2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
https://www.hubspot.com/state-of-marketing
· Scaling relationships and proving ROI
· Social media is the place for search, sales, and service
· Authentic influencer partnerships fuel brand growth
· The strongest connections happen via call, click, chat, and camera.
· Time saved with AI leads to more creative work
· Seeking: A single source of truth
· TLDR; Get on social, try AI, and align your systems.
· More human marketing, powered by robots
ChatGPT is a revolutionary addition to the world since its introduction in 2022. A big shift in the sector of information gathering and processing happened because of this chatbot. What is the story of ChatGPT? How is the bot responding to prompts and generating contents? Swipe through these slides prepared by Expeed Software, a web development company regarding the development and technical intricacies of ChatGPT!
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
The realm of product design is a constantly changing environment where technology and style intersect. Every year introduces fresh challenges and exciting trends that mold the future of this captivating art form. In this piece, we delve into the significant trends set to influence the look and functionality of product design in the year 2024.
2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
https://www.hubspot.com/state-of-marketing
· Scaling relationships and proving ROI
· Social media is the place for search, sales, and service
· Authentic influencer partnerships fuel brand growth
· The strongest connections happen via call, click, chat, and camera.
· Time saved with AI leads to more creative work
· Seeking: A single source of truth
· TLDR; Get on social, try AI, and align your systems.
· More human marketing, powered by robots
ChatGPT is a revolutionary addition to the world since its introduction in 2022. A big shift in the sector of information gathering and processing happened because of this chatbot. What is the story of ChatGPT? How is the bot responding to prompts and generating contents? Swipe through these slides prepared by Expeed Software, a web development company regarding the development and technical intricacies of ChatGPT!
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
The realm of product design is a constantly changing environment where technology and style intersect. Every year introduces fresh challenges and exciting trends that mold the future of this captivating art form. In this piece, we delve into the significant trends set to influence the look and functionality of product design in the year 2024.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
Mental health has been in the news quite a bit lately. Dozens of U.S. states are currently suing Meta for contributing to the youth mental health crisis by inserting addictive features into their products, while the U.S. Surgeon General is touring the nation to bring awareness to the growing epidemic of loneliness and isolation. The country has endured periods of low national morale, such as in the 1970s when high inflation and the energy crisis worsened public sentiment following the Vietnam War. The current mood, however, feels different. Gallup recently reported that national mental health is at an all-time low, with few bright spots to lift spirits.
To better understand how Americans are feeling and their attitudes towards mental health in general, ThinkNow conducted a nationally representative quantitative survey of 1,500 respondents and found some interesting differences among ethnic, age and gender groups.
Technology
For example, 52% agree that technology and social media have a negative impact on mental health, but when broken out by race, 61% of Whites felt technology had a negative effect, and only 48% of Hispanics thought it did.
While technology has helped us keep in touch with friends and family in faraway places, it appears to have degraded our ability to connect in person. Staying connected online is a double-edged sword since the same news feed that brings us pictures of the grandkids and fluffy kittens also feeds us news about the wars in Israel and Ukraine, the dysfunction in Washington, the latest mass shooting and the climate crisis.
Hispanics may have a built-in defense against the isolation technology breeds, owing to their large, multigenerational households, strong social support systems, and tendency to use social media to stay connected with relatives abroad.
Age and Gender
When asked how individuals rate their mental health, men rate it higher than women by 11 percentage points, and Baby Boomers rank it highest at 83%, saying it’s good or excellent vs. 57% of Gen Z saying the same.
Gen Z spends the most amount of time on social media, so the notion that social media negatively affects mental health appears to be correlated. Unfortunately, Gen Z is also the generation that’s least comfortable discussing mental health concerns with healthcare professionals. Only 40% of them state they’re comfortable discussing their issues with a professional compared to 60% of Millennials and 65% of Boomers.
Race Affects Attitudes
As seen in previous research conducted by ThinkNow, Asian Americans lag other groups when it comes to awareness of mental health issues. Twenty-four percent of Asian Americans believe that having a mental health issue is a sign of weakness compared to the 16% average for all groups. Asians are also considerably less likely to be aware of mental health services in their communities (42% vs. 55%) and most likely to seek out information on social media (51% vs. 35%).
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
This article is all about what AI trends will emerge in the field of creative operations in 2024. All the marketers and brand builders should be aware of these trends for their further use and save themselves some time!
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
Mental health has been in the news quite a bit lately. Dozens of U.S. states are currently suing Meta for contributing to the youth mental health crisis by inserting addictive features into their products, while the U.S. Surgeon General is touring the nation to bring awareness to the growing epidemic of loneliness and isolation. The country has endured periods of low national morale, such as in the 1970s when high inflation and the energy crisis worsened public sentiment following the Vietnam War. The current mood, however, feels different. Gallup recently reported that national mental health is at an all-time low, with few bright spots to lift spirits.
To better understand how Americans are feeling and their attitudes towards mental health in general, ThinkNow conducted a nationally representative quantitative survey of 1,500 respondents and found some interesting differences among ethnic, age and gender groups.
Technology
For example, 52% agree that technology and social media have a negative impact on mental health, but when broken out by race, 61% of Whites felt technology had a negative effect, and only 48% of Hispanics thought it did.
While technology has helped us keep in touch with friends and family in faraway places, it appears to have degraded our ability to connect in person. Staying connected online is a double-edged sword since the same news feed that brings us pictures of the grandkids and fluffy kittens also feeds us news about the wars in Israel and Ukraine, the dysfunction in Washington, the latest mass shooting and the climate crisis.
Hispanics may have a built-in defense against the isolation technology breeds, owing to their large, multigenerational households, strong social support systems, and tendency to use social media to stay connected with relatives abroad.
Age and Gender
When asked how individuals rate their mental health, men rate it higher than women by 11 percentage points, and Baby Boomers rank it highest at 83%, saying it’s good or excellent vs. 57% of Gen Z saying the same.
Gen Z spends the most amount of time on social media, so the notion that social media negatively affects mental health appears to be correlated. Unfortunately, Gen Z is also the generation that’s least comfortable discussing mental health concerns with healthcare professionals. Only 40% of them state they’re comfortable discussing their issues with a professional compared to 60% of Millennials and 65% of Boomers.
Race Affects Attitudes
As seen in previous research conducted by ThinkNow, Asian Americans lag other groups when it comes to awareness of mental health issues. Twenty-four percent of Asian Americans believe that having a mental health issue is a sign of weakness compared to the 16% average for all groups. Asians are also considerably less likely to be aware of mental health services in their communities (42% vs. 55%) and most likely to seek out information on social media (51% vs. 35%).
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
This article is all about what AI trends will emerge in the field of creative operations in 2024. All the marketers and brand builders should be aware of these trends for their further use and save themselves some time!
A report by thenetworkone and Kurio.
The contributing experts and agencies are (in an alphabetical order): Sylwia Rytel, Social Media Supervisor, 180heartbeats + JUNG v MATT (PL), Sharlene Jenner, Vice President - Director of Engagement Strategy, Abelson Taylor (USA), Alex Casanovas, Digital Director, Atrevia (ES), Dora Beilin, Senior Social Strategist, Barrett Hoffher (USA), Min Seo, Campaign Director, Brand New Agency (KR), Deshé M. Gully, Associate Strategist, Day One Agency (USA), Francesca Trevisan, Strategist, Different (IT), Trevor Crossman, CX and Digital Transformation Director; Olivia Hussey, Strategic Planner; Simi Srinarula, Social Media Manager, The Hallway (AUS), James Hebbert, Managing Director, Hylink (CN / UK), Mundy Álvarez, Planning Director; Pedro Rojas, Social Media Manager; Pancho González, CCO, Inbrax (CH), Oana Oprea, Head of Digital Planning, Jam Session Agency (RO), Amy Bottrill, Social Account Director, Launch (UK), Gaby Arriaga, Founder, Leonardo1452 (MX), Shantesh S Row, Creative Director, Liwa (UAE), Rajesh Mehta, Chief Strategy Officer; Dhruv Gaur, Digital Planning Lead; Leonie Mergulhao, Account Supervisor - Social Media & PR, Medulla (IN), Aurelija Plioplytė, Head of Digital & Social, Not Perfect (LI), Daiana Khaidargaliyeva, Account Manager, Osaka Labs (UK / USA), Stefanie Söhnchen, Vice President Digital, PIABO Communications (DE), Elisabeth Winiartati, Managing Consultant, Head of Global Integrated Communications; Lydia Aprina, Account Manager, Integrated Marketing and Communications; Nita Prabowo, Account Manager, Integrated Marketing and Communications; Okhi, Web Developer, PNTR Group (ID), Kei Obusan, Insights Director; Daffi Ranandi, Insights Manager, Radarr (SG), Gautam Reghunath, Co-founder & CEO, Talented (IN), Donagh Humphreys, Head of Social and Digital Innovation, THINKHOUSE (IRE), Sarah Yim, Strategy Director, Zulu Alpha Kilo (CA).
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
The search marketing landscape is evolving rapidly with new technologies, and professionals, like you, rely on innovative paid search strategies to meet changing demands.
It’s important that you’re ready to implement new strategies in 2024.
Check this out and learn the top trends in paid search advertising that are expected to gain traction, so you can drive higher ROI more efficiently in 2024.
You’ll learn:
- The latest trends in AI and automation, and what this means for an evolving paid search ecosystem.
- New developments in privacy and data regulation.
- Emerging ad formats that are expected to make an impact next year.
Watch Sreekant Lanka from iQuanti and Irina Klein from OneMain Financial as they dive into the future of paid search and explore the trends, strategies, and technologies that will shape the search marketing landscape.
If you’re looking to assess your paid search strategy and design an industry-aligned plan for 2024, then this webinar is for you.
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
From their humble beginnings in 1984, TED has grown into the world’s most powerful amplifier for speakers and thought-leaders to share their ideas. They have over 2,400 filmed talks (not including the 30,000+ TEDx videos) freely available online, and have hosted over 17,500 events around the world.
With over one billion views in a year, it’s no wonder that so many speakers are looking to TED for ideas on how to share their message more effectively.
The article “5 Public-Speaking Tips TED Gives Its Speakers”, by Carmine Gallo for Forbes, gives speakers five practical ways to connect with their audience, and effectively share their ideas on stage.
Whether you are gearing up to get on a TED stage yourself, or just want to master the skills that so many of their speakers possess, these tips and quotes from Chris Anderson, the TED Talks Curator, will encourage you to make the most impactful impression on your audience.
See the full article and more summaries like this on SpeakerHub here: https://speakerhub.com/blog/5-presentation-tips-ted-gives-its-speakers
See the original article on Forbes here:
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=http://www.forbes.com/sites/carminegallo/2016/05/06/5-public-speaking-tips-ted-gives-its-speakers/&refURL=&referrer=#5c07a8221d9b
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
Everyone is in agreement that ChatGPT (and other generative AI tools) will shape the future of work. Yet there is little consensus on exactly how, when, and to what extent this technology will change our world.
Businesses that extract maximum value from ChatGPT will use it as a collaborative tool for everything from brainstorming to technical maintenance.
For individuals, now is the time to pinpoint the skills the future professional will need to thrive in the AI age.
Check out this presentation to understand what ChatGPT is, how it will shape the future of work, and how you can prepare to take advantage.
A brief introduction to DataScience with explaining of the concepts, algorithms, machine learning, supervised and unsupervised learning, clustering, statistics, data preprocessing, real-world applications etc.
It's part of a Data Science Corner Campaign where I will be discussing the fundamentals of DataScience, AIML, Statistics etc.
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
Here's my presentation on by proven best practices how to manage your work time effectively and how to improve your productivity. It includes practical tips and how to use tools such as Slack, Google Apps, Hubspot, Google Calendar, Gmail and others.
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
The six step guide to practical project management
If you think managing projects is too difficult, think again.
We’ve stripped back project management processes to the
basics – to make it quicker and easier, without sacrificing
the vital ingredients for success.
“If you’re looking for some real-world guidance, then The Six Step Guide to Practical Project Management will help.”
Dr Andrew Makar, Tactical Project Management
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Applitools
During this webinar, Anand Bagmar demonstrates how AI tools such as ChatGPT can be applied to various stages of the software development life cycle (SDLC) using an eCommerce application case study. Find the on-demand recording and more info at https://applitools.info/b59
Key takeaways:
• Learn how to use ChatGPT to add AI power to your testing and test automation
• Understand the limitations of the technology and where human expertise is crucial
• Gain insight into different AI-based tools
• Adopt AI-based tools to stay relevant and optimize work for developers and testers
* ChatGPT and OpenAI belong to OpenAI, L.L.C.
1. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
From a Turkish and International Perspective
Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights on the Internet│Protective Measures at Customs│Patent Mock Trial│Mock
WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │❹
Türk ve Uluslararası Bakış Açısıyla
İnternette Fikri Hak İhlalleri │Gümrüklerde Koruma Tedbirleri │Patent Farazi Davası │Alan Adı Uyuşmazlığında WIPO
Nezdinde Farazi UDRP Tahkimi
Erik WILBERS │ WIPO Resolution of Domain Name Disputes Procedure
Mock WIPO Case-UDRP Arbitration Scenario on Domain Name Disputes
Alan Adı Uyuşmazlığında WIPO Nezdinde Farazi UDRP Tahkim Senaryosu
Att. Ahu GÜNEYLİ │ Compart - WIPO complaint
Att. Emre Kerim YARDIMCI │ Compart – WIPO response │Compart – WIPO yanıt
Şikayetçi Avukatının Şikayet Layihasını sunması │ Complainants’ Attorney's Pleading
Karşı Yan Avukatının Şikayete Cevap Layihasını sunması │ Respondents’ Attorney's Defence
Destekleyenler │ Supporters
N.B. Except for personal use and other purposes where use is allowed pursuant to the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works No.5846, this file or any documents enclosed in this file,
containing communiqués presented within the scope of the seminar and presentations and petitions in pdf, powerpoint, word and similar format submitted by parties' counsel during mock
trial and arbitration proceedings, shall not be made copies of, be duplicated by means of devices used to transfer signs, audio or images, published, or communicated to the general public in
a manner that third parties may have access in place and time they choose for any use without the written consent of AIPPI Turkey - Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property
Rights, even if the name of the work and the author is indicated. │Seminer kapsamında sunulan tebliğler ile farazi dava ve tahkim süreçlerinde taraf vekillerince ibraz edilen pdf, powerpoint,
word ve benzeri formattaki sunum ve dilekçelerin yer aldığı bu dosyanın veya içindeki herhangi bir dokümanın, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Yasası’nda düzenlenmiş olan kişisel kullanım
dahil diğer kullanım serbestilerinde öngörülen amaçlar dışında herhangi bir amaçla eser sahibinin ve eserin adı belirtilerek dahi olsa AIPPI Türkiye-Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği’nin
yazılı izni olmaksızın ikinci bir kopyası çıkartılmamalı veya işaret, ses ve görüntü nakline yarayan araçlara kaydedilmek suretiyle çoğaltılmamalı, yayılmamalı ve üçüncü kişilerin seçtikleri yer ve
zamanda erişimlerini sağlayacak şekilde umuma iletilmemelidir.
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
1
2. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Erik WILBERS WIPO Resolution of Domain Name Disputes Procedure: The Uniform
WIPO, Director, Arbitration and Mediation Center, Geneva Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy: Introduction and Update
Following studies in the United States and the Netherlands, Erik Wilbers was a research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property Law.
Before joining the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), he practiced with the law firm of Clifford Chance, was on the legal staff of the Iran-
United States Claims Tribunal, and headed a division of the Compensation Commission of the United Nations Security Council. At the WIPO Arbitration
and Mediation Center, Erik is engaged in the creation and operation of policies and facilities that enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of intellectual
property dispute resolution, including on the Internet.
1 2
3 4
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
2
3. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
5 6
7 8
9 10
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
3
4. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
11 12
13 14
15 16
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
4
5. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
17 18
19 20
21 22
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
5
6. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
23 24
25 26
27 28
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
6
7. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
29 30
31 32
33 34
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
7
8. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
35 36
37 38
39 40
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
8
9. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
41 42
43 44
45 46
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
9
10. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
M.Sci.Mech.Eng. Uğur Gürşat YALÇINER WIPO Domain Name Panelist
Patent and Trademark Attorney Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain
Yalçıner Patent and Consulting Ltd., Ankara Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
ODTÜ Makina Mühendisliği bölümünden önce Lisans sonra da Yüksek Lisans diploması aldı. ODTÜ’de Öğretim Görevlisi olarak çalıştıktan sonra
WIPO’nun danışmanı olarak Türkiye, Mısır ve Gana’da görev yaptı. 1994-1999 yılları arasında da Türk Patent Enstitüsü Başkanı ve Yönetim Kurulu
Başkanı olarak çalıştı. YALÇINER, halen YALÇINER PATENT ve DANIŞMANLIK firmasının ortağı ve Genel Müdürü olarak görev yapmaktadır.
Mahkemelerde Bilirkişilik yapmakta, ODTÜ’de part-time Öğretim Görevlisi olarak çalışmakta,Patent ve Marka Vekilleri Derneğinin Başkanlığını
yürütmektedir. YALÇINER aynı zamanda WIPO’nun Internet Alan Adları Hakemi olarak görev yapmaktadır. Sınai haklar ve uygulamaları konusunda
yurtiçi ve yurtdışında deneyime sahip olan YALÇINER’in 4 kitap ve 300’den fazla makaleden oluşan yayınları bulunmaktadır.
WIPO Domain Name Panelist Resolution of the Internet Domain Name
Att.Dilek ÜSTÜN EKDİAL
Dispute by Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
İstanbul Patent and Trademark Consultancy Ltd., İstanbul
before WIPO
Date of Birth: January 3, 1968 Nationality: Turkish Republic; EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: LLB Faculty of Law, University of
Istanbul, Turkey 1992; Admitted to practice in the bar of Istanbul, 1994; Admitted as a Trademark Attorney, 1996; Admitted as a Patent Attorney,
1996; Admitted as a European Patent Attorney 2000; IP Expert Witness- Before Turkish IP Courts since 2005; WIPO Domain Name Panelist since 2004;
Member of INTA Panel of Neutrals 2008-2011; LANGUAGES Turkish and English
WIPO Domain Name Panelist
Att.Selma Ünlü
Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain
NSN Law Office, İstanbul
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
Graduated from Istanbul University, Faculty of Law in 1989. She obtained her Diploma in Private International Law, from Wolverhampton University,
in United Kingdom by writing her thesis on domicile of foreigners.
She have 22 years experience in law practise; until her joining to NSN Law Firm as a Senior Partner, she worked 14 years as a Senior Partner in a
Private Law Firm and lead Intellectual Property, Commercial litigation, IT, Life Science and Advertising, Media and Consumer Departments. Currently,
she is focusing on the same practise areas and advising companies on a wide range of matters from regulatory to the product liability, from
intellectual property to information technologies, commerial litigation to corporate law, from compliance to and anti-corruption due diligence.
Being a sworn translator, she is fluent in English.
MOCK WIPO CASE-UDRP ARBITRATION SCENARIO ON DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES
Factual Background
The Complainant, “Compart AG,” was founded in Germany in 1992 and has been providing services in the field of
“software projects / document output and management.” It carries on business in 31 countries and has annual sales of
over EUR 6 million.
The Complainant registered the trademark COMPART in 1984 in Germany in classes 09, 16 and 42. The trademark is
currently registered in the name of the Complainant in numerous countries
The Domain Name was registered by the Respondent on June 4, 2005 when it purchased it from its previous owner.
The Respondent is using the Domain Name in connection with a domain parking website offering links to third parties’
products, including software products.
Parties’ Contentions
A. Complainant
The Complainant alleges that;
• The Complainant was founded in 1992 as Compart Systemhaus GmbH. Since 2000 the company has focused on
document output and management and has evolved into an international enterprise group comprising the parent
company, Compart AG, and three regional subsidiaries in Germany, North America and Spain/Portugal. The
Complainant has trademark registrations for COMPART in numerous countries worldwide including:
o German trademark number 1086545 registered as of September 11, 1984 in classes 9, 16 and 42;
o German trademark number 30546409.4 registered as of August 3, 2005 in classes 9 and 42;
o German trademark number 30546410.8 registered as of August 3, 2005 in classes 9 and 42;
o International registration number 884004 registered as of February 3, 2006 with effect in Switzerland, Romania,
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
10
11. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Norway, Turkey, USA, and the European Community in classes 9 and 42.
• The Domain Name was first registered in 1996 in the name of Comp Art Associates of Louisville, USA and was used
in connection with graphic design, marketing and advertising services until 2001 when the company was renamed.
The Domain Name was registered by Domain Deluxe in Hong Kong in 2001. On or after July 19, 2004 the public
WhoIs data for the Domain Name was protected by a privacy shield. The Respondent in this proceeding is Vertical
Axis, Inc., a company known for trying to make money by registering third parties’ trademarks as domain names.
Vertical Axis, Inc. has been a respondent in at least 27 UDRP proceedings; in 12 of those proceedings, the panel
found in favour of the Complainant and ordered transfer of the domain names at issue.
• The Respondent is using the Domain Name in connection with a domain parking website offering links to third
parties’ products, including software products.
• The Complainant offered to pay the Respondent US$7,000 for the transfer of the domain name in September
2008. That offer was rejected. In February 2009, the Complainant received further emails from
DomainBrokers.com on behalf of the Respondent in which it offered to transfer the domain name for the sum of
US$48,000.
• The Domain Name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks since it consists entirely of the highly
distinctive term COMPART. The Complainant relies on a number of decisions under the UDRP in which it was held
that the fact that the marks relied upon by the Complainant contain additional design elements does not prevent
a finding of confusing similarity under the Policy.
• The Respondent is using the Domain Name to divert Internet users to a website which contains information on
various products, including “software”. The website available at the disputed Domain Name provides links to
websites of third parties. The website at <www.compart.com> is used to earn PPC revenues for redirecting
Internet users to third parties’ websites and thus capitalizing on the Complainant’s mark. Such use is not a bona
fide use.
• The Respondent has no right or legitimate interest in the Domain Name. The Complainant has not licensed or
otherwise permitted the Respondent to use any of its trademarks and has not permitted the Respondent to apply
for or use any domain name incorporating the trademark COMPART.
• The Respondent is using the Domain Name to divert Internet users to a website which contains information on
various products, including “software”. The website available at the disputed Domain Name provides links to
websites of third parties. The website at “www.compart.com” is used to earn PPC revenues for redirecting
Internet users to third parties’ websites and thus capitalizing on the Complainant’s mark. Such use is not a bona
fide use pursuant to paragraph 4(c) (i) of the Policy.
• The Respondent is not making a legitimate non-commercial use of the Domain Name. There is no evidence that
the Respondent trades under the domain name or the name COMPART or that it is commonly known by the
Domain Name or the name COMPART.
• Furthermore, the website available at the Domain Name contains links and ads referring to direct competitors of
the Complainant, including <nextag.co.uk>, <software4students.co.uk>, <31touchdownloads.com>,
<ascentive.com>.
• It is inconceivable that the Respondent without knowledge of the Complainant would have placed content on the
website which is related to software products, as the Domain Name has no inherent connection to such products.
• The Respondent should have researched the Complainant or the Complainant’s trademark while registering the
Disputed Domain Name even if the Respondent did not specifically know of the Complainant or of its trademark
rights As stated in Champagne Lanson v. Development Services/MailPlanet.com, Inc., (WIPO Case No. D2006-0006,
<lanson.com>) wilful blindness is a proof of bad faith.
The Complainant submitted evidences and consequently requested the Disputed Domain Name to be transferred.
B. Respondent
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
11
12. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Submissions by the Respondent are as follows
• This is a case of reverse domain name hijacking.
• The Complainant only initiated these proceedings after it was unable to purchase the Domain Name through a
series of negotiations culminating in an offer of US$20,000 which the Respondent did not accept. Contrary to the
Complainant’s suggestion that it merely offered $7,000 for the immediate transfer of the domain name, there
were back-and-forth offers and counter-offers, with Complainant raising its offer to US$12,000 and again to
US$20,000. The Respondent has a legitimate interest in the Domain Name because it incorporates the common
dictionary word “compart,” which means “to separate and mark out in parts; to subdivide.”
• The Respondent uses the Disputed Domain Name via HitFarm.com which provides “domain parking services.”
Contrary to the indications in the Complaint, no ads referring to competitor software companies’ software and
other products are included in the website at the Disputed Domain Name. In order to prove this, the Respondent
presented evidence showing links to automobile products and generic goods and services.
• The Respondent uses the Disputed Domain with the domain name parking service HitFarm.com, which displays
pay-per-click (“PPC”) advertising links on the web site. Contrary to the suggestion in the Complaint, the
Respondent has not used the Domain Name to display ads for software or other goods and services competitive
with the Complainant’s. A review of the archive.org print-outs annexed to the Complaint, as well as additional
web page screenshots from DomainTools.com, supports Respondent’s position that it has not used the Domain
Name in connection with software but, rather, with respect to auto parts, related automobile products, and
generic goods and services.
• The Respondent presented evidences demonstrating a Google search result of 899,000 hits in order to prove that
the word COMPART is used by 3rd parties. Additionally, there are numerous trademark registrations incorporating
the word COMPART in Germany and the U.S.
• The Respondent has not engaged in bad faith registration or use. A common word domain name is only registered
in bad faith where the purpose of the registration is to profit from a trademark. There is no such evidence here.
The Respondent registered the Domain Name solely because it incorporates the common word “compart.” The
Respondent had absolutely no knowledge of Complainant when it acquired the registration of the Domain Name
on June 4, 2005, nor was there a basis for such knowledge. The Complainant did not file its trademark application
for COMPART in the U.S. until February 3, 2006, which is eight months after the Respondent acquired the Domain
Name. Although the Complainant had a German registered trademark when the Respondent registered the
Domain Name, it is well-established that a respondent does not need to search the trademark registries in every
country in the world.
The Respondent submitted evidences and consequently requested refusal of the Complainant’s request.
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
12
13. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
M.Sci.Mech.Eng. Uğur Gürşat YALÇINER WIPO Domain Name Panelist
Patent and Trademark Attorney Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain
Yalçıner Patent and Consulting Ltd., Ankara Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
ODTÜ Makina Mühendisliği bölümünden önce Lisans sonra da Yüksek Lisans diploması aldı. ODTÜ’de Öğretim Görevlisi olarak çalıştıktan sonra
WIPO’nun danışmanı olarak Türkiye, Mısır ve Gana’da görev yaptı. 1994-1999 yılları arasında da Türk Patent Enstitüsü Başkanı ve Yönetim Kurulu
Başkanı olarak çalıştı. YALÇINER, halen YALÇINER PATENT ve DANIŞMANLIK firmasının ortağı ve Genel Müdürü olarak görev yapmaktadır.
Mahkemelerde Bilirkişilik yapmakta, ODTÜ’de part-time Öğretim Görevlisi olarak çalışmakta,Patent ve Marka Vekilleri Derneğinin Başkanlığını
yürütmektedir. YALÇINER aynı zamanda WIPO’nun Internet Alan Adları Hakemi olarak görev yapmaktadır. Sınai haklar ve uygulamaları konusunda
yurtiçi ve yurtdışında deneyime sahip olan YALÇINER’in 4 kitap ve 300’den fazla makaleden oluşan yayınları bulunmaktadır.
WIPO Domain Name Panelist Resolution of the Internet Domain Name
Att.Dilek ÜSTÜN EKDİAL
Dispute by Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
İstanbul Patent and Trademark Consultancy Ltd., İstanbul
before WIPO
Date of Birth: January 3, 1968 Nationality: Turkish Republic; EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS: LLB Faculty of Law, University of
Istanbul, Turkey 1992; Admitted to practice in the bar of Istanbul, 1994; Admitted as a Trademark Attorney, 1996; Admitted as a Patent Attorney,
1996; Admitted as a European Patent Attorney 2000; IP Expert Witness- Before Turkish IP Courts since 2005; WIPO Domain Name Panelist since 2004;
Member of INTA Panel of Neutrals 2008-2011; LANGUAGES Turkish and English
WIPO Domain Name Panelist
Att.Selma Ünlü
Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain
NSN Law Office, İstanbul
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
Graduated from Istanbul University, Faculty of Law in 1989. She obtained her Diploma in Private International Law, from Wolverhampton University,
in United Kingdom by writing her thesis on domicile of foreigners.
She have 22 years experience in law practise; until her joining to NSN Law Firm as a Senior Partner, she worked 14 years as a Senior Partner in a
Private Law Firm and lead Intellectual Property, Commercial litigation, IT, Life Science and Advertising, Media and Consumer Departments. Currently,
she is focusing on the same practise areas and advising companies on a wide range of matters from regulatory to the product liability, from
intellectual property to information technologies, commerial litigation to corporate law, from compliance to and anti-corruption due diligence.
Being a sworn translator, she is fluent in English.
ALAN ADI UYUŞMAZLIĞINDA WIPO NEZDİNDE FARAZİ UDRP TAHKİMİ
MADDİ VAKIA
Şikayetçi “Compart AG” 1992 yılında Almanya’da kurulmuş olup “yazılım projeleri ve doküman yönetimi” konularında
hizmet vermektedir. İş hacmini 31 ülkeye ve yıllık 6,000,000 Euro’ya çıkarmıştır. Şikayetçi, COMPART markasını ilk olarak
1984 yılında 09, 16 ve 42. sınıflarda Almanya’da tescil ettirmiştir. Sözkonusu marka halen bir çok ülkede Şikayetçi adına
tescillidir.
Şikayet Edilen, “Compart.com / Vertical Axis, Inc.”, uyuşmazlık konusu alan adını önceki sahibinden 4 Haziran 2005
tarihinde, önceki sahibinden satınalma yolu ile devir almıştır.
Uyuşmazlığa konu alan adı şikayet tarihi itibariyle, üçüncü kişilerin yazılımları da dahil olmak üzere ürünlerini içeren
sitelere link (bağlantı) veren bir “alan adı park sitesi - domain parking website” olarak kullanılmaktadır.
TARAFLARIN İDDİA, SAVUNMA ve TALEPLERİ
Şikayetçi tarafın İddiaları ve Talepleri
Şikayetçi şikayet dilekçesinde;
• Şikayetçi 1992 yılında Compart Systemhaus GmbH ticaret unvanı ile kurulmuştur.
• 2000 yılından bugüne dek Almanya, Kuzey Amerika, İspanya/Portekiz olmak üzere 3 bölgesel coğrafyada iştirakleri
ile var olan COMPART AG adı altında “doküman yönetimi” işlerini yürütmektedir.
• Şikayetçi; COMPART markasını
o Almanya’da 1086545 numara ile Eylül 11, 1984 in tarihinde 09, 16 ve 42. sınıflarda;
o Almanya’da 30546409 numara ile Ağustos 3, 2005 in tarihinde 09 ve 42. sınıflarda
o Almanya’da 30546410.8 numara ile Ağustos 3, 2005 in tarihinde 09 ve 42. sınıflarda
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
13
14. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
o 884004 Uluslararası tescil numarası ile 09 ve 42. Sınıfarda Şubat 3, 2006 tarihinde İsviçre, Romanya, Norveç,
Turkiye, ABD ve Avrupa Biriliği’nde
tescil ettirmiştir.
• Şikayetçi COMPART markasını ayrıca çok sayıda ülkede tescil ettirmiştir.
• Uyuşmazlık konusu alan adı ilk kez 1996 yılında Comp Art Associates of Louisville, USA tarafından tescil (kayıt)
edilmiş ve şirket unvanının değiştiği 2001 yılına kadar “grafik tasarım, pazarlama ve reklam tanıtım” hizmetleri için
kullanılmıştır.
• Alan adı 2001 yılında Domain Deluxe in Hong Kong tarafından tescil edilmiş, 19 Temmuz 2004 tarihinden sonra
WhoIs veri tabanında “gizlilik kaydı - privacy shield” koyulmuştur.
• Şikayet Edilen taraf olan Vertical Axis, Inc., 3. kişilere ait marka ve alan adlarını tescil ettirerek para kazanmak
amacında olan bir firma olarak bilinmektedir ve daha önce 27 kez alan adı uyuşmazlığı prosedürlerinde şikayet
edilen olarak yer almış ve 12 dava lehine sonuçlanmıştır.
• Şikayet Edilen, uyuşmazlığa konu “Compart.com” alan adını, üçüncü kişilerin “yazılımlar da dahil olmak üzere
ürünleri”ni içeren sitelere link (bağlantı) veren bir “alan adı park sitesi - domain parking website” olarak
kullanmaktadır.
• Şikayetçi, Eylül 2008’de Şikayet Edilene, alan adının kendisine transferi için 7,000 USD teklif etmiş, bu teklif
reddedilmiş, Şubat 2009’da Şikayetçi DomainBrokers.com’dan Şikayet Edilen adına alan adının transferi için 48,000
US$ talep edildiği mesajını almıştır.
• Uyuşmazlığa konu alan adı/“Compart.com”, yüksek ayırt ediciliği olan COMPART ibaresini içeren Şikayetçi markası
ile karıştırılma ihtimali yaratacak şekilde benzerdir. Şikayetçi “markada ilave şekil unsurlarının bulunmasının” alan
adı ile marka arasındaki karıştırılma ihtimalini, dolayısıyla, benzerliği ortadan kaldırmaya yeterli olmadığına ilişkin
birçok UDRP karar örneği sunmuştur.
• Şikayet Edilenin uyuşmazlık konusu alan adını kullanmak için herhangi bir hakkı ya da yasal menfaati yoktur.
Şikayetçi, Şikayet Edilene COMPART markasını kullanmak için lisans veya izin ya da COMPART markası veya onunla
ilişkili bir ismin alan adı olarak tescil edilmesine yönelik olarak herhangi bir izin vermemiştir.
• Şikayet Edilen, uyuşmazlık konusu alan adını “yazılımlar da içeren çeşitli ürünlere ait bilgileri” arayan internet
kullanıcılarına yönelik olarak 3. kişilerin web sitelerine linkler vermek suretiyle her tuşlamada (clik) belirli miktarda
para kazandıran bir site olarak kullanmaktadır. Bu kullanım Politika’nın 4 (c) (i) maddesi uyarınca iyi niyetli bir
kullanım olarak kabul edilemez.
• Şikayet Edilenin, Şikayetçinin yüksek ayırt ediciliği olan ve geniş çevrelerce bilinen COMPART markasını uyuşmazlık
konusu alan adında kullanması için hukuki ve ticari olan veya olmayan herhangi bir iş faaliyeti de sözkonusu
değildir. Dolayısıyla, Şikayet Edilen kötü niyetlidir.
• Bunların yanısıra uyuşmazlık konusu alan adı altındaki site, Şikayetçinin rakiplerinin sitelerine örneğin
<nextag.co.uk>, <software4students.co.uk>, <31touchdownloads.com>, <ascentive.com> sitelerine bağlantı
vermekte ve reklamlarını içermektedir.
• Şikayet Edilen, Şikayetçi veya Şikayetçinin markası hakkında bilgisi olmasaydı şikayetçinin rakibi olan yazılım
firmalarının yazılım ürünlerine sitesinde yer vermezdi.
• Şikayet Edilen, uyuşmazlık konusu alan adını tescil ettirirken Şikayetçiyi veya Şikayetçinin markasını özellikle
bilmiyor olsaydı dahi araştırması gerekir idi. Champagne Lanson v. Development Services/MailPlanet.com, Inc.,
WIPO Case No. D2006-0006, <lanson.com>) kararında da belirtildiği gibi “bilerek göz yumma - willful blindness”
kötü niyetin göstergesidir.
iddialarına yer vermiş, deliller sunmuş ve sonuç olarak uyuşmazlık konusu alan adının kendisine transferini talep
etmiştir.
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
14
15. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Şikayet Edilen tarafın Savunmaları ve Talepleri
Şikayet Edilen, cevap dilekçesinde;
• Bu olay bir “karşı alan adı korsanlığı - reverse domain name hijacking” olayıdır.
• Şikayetçi, taraflar arasında bir dizi görüşme sonunda varılan 20,000 US$ olan teklifi kabul etmeyip alan adını satın
almasının mümkün olamayacağını anladığı zaman bu davayı açmıştır. Şikayetçi, şikayet dilekçesinde 7,000 US$ ilk
tekliften sonra, kendisinin 12,000 US$ ve tekrar 20,000 US$ teklifler verdiğini dilekçesinde belirtmemiştir.
• COMPART kelimesini içeren alan adı genel sözlük anlamı itibariyle “seçip ayırmak, kısımlara ayırmak” anlamında
olduğundan Şikayet Edilenin bu adı kullanmasında meşru bir menfaati vardır.
• Şikayet Edilen, uyuşmazlık konusu alan adını “alan adı park hizmeti” veren HitFarm.com vasıtasıyla kullanmaktadır.
Şikayette belirtilenin aksine; şikayet edilen uyuşmazlık konusu alan adı altındaki sitede, Şikayetçinin rakiplerinin
yazılım ve diğer ürünlerinin reklamlarına yer verilmemektedir. Şikayet Edilen bunu kanıtlamak üzere daha çok
otomobil ürünleri ve genel mal ve hizmetler sunan linkleri gösteren deliller sunmuştur.
• Şikayet Edilen COMPART kelimesinin 3. kişiler tarafından kullanıldığını göstermek üzere google’da 899,000 hit
sonucunu gösteren deliller sunmuştur. Buna ek olarak Almanya ve ABD’de COMPART kelimesini içeren çok sayıda
marka tescili bulunmaktadır.
• Şikayet Edilen uyuşmazlık konusu alan adının tescili ve kullanımında kötü niyetli değildir. Tasviri bir kelime eğer bir
markadan kazanç sağlamak amacıyla tescil edilir ise o zaman kötü niyetten bahsedilebilir. Burada bu durumu
kanıtlayan herhangi bir delil yoktur. Zira Şikayet Edilen COMPART ismini genel bir kelime olduğu için tescil
ettirmiştir. Şikayet Edilen alan adını tescil ettirdiği tarih olan 4 Haziran 2005 tarihinde Şikayetçiden hiçbir şekilde
haberdar değildir. Şikayetçi ABD’de COMPART marka tescil başvurusunu 3 Şubat 2006 yani şikayet edilenin alan
adını tescil ettirmesinden 8 ay sonra gerçekleştirmiştir. Şikayet Edilenin alan adını tescil ettiği tarihte Şikayetçi’nin
Almanya’da tescilli markası olmasına rağmen, Şikayet Edilenin dünyanın her ülkesinde marka tescili olup
olmadığını araştırmasının gerekmeyeceği çok iyi bilinmektedir..
savunmalarını ifade etmiş, deliller sunmuş ve sonuç olarak Şikayetçi tarafın taleplerinin reddedilmesini talep etmiştir.
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
15
16. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Complainants’ Attorney
Att. Ahu GÜNEYLİ
Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain
İstanbul Patent and Trademark Consultancy Ltd., İstanbul
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
Graduating as a valedictorian from Cag University Law School in 2004, she worked as a research assistant in Criminal Law Department at the same
institute. She was granted "Fulbright Scholarship" and got her LL.M degree on “Intellectual Property and Technology Law" from Washington University
in St. Louis School of Law, in 2007. Ahu is currently working at Istanbul Patent Trademark Consultancy Ltd. and represents her clients before
international dispute resolution organizations such as WIPO, NAF, The Czech Arbitration Court etc. for domain name dispute resolutions while working
as a legal counsel to protect her clients’ intellectual property rights throughout the world.
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
16
17. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
17
18. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
18
19. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
19
20. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
20
21. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
21
22. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Respondents’ Attorney
Att. Emre Kerim YARDIMCI
Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain Name
Deriş Attorney at Law Partnership, İstanbul
Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
22
23. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
23
24. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
24
25. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
25
26. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
26
27. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Respondents’ Attorney
Att. Emre Kerim YARDIMCI
Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain Name
Deriş Attorney at Law Partnership, İstanbul
Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
27
28. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
28
29. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
29
30. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
30
31. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
31
32. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
32
33. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
33
34. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Complainants’ Attorney
Att. Ahu GÜNEYLİ
Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain Name
İstanbul Patent and Trademark Consultancy Ltd., İstanbul
Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
Graduating as a valedictorian from Cag University Law School in 2004, she worked as a research assistant in Criminal Law Department at the same
institute. She was granted "Fulbright Scholarship" and got her LL.M degree on “Intellectual Property and Technology Law" from Washington University in
St. Louis School of Law, in 2007. Ahu is currently working at Istanbul Patent Trademark Consultancy Ltd. and represents her clients before international
dispute resolution organizations such as WIPO, NAF, The Czech Arbitration Court etc. for domain name dispute resolutions while working as a legal counsel
to protect her clients’ intellectual property rights throughout the world.
1 2
3 4
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
34
35. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
5 6
7 8
9 10
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
35
36. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
11 12
13 14
15 16
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
36
37. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
17 18
19 20
21 22
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
37
38. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
23 24
25 26
27 28
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
38
39. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
29 30
31
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
39
40. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
Respondents’ Attorney
Att. Emre Kerim YARDIMCI
Resolution of the Internet Domain Name Dispute by Uniform Domain
Deriş Attorney at Law Partnership, İstanbul
Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) before WIPO
1 2
3 4
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
40
41. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
5 6
7 8
9 10
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
41
42. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
11 12
13 14
15 16
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
42
43. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
17 18
19 20
21 22
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
43
44. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
23 24
25 26
27 28
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
44
45. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
29 30
31 32
33 34
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
45
46. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
35 36
37 38
39 40
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
46
47. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
41 42
43 44
45 46
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
47
48. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
47 48
49 50
51 52
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
48
49. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
53 54
55 56
57 58
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
49
50. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
59 60
61 62
63 64
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
50
51. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
65 66
67 68
69 70
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
51
52. Fikri Mülkiyet Hakları Koruma Derneği │ 2nci Fikri Haklar Hukuk Semineri
Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights │ 2nd Intellectual Property Law Seminar
❷❽❷❾⓿❻❷⓿❶❷ │ The Marmara Taksim, Istanbul │❹ Mock WIPO Case -UDRP Arbitration on Domain Name Dispute
52