In this regard a new company with a fresh idea with backing by defense contractor Grumman is worth one’s attention. The bottom line is this. Will Northrop Grumman go into commercial aviation?
https://youtu.be/j80l5fyWlo0
Airbus and BoeingA Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rival.docxgalerussel59292
Airbus and Boeing
A Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rivals
PREPARED FOR:
BUSINESS COMMUNICATION CLASS
PREPARED BY:
JOSEPH D’AMATO
BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR
September 30, 2014
CONTENTS
Airbus and Boeing
A Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rivals
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………….iii
Introduction……………………………………………………………………....1
Differing Approaches to Manufacturing…………………………….1
Competitive Tactics Backfire for Boeing…………………………….2
Opposing Views of the Future……………………………………………..3
Market Gambles—Both Firms “Bet the Company”…………………4
Reference List
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Boeing has been defined by its sheer technical bravado—and at times by its almost willful disregard for financial realities. The Seattle company designed the B-52 in a single weekend and launched the 747 jumbo jet in spite of the many observers who declared it financial suicide. Boeing is the world’s largest aerospace company and the largest exporter in the United States. It has built some 85 percent of the world’s jetliners and has dominated commercial aviation since the 1950s. But in 1999, the once unthinkable happened: rival Airbus sold twice as many planes as Boeing. This report is a comparison of these two competitors.
iii
Airbus and Boeing
A Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rivals
Introduction
Boeing has been defined by its sheer technical bravado—and at times by its almost willful disregard for financial realities. The Seattle company designed the B-52 in a single weekend and launched the 747 jumbo jet in spite of the many observers who declared it financial suicide. Boeing is the world’s largest aerospace company and the largest exporter in the United States. It has built some 85 percent of the world’s jetliners and has dominated commercial aviation since the 1950s. But in 1999, the once unthinkable happened: rival Airbus sold twice as many planes as Boeing.
Airbus was founded in 1970 as a consortium of four European partners with homes in Great Britain, Germany, France, and Spain. Airbus would never have gotten off the ground without subsidies from the partners’ governments. In 2001, confident that Airbus could finally stand on its own, the partners turned it into a single private company. Like Boeing, Airbus manufactures a full fleet of planes. Unlike Boeing, it has no jumbo jet. As a result, when it approaches an airline with a package deal, it has no big plane to clinch the sale.
Differing Approaches to Manufacturing
Airbus and Boeing build their planes differently. At Airbus, large airplane components, such as wings, cockpits, engines, and landing gear, are produced by suppliers all over the world and flown in giant cargo jets to a final assembly building in Toulouse, France. There, a handful of employees operating giant machines snap the large plane sections together. The finished aircraft are sold by Airbus Industry, a sales and marketing joint .
A Gyrocopter, Gyroplane, or Gyro for short, can be considered a cross between a helicopter and a fixed wing airplane. A Gyro uses rotor blades like a helicopter, but uses a propeller for power, as does a fixed wing airplane.
The rotor blades on top of a Gyro are mounted on a free spinning bearing and teetering system. These blades get their lifting power from the air moving up through them. As they move through the air they spin like a windmill. This spinning produces lift.
The forward motion of the Gyro provides the air moving up through the rotor, and a propeller provides the forward motion. As with a fixed wing airplane, in the absence of engine power, gravity must provide this forward motion.
To differentiate a helicopter from a gyro is simple. In a helicopter the rotor blades are powered. This power to the rotor blades creates an equal and opposite torque on the helicopter fuselage. A tail rotor is required to counteract this torque. A Gyro does not create this torque and therefore does not need a tail rotor
Airbus and BoeingA Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rival.docxgalerussel59292
Airbus and Boeing
A Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rivals
PREPARED FOR:
BUSINESS COMMUNICATION CLASS
PREPARED BY:
JOSEPH D’AMATO
BUSINESS INSTRUCTOR
September 30, 2014
CONTENTS
Airbus and Boeing
A Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rivals
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………….iii
Introduction……………………………………………………………………....1
Differing Approaches to Manufacturing…………………………….1
Competitive Tactics Backfire for Boeing…………………………….2
Opposing Views of the Future……………………………………………..3
Market Gambles—Both Firms “Bet the Company”…………………4
Reference List
ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Boeing has been defined by its sheer technical bravado—and at times by its almost willful disregard for financial realities. The Seattle company designed the B-52 in a single weekend and launched the 747 jumbo jet in spite of the many observers who declared it financial suicide. Boeing is the world’s largest aerospace company and the largest exporter in the United States. It has built some 85 percent of the world’s jetliners and has dominated commercial aviation since the 1950s. But in 1999, the once unthinkable happened: rival Airbus sold twice as many planes as Boeing. This report is a comparison of these two competitors.
iii
Airbus and Boeing
A Comparison of Two Airline and Aerospace Rivals
Introduction
Boeing has been defined by its sheer technical bravado—and at times by its almost willful disregard for financial realities. The Seattle company designed the B-52 in a single weekend and launched the 747 jumbo jet in spite of the many observers who declared it financial suicide. Boeing is the world’s largest aerospace company and the largest exporter in the United States. It has built some 85 percent of the world’s jetliners and has dominated commercial aviation since the 1950s. But in 1999, the once unthinkable happened: rival Airbus sold twice as many planes as Boeing.
Airbus was founded in 1970 as a consortium of four European partners with homes in Great Britain, Germany, France, and Spain. Airbus would never have gotten off the ground without subsidies from the partners’ governments. In 2001, confident that Airbus could finally stand on its own, the partners turned it into a single private company. Like Boeing, Airbus manufactures a full fleet of planes. Unlike Boeing, it has no jumbo jet. As a result, when it approaches an airline with a package deal, it has no big plane to clinch the sale.
Differing Approaches to Manufacturing
Airbus and Boeing build their planes differently. At Airbus, large airplane components, such as wings, cockpits, engines, and landing gear, are produced by suppliers all over the world and flown in giant cargo jets to a final assembly building in Toulouse, France. There, a handful of employees operating giant machines snap the large plane sections together. The finished aircraft are sold by Airbus Industry, a sales and marketing joint .
A Gyrocopter, Gyroplane, or Gyro for short, can be considered a cross between a helicopter and a fixed wing airplane. A Gyro uses rotor blades like a helicopter, but uses a propeller for power, as does a fixed wing airplane.
The rotor blades on top of a Gyro are mounted on a free spinning bearing and teetering system. These blades get their lifting power from the air moving up through them. As they move through the air they spin like a windmill. This spinning produces lift.
The forward motion of the Gyro provides the air moving up through the rotor, and a propeller provides the forward motion. As with a fixed wing airplane, in the absence of engine power, gravity must provide this forward motion.
To differentiate a helicopter from a gyro is simple. In a helicopter the rotor blades are powered. This power to the rotor blades creates an equal and opposite torque on the helicopter fuselage. A tail rotor is required to counteract this torque. A Gyro does not create this torque and therefore does not need a tail rotor
This PPT is about Airplanes .
This PPT is useful for school students for their projects.
If you want any video to this PPT, create new slide and add a video related to airplanes.
Indian Air Force (IAF) Pending Order For 10 Boeing C-17s Not at Risk as Sugge...GLOBAL HEAVYLIFT HOLDINGS
Bloomfield Hills, MI, May 26, 2010 (PressReleasePoint) -- Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC, a Defense Logistics Agency (DLA www.ccr.gov) entity based in Michigan, believes it is appropriate to address, yet again, the continuing attacks, misstatements and outright analytical/factual errors carried by multiple media outlets globally against Boeing C-17. These are largely based on comments by Secretary of Defense Dr. Robert Gates, elements of the USAF, and others demanding an end to its production.
The drumbeat of anti-C-17 commentary in US, European, Indian, Pakistani and other global news mediums; a strike at Boeing Long Beach by union workers and the observably large leap in logic suggesting the Globemaster III will be terminated as a result, appear to be part of a well-coordinated effort -- again -- to render as self-fulfilling prophecy SECDEF Dr. Robert Gates' unfounded insistence on ending production of the world's most successful strategic/tactical airlifter.
Aerospace Competitors and Several Compromised Policy Makers Behind Continuing...GLOBAL HEAVYLIFT HOLDINGS
Bloomfield Hills, MI, UPDATE September 28,2010 - According to Congressional sources, Boeing C-17 Funding is not included in the first markup of the 2011 Defense Authorization Bill which failed to make it to the floor subsequent to partisan objections to its content. At this juncture, it will in all likelihood not come up for final approval until January 3, 2011.
It is our understanding that aerospace competitors to Boeing - Lockheed-Martin and Airbus/EAD - in conjunction with several policy makers (who, by their inexplicable and irresponsible efforts to kill the operationally superior and provably cost effective C-17 Globemaster III, have ostensibly been compromised) have been, and continue to be, behind the full range of activities within government, industry and media to terminate C-17 production.
It’s not difficult to understand why: With C-17 out of the way, Lockheed-Martin will reap up to USD15 billion in C-5 - an arguably mission obsolete airlifter with a long history of reliability problems that continue to this day - modernization revenues, and up to 5 billion in C-130J orders both from the US AirForce and NATO/de facto NATO allies; Airbus/EADS will have an open door to attempt the placement of 200 overweight (12 tons at moment giving it essentially the same approx. 25 ton load capacity of C-130J) overcost (current acquisition costs may exceed that of a new C-17, prompting South Africa to withdraw its order) yet-to-be-operational A-400M - an order valued at up to 40 billion based on current projected acquisition costs, and renewed confidence and vigor to pursue 35-40 billion (100 billion over life of program) US AirForce KC-X aerial tanker replacement program.
The strategy in place is structured not only to wrest airlifter and tanker program participation from Boeing, but to set the stage for the company’s rapid elimination from existence. Thus, leaving the military and commercial aircraft sector to Lockheed-Martin and Airbu/EADS and an increasingly unstable geo-political landscape (within which the duality of asymmetric/conventional war scenarios is a constant) while simultaneously bereft of Boeing profound technological and production capacity should its enemies succeed.
This must be called what it inarguably is: An issue of national security demanding response designed to ensure continuance of Boeing, a core element of the US defense industrial base.
Myron D. Stokes
Managing Member
Global HeavyLift Holdings
Bloomfield Hills, MI, May 26, 2010 (PressReleasePoint) -- Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC, a Defense Logistics Agency (DLA www.ccr.gov) entity based in Michigan, believes it is appropriate to address, yet again, the continuing attacks, misstatements and outright analytical/factual errors carried by multiple media outlets globally against Boeing C-17. These are largely based on comments by Secretary of Defense Dr. Robert Gates, elements of the USAF, and others demanding an end to its production.
The drumbeat of anti-C-17 commentary in US, European, Indian, Pakistani and other global news mediums; a strike at Boeing Long Beach by union workers and the observably large leap in logic suggesting the Globemaster III will be terminated as a result, appear to be part of a well-coordinated effort -- again -- to render as self-fulfilling prophecy SECDEF Dr. Robert Gates' unfounded insistence on ending production of the world's most successful strategic/tactical airlifter.
HOW TO MEASURE AIRCRAFT TYPE CAPACITY? AN INNOCENT QUESTION WITH BIG CONSEQUE...DanielSALLIER
In this contribution I will introduce a new unit to measure aircraft type capacity. Aircraft type capacity is a quantity used in long term fleet forecast the type Airbus and Boeing are publishing every year or in long term forecast of movements by (generic) aircraft types the airports have to perform for future infrastructure dimensioning (terminals, aprons, stands, etc.). Aircraft capacity is downscaled at cabin level (1st, business class, etc.) leading to the contribution analysis of the different market segments to flights revenue/profit.
Aircraft type capacity has been stated in number of seats for ever. Unfortunately the seat count of an aircraft type is a very unsteady data to play with: airlines operate different seat counts even for the same aircraft type which keep changing all the time. Isn't it an inadequate unit leading to incorrect measurements which result in misleading analysis at the very origin of bad decisions?
To start with, we will have a critical look at how the aircraft type capacity is measured by the major players of the air transport industry. Then we will look at how cabin area could prove to be a far more adequate unit. Then we will question different ways of measuring it so that it can allow direct and consistent comparisons between different aircraft types. To finish with we will look at how seat counts and cabin areas can relate to each others and illustrate with an example how to reassess market segment income/profit contribution per flight.
1-2 pages of five supply chain lessons learned from the Bo.pdfConceptcreations1
1-2 pages of five supply chain lessons learned from the Boeing case. Each lesson can be in a
short paragraph.
Managing New Product Development and Supply Chain Risks: The Boeing 787 Case The 787
Dreamliner's unconventional supply chain To reduce the 787's development time from six to four
years and development cost from $10 to $6 billion, Boeing decided to develop and produce the
Dreamliner by using an unconventional supply chain new to the aircraft manufacturing industry.
The 787s supply chain was envisioned to keep manufacturing and assembly costs low, while
spreading the financial risks of development to Boeing's suppliers. Unlike the 737s supply chain,
which requires Boeing to play the traditional role of a key manufacturer who assembles different
parts and subsystems produced by thousands of suppliers (Figure 3 ), the 787's supply chain is
based on a tiered structure that would allow Boeing to foster partnerships with approximately 50
tier-1 strategic partners. These strategic partners serve as "integrators" who assemble different
parts and subsystems produced by tier-2 suppliers (Figure 4). The 787 supply chain depicted in
Figure 4 resembles Toyota's supply chain, which has enabled Toyota to develop new cars with
shorter development cycle times Figure 4 Redesigned supply chain for the Dreamliner program
Table 3 Comparison of Boeing's strategy for its 737 and 787 programs
Managing New Product Development and Supply Chain Risks: The Boeing 787 Case
Christopher S. Tang and Joshua D. Zimmerman UCLA Anderson Schood
ctangearnderson.uda.edu joshua zimmerman.20096anderson.uda.edu Commented by James I.
Nelson M.S. MBCP, CORP Business Continuity Services To stimulate revenue growth and
market response, Boeing decided to develop the 787 Dreamliner. The 787 Dreamliner is not only
a revolutionary aircraft, but it also utilizes an unconventional supply chain intended to drastically
reduce development cost and time. However, despite significant management efforts and capital
investment, Boeing is currently facing a series of delays in its schedule for the maiden flight and
plane delivery to customers. This paper analyzes Boeing's rationale for the 787's unconventional
supply chain, describes Boeing's challenges for managing this supply chain, and highlights some
key lessons for other manufacturers to consider when designing their supply chains for new
product development. Acknowiedyments: We uould like to thank Wiliam Schmidt of the Hartard
Business School and ane anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments an an earlier
version of this paper. Introduction Since the U.S. government deregulated air travel in 1977 ,
more airlines have entered the market causing fierce price competition. As airfares continued to
decline, the total number of U.S. passengers per year has risen from approximately 240 million
to 640 million from 1977 to 1999. At the same time, U.S. commercial aircraft manufacturers
have faced major competition from European companies..
The presentation explores how the Duopoly of Boeing & Airbus rules the Aircraft Manufacturing Market, The competitive Rivalry among these two companies, Porter's Five Forces acting on this industry
Investment advisors use the word outperform to describe how Bitcoin and altcoins Solana and Cardano have been doing. This is a way of saying that an investment is doing well while withholding judgment as to why, how, or any future performance. It does give any in terms of when to buy and when to sell Bitcoin.
https://youtu.be/OLMY91gzTHc
The rewards of using investment leverage can be impressive. However, the dangers of investment leverage are such that one needs to proceed with caution.
https://youtu.be/1c43BKp4PPY
Are Private Digital Tokens On Their Way Out?InvestingTips
In the aftermath of crypto winter regulators are busy cleaning up after crypto excesses and outright fraud. Bitcoin took a big hit and has now recovered to more than half of its 2021 peak. Nevertheless, there are now predictions that private digital tokens are on their way out.
https://youtu.be/78smq3UVjLo
Here is where options traders will remind you that by trading options you can make money as the market falls and not just when it is going up. So, when should investors trade options?
https://youtu.be/xgoOVxDLdLc
An idea that has attracted attention is the use of privacy pools. What are privacy pools and how would a privacy pool work? Can these balance privacy and regulation to a degree that everyone is happy?
https://youtu.be/_4DLSVLat7g
How CFTC Rules Protected a Crypto BusinessInvestingTips
The collapse of FTX was a devasting blow to the crypto world. Billions of dollars in crypto assets were lost. LedgerX, a still-solvent subsidiary of FTX went up for sale at the end of 2022 and is still operating. This is about how CFTC rules protected a crypto business from the parent company’s light-fingered owner.
https://youtu.be/MgnooZ_Cp_4
Blockchain Tech in the Wake of Crypto WinterInvestingTips
Something good happened due to the huge losses that many incurred. Folks who were only interested in a quick buck have largely gone away. Those who remain are more likely to be interested in blockchain tech in the wake of crypto winter.
https://youtu.be/WzpBS8gKkyI
Investors are generally happy that the worst fears of runaway inflation versus a severe recession were not realized in 2023. Nevertheless, there are still economic and investment risks for 2024 to be considered.
https://youtu.be/wBzD8WW16P8
Bitcoin Viability As a Long Term InvestmentInvestingTips
Bitcoin has gone back up in value and is being promoted again by investment managers. Is there Bitcoin viability as a long term investment?.
https://youtu.be/jf1xp9Cveh4
What are the investment possibilities of Bitcoin versus NFTs today? When looking at these two investment possibilities, one has a fixed maximum that will ever be produced. The other suffers from production of more than the market is interested in.
https://youtu.be/tsRWaaaMcr4
More Related Content
Similar to Will Northrup Grumman Go Into Commercial Aviation?
This PPT is about Airplanes .
This PPT is useful for school students for their projects.
If you want any video to this PPT, create new slide and add a video related to airplanes.
Indian Air Force (IAF) Pending Order For 10 Boeing C-17s Not at Risk as Sugge...GLOBAL HEAVYLIFT HOLDINGS
Bloomfield Hills, MI, May 26, 2010 (PressReleasePoint) -- Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC, a Defense Logistics Agency (DLA www.ccr.gov) entity based in Michigan, believes it is appropriate to address, yet again, the continuing attacks, misstatements and outright analytical/factual errors carried by multiple media outlets globally against Boeing C-17. These are largely based on comments by Secretary of Defense Dr. Robert Gates, elements of the USAF, and others demanding an end to its production.
The drumbeat of anti-C-17 commentary in US, European, Indian, Pakistani and other global news mediums; a strike at Boeing Long Beach by union workers and the observably large leap in logic suggesting the Globemaster III will be terminated as a result, appear to be part of a well-coordinated effort -- again -- to render as self-fulfilling prophecy SECDEF Dr. Robert Gates' unfounded insistence on ending production of the world's most successful strategic/tactical airlifter.
Aerospace Competitors and Several Compromised Policy Makers Behind Continuing...GLOBAL HEAVYLIFT HOLDINGS
Bloomfield Hills, MI, UPDATE September 28,2010 - According to Congressional sources, Boeing C-17 Funding is not included in the first markup of the 2011 Defense Authorization Bill which failed to make it to the floor subsequent to partisan objections to its content. At this juncture, it will in all likelihood not come up for final approval until January 3, 2011.
It is our understanding that aerospace competitors to Boeing - Lockheed-Martin and Airbus/EAD - in conjunction with several policy makers (who, by their inexplicable and irresponsible efforts to kill the operationally superior and provably cost effective C-17 Globemaster III, have ostensibly been compromised) have been, and continue to be, behind the full range of activities within government, industry and media to terminate C-17 production.
It’s not difficult to understand why: With C-17 out of the way, Lockheed-Martin will reap up to USD15 billion in C-5 - an arguably mission obsolete airlifter with a long history of reliability problems that continue to this day - modernization revenues, and up to 5 billion in C-130J orders both from the US AirForce and NATO/de facto NATO allies; Airbus/EADS will have an open door to attempt the placement of 200 overweight (12 tons at moment giving it essentially the same approx. 25 ton load capacity of C-130J) overcost (current acquisition costs may exceed that of a new C-17, prompting South Africa to withdraw its order) yet-to-be-operational A-400M - an order valued at up to 40 billion based on current projected acquisition costs, and renewed confidence and vigor to pursue 35-40 billion (100 billion over life of program) US AirForce KC-X aerial tanker replacement program.
The strategy in place is structured not only to wrest airlifter and tanker program participation from Boeing, but to set the stage for the company’s rapid elimination from existence. Thus, leaving the military and commercial aircraft sector to Lockheed-Martin and Airbu/EADS and an increasingly unstable geo-political landscape (within which the duality of asymmetric/conventional war scenarios is a constant) while simultaneously bereft of Boeing profound technological and production capacity should its enemies succeed.
This must be called what it inarguably is: An issue of national security demanding response designed to ensure continuance of Boeing, a core element of the US defense industrial base.
Myron D. Stokes
Managing Member
Global HeavyLift Holdings
Bloomfield Hills, MI, May 26, 2010 (PressReleasePoint) -- Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC, a Defense Logistics Agency (DLA www.ccr.gov) entity based in Michigan, believes it is appropriate to address, yet again, the continuing attacks, misstatements and outright analytical/factual errors carried by multiple media outlets globally against Boeing C-17. These are largely based on comments by Secretary of Defense Dr. Robert Gates, elements of the USAF, and others demanding an end to its production.
The drumbeat of anti-C-17 commentary in US, European, Indian, Pakistani and other global news mediums; a strike at Boeing Long Beach by union workers and the observably large leap in logic suggesting the Globemaster III will be terminated as a result, appear to be part of a well-coordinated effort -- again -- to render as self-fulfilling prophecy SECDEF Dr. Robert Gates' unfounded insistence on ending production of the world's most successful strategic/tactical airlifter.
HOW TO MEASURE AIRCRAFT TYPE CAPACITY? AN INNOCENT QUESTION WITH BIG CONSEQUE...DanielSALLIER
In this contribution I will introduce a new unit to measure aircraft type capacity. Aircraft type capacity is a quantity used in long term fleet forecast the type Airbus and Boeing are publishing every year or in long term forecast of movements by (generic) aircraft types the airports have to perform for future infrastructure dimensioning (terminals, aprons, stands, etc.). Aircraft capacity is downscaled at cabin level (1st, business class, etc.) leading to the contribution analysis of the different market segments to flights revenue/profit.
Aircraft type capacity has been stated in number of seats for ever. Unfortunately the seat count of an aircraft type is a very unsteady data to play with: airlines operate different seat counts even for the same aircraft type which keep changing all the time. Isn't it an inadequate unit leading to incorrect measurements which result in misleading analysis at the very origin of bad decisions?
To start with, we will have a critical look at how the aircraft type capacity is measured by the major players of the air transport industry. Then we will look at how cabin area could prove to be a far more adequate unit. Then we will question different ways of measuring it so that it can allow direct and consistent comparisons between different aircraft types. To finish with we will look at how seat counts and cabin areas can relate to each others and illustrate with an example how to reassess market segment income/profit contribution per flight.
1-2 pages of five supply chain lessons learned from the Bo.pdfConceptcreations1
1-2 pages of five supply chain lessons learned from the Boeing case. Each lesson can be in a
short paragraph.
Managing New Product Development and Supply Chain Risks: The Boeing 787 Case The 787
Dreamliner's unconventional supply chain To reduce the 787's development time from six to four
years and development cost from $10 to $6 billion, Boeing decided to develop and produce the
Dreamliner by using an unconventional supply chain new to the aircraft manufacturing industry.
The 787s supply chain was envisioned to keep manufacturing and assembly costs low, while
spreading the financial risks of development to Boeing's suppliers. Unlike the 737s supply chain,
which requires Boeing to play the traditional role of a key manufacturer who assembles different
parts and subsystems produced by thousands of suppliers (Figure 3 ), the 787's supply chain is
based on a tiered structure that would allow Boeing to foster partnerships with approximately 50
tier-1 strategic partners. These strategic partners serve as "integrators" who assemble different
parts and subsystems produced by tier-2 suppliers (Figure 4). The 787 supply chain depicted in
Figure 4 resembles Toyota's supply chain, which has enabled Toyota to develop new cars with
shorter development cycle times Figure 4 Redesigned supply chain for the Dreamliner program
Table 3 Comparison of Boeing's strategy for its 737 and 787 programs
Managing New Product Development and Supply Chain Risks: The Boeing 787 Case
Christopher S. Tang and Joshua D. Zimmerman UCLA Anderson Schood
ctangearnderson.uda.edu joshua zimmerman.20096anderson.uda.edu Commented by James I.
Nelson M.S. MBCP, CORP Business Continuity Services To stimulate revenue growth and
market response, Boeing decided to develop the 787 Dreamliner. The 787 Dreamliner is not only
a revolutionary aircraft, but it also utilizes an unconventional supply chain intended to drastically
reduce development cost and time. However, despite significant management efforts and capital
investment, Boeing is currently facing a series of delays in its schedule for the maiden flight and
plane delivery to customers. This paper analyzes Boeing's rationale for the 787's unconventional
supply chain, describes Boeing's challenges for managing this supply chain, and highlights some
key lessons for other manufacturers to consider when designing their supply chains for new
product development. Acknowiedyments: We uould like to thank Wiliam Schmidt of the Hartard
Business School and ane anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments an an earlier
version of this paper. Introduction Since the U.S. government deregulated air travel in 1977 ,
more airlines have entered the market causing fierce price competition. As airfares continued to
decline, the total number of U.S. passengers per year has risen from approximately 240 million
to 640 million from 1977 to 1999. At the same time, U.S. commercial aircraft manufacturers
have faced major competition from European companies..
The presentation explores how the Duopoly of Boeing & Airbus rules the Aircraft Manufacturing Market, The competitive Rivalry among these two companies, Porter's Five Forces acting on this industry
Similar to Will Northrup Grumman Go Into Commercial Aviation? (11)
Investment advisors use the word outperform to describe how Bitcoin and altcoins Solana and Cardano have been doing. This is a way of saying that an investment is doing well while withholding judgment as to why, how, or any future performance. It does give any in terms of when to buy and when to sell Bitcoin.
https://youtu.be/OLMY91gzTHc
The rewards of using investment leverage can be impressive. However, the dangers of investment leverage are such that one needs to proceed with caution.
https://youtu.be/1c43BKp4PPY
Are Private Digital Tokens On Their Way Out?InvestingTips
In the aftermath of crypto winter regulators are busy cleaning up after crypto excesses and outright fraud. Bitcoin took a big hit and has now recovered to more than half of its 2021 peak. Nevertheless, there are now predictions that private digital tokens are on their way out.
https://youtu.be/78smq3UVjLo
Here is where options traders will remind you that by trading options you can make money as the market falls and not just when it is going up. So, when should investors trade options?
https://youtu.be/xgoOVxDLdLc
An idea that has attracted attention is the use of privacy pools. What are privacy pools and how would a privacy pool work? Can these balance privacy and regulation to a degree that everyone is happy?
https://youtu.be/_4DLSVLat7g
How CFTC Rules Protected a Crypto BusinessInvestingTips
The collapse of FTX was a devasting blow to the crypto world. Billions of dollars in crypto assets were lost. LedgerX, a still-solvent subsidiary of FTX went up for sale at the end of 2022 and is still operating. This is about how CFTC rules protected a crypto business from the parent company’s light-fingered owner.
https://youtu.be/MgnooZ_Cp_4
Blockchain Tech in the Wake of Crypto WinterInvestingTips
Something good happened due to the huge losses that many incurred. Folks who were only interested in a quick buck have largely gone away. Those who remain are more likely to be interested in blockchain tech in the wake of crypto winter.
https://youtu.be/WzpBS8gKkyI
Investors are generally happy that the worst fears of runaway inflation versus a severe recession were not realized in 2023. Nevertheless, there are still economic and investment risks for 2024 to be considered.
https://youtu.be/wBzD8WW16P8
Bitcoin Viability As a Long Term InvestmentInvestingTips
Bitcoin has gone back up in value and is being promoted again by investment managers. Is there Bitcoin viability as a long term investment?.
https://youtu.be/jf1xp9Cveh4
What are the investment possibilities of Bitcoin versus NFTs today? When looking at these two investment possibilities, one has a fixed maximum that will ever be produced. The other suffers from production of more than the market is interested in.
https://youtu.be/tsRWaaaMcr4
Banks are looking at the downside of a digital dollar. Would a digital dollar hurt banks? Such an entity could end up sucking out bank deposits and putting a lot of banks out of business.
https://youtu.be/XyGteJzhngo
Short term up and down movements in crypto prices have to do with short-term market sentiment. Movements over the longer term have to do with fundamentals that drive crypto as well as other markets such as the stock market. That having been said, will 2024 be a good year for crypto?
https://youtu.be/Zz9zUvbqZpk
What are the obligations of a crypto business? How are some crypto businesses now paying a price for forgetting this part of doing business?
https://youtu.be/8PAEU0g5pdE
One reason that governments want to regulate cryptocurrencies is their use by terrorists to finance their operations. Does crypto finance terrorism and, if so, how does that work?
https://youtu.be/AeWLcHK_rx4
What happens when someone reneges on a crypto blockchain business deal? How can such problems be resolved or mediated? What rules could or should apply when problems arise? A question at the bottom of this issue is this. Are smart contracts legal?
https://youtu.be/q8tsUwaHsdo
Part of what we are seeing today is the dealing with specific crypto-related crimes. Part is sorting out who makes the rules that crypto needs to follow. We wonder this. Can the law fix crypto’s problems?
https://youtu.be/VjGIk5aYFac
A lukewarm future is about the best that many see for crypto. We are reminded of Apple when it was so desperate that it accepted a $150 million bailout from Bill Gates and archrival Microsoft. Today we see Apple as the model for crypto’s future.
https://youtu.be/ZIQXs0j7jlE
Are Crypto Infrastructure Investments Safe Bets?InvestingTips
While individual crypto investments may be risky these days, investments in the infrastructure of crypto may not be. What comes mind are DeFi businesses and crypto exchanges like Coinbase. So, are crypto infrastructure investments good bets?
https://youtu.be/_RBU-arNaK8
27052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
ys jagan mohan reddy political career, Biography.pdfVoterMood
Yeduguri Sandinti Jagan Mohan Reddy, often referred to as Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, is an Indian politician who currently serves as the Chief Minister of the state of Andhra Pradesh. He was born on December 21, 1972, in Pulivendula, Andhra Pradesh, to Yeduguri Sandinti Rajasekhara Reddy (popularly known as YSR), a former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, and Y.S. Vijayamma.
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
Future Of Fintech In India | Evolution Of Fintech In IndiaTheUnitedIndian
Navigating the Future of Fintech in India: Insights into how AI, blockchain, and digital payments are driving unprecedented growth in India's fintech industry, redefining financial services and accessibility.
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Welcome to the new Mizzima Weekly !
Mizzima Media Group is pleased to announce the relaunch of Mizzima Weekly. Mizzima is dedicated to helping our readers and viewers keep up to date on the latest developments in Myanmar and related to Myanmar by offering analysis and insight into the subjects that matter. Our websites and our social media channels provide readers and viewers with up-to-the-minute and up-to-date news, which we don’t necessarily need to replicate in our Mizzima Weekly magazine. But where we see a gap is in providing more analysis, insight and in-depth coverage of Myanmar, that is of particular interest to a range of readers.
2. There are two commercial aviation giants, America’s
Boeing and British and French Airbus. Others like
Brazil with Embraer, China with Comac C919, and
Russia with Sukhoi Superjet are either niche players or
simply have not broken into the market. It takes a lot
of time and a lot of money to compete against Boeing
and Airbus.
3. For commercial air carriers to buy a new jet from a new
company they need to be convinced that all of the
trouble and expense will be worth it. In this regard a
new company with a fresh idea with backing by
defense contractor Grumman is worth one’s attention.
The bottom line is this. Will Northrop Grumman go
into commercial aviation?
5. There is a new aviation startup and they have substantial
financial and technical backing including from
defense giant Northrup Grumman. JetZero’s triangle-
shaped jet even has funding of $235 million from the
Pentagon. It would seem that knowledgeable folks are
backing this. Why is a triangular jet a good idea?
6. With few exceptions, airplanes have been designed for
more than a century along the same lines. Wilber and
Orville Wright flew at Kitty Hawk with a plane that
had a long body with wings and a tail with a rudder,
vertical stabilizers, horizontal stabilizers, and
elevators. Passenger jets today have the same general
design.
7. The folks who want to make a triangular jet say that you
do not need all of that stuff back at the tail and that it
is just extra weight. They contend that their triangular
design will result in half the fuel being used to get
people from here to there.
8.
9. JetZero says that the triangular jet will be quieter as well
as more fuel efficient. The body of the plane itself will
be designed to provide lift and not just the wings.
Because the body of the jet will be wider, it will use its
interior space more efficiently. The jet will be lighter
than a standard model with comparable seating
capacity.
11. The concept of what is essentially a flying wing goes
back to Germany and airplane designer Hugo Junkers.
More recently the B-2 stealth bomber uses this idea.
12.
13. The maker of the B-2, interestingly enough, is Northrup
Grumman. While both Airbus and Boeing have looked
at similar concepts they are not making this idea any
sort of priority. Meanwhile JetZero is. They are nearly
ready for test flights of a one-eighth scale model of
this plane. Their target for having a full scale model
ready for test flights is four years from now.
16. It takes deep pockets like those of Boeing and Airbus to
design, build, and move a new airplane through as
long as a decade of testing to achieve certification in
the US and elsewhere. That is time when a company is
spending money without any sales. Once a jet has
been approved by the FAA and others the company
needs to build assembly lines, set up a supply chain,
and convince airlines around the world to add one
more type of airplane to their fleet.
17. A new triangular jet will use dual engines to do what the
tail assembly does on standard jets. This means a
whole different kind of flying and training. Will pilots
be cross trained to fly both types or will a whole new
breed of pilot be required? Here is where having
Pentagon backing and Northrup Grumman’s money
and technology are important.
19. Airbus is looking at hydrogen propulsion that could
eventually be used for a flying wing. However, neither
Boeing nor Airbus is planning to do much more work
on these ideas well into the next decade. However,
JetZero is pushing forward with help from Northrup
Grumman.
20. Other small aviation companies are working on air taxis
and similar smaller planes but nobody but JetZero and
Northrup Grumman are working toward a triangular
jet to be carrying passengers in the 2030s. Pentagon
likes the greater range of this kind of light weight and
fuel efficient plane for military purposes.
21. It remains to be seen if Northrup Grumman is only in
this for the plane’s potential use as a military asset like
the B-2. Or will Northrup Grumman go into
commercial aviation and compete head to head with
Boeing and Airbus?
22. For more insights and useful information about
investments and investing, visit
www.ProfitableInvestingTips.com.