In this webinar, we outline the key themes surrounding the state of the guard industry, highlighting some of the ways in which security firms are mitigating the risks associated with turnover to retain talent, hire skilled guards, and minimize costs associated with onboarding and administration.
Call Girls in Delhi, Escort Service Available 24x7 in Delhi 959961-/-3876
Guarding Outlook: Trends in Hiring, Retention and Turnover
1. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
The Guarding Outlook:
Trends in Hiring, Retention and Turnover
March 26, 2019
2. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
AGENDA
1
2
3
4
The Guarding Outlook: Analysis of the current market
Top Challenges in the Industry: How turnover is a catalyst for operations
Technology’s Impact: Where companies are leveraging technology
Industry View: How guard firms are facing these challenges head-on
3. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
DRIVERS
What is the impact of record low unemployment coupled
with rising minimum wage?
How are you paying your guards to promote retention?
Largest Consolidation of the Market Record Low Unemployment Increased Regulatory Action & Oversight
WHAT TO WALK AWAY WITH
4. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
Lisa Dolan, CPP
President,
Chief Executive Officer / Founder
• Founded Securit® as a product safety company
• Grew the company exponentially by adding Security Guard
and Investigative services
• Certified in Security Management as a “Certified Protection
Professional”
• ASIS Professional Certification Board
• Licensed Private Investigator
• Co-founder of TDI; a computer supply company TDI
was acquired by OfficeMax in 1997
• Joined Valiant to head up Sales, Marketing and
Business Development
• 19 years experience with Valiant solutions, serving the
security market throughout all operations
• Attended, facilitated and participated in ASIS,
CALSAGA, ASSIST, NCISS and Valiant's National
executive roundtable events
Jeff DiDomenico
VP of Business Development
TODAY’S SPEAKERS
5. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
30 YEARS OF GUARDING
2018
Company Employees
Allied Universal 140,000
Securitas 110,500
G4S Secure Solutions USA 57,000
National Security Alliance 14,661
Andy Frain Services, 11,750
SecurAmerica 7,000
SOS Security 6,500
Whelan Security 5,700
Walden Security 5,500
Command Security Corp. 5,200
DSI Security 4,300
Covenant Services Worldwide 4,200
St. Moritz Security Services 3,000
United American Security 2,825
Madison Security Group 2,465
Per Mar Security & Research 2,036
SunStates Security 1,936
APG Security 1,882
CPS Security Solutions 1,600
Monterrey Security Consultants 1,500
Elite Investigations 1,453
Titan Security Group 1,400
Vinson Guard Service 1,125
Premier Security/Apex3 Security 1,100
Arrow Security 1,100
Cambridge Security 1,000
Monument Security 950
United Security 850
Master Security 810
GMI Guard Management 600
1990
Company Employees
Burns International Security Services 42,868
Pinkerton's Inc. 24,206
The Wackenhut Corporation 22,000
Wells Fargo Guard Services 15,100
American Protective Services 10,500
Guardsmark, Inc. 8,000
Stanley Smith Security Inc. 8,000
Allied Security 6,958
Advance Security, Inc. 5,000
Security Bureau 5,000
Murray Guard 3,400
First Security 2,800
Professional Seecurity Bureau 2,800
Weiser Security 2,600
Barton Protective Services 2,500
Effective Security Systems 2,500
American Security and Invest. Svcs. 2,500
United Security Group 2,300
SecuriGuard 2,250
Security Forces, Inc. 2,200
Pedus Security Services 2,000
Security Operations Systems 2,000
Command Security Corp 1,815
Doyle Detective Bureau 1,680
Bell Security 1,550
SpectaGuard 1,500
D.B. Kelly Associates 1,400
OCS Security 1,300
A&R Security and Investigative Services 1,258
Guardian Guard Services 1,200
Per Mar Security Services 1,150
Vinson Guard Service, Inc. 975
Lansdell Protective Agency 900
McRoberts Protective Agency 800
MVM, Inc, 760
193,770
399,943
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
Total Lives in
1990
Total Lives in
2018
5,536
13,331
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Average Guard Firm Size
in 1990
Average Guard Firm Size
in 2018
6. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
50% OF THE MARKET’S REVENUE
is held by 4 major security guard firms
25% 15% 6% 2%
1528
787
644
231
60 31 27 26 20 12 8 9
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Number of Guarding Firms by Employee Size
Over 87% of the market
is made up of Companies
under 250 employees
A MARKET VIEW
According to a report published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, more than 78 million Americans* — or nearly 59 percent of the U.S. workforce
— are hourly workers. Encapsulating such a substantial percentage of the workforce, it’s vital that companies implement employee development
programs that will focus on this underserved sector of the American workforce.
*https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/minimum-wage/2015/home.htm
$44b
$24.5b
$11.9b
$6.6b
Outsourced & In-
House Security
Industry
Outsourced Contract
Security Industry Revenues For The 3
Industry Leaders
Revenues for the 2
Majority Foreign-
Owned Industry
Leaders
800k
8k
Companies in
the U.S.
5%
Organic Growth For
The U.S. Market
6.5%
Total Revenue
Growth For the U.S.
Market
Outsourced
Security Officers
7. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
1-100 101-250 251-1000 Over 1000
56%
19%
13% 13%
THE GUARDING OUTLOOK
Number of Clients ServedSeniority LevelSecurity Guard Firms By State
Series 1
17%
3%
8. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31
Pay Rate Bell Curve*
Low
Avg =
$14/hr
High
Avg =
$23/hr
Avg =
$17/hr
14%
39%
48%
14%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
No Overtime Under 3% 3-7% Over 7%
Non Billable Overtime
86% incur some level
of Non-Billable O/T
*Assumption: Broad Scope, takes into account Armed and
Unarmed Guards, from all States, showing a wide-ranging average
OPERATIONAL OUTLOOK
9. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
TOP CHALLENGES
1. Turnover: The ability to attract, onboard & retain talent for security work
2. Non-Billable Overtime: Incurring overtime that you cannot bill the client for
3. Wage & Labor Compliance: Ensuring that you are meeting the acceptable U.S. Department of Labor requirements (ACA, FMLA, FSLA, etc)
4. Payroll & Billing: The ability to accurately run payroll in a timely manner and bill clients quickly, and get paid on time
5. Margins & Profitability: The ability to maintain or increase margins on client accounts and overall profitability for your company
1
Turnover
2
Non-Billable
Overtime
3
Wage & Labor
Compliance
4
Payroll & Billing
5
Margins &
Profitability
10. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
TOP CHALLENGES
Turnover
leads to lack
of resources…
filled to posts,
incurring NBOT…
that cut into
profit margins.
1
Turnover
2
Non-Billable
Overtime
3
Wage & Labor
Compliance
4
Payroll & Billing
5
Margins &
Profitability
11. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
• 3.8% Record LOW Unemployment Rate
• More Variety in the Job Market
Free Products
Company Stock
Full Benefits Package
College Tuition
Employee Discount
Competitive Pay Rate
Full Benefits Package
Tuition Reimbursement
Partner Discounts
Competitive Pay Rate
Full Benefits Package
Tuition Reimbursement
Security Firms must compete with non-security industries for talent:
Employee Discounts
Competitive Pay Rate
Full Benefits Package
Tuition Reimbursement
WHAT IS DRIVING TURNOVER?
• Competing with Other Industries
• Rise in the Minimum Wage
12. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
ADDRESSING TURNOVER?
Sourcing & Retaining Talent
National Average, Hourly Workers = 62%
0-25% 25-75% Over 75%
Turnover Rates
13. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
LOOKING AHEAD –
FUTURE STATE
26%
26%
21%
19%
6%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Job Boards
Referrals
In-house HR team
Classifieds / Craigslist
Recruiters
45% Digital
Outreach
27%
HR
Driven
26%
Referral
HOW ARE FIRMS FINDING TALENT?
Text Open Rate = 99%
Text Response Rate = 37%
Email Open Rate = 8%
Email Response Rate = 2%
14. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
What is involved with Cost to Hire?
It’s more comprehensive than you think:
Job Boards
Drug Tests
Background
Onboarding
Certifications
Training
Uniforms
Re-Training
Admin. Work
Fire Safety
COST TO HIRE: WHAT IS THE TRUE COST?
Cost per
Employee/Month to Hire
15. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
COST TO HIRE NEEDS TO FACTOR TURNOVER
Take
$100/Employee/Month
Or
$1200/year
0-25% 25-75% Over 75%
Take 50% Turnover Rate
For every $1 Spent on Hiring, a
$1 is LOST to Turnover:
50% turnover at $100 per
employee per month =
$1200/per employee/year
LOST
A $100 cost is really $200
when you apply Turnover rates
Turnover Rates
Cost per Employee/Month to Hire
16. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
• Eliminating the “Domino Effect”
• Morale Affects Performance
• Impact on Security / Vulnerability
• Two Ways to Mitigate Risk – “Triage”
HOW DO YOU RECRUIT?
17. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
THE “TRIAGE” APPROACH
• Honesty in the interview
• Filtering your Candidates
• Provide Pros and Cons
• Interaction with Supervisors
Pre-Hire
• Compliance
• Training and Re-Training
• Incentivization
• Acknowledgment
• Benefits
Post-Hire
18. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
Will Technology Adoption impact Human Capital?
TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN GUARDING
A Means To Streamline Operations Amidst Challenges
19. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
RETAIL SPACE GOING DARK
More than
90 million
square feet
of retail space
closed by Q2
in 2018.
The Record Breaking Numbers of Retail Space Closures in 2018
Source: CoStar Group
20. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
RETAIL SECURITY
HOW WILL
TECHNOLOGY
IMPACT HUMAN
CAPITAL?
CASE IN POINT: TECHNOLOGY’S IMPACT
21. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
5%
22%
54%
19%
Manual –
Boards, paper,
etc.
Spreadsheets,
Email, Text
Messaging
Desktop
Workforce
software
Mobile
Workforce
Software
Type of Technology Adoption
Do not
TOP SOFTWARE DEPLOYMENT
70%Use Software
Do not
30%
22. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
74%
are using Mobile
to augment their
Operations
26%
24%
18%
16%
9%
7%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Touring and Checkpoint Management
Incident Management Tracking
Punch in and Punch out
Push Notifications
Shift Posting and Swapping
None of the Above
Top Uses of Mobile Technology in Security
MOBILITY IN GUARDING
23. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
• Guarding Market is in the Mid-Market Majority
• Turnover is a Catalyst for driving other Operational Challenges
• Low Unemployment + Rising Minimum Wage = Risk!
• Digital Outreach Remains a Major Trending Method for Hiring
• Beware of Cost to Hire Coupled with Turnover = True Cost
• Technology Adoption is strong, with Mobile becoming Key to Success
• Use Technology to Streamline Operations, Reduce Cost & Increase Margins
CONCLUSION
24. Copyright 2019 Valiant Solutions, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential
QUESTIONS?
Our integrated Workforce Solution is purpose-built
for the Security Industry, backed by a team with
more security expertise than any other solution
provider.
Technology + Experience = Results.
OPERATE SMARTER.
www.valiant.com
1.800.521.4555
Editor's Notes
Hi everyone, I’d like to thank you all for joining us today. My name is Jeff DiDomenico, VP of Business Development at Valiant and I am joined with Lisa Dolan, who is the President, Chief Executive Officer / Founder of Securit®. Today we’re going to talk to you about some of the current trends in the Security Guard Space around key challenges and analysis around Turnover, Hiring and Retention as a major impact on the Security Guard industry. We have some interesting data we will share, and Lisa has joined us to provide some insight into how guard firms like hers are addressing challenges within their operations. Let’s get started.
Thank you and welcome to todays webinar. What we’d like to cover today involves the guarding industry and the challenges that are impacting operations. We recently conducted a survey, the first of it’s kind, to the market to truly understand the market impact the size of the market and the top challenges. So we will review the guarding industry in aggregate, as a whole and with respect to our survey. Then, from the data, we will outline what the respondents said were the top challenges facing operations. We will also spend some time looking at technology’s impact on these challenges and how companies are currently leveraging technology. And, throughout the presentation, we will be getting feedback and commentary from one of your own – lisa dolan. Let’s get going and talk a little about our speakers for today.
If I had to summarize what will be covered today, it centers around this. We have been experiencing one of the largest market consolidations to date, and with a combination of record low unemployment and increased regulatory action and oversight, the industry has many challenges related to hiring and compliance. So what we would like you to keep in mind in against these drivers is,
“What is the impact of record low unemployment coupled with rising minimum wage?
How are you paying your guards to promote retention?
Jeff’s entrepreneurial experience began in 1984, as co-founder of TDI; a typewriter rental company which grew over 13 years to become one of the nation’s leading distributors of computer supplies. TDI was also recognized by MetLife as vendor of the year, along with major companies IBM, Lexmark and 3M. In 1997 TDI was acquired by office product giant OfficeMax.
Lisa’s career began in the field of Correctional Administration. She founded Securit® as a product safety company and grew the company exponentially by partnering with Joseph & Lisa Garcia and adding Security Guard and Investigative services. Lisa’s direct responsibility is Federal Government Liaison, Business development, Strategic planning and instilling excellent service at every level within the company. Lisa is Board Certified in Security Management as a “Certified Protection Professional” and is a Board member for Private Security Company’s within the American Society for Industrial Security (ASIS). Lisa Dolan holds many trademarks and copyrights in the safety industry and is a graduate from John Jay College of Criminal Justice with degrees in Criminal Justice and Correctional Administration. She is also licensed as a Private Investigator.
Before we start and look ahead, let’s look back. In the 30 years of guarding, we have seen a stark shift in the growth of the industry, which is encouraging. While many of the core players still remain, there are many that have been absorbed or merged with larger firms. But over the 30 years the number of lives in service has grown over 100% and the average guard firm size in terms of employees has grown 116%.
In the Security Guard industry, there is a tremendous level of complexity and market factors that are creating various challenges to reduce costs, improve profitability and operate in the most efficient manner possible. It’s one thing to theorize about market challenges and make assumptions, however it is far more valuable and insightful to take a more quantitative approach and analyze data points to examine trends in security guard operations.
In this webinar, we will look at a comprehensive set of data from the Security Guard sector that outlines not only the key challenges facing guard companies today, but also look at how technology is becoming a mitigating factor in their operations.
Compiling a data set from a wide range of Security Guard Companies was an important factor in ensuring a wide range of responses, in order to get a clear picture of top challenges and operations. We conducted a survey of a sample set of guard firms within the U.S. ranging in size and scope.
The guard firms that participated spanned a wide range throughout the continental U.S., however the majority of guard firms centered around California, New York, and Texas. This is in line with the market distribution, which is similar across the wider market.
Looking at the size of the firms in the market, we saw an interesting distribution in terms of number of employees. Again, looking at the distribution, the largest grouping is under 100 employees per company. This is not surprising, since the wider market has a larger segment of the market that is on the Small to Mid-Sized Business size. The size distribution fits in line with the wider market.
In terms of the seniority level of individuals that were surveyed, we saw a larger distribution of senior level employees that participated. This is typical for many security guard firms; the owner and C-levels are very much involved in the operational aspects, especially the smaller sized organizations. This also provides a unique perspective on the results of the data; having a top-down view provides a much more accurate viewpoint on the operational aspects of Security Guard Operations.
The last data point to illustrate the firms in the survey are around the number of clients served. With many security firms, the number of clients they contract with can also determine the level of operations needed and contribute to the level of complexity. So with this data set, we saw a nice, even distribution of companies serving different number of clients, which provides a good sample set of different company sizes and scopes:
The Typical Guard Owner:
Does not disclose pay rates
Does not share data
Competes with each other for talent
Does not track metrics for
Taking into account the demographics of the firms participating, it’s important to look at the overall operations aspect of the business. Mainly, what are companies doing to ensure that they are operating efficiently and minimizing costs and keeping profits?
Let’s look at the overall pay rates. Pay will vary by size of the company, bill rates that can be contracted, and number of clients. However, within the survey, most of the respondents varied from low average of $14/hour to higher averages in the $23/hour:
In addition, when looking at operational efficiency and how the workforce is distributed, it’s important to understand the idea of Non-Billable Overtime. Incurring Non-billable Overtime can be an indication of an organization’s ability to adequately staff resources that are under hours to fill a post. The inability to post resources that are under hours can be a leading indicator of lack of resources, lack of visibility into schedules, or overall efficiency of a company’s ability to operate.
In this case, only 14% over respondents highlighted a 0% overtime rate that is not billable. The remaining 86% had some level of overtime that they incur, which cannot be billed to the client. This is a leading indicator that there is some level of risk associated with operations around resources. Causal factor that lead to this will be explored in the next section.
When analyzing the data to this point, you see a large number of smaller guard firms operating in the market, with a fairly competitive pay rate compared to other market sectors (the average is double the Minimum wage rate). Still, 86% of guard firms are forced to incur some level of Non-billable Overtime, which can be attributed to a number of factor, most notably the ability to staff the appropriate resources that are under hours to meet the scheduling needs.
Based on this assumption, what did the participants say were the biggest challenges facing operations today?
It is pretty clear, and overwhelming that the majority of respondent cited Turnover as one of the major challenges facing their operations today. The ability to not only atttract new talent, but retain talent is one of the largest challenges in the industry.
Workforce is a strategic Asset - expecations
The second and third major points are the margins and profitability, followed by the non-billable overtime. However, it’s important to note and surmise that one challenge can clearly lead into another. Without the right amount of resources to work a post, companies are forced to post overtime that is not billable to honor their contract, which is ultimately not billable, which factors into the overall margin and profitability.
Turnover is often seen as the catalyst to other challenges in the guard firms. So what are companies doing today to mitigate risk of Turnover?
Beyond stats, here’s an anecdote: Webster noted a Wendy’s franchise owner who said he experienced a 40 percent turnover rate, noting that it would cost as much as $2,000 to hire, train, onboard and pay workers. That all changed when he offered real-time payments for wages earned — reducing corporate costs, along with acquiring and retaining workers. It makes sense, Frew noted, when gig workers who also have QSR jobs may need to opt for the former (where they may get paid more quickly) to supplement income, taking a sick day from the fast food shift to make it all happen. It’s a ripple effect that hits employers and employee
With an overwhelming competitive wage market, the guard service firms are not just faced with competitive turnover – losing to another peer – but also turnover to other industries. Favorable wage rates and a historically low unemployment rate contribute to resources leaving the industry altogether to seek better pay rates. This is a major challenge to try and offer a competitive rate for a job that demands more of it’s employees for security and safety of a client. Retail is one of the largest competitive threats to the guarding industry today – the wage rates from big box stores can impact the ability to retain talent, and security firms are forced to maintain competitive wage rates to retain business. Ultimately, this cuts into their margins, which can force a company too seek efficiencies in operations.
How much turnover is being seen in the industry? When asked about turnover rates, the figures were alarming. The National Turnover rate in the last few years (as presented by Mercer Data was around 22%. This will obviously vary by industry, but serves as a baseline.
While 48% fell in line with the national average, the reality is that in the security guard space, over 50% of the industry is seeing a turnover rate that is higher than the national average. This simply shows that this level of turnover is not indicative of a larger national shift, but that security firms are seeing higher turnover rates than the average.
How are firms sourcing and retaining new applicants? And How much is spent in their overall budget to recruit and onboard resources? This becomes a data point that can illustrate the level of effort required to keep the turnover trend at bay.
What’s interesting is the wide range of options that are employed by security guard firms. This indicates that there is no “magic bullet” in terms of recruiting talent; companies are trying various different ways to build their applicant pool. 45% of firms are using some sort of digital outreach, whether through job boards or craigslist, while another 27% are leveraging more traditional HR teams and recruiters to seek out applicants.
Perhaps the most interesting factor is the 26% that stated referrals still are a major source of their recruitment methods. This is particularly of note in that referrals are a lower cost source of recruitment and often can help to alleviate the burden of building a talent pool through paid methods. Whether this is employee referral or client referral, it still stands to reason that security firms still have the ability to attract talent through this method.
What’s not outlined in the figure above is the actual cost to that is incurred for each employee that is hired. Looking at the same group, we asked what the average employee cost per month to hire and onboard, including the cost of the recruiting methods, training and onboarding.
As you can see, the figures are fairly split evenly, ranging from under $100 to over $300 per month per employee to attract, hire and onboard new talent. This isn’t completely surprising, considering that there is a need to keep hiring costs low. This rate is well below the national average, but for a low-margin business, it’s important to be as lean as possible when looking to increase resources.
Let’s just run an example against the data to see the impact. If we know that the majority of guard firms are seeing 25-75% turnover (let’s take an average of 50%) and it costs an average of $100 per employee per month to hire and onboard, what is the impact?
50% turnover at $100 per employee per month = $1200/per employee/year LOST
This means that for every $1 we spend on an employee, we lose $1 on a lost employee due to turnover. So, the cost to hire an employee is effectively DOUBLE what we think it is, just because we expect to lose half of them. So, with a turnover factor applied, a $100/employee/month expense is, in reality, a $200/employee/month expense with turnover factored into it.
Now I’d like to turn it over to LISA DOLAN, who will provide some in the field experience with hiring and retention
How do you recruit: Do you just look for bodies? A pulse?
A constant parade of different guards to a customer can cause service problems and significant unease that may trigger the cancellation of, or failure to renew, the contract. BUT, more importantly the domino effect among the ranks is low morale which creates unintended consequences- morale affects performance. It is a reflection of the company that tells the guard you don’t care- you are not invested in them. These disaffected security guards who likely have keys, pass codes, access to critical areas within the client firms then represent a serious security vulnerability. There is the direct cost to the company of continually having to replenish its work force.
You will have a competitive advantage over other security firms if you can keep minimize your turnover.
The strategies to reduce turnover will generally be divided into two categories: pre-employment and post employment.- I refer to this as Triage
Triage is the interview - Prepare the candidate with an honest and realistic outline of the job.
How do you preemptively eliminate candidates who are at a higher risk of not lasting.- weeding out (how did they dress for the interview, were they early, late, did they do more than just move their head up and down during the interview? Exchange in dialogue perhaps???)
Provide accurate information – pro and con about the site to all applicants.
When at all possible have site supervisor for site you are interviewing for present at interview (interaction important to see, they are more insightful due to being the boots on the ground, etc) Remember, front line management is the organization to the guard!
Compliance- Discuss importance of compliance and the role it plays in retention.
-training /retraining costs, etc to be discussed here
Incentives to retention- raises vs commendations, acknowledgement/certificate
Benefits (insurance, vacation etc)
What we’ve seen is that security guard firms are faced with challenges that contribute to their overall bottom line. Higher than average turnover forces organization to absorb costs in recruiting and onboarding. Competitive job markets are driving higher wage rates to ensure an acceptable retnetion rate. Yet with all these factors, turover rates still force Non billable overtime, driving into overall margins. As a result of this cascading effect, companies are turning towards other methods to help achieve efficiencies and streamline their operations. One of those is in technology adoption.
The Gated Community Nest Story -
One point of note is the idea of retail space. Over the last few years, we are seeing a growing trend of retail space going dark – closing their doors to respond to market pressure from online and big box retailers. As a result, this space is largely unguarded which contributes to the overall risk that is growing in security.
When you look at the overall impact technology has on the industry, you can look back before you look forward. Years ago, when the automobile was first introduced the number of cars to horse-drawn carriages was small…..for every 100 horse carriages, there was one car. This was in 1910. In 1920, the situation reversed itself; for 100 cars on the road there was 1 horse carriage.
The same is becoming true in other aspect of industry. Look at what the fast casual and fast food markets are doing. Whereas once you had cashiers to handle volume, technology has replaced this with self-service kiosks in retail, eliminating the need to have as many cashiers on staff. Now, with companies such as knightscope, you are seeing a trend towards robots covering a percentage of the guarding operations. While still years out, the technology is there and it is ever-present in the growth of technology and it’s impact on operations….will security guard become like the horse carriage? We hope not, but it’s a reality we need to deal with.
Looking at technology as a driver for many companies, we are seeing that the majority of guard firms have some level of software solution to help them manage their workforce. Of the respondants, around 70% state that they are using software solutions in their business. Digging deeper into the data, the majority of guard firms are using true software solutions for their operations:
Part of the attraction of software solution is that it provides a level of automation that eliminates manual entry, data errors, and gives companies a much better way to streamline operations and reduce costs. Another important aspect is usability. Companies want to adopt solutions that will drive value, and leverage a platform that is familiar to their end users. Of the firms that have adopted technology, 74% are using a mobility technology to augment operations.
One of the powerful aspects of mobile is the ability to drive further value to get real-time information on operations. By having these real-time operational aspects tracked, it’s a lot more beneficial to drive costs down, and manage schedules more effectively. Over here is a drill-down on how companies are leveraging mobile technology:
The majority of these mobile functions contribute to the ability to access real-time activities within the context of operations. This means being able to track the time worked, the activities within that time period, any incidents that might impact operations, and being able to gain visibility and control over those activities. Data from mobile helps to create a larger view into operational efficiency, and allows business to see any impact of these operations on costs and profit margins.
In this report, we’ve seen some interesting data points around the top challenges facing the security Guard industry. Perhaps the biggest of which could be considered a catalyst for many other challenges, and that is Turnover and Retention. If you look at the data, an overwhelming number of respondents see turnover as a major challenge to maintaining operations within their business. With an increasing competitive job market, many security firms are not only competing with their peers for resources, but also other industries, such as retail, for a share of the job market.
The challenge of turnover can impact the business from multiple facets. If an organization has limited resources, they may be forced to post guards that are over hours, which impacts non-billable overtime. In turn, incurring non-billable overtime will ultimate cut into margin and impact profitability. So one challenge bleeds into another.
<<<CLIENTS ARE STARTING TO CHART THEIR EMPLOYEES AVAILABILITY TO WORK – AND WHERE THEY ARE WORKING WHEN THEY ARE NOT AVAILABLE….PROVIDES DATA POINTS AS TO WHY THEY ARE WORKING ELSEWHERE >>>>
With turnover as a constant challenge, companies need to look to other ways to help streamline operations, reduce costs and maximize their margins. Most of this comes through technology adoption, specifically around solutions that combine both Web-based and mobile solutions. The primary focus for technology in alleviating operational constraints is to reduce the manual effort associated with maintain schedules, optimize scheduling to provide a better allocation of billable resources, all with the goal of offsetting additional costs to ensure margins are as optimal as possible.
With that being said, I’d like to turn it over for questions. Just before I do that I did want to take a moment to talk a little about Valiant. All the points we spoke of are able to be achieved using Valiant Solutions platform for workforce management. Valiant is purpose-built to provide you with the tools to manage and track your workforce, connect time and labor to billing and payroll, and eliminate manual processes while reducing risk.
We believe in reducing the risk associated with disparity, and that is why our integrated solution connects all aspects of your workforce operations to ensure compliance and accuracy. With over 25 years of experience in building solutions for the hourly workforce, Valiant Solutions is designed to give you visibility and control in time, labor, payroll and human resource management.
We believe that the combination of our industry-expertise, pedigree for the hourly workforce and our technology make us a true partner for driving value and success with our customers.
With that out of the way, I’d like to answer any questions you might have.