SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Effect of names on the preferences of food




Abstract                                          The objective of this report is to determine
                                                  the effect of names on the preferences of
The objective of this study is to find out the    food. The study were conducted by using a
effect of descriptive name on the preferences     questionnaire having two different names of
of the food. A questionnaire was made             same food one is traditional and other is
having six foods with both traditional and        descriptive. Then results were analysed
descriptive names. Questionnaire conduction       using different statistical approaches and
was done among 25 people belonging to             determine the effect of descriptive name on
different countries. The results were analysed    the preferences of food.
using Chi-square test on SPSS 16 software.
Results showed significant acceptance of          Methods and materials
descriptive names over traditional names.
Descriptive names also increased the sale of      To determine how people respond to
food product. The dietary habits of people        descriptive name a questionnaire was made
can be changed by the use of names having         having names of six restaurant foods. Each
attractive descriptive names.                     food is given two names one is its traditional
                                                  name and other is the descriptive name.
Introduction                                      Then the questionnaire is distributed to 25
                                                  people belonging to different nations to
Sensory analysis is used to evoke, measure,       select the food which they like the most. The
analyse and interpret reactions to those          traditional and descriptive names of the food
characteristics of food and material as they      are given in table 1 below.
perceived by the senses of sight, smell, taste,
touch and hearing. Can descriptive names of       Table 1
food suggestively influence the perceived             Traditional names      Descriptive names
taste of particular food? A person’s                   Chicken Biryani    Bombay Traditional Biryani
expectation about the taste of a food can
                                                        Chinese Rice      Mixed Chicken & Vegetable
have a remarkable impact on their sensory                                             Rice
evaluation of it. The food labelling plays an          Chicken Korma         Spicy Italian Chicken
important in the sale of the product.                                                Korma
Descriptive and traditional names for food are          Chicken Soup       French Creamy Chicken
frequently found on different restaurant                                             Soup
menus and the use of favourably descriptive            Grilled Chicken     Smokey Grilled Chicken
name has been shown to increase sales of               Chicken Karahi      Buttery Topped Chicken
those items by 27% (Wansink et al., 2001).                                          Karahi
Descriptive names might add a positive            The questionnaires were colleted and then
impact to a food, they might increase the sale    results were analysed to see the effect of
of food if consumer like that name or might       descriptive names on the preferences of
reduced the sale if consumer do not like that     foods
food. It is fact that more work is done on the
advertising and packaging of food to catch        Statistics
the customer rather than quality of food
(Wansink et al., 2005).                           The results were analysed using SPSS 16
software. Chi-square test was applied to                          Table 3
analyse results and bar char is made to see                        Chi-Square Tests
                                                                                                           Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig.     Exact Sig.
whether there is difference in traditional and                                           Value    df       (2-sided)   (2-sided)      (1-sided)
descriptive name or not.                                           Pearson Chi-Square    1.500a   1        .000
                                                                   Continuity            145.95
                                                                                                  1        .000
                                                                   Correctionb           5
Results and discussion                                             Likelihood Ratio      205.27
                                                                                         0
                                                                                                  1        .000

                                                                                                                         .000         .000
Chi-square test was conducted to examine                           Fisher's Exact Test
                                                                   Linear-by-Linear      149.00
                                                                                                  1        .000
whether the descriptive food names                                 Association           0
                                                                   N of Valid Cases      150
influenced sensory perceptions (descriptive                        a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
names versus traditional name). The results                        28.17.
                                                                   b. Computed only for a 2x2
show that descriptive names affect the                             table
preferences of food. Table 2 provides details                     Bar chart 1
about the descriptive names that 85% people
like the descriptive name and 65% people do
not like that.
Table 2
Descriptive Names * Traditional Names Crosstabulation




                                    Traditional Names




                                             don’t
                                    like     like       Total
                                                                The likeness of the people towards
Descriptive    like    Count        0        85         85
Names                  Expected
                                                                descriptive names is more than traditional
                                    36.8     48.2       85.0
                       Count                                    names which can see from bar chart 1. This
               don’t   Count        65       0          65      is due to the selection of food dishes is
               like    Expected
                       Count
                                    28.2     36.8       65.0    particularly for Asian community and also the
               Total   Count        65       85         150     questionnaire conduction was done among
                       Expected
                                    65.0     85.0       150.0
                                                                them. Moreover, packaging of the food
                       Count
                                                                material and presentation of the food may
                                                                also affect the selection of food and it could
The likeness of the people is more towards                      be particularly more important with relatively
the descriptive names. Previous work has                        unfamiliar product categories (Tuorila et al.,
shown descriptive names not only increase                       1998).
the sales of the food but also improved                         Conclusion
expectation related to the food and to the
                                                                         From the study conducted above it is
restaurant (Wansink et al., 2001). The
                                                                concluded that descriptive names effects the
selection of the names also contributes to the
                                                                preferences of food. A clear increase in the
preferences of the food. Food selection also
                                                                acceptance of descriptive names by the
differs with respect to locality of the food. For
                                                                people is evidence that likeness of the people
example “Chicken Biryani” and “Bombay
                                                                towards descriptive names food is more than
Traditional Biryani” are names of same food
                                                                traditional one.
but people belonging to India prefer Bombay
Traditional Biryani over Chicken Biryani                        References
because that name related to their native                       Wansink B., Painter J.E. and Ittersum K.V., (2005). How descriptive
                                                                food names bias sensory perceptions in restaurants. Food Quality
country. So while selecting the names of food                   and Preference, 16, 393–400.
in a restaurant we should care about the                        Wansink B., Painter J.M. and Ittersum K.V., (2001). Descriptive
nationally and eating habits of the people                      menu labels_ effect on sales. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant
                                                                Administrative Quarterly, 42, 68–72.
living in that area. The bar chat 1 below gives
                                                                Tuorila H.M., Meiselman H.L., Cardello A.V. and Lesher L.L., (1998).
a clear view of preference of descriptive                       Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on
names over traditional.                                         acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 9,
                                                                421–430.

More Related Content

Featured

Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Kurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them well
Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them wellGood Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them well
Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them well
Saba Software
 

Featured (20)

Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
 
ChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slidesChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slides
 
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike RoutesMore than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
 
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
 
Barbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
Barbie - Brand Strategy PresentationBarbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
Barbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
 
Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them well
Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them wellGood Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them well
Good Stuff Happens in 1:1 Meetings: Why you need them and how to do them well
 

Effect of names on the preferences of food

  • 1. Effect of names on the preferences of food Abstract The objective of this report is to determine the effect of names on the preferences of The objective of this study is to find out the food. The study were conducted by using a effect of descriptive name on the preferences questionnaire having two different names of of the food. A questionnaire was made same food one is traditional and other is having six foods with both traditional and descriptive. Then results were analysed descriptive names. Questionnaire conduction using different statistical approaches and was done among 25 people belonging to determine the effect of descriptive name on different countries. The results were analysed the preferences of food. using Chi-square test on SPSS 16 software. Results showed significant acceptance of Methods and materials descriptive names over traditional names. Descriptive names also increased the sale of To determine how people respond to food product. The dietary habits of people descriptive name a questionnaire was made can be changed by the use of names having having names of six restaurant foods. Each attractive descriptive names. food is given two names one is its traditional name and other is the descriptive name. Introduction Then the questionnaire is distributed to 25 people belonging to different nations to Sensory analysis is used to evoke, measure, select the food which they like the most. The analyse and interpret reactions to those traditional and descriptive names of the food characteristics of food and material as they are given in table 1 below. perceived by the senses of sight, smell, taste, touch and hearing. Can descriptive names of Table 1 food suggestively influence the perceived Traditional names Descriptive names taste of particular food? A person’s Chicken Biryani Bombay Traditional Biryani expectation about the taste of a food can Chinese Rice Mixed Chicken & Vegetable have a remarkable impact on their sensory Rice evaluation of it. The food labelling plays an Chicken Korma Spicy Italian Chicken important in the sale of the product. Korma Descriptive and traditional names for food are Chicken Soup French Creamy Chicken frequently found on different restaurant Soup menus and the use of favourably descriptive Grilled Chicken Smokey Grilled Chicken name has been shown to increase sales of Chicken Karahi Buttery Topped Chicken those items by 27% (Wansink et al., 2001). Karahi Descriptive names might add a positive The questionnaires were colleted and then impact to a food, they might increase the sale results were analysed to see the effect of of food if consumer like that name or might descriptive names on the preferences of reduced the sale if consumer do not like that foods food. It is fact that more work is done on the advertising and packaging of food to catch Statistics the customer rather than quality of food (Wansink et al., 2005). The results were analysed using SPSS 16
  • 2. software. Chi-square test was applied to Table 3 analyse results and bar char is made to see Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig. whether there is difference in traditional and Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided) descriptive name or not. Pearson Chi-Square 1.500a 1 .000 Continuity 145.95 1 .000 Correctionb 5 Results and discussion Likelihood Ratio 205.27 0 1 .000 .000 .000 Chi-square test was conducted to examine Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear 149.00 1 .000 whether the descriptive food names Association 0 N of Valid Cases 150 influenced sensory perceptions (descriptive a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is names versus traditional name). The results 28.17. b. Computed only for a 2x2 show that descriptive names affect the table preferences of food. Table 2 provides details Bar chart 1 about the descriptive names that 85% people like the descriptive name and 65% people do not like that. Table 2 Descriptive Names * Traditional Names Crosstabulation Traditional Names don’t like like Total The likeness of the people towards Descriptive like Count 0 85 85 Names Expected descriptive names is more than traditional 36.8 48.2 85.0 Count names which can see from bar chart 1. This don’t Count 65 0 65 is due to the selection of food dishes is like Expected Count 28.2 36.8 65.0 particularly for Asian community and also the Total Count 65 85 150 questionnaire conduction was done among Expected 65.0 85.0 150.0 them. Moreover, packaging of the food Count material and presentation of the food may also affect the selection of food and it could The likeness of the people is more towards be particularly more important with relatively the descriptive names. Previous work has unfamiliar product categories (Tuorila et al., shown descriptive names not only increase 1998). the sales of the food but also improved Conclusion expectation related to the food and to the From the study conducted above it is restaurant (Wansink et al., 2001). The concluded that descriptive names effects the selection of the names also contributes to the preferences of food. A clear increase in the preferences of the food. Food selection also acceptance of descriptive names by the differs with respect to locality of the food. For people is evidence that likeness of the people example “Chicken Biryani” and “Bombay towards descriptive names food is more than Traditional Biryani” are names of same food traditional one. but people belonging to India prefer Bombay Traditional Biryani over Chicken Biryani References because that name related to their native Wansink B., Painter J.E. and Ittersum K.V., (2005). How descriptive food names bias sensory perceptions in restaurants. Food Quality country. So while selecting the names of food and Preference, 16, 393–400. in a restaurant we should care about the Wansink B., Painter J.M. and Ittersum K.V., (2001). Descriptive nationally and eating habits of the people menu labels_ effect on sales. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administrative Quarterly, 42, 68–72. living in that area. The bar chat 1 below gives Tuorila H.M., Meiselman H.L., Cardello A.V. and Lesher L.L., (1998). a clear view of preference of descriptive Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on names over traditional. acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Quality and Preference, 9, 421–430.