Call Girls Service Chennai Jiya 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Chennai
subaxial cervical fx VI.pptx
1. SUBAXIAL CERVICAL FRACTURES:
Clinical Evaluation, Diagnosis and Treatment Methods
Team: Spine
VI/MX
Mod: SV
Supervisor:
dr. Jainal Arifin, M.Kes, Sp.OT(K)Spine
Monday, November 9th 2020
2. CASE
A 71-year-old woman presented after an automotive accident with an
incomplete spinal cord injury (American Spine Injury Association
Impairment Scale [AIS] grade B).
(A, B) A distractive injury is identified at C6–7 in the sagittal CT scan
reconstruction (white arrow).
The Subaxial Injury Classification score was 3 points (distractive injury)
+ 2 points (discoligamentous complex injury) + 3 points (incomplete
neurologic deficits) = 8 points — surgical treatment was performed.
Postoperative sagittal(C) and 3-D reconstruction (D) CT scans showing
reestablishment of cervical alignment and facet joint congruence, with
lateral mass screws at C5 and C6 and pedicle screws at C7 and T1. After
6 months of followup, she had some neurologic improvement (AIS grade
C).
3.
4. INTRODUCTION
Cervical spine trauma is one of the most common sites of spinal cord
injury (SCI). Anatomically, subaxial cervical spine trauma consists of
injuries from C3 to C7 with more than 50% of the cervical spine injuries
located between C5 and C7.
Fracture patterns vary by mechanism and include:
compression fracture
burst fracture
flexion teardrop fracture
extension teardrop avulsion fracture
5. Classification
Descriptive classification (subaxial cervical spine
injuries) includes
compression fracture
burst fraction
flexion-distraction injury
facet dislocation (unilateral or bilateral)
facet fracture
Allen and Ferguson classification
9. Cervical Spine Injury Severity
Score (CSISS)
The cervical spine is conceptualized in terms of four
columns (anterior, posterior, and right and left lateral
columns). Each column is scored from 0 to 5 using an
analog scale based on degree of osseous displacement
and ligamentous injury.
The resulting injury severity score ranges from 0 (no
injury) to 20 (most severe injury). Scores of 7 or more
generally require surgery and scores less than 5 are
generally treated nonoperatively.
16. Treatment
Nonoperative
cervical orthosis or external immobilization (6-12 weeks)
indications
facet fractures without significant subluxation, dislocation, or
kyphosis
17. Operative
immediate closed reduction, then MRI, then surgical stabilization
indications
bilateral facet dislocation with deficits in awake and cooperative patient
unilateral facet dislocation with deficits in awake and cooperative patient
immediate MRI then open reduction surgical stabilization
Indication
facet dislocations (unilateral or bilateral) in patient with mental status changes
patients who fail closed reduction
18. Cervical Lateral Mass Fracture Separation
mechanism of injury
traffic accident, falls, heavy object landing on head
hyperextension, lateral compression and rotation of the cervical spine
19. Clinical presentation
Symptoms
Neurologic symptoms common (up to 66%)
radicular pain, radiculopathy or spinal cord injury/myelopathy
can be classified by Frankel grade or ASIA impairment scale
Physical exam
Inspection
torticollis, paravertebral muscle spasm
Neurovascular
radicular pain and numbness
myelopathy
20. Treatment
Nonoperative
NSAIDS, rest, immobilization
Operative
Posterior decompression and two-level instrumented
fusion
Anterior plating and interbody fusion
Single posterior pedicle screw
Anterior and posterior decompression and fusion
21. Subaxial Cervical Vertebral Body
Fractures
Mechanism:
1. Compression fracture
Characterized by
Compressive failure of anterior vertebral body without disruption of posterior body
cortex and without retropulsion into canal
Cften associated with posterior ligamentous injury
22. 2. Burst fracture
Characterized by
fracture extension through posterior cortex with retropulsion into the spinal canal
often associated with posterior ligamentous injury
Prognosis
often associated with complete and incompete spinal cord injury
Treatment
unstable and usually requires surgery
23. 3. Flexion teardrop fracture
Characterized by
anterior column failure in flexion/compression
posterior portion of vertebra retropulsed posteriorly
posterior column failure in tension
larger anterior lip fragments may be called 'quadrangular fractures’
Prognosis
associated with SCI
Treatment
unstable and usually requires surgery
24. 4. Extension teardrop avulsion fracture
Characterized by
small fleck of bone is avulsed of anterior endplate
usually occur at C2
must differentiate from a true teardrop fracture
Mechanism
extension
Prognosis
stable injury pattern and not associated with SCI
Treatment
cervical collar
25. TREATMENT METHODS
Nonoperative
Collar immobilization for 6 to 12 weeks
Indications
Stable mild compression fractures (intact posterior ligaments
& no significant kyphosis)
Anterior teardrop avulsion fracture
External halo immobilization
Indications
Only if stable fracture pattern (intact posterior ligaments & no
significant kyphosis)
26. TREATMENT METHODS
Operative
Anterior decompression, corpectomy, strut graft, &
fusion with instrumentation
Indications
Compression fracture with 11 degrees of angulation or 25% loss of
vertebral body height
Unstable burst fracture with cord compression
Unstable tear-drop fracture with cord compression
Minimal injury to posterior elements
Posterior decompression, & fusion with instrumentation
Indications
Significant injury to posterior elements
Anterior decompression not required
28. 1. A 40-year-old male sustains subaxial cervical spine fracture and after a
motor vehicle accident. Physical exam is significant for an incomplete
upper cervical spinal cord injury. Which of the following CT scans is
associated with the worst ultimate clinical outcome?
1 Figure A
2 Figure B
3 Figure C
4 Figure D
5 Figure E
30. 1. A 40-year-old male sustains subaxial cervical spine fracture and after a
motor vehicle accident. Physical exam is significant for an incomplete
upper cervical spinal cord injury. Which of the following CT scans is
associated with the worst ultimate clinical outcome?
1 Figure A
2 Figure B
3 Figure C
4 Figure D
5 Figure E
31. Figure B is an axial CT scan demonstrating bilateral facet dislocations, which
is associated with more severe initial neurologic injury and inferior outcomes
compared to patients with cervical spine injuries without facet dislocations.
32. 2. A 40-year-old male patient fell asleep at the wheel and was involved in a
motor vehicle accident. At the emergency room, he presented with an ASIA C
spinal cord injury. An AP radiograph is shown in Figure A. An axial CT scan at
the C5 level is shown in Figure B. Management of this injury should include:
1. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of C5-6
2. Corpectomy of C5 and instrumented fusion C5-6
3. Corpectomy of C5 and instrumented fusion C4-5
4. Posterior instrumented fusion of C4-6
5. Posterior instrumented fusion of C5-6
34. 2. A 40-year-old male patient fell asleep at the wheel and was involved in a
motor vehicle accident. At the emergency room, he presented with an ASIA C
spinal cord injury. An AP radiograph is shown in Figure A. An axial CT scan at
the C5 level is shown in Figure B. Management of this injury should include:
1. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of C5-6
2. Corpectomy of C5 and instrumented fusion C5-6
3. Corpectomy of C5 and instrumented fusion C4-5
4. Posterior instrumented fusion of C4-6
5. Posterior instrumented fusion of C5-6
35. This patient has fracture separation of the lateral mass. This is best treated
with posterior two-level fusion involving both the level above and the level
below.
36. 3. A 24-year-old male sustains the injury shown in Figure A. What was the
most likely mechanism of injury?
1. Hyperextension
2. Flexion-distraction
3. Flexion-compression
4. Rotational
5. Pure axial load
37.
38. 3. A 24-year-old male sustains the injury shown in Figure A. What was the
most likely mechanism of injury?
1. Hyperextension
2. Flexion-distraction
3. Flexion-compression
4. Rotational
5. Pure axial load
39. Figure A shows a quadrangular fracture pattern of C5. These injuries are
observed with flexion-compression loads.