SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Demystifying Optical Ethernet Networks
Monday, February 01 2010

The TDM-to-packet network transformation has been underway in transport/ telecommunications networks
for some years now, fueled primarily by two trends: (a) the advent of triple-play (voice, video, data) for
enterprise and residential customers and, lately, the explosion in video and mobile data services, and (b) the
evolution in both packet- and transport-network equipment.




       Figure 1. Three key components of Optical Ethernet: service, transport, PHY, together with the
         technologiesand standards organizations involved in specifying/developing each component.
In this regard, there have been rapid advancements to make packet technologies, such as IP and Ethernet,
more “circuit-like”, and to make transport technologies and equipment more dynamic and, thus, “packet
friendly.” These developments have led, over the last few years, to the emergence of a mélange of terms —
“optical Ethernet”, “metro optical Ethernet”, “packet-optical transport”, “Carrier Ethernet”, “metro
Ethernet” — which are often used interchangeably, blurring the distinction between them, and leading to
confusion in industry circles. Our objective here is to define the terms optical Ethernet, Carrier Ethernet,
and packet-optical transport, explain their relationships, and show how they all fit together in emerging
optical Ethernet networks.
Versatile Packet Networking
Before defining the term “optical Ethernet,” it is useful to point out that the term “Ethernet” itself can apply
to any one of the three roles of Ethernet technology: as a service, as a transport technology, and as a PHY
layer (Figure 1).




   Figure 2. Relationships of the different layers: service layer, transport layer, and PHY layer, and their
                                            corresponding entities.
An Ethernet service is offered to the end-customer (the enterprise or residential customer), runs end-to-end
(customer premise-to-customer premise), and is one in which the traffic flow into/out of the system at the
customer consists of Ethernet frames. An Ethernet service is thus the Ethernet connectivity between
customer equipment. A carrier-grade Ethernet service is one that is scalable (to many MAC addresses and
end points), offers QoS (traffic management), reliability (protection), and manageability (OAM and
monitoring), and can span long distances (of MAN/WAN scope; typically tens to thousands of kilometers).

Ethernet transport refers to the ability to switch/route Ethernet frames (belonging to an Ethernet service)
between network nodes, by setting up/using connection-oriented, traffic engineered paths in the network
with deterministic performance (QoS, delay, jitter, loss, reliability). In other words, Ethernet transport
refers to the setting up of the “pipe” through which the Ethernet frames travel, and to determining its
routing within the cloud.

Ethernet transport makes it possible to realize connection-oriented Ethernet (COE). COE, in essence, refers
to the collection of control-plane protocols and data-plane settings that create a connection- oriented
capability for transferring the frames of an Ethernet service. We mention that Ethernet transport could be
provided either by enhancing Ethernet technology (e.g. as is done in Provider Backbone Bridging with
Traffic Engineering, PBB-TE, in the IEEE 802.1Qay standard) or by a different technology (e.g. using
MPLS-TP technology being developed jointly by the IETF & the ITU-T). Both of these forms of transport
involve switching/routing data frames and are, therefore, referred to as Layer 2 (or L2) transport.

It is also possible to embed Ethernet frames in a different transport networking layer, such as the one
provided by the ITU-T’s G.709 OTN (Optical Transport Network) standard. This form of transport
involves switching/routing traffic at the optical channel data unit (ODU) level and is, therefore, referred to
as Layer 1 (or L1) transport.

Ethernet PHY refers to the framing and timing of the actual bits of the Ethernet frame, and their
transmission over a physical medium — copper wire, coaxial cable, or optical fiber — to connect switches
at the physical layer. Some common Ethernet PHYs are the 1 GE (IEEE 802.3z), 10 GE (IEEE 802.1ae),
and 100 GE (IEEE 802.3ba) Ethernet PHYs. Note that Ethernet frames can also be embedded in other PHY
framing standards, such as those in the ITU-T’s G.709 OTN (Optical Transport Network) standard.
Optical Ethernet Network
With this background, we may now define an Optical Ethernet Network as a network spanning a
MAN/WAN that offers a carrier-grade Ethernet service, running over a connection-oriented Ethernet
(COE) transport infrastructure over an optical PHY (Figure 2). The optical PHY could be provided either
by the OTN’s optical channel (OCh), or by an Ethernet PHY running over optics, and may be multiplexed
onto a given fiber using CWDM/DWDM technology.

A key characteristic of optical Ethernet is that its scope is beyond the enterprise LAN, and spans a
metropolitan- area or wide-area network.

“Carrier Ethernet” vs Optical Ethernet
The term “Carrier Ethernet” was formalized by the work of the MEF (Metro Ethernet Forum) in the 2004-
2005 time frame, which defines Carrier Ethernet as “a ubiquitous carrier-grade Ethernet service that has the
following five attributes: standardized services, scalability, reliability/ protection, hard QoS, and service
management.” The technical work of the MEF (as described in its specifications) together with the
technical work of associated standards bodies (ITU-T, IEEE, IETF) enable the functionality and attributes
of Carrier Ethernet.

The services defined by the MEF are in terms of an Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC), which is defined
as an association of two or more User Network Interfaces (UNIs) at the edge of a metro Ethernet network
(MEN) cloud (i.e. subscriber sites), where the exchange of Ethernet service frames is limited to the UNI’s
in the EVC. The MEF defines three standardized services: E-Line (a point-topoint EVC), E-LAN (a
multipoint-to-multipoint EVC), and E-Tree (a point-to-multipoint “rooted” EVC, where the root(s) can
communicate with any of the leaves, but the leaves must communicate with each other only via the root).




     Figure 3. Optical Ethernet Network with the service, transport and PHYcomponents in operation.
Scalability refers to a service that scales to millions of UNIs (end-points) and MAC addresses, spanning
access, local, national, and global networks, with the ability to support a wide bandwidth granularity and
versatile QoS options. Reliability refers to the ability to detect and recover from errors/faults without
impacting customers, typically with rapid recovery times, as low as 50ms. Hard QoS implies providing
end-to-end performance based on rates, frame loss, delay, and delay variation, and the ability to deliver
SLAs that guarantee performance that matches the requirements of voice, video, and data traffic over
heterogeneous converged networks. Service management implies having carrier-class OAM, and standards-
based, vendor-independent implementations to monitor, diagnose, and manage networks offering Carrier
Ethernet service.

Thus, we see that Carrier Ethernet comprises the service component of optical Ethernet networks (Figure 1,
Figure 2, and Figure 5).

Packet-Optical Transport
Packet-optical transport systems (P-OTS or P-OTP) are a new class of networking platforms that combine
the functions and features of SONET/SDH/OTN ADMs or cross-connects, Ethernet switching and
aggregation systems, and WDM/ROADM transport systems into a single network element, thus providing
“data-aware optical networking.”

A P-OTS network element typically will have ITU-T G.709 OTN support, a COE component, and support
for WDM. These elements also offer transport of a wide range of client signals — Ethernet (dominant),
legacy SONET/ SDH, SAN traffic, IP/ATM, video traffic, and can switch at the wavelength level Figure 3.
Optical Ethernet Network with the service, transport and PHYcomponents in operation. (WDM), sub-
wavelength (or ODU) level, TDM level (SONET/SDH), and packet level (Ethernet, MPLS). A P-OTS
network element enables a carrier, especially in the MAN/WAN, to quickly and cost-effectively change
connectivity and bandwidth in the network, without knowing about the actual services.




Key architectural features of P-OTS elements are:

    •    Universal switching architecture/fabric for switching traffic at different layers (OTN, TDM and
         packet)

    •    Ability to switch, groom, and manage traffic in its native format (i.e. SONET/SDH traffic as TDM
         traffic, and IP or Ethernet traffic as packet traffic), thus, allowing for the percentage of each traffic
         type to vary dynamically (all Ethernet to all SONET/SDH and anything in between, for instance)

    •    Software-selectable ports that can switch between switching SONET/ SDH to switching Ethernet,
         depending on the traffic

Even as this definition is gaining industry consensus, according to research firm Heavy Reading, there are
three architectures that are currently deemed to fall under the packet optical transport umbrella, shown in
Figure 4.

Thus, P-OTS platforms provide the transport and PHY components of optical Ethernet networks (Figure 5).
Optical Ethernet Applications
So which applications/services are optical Ethernet being used for (or envisaged for) today?




               Figure 4. Packet-Optical Transport Systems (P-OTS): Architectures in use today.
As expected, it is the business or residential services with triple-play applications (voice, video, and data to
the desktop), mobile backhaul applications (where the Ethernet PHY is used between the base-station and
the first switching node, and regular optical Ethernet networks are used in the backhaul and backbone
networks), and utility infrastructure networks (where oil, gas, water, and electric utilities are transforming
their aged communication systems into “data-aware” systems that allow for automation of functions such
as billing, monitoring, meter reading).

Applications such as software-as-a-service, VoIP, VoD, and hosted unified communications are driving
demand, as are ICT trends such as virtualization, data center outsourcing, data replication, disaster
recovery, remote backup, and IT outsourcing.
How It All Fits Together




                                   Figure 5. Optical Ethernet: How it all fits.
Thus, we see that in the trio that are the components of optical Ethernet — service, transport and PHY —
Carrier Ethernet provides the service component, packet-optical transport gear provides the transport and
PHY component, and the various IETF, IEEE, and ITU-T standards provide the specifications for the PHY
layers, as well as connection-oriented Ethernet (Figure 5).

As optical Ethernet evolves over the next few years, there will be further reduction in the layers leading to a
fused Ethernet-WDM packet transport layer with circuit-like capabilities, and to packet- optical systems
optimized for it. This allows the providers to handle increasing volume of data traffic, while reducing the
number of network elements by using Ethernet as the common packet technology in access, aggregation,
and core networks.

This article was written by Vishal Sharma, Ph.D., Principal Consultant & Technologist, Metanoia, Inc.
(Mountain View, CA) and Shahram Davari, MASc, Associate Technical Director, Network Switching,
Broadcom Corporation (San Jose, CA). For more information, contact Dr. Sharma at vsharma@metanoia-
inc.com, Mr. Davari at davari@broadcom.com, or visit http://info.hotims.com/28050-201.

	
  

More Related Content

What's hot

Discover Optical Ethernet V5
Discover Optical Ethernet V5Discover Optical Ethernet V5
Discover Optical Ethernet V5
ss
 
Seminar report of optical ethernet
Seminar report of optical ethernetSeminar report of optical ethernet
Seminar report of optical ethernet
Mohammad Waziruddin
 
2020296 ethernet over sonet 2
2020296 ethernet over sonet 22020296 ethernet over sonet 2
2020296 ethernet over sonet 2
Le Dac Hoang
 
LTE: Introduction, evolution and testing
LTE: Introduction, evolution and testingLTE: Introduction, evolution and testing
LTE: Introduction, evolution and testing
Rohde & Schwarz North America
 
Woban Prototype Ieee Network
Woban Prototype Ieee NetworkWoban Prototype Ieee Network
Woban Prototype Ieee Network
Shahab Shahid
 
Voice and sms in LTE
Voice and sms in LTEVoice and sms in LTE
Voice and sms in LTE
Morg
 

What's hot (20)

Carrier Ethernet - What and Why
Carrier Ethernet - What and Why  Carrier Ethernet - What and Why
Carrier Ethernet - What and Why
 
Ethernet Demarcation Devices for managing end to end Ethernet service delivery
Ethernet Demarcation Devices for managing end to end Ethernet service deliveryEthernet Demarcation Devices for managing end to end Ethernet service delivery
Ethernet Demarcation Devices for managing end to end Ethernet service delivery
 
Lte
LteLte
Lte
 
J0343073079
J0343073079J0343073079
J0343073079
 
The performance of the vehicular communication-clustering process
The performance of the vehicular communication-clustering processThe performance of the vehicular communication-clustering process
The performance of the vehicular communication-clustering process
 
Discover Optical Ethernet V5
Discover Optical Ethernet V5Discover Optical Ethernet V5
Discover Optical Ethernet V5
 
Seminar report of optical ethernet
Seminar report of optical ethernetSeminar report of optical ethernet
Seminar report of optical ethernet
 
Performance Analysis of MIMO-LTE for MQAM over Fading Channels
Performance Analysis of MIMO-LTE for MQAM over Fading ChannelsPerformance Analysis of MIMO-LTE for MQAM over Fading Channels
Performance Analysis of MIMO-LTE for MQAM over Fading Channels
 
“EPoC”: The Art of Mixed Media
“EPoC”: The Art of Mixed Media“EPoC”: The Art of Mixed Media
“EPoC”: The Art of Mixed Media
 
Introduction to optic fibre
Introduction to optic fibreIntroduction to optic fibre
Introduction to optic fibre
 
2020296 ethernet over sonet 2
2020296 ethernet over sonet 22020296 ethernet over sonet 2
2020296 ethernet over sonet 2
 
Improvement of QoS Contained by AODV Routing Protocol On the Basis of Varying...
Improvement of QoS Contained by AODV Routing Protocol On the Basis of Varying...Improvement of QoS Contained by AODV Routing Protocol On the Basis of Varying...
Improvement of QoS Contained by AODV Routing Protocol On the Basis of Varying...
 
Resilience and Service Protection in EPON
Resilience and Service Protection in EPONResilience and Service Protection in EPON
Resilience and Service Protection in EPON
 
Lte training an introduction-to-lte-basics
Lte training an introduction-to-lte-basicsLte training an introduction-to-lte-basics
Lte training an introduction-to-lte-basics
 
LTE: Introduction, evolution and testing
LTE: Introduction, evolution and testingLTE: Introduction, evolution and testing
LTE: Introduction, evolution and testing
 
1880153 1880165
1880153 18801651880153 1880165
1880153 1880165
 
Power Utilities Migration Solutions
Power Utilities Migration SolutionsPower Utilities Migration Solutions
Power Utilities Migration Solutions
 
Woban Prototype Ieee Network
Woban Prototype Ieee NetworkWoban Prototype Ieee Network
Woban Prototype Ieee Network
 
Voice and sms in LTE
Voice and sms in LTEVoice and sms in LTE
Voice and sms in LTE
 
EPON Technology and its Application in China Telecomʹs Access Network Migration
EPON Technology and its Application in China Telecomʹs Access Network MigrationEPON Technology and its Application in China Telecomʹs Access Network Migration
EPON Technology and its Application in China Telecomʹs Access Network Migration
 

Similar to Demystifying optical ethernet networks

Rach congestion in vehicular
Rach congestion in vehicularRach congestion in vehicular
Rach congestion in vehicular
ijwmn
 
Carrier ethernetessentials
Carrier ethernetessentialsCarrier ethernetessentials
Carrier ethernetessentials
c09271
 
16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf
16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf
16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf
andutokicho
 
OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852
OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852
OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852
Yi-Neng Lin
 

Similar to Demystifying optical ethernet networks (20)

C011111523
C011111523C011111523
C011111523
 
Throughput Performance Analysis VOIP over LTE
Throughput Performance Analysis VOIP over LTEThroughput Performance Analysis VOIP over LTE
Throughput Performance Analysis VOIP over LTE
 
D011112432
D011112432D011112432
D011112432
 
Video steaming Throughput Performance Analysis over LTE
Video steaming Throughput Performance Analysis over LTEVideo steaming Throughput Performance Analysis over LTE
Video steaming Throughput Performance Analysis over LTE
 
Frame
FrameFrame
Frame
 
Optical ethernet krunal
Optical ethernet krunalOptical ethernet krunal
Optical ethernet krunal
 
Networks and internet
Networks and internetNetworks and internet
Networks and internet
 
Rach congestion in vehicular
Rach congestion in vehicularRach congestion in vehicular
Rach congestion in vehicular
 
Carrier ethernetessentials
Carrier ethernetessentialsCarrier ethernetessentials
Carrier ethernetessentials
 
comparsion of LTE and wimax
comparsion of LTE and wimaxcomparsion of LTE and wimax
comparsion of LTE and wimax
 
Vo ip on 3gpp lte network a survey
Vo ip on 3gpp lte network a surveyVo ip on 3gpp lte network a survey
Vo ip on 3gpp lte network a survey
 
exfo_reference-guide_otn.pdf
exfo_reference-guide_otn.pdfexfo_reference-guide_otn.pdf
exfo_reference-guide_otn.pdf
 
Practical aspects of lte design and deployment
Practical aspects of lte design and deploymentPractical aspects of lte design and deployment
Practical aspects of lte design and deployment
 
LTE
LTELTE
LTE
 
Carrier Ethernet
Carrier EthernetCarrier Ethernet
Carrier Ethernet
 
16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf
16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf
16731_altran_otn_wp_01_q3fy18_new.pdf
 
2002023
20020232002023
2002023
 
1_introduction.ppt
1_introduction.ppt1_introduction.ppt
1_introduction.ppt
 
OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852
OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852
OptiQNet-842-DM-v0.4-for-852
 
How otn supercedes over sdh?
How otn supercedes over sdh?How otn supercedes over sdh?
How otn supercedes over sdh?
 

More from Vishal Sharma, Ph.D.

7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.
7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.
7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.
Vishal Sharma, Ph.D.
 
A Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) Tools
A Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) ToolsA Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) Tools
A Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) Tools
Vishal Sharma, Ph.D.
 
Carrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoS
Carrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoSCarrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoS
Carrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoS
Vishal Sharma, Ph.D.
 
Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?
Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?
Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?
Vishal Sharma, Ph.D.
 

More from Vishal Sharma, Ph.D. (20)

Intellectual Property Challenges and IoT
Intellectual Property Challenges and IoTIntellectual Property Challenges and IoT
Intellectual Property Challenges and IoT
 
Network Infrastructure Security in Cellular Data Networks: An Initial Invest...
Network Infrastructure Security in  Cellular Data Networks: An Initial Invest...Network Infrastructure Security in  Cellular Data Networks: An Initial Invest...
Network Infrastructure Security in Cellular Data Networks: An Initial Invest...
 
7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.
7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.
7 Keys to Accelerate Profits by Partnering with Metanoia, Inc.
 
A New Analysis for Wavelength Translation in Regular WDM Networks
A New Analysis for Wavelength Translation in Regular WDM NetworksA New Analysis for Wavelength Translation in Regular WDM Networks
A New Analysis for Wavelength Translation in Regular WDM Networks
 
Architectural Options for Metro Carrier-Ethernet Network Buildout: Analysis &...
Architectural Options for Metro Carrier-Ethernet Network Buildout: Analysis &...Architectural Options for Metro Carrier-Ethernet Network Buildout: Analysis &...
Architectural Options for Metro Carrier-Ethernet Network Buildout: Analysis &...
 
Nanog panel carrier-network-health_vishal_8-5-12
Nanog panel carrier-network-health_vishal_8-5-12Nanog panel carrier-network-health_vishal_8-5-12
Nanog panel carrier-network-health_vishal_8-5-12
 
Capacity Planning Panel - Operator and Eco-System Player Discourse
Capacity Planning Panel - Operator and Eco-System Player DiscourseCapacity Planning Panel - Operator and Eco-System Player Discourse
Capacity Planning Panel - Operator and Eco-System Player Discourse
 
Internet Routing Protocols: Fundamental Concepts of Distance-Vector and Link-...
Internet Routing Protocols: Fundamental Concepts of Distance-Vector and Link-...Internet Routing Protocols: Fundamental Concepts of Distance-Vector and Link-...
Internet Routing Protocols: Fundamental Concepts of Distance-Vector and Link-...
 
Modern Carrier Strategies for Traffic Engineering
Modern Carrier Strategies for Traffic EngineeringModern Carrier Strategies for Traffic Engineering
Modern Carrier Strategies for Traffic Engineering
 
Approaches to Designing a High-Performance Switch Router
Approaches to Designing a High-Performance Switch RouterApproaches to Designing a High-Performance Switch Router
Approaches to Designing a High-Performance Switch Router
 
Multi-Protocol Lambda Switching: The Role of IP Technologies in Controlling a...
Multi-Protocol Lambda Switching: The Role of IP Technologies in Controlling a...Multi-Protocol Lambda Switching: The Role of IP Technologies in Controlling a...
Multi-Protocol Lambda Switching: The Role of IP Technologies in Controlling a...
 
Elements of Cross-Layer System & Network Design for QoS-Enabled Wi-Max Networks
Elements of Cross-Layer System & Network Design for QoS-Enabled Wi-Max Networks Elements of Cross-Layer System & Network Design for QoS-Enabled Wi-Max Networks
Elements of Cross-Layer System & Network Design for QoS-Enabled Wi-Max Networks
 
Metro ethernet metanoiainc-next-gen-workshop_2007-07-17
Metro ethernet metanoiainc-next-gen-workshop_2007-07-17Metro ethernet metanoiainc-next-gen-workshop_2007-07-17
Metro ethernet metanoiainc-next-gen-workshop_2007-07-17
 
Packet-Optical Integration: The Key to Evolving Towards Packet Enabled Agile ...
Packet-Optical Integration: The Key to Evolving Towards Packet Enabled Agile ...Packet-Optical Integration: The Key to Evolving Towards Packet Enabled Agile ...
Packet-Optical Integration: The Key to Evolving Towards Packet Enabled Agile ...
 
A Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) Tools
A Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) ToolsA Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) Tools
A Survey of Recent Advances in Network Planning/Traffic Engineering (TE) Tools
 
Carrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoS
Carrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoSCarrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoS
Carrier Strategies for Backbone Traffic Engineering and QoS
 
Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?
Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?
Network Planning & Design: An Art or a Science?
 
Multi-Protocol Label Switching: Basics and Applications
Multi-Protocol Label Switching: Basics and ApplicationsMulti-Protocol Label Switching: Basics and Applications
Multi-Protocol Label Switching: Basics and Applications
 
Vendor Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc 2010 12 06 Rs
Vendor Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc 2010 12 06 RsVendor Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc 2010 12 06 Rs
Vendor Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc 2010 12 06 Rs
 
Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc Dec 2010
Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc Dec 2010Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc Dec 2010
Operator Focus Areas And Metanoia Inc Dec 2010
 

Recently uploaded

Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Victor Rentea
 

Recently uploaded (20)

[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
[BuildWithAI] Introduction to Gemini.pdf
 
Cyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdf
Cyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdfCyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdf
Cyberprint. Dark Pink Apt Group [EN].pdf
 
Spring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUK
Spring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUKSpring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUK
Spring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUK
 
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In PakistanCNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
CNIC Information System with Pakdata Cf In Pakistan
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
 
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
Modular Monolith - a Practical Alternative to Microservices @ Devoxx UK 2024
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
 
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdfRansomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 

Demystifying optical ethernet networks

  • 1. Demystifying Optical Ethernet Networks Monday, February 01 2010 The TDM-to-packet network transformation has been underway in transport/ telecommunications networks for some years now, fueled primarily by two trends: (a) the advent of triple-play (voice, video, data) for enterprise and residential customers and, lately, the explosion in video and mobile data services, and (b) the evolution in both packet- and transport-network equipment. Figure 1. Three key components of Optical Ethernet: service, transport, PHY, together with the technologiesand standards organizations involved in specifying/developing each component. In this regard, there have been rapid advancements to make packet technologies, such as IP and Ethernet, more “circuit-like”, and to make transport technologies and equipment more dynamic and, thus, “packet friendly.” These developments have led, over the last few years, to the emergence of a mélange of terms — “optical Ethernet”, “metro optical Ethernet”, “packet-optical transport”, “Carrier Ethernet”, “metro Ethernet” — which are often used interchangeably, blurring the distinction between them, and leading to confusion in industry circles. Our objective here is to define the terms optical Ethernet, Carrier Ethernet, and packet-optical transport, explain their relationships, and show how they all fit together in emerging optical Ethernet networks.
  • 2. Versatile Packet Networking Before defining the term “optical Ethernet,” it is useful to point out that the term “Ethernet” itself can apply to any one of the three roles of Ethernet technology: as a service, as a transport technology, and as a PHY layer (Figure 1). Figure 2. Relationships of the different layers: service layer, transport layer, and PHY layer, and their corresponding entities. An Ethernet service is offered to the end-customer (the enterprise or residential customer), runs end-to-end (customer premise-to-customer premise), and is one in which the traffic flow into/out of the system at the customer consists of Ethernet frames. An Ethernet service is thus the Ethernet connectivity between customer equipment. A carrier-grade Ethernet service is one that is scalable (to many MAC addresses and end points), offers QoS (traffic management), reliability (protection), and manageability (OAM and monitoring), and can span long distances (of MAN/WAN scope; typically tens to thousands of kilometers). Ethernet transport refers to the ability to switch/route Ethernet frames (belonging to an Ethernet service) between network nodes, by setting up/using connection-oriented, traffic engineered paths in the network with deterministic performance (QoS, delay, jitter, loss, reliability). In other words, Ethernet transport refers to the setting up of the “pipe” through which the Ethernet frames travel, and to determining its routing within the cloud. Ethernet transport makes it possible to realize connection-oriented Ethernet (COE). COE, in essence, refers to the collection of control-plane protocols and data-plane settings that create a connection- oriented capability for transferring the frames of an Ethernet service. We mention that Ethernet transport could be provided either by enhancing Ethernet technology (e.g. as is done in Provider Backbone Bridging with Traffic Engineering, PBB-TE, in the IEEE 802.1Qay standard) or by a different technology (e.g. using MPLS-TP technology being developed jointly by the IETF & the ITU-T). Both of these forms of transport involve switching/routing data frames and are, therefore, referred to as Layer 2 (or L2) transport. It is also possible to embed Ethernet frames in a different transport networking layer, such as the one provided by the ITU-T’s G.709 OTN (Optical Transport Network) standard. This form of transport involves switching/routing traffic at the optical channel data unit (ODU) level and is, therefore, referred to as Layer 1 (or L1) transport. Ethernet PHY refers to the framing and timing of the actual bits of the Ethernet frame, and their transmission over a physical medium — copper wire, coaxial cable, or optical fiber — to connect switches at the physical layer. Some common Ethernet PHYs are the 1 GE (IEEE 802.3z), 10 GE (IEEE 802.1ae), and 100 GE (IEEE 802.3ba) Ethernet PHYs. Note that Ethernet frames can also be embedded in other PHY framing standards, such as those in the ITU-T’s G.709 OTN (Optical Transport Network) standard.
  • 3. Optical Ethernet Network With this background, we may now define an Optical Ethernet Network as a network spanning a MAN/WAN that offers a carrier-grade Ethernet service, running over a connection-oriented Ethernet (COE) transport infrastructure over an optical PHY (Figure 2). The optical PHY could be provided either by the OTN’s optical channel (OCh), or by an Ethernet PHY running over optics, and may be multiplexed onto a given fiber using CWDM/DWDM technology. A key characteristic of optical Ethernet is that its scope is beyond the enterprise LAN, and spans a metropolitan- area or wide-area network. “Carrier Ethernet” vs Optical Ethernet The term “Carrier Ethernet” was formalized by the work of the MEF (Metro Ethernet Forum) in the 2004- 2005 time frame, which defines Carrier Ethernet as “a ubiquitous carrier-grade Ethernet service that has the following five attributes: standardized services, scalability, reliability/ protection, hard QoS, and service management.” The technical work of the MEF (as described in its specifications) together with the technical work of associated standards bodies (ITU-T, IEEE, IETF) enable the functionality and attributes of Carrier Ethernet. The services defined by the MEF are in terms of an Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC), which is defined as an association of two or more User Network Interfaces (UNIs) at the edge of a metro Ethernet network (MEN) cloud (i.e. subscriber sites), where the exchange of Ethernet service frames is limited to the UNI’s in the EVC. The MEF defines three standardized services: E-Line (a point-topoint EVC), E-LAN (a multipoint-to-multipoint EVC), and E-Tree (a point-to-multipoint “rooted” EVC, where the root(s) can communicate with any of the leaves, but the leaves must communicate with each other only via the root). Figure 3. Optical Ethernet Network with the service, transport and PHYcomponents in operation. Scalability refers to a service that scales to millions of UNIs (end-points) and MAC addresses, spanning access, local, national, and global networks, with the ability to support a wide bandwidth granularity and
  • 4. versatile QoS options. Reliability refers to the ability to detect and recover from errors/faults without impacting customers, typically with rapid recovery times, as low as 50ms. Hard QoS implies providing end-to-end performance based on rates, frame loss, delay, and delay variation, and the ability to deliver SLAs that guarantee performance that matches the requirements of voice, video, and data traffic over heterogeneous converged networks. Service management implies having carrier-class OAM, and standards- based, vendor-independent implementations to monitor, diagnose, and manage networks offering Carrier Ethernet service. Thus, we see that Carrier Ethernet comprises the service component of optical Ethernet networks (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 5). Packet-Optical Transport Packet-optical transport systems (P-OTS or P-OTP) are a new class of networking platforms that combine the functions and features of SONET/SDH/OTN ADMs or cross-connects, Ethernet switching and aggregation systems, and WDM/ROADM transport systems into a single network element, thus providing “data-aware optical networking.” A P-OTS network element typically will have ITU-T G.709 OTN support, a COE component, and support for WDM. These elements also offer transport of a wide range of client signals — Ethernet (dominant), legacy SONET/ SDH, SAN traffic, IP/ATM, video traffic, and can switch at the wavelength level Figure 3. Optical Ethernet Network with the service, transport and PHYcomponents in operation. (WDM), sub- wavelength (or ODU) level, TDM level (SONET/SDH), and packet level (Ethernet, MPLS). A P-OTS network element enables a carrier, especially in the MAN/WAN, to quickly and cost-effectively change connectivity and bandwidth in the network, without knowing about the actual services. Key architectural features of P-OTS elements are: • Universal switching architecture/fabric for switching traffic at different layers (OTN, TDM and packet) • Ability to switch, groom, and manage traffic in its native format (i.e. SONET/SDH traffic as TDM traffic, and IP or Ethernet traffic as packet traffic), thus, allowing for the percentage of each traffic type to vary dynamically (all Ethernet to all SONET/SDH and anything in between, for instance) • Software-selectable ports that can switch between switching SONET/ SDH to switching Ethernet, depending on the traffic Even as this definition is gaining industry consensus, according to research firm Heavy Reading, there are three architectures that are currently deemed to fall under the packet optical transport umbrella, shown in Figure 4. Thus, P-OTS platforms provide the transport and PHY components of optical Ethernet networks (Figure 5).
  • 5. Optical Ethernet Applications So which applications/services are optical Ethernet being used for (or envisaged for) today? Figure 4. Packet-Optical Transport Systems (P-OTS): Architectures in use today. As expected, it is the business or residential services with triple-play applications (voice, video, and data to the desktop), mobile backhaul applications (where the Ethernet PHY is used between the base-station and the first switching node, and regular optical Ethernet networks are used in the backhaul and backbone networks), and utility infrastructure networks (where oil, gas, water, and electric utilities are transforming their aged communication systems into “data-aware” systems that allow for automation of functions such as billing, monitoring, meter reading). Applications such as software-as-a-service, VoIP, VoD, and hosted unified communications are driving demand, as are ICT trends such as virtualization, data center outsourcing, data replication, disaster recovery, remote backup, and IT outsourcing.
  • 6. How It All Fits Together Figure 5. Optical Ethernet: How it all fits. Thus, we see that in the trio that are the components of optical Ethernet — service, transport and PHY — Carrier Ethernet provides the service component, packet-optical transport gear provides the transport and PHY component, and the various IETF, IEEE, and ITU-T standards provide the specifications for the PHY layers, as well as connection-oriented Ethernet (Figure 5). As optical Ethernet evolves over the next few years, there will be further reduction in the layers leading to a fused Ethernet-WDM packet transport layer with circuit-like capabilities, and to packet- optical systems optimized for it. This allows the providers to handle increasing volume of data traffic, while reducing the number of network elements by using Ethernet as the common packet technology in access, aggregation, and core networks. This article was written by Vishal Sharma, Ph.D., Principal Consultant & Technologist, Metanoia, Inc. (Mountain View, CA) and Shahram Davari, MASc, Associate Technical Director, Network Switching, Broadcom Corporation (San Jose, CA). For more information, contact Dr. Sharma at vsharma@metanoia- inc.com, Mr. Davari at davari@broadcom.com, or visit http://info.hotims.com/28050-201.