BPPG response - Options for Defined Benefit schemes - 19Apr24.pdf
Pakistan's Economic Planning History and Challenges
1. ECONOMIC PLANNING IN PAKISTAN
Dr Vaqar Ahmed
Sustainable Development
Policy Institute (SDPI)
December 29, 2020
2. OUTLINE
Planning Frameworks & History of Planning in Pakistan
Planning Agencies in Pakistan
Critical Appraisal of Institutional Strengths & Weaknesses of Planning Structure
Various Phases of Planning Process
International Best Practices
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 2
3. IS ‘PLANNING’ FUNCTION STILL NEEDED?
Yes, if public sector is capable to drive structural change in the
economy
Moving surplus labour from declining sector to rising sectors
To increase pace of capital formation
Reduction in income inequalities
Inclusive growth (& addressing regional disparities)
Stable prices are desirable
Addressing high levels of unemployment
Managing negative impacts of business cycles
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 3
4. IS ‘PLANNING’ FUNCTION STILL NEEDED?
To formulate development financing & administration plans
To allocate foreign assistance in a just manner
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 4
5. HISTORY OF ECONOMIC PLANNING
Planning Periods
Economic coordination (1947-53)
Planning Board (1953-58)
Centralized planning (1958-68)
Disruptions in planning process (1968-80)
Revival of planning process (1981-88)
Structural adjustment programs (1988-99)
Medium-term Perspective Plans (2003-10) & Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers I & II
Framework for Economic Growth (2011-13)
Vision 2025 (2013-2018) & CPEC Long Term Plan
Draft 12th Five Year Plan (2018-23) & Provincial Development Strategies
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 5
6. TERMS OF REFERENCE (FOR
PLANNERS)
oTo prepare a national plan at periodic intervals for the
economic and social development of the country;
oTo make assessments from time to time of the human
and material resources of the country; and
oTo prepare the development plan/budget within the
framework of the national plan and on determination
of priorities, to propose the allocation of resources.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 6
7. PUBLIC INVESTMENT PLANNING &
PROJECTS MANAGEMENT
Approval of Development Projects
Monitoring of Major Projects
Evaluation of on-going and completed projects
Association with EAD/Donors in matters of Foreign
Assistance
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 7
8. FIRST FIVE YEAR PLAN (1955-60)
Sectoral focus: food-grain production
Village Agricultural & Industrial Development (V-AID) areas
Improve irrigation facilities
Increase industrial output in available industries including cotton
cloth, sugar, cement, fertilizers etc.
Infrastructure: Increase installed power capacity; rehabilitate railway
track and rolling stock; provide for self-build houses
Social sectors: Putting 1 million additional children to school; increase
annual number of doctors by 100 and add 9000 hospital beds
Increase rate of development in East Pakistan to reduce regional
disparity.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 8
9. EVALUATION OF FIRST PLAN
Succeeded to some extent in adding to available
infrastructure and industrial growth however much
progress was not seen in agriculture, education and
housing as originally envisaged.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 9
10. SECOND FIVE YEAR PLAN (1960-65)
Increase farm acreage through improved irrigation
Develop new residential facilities
A focus on import substitution and establishing heavy industries
Infrastructure: increase installed power capacity by 508 MW; install
45700 new telephone connections; setting up 1300 new post offices
Continue expansion of education, health and social welfare facilities
Focus on higher investment rate for East Pakistan to reduce regional
disparities.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 10
11. EVALUATION OF SECOND PLAN
Growth in industrial base is observed
However, due to no sunset rule, protectionist policies and tax breaks
gave rise to industrial inefficiencies
Policies to address growing income inequalities proved weak
Prices of consumer goods increased leading to discontentment
among masses.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 11
12. THIRD FIVE YEAR PLAN (1965-70)
Approved in 1965 and revised again in 1966 due to war
Reduce the degree of growing disparity between East & West Pakistan
Industries to focus on producer goods
Strong farm incentives to increase yields
Arrest growth in population and adopt population control measures
Focus on housing, education, and health facilities for lower income
group.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 12
13. EVALUATION OF THIRD PLAN
Growth in heavy industry, mining, transport and finance sectors
Substantial reduction in aid due to war
Budget allocations for social sectors faced cuts
Income inequalities widened due to lack of progressive taxation on
growing sectors. Continued tax concessions allowed concentration of
wealth in few hands.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 13
14. FOURTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1970-75)
Focus on a social justice, reduce disparity in per capita income between
regions
Undertake flood control program in East Pakistan; improve communication
facilities between two wings of the country; launch urban works program,
promote low cost housing
Water & power sector received highest public investment; Self-reliance in
defense-oriented industries, industrial machinery, transport equipment,
intermediate products
Increasing per capita food consumption; Increased focus on exports and
reduce dependence on foreign assistance
Increase television coverage and start education programs and farmer
orientation
Expand family planning programs, curative health facilities, address malaria &
smallpox VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 14
15. NON-PLAN PERIOD (1970-78)
Due to political and economic uncertainty five year plan exercise was
abandoned. The government decided to manage development
administration through annual plans.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 15
16. FIFTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1978-83)
Introduction of modern inputs in agriculture
Liberalizing some industrial controls; completion of Karachi Steel Mill,
fertilizer and cement factories
Rural development program focused on farm sector, rural roads,
small scale industry, water, housing, education & health; village
electrification was expanded
Extending social safety nets through zakat system
Focus on less developed regions e.g. Balochistan province
Focus on schooling, health, and drinking water in rural areas
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 16
17. EVALUATION OF FIFTH FIVE YEAR
PLAN
A modest food surplus was achieved
Economic growth picked up and prices remained stable
Lower income groups gained from expanded social safety nets and
remittances
Total investment as a percentage of GNP was declining; weak long
term investment in physical infrastructure leading to shortages in
energy, telephones, water supplies etc.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 17
18. SIXTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1983-88)
Increasing agriculture production through better seeds, fertilizer and
modern technology; address waterlogging & salinity; new roads from
villages to cities
Focus on achieving self sufficiency in oil supplies
Develop steel based emerging goods, modernization of textiles,
expand agro-based industries; expand vocational training
Focus on improvements to rate of literacy; providing drinking and
drain water facilities
Dedicated funding for tribal and Balochistan areas
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 18
19. EVALUATION OF SIXTH PLAN
Most targets were achieved. Economic growth targets were missed as
envisaged domestic and foreign savings rates could not materialize.
Shortfall in remittances was also observed. Crop sector could also not
help achieve the overall growth target of 6.5% per annum.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 19
20. SEVENTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1988-
93)
Bringing macroeconomic stabilization – focus on fiscal &
current account deficits
A focus on agriculture and industrial development remained
Aimed at addressing gaps in past plans:
Explicit focus on women development
Addressing inequalities in access to education and health
A focus on opening up of markets, privatization, deregulation,
and liberalization
Social Action Program and Tameer-e-Watan program launched
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 20
21. EVALUATION OF SEVENTH PLAN
Overall performance was satisfactory; average economic growth was
5%
Self reliance envisaged in wheat, edible oils, iron-ore, crude oil didn’t
show much improvements
Plan targets were disturbed due to delay in settlement of Afghan war
issues, political uncertainties, civil disturbances 1989-90, floods of
1988-89 and 1992-93.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 21
22. EIGHTH FIVE YEAR PLAN (1993-98)
Achieve growth in a framework of equity and sustainability
Process of deregulation and privatization from previous plan to be
consolidated; retirement of debt through privatization; strengthen
capital markets
Introduce legislative controls on budget
Focus on good governance (public private partnership, devolution and
decentralization etc.)
Documentation, improved tax compliance, lower tariffs
Expansion of motorways network, power sector expansion
Improve immunization, engage village health workers
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 22
23. NINTH, TENTH & ELEVENTH FIVE
YEAR PLAN (1998-2018)
Not officially announced
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 23
24. 10 YEAR PERSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT
PLAN (2001-11)
To be operationalized by ‘Three Year Medium-Term Program (2001-
04)
Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers I & II
Unemployment reduction strategy
Financial sector reform
Micro finance institutions
Fiscal Responsibility Law
Big push in higher education, information technology
Investments in telecom/cellular technologies
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 24
25. FRAMEWORK FOR ECONOMIC
GROWTH (2010-2013)
Aftermath of global financial crisis
This period faced unprecedented power and gas shortages
Closure of several thousand formal and informal MSMEs
Growth strategy therefore proposed that government role be limited
to policy and regulation while production and management of
resources should be left to private sector.
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 25
26. Short Term:
potential 5-6%
Long Term: 7% +
Sustained
How
Utilization of Existing
Capacity
Macroeconomic Stability
Removing Major Constraints
- Energy
Economic Discipline
• Responsible macro Policies
• Reforming public sector enterprises
• Effective PSDP
Improving productivity
1. New role of government
2. Improving Governance & Institutions
3. Market Reforms
4. Urban Management
5. Connectivity
6. Youth & Community
Framework for Economic Growth 2011
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 26
27. VISION 2025 (2014-2018)
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) become the overarching
framework
The vision was operationalized through annual plans, China
Pakistan Long Term Plan, and sectoral policies including auto
sector policy, textile policy etc.
Focus on water, energy, food nexus
SDG prioritization exercise
Focus on knowledge economy, regional connectivity,
institutional reform
Engineering Development Board was shut down (reopened
again after 2018) VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 27
28. GUIDING DOCUMENT AFTER 2018
12th Five Year Plan under formulation
Strategic Trade Policy Framework under formulation
National SME Policy under formulation
IMF Staff Report (April 2020) provides some direction
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 28
29. PLANNING MECHANISMS
National Economic Council (NEC)
Executive Committee of NEC (ECNEC)
Annual Plan Coordination Committee (APCC)
Central Development Working Party (CDWP)
Provincial Development Working Party (PDWP)
Departmental Development Sub-committee (DDC)
Divisional Development Working Party (DDWP)
District Development Committee (DDC)
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 29
30. VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 30
AUTHORITY & SANCTION POWERS
Forum Chairperson Sanction Powers
National Economic Council (NEC) Prime Minister Federation Budget
Executive Committee of NEC
(ECNEC)
PM/Finance Minister PKR 10 billion and above
Annual Plan Coordination
Committee (APCC)
Planning, Development
& SI Division Minister
Advisory body for
development budget
Central Development Working
Party (CDWP)
Deputy Chairman,
Planning Commission
Upto PKR 10 billion (& federal
DDWP can approve up to 2
billion)
Provincial Development Working
Party (PDWP)
Chairman, P&D Board PKR 200 million to PKR
10,000 million
Departmental Development Sub-
committee (DDC)
Secretary of department PKR 200 million upto PKR
400 million
Divisional Development Working
Party (DDWP)
Divisional Commissioner upto PKR 200 million
District Development Committee District Coordination upto PKR 50 million
31. PROJECT CYCLE: PC I, PC II, PC
III, PC IV, PC V
•Introduced in September 1952
•Forms revised from time to time
•Forms vary by sector
•Project manuals for guidance prepared by
Planning Commission and provincial
Planning & Development Departments
•Guidelines for Foreign Assistance Projects
•Delegation of Financial Power Rules
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 31
32. PROJECT CYCLE (PC-I)
PC-I Performa : is the basic form on which all
projects are required to be drawn up
PC-I form comprises of four components
Project Digest (Name, Location, Sponsor, Completion)
Project Description & Detailed Financing Plan
Project Requirements (Human & Material Resources)
Environmental Aspects
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 32
33. PC-II Performa
Feasibility studies or survey studies
PC-III: Designed to furnish information on the
programme of on-going projects on quarterly basis
Any changes in scope of design
Any revisions
Any changes in management of project
PC-IV: Project History (Physical Completion of
Project)
Accounts Closed/amount unaccounted
Employment generated by the project
Suggestions for future planning
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 33
34. PC-V is to be furnished on annual basis for a
period of five years by operating agency
Review of costs
Review of financial results
Arrangements for maintenance of project
Difficulties experienced in operation, marketing etc.
Repercussion of scheme
General observation of relevant department/ministry
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 34
35. VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 35
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF PLANNING
PROCESS
Administrative
Issues
HR
capabilities
Coordinatio
n across
fora
Inadequate or
delayed
funding
Throwforwa
rd
Cost and
time
overruns
Procuremen
t delays
Lack of pre-
requisite tasks
Feasibility
study
Sector/mark
et surveys
Weak learning
process
Accountabili
ty and
learning for
monitoring
and
evaluation
Feedback
loop
36. 36
MAHBUB UL HAQ (1973)
7 Sins of
Planners
Numbers
Game
Excessive
Control
Investmen
t quality
Develop
ment
Fashions
Divorce
between
Planning &
Implementati
on
Growth
without
Justice
Neglect of
Human
Resources
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV
37. PLANNING AS A CONTINUOUS
PROCESS
Set Future Standards
(Benchmarking)
Define /
Organize Goals
Measure
Results
Implement
Empower Teams
to Act
(Resources,
processes)
Prioritize Actions
(Short/long-term)
Design Specific
Actions
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 37
38. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING– SOME
FUTURE CHOICES
Business-as-usual – federal and provinces continue to
plan in their own domains
Transforming Planning Commission into Secretariat of
CCI
Break-up Ministry of Planning, Development & SI and
offer capacities of all sectoral sections to line
ministries; strengthen planning cells at line ministries;
provinces could follow same VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 38
39. PLANNING TEMPLATES ABROAD
India – Planning Division abolished; Planning
Commission converted into NITI Ayog – policy think
tank of central government
Malaysia – Planning machinery acts as Prime Minister’s
Performance Delivery Unit at PM Office
China – National Development & Reform Commission
model with active involvement in planning and
budgeting of state resources – mini state council
VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 39
40. WAY FORWARD
Efficient planning mechanisms are necessary; parliament needs
regular discussion on future of planning
Citizens, investors & donors demand a clear vision for medium-
term
A regular functional review of all planning departments desired;
post-18th Amendment planning & coordination should be
studied together by federal & provincial planning bodies
Role of planning machinery inevitable for laggard areas,
regional connectivity, and projects involving inter-provincial
development coordination. Responding to SDGs related
international obligations
Making PC-I – PC-V reports public to inform citizens regarding
planning dynamics. VAQAR AHMED | WWW.SDPI.ORG | WWW.SDPI.TV 40
In-spite of the grave economic and financial problems which beset the Government of Pakistan soon after independence, a Development Board was established early in 1948 in Economic Affairs Division to deal with questions of rapid economic development of the country. In 1950 a Six-Year Development Plan was formulated and embodied in the Colombo Plan for Cooperative Economic Development in South and South East Asia. This was essentially an outline plan and delineated only a broad pattern of development.
To prepare a more comprehensive national plan of development, the Government of Pakistan decided to set up a Planning Board on 18th July, 1953, with Mr. Zahid Hussain, ex-Governor of State Bank of Pakistan as its first Chairman and two other members. The purpose and terms of reference of the Board were set forth as below:-
The economic and social objectives of Government's Policy are to develop the resources of the country as rapidly as possible so as to promote the welfare of the people, provide adequate living standards, and social services, secure social justice and equality of opportunity to all and aim at the widest and most equitable distribution of national wealth.
For details: ‘Economy of Pakistan’ by Khwaja Amjad Saeed.
Qureshi. M. L. Planning & Development in Pakistan 1947-1982. Vanguard Books
E-payments
E-payments
Source: Delegation of Financial Powers Rules, 2016
Numbers Game: Endless amounts of work is wasted into fixing econometric models and not enough into policy formulation and decent project appraisal.
Excessive Control: Economic policies are made under direct administrative controls which dilute their impact. It is wrongly assumed that planning means encouragement of public sector and imposition of controls to regulate economic activity.
Investment Illusion: Planners keep a tight focus on if the investment level is going up or down. They forget about what the investment really consists of (quality of investment), how productive it is? How far investment is going in human resources in comparison to physical capital.
Development fashions: Economic planners are addicted to development fashions (sometimes dictated by donors). One must remember that constant shifts in development strategy often lead nowhere.
Divorce between planning & implementation: When pressed hard to explain failures, planners often argue that implementation is not their responsibility. A good plan must come up with a realistic blueprint for its own implementation.
Growth without Justice: Very often growth has meant little social justice. It has been accompanied by rising unemployment, worsening social services and increasing poverty.
Neglect of human resources: It is assumed that development human resources will require longer gestation period of investment. However while visiting China in 1967, I noticed that with in a short period of time, the Chinese appear to have imparted technical and vocational education to most of their population. The long gestation period was reduced by concentrating on functional short-term courses in specialized skills.