2. www.rarha.eu
Setting guidelines and science
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Setting up guidelines always includes some type of review of
the science
- Narrative review
- Quantitative estimates of risk in various levels of alcohol
intake
Recent low-risk drinking guidelines based on sophisticated
quantitative summaries of risk: Australia (2009), Canada
(2012), UK (2016)
- Heavy work requiring a lot of resources
- Not (easily) an option for smaller and poorer countries
- Could this work be done for EU countries together?
3. www.rarha.eu
Problems in determining guidelines from risk data
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Problem 1: where to draw
the line? ?
(Canada)?
Di Castelnuovo et al. (2006) Arch Intern Med. .
??
4. www.rarha.eu
Problem 2: how to take into account different diseases?
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Source: Holmes et al. 2016
5. www.rarha.eu
Problem 2: how to take into account different diseases?
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Country 1: 20%
Country 2: 5%
Source: Holmes et al. 2016
Each curve is a meta-analytic
review of literature on the risk
of one disease by the level of
drinking. To derive drinking
guidelines, a summary of these
summaries is needed
6. www.rarha.eu
Problem 2: how to take into account different diseases?
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Country 1: 20%
Country 2: 5%
Country 1: 10%
Country 2: 30%
You cannot rely on estimates of overall mortality
or do one calculation for all countries combined.
Different cause-of-death distributions in
different populations need to be taken into account
Source: Holmes et al. 2016
7. www.rarha.eu
Work in Joint Action RARHA to summarize science
unerpinnings
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
- Aim: to provide this type of summarizing risk
quantification for 7 countries selected to represent the
variation of drinking patterns and mortality patterns in the
EU.
- Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy,
Poland
8. www.rarha.eu
Work in Joint Action RARHA to summarize science
unerpinnings
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Work carried out by
Jürgen Rehm’s team
at the Canadian
Centre forAddiction
and Mental Health
(CAMH), also
responsible for
calculations for the
Canadian and the
Australian guidelines.
http://www.camh.ca/en/research/new
s_and_publications/reports_and_book
s/Documents/Lifetime%20Risk%20of
%20Alcohol-
Attributable%20Mortality.pdf
9. www.rarha.eu
Method (problems to be solved, continued)
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Mortality vs. morbidity?
- Robust estimates of risk curves for
morbidity by cause not available
-> based on mortality only
- Canada: mainly mortality;
Australia: mortality; UK: mainly
mortality
10. www.rarha.eu
Method: what risk & “where to draw the line?”
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Canada: relative risk approach = risk at a
given drinking level relative to abstainers
Australia: absolute risk approach = life
time risk of dying due to alcohol if you
drink at a given level your whole life. E.g.
risk of 1/100.
- Same approach as with environmental
hazards (risk 1/1000 000)
- What criterion? 1/10, 1/100, 1/1000 (or
1/274)?
UK: both
RARHA: Rehm’s report used the Australian approach (1/100
and 1/1000); results fed into the Delphi survey on “low risk”
drinking
11. www.rarha.eu
Method / problems to solve: men vs. women
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Typical pattern:
women’s
RELATIVE risk
(of chronic
diseases)
increases more
strongly with
increasing
consumption…
Source: Holmes et al. 2016
12. www.rarha.eu
Method / problems to solve: men vs. women
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
But men have
higher ABSOLUTE
risk, with or
without alcohol
Should men drink
less than women,
because they
reach 1/100 risk
faster -- because
of their higher
baseline risk?
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
%
Mean consumption
(Units per week)
Male
Female
(Hypothetical data)
13. www.rarha.eu
Method / problems to solve: men vs. women
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
-> Australia & UK: same limits for men and women
Calculations made for RARHA: baseline risk (risk at
no alcohol consumption) assumed to be common for
men and women in order to not ‘punish’ men for
their higher baseline risk (+ sensitivity analysis)
- Delphi survey: experts asked for their opinion
14. www.rarha.eu
How to decide what diseases and injuries are alcohol-
attributable & which risk functions to use?
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
• Based on WHO
Global Status Report
on Alcohol and
Health and on the
Global Burden of
Disease work
15. www.rarha.eu
What do the RARHA calculation results look like –
combined risk curves for two countries
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Xx
-0,05
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
A
l
c
o
h
o
l
l
i
f
e
t
i
m
e
m
o
r
t
a
l
i
t
y
r
i
s
k
Population consumption in g/day
Risk M
Risk W
-0,05
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0,2
0,25
0,3
0,35
0,4
0,45
0,5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
A
l
c
o
h
o
l
l
i
f
e
t
i
m
e
m
o
r
t
a
l
i
t
y
r
i
s
k
Population consumption in g/day
Risk M
Risk W
Hungary Italy
Differences are due to
differences in cause-of death
distribution
16. www.rarha.eu
Combined EU-results / table format
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Risk:
Average
Drinking
Average across all seven countries
M W Total
10g -0.0019 0.0009 -0.0005
20g 0.0043 0.0199 0.0121
30g 0.0138 0.0471 0.0305
40g 0.0269 0.0804 0.0536
50g 0.0444 0.1267 0.0855
60g 0.0664 0.1726 0.1195
<1/1000
<1/100
>1/100
17. www.rarha.eu
Combined EU-results / table format
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
Avera
ge
Drinki
ng
Estonia Finland Germany Hungary Ireland Italy Poland
M W M W M W M W M W M W M W
10g 0.003 0.005 -0.002 0.004 -0.000 0.002 -0.006 -0.002 -0.001 0.001 0.000 0.002 -0.007 -0.006
20g 0.014 0.038 0.003 0.019 0.004 0.015 0.003 0.027 0.003 0.013 0.005 0.013 -0.000 0.015
30g 0.030 0.084 0.010 0.040 0.011 0.033 0.017 0.070 0.008 0.029 0.010 0.028 0.010 0.047
<1/1000 <1/100 >1/100
18. www.rarha.eu
Role of these calculations?
Marjatta.Montonen@thl.fi
The risk calculations might help individual
countries in assessing risks and in deriving
guidelines
In Joint Action RARHA the risk calculations were
one point of departure in the Delphi survey to
explore consensus and differing views
19. This presentation was produced for a meeting organized within
Joint Action on Reducing Alcohol Related Harm (RARHA) which has
received funding from the European Union, in the framework of the
Health Programme (2008-2013).
The content of this presentation represents the views of the
author/s and it is their sole responsibility; it can in no way be taken
to reflect the views of the European Commission or of the
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency or any
other body of the European Union. The European Commission and
the Executive Agency do not accept responsibility for any use that
may be made of the information it contains.