This order summarizes a writ petition seeking to direct respondents to appoint an arbitrator to determine rents and compensation for property requisitioned for military purposes in 1963. The property belonged to the petitioner's ancestors and included bungalows and land. While disputes over the land portion were resolved, the issues regarding rents and compensation for the bungalows remained undecided. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to appoint an arbitrator within 4 weeks as provided for under the relevant Act to resolve the outstanding matters relating to the building portions.
The beedi and cigar workers (conditions of employment) amendment act, 1993UllalNews
ಬೀಡಿ ಉಧ್ಯಮವನ್ನೇ ನಂಬಿರುವ ಸಂಸಾರಗಳು ಬೀದಿ ಪಾಲಾಗುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆ ಇದೆ. ಆದಷ್ಟು ಬೇಗ ಸರಕಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಹತ್ತಿರ ಇರುವ ಜನರ ಸೇವಕ ಶಾಸನ ಸಭೆಗೆ ಆಯ್ಕೆ ಆದ ಜನಪ್ರತಿನಿದಿಗಳು ಕೂಡಲೇ ಸ್ಪಂದಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ
The beedi and cigar workers (conditions of employment) amendment act, 1993UllalNews
ಬೀಡಿ ಉಧ್ಯಮವನ್ನೇ ನಂಬಿರುವ ಸಂಸಾರಗಳು ಬೀದಿ ಪಾಲಾಗುವ ಸಾಧ್ಯತೆ ಇದೆ. ಆದಷ್ಟು ಬೇಗ ಸರಕಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಹತ್ತಿರ ಇರುವ ಜನರ ಸೇವಕ ಶಾಸನ ಸಭೆಗೆ ಆಯ್ಕೆ ಆದ ಜನಪ್ರತಿನಿದಿಗಳು ಕೂಡಲೇ ಸ್ಪಂದಿಸಬೇಕಾಗಿದೆ
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Compilation of Judgments wherein it is held that "Suit is not maintainable"Legal
Compilation of Judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and High Courts, wherein it is held that "Suit not is maintainable". This document will be helpful for those who are looking for a complilation of judgments whrein it is held that "Suit not is maintainable" on the one ground or the other.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA
Writ Petition No.20189 of 1998
Dated: 07-03-2007
Between:
1. Sultan Ghalib Bin Awadh Al-Quaiti and 2 others.
... Petitioners
and
1. Union of India, rep.by Miliatary Estate Officer,
A.P.Circle,
Secunderabad and 3 others.
... Respondents
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking mandamus declaring the inaction of
respondents in not paying or determining the rents as well as the
compensation for the property SAIF GULSHAN, situated in Sy.Nos.34/1,
34/2, 35/1, 35/2, 36/1/1, 36/1/2, 36/2 and 36/3 at Gudi Malkapur, Hyderabad,
as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith
take action under Section 8(1-b) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of
Immovable Property Act, 1952 (for short, ‘the Act’) to appoint an Arbitrator for
expeditious resolution of the said dispute and payment to the petitioners.
2. 2. Facts, in brief, are: The property viz., SAIF GULSHAN comprising of
three big bungalows, open land with out-houses etc., belongs to the
ancestors of the petitioners. The first respondent as per his proceedings
No.AP/1002/Req/124, dated 23-08-1963 requisitioned the same for military
purposes and consequently under Section 29(1) of the Defence of India Act,
1962, a notification of requisition of the said property was issued on
06-09-1963. The respondents conducted a panchanama dated
12-09-1963 and requisitioned the property and obtained possession under
their control. On 03-02-1970 the second respondent issued a show cause
notice as to why the said property should not be acquired and thereafter
issued a final notification No.H3/996/70, dated 04-03-1970 under Section
7(1) of the Act.
The said notification was published in the A.P. Gazette, dated 12-03-1970
and thereby the said property absolutely vested with the first respondent.
As per the provisions of the Act, the requisitioning and acquiring authority
i.e. the Central Government is liable to pay rents for the period for which the
property is under requisition as well as compensation if the property is later
on acquired.
It is stated that so far as the lands in respect of the property in question are
concerned an Arbitrator was appointed as per G.O.Ms.No.276, dated
29-03-1973 and he passed award on 24-09-1981. Questioning the said
award various appeals were preferred being A.A.O.No.737 of 1981 and
batch, which were decided by a Division Bench of this Court, vide judgment
dated
15-04-1986. Against the said judgment various claimants preferred appeals
being Civil Appeal Nos.2010 of 1986, 1975 of 1992 and 4406 of 1996
before the Apex Court, which were decided on 28-04-1987 and 05-11-1997
respectively and thus the dispute concerning to land was concluded.
3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the matter relating to the
3. bungalows remained undecided inasmuch as neither the competent
authority appointed any Arbitrator nor there was any action by the
respondents in releasing and/or determining the payment of rents or the
question of compensation with respect to the buildings portion.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. As the relief sought for in this writ petition itself is in a narrow
compass i.e. for appointment of an Arbitrator as provided under Section 8(1-
b) of the Act, this Court is of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of
with a direction to the respondents to appoint an Arbitrator as provided for
under the provisions of the Act within a period of four weeks from today, if
not already appointed.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. No costs.
_______________________________
JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA
Dt.07-03-2007
GLV