Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty

Argumentative Essay On Death Penalty
Maddison Higdon
Mrs. Gallos
English 3
21 November 2017
The Death Penalty
From 1973 to mid 2017, the death penalty has been used over 1,400. This highly opinionated topic
has been intensely debated among the country's top scholars.
Justice along with closure, is a large argument that most people bring up while debating this topic.
"But the only reason Belinda Crites needs to support the death penalty is 'what Eric Nance did to my
cousin.'" (Santhanam). The argument of whether families of the victim get closure or not is entirely
based on opinions. Though most people say that it is more revenge than justice, many families
believe that with the proper execution of the criminal, it sets their mind at ease. "The verdict,
undoubtedly a...show more content...
Georgia. Gregg was charged with armed robbery and murder, he plead that his sentence to death
was cruel and unusual. The judges ruled that it was neither cruel nor unusual punishment. With
this man's death people now understood that he would no longer cause any harm to the
community or to others around him. "'Two men convicted of killing two police officers in
Hattiesburg, MS will not do any more killing. That's for sure.'"(Should the Death). Along with
many other cases the criminal's career was ended. And in the long run, made society a better
place for people to live.If a person had a problem with something bad in their life, they would
most likely eliminate it. Much like criminals, the court system made it a rule to euthanize people
whose crimes are too radical to be rehabilitated. The court cost are high in the death penalty cases,
due to the fact that they are not a common occurrence. If it was used more often, the court time
would be cut down and it would be less money. The process of euthanizing a criminal is only
around $100, though now with costs of court time it can be over a million dollars per case. Ending
a criminal's life is a permanent end to their crimes and burden on society. Overcrowded prisons are
more of a concern for the prisoners than the death penalty.
Each day more and more people are poorly cared for and are starving in our state prisons due to
overpopulation."Prison overcrowding is one of the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Courtney Smith
AP Seminar
Period 3
Diana Frye
5 January 2017
Should the death penalty be legal?
Economic Rough Draft The death penalty slowly rids the world of killers – or those worthy of being
sent to death for their crime – but it takes a great deal of time and money to do so. Due to the
unnecessarily expensive capital cases, the cost efficient availability of keeping these inmates in jail
for life without parole, and the high price to execute prisoners on Death Row, the death penalty
should be illegal. Capital cases are much more expensive and time consuming than other criminal
cases. An analysis prepared by the Legislative Services Agency for the General Assembly found the
average cost for a murder case tried before a jury with the...show more content...
Web. 15 Dec. 2016. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/costs–death–penalty Dieter, Richard C.
"Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the
Death Penalty." Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say About the High Costs of the Death
Penalty | Death Penalty Information Center. Death Penalty Information
Center, Oct. 1922. Web. 16 Dec. 2016. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/millions
–misspent "Does the
Death Penalty Cost Less Than Life in Prison without Parole? – Death Penalty –
ProCon.org." ProConorg Headlines. N.p., 9 Aug. 2012. Web. 19 Dec. 2016. http:/
/deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001000 Gale. "Statistics: Death Sentences,
Capital Case Costs, And Executions." Capital Punishment:
Cruel and Unusual? Encyclopedia.com, 2008. Web. 15 Dec. 2016. http://www.encyclopedia.com
/law/legal–and–political–magazines/statistics–death–sentences–capital–case–costs–and–executions
Hennessy–Fiske, Molly. "Death Penalty: Cost of Execution Drugs –– and Executions –– Rises."
Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 24 Feb. 2012. Web. 15 Dec. 2016.

Argumentative Essay On The Death Penalty
Capital punishment is commonly known as the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty is killing someone
as a punishment for a crime through legal terms. In 2014, six hundred thirty–four people that are 18
years and older out of one thousand seventeen people were in favor of the death penalty (Gallup).
We use this punishment to serve justice for the life of the victim that has been taken. I am in favor
of the death penalty and it should be issued in all states for people who commit heinous crimes. The
death penalty is constitutional in that it does not violate the Eighth Amendment and an eye for an
eye should be deserved.
The Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is not a violation of the 8th Amendment. Criminals
do not want to face the...show more content...
Irwin Isenberg said, "when you kill a man with premeditation, you do something different than
stealing from him." You are taking away a person's life and acts of premeditation must be punished
by death. An assailant has the power of the judicial process who protects their constitutional rights
when they have been incarcerated and charged. Does anyone stop and think about the victim? The
officers, family, and friends may have compassion towards the assailant. The criminals lawyer helps
them gain publicity and usually turns the criminal into a victim, making them plead not guilty in the
eyes of the jury; knowing otherwise that they are guilty. Criminals must not get away with murder
and their best punishment should be the death penalty. George W. Bush said, "...capital punishment
is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives." Punishing murderers is the
only way to discourage future people into committing murder to save lives. Justice should be served
for the victims' death in that the murderer should die too. This punishment is reserved for the most
heinous murders; murderers who do not get the death penalty and are released from prison and will
most likely kill again; these people deserve to be punished by death.
It has been argued that the death penalty is inhumane and that it should be abolished because of it
being cruel and unusual. Life in prison is punishment enough, some would say. Minors and people
who suffer from

The Death Penalty In The American Justice System
Argument Essay: Death Penalty
The American Justice System has been using the death penalty, also known as capital punishment, as
a way to serve a prisoner's sentence usually due to the crime of murder. The death penalty in the
American Justice System has been used for many years now. Although in 18 states the death penalty
has already been abolished, there are still 32 states where it is still legal. The death penalty should
not be legal in the American Justice System, because it is immoral, unjust, and ineffective.
When something is immoral it usually means that it is unacceptable in our social or ethical
principles. Not only do we go against murder, but also there are some people who say this and are
for the death penalty and want the...show more content...
A capital punishment is something that cannot be undone and is irreversible.
Fig. 1. Innocent people released from death row.
In the case of Cameron Todd Willingham we are able to see how unfair and unjust Cameron was
executed for murders he did not commit. The case of Cameron had many questionable evidence that
was not investigated further and because of these mistake, Cameron Willingham was sentenced with
the death penalty and executed. The death penalty is also lacks proper justice because it denies
prisoners rehab. Many of the crimes committed were due to the influence of drugs and alcohol.
According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD), 50% of jail and
prison inmates are clinically addicted to either drugs, alcohol, or even both. This study shows that
since they are clinically addicted it could also mean that they could have been using the substance
while committing the crime. We should not be putting people on the death penalty if they were
unable to make rational decisions due to their addiction to drugs or alcohol. Mentally ill people are
also affected with the death penalty and there are cases where a person was executed and had a
mental disability. It is wrong to sentence someone to the capital punishment knowing that they were
unable to make correct decisions due to their state of health. We should be able to provide the help

My initial thoughts on the death penalty were that no matter how much the death penalty deters
crime, it is still a cruel punishment. I always assumed that the death penalty violated our eighth
amendment, so why in this day and age is it still deemed as a penalty for a crime? It is widely
known that the use of the death penalty is an extremely serious and permanent punishment.
However, the government had already found its way to justify it by creating the fifth amendment
which allows someone to be executed as long as there is due process of law. The bill of rights was
written centuries ago in a time when execution was deemed necessary for a majority of crimes.
The death penalty, also commonly referred to as capital punishment, can be sentenced to anyone that
has been convicted of murder or a capital crime. In the eighteenth century, more than two hundred
crimes were deemed punishable by death because everyone had this idea of retribution but to the
worst extent. Currently there are nineteen states that have abolished the death penalty in the United
States; while execution still remains an option for thirty–one states. In the United States, it is
acknowledged that the system is flawed and sometimes unjust resulting in many states abolishing the
death penalty. Why do the remaining states want to keep the punishment around?
Before I completely sided with one viewpoint of this argument I wanted to do some research. After
searching for articles on Opposing Viewpoints that

The Death Penalty has a powerful meaning to it; it's not just a punishment for those criminals who
commit a horrific crime. The Death Penalty offers the execution, gas chamber, lethal injection,
hanging, and firing squad. The capital punishment is a topic that can cause arguments because some
say it helps and some say it cannot help in anyway. The death penalty has saved lives after an
execution, but it has caused many issues for families.
The Death Penalty was established "far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King
Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes" ("History"). It
was also apart of the "Fourteen Century B.C.'s Hittite Code, in the Seventh Century B.C.'s Draconian
Code of Athens, which made death the only punishment for all crimes; and in the Fifth Century
B.C.'s Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets" ("History"). The Death Penalty was carried out if it was
drowning, crucifixion, burning while being alive, impalement, and beating to death. As the time
went on by the Eighteen Century A.D. a man named William the Conqueror would not allow people
to be hung unless it was a murder case. As the years carried on in 1608 Caption George Kendall
was the first man who got executed while being record in his colony. Jane Champion was the first
woman who got executed in her colony in 1632. The Death Penalty all started and it did minimize
crimes stated in the early 1800.
Furthermore, the Death Penalty is only an execution for

Olivier Benoit
Professor Marlene Lang
English 101
6 November 2017
Death Penalty The death penalty is a heavily debated topic and will be for many years to come. One
of the debated topics of capital punishment is whether it actually deters crimes effectively and is
better than life in prison with no chance at parole. Some studies had shown that the death penalty
actually saves between three and 18 lives when each convicted killer is executed.(Tanner, 2007)
Naci Mocan, an economics professor, proves the studies by re–examining data from a previous
study. Through re–examining the data, Mocat finds that "each execution results in five fewer
homicides, and commuting a death sentence means five more homicides."(Tanner, 2007) This
means that by executing the life of a convicted killer, five lives could potentially be saved. Roy
Adler and Michael Summers published a study on this subject. The authors examined U.S.
homicides and executions from 1979 to 2004, and observed that the homicides decreased while
executions increased (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). The Emory studies had also established that the
capital punishment reduces the number of murders. The first study from the Emory group had
concluded that each execution leads to eighteen fewer murders (Tanner, 2007). The second study
used monthly murder and execution data from 1977 to 1999 and concluded that each death
sentence led to 4.5 fewer murders and each execution resulted in three fewer murders (Radelet and
Lacock, 2009). Through this study, it was found that executions had the greatest effect on murders
of passion and those between friends and families, compared to murders between strangers. It was
also found that shorter stays on death row led to one fewer murder for every 2.75 fewer years that
a convict remains on death row before execution (Radelet and Lacock, 2009). The third study states
that "91% of the states had higher homicide rates after they suspended the death penalty. Conversely,
70% of the states saw homicides decrease after the death penalty was reinstated" (Radelet and
Lacock, 2009). The final study had found that "In the states that executed fewer than nine prisoners,
there was either no deterrent effect or else the homicide rate actually

The death penalty, death as a consequence given by law due to the committing of a serious crime.
The death penalty is given to those who commit serious crimes such as treason, terrorism, drug
trafficking, and murder. The death penalty is a horrific consequence that has an abundance of
improving to do for the sake of everyone. If the death penalty system isn't changed soon more
innocent people will continue to die due to the mistake of the court. A death penalty is a form of
execution for those who have committed serious crimes, the effect of this all is obviously death,
as well as an extreme cost of money and innocent people's life at risk. The world without the death
penalty is an improved world, no revenge, no hatred, no waste of money and most importantly no
more court organized deaths. For example, improving the death penalty will decrease what
taxpayers pay for it, and decrease botched executions. It provides a safer world for everyone.
Second chances are often given to many people, it wouldn't be a bad idea to give those who have
committed a serious crime a second chance. Allowing them to have a second chance will open their
minds to the idea of bettering for both the world and themselves. The opposing side would believe
that they don't deserve a second chance because what they have done is unforgivable. However,
there are companies that do believe in second chances for felonies; Companies such as, AT&T,
In–N–Out, Ikea and IHOP support hiring felons. Although

Write an argumentative essay in which you convince an audience to support your claim about a
debatable idea. Use your research and experience to support your argument.
Psst, copy and paste your CBA here. Look at the checklist on pg. 156 in your SpringBoard to help
you out.
The Death Penalty is very debatable I however am against it because of its cost to America and
undeserving families I'm also against it because of how people think it deters murder when it does
not.The last part of the fifth amendment states that "No person shall be held for capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,Nor be deprived of life
liberty or property." meaning that no matter what we do our government should not decide when
our life is being taken away. Innocent people sit in jail on death row for most of their lives just to
find out that it was a mistake, what happens when the wrong person get killed will the government
have the same consequences for killing an innocent person?
The death penalty is not good for the non deterrence. People will always cover up the death
penalty by saying it is stopping people from committing crimes obviously it isn't. Wouldn't you
think that if it really did deter crime people would eventually stop committing the crime. In my
opinion if the death penalty isn't going to deter crime then why should we have it. It's not going to
make a difference on whether people kill or not. In Other words if you are a killer

Every year over thousands of people die from the brutal and highest of all punishments, the capital
punishment or more known as the "Death Penalty". Countries such as China, The United States, and
even Saudi Arabia still enforces this cruel punishment. But is it really worth it? Today I will try to
convince you on why this is an inhumane punishment should cease to exist. What do you think of
the death punishment?
There were many examples which the death penalty appeared in history. For example, during the
medieval and early ages of Europe, before the appearance of modern prison systems the death
punishment was generally known as an appropriate punishment for every crime. As many as 72,000
people were executed for the reign of Henry the 8th during 21st of April 1509 to 28th of January
1547. Coming...show more content...
Over the years, the catholic church has slowly mentioned the approval of the death penalty, and
developed a disapproving stance towards it. The modern church figures, such as Pope Francis, Pope
John Paul The Second discourages these penalties, telling people to outright abolish them. There is
also Buddhism, which states that "do not kill or cause to kill". Hinduism which allows, and forbids
the death penalty. Judaism however does allows the death penalty, scholars of Judaism forbids the
death penalty penalty in the modern world. Islam although allowed, states the every person has the
right to live. As you can see, many religious although allows it. Still disagrees with it. Over the years
many abolitionists, such as " Amnesty International" with over 7 million members, which states that
the death penalty is the " ultimate, and irreversible denial of human rights". So this is the many
reasons which is why the death penalty should never exist. I hope you enjoyed my speech, and do
you agree with the death

Cruelty of Death Penalty There are many controversial topics in this country's politics and
criminal justice system. These topics range from mass incarceration to racial profiling to three
strikes and to the death penalty. The death penalty for many years has been a topic in which many
cannot come to a consensus on, both in the state and the federal level. Although both sides to the
death penalty argument have legitimate reasons, it is now seen that the death penalty is becoming
less and less famous. It seems as if despite its vengeance for blood thirsty people, the death penalty
has no positive effect. Death penalty should be abolished because it puts innocent lives in danger,
it is expensive, and life without parole is better. The death penalty puts innocent lives in danger.
Rarely, innocent people have been put on the death row for a homicide. Studies show that as of
October 2015, the U.S. have executed over 1,414 individuals since 1976. 156 individuals have been
exonerated from death row––that is, found to be innocent and released – since 1973 (Innocence
Database). In other words, 1.1 in 10 prisoners in the death row are innocent. Some of them get
reimbursed by suing the state government for putting their lives in danger, for wasting their time,
and disrupt their families. Then again, if these people were executed before appeal, it is
irreversible, and there is no way to reimburse their lives. For example, Carlos De Luna, a man found
near a crime scene where a gas

Vishaldeep 1
Vishaldeep Singh
Instructor Michal Latala
English 103
15 June 2017
Sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own
understanding. The death penalty is something that many people do not have a clear decision on.
Many people support the death penalty, while others wish for the death penalty to be abolished, and
there are some that support the death penalty, but only in certain cases. My personal opinion on the
death penalty is, it should be administered only in cases of particularly cruel crimes, or serial crimes
such as serial murder. Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments.
The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance that there might be an error is
separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur,
and an innocent person is put to death, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death
penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a
possibility of injury or death. Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of
accidental death, even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. These activities continue
to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a
society, that the advantages outweigh the unplanned loss. We have also decided that the advantages
of having dangerous murderers removed from our society surpass the losses of the offender.
The second argument against capital punishment is that it is unfair in its administration. Statistics
show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. Once again, this is a
separate issue. The rich are more likely to get off with a lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong.
However, this is yet another problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not
a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the courts and their unfair
system of sentencing.
The third argument is actually a reply to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. The
claim is that the

The death penalty is a controversial topic that most people believe to be a good thing.I am against
the death penalty, not only is it a waste of taxpayers money, a crime, and a sin, it also could be
considered cruel and unusual punishment. How would you feel if the person you love was
sentenced to the death penalty? Your viewpoint of the death penalty may certainly change
considering it's a love one's life at stake. Would your feelings about the death penalty change?
An excessive amount of money is involved in the death penalty. "An Urban Institute study of
Maryland's experience with the death penalty found that a single death–penalty trial cost $1.9
million more than a non–death–penalty trial. Since 1978, the cost to taxpayers for the five
executions the state carried out was $37.2 million dollars – each." "The Cost of the Death Penalty."
The Cost of Death Penalty, 9 Dec. 2011, deathpenaltyfacts.wordpress.com
/the–cost–of–the–death–penalty–3/. Why spend extreme amounts of money only to end another's
life? "In California, the current system costs $137 million per year; it would cost $11.5 million for a
system without the death penalty.""Death Penalty Cost – Amnesty International USA." Amnesty
International USA, www.amnestyusa.org/issues/death–penalty/death–penalty–facts
/death–penalty–cost/. I understand the want to give victims families justice, but in reality, justice
isn't served. Consider the crime one committed was murder, the person who has committed that
crime also has to lose their life, doesn't that mean there are now two murders? Now the person in
charge of these executions is just as wrong as the person who committed the crime. Two wrongs
don't make a situation right. There no need to continue the death penalty. Who makes the decision
to take a criminal's life? They may have done a bad crime to get them in the predicament they're in,
but it's not okay for another human being(judge) to decide when someone should be sentenced to
death. It could at the least be decided by multiple individuals, that one judge may have a bias
feeling towards the criminal, or the judge may be prejudice towards different races, there are too
many factors against why this important decision should not be made by one person.

Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the execution of an offender that is sentenced to death
by a court of law for a criminal offense. This type of punishment for inmates is involved in
controversy over whether or not it is an acceptable form of punishment for criminals and also
whether or not it is immoral. There are many arguments for both sides of the debate, each making
valid points and pointing out the flaws of the opposing position. Many religions are either for or
against capital punishment, due to them either being against killing or for it. The controversy
surrounding the death penalty laws in the United States is made up of various arguments. Other
arguments surrounding the use of the death penalty include whether...show more content...
The constitution guarantees the due process of law and equal protection under the law. Supporters
of the death penalty also believe that it is an intolerable act of denial of civil liberties and that it is
not consistent with the values that are upheld by our democratic system. Those that support capitol
punishment claim that it has an effect on potentially violent criminals where as the threat of
imprisonment for life is not sufficient, while those against capitol punishment have shown research
that has stated that it is not more effect at deterring criminal motives then a life–long prison
sentence. The people who support capital punishment believe that it is possible to only have the
people that are truly deserving of the death are executed by having laws and procedures fashioned in
that way. They state that the capital punishment in the United States argue that the death penalty is a
very humane way of punishing those who have taken another life and are brutal killers. Those who
support it believes that it a constitutional way of punishing the criminals and deterring violent
crimes. The United States is the only English–speaking Western democracy in which the death
penalty is still in use. Capitol Punishment was reinstated by the U.S. Supreme Court after a
four–year moratorium in 1976. Religion also plays a role in the case of the death penalty. The
American

The death Penalty is a very controversial topic to many. Some believe that the death penalty should
not only be in place but there should be more executions every year. While others believe that the
death penalty is going out of style and it is not serving its purpose of deterring crime as it did
before. Although there are many claims supporting both sides still over half of Americans are for
capital punishment in some way, but what causes someone to be sentenced to death? According to
the article "Against the American System of Capital Punishment" by Jack Greenberg the worst crime
is, "a putative killer of one's parent or child" (Greenberg). What makes this the worst crime? And out
of the few executions are these the only people getting...show more content...
According to this article "How the Death Penalty Saves Lives" by David B, Muhlhausen the death
death penalty is more widely agreed upon that it should be in place than it shouldn't. The author
makes the argument that with the death penalty in place it deters the crimes that have this
punishment from happening. He also argues about how the constitution plays a role but how it
supports it. He claims that it uphold constitutional protections such as due process and equal
protection of law. Muhlhausen believes the death penalty should be in place simply because there
are more Americans for it than against it. He believes that this should be in place because it is what
America wants and the constitution supports it through the constitutional protections of due process,
and equal protection of law.Muhlhausen has many main points similar to Greenberg but
Muhlhausen doesn't have as much evidence or support to back up all of his arguments. He has
some strong points but it could be supported better. Between Jack Greenberg's, "Against the
American System of Capital Punishment" and David B. Muhlhausen, "How the Death Penalty
Saves Lives" the points they are arguing tend to be fairly similar. They both argue whether the
death penalty is a good or bad deter for the "worst crime," which is claimed to be killing that
person's parents or children. Another similar point they have

Cruelty of Death Penalty
There are many controversial topics in this country's politics and criminal justice system. These
topics range from mass incarceration to racial profiling to three strikes and to the death penalty.
The death penalty for many years has been a topic in which many cannot come to a consensus on,
both in the state and the federal level. Although both sides to the death penalty argument have
legitimate reasons, it is now seen that the death penalty is becoming less and less famous. It
seems as if despite its vengeance for blood thirsty people, the death penalty has no positive effect.
Death penalty should be abolished because it puts innocent lives in danger, it is expensive, and life
without parole is better. The death penalty puts innocent lives in danger. Rarely, innocent people
have been put on the death row for a homicide. Studies show that as of October 2015, the U.S. have
executed over 1,414 individuals since 1976. 156 individuals have been exonerated from death
row––that is, found to be innocent and released – since 1973 (Innocence Database). In other words,
1.1 in 10 prisoners in the death row are innocent. Some of them get reimbursed by suing the state
government for putting their lives in danger, for wasting their time, and disrupt their families. Then
again, if these people were executed before appeal, it is irreversible, and there is no way to
reimburse their lives. For example, Carlos De Luna, a man found near a crime scene where a gas

Argument Against the Death Penalty Essay
Argument Against the Death Penalty
Life is sacred. This is an ideal that the majority of people can agree upon to a certain extent. For this
reason taking the life of another has always been considered the most deplorable of crimes, one
worthy of the harshest available punishment. Thus arises one of the great moral dilemmas of our
time. Should taking the life of one who has taken the life of others be considered an available
punishment? Is a murderer's life any less sacred than the victim's is? Can capital punishment, the
death penalty, execution, legal murder, or whatever a societywishes to call it, be morally justifiable?
The underlying question in this issue is if any kind of killing, regardless of reason, can be accepted.
In this...show more content...
Today our society is assaulted with a barrage of violent images, whether fictional or not. People no
longer think twice when they see a character die in a movie or a bullet riddled high–schooler jump
out of a second story window. The concept of human life has completely lost its meaning. Capital
punishment contributes to this problem. A convict is not thought of as a person. All humanity
associated with them is removed. This rationalization is required in order have a society where
capital punishment is legal. If a society removes humanity from convicts, characters in movies, or
people on the 6 o'clock news it will begin to remove humanity from people encountered in every day
life.
With time violence may become such a commonplace that even seemingly sane people will see no
problem murdering a store clerk, opening fire on someone that cut them off on the highway, or
killing a disobedient child. "A society that chooses violent death as a solution to a social problem
gives official sanction to a climate of violence." (Prejean, 57)
The next argument supporting the immorality of capital punishment is that the reality of it is
hidden. The majority of Americans support the death penalty, yet a very small minority of them has
actually witnessed an execution. Also, very few Americans have known an executed criminal.
These two facts contribute to the entire rationalization process. No matter how anyone looks at it, no
one can deny the fact

Hanson Yang
Professor Littlefield
English 111
23 July 2017
Death Penalty
Every society has a set of laws that are used to maintain order within the society. Crime laws are
enforced to reduce crimes. If the laws were broken, people would receive consequences that are
equal to the magnitude of the crime. Although all sanctions should equal the crime, there is a
controversial method: the death penalty. Death punishment is a cruel fate even for a criminal who
had cause great harms. The death penalty has more negative impacts than benefits. It is an
ineffective method to punish someone for a crime because of its high percentage of error and the
high costs of performing such sanction. It is also an outdated practice that many countries have
...show more content...
However, some were unfortunate and their innocence was proven after they were executed.
An example of an unjustifiable execution is the death of Caryl Chessman. In 1948 in Los
Angeles, there was a series of robbery and rape conducted by the "Red Light Bandit". This
criminal drove a car with a red light that was similar to the sirens on police cars. The criminal used
this light to stop drivers and rob or rape them. Chessman became a suspect because he had a car
with a similar red light. He declared his innocence but was still taken into custody. The jury found
him guilty and he was sentenced to death. On May 2, 1960, as Chessman was being strapped into the
chair in the gas chamber at San Quentin, an attorney was in Sacramento, presenting a motion to the
Judge of the California Supreme Court. The presentation is about the "real" culprit, Charles
Terranova, who fit the description provided by victims of the "Red Light Bandit." The Judge tried to
call the Warden at San Quentin to halt the execution, but his secretary misdialed the number until it
was too late: the execution had already begun. And with that, Chessman was falsely accused of a
crime he did not committed and was sentenced to an unjustifiable death.
Nevertheless to say, the time and the effort that was placed into a case like Chessman's was a total
waste. The cost of death penalty is far more than other punishments because more

Capital punishment or death penalty is a form of punishment mostly used for people that murder
somebody. It is a very complex issue in today's world. There are very strong opinions on both
sides of the argument. Some believe that every state should have it, and others believe that none
should. It is so controversial because both sides believe that they are right and because death is so
permanent. If you make a mistake, once the death penalty is imposed, there is no taking it back.
Here are some of the views held by people about the death penalty.
Some people strongly believe that the death penalty should be imposed on, at the very least, every
murderer. Many believe that even lesser crimes warrant this punishment. They believe either that
...show more content...
Capital punishment deters crime by causing world be murderers to fear arrest and conviction and
by preventing convicted murderers from killing again. In recent years, violent crime in newyork
has dropped dramatically, due in part to the restitution of the death penalty.since I took office in
1995 violent crime has dropped 23 per cent,assautlts are down 22 per cent and murders have dropped
by nearly one–third. ... I believe this has occurred in part because of the strong signal that the death
and our other tough new laws have sent to violent criminals and murderers. You will be punished
with the full force of the law.
No:capital punishment actually makes the fight against crime more difficult. Executions waste
valuable resources that could be applied to more promising efforts to protect the public. Additionally
, innocent people are sometimes executed and the brutalizing effect executions have on society may
result in more murders. In 1994, 6100 criminals were sentenced to the state prison in manhattan
(New York) and 9000 more were sent to city jail. In 1975, when I became district attorney, there were
648 homicides inmanhattan; in 1994, there were 330. The number has been cut vitually in half
without executions_ proof to me that they are not needed to continue that trend. ( George E.Pataki
,1995

Death Penalty First and foremost, the death penalty is defined as the punishment of execution,
administered to someone who has committed a terrible crime (Capital Punishment 1). This is also
known as capital punishment, which is known for disregarding the human rights. Although many
countries continue to enforce the death penalty, some countries think it should not be practiced.
According to the United States, the death penalty continues to be a charged and controversial
political and legal issue(Capital Punishment 1). In addition to, the death penalty also focuses on if
the death penalty is fair not unfair; let alone, if the criminal will receive the right justice and
punishment for the crime he has brought onto himself. The death...show more content...
Adding to the chorus of those who raise questions about fairness are those who argue that the death
penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment for those who are severely ill or mentally
impaired (Preface to "Is the Death Penalty Applied Fairly?" 1).
The outcome of this is to find another way to find out if the death penalty is given to the right
individual who has committed the crime. There was a research done that would allow the person
who committed the crime to take a DNA test; however, this could fairly help find a way to
persecute the victim. The way that "advance technology" is set up today "it is now possible to
establish the presence of an individual at the scene of the crime" (Preface to "Is the Death Penalty
Applied Fairly?" 1). As a result, to some disagree that the DNA testing assist the fairness and justice
of the death penalty. The death penalty is a major issue that brings up a lot of arguments in this
society. The most important question is should the death penalty be abolished or not. I think the
death penalty is the ultimate contradiction for human rights. It is cruel, barbaric, and a disgraceful
punishment that can be given to humans. According to most people "it is a affront to human
dignity" which produces an ongoing cycle of violence that can determine the human life (Capital
Punishment Should be Abolished). However, many individuals believe that no matter a

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Writing Service

More from Custom Paper Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty