the Challenges
Application Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the ChallengesApplication Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the Challenges
Application Integration Architecture of Excellence - Answering to the Challenges
 
The Organizational Soa Roadmap
The Organizational Soa RoadmapThe Organizational Soa Roadmap
The Organizational Soa Roadmap
 
Keys To Successful Governance with SOA
Keys To Successful Governance with SOAKeys To Successful Governance with SOA
Keys To Successful Governance with SOA
 
Use the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture Clash
Use the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture ClashUse the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture Clash
Use the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture Clash
 
Techweb State Of Soa Research
Techweb State Of Soa ResearchTechweb State Of Soa Research
Techweb State Of Soa Research
 
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government AgenciesMaking SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
 
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government AgenciesMaking SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
Making SOA a Reality for Federal Government Agencies
 
TASSCC Presentation.ppt
TASSCC Presentation.pptTASSCC Presentation.ppt
TASSCC Presentation.ppt
 
Ontology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3day
Ontology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3dayOntology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3day
Ontology and taxonomy creation presented dc 3day
 
CMG2006.290213504
CMG2006.290213504CMG2006.290213504
CMG2006.290213504
 
ARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry Forum
ARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry ForumARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry Forum
ARC's Sid Snitkin's ALM Presentation from ARC's 2008 Industry Forum
 
W
WW
W
 
Data-Driven IT Automation: A Vision for the Modern CIO
Data-Driven IT Automation: A Vision for the Modern CIOData-Driven IT Automation: A Vision for the Modern CIO
Data-Driven IT Automation: A Vision for the Modern CIO
 
Are you ready for the transformation
Are you ready for the transformationAre you ready for the transformation
Are you ready for the transformation
 
Data + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital Transformation
Data + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital TransformationData + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital Transformation
Data + Analytics: Turning the Corner on IT Chaos for Digital Transformation
 
Dzr guide to_enterprise_integration
Dzr guide to_enterprise_integrationDzr guide to_enterprise_integration
Dzr guide to_enterprise_integration
 
Soa By The Numbers
Soa By The NumbersSoa By The Numbers
Soa By The Numbers
 
Why Modern Systems Require a New Approach to Observability
Why Modern Systems Require a New Approach to ObservabilityWhy Modern Systems Require a New Approach to Observability
Why Modern Systems Require a New Approach to Observability
 

More from ypai

IN_White_Paper.290215145
IN_White_Paper.290215145IN_White_Paper.290215145
IN_White_Paper.290215145ypai
 
uma.290215118
uma.290215118uma.290215118
uma.290215118ypai
 
IN_TECH.290215048
IN_TECH.290215048IN_TECH.290215048
IN_TECH.290215048ypai
 
myBEAEIS.290214921
myBEAEIS.290214921myBEAEIS.290214921
myBEAEIS.290214921ypai
 
adopt_soa.94145841
adopt_soa.94145841adopt_soa.94145841
adopt_soa.94145841ypai
 
BEA_IT_cs1.290214856
BEA_IT_cs1.290214856BEA_IT_cs1.290214856
BEA_IT_cs1.290214856ypai
 
BEAPressReleases.290214504
BEAPressReleases.290214504BEAPressReleases.290214504
BEAPressReleases.290214504ypai
 
IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544
IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544
IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544ypai
 
BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359
BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359
BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359ypai
 
GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955
GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955
GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955ypai
 
CDI-MDMSummit.290213824
CDI-MDMSummit.290213824CDI-MDMSummit.290213824
CDI-MDMSummit.290213824ypai
 
BOral205012007.290213247
BOral205012007.290213247BOral205012007.290213247
BOral205012007.290213247ypai
 
SOAPGPart4.40203134
SOAPGPart4.40203134SOAPGPart4.40203134
SOAPGPart4.40203134ypai
 
SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900
SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900
SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900ypai
 

More from ypai (14)

IN_White_Paper.290215145
IN_White_Paper.290215145IN_White_Paper.290215145
IN_White_Paper.290215145
 
uma.290215118
uma.290215118uma.290215118
uma.290215118
 
IN_TECH.290215048
IN_TECH.290215048IN_TECH.290215048
IN_TECH.290215048
 
myBEAEIS.290214921
myBEAEIS.290214921myBEAEIS.290214921
myBEAEIS.290214921
 
adopt_soa.94145841
adopt_soa.94145841adopt_soa.94145841
adopt_soa.94145841
 
BEA_IT_cs1.290214856
BEA_IT_cs1.290214856BEA_IT_cs1.290214856
BEA_IT_cs1.290214856
 
BEAPressReleases.290214504
BEAPressReleases.290214504BEAPressReleases.290214504
BEAPressReleases.290214504
 
IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544
IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544
IEEE-SCCPresentation.290214544
 
BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359
BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359
BEA_SOA_Domains_WP.290214359
 
GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955
GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955
GoogleQuoteWSJ.290213955
 
CDI-MDMSummit.290213824
CDI-MDMSummit.290213824CDI-MDMSummit.290213824
CDI-MDMSummit.290213824
 
BOral205012007.290213247
BOral205012007.290213247BOral205012007.290213247
BOral205012007.290213247
 
SOAPGPart4.40203134
SOAPGPart4.40203134SOAPGPart4.40203134
SOAPGPart4.40203134
 
SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900
SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900
SOAPOpinion_BusinessArchitecture.49175900
 

EA_2010_Survey_Results.290212813

  • 1. Where SOA Means Business SOA Consortium Enterprise Architecture of the FutureEnterprise Architecture of the Future Current State Survey Results Compiled by: Ashok Kumar, Director – Services Architecture, Avis Budget GroupAshok Kumar, Director Services Architecture, Avis Budget Group Yogish Pai, Sr. Director, Technology, BEA Systems, Inc. Page: 1 ©2007 Object Management Group
  • 2. Enterprise Architecture Current State Survey Key Findingsg 1. CIO's have started reporting to the CEO – IT is now getting a seat at the table for business disc ssionsdiscussions 2. Outsourcing is now a reality – IT organizations are now outsourcing multiple aspects ofg g p p the business 3. SOA is a major initiative for most of the organizationsorganizations – SOA Reference Architectures, Governance, Pilot Project, are all in various stages of their lifecycle 4 I f i EA d SOA id ti l4. Issues facing EA and SOA are identical Page: 2 ©2007 Object Management Group
  • 3. State of EA 1. EA teams have high levels of Technology, Data, and Application Architecture skills 2. EA teams have medium to high levels of Business Architecture skills most of time 3. Most EA teams are at a Medium level of maturity – 42% 4. Most EA teams are in the process of defining Reference Architecture – 45% 5. Most EA teams are in the process of defining Governance – 60%60% 6. Getting “Business Buy In” and “Business to Focus on EA” are the 2 biggest challenges – Approx 70% Page: 3 ©2007 Object Management Group the 2 biggest challenges – Approx 70%
  • 4. State of SOA 1. Most organizations are at Low level of maturity scale – 46%. 21% consider them at High level of t itmaturity curve 2. Majority of organizations are in the process of defining SOA Reference Architecture – 53%. 44% have it fully or partially deployed. 3. Majority of organization are in the process of defining SOA Governance – 75% 4. Getting “Business Buy In” and “Business to Focus on SOA” are the 2 biggest challenges – Approx 55% Page: 4 ©2007 Object Management Group
  • 5. Enterprise Architecture of the Future hitects TOTAL • Enterprise Architects were the primary respondents of the Survey (80%) 15+ A rchit TOTAL Public SOA-C • 70% of SOA Consortium respondents had over 15 years of experience C d t 50% f th P bli (Results in %) 0 50 100 – Compared to 50% for the Public responses Other • Industry Distribution Hi-Tech Travel Other TOTAL Public SOA C Industry Distribution – Financial Service: 50% response from SOA Consortium – Health Care: 8% from the public ( f SOA C ti ) 0 20 40 60 FS Health SOA-C (none from SOA Consortium) – Telecommunications was the highest in the others category (7% overall) (Results in %) Page: 5 ©2007 Object Management Group 0 20 40 60
  • 6. Enterprise Architecture of the Future • Majority of the public responses were from smaller companiescompanies – 41% responses were from companies with revenues less than $500 Million60 70 80 compared to 0% from SOA Consortium • Majority of the SOA C ti 20 30 40 50 SOAC Public TOTAL Consortium responses were from companies with revenue over $ 5 Billion (75%) <$500M < $ 1 B < $ 5 B $ B SOAC Public TOTAL 0 10 20 (Results in %) (75%)< $ 5 B > $ 5 B Page: 6 ©2007 Object Management Group
  • 7. Enterprise Architecture of the Future CIO Profile • Nearly 50% of the CIO report to the CEO – Large percentage based on public responses where majority of the companies with revenue less than $companies with revenue less than $ 500 Million – Most of CIO’s of SOA Consortium respondents report equally to CEO or COO (which is surprising, especially as most CIO’s in the CFO p y industry report to CFOs) - Indication that successful adopters of SOA have already made the business transformation Other CEO Public SOA-C (Results in %) • IT leader is a CIO in over 90% of time • CIOs are from a technology 0 20 40 60 80 COO (Results in %) • CIOs are from a technology background(70%) with operational focus (52%) in majority of cases • IT Culture is “Decision by C itt ” (45%) i t Page: 7 ©2007 Object Management Group Committee” (45%) in most cases with “Open to Change” close second (29%)
  • 8. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Outsourced Functions 35 40 45 20 25 30 SOA-C Public (R lt i %) 0 5 10 15 k h (Results in %) • 75% of SOA Consortium respondents have outsourced one of the aspects • 50% of the Public respondents have outsourced one of the aspects • Most of the SOA Consortium respondents have prioritized Development Data Center Dev. Support Network Other • Most of the SOA Consortium respondents have prioritized Development, Support and Data Center for outsourcing – Trend: Lack of confidence by large corporations to outsource the Data Centers and Networks • Most of the public respondents (where 50% had less than $ 500 Million revenue) have prioritized out sourcing Network Data Center and Support Page: 8 ©2007 Object Management Group revenue) have prioritized out sourcing Network, Data Center and Support – Trend: Newly created companies are open to out sourcing network and data center (considered as commodity services)
  • 9. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Architecture Functions Organization structureg Other VP Public SOA-C (Results in %) CIO (Results in %) 0 10 20 30 40 50 • Majority of the early adopters (SOA Consortium) have the enterprise architecture teams reporting to VP of Architecture or VP of Applications • Approximately 25% of all Enterprise Architecture teams reports to the CIOApproximately 25% of all Enterprise Architecture teams reports to the CIO • The size of EA team varies between a low of 2 to a high of 100 • Most EA teams possess Medium to High levels of business competency. • In majority of cases (56%) EA function is centralized. • 40% of Public respondents have a centralized EA teams compared to 70% of Page: 9 ©2007 Object Management Group 40% of Public respondents have a centralized EA teams compared to 70% of SOA Consortium Respondent • 20% of Public respondents have a federated EA teams compared to 15% of SOA Consortium Respondents
  • 10. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Business Competency Maturityp y y High Medium TOTAL Public SOA-C Low SOA C (Results in %) 0 20 40 60 80 • The Public has higher confidence in Enterprise Architects havingThe Public has higher confidence in Enterprise Architects having business competency than the SOA Consortium members – Large vs. Medium Enterprises • Majority of the SOA Consortium members believe that their enterprise architecture teams have average business competency N t 80% f ll d t t i hit t d t d t i Page: 10 ©2007 Object Management Group – Note: 80% of all respondents were enterprise architects and may tend to view themselves in favorable light
  • 11. Enterprise Architecture of the Future EA Influence • 100% of the SOA Consortium respondents agree that they are influencers 70% of EA teams influences the development standards– 70% of EA teams influences the development standards. – EA Only enforces development standards in 25% of the time. – Enforcement of SDLC methodology only occurs less thanEnforcement of SDLC methodology only occurs less than 20% of time. – EA influences SDLC methodology in majority of time – 67% . – EA is the decision maker of Development Standards in 54%EA is the decision maker of Development Standards in 54% of time. • 50% of the EA teams are responsible are empowered to make software tools decisionsto make software tools decisions – EA decide the development tools selection in 54% time and influences 54% of time – overlap. Page: 11 ©2007 Object Management Group
  • 12. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Development and Delivery Responsibilitiesp y p Define SOA Framework Design SOA Framework Develop SOA Framework TOTAL Public SOA-C Support SOA Framework Dev Team independent of EA team SO C Dotted line to EA Dedicated EA Resources (Results in %) 0 20 40 60 80 Other Page: 12 ©2007 Object Management Group • In majority of the cases the Enterprise Architecture team is responsible for defining, designing and developing the SOA Framework
  • 13. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Evaluation and Participation in Standards/Forumsp Stds. Contributor TOTAL Stds. Observer Participate in Industry F Public SOA-C Forums Observer of Industry Forums (R lt i %)Dedicated Resources to Standards Dedicated resources to (Results in %) 0 20 40 60 80 std. bodies • Majority of the respondents have resources observing the various Page: 13 ©2007 Object Management Group Majority of the respondents have resources observing the various standards and industry bodies • SOA Consortium members have dedicated resources participating in standards and industry forums
  • 14. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Involvement in the Proof-Of-Conceptsp Manage the PoC TOTAL Define Tech. Requirements Define Business R i t Public SOA-C Requirements Evaluate the results (R lt i %)Recommend approach Make decision (Results in %) 0 50 100 • Majority of the respondents are responsible for managing, defining, evaluating and recommending the solution based on the Proof-of- Page: 14 ©2007 Object Management Group evaluating and recommending the solution based on the Proof of concept • Enterprise Architecture teams of SOA Consortium members have more influence than the Public – Larger enterprises tend to empower the Enterprise Architecture teams
  • 15. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Involved in Business Process discussions • Enterprise Architecture teams are involved in most Yes TOTOAL teams are involved in most of the Business Process discussions within IT m es N o Public SOA-C (Results in %) 0 20 40 60 Som etimN o Yes TOTOAL Public SOA-C • Enterprise Architecture teams are not as involved in the business process f O 0 10 20 30 40 Som etim es N SOA C discussions of LOB (Results in %) Page: 15 ©2007 Object Management Group S
  • 16. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Skills within EA Data Architecture Low Application Architecture Technology Architecture Medium High Architecture Operations Architecture (R lt i %)Business Architecture Information Architecture (Results in %) 0 50 100 • Enterprise Architecture teams have high competency in Technology Page: 16 ©2007 Object Management Group Enterprise Architecture teams have high competency in Technology. Application and Data Architecture • Enterprise Architecture teams have low competency in Business, Information and Operations Architecture
  • 17. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Comparing EA with SOAp g EA Low M di • The level of maturity of Enterprise Architecture is SOA Medium High c tectu e s better than that of SOA (Results in %) 0 50 • SOA has made better progress than Enterprise Architecture (w r t Defined RA Defining RA EA Architecture (w.r.t. technology) Pilot Project Underway Partial implementation Mature implementation SOA (Results in %) Page: 17 ©2007 Object Management Group 0 50 100
  • 18. Enterprise Architecture of the Future Comparing EA with SOAp g EA Implemented D fi d • Majority of the enterprises are currently defining SOA Defined Defining cu e t y de g the governance – both of EA and SOA • Governance is still a major issue (Results in %) 0 50 100 Business buy in Business to focus on EA/SOA Seat at the table for business discussions LOB-IT Ignoring EA/SOA y EA SOA • The issues facing EA and SOA are identical Governance Funding Technology SOA (Results in %) Page: 18 ©2007 Object Management Group 0 50 100
  • 19. Where SOA Means Business Thank YouThank You Ashok Kumar, Director - Services Architecture, Avis Budget Group Yogish Pai, Sr. Director, Technology, BEA Systems, Inc. Page: 19 ©2007 Object Management Group