Karen DeSoto, a well known on-air legal analyst and attorney, recently shared her views about child violence in the blog ‘Children Killing Children’ by Brie Austin
We love it when celebrities do good things — but we love it even more when a scandal breaks. From Jerry Sandusky to Roman Polanski, Instant Checkmate presents some of the most infamous celebrity crimes.
Ready to learn more about your favorite celebs (and people you know)? Run a background check at InstantCheckmate.com today!
We love it when celebrities do good things — but we love it even more when a scandal breaks. From Jerry Sandusky to Roman Polanski, Instant Checkmate presents some of the most infamous celebrity crimes.
Ready to learn more about your favorite celebs (and people you know)? Run a background check at InstantCheckmate.com today!
More explanation about the age of consent across Europe and across the world. It is based on an article published in The Sunday Times on October 25,2009.
Da thompson taps former rival for chief positionAbe George
Brooklyn’s new district attorney is quickly filing the high ranks of his administration. DA Ken Thompson has selected Abe George to serve as the deputy bureau chief in the Major Narcotics Investigations Bureau.
Honor Killings - A Facet of Sharia Law WorldwideJohn Guandolo
John Guandolo leverages his past experience as a U.S. Marine Corps officer and FBI special agent in guiding UnderstandingTheThreat.com and bringing a focus to urgent counterterrorism issues. John Guandolo’s organization provides insight into organizations that often pose as moderate but are instead focused on creating a restrictive society under Islamic Law.
Welcome, Chief. If you’re a new TH7 or even a moderately advanced one, chances are that you love the Town Hall 7 farming opportunities at this level. It’s a huge step up from TH6, where you were easily vulnerable to TH7 attacks even when you were completely maxed out.
Karen DeSoto Reviews the Controversy of Vaccines and AutismKaren Desoto
Over the past decade or so, many people have argued and debated on the topic – do vaccines cause autism? Legal Analyst Karen Desoto shares views on this topic.
Karen DeSoto is a life-long resident of New Jersey. She has practiced law as a public defender, prosecutor, and private practice attorney, and is an on-air legal analyst for NBC News. For the latest legal news and insights to cases in the news follow Karen DeSoto.
More explanation about the age of consent across Europe and across the world. It is based on an article published in The Sunday Times on October 25,2009.
Da thompson taps former rival for chief positionAbe George
Brooklyn’s new district attorney is quickly filing the high ranks of his administration. DA Ken Thompson has selected Abe George to serve as the deputy bureau chief in the Major Narcotics Investigations Bureau.
Honor Killings - A Facet of Sharia Law WorldwideJohn Guandolo
John Guandolo leverages his past experience as a U.S. Marine Corps officer and FBI special agent in guiding UnderstandingTheThreat.com and bringing a focus to urgent counterterrorism issues. John Guandolo’s organization provides insight into organizations that often pose as moderate but are instead focused on creating a restrictive society under Islamic Law.
Welcome, Chief. If you’re a new TH7 or even a moderately advanced one, chances are that you love the Town Hall 7 farming opportunities at this level. It’s a huge step up from TH6, where you were easily vulnerable to TH7 attacks even when you were completely maxed out.
Karen DeSoto Reviews the Controversy of Vaccines and AutismKaren Desoto
Over the past decade or so, many people have argued and debated on the topic – do vaccines cause autism? Legal Analyst Karen Desoto shares views on this topic.
Karen DeSoto is a life-long resident of New Jersey. She has practiced law as a public defender, prosecutor, and private practice attorney, and is an on-air legal analyst for NBC News. For the latest legal news and insights to cases in the news follow Karen DeSoto.
Karen DeSoto has served as a public defender, prosecutor, attorney in private practice, and was the first woman, first Hispanic, and youngest person to ever serve as Corporate Counsel for the city of Jersey City, NJ.
Karen Desoto’s Contributions to the CommunityKaren Desoto
Karen DeSoto is an attorney, on air legal analyst, professor, philanthropist and humanitarian in Jersey City, New Jersey . She has made several contributions to the community throughout her career.
250 words agree or disagree to each questions Q 1.An int.docxnovabroom
250 words agree or disagree to each questions
Q 1.
An intimate partner is defined as a current or former spouse, boyfriend, girlfriend, dating partner, or sexual partner. Intimate partners can also be same sex couples. In some states intimate partners are also known as domestic partners. Intimate partner murders of females are approximately 4 to 5 times the rate for male victims (Campbell, Glass, Sharps, Laughon, Bloom 2007). The murder rates for male and female intimate partners have gone down in the past 25 years (Campbell, Glass, Sharps, Laughon, and Bloom 2007). When investigating intimate partner murders male or female the major risk factor for this crime is past cases of domestic violence (Campbell, Glass, Sharps, Laughon, and Bloom 2007). Intimate partner murders without previous domestic violence incidents occurred in 9% of cases (Vatnar, Friestad, and Bjorkly 2017 (Norway 1990-2012)). Intimate partner murders without prior domestic violence incidents research shows the suspects were highly educated and were less likely to have a criminal history (Vatnar, Friestad, and Bjorky 2017 (Norway 1990-2012)).
In the late 1960’s the women’s right movement brought attention to intimate partner violence (Gauthier-Chung 2017). Because of the increase in intimate partner violence and intimate partner murders in the 1970’s and 1980’s, many law enforcement agencies throughout the United States changed their procedures when handling these incidents in the early 1990’s (Gauthier-Chung 2017). Before these changes were made women intimate partner victims were often reluctant to prosecute their abusers (Gauthier-Chung 2017). In the eyes of law enforcement agencies and judges in the United States the unwillingness of women intimate partner violence victims to prosecute was evidence the abuse was not that bad or that it was not a valid claim (Showden 2011, P.659).
In New York State numerous changes have been made when law enforcement deals with intimate partner incidents (Gauthier-Chung 2017). Starting with when law enforcement responds to intimate partner or domestic incident, when there is evidence a crime has been committed the suspected abuser must be arrested by the investigating agency (Gauthier-Chung 2017). After an arrest has been made the state of New York handles the prosecution process (Gauthier-Chung 2017). In New York state successful prosecution does not require the victim’s cooperation (Gauthier-Chung 2017). New York state prosecutors are able to have successful cases without the victim’s help because law enforcement officers have been trained to collect evidence that supports the state’s case (Suk 2009, P. 37). Law enforcement officers gather evidence at the scene of the domestic violence such as photographs of the victim and suspect, photographs of the scene of the incident, and spontaneous statements made by the victim and suspect (Suk 2009, P. 37).
Domestic violence calls are the most deadly s.
Minority Youth and Crime Minority Youth in CourtYouth in genera.docxannandleola
Minority Youth and Crime: Minority Youth in Court
Youth in general, and young minority males in particular, often are demonized by legislators, the media, scholars, and the public at large. These attacks reinforce stereotypes and place a particularly heavy burden on young Black and Latino males.
LINDA S. BERES AND THOMAS D. GRIFFITH, “DEMONIZING YOUTH”1
In June 2001 Lionel Tate, an African American boy who was 12 years old when he killed a 6-year-old family friend while demonstrating a wrestling move he had seen on television, was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Tate, who claimed that the death was an accident, was tried as an adult in Broward County, Florida; he was convicted of first degree murder. One month later, Nathaniel Brazill, a 14-year-old African American, was sentenced by a Florida judge to 28 years in prison without the possibility of parole. Brazill was 13 years old when he shot and killed Barry Grunow, a popular 30-year-old seventh grade teacher at a middle school in Lake Worth, Florida. Although Brazill did not deny that he fired the shot that killed his teacher, he claimed that he had only meant to scare Grunow and that the shooting was an accident. Like Tate, Brazill was tried as an adult; he was convicted of second degree murder.
These two cases raised a storm of controversy regarding the prosecution of children as adults. Those on one side argue that children who commit adult crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults; they should be prosecuted as adults and sentenced to adult correctional institutions. As Marc Shiner, the prosecutor in Brazill’s case, put it, “This was a heinous crime committed by a young man with a difficult personality who should be behind bars. Let us not forget a man’s life has been taken away.”2 Those on the other side contend that prosecuting children as adults is “unwarranted and misguided.” They assert that children who commit crimes of violence usually suffer from severe mental and emotional problems and that locking kids up in adult jails does not deter crime or rehabilitate juvenile offenders. Although they acknowledge that juvenile offenders should be punished for their actions, they claim that incarcerating them in adult prisons for the rest of their lives “is an outrage.”3 According to Vincent Schiraldi, president of the Justice Policy Institute, “In adult prisons, Brazill will never receive the treatment he needs to reform himself. Instead, he will spend his time trying to avoid being beaten, assaulted, or raped in a world where adults prey on, rather than protect, the young.”4
Nathaniel Brazill is still incarcerated in the Brevard Correctional Institution. Assuming that none of his pending appeals are successful, he will not be released until 2028, when he will be 41 years old.5 Lionel Tate’s conviction, on the other hand, was overturned by a Florida appellate court in 2003. The court ruled that Tate should be retried because his competency to stan ...
CRJS420-DB3
Name
Class
Date
Professor
CRJS420-DB3
In the scenario where the probation officer has learned that probationer John Smith is living with a woman that has three children, ages six, nine, and fourteen and has failed to report to his probation officer for fourth months despite the fact he is a sex offender should result in the probation officer revoking the offenders probation and warning the women that he is a dangerous threat to children. Smith has a past history of molesting two girls, ages 4 and seven and poses a clear threat to his girlfriends children. Police officers have an ethical duty to their probationers but they also have an ethical obligation to protect members of society.
It would be unethical for the police officer to fail to warn Smith’s girlfriend of the threat he poses to her children. Smith lied and said he is on probation for statutory rape of a sixteen year old that lied about their age. This is far from the truth. Smith is a dangerous sex offender that preys on small children. Smith has the right to an attorney and a bunch of other due process rights but he does not have the right to move in with a woman that has small children that could potentially become his next victims. Not only has Smith failed to keep up with the probation officer he is also supposed to register as a sex offender.
Police have an ethical obligation to do no harm as well as allow people to make decisions based on the facts (Deshon, 2000). There is nothing illegal about providing a woman with the facts so she can make an informed decision on whether or not to place her children in danger. If the woman continues to live with the child molester the police officer is mandated by law to call social services and warn them of the threat to these children.
References
Deshon, R. (2000). Police Officers Oaths and Ethics. Retrieved may 19, 2013 from http://www.emich.edu/cerns/downloads/papers/PoliceStaff/Unsorted/OATH%20&%20ETHICS
.
Too Young Too Young to Get Charged wi.docxedwardmarivel
Too Young
Too Young to Get Charged with Murder?
Name
CJ202
Date
Professor
Too Young to Get Charged with Murder?
Juveniles are treated different in society when they commit what are considered delinquent acts. The goal of the criminal justice system is to punish adults that commit crimes but the goal of the juvenile justice system is deter juveniles from committing further delinquent acts. The juvenile justice system has a mission to change the delinquent behavior of the juvenile in order to ensure they grow up to become productive members of society instead of adult criminals. As time has gone on the goal of the juvenile justice system has not changed but instead it has become far more common for juveniles that commit adult crimes to be charged and tried as an adult.
The juvenile justice system is a network of agencies that deal with juveniles whose conduct has come in conflict with the law (Stamps, 2007). In some cases, however, the court decides the act of the juvenile is serious enough that is requires they be tried as an adult for their crime. The result of this has been controversy over whether or not juveniles should be tried as adults. In the case of Evan Savoie and Jake Eakin, two twelve year old boys, beat and stabbed their thirteen year old friend, Craig Sorger, to death and was arrested for is murder. Despite the arrests the two boys maintain they are innocent of the crime.
Juveniles are developmentally different from adults but despite their youth they do have the capability to tell right from wrong. When a juvenile commits a murder they are very clear that murder is wrong but the difference lies in whether or not the juvenile can understand the long term consequences of their actions. When a juvenile commits murder the crime is so serious that simply sending them to the juvenile justice system for a slap on the wrist does not seem just. As a result juveniles as young as eight have been arrested for murder but the youngest offender were ten when he was tried and convicted of killing his neighbor.
In this case there were two juveniles arrested for the crime. When questioned by police the boys initially denied knowing what happened to Craig even though they had come by his house earlier to ask him to come out and play. The juveniles later changed their story and claimed Craig fell out of a tree and when he would not wake up the boys got scared. Despite the young age of the two juveniles they both attempted to hide evidence in the form of bloody clothes and shoes. While prosecutors are pushing to have the juveniles tried as adults they do not currently have a motive for the crime plus the boys are extremely young.
The two boys were interviewed by forensic psychologists and were found to be normal and average adolescent boys. The forensic psychologist Johnson found the boys had no past criminal history and did not discover any major behavioral or emotional problems (Leung, 2005) ...
Chapter 1 Juvenile Justice Myths and RealitiesMyths and RealiMaximaSheffield592
Chapter 1 Juvenile Justice: Myths and RealitiesMyths and Realities
It’s only me.” These were the tragic words spoken by Charles “Andy” Williams as the San Diego Sheriff’s Department SWAT team closed in
on the frail high school sophomore who had just turned 15 years old. Williams had just shot a number of his classmates at Santana High
School, killing two and wounding 13. This was another in a series of school shootings that shocked the nation; however, the young Mr.
Williams did not fit the stereotype of the “superpredator” that has had an undue influence on juvenile justice policy for decades. There have
been other very high-profile cases involving children and teens that have generated a vigorous international debate on needed changes in the
system of justice as applied to young people.
In Birmingham, Alabama, an 8-year-old boy was charged with “viciously” attacking a toddler, Kelci Lewis, and murdering her (Binder, 2015).
The law enforcement officials announced their intent to prosecute the boy as an adult. The accused perpetrator would be among the youngest
criminal court victims in U.S. history. The 8-year-old became angry and violent, and beat the toddler because she would not stop crying. Kelci
suffered severe head trauma and injuries to major internal organs. The victim’s mother, Katerra Lewis, left the two children alone so that she
could attend a local nightclub. There were six other children under the age of 8 also left alone in the house. Within days, the mother was
arrested and charged with manslaughter and released on a $15,000 bond after being in custody for less than 90 minutes. The 8-year-old was
held by the Alabama Department of Human Services pending his adjudication.
A very disturbing video showed a Richland County, South Carolina, deputy sheriff grab a 16-year-old African American teen by her hair,
flipping her out her chair and tossing her across the classroom. The officer wrapped his forearm around her neck and then handcuffed her. It is
alleged that the teen refused to surrender her phone to the deputy. She received multiple injuries from the encounter. The classroom teacher and
a vice principal said that they believed the police response was “appropriate.” The deputy was suspended and subsequently fired after the
Richland County Sheriff reviewed the video. There is a civil suit against the school district and the sheriff’s department for the injuries that
were sustained (Strehike, 2015).
One of the highest profile cases involving juvenile offenders was known as the New York Central Park jogger case (Burns, 2011; Gray, 2013).
In 1989 a young female investment banker was raped, attacked, and left in a coma. The horrendous crime captured worldwide attention.
Initially, 11 young people were arrested and five confessed to the crimes. These five juvenile males, four African American and one Latino,
were convicted for a range of crimes including assault, robbery, rape, and attempted murder. There were two separate jury t ...
Running head CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY .docxsusanschei
Running head: CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY
1
CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY 9
Criminals and Society
11/23/2016
Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults that is the question. When courts take away trial and sentencing options, it is not possible to provide justice in every case. The great number of juvenile crimes, from petty vandalism to violent homicide, are handled by the juvenile justice system and not adult courts. The separation of the two systems is a recognition of the differences between juveniles and adults and offers juveniles greater opportunities for forgiveness and redemption. Juvenile courts exist mainly to rehabilitate youth who’ve done wrong. But that’s not possible or appropriate in every case. Some juveniles commit crimes so horrific in their depravity that justice could not be carried out in the juvenile system. Other crimes, and their perpetrators, show maturity that should be dealt with adult punishment. An example spanning both classes was a 16-year-old Sarah Johnson’s plot to murder her parents and pin the crime on an intruder. Her case was transferred to adult court, and Johnson was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. as reported by NYTIMES (2016).
Minors who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults but incarcerated in specific prisons. The reason is that regular prisons would negatively influence minors and may make them even more violent. These minors unless they are mentally handicapped can be held accountable for violent crimes. Violent crimes have serious consequences. In a violent crime a minor can be considered evil. Through violence a minor can become a menace to society because he or she can take a person’s life and there is no coming back from that. We live in a society that is civilized and if kids grow up thinking they can get away with murder then we can have chaos.
ABC reports that opponents of trying juveniles in adult courts say more needs to be done for the nation's young criminals and that the law needs to take into account their psychological development and maturity. The current system is so at odds with what the research tells us about the kids describes a deputy director and co-founder of the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center. They are deciding at a point in the kid’s life when nobody knows who he'll be in 10, 15 or 20 years. It's like sentencing someone to die in prison. It is difficult making these decisions about kids under circumstances where the research doesn't support making those kinds of decisions. Prosecutors say they only consider this scenario if the juvenile is proven to be too dangerous for society. They do consider all the options for a juvenile court if they don't have a record. Based on the nature of the ...
Bad bad teacher! How judicial lenience, cultural ignorance, and media hype have inevitably lead to lighter sentences, underreporting and glamorization of female sex offenders - By: Stephanie S. Reidlinger
Similar to What Karen DeSoto feels about ‘children killing children’ (10)
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
2. Introduction
Karen DeSoto is a well known on-air legal analyst for NBC News, a
former public defender, prosecutor, and chief corporate counsel for the
city of Jersey City NJ, and recently shared her views about child
violence in the blog ‘Children Killing Children’ by Brie Austin.
(brieaustin.com/2012/10/children-killing-children)
Karen believes that these instances, though shocking to the core, is not
new. She stated that violence begetting violence seems to be a common
thread, and that violence begets violence, and victims beget victims, and
according to her, this is what has resulted in children killing children.
www.karendesoto.com
3. Stats provide an insight into the reality
The U.S. Department of Justice reveals that 19% of the State
prison inmates who have been convicted of violence have
committed a crime against a child; 78% of the sexual assault
convicts had abused a child, with 50% of them 12 years old or
younger.
Other studies revealed that, 1 out of 5 violent offenders in State
prisons have abused a child.
7 out of 10 offenders who have been convicted of child crime
were imprisoned for a rape or sexual assault.
Two-thirds of all the prisoners who were found guilty of rape or
sexual assault were involved with one or the other type of child
abuse.
www.karendesoto.com
4. What is society’s role?
It’s about time that society gives adequate protection to children to prevent a
first time abuse;
A serious need of providing better awareness and counseling to those
children who have been abused;
Economic progress should be followed by the strengthening of services, the
treatment and oversight of the victims, as well as those of the felons.
www.karendesoto.com