This document provides guidance on practical fundraising strategies focused on insights into philanthropic giving. It begins by explaining the importance of fundraising growth given current challenges. Next, it overviews wealth dynamics in the UK, noting the concentration of wealth among the top 1% and potential for growth if targeting this segment. The document then discusses methods for understanding donor capacity and affinity, including analyzing response rates, donation histories, and wealth screening. It concludes by recommending actionable strategies like identifying major donor prospects and calculating fundraising growth scenarios to demonstrate returns on investment in philanthropy.
Prospecting & Screening: A Beginners GuideBen Rymer
With HNWI’s typically donating 0.1% of their wealth to charity, increasing high-value contributions is a must. And while prospect research is pivotal to the success of high-value fundraising, all too often fundraisers struggle to master the basics due to lack of time or resource. The slides explain the fundamentals of prospect identification and wealth screening, how (and when) to write great donor profiles, useful tools and techniques for fundraisers getting started in prospect research, using data-drive techniques in the research process and why you should join your local library.
Finding the Bright Spots Women and Capitallaunchangels
How Women Are Succeeding with Crowdfunding, Angel Investing and Venture Capital
Join women interested in making the best possible use of their capital while investing in women-led businesses. Our lively, informative event features a panel discussion on how women entrepreneurs and investors are finding the “bright spots” in equity.
By David F. Larcker, Nicholas E. Donatiello, Brian Tayan
CGRI Survey Series. Corporate Governance Research Initiative, Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University, February 2017
In summer 2016, the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University conducted a nationwide survey of 1,554 individuals to understand how the American public views CEOs who engage in potentially unethical behavior, and the public’s determination of “fair punishment” for these actions.
The study reveals that almost half of Americans believe CEOs should be fired (or worse) for unethical behavior. Violations of trust between company and customer are considered the most egregious. And, the public is surprisingly critical of CEOs who engage in “immoral” personal actions. Key takeaways include:
Almost half of Americans believe CEOs should be fired (or worse) for unethical behavior.
Violations of trust between company and customer are considered most egregious.
The public is surprisingly critical of CEOs who engage in “immoral” personal actions.
“We find that the public is highly critical of—and very willing to fire—CEOs who engage in behaviors that are morally or ethically questionable, even if these actions are not illegal and in some cases even if they cause no obvious harm to shareholders, employees, or the public,” says Professor David F. Larcker, Stanford Graduate School of Business. “This reflects, in part, the public’s lingering distrust of large corporations and CEOs in general.”
KEY FINDINGS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE EXTREMELY CRITICAL OF CEOS WHO ENGAGE IN QUESTIONABLE BEHAVIOR.
2. THE PUBLIC BELIEVES A VIOLATION OF TRUST BETWEEN A COMPANY AND ITS CUSTOMERS IS THE MOST EGREGIOUS ETHICAL VIOLATION A CEO CAN MAKE.
3. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ARE STRICTER THAN THE PUBLIC IN ADMINISTERING PUNISHMENT.
4. AMERICANS ARE SURPRISINGLY CRITICAL OF POTENTIALLY IMMORAL BEHAVIOR.
5. MALE AND FEMALE CEOS ARE HEL
Increasing the Flow of Capital to Women Business Owners in PhoenixKristin Slice
Data, facts and discussion from the Empowered PhXX roundtable discussion on funding and increasing the flow of capital to female entrepreneurs in Phoenix.
Prospecting & Screening: A Beginners GuideBen Rymer
With HNWI’s typically donating 0.1% of their wealth to charity, increasing high-value contributions is a must. And while prospect research is pivotal to the success of high-value fundraising, all too often fundraisers struggle to master the basics due to lack of time or resource. The slides explain the fundamentals of prospect identification and wealth screening, how (and when) to write great donor profiles, useful tools and techniques for fundraisers getting started in prospect research, using data-drive techniques in the research process and why you should join your local library.
Finding the Bright Spots Women and Capitallaunchangels
How Women Are Succeeding with Crowdfunding, Angel Investing and Venture Capital
Join women interested in making the best possible use of their capital while investing in women-led businesses. Our lively, informative event features a panel discussion on how women entrepreneurs and investors are finding the “bright spots” in equity.
By David F. Larcker, Nicholas E. Donatiello, Brian Tayan
CGRI Survey Series. Corporate Governance Research Initiative, Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University, February 2017
In summer 2016, the Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University conducted a nationwide survey of 1,554 individuals to understand how the American public views CEOs who engage in potentially unethical behavior, and the public’s determination of “fair punishment” for these actions.
The study reveals that almost half of Americans believe CEOs should be fired (or worse) for unethical behavior. Violations of trust between company and customer are considered the most egregious. And, the public is surprisingly critical of CEOs who engage in “immoral” personal actions. Key takeaways include:
Almost half of Americans believe CEOs should be fired (or worse) for unethical behavior.
Violations of trust between company and customer are considered most egregious.
The public is surprisingly critical of CEOs who engage in “immoral” personal actions.
“We find that the public is highly critical of—and very willing to fire—CEOs who engage in behaviors that are morally or ethically questionable, even if these actions are not illegal and in some cases even if they cause no obvious harm to shareholders, employees, or the public,” says Professor David F. Larcker, Stanford Graduate School of Business. “This reflects, in part, the public’s lingering distrust of large corporations and CEOs in general.”
KEY FINDINGS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
1. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE EXTREMELY CRITICAL OF CEOS WHO ENGAGE IN QUESTIONABLE BEHAVIOR.
2. THE PUBLIC BELIEVES A VIOLATION OF TRUST BETWEEN A COMPANY AND ITS CUSTOMERS IS THE MOST EGREGIOUS ETHICAL VIOLATION A CEO CAN MAKE.
3. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ARE STRICTER THAN THE PUBLIC IN ADMINISTERING PUNISHMENT.
4. AMERICANS ARE SURPRISINGLY CRITICAL OF POTENTIALLY IMMORAL BEHAVIOR.
5. MALE AND FEMALE CEOS ARE HEL
Increasing the Flow of Capital to Women Business Owners in PhoenixKristin Slice
Data, facts and discussion from the Empowered PhXX roundtable discussion on funding and increasing the flow of capital to female entrepreneurs in Phoenix.
The presentation was part of the Funding Conference in London on Monday 23 February 2015.
These presentations were part of the main plenary. Slides include Peter Lewis, Andrew Morris and Craig Dearden-Phillips MBE presentations.
Find out more about the Funding Conference from NCVO: https://www.ncvo.org.uk/training-and-events/funding-conference/workshops
This event was prompted by three developments in and/or affecting the local food and drink producers:
1.Increased demand for product – including for export
2.Cessation of a number of grant schemes – historically a source of expansion funding
3.Popularity and accessibility of Crowdfunding to businesses in the sector
Database Marketing Strategy Project to determine underlying issues in Christian Resource Center non profit organisation Database. Recommendations made to improve methods of data collection based on primary research and analysis of existing secondary data provided by the Fun Development Manager Bruce Voogd.
This project has been developed by George Brown College students and has been lead by Professor Norm Williams.
You’ve probably heard about Open Data and Open Government. But have you ever considered the radical idea of Open Philanthropy? What would happen if you applied the principles of open data to philanthropic institutions such as foundations, funders and grant-makers?
In this session you’ll be introduced to three open data initiatives that are doing just that.
Join Jake Hirsch-Allen (Partner, Functional Imperative & Lighthouse Labs) Michael Lenczner (CEO, Ajah and Director, Powered By Data) and Gena Rotstein (CEO and Advisor in Philanthropy - Dexterity Ventures Inc./Place2Give) for an interactive showcase that will answer this question and unpack the benefits of Open Philanthropy for grantmakers, community organizations and donors.
Using charity sector data, can we build more sustainable communities and use market forces to drive social change?
This presentation was given as part of a panel at CKX.org Nov. 2014. Also on the panel - AJAH and FLUXX
Dr. Barbara O'Neill will present this 90-minute webinar on behalf of the Military Families Learning Network. 1.5 CEUs will be available to AFC-credentialed participants. Americans have always been fascinated by millionaires and their ranks have actually been increasing in recent years despite the financial crisis. The “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?” game show and “MegaMillions” lotteries draw big crowds. Most people become wealthy the “old fashioned way,” however, through hard work and regular saving/investing. This webinar will provide a solid path to wealth accumulation by presenting 20 research-based wealth accumulation factors and online financial planning resources. Webinar participants will learn about the following topics:
Twenty research-based factors that are associated with wealth accumulation
The awesome power of compound interest over time
The impact of lifestyle choices (e.g., health habits) upon personal finances
Research-based characteristics of millionaires
Resources for educators and consumers (e.g., online financial calculators)
Dcc speaker powerpoint presentation 2015 updatedCarl Wilson
Presentation from the 2015 Dorset Charities Conference. Event was hosted by Ward Goodman Chartered Accountants and Financial Advisers. Presentation includes the speakers slides.
Engagement: challenges, trends and new ways of thinking. Engagement conferenc...CharityComms
Michele Madden, managing director, nfpSynergy
Visit the CharityComms website to view slides from past events, see what events we have coming up and to check out what else we do: www.charitycomms.org.uk
The presentation was part of the Funding Conference in London on Monday 23 February 2015.
These presentations were part of the main plenary. Slides include Peter Lewis, Andrew Morris and Craig Dearden-Phillips MBE presentations.
Find out more about the Funding Conference from NCVO: https://www.ncvo.org.uk/training-and-events/funding-conference/workshops
This event was prompted by three developments in and/or affecting the local food and drink producers:
1.Increased demand for product – including for export
2.Cessation of a number of grant schemes – historically a source of expansion funding
3.Popularity and accessibility of Crowdfunding to businesses in the sector
Database Marketing Strategy Project to determine underlying issues in Christian Resource Center non profit organisation Database. Recommendations made to improve methods of data collection based on primary research and analysis of existing secondary data provided by the Fun Development Manager Bruce Voogd.
This project has been developed by George Brown College students and has been lead by Professor Norm Williams.
You’ve probably heard about Open Data and Open Government. But have you ever considered the radical idea of Open Philanthropy? What would happen if you applied the principles of open data to philanthropic institutions such as foundations, funders and grant-makers?
In this session you’ll be introduced to three open data initiatives that are doing just that.
Join Jake Hirsch-Allen (Partner, Functional Imperative & Lighthouse Labs) Michael Lenczner (CEO, Ajah and Director, Powered By Data) and Gena Rotstein (CEO and Advisor in Philanthropy - Dexterity Ventures Inc./Place2Give) for an interactive showcase that will answer this question and unpack the benefits of Open Philanthropy for grantmakers, community organizations and donors.
Using charity sector data, can we build more sustainable communities and use market forces to drive social change?
This presentation was given as part of a panel at CKX.org Nov. 2014. Also on the panel - AJAH and FLUXX
Dr. Barbara O'Neill will present this 90-minute webinar on behalf of the Military Families Learning Network. 1.5 CEUs will be available to AFC-credentialed participants. Americans have always been fascinated by millionaires and their ranks have actually been increasing in recent years despite the financial crisis. The “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?” game show and “MegaMillions” lotteries draw big crowds. Most people become wealthy the “old fashioned way,” however, through hard work and regular saving/investing. This webinar will provide a solid path to wealth accumulation by presenting 20 research-based wealth accumulation factors and online financial planning resources. Webinar participants will learn about the following topics:
Twenty research-based factors that are associated with wealth accumulation
The awesome power of compound interest over time
The impact of lifestyle choices (e.g., health habits) upon personal finances
Research-based characteristics of millionaires
Resources for educators and consumers (e.g., online financial calculators)
Dcc speaker powerpoint presentation 2015 updatedCarl Wilson
Presentation from the 2015 Dorset Charities Conference. Event was hosted by Ward Goodman Chartered Accountants and Financial Advisers. Presentation includes the speakers slides.
Engagement: challenges, trends and new ways of thinking. Engagement conferenc...CharityComms
Michele Madden, managing director, nfpSynergy
Visit the CharityComms website to view slides from past events, see what events we have coming up and to check out what else we do: www.charitycomms.org.uk
Adjusting primitives for graph : SHORT REPORT / NOTESSubhajit Sahu
Graph algorithms, like PageRank Compressed Sparse Row (CSR) is an adjacency-list based graph representation that is
Multiply with different modes (map)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector multiply.
2. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector multiply.
Sum with different storage types (reduce)
1. Performance of vector element sum using float vs bfloat16 as the storage type.
Sum with different modes (reduce)
1. Performance of sequential execution based vs OpenMP based vector element sum.
2. Performance of memcpy vs in-place based CUDA based vector element sum.
3. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (memcpy).
4. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Sum with in-place strategies of CUDA mode (reduce)
1. Comparing various launch configs for CUDA based vector element sum (in-place).
Data Centers - Striving Within A Narrow Range - Research Report - MCG - May 2...pchutichetpong
M Capital Group (“MCG”) expects to see demand and the changing evolution of supply, facilitated through institutional investment rotation out of offices and into work from home (“WFH”), while the ever-expanding need for data storage as global internet usage expands, with experts predicting 5.3 billion users by 2023. These market factors will be underpinned by technological changes, such as progressing cloud services and edge sites, allowing the industry to see strong expected annual growth of 13% over the next 4 years.
Whilst competitive headwinds remain, represented through the recent second bankruptcy filing of Sungard, which blames “COVID-19 and other macroeconomic trends including delayed customer spending decisions, insourcing and reductions in IT spending, energy inflation and reduction in demand for certain services”, the industry has seen key adjustments, where MCG believes that engineering cost management and technological innovation will be paramount to success.
MCG reports that the more favorable market conditions expected over the next few years, helped by the winding down of pandemic restrictions and a hybrid working environment will be driving market momentum forward. The continuous injection of capital by alternative investment firms, as well as the growing infrastructural investment from cloud service providers and social media companies, whose revenues are expected to grow over 3.6x larger by value in 2026, will likely help propel center provision and innovation. These factors paint a promising picture for the industry players that offset rising input costs and adapt to new technologies.
According to M Capital Group: “Specifically, the long-term cost-saving opportunities available from the rise of remote managing will likely aid value growth for the industry. Through margin optimization and further availability of capital for reinvestment, strong players will maintain their competitive foothold, while weaker players exit the market to balance supply and demand.”
Show drafts
volume_up
Empowering the Data Analytics Ecosystem: A Laser Focus on Value
The data analytics ecosystem thrives when every component functions at its peak, unlocking the true potential of data. Here's a laser focus on key areas for an empowered ecosystem:
1. Democratize Access, Not Data:
Granular Access Controls: Provide users with self-service tools tailored to their specific needs, preventing data overload and misuse.
Data Catalogs: Implement robust data catalogs for easy discovery and understanding of available data sources.
2. Foster Collaboration with Clear Roles:
Data Mesh Architecture: Break down data silos by creating a distributed data ownership model with clear ownership and responsibilities.
Collaborative Workspaces: Utilize interactive platforms where data scientists, analysts, and domain experts can work seamlessly together.
3. Leverage Advanced Analytics Strategically:
AI-powered Automation: Automate repetitive tasks like data cleaning and feature engineering, freeing up data talent for higher-level analysis.
Right-Tool Selection: Strategically choose the most effective advanced analytics techniques (e.g., AI, ML) based on specific business problems.
4. Prioritize Data Quality with Automation:
Automated Data Validation: Implement automated data quality checks to identify and rectify errors at the source, minimizing downstream issues.
Data Lineage Tracking: Track the flow of data throughout the ecosystem, ensuring transparency and facilitating root cause analysis for errors.
5. Cultivate a Data-Driven Mindset:
Metrics-Driven Performance Management: Align KPIs and performance metrics with data-driven insights to ensure actionable decision making.
Data Storytelling Workshops: Equip stakeholders with the skills to translate complex data findings into compelling narratives that drive action.
Benefits of a Precise Ecosystem:
Sharpened Focus: Precise access and clear roles ensure everyone works with the most relevant data, maximizing efficiency.
Actionable Insights: Strategic analytics and automated quality checks lead to more reliable and actionable data insights.
Continuous Improvement: Data-driven performance management fosters a culture of learning and continuous improvement.
Sustainable Growth: Empowered by data, organizations can make informed decisions to drive sustainable growth and innovation.
By focusing on these precise actions, organizations can create an empowered data analytics ecosystem that delivers real value by driving data-driven decisions and maximizing the return on their data investment.
Levelwise PageRank with Loop-Based Dead End Handling Strategy : SHORT REPORT ...Subhajit Sahu
Abstract — Levelwise PageRank is an alternative method of PageRank computation which decomposes the input graph into a directed acyclic block-graph of strongly connected components, and processes them in topological order, one level at a time. This enables calculation for ranks in a distributed fashion without per-iteration communication, unlike the standard method where all vertices are processed in each iteration. It however comes with a precondition of the absence of dead ends in the input graph. Here, the native non-distributed performance of Levelwise PageRank was compared against Monolithic PageRank on a CPU as well as a GPU. To ensure a fair comparison, Monolithic PageRank was also performed on a graph where vertices were split by components. Results indicate that Levelwise PageRank is about as fast as Monolithic PageRank on the CPU, but quite a bit slower on the GPU. Slowdown on the GPU is likely caused by a large submission of small workloads, and expected to be non-issue when the computation is performed on massive graphs.
3. Why Growth Matters
FPS & stricter controls on marketing; forecasted shortfalls (NCVO, RNLI);
government austerity
Younger generations agnostic on achieving social impact; CSR, ethical goods
Mixed/’layered’ funding; social finance evolving, growing
4. Value and number of British £m donations
Accessed at http://philanthropy.coutts.com/en/reports/2015/united-kingdom/findings.html on 20112015
5. Top Wealth in the UK
UK HNWI population of roughly 500,000,
estimated net worth of ~$2trn
Those highest on the income scale have
seen the highest growth in wealth
According to the ST Rich List 2015, the
wealthiest 1,000 people worth £547bn…
2% of this would double UK fundraised
income
Next: four
dimensions of
wealth:
• Change over time
• Wages
• Geography
• Wealth vs
Affluence
7. Distribution of
Total Wage Mass
by FTE PPP wage
decile
Graph shows the proportion of
total EU wages earned by each
decile
“The UK’s share of the top 1
percent accounts for “nearly
4% of the total EU wage
mass, despite comprising
only 0.4% of all EU wage
earners...Britain’s polarised
pay is skewing the numbers
for the entire continent.”
Accessed at
https://flipchartfairytales.wordpress.com/2015/05/27/inequality-in-the-
uk/ on 27092015
8. A Tale of One
City
In terms of top wealth, the
UK is a city which
happens to have a country
attached to it
Accessed at
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/1-27022014-
AP/EN/1-27022014-AP-EN.PDF on 4/1/2015
10. Drivers of Giving (McCoy, 2013)
Look at a group of supporters who ‘do the thing’ you are modelling, eg: make a
major gift, and build a picture of who they are
Determine the significant, defining characteristics of giving across the base, ie:
the key drivers?
Demographic, behavioural, attitudinal or transactional characteristics
The elements that make a good supporter differ from charity to charity.
Certainly the importance, or ‘weighting’ on each variable, will differ greatly
Accessed at http://insightsig.org/networking-events-20122013/
11. Some Questions I Tend to Ask…
• Who is responding to more than one in ten appeals? (‘responding’ not necessarily meaning
sending gifts)
• Which supporters contact us unprompted to update details, chase us to re-send something
or ask unprompted questions about our work?
• Do we have petition signatories from affluent areas who may want to uplift their giving or
become a supporter?
• Who donates via active methods, ie internet donations, cheques, telephone calls or mail
donations?
• Who attends our advocacy events? Are there repeat visitors?
• Which households have more than one family member who is a supporter?
• Who is supporting us in memory? Who among our supporters has direct experience of the
cause we work to support?
• Whose giving is uplifting spontaneously?
12. Useful Data (in no particular order)
Tenure/continuity of giving
Giving velocity
Recruitment Date
Response Ratios
Unprompted communications
Wealth flags: private bank,
property value, equity sales
First gift amount
Current Lifetime Value
Questionnaire responder
Event participant/volunteer
First gift date-present
This years gift total/av previous three
Date added
Appeals/responses
Sum total no. comms
NO MATHS REQUIRED
NO MATHS REQUIRED
Sum total giving
NO MATHS REQUIRED
NO MATHS REQUIRED
13. Actionable
Insight
1. Wealth screen all donors added to your supporter database or
those giving for the first time in the last month
2. Overlay the first gift list with response ratio scores
3. Query & export lifetime value for donors with a recent last gift
date. Descending sort on LTV. Be extra nice to those at the top
4. Query for donors giving in the thousands in ‘Super Suburbs’
5. Export within-year donation totals for the last four completed
years for your top wealth segment. Use this to calculate uplifting
giving (‘giving velocity’). Be extra nice to those at the top
6. Wealth screen and research the networks of your volunteers
7. Wealth screen petition signatories or campaigns sign-ups
8. Query for supporters using private banks
9. Query for first gift amounts in the thousands, especially internet
donations
10. Use postcode searches to locate households with more than one
supporter in affluent areas
11. Recruit a volunteer to do an old style wealth screening with a copy
of the Rich List (or even better the top 5,000 from 2005)
Eleven things to do
immediately to
understand
engagement among
your wealthier
supporters
14. A Simple, DIY
Model of
Capacity &
Affinity
• Aim is to create a
composite score
combining
capacity &
affinity
• Simple 1-100
score: simple,
usable &
insightful
15. Actionable
Strategy
1. Draw up a list of case studies to demonstrate value added by
your research work (identification & stewardship)
2. Following this, prepare a paper for senior leadership detailing
ROI of your work and estimated remaining value
3. Sum up all of the estimated value of all wealth segments on
your supporter database
4. Proactively deliver reporting on wealth segments and giving
patterns to leadership
5. Draw up a benchmarking report to demonstrate (untapped)
value of philanthropy to your organisation
1. Include a section comparing charities to HE institutions’
philanthropy income
6. Calculate the value of uplifting donors in a range of scenarios
to make the case for investment in philanthropy
7. Identify the leader in your sector. How did they get there?
8. Repeat steps 1-7
Strategy is not "high
sounding sentiments
together with plans to spend
more and somehow 'get
better'“
Strategy is "a way through a
difficulty, an approach to
overcoming am obstacle, a
response to a challenge“
From Richard Rumelt, Good Strategy/Bad Strategy
16. Rare Events
•Many other professions - epidemiologists, insurers and bankers, the military,
geographers, scholars of international relations and meteorologists - face similar
forecasting challenges
• Academic work is ongoing into correcting biases & forecasting using rare events data:
• Gary King
• Raffaella Calabrese
• Blattman, Blair & Hartman
• Popular work is also ongoing online by some of these authors and others to improve
our ability to forecast rare events
•Researchers can do more! Work across silos
17. Charity sector forecast to be
heading for a £4.6bn shortfall
within the next four years, an
achievable, sustainable way to
grow overall giving through
enduring donor relationships is a
positive message!
Barack Obama did not say ‘No,
They Can’t’, and Dr. Martin
Luther King did not say ‘I have a
nightmare’
• Understanding market dynamics of wealth/income critical to success in growing
giving, for top philanthropy and ‘leadership giving’
• Huge potential to identify wealth and understand affinity, much of which is
already in our supporter base
• These methods can be used to incorporate measures of connection and affinity
into our work
Summary
RiF-inspired talk
Until fundraising aligns better with social dynamics of wealth, its secular stagnation will continue
Transactions do not equal affinity. Mistaking these leads to short-term-ism.
Recent issues in fundraising stem from individual organisations growing in wider context of no growth overall
1) Need to reach more beneficiaries 2) The sector needs to find its next profit centre. Philanthropy can be it.
No relationship between wealth & philanthropy
Top wealth has doubled since 2008
No relationship between wealth and philanthropy
UK GDP £1.5tn p/a
As the 2014 Sunday Times Rich List shows, the very wealthiest have never been richer.
However, in 2013 Oxfam estimated that £18.5tn is held ‘offshore’. And a range of estimates collected by the Tax Justice Network put the level of hidden wealth in the trillions.
Tiny number done incredibly well. Polarisation: remember, 500,000 HNWI’s worth 2trn, but top 1,000 worth £547bn, about a quarter of the total…
However, the UK dynamic is such that the further up the income scale we go, the more gains have been achieved. Therefore, the top .5% have gained more than the top 1%, the top .1% have gained more than the top .5%, the top .01% more than the top .1%, and so on.
Equity partner PwC earns £800k p/a – who do they compare themselves to? Their boss on £2m p/a. Dynamic of top pay is that almost no one feels really well off.
Evident in interviews in Richer Lives
2,000 people regular support of £5 to one person for regular support of £10,000
Millionaires next door
Not all £’s equal; big property price often = big mortgage
Questions?
Build a profile using attitudinal, behavioural and/or attitudinal data, then look outside the group for others who are (or are likely to) ‘do the thing’, ie make a donation.
These profiles vary from organisation to organisation and between appeals and products
Important to pay attention to ‘weighting’ assigned to each value.
Simple and powerful insights into affinity and capacity
Many require only one data point and very little
First two are alternatives to RFV
Tenure can be continuous or not. Density measures gift frequency
Giving ‘type’ = pay method, cheque, internet payments active, direct debits not active
MacDonnell & Wylie: “even the crudest model is an improvement (on guessing).”
Willie Sutton, famous American bank robber said "go where the money is, and go there often"
Many analytical measures require little calculation – continuous years giving, life time value.