http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/08/25/52324

1. Most relevant countries to work in between 2015-2019
Bangladesh makes it to the shortlist
In today's age of coupling between economies, cross-border business and multiculturalist societies, the topics of
employment opportunities and mobility are discussed a lot. This personal experiment of mine seeks to identify
countries which are most relevant to work in, in terms of opportunities for both local and foreign workers. The
objective is not to identify the "Best" countries to work in, rather it is to identify the "Relevant" countries to work
in.
There are umpteen lists of "Best Countries to Work In", mostly dominated by the Organisation for Economic Co-
operation and Development (OECD) nations. In reality, economic (and so, employment) opportunities in most
OECD countries will remain dry due to their economic downturn, high rates of unemployment, growing
prominence of "right-wing" parties who do not really favour foreign workers, and paucity in the learning
experience for workers since most functions are outsourced to developing countries.
On the contrary, one might identify relevant countries in terms of their economic opportunities, since the
ensuing opportunities for workforce is a derivative of that. They may not be the "Best" countries to work in due
to inadequate infrastructure, health and safety issues. However, they would be "Relevant" in terms of
opportunities and so, demand.
METHODOLOGY: This experiment is done using IMF's (International Monetary Fund) projected statistics of 190
nations. Seven parameters are used for screening and equal-weight scores assigned for each parameter (except
for deviations in two cases). These parameters are restricted to quantitative data, with only one qualitative
parameter:
(1) Growth and size of the economy - CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of projected GDP (gross domestic
product) in US$ terms from 2015 to 2019 to be above a threshold of 2.0 per cent, with the actual GDP to reach
a minimum US$50 million by 2019. The rationale is that growing economies will create demand for workforce,
plus the absolute size of the GDP signifies a larger critical mass in terms of the employment opportunities.
Hence, countries with their 2019 GDP over US$1.0 billion get an extra score (one of the two deviations from the
equal-weight scoring). US$ terms makes it comparable for foreigners;
(2) Growth in per-capita basis - This is to negate the impact of population growth on the countries' economic
story. Per-capita income is a better indicator of what the person's wallet actually earns, though it is still
susceptible to skewness in income distribution;
(3) Growth of the economy's actual output - Since IMF's GDP data in US$ terms (used in #1) is in current
prices, the CAGR of GDP in constant prices is taken to test the country's 'actual' economic output. This is set to
above a threshold of 2.5 per cent for screening only;
(4) Investments as a per cent of GDP - This indicates the creation of actual productive assets in the country to
support its growth. Countries with an average Investment to GDP of over 15 per cent from 2015-2019 are
taken. Plus, countries with a ratio of over 25 per cent receive an extra score (this is an important parameter in
this experiment and hence, the second of the two deviations from the equal-weight scoring). Another score is
given if the ratio in 2019 is higher than that in 2015, as that augurs well for its future;
(5) Average inflation and its growth - This signifies the "real-income" for workers. It is pointless to have high
per-capita growth with high inflation since then the real income is actually depressed. Countries with an average
inflation of less than 8.0 per cent from 2015-2019 are taken. Another score is given if this is lower in 2019 than
in 2015;
(6) Average unemployment and its growth - Countries with high unemployment rates do not bode well from net
employment perspective, irrespective of their economic growth. Countries with average unemployment rate of
less than 7.0 per cent from 2015-2019 are taken. Another score is given if this is lower in 2019 than in 2015;
(7) Safety factor - This is really to weed out countries with internal civil wars/strife which makes normal living
impossible. Most developed countries receive a score of 2 while developing countries who are not in the cusp of
an all-out internal civil strife receive 1.
RESULTS: Ranking for the Top-30 countries is based on the final scores across the seven parameters. If two or
more countries have the same score, their ranking is based on their GDP CAGR from 2015-2019. This
experiment gives interesting findings, though it is subject to the assumptions made in the methodology.
Publish : 25 Aug, 2014 00:00:00
Sourajit Aiyer
Page 1 of 2Bangladesh makes it to the shortlist | VIEWS & REVIEWS | The Financialexpress-bd
08/27/14http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/08/25/52324/print

2. Print
Of the Top-30 shortlisted countries, seventeen are from Asia itself - of which seven are from ASEAN
(Association of Southeast Asian Nations), four each are from the Far-East Asia and SAARC (South Asian
Association for Regional Cooperation), and one each from GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) and Central Asia. This
indicates that the Asian region is set to emerge as a real reckoner for future employment opportunities.
China seems all set to recover despite its current 'economic plateau' concerns, given the high score it notched.
Hong Kong and Singapore made it. This means trading economies will have opportunities, not just
manufacturing ones.
Amongst the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), only China, Brazil and India made it while
Russia and South Africa did not. High unemployment was the bane for South Africa, while growth in actual
economic output in Russia was below the threshold.
No European nation made the cut, except for Romania. Most Western European nations lost out on economic
growth and unemployment parameters. Emerging European ones like Poland, Lithuania, Serbia, etc. lost due to
high unemployment
Canada and Japan did not make the shortlist since their actual economic output is set to grow below the
threshold.
Latin America is another sweet-spot with as many as five entries. Mexico is expected to gain with US's recovery,
while other medium-sized countries like Chile, Peru and Ecuador are also expected to pick up.
East Africa is another emerging region, with as many as three entries (Ethiopia is assumed as East African for
simplicity).
GCC's entry is Qatar. Saudi Arabia did not make it as its projected per capita GDP in coming years is lower than
the threshold, which does not bode well for foreign workers. Cambodia, another frontier economy, did not make
it as the size of its economy in 2019 at US$26 million would still be much small to create a critical mass of
employment opportunities.
Australia narrowly made the shortlist despite its current economic concerns, New Zealand may remain a bastion
for UK migrant workers given recent initiatives of Christchurch's Canterbury Board, etc. in the UK to pitch for
skills
Overall, the Top-30 shortlisted countries are a fair mix of English and non-English speaking nations; developed
and developing nations; large and small-population nations; and safe and unsafe nations.
LIMITATIONS: It is based largely on quantitative data and does not concentrate much on qualitative
parameters. However, qualitative parameters are often subject to personal judgment which can vary, and the
experiment wanted to cut out impact of personal judgment. The shortlisted ones are skewed towards
emerging/frontier economies. However, that is where the economic opportunities will occur in upcoming years,
and hence the demand for incremental employment. The parameter of safety remains debatable from the
future's perspective. Boko Haram and ebola might impact Nigeria adversely in future even though it is now a
hot-spot as Africa's largest economy.
While insurgency incidents in Pakistan were mostly in outlying areas, they have struck its major cities as well
putting normal civilian life at risk. Kenya's fight against Somali insurgents, Bangladesh's internal political
rivalries between its two big parties, India's economic headwinds, and Thailand's political vacuum could also
pose risks. However, limitations of future uncertainty can impact any experiment.
The writer is a finance professional in India. Views expressed are purely personal.
sourajitaiyer@gmail.com
Copyright © 2014
International Publications Limited.
All rights reserved
Editor : Moazzem Hossain,
Published by the Editor for International Publications Limited from
Tropicana Tower (4th floor), 45, Topkhana Road, GPO Box : 2526 Dhaka-
1000 and printed by him from City Publishing House Ltd., 1 RK Mission
Road, Dhaka-1000.
Telephone : PABX : 9553550 (Hunting), 9513814, 7172017 and
7172012 Fax : 880-2-9567049.
E-mail: editor@thefinancialexpress-bd.com, tfe@bangla.net,
fe@accesstel.net and fexpress68@gmail.com
Page 2 of 2Bangladesh makes it to the shortlist | VIEWS & REVIEWS | The Financialexpress-bd
08/27/14http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/08/25/52324/print