SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Does Sugar Make Kids 
Hyper? 
By: Deanna Moyer and Keeley Henry
Subjects/ experimental units 
● the population examined applies to all children 
who eat sugar 
● the subjects used in this experiment will be 200 
children from the ages of 5-12
Explanatory Variable 
The explanatory variable is if the children are 
given sugar or not.
Treatments Imposed 
Treatment 1- The kids receiving this treatment 
would be given a beverage with 10 teaspoons 
of sugar in it. 
Treatment B- The kids receiving this treatment 
would be given flavored water with no sugar.
Response Variable 
We would rate the level of hyperactivity in the 
children by using trained professionals to 
measure this by using a scale from 1 to 10. 
1 being very little hyperactivity and 10 being a 
lot of hyperactivity.
Experimental Design 
We would use a randomized blocked matched pairs experiment. 
We would select 50 boys between the ages of 5-12 and select 50 girls between 
the ages of 5-12. 
We would then put the 50 boys names in one hat and 50 girls names in another 
hat. Next we would draw 25 boys names from the hat and 25 girls names from 
the other hat. They will be called group A girls, and group A boys. The first 25 
boys and first 25 girls selected would receive the sugar beverage the first week. 
The 25 girls and 25 boys remaining would receive the flavored water with no 
sugar or the placebo drink. They will be called group b girls and group b boys 
The next week the 25 boys and 25 girls who already received the sugar 
treatment would receive the placebo drink 
The 25 boys and 25 girls who received the placebo drink the first week would 
then receive the sugar drink
Experimental design cont. 
100 boys 
and girls 
50 boys 
50 girls 
Group A Boys 
Group B Boys 
Sugar Drink 
Placebo Drink 
Group A Girls 
group B girls 
Sugar Drink 
Placebo Drink 
Randomization 
Group A Boys 
Placebo Drink 
Group B Boys Sugar Drink 
Hyperactivity ratings for 
each treatment for both 
groups 
Group A Girls 
Placebo Drink 
group B girls Sugar Drink 
First Week Second Week 
Hyperactivity ratings for 
each treatment for both 
groups
Blocking 
Blocking was used by separating the boys from 
the girls before we randomized the treatments. 
We did this because there is a possibility that 
boys and girls level of hyperactivity may vary 
due to their gender.
Blinding 
In this experiment double blinding is used. 
First we will blind the children by not letting them know 
what treatment they have received, to reduce bias, in case 
they might subconsciously react to match their treatment. 
We will also blind the evaluators as well by not telling them 
what treatment the children are receiving,to also reduce 
bias. We blinded them since they might make their ratings 
of the childrens hyperactiveness based on what treatment 
the child received.
Concerns 
The concerns in this experiment is that there is 
lurking and confounding variables that make 
skew the results. 
Such as if the child has adhd or if they have 
had sugar before they went in for observation.
Experimental Design Principles 
Control- In our design we have control groups. During week one group b boys and group b girls receive 
the placebo, and they are the controlled. 
In week 2 group a boys and group b girls receive the placebo so they are the controlled. 
Randomization-There is also randomization. We use randomization after we block. We do this 
by putting the girls names in one hat and the boys names in the other hat and shake them both. Then we select 25 
names from each hat. This is completely random because every boy and girl have the same chance of being picked in 
the first 25. 
Replication-This experiment can easily be replicated with a different set of 100 kids. It is also a must 
to make sure our findings is backed up by multiple other experiments so we can claim that the results are statistically 
significant.

More Related Content

Similar to Group dd

JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docx
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docxJOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docx
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docxcroysierkathey
 
Food Additives And Child Hyperactivity
Food Additives And Child HyperactivityFood Additives And Child Hyperactivity
Food Additives And Child HyperactivityAndrewRosenthal
 
Lesson 12 observational learning
Lesson 12   observational learningLesson 12   observational learning
Lesson 12 observational learningcoburgpsych
 
Baby Alvey Guesstimate
Baby Alvey GuesstimateBaby Alvey Guesstimate
Baby Alvey GuesstimateMcKey Sullivan
 
4presentation .ppt
4presentation .ppt4presentation .ppt
4presentation .pptAnwaar Ahmed
 
1.2 -behavourist
1.2  -behavourist1.2  -behavourist
1.2 -behavouristKerry Allen
 
1.2 -behavourist_operant_sc
1.2  -behavourist_operant_sc1.2  -behavourist_operant_sc
1.2 -behavourist_operant_scKerry Allen
 
Attachment psychology
Attachment psychologyAttachment psychology
Attachment psychologybethieboo8
 
Psychology unit 2 (learning approach
Psychology   unit 2 (learning approachPsychology   unit 2 (learning approach
Psychology unit 2 (learning approachjoe_hair
 
Devry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan new
Devry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan newDevry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan new
Devry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan newolivergeorg
 

Similar to Group dd (20)

Group L
Group LGroup L
Group L
 
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docx
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docxJOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docx
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSISSETTING GENERALITY AND.docx
 
Food Additives And Child Hyperactivity
Food Additives And Child HyperactivityFood Additives And Child Hyperactivity
Food Additives And Child Hyperactivity
 
Group h
Group hGroup h
Group h
 
Group jj
Group jjGroup jj
Group jj
 
Lesson 12 observational learning
Lesson 12   observational learningLesson 12   observational learning
Lesson 12 observational learning
 
Team18
Team18Team18
Team18
 
Group k
Group kGroup k
Group k
 
Baby Alvey Guesstimate
Baby Alvey GuesstimateBaby Alvey Guesstimate
Baby Alvey Guesstimate
 
RUTF.pptx
RUTF.pptxRUTF.pptx
RUTF.pptx
 
4presentation .ppt
4presentation .ppt4presentation .ppt
4presentation .ppt
 
Research design
Research designResearch design
Research design
 
1.2 -behavourist
1.2  -behavourist1.2  -behavourist
1.2 -behavourist
 
1.2 -behavourist_operant_sc
1.2  -behavourist_operant_sc1.2  -behavourist_operant_sc
1.2 -behavourist_operant_sc
 
Attachment psychology
Attachment psychologyAttachment psychology
Attachment psychology
 
Group aa
Group aaGroup aa
Group aa
 
Psychology unit 2 (learning approach
Psychology   unit 2 (learning approachPsychology   unit 2 (learning approach
Psychology unit 2 (learning approach
 
Team25
Team25Team25
Team25
 
Health Project
Health ProjectHealth Project
Health Project
 
Devry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan new
Devry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan newDevry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan new
Devry psyc 110 week 1 chapter 1 study plan new
 

More from texasexe

More from texasexe (20)

Bts night (cp p robstat)
Bts night (cp p robstat)Bts night (cp p robstat)
Bts night (cp p robstat)
 
Ap stats bts(2nd semester)
Ap stats bts(2nd semester)Ap stats bts(2nd semester)
Ap stats bts(2nd semester)
 
Bts night CALC
Bts night CALCBts night CALC
Bts night CALC
 
Group c
Group cGroup c
Group c
 
Grou qq
Grou qqGrou qq
Grou qq
 
Group n
Group nGroup n
Group n
 
Group q
Group qGroup q
Group q
 
Group pp
Group ppGroup pp
Group pp
 
Group p
Group pGroup p
Group p
 
Group oo
Group ooGroup oo
Group oo
 
Group o
Group oGroup o
Group o
 
Group nn
Group nnGroup nn
Group nn
 
Group mm
Group mmGroup mm
Group mm
 
Group m
Group mGroup m
Group m
 
Group ll
Group llGroup ll
Group ll
 
Group kk
Group kkGroup kk
Group kk
 
Group j
Group jGroup j
Group j
 
Group ii
Group iiGroup ii
Group ii
 
Group i
Group iGroup i
Group i
 
Group hh
Group hhGroup hh
Group hh
 

Group dd

  • 1. Does Sugar Make Kids Hyper? By: Deanna Moyer and Keeley Henry
  • 2. Subjects/ experimental units ● the population examined applies to all children who eat sugar ● the subjects used in this experiment will be 200 children from the ages of 5-12
  • 3. Explanatory Variable The explanatory variable is if the children are given sugar or not.
  • 4. Treatments Imposed Treatment 1- The kids receiving this treatment would be given a beverage with 10 teaspoons of sugar in it. Treatment B- The kids receiving this treatment would be given flavored water with no sugar.
  • 5. Response Variable We would rate the level of hyperactivity in the children by using trained professionals to measure this by using a scale from 1 to 10. 1 being very little hyperactivity and 10 being a lot of hyperactivity.
  • 6. Experimental Design We would use a randomized blocked matched pairs experiment. We would select 50 boys between the ages of 5-12 and select 50 girls between the ages of 5-12. We would then put the 50 boys names in one hat and 50 girls names in another hat. Next we would draw 25 boys names from the hat and 25 girls names from the other hat. They will be called group A girls, and group A boys. The first 25 boys and first 25 girls selected would receive the sugar beverage the first week. The 25 girls and 25 boys remaining would receive the flavored water with no sugar or the placebo drink. They will be called group b girls and group b boys The next week the 25 boys and 25 girls who already received the sugar treatment would receive the placebo drink The 25 boys and 25 girls who received the placebo drink the first week would then receive the sugar drink
  • 7. Experimental design cont. 100 boys and girls 50 boys 50 girls Group A Boys Group B Boys Sugar Drink Placebo Drink Group A Girls group B girls Sugar Drink Placebo Drink Randomization Group A Boys Placebo Drink Group B Boys Sugar Drink Hyperactivity ratings for each treatment for both groups Group A Girls Placebo Drink group B girls Sugar Drink First Week Second Week Hyperactivity ratings for each treatment for both groups
  • 8. Blocking Blocking was used by separating the boys from the girls before we randomized the treatments. We did this because there is a possibility that boys and girls level of hyperactivity may vary due to their gender.
  • 9. Blinding In this experiment double blinding is used. First we will blind the children by not letting them know what treatment they have received, to reduce bias, in case they might subconsciously react to match their treatment. We will also blind the evaluators as well by not telling them what treatment the children are receiving,to also reduce bias. We blinded them since they might make their ratings of the childrens hyperactiveness based on what treatment the child received.
  • 10. Concerns The concerns in this experiment is that there is lurking and confounding variables that make skew the results. Such as if the child has adhd or if they have had sugar before they went in for observation.
  • 11. Experimental Design Principles Control- In our design we have control groups. During week one group b boys and group b girls receive the placebo, and they are the controlled. In week 2 group a boys and group b girls receive the placebo so they are the controlled. Randomization-There is also randomization. We use randomization after we block. We do this by putting the girls names in one hat and the boys names in the other hat and shake them both. Then we select 25 names from each hat. This is completely random because every boy and girl have the same chance of being picked in the first 25. Replication-This experiment can easily be replicated with a different set of 100 kids. It is also a must to make sure our findings is backed up by multiple other experiments so we can claim that the results are statistically significant.