Presented by Doug Caroom - GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS BETWEENA ROCK (PROPERTY RIGHTS) AND A HARD PLACE (MANAGEMENT DEMANDS) - TWCA Annual Convention 2015
3. EAA v. Day
The property owner owns underground water in place, like
oil and gas
Depriving the owner of the right to produce can be a taking
of his property, entitling him to compensation
Domestic & Livestock exemption is not sufficient to protect
against taking
Subject to regulation – Penn Central takings analysis
Correlative Rights/”Fair Share” Doctrine – “As with oil and gas,
one purpose of groundwater regulation is to afford each owner of water
in a common, subsurface reservoir a fair share.”
4. EAA v. Bragg
EAA liable for taking under Penn Central analysis
Economic impact –
• Did not completely deprive owner of use of his property
• BUT – what about a purchaser who owns only groundwater
rights?
Reasonable investment backed expectations
Nature of the interest regulated/public interest.
Other Considerations (need more than rain to grow
pecans)
Currently on appeal to the Texas Supreme Court – not yet
accepted.
5. MANAGEMENT EXPECTATIONS
Groundwater Conservation Districts: “the State’s chosen
method of groundwater management,” subject to multiple obligations and
directions:
Legally obligated to implement DFC/MAG
But the GCDs set the DFCs
Preservation of Historic Uses -- § 36.116(b) “may preserve . . . to the
maximum extent practicable”
Responding to local constituents, e.g., Lost Pines GCD
Lots of local Press and Public Interest – e.g. American Statesman
coverage of Joe Beal or Electro Purification/Buda boycott