SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
DEPENDENCIA DE LAS IMPORTACIONES DE TRIGO
HUMBERTO CHUQUIMIA VARGAS
IMPORTANCIA DEL TRIGO, DESDE EL PUNTO DE
VISTA DEL CONSUMO
El trigo es uno de los alimentos de consumo diario de los bolivianos, que
ocupa el segundo lugar como proveedor de carbohidratos, después de la
papa, y por ello el interés desde hace varias décadas por tener políticas y
acciones que contribuyan a lograr una mayor autosuficiencia del mismo.
DEMANDA DE TRIGO
Años
Demanda
(Tm)
Variación
(%)
2010 559.157,32
2011 586.805,63 4,94
2012 540.926,35 -7,82
2013 448.163,17 -17,15
2014 546.302,39 21,90
2015 641.795,73 17,48
2016 807.576,47 25,83
2017 764.239,42 -5,37
2018 761.686,43 -0,33
Crecim. prom. Anual (%) 4,94
Crecim. Acumulado (%) 39,49
Fuente: Elaboración propia con basa a datos del INE, 2022
CONSUMO PERCAPITA DE TRIGO
Años
Consumo percápita
(Kg/año/persona)
Variación
(%)
2010 55,75
2011 57,57 3,26
2012 52,23 -9,28
2013 42,60 -18,44
2014 51,12 20,02
2015 59,15 15,69
2016 73,31 23,94
2017 68,35 -6,77
2018 67,13 -1,79
Crecim. prom. Anual (%) 3,33
Crecim. Acumulado (%) 26,64
Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE, 2022
FACTORES QUE INFLUYEN
Factores
que
influyen
Política de subvención al
consumidor
Tipo de cambio apreciado
Política arancelaria
Crecimiento poblacional
Incremento en el ingreso
disponible
CONSECUENCIAS
Consecuencias
Cambio en el hábito de los
consumidores
Estructura de consumo
dependiente de las
importaciones
Inseguridad alimentaria y
nutricional a mediano y
largo plazo
Ausencia de soberanía
alimentaria en Bolivia
LA PRODUCCION TRIGO
LA PARTICIPACION DEL TRIGO EN LA PRODUCCION DE CEREALES
Campañas agrícolas Cereales (Tm) Trigo (Tm) Participación (%)
2010-2011 1.969.567,00 239.270,00 12,1
2011-2012 2.229.608,00 132.657,00 5,9
2012-2013 2.273.072,00 186.023,00 8,2
2013-2014 2.449.393,00 159.670,00 6,5
2014-2015 2.934.920,00 337.599,00 11,5
2015-2016 2.660.494,00 329.437,00 12,4
2016-2017 2.279.134,00 154.435,00 6,8
2017-2018 3.267.425,00 301.689,00 9,2
Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE, 2022
POSICION DEL TRIGO EN LA PRODUCCION DEL GRUPO
CEREALES, EN EL CICLO AGRICOLA 2017 – 2018 (TM)
Arroz con cáscara 541.157
Avena 21.906
Cañahua 777
Cebada en grano 46.620
Centeno 275
Maíz en grano (1) 1.260.926
Quínua 70.763
Sorgo en grano (1) 1.023.314
Trigo (1) 301.689
Total 3.267.427
Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE, 2022
PRODUCCION DE TRIGO
Años Potosi Chuquisaca Tarija Cochabamba La Paz Total Occidente Santa Cruz Bolivia
1999-2000 13.092,00 6.510,00 787,00 14.412,00 1.078,00 35.879,00 41.550,00 77.977,00
2000-2001 13.340,00 7.080,00 768,00 14.373,00 1.089,00 36.650,00 56.640,00 93.823,00
2001-2002 13.625,00 6.590,00 808,00 12.709,00 1.106,00 34.838,00 61.000,00 96.391,00
2002-2003 13.954,00 6.791,00 845,00 12.917,00 1.055,00 35.562,00 53.600,00 89.728,00
2003-2004 14.224,00 7.440,00 817,00 13.282,00 1.026,00 36.789,00 39.460,00 76.775,00
2004-2005 14.769,00 7.864,00 913,00 12.363,00 1.057,00 36.966,00 57.563,00 95.038,00
2005-2006 15.368,00 8.060,00 863,00 12.587,00 1.084,00 37.962,00 81.933,00 120.399,00
2006-2007 15.878,00 7.895,00 906,00 12.597,00 1.094,00 38.370,00 104.260,00 143.126,00
2007-2008 16.277,00 8.564,00 943,00 14.064,00 1.115,00 40.963,00 103.889,00 145.360,00
2008-2009 12.338,00 9.358,00 981,00 15.647,00 1.101,00 39.425,00 142.985,00 182.901,00
2009-2010 13.858,00 9.563,00 934,00 14.768,00 1.073,00 40.196,00 194.087,00 234.784,00
2010-2011 13.597,00 9.207,00 913,00 15.345,00 1.063,00 40.125,00 198.622,00 239.270,00
2011-2012 13.256,00 10.442,00 1.005,00 14.518,00 1.073,00 40.294,00 91.829,00 132.657,00
2012-2013 13.650,00 10.628,00 1.178,00 15.932,00 1.131,00 42.519,00 142.962,00 186.023,00
2013-2014 14.214,00 10.886,00 1.096,00 18.189,00 1.249,00 45.634,00 113.460,00 159.670,00
2014-2015 14.375,00 11.908,00 1.022,00 18.378,00 1.400,00 47.083,00 289.884,00 337.599,00
2015-2016 19.982,00 15.903,00 1.404,00 25.280,00 1.883,00 64.452,00 264.121,00 329.437,00
2016-2017 17.286,00 21.326,00 887,00 22.213,00 1.508,00 63.220,00 90.516,00 154.435,00
2017-2018 18.756,00 27.468,00 1.673,00 27.600,00 1.649,00 77.146,00 223.817,00 301.689,00
PARTICIPACION EN LA PRODUCCION
Campañas Santa Cruz Occidente
1999-2000 53 46
2000-2001 60 39
2001-2002 63 36
2002-2003 60 40
2003-2004 51 48
2004-2005 61 39
2005-2006 68 32
2006-2007 73 27
2007-2008 71 28
2008-2009 78 22
2009-2010 83 17
2010-2011 83 17
2011-2012 69 30
2012-2013 77 23
2013-2014 71 29
2014-2015 86 14
2015-2016 80 20
2016-2017 59 41
2017-2018 74 26
SUPERFICIE CULTIVADA DE TRIGO
Años Potosí Chuquisaza Tarija Cochabamba La Paz Total Occidente Santa Cruz Bolivia
1999-2000 17.526,00 12.558,00 1.143,00 15.292,00 2.041,00 48.560,00 41.550,00 90.976,00
2000-2001 18.051,00 13.060,00 1.082,00 15.866,00 2.125,00 50.184,00 36.000,00 87.100,00
2001-2002 18.167,00 12.824,00 1.215,00 14.885,00 2.133,00 49.224,00 55.800,00 105.922,00
2002-2003 18.385,00 12.558,00 1.229,00 14.943,00 2.093,00 49.208,00 35.000,00 85.125,00
2003-2004 18.497,00 13.949,00 1.193,00 15.174,00 2.065,00 50.878,00 30.200,00 82.003,00
2004-2005 18.837,00 13.882,00 1.231,00 14.380,00 2.082,00 50.412,00 29.250,00 80.555,00
2005-2006 19.210,00 15.304,00 1.202,00 14.528,00 2.111,00 52.355,00 48.000,00 101.212,00
2006-2007 19.581,00 15.495,00 1.266,00 14.801,00 2.117,00 53.260,00 62.150,00 116.287,00
2007-2008 19.826,00 15.108,00 1.332,00 14.894,00 2.116,00 53.276,00 56.072,00 110.220,00
2008-2009 16.391,00 15.708,00 1.316,00 16.511,00 2.115,00 52.041,00 70.361,00 123.248,00
2009-2010 17.752,00 16.438,00 1.372,00 15.957,00 2.017,00 53.536,00 93.250,00 147.608,00
2010-2011 17.397,00 16.027,00 1.340,00 16.567,00 2.042,00 53.373,00 119.221,00 173.425,00
2011-2012 16.948,00 16.364,00 1.491,00 15.894,00 2.046,00 52.743,00 82.878,00 136.429,00
2012-2013 17.700,00 16.239,00 1.676,00 17.114,00 2.074,00 54.803,00 74.456,00 129.983,00
2013-2014 17.592,00 17.265,00 1.520,00 17.479,00 2.204,00 56.060,00 93.000,00 149.902,00
2014-2015 17.484,00 18.292,00 1.363,00 17.843,00 2.333,00 57.315,00 138.040,00 196.188,00
2015-2016 18.369,00 19.218,00 1.390,00 18.747,00 2.451,00 60.175,00 168.776,00 229.822,00
2016-2017 17.906,00 18.932,00 1.377,00 18.259,00 2.204,00 58.678,00 114.871,00 174.386,00
2017-2018 17.809,00 24.003,00 1.384,00 23.010,00 2.399,00 68.605,00 130.113,00 199.569,00
VARIACION SUPERF
-60.00
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
Bolivia Occidente Santa Cruz
PARTICIPACION EN LA SUPERFICIE TOTAL
Años Occidente Santa Cruz
1999-2000 53,38 45,67
2000-2001 57,62 41,33
2001-2002 46,47 52,68
2002-2003 57,81 41,12
2003-2004 62,04 36,83
2004-2005 62,58 36,31
2005-2006 51,73 47,43
2006-2007 45,80 53,45
2007-2008 48,34 50,87
2008-2009 42,22 57,09
2009-2010 36,27 63,17
2010-2011 30,78 68,74
2011-2012 38,66 60,75
2012-2013 42,16 57,28
2013-2014 37,40 62,04
2014-2015 29,21 70,36
2015-2016 26,18 73,44
2016-2017 33,65 65,87
2017-2018 34,38 65,20
RENDIM
Años Occidente Santa Cruz Bolivia
1999-2000 684,6 1000,0 857,0
2000-2001 682,0 1573,0 1077,0
2001-2002 660,4 1093,0 910,0
2002-2003 671,0 1531,0 1054,0
2003-2004 671,8 1307,0 936,0
2004-2005 692,0 1968,0 1180,0
2005-2006 684,8 1707,0 1190,0
2006-2007 680,8 1678,0 1231,0
2007-2008 713,4 1853,0 1319,0
2008-2009 712,4 2032,0 1484,0
2009-2010 700,2 2081,0 1591,0
2010-2011 696,6 1666,0 1380,0
2011-2012 706,4 1108,0 972,0
2012-2013 720,8 1920,0 1431,0
2013-2014 753,6 1220,0 1065,0
2014-2015 770,6 2100,0 1721,0
2015-2016 1008,4 1565,0 1433,0
2016-2017 858,8 788,0 886,0
2017-2018 979,6 1720,0 1512,0
Promedio 742,4 1606,1 1242,9
VARIACION DEL RENDIMIENTO (%)
-60.00
-40.00
-20.00
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
Bolivia Occidente Santa Cruz
PRODUCTIVIDAD APARENTE DEL TRABAJO
Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE
Años
Productividad del trabajo
(TM/trab)
Tierra trabajadas por trabajador
(Has/trab)
Santa Cruz Occidente Santa Cruz Occidente
2005 58 1,7 11,25 0,48
2015 76 2,03 14,57 0,61
INDICADORES PRODUCTIVOS TRIGO
Países
Superf promedio
cultivada (Has/Flia)
Producc
prom
(Ton/flia)
Costo
producción
($us/Ha)
Rendimiento
(Ton/Ha)
Costo
producción
($us/Ton)
Estados Unidos 149 387,4 442 2,6 168
Argentina 116 270,03 227 2,5 91
Chile 4 18 730 4,5 162
Bolivia (Valles) 1,5 1,5 129,4 0,9 143,7
Bolivia (Santa Cruz) 3,7 4,3 196,87 1,6 123,04
FTE. CIPCA
DEPENDENCIA DE IMPORTACIONES DE TRIGO
COEFICIENTE DEPENDENCIA IMPORTACIONES TRIGO (%)
Años Producción (Ton) TCP (%) Importaciones Trigo (Ton) TCMT (%) CDIT TCDIT
2009-2010 234.784,00 324.373,32 58,01
2010-2011 239.270,00 1,91 347.535,63 7,14 59,22 2,09
2011-2012 132.657,00 -44,56 408.269,35 17,48 75,48 27,44
2012-2013 186.023,00 40,23 262.140,17 -35,79 58,49 -22,50
2013-2014 159.670,00 -14,17 386.632,39 47,49 70,77 21,00
2014-2015 337.599,00 111,44 304.196,73 -21,32 47,40 -33,03
2015-2016 329.437,00 -2,42 478.139,47 57,18 59,21 24,91
2016-2017 154.435,00 -53,12 609.804,42 27,54 79,79 34,77
2017-2018 301.689,00 95,35 459.997,43 -24,57 60,39 -24,31
Promedio 16,83 9,39 3,80
Fuente: INE, 2022
Años Trigo (Ton) Valor CIF ($us) Harina (Ton) Valor CIF ($us)
2000-2006 3.353.225 475.913.570 891.480 187.369.123
2007-2018 2.386.036 689.550.796 2.688.304 1.014.212.602
Total 5.739.261 1.165.464.366 3.579.784 1.201.581.725
Valor total importado ($us) 2.367.046.091
VALORES IMPORTADOS
COEFICIEBTE DEPENDENCIA IMPORT TRIGO, 2000 -2018 (%)
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
COEF DEPEN % Linear (COEF DEPEN %)
COEFICIENTE DE DEPENDENCIA DE IMPORTACIONES, 2010-2018
Años
Producción
(Ton)
TCP
(%)
Importaciones
Trigo (Ton)
TCMT
(%)
CDIT
(%)
TCDIT
(%)
2009-2010 234.784,00 324.373,32 58,01
2010-2011 239.270,00 1,91 347.535,63 7,14 59,22 2,09
2011-2012 132.657,00 -44,56 408.269,35 17,48 75,48 27,44
2012-2013 186.023,00 40,23 262.140,17 -35,79 58,49 -22,50
2013-2014 159.670,00 -14,17 386.632,39 47,49 70,77 21,00
2014-2015 337.599,00 111,44 304.196,73 -21,32 47,40 -33,03
2015-2016 329.437,00 -2,42 478.139,47 57,18 59,21 24,91
2016-2017 154.435,00 -53,12 609.804,42 27,54 79,79 34,77
2017-2018 301.689,00 95,35 459.997,43 -24,57 60,39 -24,31
Promedio 16,83 9,39 3,80
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
CDIT (%)
-40.00
-30.00
-20.00
-10.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
VCDIT (%)
COMPORTAMIENTO PRODUCCION E IMPORTACION DE TRIGO
(TM)
0.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
300,000.00
400,000.00
500,000.00
600,000.00
700,000.00
Producción de Trigo (Tn)
Total Import Trigo (Tn)
0.00
100,000.00
200,000.00
300,000.00
400,000.00
500,000.00
600,000.00
700,000.00
800,000.00
900,000.00
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Producción e Importación de Trigo (Ton)
Producción (Ton) Importación (Ton)

More Related Content

Featured

PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Applitools
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at WorkGetSmarter
 
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...DevGAMM Conference
 
Barbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
Barbie - Brand Strategy PresentationBarbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
Barbie - Brand Strategy PresentationErica Santiago
 

Featured (20)

PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
 
ChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slidesChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slides
 
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike RoutesMore than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
 
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
 
Barbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
Barbie - Brand Strategy PresentationBarbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
Barbie - Brand Strategy Presentation
 

PRESENTACION TRIGO SINTETIZADO.pptx

  • 1. DEPENDENCIA DE LAS IMPORTACIONES DE TRIGO HUMBERTO CHUQUIMIA VARGAS
  • 2. IMPORTANCIA DEL TRIGO, DESDE EL PUNTO DE VISTA DEL CONSUMO El trigo es uno de los alimentos de consumo diario de los bolivianos, que ocupa el segundo lugar como proveedor de carbohidratos, después de la papa, y por ello el interés desde hace varias décadas por tener políticas y acciones que contribuyan a lograr una mayor autosuficiencia del mismo.
  • 3. DEMANDA DE TRIGO Años Demanda (Tm) Variación (%) 2010 559.157,32 2011 586.805,63 4,94 2012 540.926,35 -7,82 2013 448.163,17 -17,15 2014 546.302,39 21,90 2015 641.795,73 17,48 2016 807.576,47 25,83 2017 764.239,42 -5,37 2018 761.686,43 -0,33 Crecim. prom. Anual (%) 4,94 Crecim. Acumulado (%) 39,49 Fuente: Elaboración propia con basa a datos del INE, 2022
  • 4. CONSUMO PERCAPITA DE TRIGO Años Consumo percápita (Kg/año/persona) Variación (%) 2010 55,75 2011 57,57 3,26 2012 52,23 -9,28 2013 42,60 -18,44 2014 51,12 20,02 2015 59,15 15,69 2016 73,31 23,94 2017 68,35 -6,77 2018 67,13 -1,79 Crecim. prom. Anual (%) 3,33 Crecim. Acumulado (%) 26,64 Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE, 2022
  • 5. FACTORES QUE INFLUYEN Factores que influyen Política de subvención al consumidor Tipo de cambio apreciado Política arancelaria Crecimiento poblacional Incremento en el ingreso disponible
  • 6. CONSECUENCIAS Consecuencias Cambio en el hábito de los consumidores Estructura de consumo dependiente de las importaciones Inseguridad alimentaria y nutricional a mediano y largo plazo Ausencia de soberanía alimentaria en Bolivia
  • 8. LA PARTICIPACION DEL TRIGO EN LA PRODUCCION DE CEREALES Campañas agrícolas Cereales (Tm) Trigo (Tm) Participación (%) 2010-2011 1.969.567,00 239.270,00 12,1 2011-2012 2.229.608,00 132.657,00 5,9 2012-2013 2.273.072,00 186.023,00 8,2 2013-2014 2.449.393,00 159.670,00 6,5 2014-2015 2.934.920,00 337.599,00 11,5 2015-2016 2.660.494,00 329.437,00 12,4 2016-2017 2.279.134,00 154.435,00 6,8 2017-2018 3.267.425,00 301.689,00 9,2 Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE, 2022
  • 9. POSICION DEL TRIGO EN LA PRODUCCION DEL GRUPO CEREALES, EN EL CICLO AGRICOLA 2017 – 2018 (TM) Arroz con cáscara 541.157 Avena 21.906 Cañahua 777 Cebada en grano 46.620 Centeno 275 Maíz en grano (1) 1.260.926 Quínua 70.763 Sorgo en grano (1) 1.023.314 Trigo (1) 301.689 Total 3.267.427 Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE, 2022
  • 10. PRODUCCION DE TRIGO Años Potosi Chuquisaca Tarija Cochabamba La Paz Total Occidente Santa Cruz Bolivia 1999-2000 13.092,00 6.510,00 787,00 14.412,00 1.078,00 35.879,00 41.550,00 77.977,00 2000-2001 13.340,00 7.080,00 768,00 14.373,00 1.089,00 36.650,00 56.640,00 93.823,00 2001-2002 13.625,00 6.590,00 808,00 12.709,00 1.106,00 34.838,00 61.000,00 96.391,00 2002-2003 13.954,00 6.791,00 845,00 12.917,00 1.055,00 35.562,00 53.600,00 89.728,00 2003-2004 14.224,00 7.440,00 817,00 13.282,00 1.026,00 36.789,00 39.460,00 76.775,00 2004-2005 14.769,00 7.864,00 913,00 12.363,00 1.057,00 36.966,00 57.563,00 95.038,00 2005-2006 15.368,00 8.060,00 863,00 12.587,00 1.084,00 37.962,00 81.933,00 120.399,00 2006-2007 15.878,00 7.895,00 906,00 12.597,00 1.094,00 38.370,00 104.260,00 143.126,00 2007-2008 16.277,00 8.564,00 943,00 14.064,00 1.115,00 40.963,00 103.889,00 145.360,00 2008-2009 12.338,00 9.358,00 981,00 15.647,00 1.101,00 39.425,00 142.985,00 182.901,00 2009-2010 13.858,00 9.563,00 934,00 14.768,00 1.073,00 40.196,00 194.087,00 234.784,00 2010-2011 13.597,00 9.207,00 913,00 15.345,00 1.063,00 40.125,00 198.622,00 239.270,00 2011-2012 13.256,00 10.442,00 1.005,00 14.518,00 1.073,00 40.294,00 91.829,00 132.657,00 2012-2013 13.650,00 10.628,00 1.178,00 15.932,00 1.131,00 42.519,00 142.962,00 186.023,00 2013-2014 14.214,00 10.886,00 1.096,00 18.189,00 1.249,00 45.634,00 113.460,00 159.670,00 2014-2015 14.375,00 11.908,00 1.022,00 18.378,00 1.400,00 47.083,00 289.884,00 337.599,00 2015-2016 19.982,00 15.903,00 1.404,00 25.280,00 1.883,00 64.452,00 264.121,00 329.437,00 2016-2017 17.286,00 21.326,00 887,00 22.213,00 1.508,00 63.220,00 90.516,00 154.435,00 2017-2018 18.756,00 27.468,00 1.673,00 27.600,00 1.649,00 77.146,00 223.817,00 301.689,00
  • 11. PARTICIPACION EN LA PRODUCCION Campañas Santa Cruz Occidente 1999-2000 53 46 2000-2001 60 39 2001-2002 63 36 2002-2003 60 40 2003-2004 51 48 2004-2005 61 39 2005-2006 68 32 2006-2007 73 27 2007-2008 71 28 2008-2009 78 22 2009-2010 83 17 2010-2011 83 17 2011-2012 69 30 2012-2013 77 23 2013-2014 71 29 2014-2015 86 14 2015-2016 80 20 2016-2017 59 41 2017-2018 74 26
  • 12. SUPERFICIE CULTIVADA DE TRIGO Años Potosí Chuquisaza Tarija Cochabamba La Paz Total Occidente Santa Cruz Bolivia 1999-2000 17.526,00 12.558,00 1.143,00 15.292,00 2.041,00 48.560,00 41.550,00 90.976,00 2000-2001 18.051,00 13.060,00 1.082,00 15.866,00 2.125,00 50.184,00 36.000,00 87.100,00 2001-2002 18.167,00 12.824,00 1.215,00 14.885,00 2.133,00 49.224,00 55.800,00 105.922,00 2002-2003 18.385,00 12.558,00 1.229,00 14.943,00 2.093,00 49.208,00 35.000,00 85.125,00 2003-2004 18.497,00 13.949,00 1.193,00 15.174,00 2.065,00 50.878,00 30.200,00 82.003,00 2004-2005 18.837,00 13.882,00 1.231,00 14.380,00 2.082,00 50.412,00 29.250,00 80.555,00 2005-2006 19.210,00 15.304,00 1.202,00 14.528,00 2.111,00 52.355,00 48.000,00 101.212,00 2006-2007 19.581,00 15.495,00 1.266,00 14.801,00 2.117,00 53.260,00 62.150,00 116.287,00 2007-2008 19.826,00 15.108,00 1.332,00 14.894,00 2.116,00 53.276,00 56.072,00 110.220,00 2008-2009 16.391,00 15.708,00 1.316,00 16.511,00 2.115,00 52.041,00 70.361,00 123.248,00 2009-2010 17.752,00 16.438,00 1.372,00 15.957,00 2.017,00 53.536,00 93.250,00 147.608,00 2010-2011 17.397,00 16.027,00 1.340,00 16.567,00 2.042,00 53.373,00 119.221,00 173.425,00 2011-2012 16.948,00 16.364,00 1.491,00 15.894,00 2.046,00 52.743,00 82.878,00 136.429,00 2012-2013 17.700,00 16.239,00 1.676,00 17.114,00 2.074,00 54.803,00 74.456,00 129.983,00 2013-2014 17.592,00 17.265,00 1.520,00 17.479,00 2.204,00 56.060,00 93.000,00 149.902,00 2014-2015 17.484,00 18.292,00 1.363,00 17.843,00 2.333,00 57.315,00 138.040,00 196.188,00 2015-2016 18.369,00 19.218,00 1.390,00 18.747,00 2.451,00 60.175,00 168.776,00 229.822,00 2016-2017 17.906,00 18.932,00 1.377,00 18.259,00 2.204,00 58.678,00 114.871,00 174.386,00 2017-2018 17.809,00 24.003,00 1.384,00 23.010,00 2.399,00 68.605,00 130.113,00 199.569,00
  • 14. PARTICIPACION EN LA SUPERFICIE TOTAL Años Occidente Santa Cruz 1999-2000 53,38 45,67 2000-2001 57,62 41,33 2001-2002 46,47 52,68 2002-2003 57,81 41,12 2003-2004 62,04 36,83 2004-2005 62,58 36,31 2005-2006 51,73 47,43 2006-2007 45,80 53,45 2007-2008 48,34 50,87 2008-2009 42,22 57,09 2009-2010 36,27 63,17 2010-2011 30,78 68,74 2011-2012 38,66 60,75 2012-2013 42,16 57,28 2013-2014 37,40 62,04 2014-2015 29,21 70,36 2015-2016 26,18 73,44 2016-2017 33,65 65,87 2017-2018 34,38 65,20
  • 15. RENDIM Años Occidente Santa Cruz Bolivia 1999-2000 684,6 1000,0 857,0 2000-2001 682,0 1573,0 1077,0 2001-2002 660,4 1093,0 910,0 2002-2003 671,0 1531,0 1054,0 2003-2004 671,8 1307,0 936,0 2004-2005 692,0 1968,0 1180,0 2005-2006 684,8 1707,0 1190,0 2006-2007 680,8 1678,0 1231,0 2007-2008 713,4 1853,0 1319,0 2008-2009 712,4 2032,0 1484,0 2009-2010 700,2 2081,0 1591,0 2010-2011 696,6 1666,0 1380,0 2011-2012 706,4 1108,0 972,0 2012-2013 720,8 1920,0 1431,0 2013-2014 753,6 1220,0 1065,0 2014-2015 770,6 2100,0 1721,0 2015-2016 1008,4 1565,0 1433,0 2016-2017 858,8 788,0 886,0 2017-2018 979,6 1720,0 1512,0 Promedio 742,4 1606,1 1242,9
  • 16. VARIACION DEL RENDIMIENTO (%) -60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 Bolivia Occidente Santa Cruz
  • 17. PRODUCTIVIDAD APARENTE DEL TRABAJO Fuente: Elaboración propia con base a datos del INE Años Productividad del trabajo (TM/trab) Tierra trabajadas por trabajador (Has/trab) Santa Cruz Occidente Santa Cruz Occidente 2005 58 1,7 11,25 0,48 2015 76 2,03 14,57 0,61
  • 18. INDICADORES PRODUCTIVOS TRIGO Países Superf promedio cultivada (Has/Flia) Producc prom (Ton/flia) Costo producción ($us/Ha) Rendimiento (Ton/Ha) Costo producción ($us/Ton) Estados Unidos 149 387,4 442 2,6 168 Argentina 116 270,03 227 2,5 91 Chile 4 18 730 4,5 162 Bolivia (Valles) 1,5 1,5 129,4 0,9 143,7 Bolivia (Santa Cruz) 3,7 4,3 196,87 1,6 123,04 FTE. CIPCA
  • 20. COEFICIENTE DEPENDENCIA IMPORTACIONES TRIGO (%) Años Producción (Ton) TCP (%) Importaciones Trigo (Ton) TCMT (%) CDIT TCDIT 2009-2010 234.784,00 324.373,32 58,01 2010-2011 239.270,00 1,91 347.535,63 7,14 59,22 2,09 2011-2012 132.657,00 -44,56 408.269,35 17,48 75,48 27,44 2012-2013 186.023,00 40,23 262.140,17 -35,79 58,49 -22,50 2013-2014 159.670,00 -14,17 386.632,39 47,49 70,77 21,00 2014-2015 337.599,00 111,44 304.196,73 -21,32 47,40 -33,03 2015-2016 329.437,00 -2,42 478.139,47 57,18 59,21 24,91 2016-2017 154.435,00 -53,12 609.804,42 27,54 79,79 34,77 2017-2018 301.689,00 95,35 459.997,43 -24,57 60,39 -24,31 Promedio 16,83 9,39 3,80
  • 21. Fuente: INE, 2022 Años Trigo (Ton) Valor CIF ($us) Harina (Ton) Valor CIF ($us) 2000-2006 3.353.225 475.913.570 891.480 187.369.123 2007-2018 2.386.036 689.550.796 2.688.304 1.014.212.602 Total 5.739.261 1.165.464.366 3.579.784 1.201.581.725 Valor total importado ($us) 2.367.046.091 VALORES IMPORTADOS
  • 22. COEFICIEBTE DEPENDENCIA IMPORT TRIGO, 2000 -2018 (%) 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 COEF DEPEN % Linear (COEF DEPEN %)
  • 23. COEFICIENTE DE DEPENDENCIA DE IMPORTACIONES, 2010-2018 Años Producción (Ton) TCP (%) Importaciones Trigo (Ton) TCMT (%) CDIT (%) TCDIT (%) 2009-2010 234.784,00 324.373,32 58,01 2010-2011 239.270,00 1,91 347.535,63 7,14 59,22 2,09 2011-2012 132.657,00 -44,56 408.269,35 17,48 75,48 27,44 2012-2013 186.023,00 40,23 262.140,17 -35,79 58,49 -22,50 2013-2014 159.670,00 -14,17 386.632,39 47,49 70,77 21,00 2014-2015 337.599,00 111,44 304.196,73 -21,32 47,40 -33,03 2015-2016 329.437,00 -2,42 478.139,47 57,18 59,21 24,91 2016-2017 154.435,00 -53,12 609.804,42 27,54 79,79 34,77 2017-2018 301.689,00 95,35 459.997,43 -24,57 60,39 -24,31 Promedio 16,83 9,39 3,80
  • 25. COMPORTAMIENTO PRODUCCION E IMPORTACION DE TRIGO (TM) 0.00 100,000.00 200,000.00 300,000.00 400,000.00 500,000.00 600,000.00 700,000.00 Producción de Trigo (Tn) Total Import Trigo (Tn) 0.00 100,000.00 200,000.00 300,000.00 400,000.00 500,000.00 600,000.00 700,000.00 800,000.00 900,000.00 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Producción e Importación de Trigo (Ton) Producción (Ton) Importación (Ton)