The document discusses the need for a mechanism or structure to facilitate equity, play, whimsy, and curiosity on a global scale. It argues that a small amount of exclusionaryness, control, or conformity is enough to distract us from equity. It suggests trying a mechanism like networked individualism, which would set everyone free through attachment and authenticity in a self-organizing global system. The overall message is that people need a way to connect and explore freely without constraints.

2. found/created/afforded/realized... global

3. There are so many cool things happening, there are so many cool people
doing/being/creating/sharing these things/spaces…
so why is there, not yet, equity..

4. ..we do need a mechanism/glue/structure/mindset in place ..
to coordinate/facilitate/afford the synchronicity/dance/
lines-of-flight.. our souls crave.. where
so why have we not yet crafted one..
a mechanism/structure
to facilitate the:
play
whimsy
curiosity
of 7 billion+ people.
every day.
(a means for each one of us to learn/live/swim in uncertainty)
as

5. ..that tiny bit of exclusionary ness ..
(we keep reserving the right to have)
..is just enough to keep us distracted from equity/us.
{aka: discrimination to infinity}

6. ..we’re missing the functionality/capability/affordance/realization of equity by
both:
discriminating/separating ourselves into groups/silos/labels..
not quite discriminating ourselves enough..
Here we are concerned with the coexistence of dissimilars, and the central points where
fusion occurs are many: the ears of the listeners wherever they are. This disharmony, to
paraphrase Bergson's statement about disorder, is simply a harmony to which many are
unaccustomed....New music: new listening. - John Cage
We are much more effective when we are non-judgmental, because then we are
standing in reality. This is the power we need to access, if we are going to change the
planet. - Charles Eisenstein

7. ..that tiny bit of control ness ..
(we keep reserving the right to have)
..is just enough to keep us from equity/us.
matters
Play, by my definition, is, first and foremost, activity that is self-chosen and self-directed. It is activity that you are
always free to quit. - Peter Gray

8. ..that tiny bit of conformity ness ..
(we keep reserving the right to have)
..is just enough to keep us from equity/us.
What if we trusted you? – Jerry Michalski

9. ..we need the eclectic/open/cross-generational people/space that
in the cityness affords every one of us..

11. ..we need the time for whimsy/play/trust that
as the dayness affords every one us..

12. so..

13. .. a mechanism with less maslow ness and more mate ness.. seems too simple
wrong
floofy
messy
unsophisticated
unacademic
unworthy
unmeasureable
unmarketable
chaotic
utopian
impossible
..
(what i keep hearing in the.. )

14. that’s
in wait/need of a mechanism.. to ground the cha o s

15. is not about making everything equal.
is not about measuring at all.
we try a mechanism such as networked individualism where ..

16. is about

17. ..we set every one of us free via networked individualism (attachment & authenticity)..

18. we can do that.
today.
a self-perpetuating/organizing global thunderclap ness

19. up to us.
to be..