SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Client-responsive maize seed systems in
Eastern Africa: what do wo(men) farmers
want in their maize varieties?
Paswel Marenya
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center
(CIMMYT),
Outline
1. Society demands on crop
breeding programs
2. Decision making
3. Adoption
4. Maize trait preferences
5. Implications for seed systems
and breeding
Farmer and society needs are numerous
Household Head
Spouse
Jointly (Spouse and HH head)
Percent of
households where
variety choice was
made by:
% households where
maize harvests were
controlled by
Household head
Spouse
Jointly (Spouse and HH head)
% households where
land ownership was
by:
Household head
Spouse
Jointly (Spouse and HH head
Gender of household head
What do farmers want?
Willingness to pay experiments
Results of economic experiments
Willingness to pay
• We use economic experiments common in
marketing and economics
– Choice experiments (CE)
– Becker-de Groot-Merschack (BDM) (1964)
• Data Analyzed using Mixed Logit Estimators
• Done in
– CRV/West Ethiopia 2017
– Western Kenya 2017, 2018
Table 1: Comparison of WTP and WTSY between traits
Traits Observ1 Observ2 Mean1 Mean2 difference St-Err t-value
Cost variable: Seed price
Yield - Drought tolerant 1400 - .023 2.485 -2.462*** .001 -2289.55
Yield - Resistant to FAW 1400 - .023 .112 -.088*** .002 -48.35
Yield – Tolerant to low N 1400 - .023 .698 -.674*** .001 -645.7
Yield – Tolerant to striga 1400 - .023 1.632 -1.608*** .009 -180.75
Drought tolerant - Resistant to FAW 1400 - 2.485 .112 2.374*** .002 1721.95
Drought tolerant - Tolerant to low N 1400 - 2.485 .698 1.788*** .001 5128.35
Drought tolerant - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 2.485 1.632 .854*** .009 96.95
Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to low N 1400 - .112 .698 -.586*** .002 -470.3
Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to striga 1400 - .112 1.632 -1.52*** .009 -432.85
Resistant to low N - Tolerant to striga 1400 - .698 1.632 -.934*** .009 278.5
Yield (m/f) 668 732 .035 .03 .004* .003 1.8
Moderate drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 2.807 2.164 .643*** .029 22.25
Drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 2.933 2.365 .568*** .002 370.3
Slight res to FAW (m/f) 668 732 .466 .621 -.155*** .017 -9.1
Resistant to FAW (m/f) 668 732 .484 .526 -.043*** .004 -12.1
Slight res to low N (m/f) 668 732 1.343 .991 .352*** .005 73.5
Resistant to low N (m/f) 668 732 1.019 .752 .268*** .003 109.1
Moderate tol to striga (m/f) 668 732 .419 .6 -.18*** .002 -96.5
Tolerant to striga (m/f) 668 732 1.476 1.685 -.209*** .018 -11.35
Cost variable: Yield
Seed price - Drought tolerant 1400 - 39.828 93.055 -53.227*** .011 -4865.25
Seed price - Resistant to FAW 1400 - 39.828 5.099 34.73*** .007 4692.8
Seed price – Tolerant to low N 1400 - 39.828 24.743 15.086*** .002 11741.4
Seed price – Tolerant to striga 1400 - 39.828 63.377 -23.548*** .271 -86.85
Drought tolerant - Resistant to FAW 1400 - 93.055 5.099 87.957*** .014 6469.6
Drought tolerant - Tolerant to low N 1400 - 93.055 24.743 68.312*** .011 6133.7
Drought tolerant - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 93.055 63.377 29.679*** .271 109.45
Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to low N 1400 - 5.099 24.743 -19.644*** .007 -2613.7
Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 5.099 63.377 -58.278*** .272 -214.6
Resistant to low N - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 24.743 63.377 -38.633*** .271 -142.5
Price (m/f) 668 732 21.211 27.855 -6.645*** 0 -225000
Moderate drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 50.843 54.783 -3.941*** .671 -5.85
Drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 54.941 61.267 -6.326*** .1 -63.4
Slight res to FAW (m/f) 668 732 12.087 17.685 -5.598*** .343 -16.35
Resistant to FAW (m/f) 668 732 12.368 15.222 -2.854*** .051 -55.75
Slight res to low N (m/f) 668 732 24.903 25.444 -.541*** .074 -7.3
Resistant to low N (m/f) 668 732 18.911 19.044 -.133*** .012 -10.85
Moderate tolerance to striga (m/f) 668 732 12.643 18.519 -5.877*** .032 -185.2
Tolerant to striga (m/f) 668 732 32.03 46.035 -14.006*** .324 -43.2
Difference significant at: *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1; FAW, fall army worm; N, nitrogen; WTP, willingness to pay; WTSY,
willingness to sacrifice yield; m/f, difference between male and female respondents.
Tradeoffs have to be made
❑ To help in prioritization
(breeding and market
segmentation and development)
❑ We implement Choice
Experiments to identify
potential tradeoffs
❑ We estimate willingness to pay
(willingness to sacrifice yield)
to get specific traits
❑ The results confirm general
patterns but also new insights
It is expected that: no one variety can
have all the desirable traits
1 2 3 4
Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya
Base Model With interaction
Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female
Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47
Storability (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47
Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23
Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15
Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45
Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87
Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46
Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68
Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97
Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51
Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya
Base Model With interaction
Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female
Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47
Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47
Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23
Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15
Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45
Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87
Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46
Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68
Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97
Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51
Women do not
seem to prefer
large grain size
Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya
Base Model With interaction
Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female
Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47
Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47
Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23
Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15
Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45
Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87
Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46
Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68
Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97
Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51
Storability is
highly valued
more by women
farmers
Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya
Base Model
No Controls
With interaction
Socio-economic Controls
Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female
Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47
Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47
Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23
Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15
Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45
Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87
Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46
Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68
Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97
Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51
When socioeconomic
factors are controlled for:
Male farmers had higher
WTP for closed tip
Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya
Base Model
No Controls
With interaction
Socio-economic Controls
Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female
Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47
Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47
Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23
Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15
Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45
Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87
Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46
Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68
Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51
Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97
Women valued
Drought and Striga
tolerance twice more
than male farmers
Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya
Base Model
No Controls
With interaction
Socio-economic Controls
Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female
Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47
Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47
Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23
Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15
Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45
Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87
Low N tolerance 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46
Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68
Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51
Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97
With Socioeconomic controls
male farmers WTP for low N
tolerance was nearly 20 times
that of female farmers
Top traits
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Big grains
Earliness
Low N requirement
Heavy grain
Drought tolerance
Lodging resistant
Closed tip
Storability
Striga resistant
Preference for maize traits in western Kenya, 2017
BDM Method
-5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Medium size grains
Large grains
Lodging resistant
Early maturity
Low top-dressing
Heavy grain
Striga resistant
Closed tip
Drought tolerant
Storability
Prefeerence for maize traits in western Kenya, 2017
CE Method
Top Traits in Ethiopia
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
Sweet taste
Matures in maximum 3 months
Closed tip
Lodging resistant
Tolerant to foliar diseases
Drought tolerant
BDM Method
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Matures in maximum 3 months
Tolerant to foliar diseases
Drought tolerant
Sweet taste
Lodging resistant
Closed tip CE
CE Method
Although seed price was lowest priority women were sensitive to seed
price
(Kenya, 2018)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Seed price
Tolerant to striga
Moderate drought tolerant
Drought tolerant
Women
Men
Summary
• Women valued on storability (3.6 times than
males)
• Women valued storability about 5 times than
90-day maturity
• Male farmers valued closed tip (10 times) than
female farmers
• Women valued drought and striga tolerance
twice more than male farmers
• Male famers valued closed tip and low top-
dressing nearly equally
• Nitrogen efficiency was valued about 20 times
among men than women
• Women seem not prefer large grain size (given
the negative coefficient)
Variety (Product) differentiation
1 2 3 4
Market Segmentation
Product
Differentiation
What to breed for?
Market
Segmentation
For whom?
Take home Messages
A tale of two principles
Take home Messages
A tale of two principles
Product
Differentiation
What to breed for?
Market
Segmentation
For whom?
1. Breeding programs focus on a set of manageable traits per product
2. Guided by market segmentation based on client needs
Thank you
for your
interest!

More Related Content

Similar to What do women and men farmers want in their maize varieties

Genetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traits
Genetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traitsGenetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traits
Genetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traits
G.B. PANT UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, PANTNAGAR , INDIA 263145
 
Economics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping system
Economics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping systemEconomics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping system
Economics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping system
LPE Learning Center
 
Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...
Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...
Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...
Yanal Al-Kuddsi
 
Pipe nb
Pipe nbPipe nb
2015 Benchmarking Performance
2015 Benchmarking Performance2015 Benchmarking Performance
2015 Benchmarking Performance
National Pork Board
 
0632 "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for
0632  "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for0632  "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for
0632 "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for
SRI-Rice, Dept. of Global Development, CALS, Cornell University
 
Climate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food System
Climate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food SystemClimate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food System
Climate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food System
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
 
Gagandeep singh
Gagandeep singhGagandeep singh
Ryegrass discussion 2010
Ryegrass discussion 2010Ryegrass discussion 2010
Ryegrass discussion 2010
Alfalfaresdesarrollo
 
Catalogo
CatalogoCatalogo
13 b shukla
13 b shukla13 b shukla
13 b shukla
sumanth1201
 
Tilwin vassefieldday
Tilwin vassefielddayTilwin vassefieldday
Tilwin vassefieldday
VasseSep2010
 
thesis ppt final 3-1.pptx
thesis ppt final 3-1.pptxthesis ppt final 3-1.pptx
thesis ppt final 3-1.pptx
souravranjan6
 
GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...
GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...
GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...
CGIAR Generation Challenge Programme
 
Pest position 2015
Pest position 2015Pest position 2015
Pest position 2015
Dr-Khalid Abdullah
 
ISA Brown CS Cage Guide
ISA Brown CS Cage GuideISA Brown CS Cage Guide
ISA Brown CS Cage Guide
SureSX
 
Recent Advances in Dryland Agriculture
Recent Advances in Dryland AgricultureRecent Advances in Dryland Agriculture
Recent Advances in Dryland Agriculture
GurunathReddy20
 
Assignment # 1 Health Management
Assignment # 1 Health ManagementAssignment # 1 Health Management
Assignment # 1 Health Management
Nida Naeem
 
Advances in dryland agriculture
Advances in dryland agricultureAdvances in dryland agriculture
Advances in dryland agriculture
GurunathReddy20
 
Climate change on Agriculture
Climate change on AgricultureClimate change on Agriculture
Climate change on Agriculture
Sanju Gowda
 

Similar to What do women and men farmers want in their maize varieties (20)

Genetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traits
Genetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traitsGenetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traits
Genetic diversity and association studies of quantitative traits
 
Economics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping system
Economics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping systemEconomics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping system
Economics of nitrogen sources and rates in a long term cropping system
 
Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...
Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...
Heterosis, combining ability and per se performance of new hybrids of upland ...
 
Pipe nb
Pipe nbPipe nb
Pipe nb
 
2015 Benchmarking Performance
2015 Benchmarking Performance2015 Benchmarking Performance
2015 Benchmarking Performance
 
0632 "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for
0632  "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for0632  "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for
0632 "The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) for
 
Climate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food System
Climate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food SystemClimate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food System
Climate Change Challenges Facing Egypt's Food System
 
Gagandeep singh
Gagandeep singhGagandeep singh
Gagandeep singh
 
Ryegrass discussion 2010
Ryegrass discussion 2010Ryegrass discussion 2010
Ryegrass discussion 2010
 
Catalogo
CatalogoCatalogo
Catalogo
 
13 b shukla
13 b shukla13 b shukla
13 b shukla
 
Tilwin vassefieldday
Tilwin vassefielddayTilwin vassefieldday
Tilwin vassefieldday
 
thesis ppt final 3-1.pptx
thesis ppt final 3-1.pptxthesis ppt final 3-1.pptx
thesis ppt final 3-1.pptx
 
GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...
GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...
GRM 2013: Marker-assisted breeding for improving phosphorus-use efficiency an...
 
Pest position 2015
Pest position 2015Pest position 2015
Pest position 2015
 
ISA Brown CS Cage Guide
ISA Brown CS Cage GuideISA Brown CS Cage Guide
ISA Brown CS Cage Guide
 
Recent Advances in Dryland Agriculture
Recent Advances in Dryland AgricultureRecent Advances in Dryland Agriculture
Recent Advances in Dryland Agriculture
 
Assignment # 1 Health Management
Assignment # 1 Health ManagementAssignment # 1 Health Management
Assignment # 1 Health Management
 
Advances in dryland agriculture
Advances in dryland agricultureAdvances in dryland agriculture
Advances in dryland agriculture
 
Climate change on Agriculture
Climate change on AgricultureClimate change on Agriculture
Climate change on Agriculture
 

What do women and men farmers want in their maize varieties

  • 1. Client-responsive maize seed systems in Eastern Africa: what do wo(men) farmers want in their maize varieties? Paswel Marenya International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT),
  • 2. Outline 1. Society demands on crop breeding programs 2. Decision making 3. Adoption 4. Maize trait preferences 5. Implications for seed systems and breeding
  • 3. Farmer and society needs are numerous
  • 4. Household Head Spouse Jointly (Spouse and HH head) Percent of households where variety choice was made by:
  • 5. % households where maize harvests were controlled by Household head Spouse Jointly (Spouse and HH head)
  • 6. % households where land ownership was by: Household head Spouse Jointly (Spouse and HH head
  • 8. What do farmers want? Willingness to pay experiments Results of economic experiments
  • 9. Willingness to pay • We use economic experiments common in marketing and economics – Choice experiments (CE) – Becker-de Groot-Merschack (BDM) (1964) • Data Analyzed using Mixed Logit Estimators • Done in – CRV/West Ethiopia 2017 – Western Kenya 2017, 2018
  • 10. Table 1: Comparison of WTP and WTSY between traits Traits Observ1 Observ2 Mean1 Mean2 difference St-Err t-value Cost variable: Seed price Yield - Drought tolerant 1400 - .023 2.485 -2.462*** .001 -2289.55 Yield - Resistant to FAW 1400 - .023 .112 -.088*** .002 -48.35 Yield – Tolerant to low N 1400 - .023 .698 -.674*** .001 -645.7 Yield – Tolerant to striga 1400 - .023 1.632 -1.608*** .009 -180.75 Drought tolerant - Resistant to FAW 1400 - 2.485 .112 2.374*** .002 1721.95 Drought tolerant - Tolerant to low N 1400 - 2.485 .698 1.788*** .001 5128.35 Drought tolerant - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 2.485 1.632 .854*** .009 96.95 Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to low N 1400 - .112 .698 -.586*** .002 -470.3 Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to striga 1400 - .112 1.632 -1.52*** .009 -432.85 Resistant to low N - Tolerant to striga 1400 - .698 1.632 -.934*** .009 278.5 Yield (m/f) 668 732 .035 .03 .004* .003 1.8 Moderate drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 2.807 2.164 .643*** .029 22.25 Drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 2.933 2.365 .568*** .002 370.3 Slight res to FAW (m/f) 668 732 .466 .621 -.155*** .017 -9.1 Resistant to FAW (m/f) 668 732 .484 .526 -.043*** .004 -12.1 Slight res to low N (m/f) 668 732 1.343 .991 .352*** .005 73.5 Resistant to low N (m/f) 668 732 1.019 .752 .268*** .003 109.1 Moderate tol to striga (m/f) 668 732 .419 .6 -.18*** .002 -96.5 Tolerant to striga (m/f) 668 732 1.476 1.685 -.209*** .018 -11.35 Cost variable: Yield Seed price - Drought tolerant 1400 - 39.828 93.055 -53.227*** .011 -4865.25 Seed price - Resistant to FAW 1400 - 39.828 5.099 34.73*** .007 4692.8 Seed price – Tolerant to low N 1400 - 39.828 24.743 15.086*** .002 11741.4 Seed price – Tolerant to striga 1400 - 39.828 63.377 -23.548*** .271 -86.85 Drought tolerant - Resistant to FAW 1400 - 93.055 5.099 87.957*** .014 6469.6 Drought tolerant - Tolerant to low N 1400 - 93.055 24.743 68.312*** .011 6133.7 Drought tolerant - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 93.055 63.377 29.679*** .271 109.45 Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to low N 1400 - 5.099 24.743 -19.644*** .007 -2613.7 Resistant to FAW - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 5.099 63.377 -58.278*** .272 -214.6 Resistant to low N - Tolerant to striga 1400 - 24.743 63.377 -38.633*** .271 -142.5 Price (m/f) 668 732 21.211 27.855 -6.645*** 0 -225000 Moderate drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 50.843 54.783 -3.941*** .671 -5.85 Drought tolerant (m/f) 668 732 54.941 61.267 -6.326*** .1 -63.4 Slight res to FAW (m/f) 668 732 12.087 17.685 -5.598*** .343 -16.35 Resistant to FAW (m/f) 668 732 12.368 15.222 -2.854*** .051 -55.75 Slight res to low N (m/f) 668 732 24.903 25.444 -.541*** .074 -7.3 Resistant to low N (m/f) 668 732 18.911 19.044 -.133*** .012 -10.85 Moderate tolerance to striga (m/f) 668 732 12.643 18.519 -5.877*** .032 -185.2 Tolerant to striga (m/f) 668 732 32.03 46.035 -14.006*** .324 -43.2 Difference significant at: *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1; FAW, fall army worm; N, nitrogen; WTP, willingness to pay; WTSY, willingness to sacrifice yield; m/f, difference between male and female respondents.
  • 11. Tradeoffs have to be made ❑ To help in prioritization (breeding and market segmentation and development) ❑ We implement Choice Experiments to identify potential tradeoffs ❑ We estimate willingness to pay (willingness to sacrifice yield) to get specific traits ❑ The results confirm general patterns but also new insights It is expected that: no one variety can have all the desirable traits 1 2 3 4
  • 12. Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya Base Model With interaction Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47 Storability (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47 Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23 Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15 Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45 Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87 Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46 Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68 Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97 Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51
  • 13. Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya Base Model With interaction Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47 Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47 Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23 Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15 Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45 Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87 Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46 Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68 Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97 Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51 Women do not seem to prefer large grain size
  • 14. Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya Base Model With interaction Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47 Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47 Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23 Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15 Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45 Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87 Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46 Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68 Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97 Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51 Storability is highly valued more by women farmers
  • 15. Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya Base Model No Controls With interaction Socio-economic Controls Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47 Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47 Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23 Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15 Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45 Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87 Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46 Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68 Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97 Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51 When socioeconomic factors are controlled for: Male farmers had higher WTP for closed tip
  • 16. Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya Base Model No Controls With interaction Socio-economic Controls Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47 Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47 Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23 Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15 Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45 Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87 Low top-dressing requirement 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46 Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68 Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51 Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97 Women valued Drought and Striga tolerance twice more than male farmers
  • 17. Willingness to Pay (WTP) for Maize Traits in Kenya Base Model No Controls With interaction Socio-economic Controls Pooled Male Female Pooled Male Female Matures in 3 months or less 1.54 1.76 1.51 4.84 1.40 2.47 Long shelf life (3-4 months) 8.92 10.15 7.95 19.66 9.78 21.47 Medium grain size 0.77 1.37 0.35 -2.37 -1.35 0.23 Large grain size 1.12 1.76 0.75 0.04 3.15 -2.15 Closed tip 7.87 7.56 7.62 9.79 60.64 6.45 Heavy weight 3.96 3.30 4.47 7.48 4.31 5.87 Low N tolerance 2.71 3.06 2.79 7.67 60.91 3.46 Drought tolerant 9.80 8.55 11.17 9.55 7.36 13.68 Striga resistant 8.23 7.96 8.38 8.29 6.17 12.51 Lodging resistant 4.48 4.05 4.98 4.43 3.12 4.97 With Socioeconomic controls male farmers WTP for low N tolerance was nearly 20 times that of female farmers
  • 18. Top traits 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Big grains Earliness Low N requirement Heavy grain Drought tolerance Lodging resistant Closed tip Storability Striga resistant Preference for maize traits in western Kenya, 2017 BDM Method -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Medium size grains Large grains Lodging resistant Early maturity Low top-dressing Heavy grain Striga resistant Closed tip Drought tolerant Storability Prefeerence for maize traits in western Kenya, 2017 CE Method
  • 19. Top Traits in Ethiopia 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Sweet taste Matures in maximum 3 months Closed tip Lodging resistant Tolerant to foliar diseases Drought tolerant BDM Method 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Matures in maximum 3 months Tolerant to foliar diseases Drought tolerant Sweet taste Lodging resistant Closed tip CE CE Method
  • 20. Although seed price was lowest priority women were sensitive to seed price (Kenya, 2018) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Seed price Tolerant to striga Moderate drought tolerant Drought tolerant Women Men
  • 21. Summary • Women valued on storability (3.6 times than males) • Women valued storability about 5 times than 90-day maturity • Male farmers valued closed tip (10 times) than female farmers • Women valued drought and striga tolerance twice more than male farmers • Male famers valued closed tip and low top- dressing nearly equally • Nitrogen efficiency was valued about 20 times among men than women • Women seem not prefer large grain size (given the negative coefficient)
  • 24. Product Differentiation What to breed for? Market Segmentation For whom? Take home Messages A tale of two principles
  • 25. Take home Messages A tale of two principles Product Differentiation What to breed for? Market Segmentation For whom? 1. Breeding programs focus on a set of manageable traits per product 2. Guided by market segmentation based on client needs