The document discusses licit narcotics production in Australia, which is based on poppy cultivation restricted to Tasmania. It analyzes the industry through the legal geographic lenses of the "nomosphere" and "topology" to understand the spatial workings and power dynamics. The production has constituted distinct new entities and relationships through differentiating between morphine and thebaine alkaloids, enabling Australia to continue leading global licit narcotics production.
Objetivos:
Vivemos um momento efervescente no Brasil e no mundo. Momento de crise, instabilidade política e econômica, eventos drásticos acontecendo diariamente e a pergunta que se faz é: como desenvolver sua liderança, levar uma vida equilibrada e ser feliz? Nesta palestra, Luiz Cláudio Binato mostrará que isso está ao seu alcance, mais próximo do que pode parecer e que depende somente de uma pessoa obter essa condição: você.
Palestrante:
Adm. Luiz Cláudio Binato
Administrador com especialização em Qualidade Total, Engenharia Econômica e Marketing Estratégico, mestrado em Estratégia e doutorado em Liderança. Atuou como executivo sênior em empresas como Caixa Econômica Federal, Embratel/BrasilCenter, Teleperformance do Brasil e Grupo Bureau Veritas. Professor de programas de MBA da FGV, Fundador e Diretor Executivo do INSTIAD Human & Business School onde atua em Desenvolvimento Humano, Educas Executiva e Estratégia Organizacional.
Oficina IV: Marketing de Busca: como alavancar sua marca na internet - Ciclo ...Pedro Cordier
CICLO COMUNICAÇÃO DIGITAL E MOBILIDADE
Oficina IV - Marketing de Busca: como alavancar sua marca na internet
Facilitador: PEDRO CORDIER
Realização: Trespontos - Rede de Socialização do Conhecimento
IBM i Monitoring by the Dashboard LightHelpSystems
What if you could see IBM i system performance and application statuses across all partitions in a single screen? What if you only had to look in one place to see what’s happening now, what happened in the past few hours, or what happened last week or last month?
Graphical monitoring provides greater visibility, making it easier to manage your IBM i systems and applications. Ah, paradise at last!
Let our experts demonstrate how easy it is to build Robot Monitor dashboards that allow you to manage your IBM i environment with unprecedented detail and clarity. You’ll learn how to:
-Configure single- or multi-system views
-Add real-time performance widgets
-Include custom-written SQL widget data
-Show multiple metrics in a single widget
-Provide monitored data for any date or time range
-Highlight monthly summarized metrics
Get a good look at the wealth of information provided at a single glance using Robot Monitor dashboards—check it out today!
Objetivos:
Vivemos um momento efervescente no Brasil e no mundo. Momento de crise, instabilidade política e econômica, eventos drásticos acontecendo diariamente e a pergunta que se faz é: como desenvolver sua liderança, levar uma vida equilibrada e ser feliz? Nesta palestra, Luiz Cláudio Binato mostrará que isso está ao seu alcance, mais próximo do que pode parecer e que depende somente de uma pessoa obter essa condição: você.
Palestrante:
Adm. Luiz Cláudio Binato
Administrador com especialização em Qualidade Total, Engenharia Econômica e Marketing Estratégico, mestrado em Estratégia e doutorado em Liderança. Atuou como executivo sênior em empresas como Caixa Econômica Federal, Embratel/BrasilCenter, Teleperformance do Brasil e Grupo Bureau Veritas. Professor de programas de MBA da FGV, Fundador e Diretor Executivo do INSTIAD Human & Business School onde atua em Desenvolvimento Humano, Educas Executiva e Estratégia Organizacional.
Oficina IV: Marketing de Busca: como alavancar sua marca na internet - Ciclo ...Pedro Cordier
CICLO COMUNICAÇÃO DIGITAL E MOBILIDADE
Oficina IV - Marketing de Busca: como alavancar sua marca na internet
Facilitador: PEDRO CORDIER
Realização: Trespontos - Rede de Socialização do Conhecimento
IBM i Monitoring by the Dashboard LightHelpSystems
What if you could see IBM i system performance and application statuses across all partitions in a single screen? What if you only had to look in one place to see what’s happening now, what happened in the past few hours, or what happened last week or last month?
Graphical monitoring provides greater visibility, making it easier to manage your IBM i systems and applications. Ah, paradise at last!
Let our experts demonstrate how easy it is to build Robot Monitor dashboards that allow you to manage your IBM i environment with unprecedented detail and clarity. You’ll learn how to:
-Configure single- or multi-system views
-Add real-time performance widgets
-Include custom-written SQL widget data
-Show multiple metrics in a single widget
-Provide monitored data for any date or time range
-Highlight monthly summarized metrics
Get a good look at the wealth of information provided at a single glance using Robot Monitor dashboards—check it out today!
Growing Physical, Social and Cognitive Capacity: Engaging with Natural Environments
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad Three Faces of DeceitDanie.docxinfantkimber
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad: Three Faces of Deceit
Daniel N. Jones
University of Texas at El Paso
Delroy L. Paulhus
University of British Columbia
Although all 3 of the Dark Triad members are predisposed to engage in exploitative interpersonal
behavior, their motivations and tactics vary. Here we explore their distinctive dynamics with 5 behavioral
studies of dishonesty (total N � 1,750). All 3 traits predicted cheating on a coin-flipping task when there
was little risk of being caught (Study 1). Only psychopathy predicted cheating when punishment was a
serious risk (Study 2). Machiavellian individuals also cheated under high risk— but only if they were
ego-depleted (Study 3). Both psychopathy and Machiavellianism predicted cheating when it required an
intentional lie (Study 4). Finally, those high in narcissism showed the highest levels of self-deceptive bias
(Study 5). In sum, duplicitous behavior is far from uniform across the Dark Triad members. The
frequency and nature of their dishonesty is moderated by 3 contextual factors: level of risk, ego depletion,
and target of deception. This evidence for distinctive forms of duplicity helps clarify differences among
the Dark Triad members as well as illuminating different shades of dishonesty.
Keywords: cheating, Dark Triad, deception, honesty
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139.supp
Concern about others’ honesty is among the strongest situational
influences on social behavior (Rauthmann et al., 2014), and hon-
esty attribution is the single most influential factor in person
perception (Paunonen, 2006). However, the measurement of hon-
esty as a trait is characterized by a fractured history reaching back
to Hartshorne and May (1928). After assessing diverse forms of
dishonest behaviors (e.g., lying, cheating, stealing) on large sam-
ples of children, those seminal researchers dismissed the notion of
a unitary trait construct. When properly interpreted, however, their
data do indicate significant convergence across various forms of
duplicity (Burton, 1963). Such tendencies also tend to converge at
the virtuous pole (Jayawickreme, Meindl, Helzer, Furr, & Fleeson,
2014). In contemporary personality research, Ashton and Lee
(2001) have been relentless in confirming this trait notion by
isolating an Honesty-Humility (H-H) factor in their HEXACO
model of personality. The incremental value of adding this factor
in the prediction of personal integrity appears to be well supported
(e.g., Lee, Ashton, Morrison, Cordery, & Dunlop, 2010; Spain,
Harms, & Lebreton, 2014).
Under the broad umbrella of the H-H factor, three narrower
traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy— have re-
ceived extensive theoretical and empirical attention. Paulhus and
Williams (2002) coined the term Dark Triad to encourage re-
searchers to study these three traits as a constellation.1 Their
rationale was that only a concurrent analysis can clarify any unique
contributions of the tria.
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad Three Faces of DeceitDanie.docxmadlynplamondon
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad: Three Faces of Deceit
Daniel N. Jones
University of Texas at El Paso
Delroy L. Paulhus
University of British Columbia
Although all 3 of the Dark Triad members are predisposed to engage in exploitative interpersonal
behavior, their motivations and tactics vary. Here we explore their distinctive dynamics with 5 behavioral
studies of dishonesty (total N � 1,750). All 3 traits predicted cheating on a coin-flipping task when there
was little risk of being caught (Study 1). Only psychopathy predicted cheating when punishment was a
serious risk (Study 2). Machiavellian individuals also cheated under high risk— but only if they were
ego-depleted (Study 3). Both psychopathy and Machiavellianism predicted cheating when it required an
intentional lie (Study 4). Finally, those high in narcissism showed the highest levels of self-deceptive bias
(Study 5). In sum, duplicitous behavior is far from uniform across the Dark Triad members. The
frequency and nature of their dishonesty is moderated by 3 contextual factors: level of risk, ego depletion,
and target of deception. This evidence for distinctive forms of duplicity helps clarify differences among
the Dark Triad members as well as illuminating different shades of dishonesty.
Keywords: cheating, Dark Triad, deception, honesty
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139.supp
Concern about others’ honesty is among the strongest situational
influences on social behavior (Rauthmann et al., 2014), and hon-
esty attribution is the single most influential factor in person
perception (Paunonen, 2006). However, the measurement of hon-
esty as a trait is characterized by a fractured history reaching back
to Hartshorne and May (1928). After assessing diverse forms of
dishonest behaviors (e.g., lying, cheating, stealing) on large sam-
ples of children, those seminal researchers dismissed the notion of
a unitary trait construct. When properly interpreted, however, their
data do indicate significant convergence across various forms of
duplicity (Burton, 1963). Such tendencies also tend to converge at
the virtuous pole (Jayawickreme, Meindl, Helzer, Furr, & Fleeson,
2014). In contemporary personality research, Ashton and Lee
(2001) have been relentless in confirming this trait notion by
isolating an Honesty-Humility (H-H) factor in their HEXACO
model of personality. The incremental value of adding this factor
in the prediction of personal integrity appears to be well supported
(e.g., Lee, Ashton, Morrison, Cordery, & Dunlop, 2010; Spain,
Harms, & Lebreton, 2014).
Under the broad umbrella of the H-H factor, three narrower
traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy— have re-
ceived extensive theoretical and empirical attention. Paulhus and
Williams (2002) coined the term Dark Triad to encourage re-
searchers to study these three traits as a constellation.1 Their
rationale was that only a concurrent analysis can clarify any unique
contributions of the tria ...
SOC 2010, Cultural Geography 1 Course Learning Outajoy21
SOC 2010, Cultural Geography 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Discuss key concepts in human geography.
1.1 Identify different types of regions.
1.2 Identify different types of spatial diffusion.
1.3 Recognize key terms describing human geographical concepts involving space, place, region,
and culture.
2. Discuss the impact of globalization on society.
2.1 Discuss security risks of globalization.
Course/Unit
Learning Outcomes
Learning Activity
1.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Unit I Assessment
1.2
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Unit I Assessment
1.3
Unit Lesson
Videos in Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Chapter 2, pp. 30-32
Unit I Assessment
2.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Article: “Technology and National Security: The United States at a Critical
Crossroads”
Unit I Assessment
Required Unit Resources
Chapter 1: What is Human Geography?
Chapter 2: Globalization and Cultural Geography, pp. 30–32
In order to access the following resource, click the link below.
Kadtke, J., & Wharton, J. (2018). Technology and national security: The United States at a critical crossroads.
Defense Horizons, (84), 1–8.
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
t=true&db=tsh&AN=128867940&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Unit Lesson
Welcome to the Unit I Lesson. This lesson will highlight and expand upon some of the major concepts
presented in the Unit I readings on human geographic concepts and how globalization connects to
UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
Introduction to Human Geography
and Globalization
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tsh&AN=128867940&site=ehost-live&scope=site
SOC 2010, Cultural Geography 2
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
human geography. The lesson will contain examples, questions to think about, and videos to help explain
this unit’s material.
What is Human Geography?
When you think of the word geography, you often think of a map or globe. Geography is much more than just
maps. Geography has two main branches. The first is physical geography, which focuses on environmental
dynamics. The second is human geography. Greiner (2018) defines human geography as “a branch of
geography centered on the study of people, places, spatial variation in human activities, and the relationship
between people and the environment” (p. 2). For this class, we will focus on human geography.
Human Geographic Concept of Cultural Ecology: Past and Present Approaches
An important part of the study of human geography is cultural ecology. This is the study of the relationship
between the natural environment and culture. We will study this more in Unit IV. The course textbook
presents several approaches in the study of cultural ecology to explain the relationship between nature and
man. These include environment ...
The Perspective and Association of Geography with Environment and Societypaperpublications3
Abstract: The study examines the relationship of the discipline of Geography with conceptual terms of Environment and society. Geography is seen as a spatial science, majorly concerned with spatial analysis, of how and why things differ from place to place and how observable spatial pattern evolved through time on the surface of the earth. The study adopts a survey of literature as its methodology. It is observable that every society has its individual physical and cultural attributes that distinguishing it from other societies; thus giving it unique character, potential and location. And it is found that in society cultural traits are more pronounced in changing the natural phenomena of the environment. The Environment is better understood when broken to its component: atmosphere, hydrosphere lithosphere and biosphere. Environment has all that is needed to sustain the society and all that is required for life sustenance. It provides the setting with which human action occurs, its shapes but not dictate, how people live in the society as well as their resource base. However, how resources are perceived and utilized is culturally conditioned in society. And virtually every human activity leaves its imprint on the environment. Environment and society form the laboratory for geographic operation. And its spheres form the space which is the major concern in geography and the concept of society introduces the important factor of culture which greatly has direct impact on the environment. The socio-cultural content of the society is influenced by the environment where it locates and the society modifies the content of the environment. There are interconnection between the environment and society which purposely produces spatial patterns with their hidden mechanism of spatial process, accessibility and connectively in addition to idea of location and distance. Advance level of interaction has produced globalization which has accelerated greater spatial diffusion of idea and material resources in the world. The major role of geography is to ensure harmonious spatial organization and inter relationship between and among societies on one hand and between society and its environment on the other. Thus, this is being pursued in geography through its traditions: Earth science, cultural-environment, the location (space), the areal analysis and various paradigms and spatial techniques. It is therefore recommended that for speedy development in developing nations particularly at combating the myriad of environmental challenges and appropriate exploitation and utilization of environmental resources, the spatial tool should be adopted as contained in the discipline of Geography.
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as Evo.docxrjoseph5
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as "Evolutionarily, endangered species preservation in the form of fossils and other forms indicates preservation of culture just as argued in the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 whereby, organisms ought to be preserved even after death to mark their existence and evolution over the years." How do fossils apply to the ESA? And how can organisms be preserved after death, except in the case of museum specimens? From now on, please focus on explaining the ideas of our authors in your own words, rather than trying to sound "academic" or overly-complicated.
--
For next time, focus on answering the specific questions that are asked in the assignment. Rather than including information that appears to be from external sources, such as the genetically-oriented definition of evolution--which you NEED to cite to avoid committing plagiarism--this assignment should focus on the 3 Barrow rationales and relevant links from the Kingsland article.
Ecologists have long endeavored to improve ecologi-cal literacy. This goal goes beyond informing stu-
dents about environmental issues: one must excite their
interest in ecological science, regardless of whether or
not they intend to pursue the more advanced technical
and mathematical education that modern ecology
requires (Golley 1998). The challenge is to motivate
people to tackle difficult ecological problems. Fifty
years ago, G Evelyn Hutchinson (1953) observed that,
while students did not hesitate to dive into complicated
activities concerned with “electronic amplifiers and
with the explosive combustion of hydrocarbons”, they
traditionally viewed the majority of complex activities
as boring duties. “What we have to do”, Hutchinson
wrote, “is to show by example that a very large number
of diversified, complicated, and often extremely diffi-
cult constructive activities are capable of giving enor-
mous pleasure”. The kind of pleasure that Hutchinson
was thinking of involved the formulation of theory,
discovery, and problem-solving. Repairing the bios-
phere and the human societies within it, he believed,
ought to be as much fun as repairing the family car.
While people today are better informed about environ-
mental problems , engaging students in ecological
research and conveying what ecology is about to the
public is still challenging because of the complexity of
the science.
I will draw on historical examples to illustrate ways of
thinking that are characteristic of an ecological
approach to the study of nature. My list is by no means
complete. I touch only lightly on the classics of the eco-
logical canon, which are discussed elsewhere (Real and
Brown 1991; Keller and Golley 2000). Instead, I include
some lesser known examples from medical science to
highlight different contexts in which thinking ecologi-
cally has been important. Students should appreciate
that this kind of thinking integrates methods derived
from many fields of science an.
Whether you are using the works of Lenski, Svalastoga, Sorokin, .docxhelzerpatrina
Whether you are using the works of Lenski, Svalastoga, Sorokin, or the data using Brazil as an example, please use the passage to support your own interpretation of how social stratification manifests itself in American society, and how it may work to the benefit or detriment of society as a whole.
Societal Stratification
ARCHIBALD O. HALLER
Encyclopedia of Sociology. Vol. 4. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan Reference USA, 2001. p2864-2874.
Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2001 Macmillan Reference USA, COPYRIGHT 2006 Gale, COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning
Listen
Page 2864
SOCIETAL STRATIFICATION
Societal stratification phenomena are the relatively enduring, hierarchically ordered relationships of power among the units of which society is composed. The smallest units are adults, gainfully employed men and/or women, nuclear families, or sometimes extended families or households. Such units are ordered from highest to lowest in terms of power: political power, acquisitional power, the power of prestige, and the power of informational standing. Everybody experiences stratification every day, although a person often notices it only in the sense that some people seem better or worse off than he or she is. Social thinkers, powerful people, and revolutionaries have always been especially concerned with stratification.
Page 2865 | Top of Article
Secure knowledge of the varying forms stratification structures may take is important because of the effects those structures have on many aspects of human experience, such as people's dreams of a better life, efforts to improve their situations, strivings for success, fear of failure, sympathy for the less fortunate, envy of others' good fortune, and even feelings about revolution.
A complete understanding of stratification requires several kinds of knowledge: first, what stratification structures consist of and how they vary; second, the individual and collective consequences of the different states of those structures; and third, the factors that make stratification structures change. This article reviews current thinking on the first of these elements.
HISTORY: CLASSICAL THEORY
Two different lines of thought inform modern theory on societal stratification. One is classical theory; concerned with political power and privilege, it employs historical evidence. The other is the empirical tradition, which deals with systematic data on stratification as it exists contemporarily. Present-day theory of the behavior of stratification phenomena can be traced to Karl Marx's challenge to the manufacturing and financial elites of his day. Behind his concerns and those of the working class for which he was Europe's chief spokesman for many years lay the great economic and political upheavals of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
The American and French revolutions and their aftermath culminated in legislation that made adults in many countries equal before the law. The related wave of emancipation of slaves and serf ...
Growing Physical, Social and Cognitive Capacity: Engaging with Natural Environments
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214 ~
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079 ~
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159 ~
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348 ~
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden =
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440 ~
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide =
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110 ~
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad Three Faces of DeceitDanie.docxinfantkimber
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad: Three Faces of Deceit
Daniel N. Jones
University of Texas at El Paso
Delroy L. Paulhus
University of British Columbia
Although all 3 of the Dark Triad members are predisposed to engage in exploitative interpersonal
behavior, their motivations and tactics vary. Here we explore their distinctive dynamics with 5 behavioral
studies of dishonesty (total N � 1,750). All 3 traits predicted cheating on a coin-flipping task when there
was little risk of being caught (Study 1). Only psychopathy predicted cheating when punishment was a
serious risk (Study 2). Machiavellian individuals also cheated under high risk— but only if they were
ego-depleted (Study 3). Both psychopathy and Machiavellianism predicted cheating when it required an
intentional lie (Study 4). Finally, those high in narcissism showed the highest levels of self-deceptive bias
(Study 5). In sum, duplicitous behavior is far from uniform across the Dark Triad members. The
frequency and nature of their dishonesty is moderated by 3 contextual factors: level of risk, ego depletion,
and target of deception. This evidence for distinctive forms of duplicity helps clarify differences among
the Dark Triad members as well as illuminating different shades of dishonesty.
Keywords: cheating, Dark Triad, deception, honesty
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139.supp
Concern about others’ honesty is among the strongest situational
influences on social behavior (Rauthmann et al., 2014), and hon-
esty attribution is the single most influential factor in person
perception (Paunonen, 2006). However, the measurement of hon-
esty as a trait is characterized by a fractured history reaching back
to Hartshorne and May (1928). After assessing diverse forms of
dishonest behaviors (e.g., lying, cheating, stealing) on large sam-
ples of children, those seminal researchers dismissed the notion of
a unitary trait construct. When properly interpreted, however, their
data do indicate significant convergence across various forms of
duplicity (Burton, 1963). Such tendencies also tend to converge at
the virtuous pole (Jayawickreme, Meindl, Helzer, Furr, & Fleeson,
2014). In contemporary personality research, Ashton and Lee
(2001) have been relentless in confirming this trait notion by
isolating an Honesty-Humility (H-H) factor in their HEXACO
model of personality. The incremental value of adding this factor
in the prediction of personal integrity appears to be well supported
(e.g., Lee, Ashton, Morrison, Cordery, & Dunlop, 2010; Spain,
Harms, & Lebreton, 2014).
Under the broad umbrella of the H-H factor, three narrower
traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy— have re-
ceived extensive theoretical and empirical attention. Paulhus and
Williams (2002) coined the term Dark Triad to encourage re-
searchers to study these three traits as a constellation.1 Their
rationale was that only a concurrent analysis can clarify any unique
contributions of the tria.
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad Three Faces of DeceitDanie.docxmadlynplamondon
Duplicity Among the Dark Triad: Three Faces of Deceit
Daniel N. Jones
University of Texas at El Paso
Delroy L. Paulhus
University of British Columbia
Although all 3 of the Dark Triad members are predisposed to engage in exploitative interpersonal
behavior, their motivations and tactics vary. Here we explore their distinctive dynamics with 5 behavioral
studies of dishonesty (total N � 1,750). All 3 traits predicted cheating on a coin-flipping task when there
was little risk of being caught (Study 1). Only psychopathy predicted cheating when punishment was a
serious risk (Study 2). Machiavellian individuals also cheated under high risk— but only if they were
ego-depleted (Study 3). Both psychopathy and Machiavellianism predicted cheating when it required an
intentional lie (Study 4). Finally, those high in narcissism showed the highest levels of self-deceptive bias
(Study 5). In sum, duplicitous behavior is far from uniform across the Dark Triad members. The
frequency and nature of their dishonesty is moderated by 3 contextual factors: level of risk, ego depletion,
and target of deception. This evidence for distinctive forms of duplicity helps clarify differences among
the Dark Triad members as well as illuminating different shades of dishonesty.
Keywords: cheating, Dark Triad, deception, honesty
Supplemental materials: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139.supp
Concern about others’ honesty is among the strongest situational
influences on social behavior (Rauthmann et al., 2014), and hon-
esty attribution is the single most influential factor in person
perception (Paunonen, 2006). However, the measurement of hon-
esty as a trait is characterized by a fractured history reaching back
to Hartshorne and May (1928). After assessing diverse forms of
dishonest behaviors (e.g., lying, cheating, stealing) on large sam-
ples of children, those seminal researchers dismissed the notion of
a unitary trait construct. When properly interpreted, however, their
data do indicate significant convergence across various forms of
duplicity (Burton, 1963). Such tendencies also tend to converge at
the virtuous pole (Jayawickreme, Meindl, Helzer, Furr, & Fleeson,
2014). In contemporary personality research, Ashton and Lee
(2001) have been relentless in confirming this trait notion by
isolating an Honesty-Humility (H-H) factor in their HEXACO
model of personality. The incremental value of adding this factor
in the prediction of personal integrity appears to be well supported
(e.g., Lee, Ashton, Morrison, Cordery, & Dunlop, 2010; Spain,
Harms, & Lebreton, 2014).
Under the broad umbrella of the H-H factor, three narrower
traits—narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy— have re-
ceived extensive theoretical and empirical attention. Paulhus and
Williams (2002) coined the term Dark Triad to encourage re-
searchers to study these three traits as a constellation.1 Their
rationale was that only a concurrent analysis can clarify any unique
contributions of the tria ...
SOC 2010, Cultural Geography 1 Course Learning Outajoy21
SOC 2010, Cultural Geography 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit I
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Discuss key concepts in human geography.
1.1 Identify different types of regions.
1.2 Identify different types of spatial diffusion.
1.3 Recognize key terms describing human geographical concepts involving space, place, region,
and culture.
2. Discuss the impact of globalization on society.
2.1 Discuss security risks of globalization.
Course/Unit
Learning Outcomes
Learning Activity
1.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Unit I Assessment
1.2
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Unit I Assessment
1.3
Unit Lesson
Videos in Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Chapter 2, pp. 30-32
Unit I Assessment
2.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 1
Article: “Technology and National Security: The United States at a Critical
Crossroads”
Unit I Assessment
Required Unit Resources
Chapter 1: What is Human Geography?
Chapter 2: Globalization and Cultural Geography, pp. 30–32
In order to access the following resource, click the link below.
Kadtke, J., & Wharton, J. (2018). Technology and national security: The United States at a critical crossroads.
Defense Horizons, (84), 1–8.
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direc
t=true&db=tsh&AN=128867940&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Unit Lesson
Welcome to the Unit I Lesson. This lesson will highlight and expand upon some of the major concepts
presented in the Unit I readings on human geographic concepts and how globalization connects to
UNIT I STUDY GUIDE
Introduction to Human Geography
and Globalization
https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=tsh&AN=128867940&site=ehost-live&scope=site
SOC 2010, Cultural Geography 2
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
human geography. The lesson will contain examples, questions to think about, and videos to help explain
this unit’s material.
What is Human Geography?
When you think of the word geography, you often think of a map or globe. Geography is much more than just
maps. Geography has two main branches. The first is physical geography, which focuses on environmental
dynamics. The second is human geography. Greiner (2018) defines human geography as “a branch of
geography centered on the study of people, places, spatial variation in human activities, and the relationship
between people and the environment” (p. 2). For this class, we will focus on human geography.
Human Geographic Concept of Cultural Ecology: Past and Present Approaches
An important part of the study of human geography is cultural ecology. This is the study of the relationship
between the natural environment and culture. We will study this more in Unit IV. The course textbook
presents several approaches in the study of cultural ecology to explain the relationship between nature and
man. These include environment ...
The Perspective and Association of Geography with Environment and Societypaperpublications3
Abstract: The study examines the relationship of the discipline of Geography with conceptual terms of Environment and society. Geography is seen as a spatial science, majorly concerned with spatial analysis, of how and why things differ from place to place and how observable spatial pattern evolved through time on the surface of the earth. The study adopts a survey of literature as its methodology. It is observable that every society has its individual physical and cultural attributes that distinguishing it from other societies; thus giving it unique character, potential and location. And it is found that in society cultural traits are more pronounced in changing the natural phenomena of the environment. The Environment is better understood when broken to its component: atmosphere, hydrosphere lithosphere and biosphere. Environment has all that is needed to sustain the society and all that is required for life sustenance. It provides the setting with which human action occurs, its shapes but not dictate, how people live in the society as well as their resource base. However, how resources are perceived and utilized is culturally conditioned in society. And virtually every human activity leaves its imprint on the environment. Environment and society form the laboratory for geographic operation. And its spheres form the space which is the major concern in geography and the concept of society introduces the important factor of culture which greatly has direct impact on the environment. The socio-cultural content of the society is influenced by the environment where it locates and the society modifies the content of the environment. There are interconnection between the environment and society which purposely produces spatial patterns with their hidden mechanism of spatial process, accessibility and connectively in addition to idea of location and distance. Advance level of interaction has produced globalization which has accelerated greater spatial diffusion of idea and material resources in the world. The major role of geography is to ensure harmonious spatial organization and inter relationship between and among societies on one hand and between society and its environment on the other. Thus, this is being pursued in geography through its traditions: Earth science, cultural-environment, the location (space), the areal analysis and various paradigms and spatial techniques. It is therefore recommended that for speedy development in developing nations particularly at combating the myriad of environmental challenges and appropriate exploitation and utilization of environmental resources, the spatial tool should be adopted as contained in the discipline of Geography.
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as Evo.docxrjoseph5
still contains sentences that are hard to understand, such as "Evolutionarily, endangered species preservation in the form of fossils and other forms indicates preservation of culture just as argued in the U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 whereby, organisms ought to be preserved even after death to mark their existence and evolution over the years." How do fossils apply to the ESA? And how can organisms be preserved after death, except in the case of museum specimens? From now on, please focus on explaining the ideas of our authors in your own words, rather than trying to sound "academic" or overly-complicated.
--
For next time, focus on answering the specific questions that are asked in the assignment. Rather than including information that appears to be from external sources, such as the genetically-oriented definition of evolution--which you NEED to cite to avoid committing plagiarism--this assignment should focus on the 3 Barrow rationales and relevant links from the Kingsland article.
Ecologists have long endeavored to improve ecologi-cal literacy. This goal goes beyond informing stu-
dents about environmental issues: one must excite their
interest in ecological science, regardless of whether or
not they intend to pursue the more advanced technical
and mathematical education that modern ecology
requires (Golley 1998). The challenge is to motivate
people to tackle difficult ecological problems. Fifty
years ago, G Evelyn Hutchinson (1953) observed that,
while students did not hesitate to dive into complicated
activities concerned with “electronic amplifiers and
with the explosive combustion of hydrocarbons”, they
traditionally viewed the majority of complex activities
as boring duties. “What we have to do”, Hutchinson
wrote, “is to show by example that a very large number
of diversified, complicated, and often extremely diffi-
cult constructive activities are capable of giving enor-
mous pleasure”. The kind of pleasure that Hutchinson
was thinking of involved the formulation of theory,
discovery, and problem-solving. Repairing the bios-
phere and the human societies within it, he believed,
ought to be as much fun as repairing the family car.
While people today are better informed about environ-
mental problems , engaging students in ecological
research and conveying what ecology is about to the
public is still challenging because of the complexity of
the science.
I will draw on historical examples to illustrate ways of
thinking that are characteristic of an ecological
approach to the study of nature. My list is by no means
complete. I touch only lightly on the classics of the eco-
logical canon, which are discussed elsewhere (Real and
Brown 1991; Keller and Golley 2000). Instead, I include
some lesser known examples from medical science to
highlight different contexts in which thinking ecologi-
cally has been important. Students should appreciate
that this kind of thinking integrates methods derived
from many fields of science an.
Whether you are using the works of Lenski, Svalastoga, Sorokin, .docxhelzerpatrina
Whether you are using the works of Lenski, Svalastoga, Sorokin, or the data using Brazil as an example, please use the passage to support your own interpretation of how social stratification manifests itself in American society, and how it may work to the benefit or detriment of society as a whole.
Societal Stratification
ARCHIBALD O. HALLER
Encyclopedia of Sociology. Vol. 4. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan Reference USA, 2001. p2864-2874.
Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2001 Macmillan Reference USA, COPYRIGHT 2006 Gale, COPYRIGHT 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning
Listen
Page 2864
SOCIETAL STRATIFICATION
Societal stratification phenomena are the relatively enduring, hierarchically ordered relationships of power among the units of which society is composed. The smallest units are adults, gainfully employed men and/or women, nuclear families, or sometimes extended families or households. Such units are ordered from highest to lowest in terms of power: political power, acquisitional power, the power of prestige, and the power of informational standing. Everybody experiences stratification every day, although a person often notices it only in the sense that some people seem better or worse off than he or she is. Social thinkers, powerful people, and revolutionaries have always been especially concerned with stratification.
Page 2865 | Top of Article
Secure knowledge of the varying forms stratification structures may take is important because of the effects those structures have on many aspects of human experience, such as people's dreams of a better life, efforts to improve their situations, strivings for success, fear of failure, sympathy for the less fortunate, envy of others' good fortune, and even feelings about revolution.
A complete understanding of stratification requires several kinds of knowledge: first, what stratification structures consist of and how they vary; second, the individual and collective consequences of the different states of those structures; and third, the factors that make stratification structures change. This article reviews current thinking on the first of these elements.
HISTORY: CLASSICAL THEORY
Two different lines of thought inform modern theory on societal stratification. One is classical theory; concerned with political power and privilege, it employs historical evidence. The other is the empirical tradition, which deals with systematic data on stratification as it exists contemporarily. Present-day theory of the behavior of stratification phenomena can be traced to Karl Marx's challenge to the manufacturing and financial elites of his day. Behind his concerns and those of the working class for which he was Europe's chief spokesman for many years lay the great economic and political upheavals of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
The American and French revolutions and their aftermath culminated in legislation that made adults in many countries equal before the law. The related wave of emancipation of slaves and serf ...
1. Licit Narcotics Production in Australia: Legal
Geographies Nomospheric and Topological
STEWART WILLIAMS
University of Tasmania, School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania,
Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Email: stewart.williams@utas.edu.au
Received 3 February 2013; Revised 26 April 2013; Accepted 16 May 2013
Abstract
Licit narcotics production in Australia is based on the cultivation of a poppy crop
restricted to Tasmania under local, national, and international regulation. Its
legal geographical analysis is advanced by drawing on the thinking about ‘the
nomosphere’and ‘topology’developed by David Delaney and John Allen, respec-
tively. Australia continues to lead global production of licit narcotics as distinct
new entities, relationships, and capacities have been enabled by differentiating
between the constituent alkaloids morphine and thebaine with a loophole identi-
fied in US legislation of the 80/20 rule. Nomospheric and topological lenses are
used to focus on the intensive, emergent qualities of the industry in addition to the
traditional topography revealed in its scalar, networked territorialisation. A
renewed understanding of the spatial workings and power plays relevant can
inform possible transformation around narcotics production.
KEY WORDS legal geography; narcotics; nomosphere; poppy; Tasmania;
topology
Introduction
Humans have cultivated opium poppy (Papaver
somniferum) over the millennia for fuel, food,
and fodder, but the plant is especially prized for
its opiate or narcotic alkaloid content. Australia’s
commercial cultivation and processing of poppy
was established following trials in the 1960s.
Despite some fluctuations, it has since continued
to account for up to half of all licit narcotic raw
materials produced in the world each year
(Wood, 1988; Williams, 2010). This Australian
industry is restricted to the island state of Tasma-
nia and administered by the government there,
but the United Nations’ (UN) International Nar-
cotics Control Board (INCB) also has a critical
presence in regulating production.
Distinctly situated in space and law, the Aus-
tralian poppy industry is analysed here with a
mixed methods approach providing the rich
empirical description deemed so critical in legal
geography. For as Holder and Harrison (2003, 3)
state: ‘Context is everything.’ The spatial work-
ings and power plays shaping this global industry
are then explored with reference to David
Delaney’s and John Allen’s ‘nomospheric’ and
‘topological’ theorisations, respectively.
The paper comprises three sections. First, the
legal geography framework is explained with ref-
erence to conceptual work based on notions of
the nomosphere and topology. Second, the pro-
duction of narcotic raw material in Australia is
examined as it has been constituted in the
traditional topography of scalar, networked
territorialisation and in the more intensive land-
scape of emergent relations. Third, the findings
and their implications are discussed in light of
nomospheric and topological theorisations.
Legal geography, the nomosphere,
and topology
Over the last two decades (at least) a significant
body of scholarship has emerged at the intersec-
bs_bs_banner
364 Geographical Research • November 2013 • 51(4):364–374
doi: 10.1111/1745-5871.12025