Online casino players know that the latter ones offer various casino bonuses. “Free-load” looks attractive, however, are they really useful these bonuses? Are they profitable for gamblers? The answer to this question depends on a lot of conditions. Mathematics will help us answer this question. Let’s begin with an ordinary casino bonus on deposit: you transfer $100 and obtain $100 more, which it will be possible to get having staked $3000. It is a typical example of casino bonus on the first deposit. The sizes of a deposit and bonus can be different, as well as the required stake rates, but one thing remains unchangeable – the amount of the casino bonus is accessible for withdrawal after the required wager. Till this moment it is impossible to withdraw money, as a rule.

1. Online casino players know that the latter ones offer various casino bonuses. “Free-load” looks attractive, however,
are they really useful these bonuses? Are they profitable for gamblers? The answer to this question depends on a
lot of conditions. Mathematics will help us answer this question.
Let’s begin with an ordinary casino bonus on deposit: you transfer $100 and obtain $100 more, which it will be
possible to get having staked $3000. It is a typical example of casino bonus on the first deposit. The sizes of a
deposit and bonus can be different, as well as the required stake rates, but one thing remains unchangeable – the
amount of the casino bonus is accessible for withdrawal after the required wager. Till this moment it is impossible
to withdraw money, as a rule.
If you are going to play in the online casino for a long time and rather insistently, this casino bonus will help you,
it can really be considered free money. If you play casino slots with 95% pay-outs, a bonus will allow you to make
on average extra 2000$ of stakes ($100/(1-0,95)=$2000), after login pasarqq that the amount of bonus will be
over. But there can be complications, for example, if you simply want to have a look at a casino, without playing
for a long time, if you prefer roulette or other casino games, forbidden by casinos’ rules for winning back bonuses.
In the majority of online casinos you won’t be allowed to withdraw money or will simply return a deposit, if a
wager is not made on the games allowed in the online casino. If you are keen on roulette or blackjack, and a
bonus can be won back only by playing slots, make the required $3000 of stakes, in the course of 95% of pay-outs
you will lose on average $3000*(1-0,95)=$150. As you see, you not only lose the casino bonus but also take out of
your pocket $50, in this case it is better to refuse the bonus. Anyway, if blackjack and poker are allowed for
winning back the bonus with a casino’s profit only about 0,5%, so it can be expected that after winning back the
bonus you will have $100-3000*0,005=$85 of the casino’s money.
The “sticky” or “phantom” bonuses:
More and more popularity in online casinos is gained by “sticky” or “phantom” bonuses – the equivalent of lucky
chips in real casinos. The amount of bonus is impossible to withdraw, it must remain on the account (as if it “has
stuck” to it), until it is completely lost, or annulled on the first withdrawal of cash means (disappears like a
phantom). At first sight it may seem that there is little sense in such a casino bonus – you won’t get money
anyway, but it’s not completely true. If you win, then there is really no point in the bonus, but if you have lost, it
may be of use to you. Without a casino bonus you have lost your $100 and that’s it, bye-bye. But with a bonus,
even if it is a “sticky” one, $100 are still on your casino account, which can help you worm out of the situation. A
possibility to win back the casino bonus in this case is a bit less than 50% (for that you only need to stake the
entire amount on the chances in roulette). In order to maximize profits from “sticky” casino bonuses a casino
player needs to use the strategy “play-an-all-or-nothing game”. Really, if you play little stakes, you will slowly and
surely lose because of the negative math expectancy in casino games, and the bonus will only prolong agony, and
won’t help you win. Clever casino players usually try to realize their casino bonuses quickly – somebody stakes the
entire amount on chances, in the hope to double it (just imagine, you stake all $200 on chances, with a probability
of 49% you’ll win neat $200, with a probability of 51% you’ll lose your $100 and $100 of the bonus, that is to say, a
stake has positive math expectancy for you $200*0,49-$100*0,51=$47), some casino players use progressive
strategies of Martingale type. It is recommended to fix the desired amount of your gain, for example $200, and try
to win it, taking risks. If you have contributed a deposit in the amount of $100, obtained “sticky” $150 and plan to
enlarge the sum on your casino account up to $500 (that is to win $250), then a probability to achieve your aim is
(100 150)/500=50%, at this the desired real value of the casino bonus for you is (100 150)/500*(500-150)-100=$75
(you can substitute it for your own figures, but, please, take into account that the formulas are given for games
with zero math expectancy, in real casino games the results will be lower).
The cash back bonus:
There is a seldom encountered variant of a bonus, namely return of loosing. There can be singled out two variants
– the complete return of the lost deposit, at this the returned money usually is to be won back like with an

2. ordinary bonus, or a partial return (10-25%) of the loosing over the fixed period (a week, a month). In the first case
the situation is practically identical to the case with a “sticky” bonus – if we win, there is no point in the bonus, but
it helps in case of losing. Math calculations will be also analogous to the “sticky” bonus and the strategy of the
game is similar – we risk, try to win as much as possible. If we are not lucky and we have lost, we can play with the
help of the returned money, already minimizing the risk. Partial return of the losing for an active gambler can be
regarded as an insignificant advantage of casinos in games. If you play blackjack with math expectancy – 0,5%,
then, having made stakes on $10 000, you will lose on average $50. With 20% of return $10 will be given back to
you, that is you losing will amount to $40, which is equivalent to the increase in math expectancy up to 0,4% (ME
with return=theoretical ME of the game * (1-% of return). However, from the given bonus can also be derived
benefit, for that you need to play less. We make only one but a high stake, for example $100, on the same stakes
in roulette. In 49% of cases again we win $100, and 51% – we lose $100, but at the end of the month we get back
our 20% that is $20. As a result the effect is $100*0,49-($100-$20)*0,51=$8,2. As you see, the stake then has
positive math expectancy, but dispersion is big for we’ll be able to play this way rather seldom – once a week or
even once a month.
I will allow myself a short remark, slightly digressing from the main subject. On a casino forum one of the
gamblers started to claim that tournaments were not fair, arguing it in the following way: “No normal person will
ever make a single stake within the last 10 minutes of the tournament, which 3,5-fold surpasses the prize amount
($100), in nomination of a maximal losing, so as to win. What is the point?”
And really does it make sense? The situation is very similar to the variant with return of losing. If a stake has won –
we are already in the black. If it has lost – we’ll get a tournament prize of $100. So, the math expectancy of the
above-mentioned stake amounting to $350 is: $350*0,49-($350-$100)*0,51=$44. Yes, we may lose $250 today, but
shall win $350 tomorrow, and over a year playing every day, we’ll accumulate pretty 365*$44=$16 000. Having
solved a simple equation, we’ll find out that stakes up to $1900 are profitable for us! Of course, for such a casino
game we need to have thousands of dollars on our account, but we certainly can’t blame casinos for dishonesty or
gamblers for being foolish.
Let’s come back to our casino bonuses, to the most “free-load” ones- without any deposit. Of late one has been
able to notice more and more casino advertisements promising up to $500 absolutely free of charge, without any
deposit. The pattern is the following – you really get $500 on a special account and limited time for play (usually
an hour). After an hour you get only the amount of your gain, but still not more than $500. The gain is transferred
on a real casino account where you must win it back, like any casino bonus, usually having run it 20 times in casino
slots. $500 free – it sounds attractive, but what is the real price of the bonus? Well, the first part – you need to win
$500. Using a simplified formula, we can see that probability of winning is 50% (in practice, it is certainly even
smaller). The second part – we win the casino bonus back, you need to stake $10 000 in casino slots. We don’t
know the rates of pay-outs in casino slots, they are not published by online casinos and make up on average
about 95% (for various kinds they fluctuate about 90-98%). If we get at an average slot, then till the end of the
wager we’ll have $500-10 000*0,05=$0 on our casino account, not a bad game… If we are lucky to choose a casino
slot with high pay-outs, we can await $500-10 000*0,02=$300. Even though the probability to choose a slot with
high pay-outs is 50% (you have listened to the opinions of other gamblers since by random choice this probability
will make up hardly more than 10-20%, for there are few generous casino slots), in this case the value of a
generous deposit free casino bonus amounts to $300*0,5*0,5=$75. Much less than $500, but still not too bad,
though we can see that even with the most optimal suppositions the final amount of the casino bonus has
decreased seven-fold.
I hope, this excursion into mathematics domain of online casino bonuses will be of use to gamblers – if you want
to win, you simply need to think a little and make calculations.