SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
VIRTUAL ORIENTATION ON THE UTILIZATION
OF THE ENHANCED SCHOOL-BASED
MANAGEMENT (SBM) ASSESSMENT TOOL
WITH CONTEXTUALIZED MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
June 29, 2021
Principle 3
Accountability and Continuous
Improvement
(25%)
Good men prefer to be accountable.
Michael Edwards
Best leaders in schools always desire for
continuous improvement.
dokgenful
4
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
There is an active party that
initiates clarification of the roles
and responsibilities in education
delivery.
The stakeholders are engaged in
clarifying and defining their
specific roles and responsibilities.
Shared and participatory processes are
used in determining the roles,
responsibilities, and accountabilities of
stakeholders in managing and supporting
education.
1. Roles and
responsibilities of
accountable
person/s and
collective body/ are
clearly defined and
agreed upon by
community
stakeholders
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1. Terms of
Reference/ List of
roles and
responsibilities of the
following:
- BAC
- School Inspection
and Acceptance
Committee
- SGC
- SPG/SSG
1. Minutes of meetings,
attendance sheet, and
received invitation letter to
clarify and define the
specific roles and
responsibilities of the
members of the following
organizations and
committees:
- SGC - PTA
- Alumni Association
2. Constitution and by-
laws of PTA & Alumni
Association
1. Minutes of meetings,
attendance sheet, Memorandum
and received invitation letter to
clarify and define the specific roles
and responsibilities of the
members of the following
organizations and committees:
- SGC - PTA
- Alumni Association
2. Constitution and by-laws of
PTA and Alumni Association
3. Copy of original version and
approved amended/ratified CBL (if
any)
4. MOU, MOA/Board Resolution (if
available)
5
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
Performance accountability is
practiced at the school level
A community-level accountability
system is evolving from school-led
initiatives
Community-accepted performance
accountability, recognition, and
incentive system are being practiced.
2. Achievement of
goals is recognized
based on a
collaboratively
developed
performance
accountability
system; gaps are
addressed through
appropriate action.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1. Evidence of the
conduct of
SMEPA
- Memorandum
- Minutes of Meetings
-Agreements and Plan
Adjustments
2. Record on identified
concerns, issues, gaps,
problems (CIGPs), and
recommendations on
the non-achievement of
the target on the
implementation of PPAs
1. List of awards and
recognition given by
the school to the
community
stakeholders
2. Documentation
with photos of the
awards and
recognition given by
the school to the
community
stakeholders
1. List of awards and
recognition received by
the school from the
community stakeholders
2. Documentation with
photos of the awards
and recognition received
by the school from the
community stakeholders
3. Resolutions on
incentive and rewards
from LGU/NGOs
6
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
The school articulates the
accountability assessment
framework with basic components,
including implementation
guidelines to the stakeholders.
Stakeholders are engaged in the
development and operation of an
appropriate accountability
assessment system.
School community stakeholders
continuously and collaboratively
review and enhanced accountability
systems’ processes, mechanisms,
and tools.
3. The
accountability
system is owned by
the community and
is continuously
enhanced to ensure
that management
structures and
mechanisms are
responsive to the
emerging learning
needs and demands
of the community
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1. Documentation
report on the conduct of
presentation and
dissemination of SRC to
the stakeholders
2. Filed M&E findings
as a basis for AIP
Adjustment
3. Organized M&E
committees involving
internal stakeholders
with TOR
1. Organized M&E
committees
involving internal
and external
stakeholders with
TOR
2. Annual report of
performance review
involving internal
and external
stakeholders
1. Organized M&E
committee involving
internal and external
stakeholders with TOR
2. Annual report
supported by videos of
performance review
involving internal and
external stakeholders
3. Filed M&E findings as
a basis for AIP
adjustment
7
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
The school articulates the
accountability assessment
framework with basic components,
including implementation
guidelines to the stakeholders.
Stakeholders are engaged in the
development and operation of an
appropriate accountability
assessment system.
School community stakeholders
continuously and collaboratively
review and enhanced accountability
systems’ processes, mechanisms,
and tools.
3. The
accountability
system is owned by
the community and
is continuously
enhanced to ensure
that management
structures and
mechanisms are
responsive to the
emerging learning
needs and demands
of the community
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
4. Annual report with
photos of performance
review involving internal
stakeholders
5. Minutes of
consultative meeting in
the development of
M&E tools mechanism
to track the following:
- PTA operations
-Resources
utilization
3. Filed M&E
findings as a basis
for AIP adjustment
4. Filed M&E
findings as a basis
for SIP adjustment
5. Adjusted copy of
AIP
6. Adjusted copy of
SIP
4. Filed M&E findings
as a basis for SIP
adjustment
5. Adjusted copy of AIP
6. Adjusted copy of SIP
7. Filed Memo/
received letters and
agenda on performance
review and AIP and SIP
adjustments
8
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
The school, with the participation of
stakeholders, articulates an
accountability assessment framework
with basic components, including
implementation guidelines
Stakeholders are engaged in the
development and operation of an
appropriate accountability
assessment system.
Stakeholders continuously and
collaboratively review and enhance
accountability systems; processes,
mechanisms, and tools.
4. Accountability
assessment criteria
and tools, feedback
mechanisms, and
information
collection and
validation
techniques and
processes are
inclusive and
collaboratively
developed and
agreed upon.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1. Received letter of
invitation to the
stakeholders on the
crafting of an
accountability
assessment criteria and
tool
2. Memorandum on the
different committees
involved in the crafting
of an accountability
assessment criteria and
tool.
1. Received letter of
invitation to the
stakeholders on the crafting
of an accountability
assessment criteria and tool
2. Memorandum on the
different committees
involved in the crafting of an
accountability assessment
criteria and tool.
3. Minutes of the meeting
with photo documentation
in crafting an accountability
assessment criteria and
tool.
1. Stakeholders’ letter of
intent to conduct a review
and refinement of the
accountability assessment
criteria and tool
2. Memorandum on the
composition of the review
team for the refinement of
the accountability
assessment criteria and tool.
3. Memorandum on the
different committees involved
in the review and refinement
of the accountability
assessment criteria and tool.
9
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
The school, with the participation of
stakeholders, articulates an
accountability assessment framework
with basic components, including
implementation guidelines
Stakeholders are engaged in the
development and operation of an
appropriate accountability
assessment system.
Stakeholders continuously and
collaboratively review and enhance
accountability systems; processes,
mechanisms, and tools.
4. Accountability
assessment criteria
and tools, feedback
mechanisms, and
information
collection and
validation
techniques and
processes are
inclusive and
collaboratively
developed and
agreed upon.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
3. Minutes of the meeting
with photo
documentation in crafting
an accountability
assessment criteria and
tool.
4. Filed copy of
accountability
assessment criteria and
tool
5. Filed copy of
implementing guidelines
of accountability
assessment criteria and
tool
4. Proof of dissemination
to stakeholders on the
crafted accountability
assessment tool
5. Filed copy of
accomplished
accountability assessment
criteria and tool
6. A filed copy of
implementing guidelines of
accountability assessment
criteria and tool
7. Proof of dissemination
to stakeholders on the
result of assessment on
accountability
4. Minutes of the
meeting with photos
and videos during the
review and refinement
of the accountability
assessment criteria
and tool.
5. An approved copy
of the reviewed and
refined accountability
assessment criteria
and tool.
10
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
School initiates periodic
performance assessment with the
participation of stakeholders
Collaborative conduct of
performance assessment informs
planning, plan adjustments, and
requirements technical
assistance.
School-community-developed
performance assessment is practiced
and is the basis for improving
monitoring and evaluation systems,
providing technical assistance, and
recognizing and refining plans.
5. Participatory
assessment of
performance is done
regularly with the
community.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Performance assessment will focus on the following:
a. Performance Indicators:
- Access (gross enrolment rate, net enrolment rate, and transition rate for the last 3 years)
- Quality (General Scholastic Average,)
- Governance (Signed result of self-assessment on SBM practice)
b. Implementation of PPAs such as:
- Every Child A Reader Program (ECARP)
- rigada Eskwela
- Gulayan sa Paaralan
- Feeding Program
- Nutritional Status (baseline and end)
- Drop-Out Reduction Program (DORP)
Must include other PPAs not mentioned above
11
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
School initiates periodic
performance assessment with the
participation of stakeholders
Collaborative conduct of
performance assessment informs
planning, plan adjustments, and
requirements for technical
assistance.
School-community-developed
performance assessment is practiced
and is the basis for improving
monitoring and evaluation systems,
providing technical assistance, and
recognizing and refining plans.
5. Participatory
assessment of
performance is done
regularly with the
community.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
1. Copy of the received
letter of invitation to the
stakeholders in the
conduct of periodic
performance
assessment and review
2. Memorandum on the
different committees
involved in the conduct
of periodic performance
assessment and review
1. Copy of the received
letter of invitation to the
stakeholders in the
conduct of periodic
performance
assessment and review
2. Memorandum on the
different committees
involved in the conduct
of periodic performance
assessment and review
1. Copy of the received
letter of invitation to the
stakeholders in the
conduct of periodic
performance assessment
and review
2. Memorandum on the
different committees
involved in the conduct of
periodic performance
assessment and review
12
Principle 3: Accountability and CI
Indicator
School initiates periodic
performance assessment with the
participation of stakeholders
Collaborative conduct of
performance assessment informs
planning, plan adjustments, and
requirements for technical
assistance.
School-community-developed
performance assessment is practiced
and is the basis for improving
monitoring and evaluation systems,
providing technical assistance, and
recognizing and refining plans.
5. Participatory
assessment of
performance is done
regularly with the
community.
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
3. Minutes of the meeting
with photo documentation
during the periodic
performance assessment
and review
4. Filed copy of the
summary of findings
during the performance
assessment and review
3. Minutes of the meeting
with photo documentation
during the periodic
performance assessment
and review
4. Filed copy of the
summary of findings with
analysis of the result of
the performance
assessment and review as
inputs to planning
adjustment and technical
assistance
3. Minutes of the meeting
with photo documentation
during the periodic
performance assessment and
review
4.Filed copy of the summary
of findings with analysis of
the result of the performance
assessment and review as
inputs to planning
adjustment and technical
assistance
5. Approved adjusted AIP
#ServePaMore
#SBMmo,Level-UpMO!
Thank you!
“Since the Beginning i serve More”
I am dokgenful…

More Related Content

Similar to virtual orientation of the utilization of the sbm.pptx

Pogram Evaluation.pptx
Pogram Evaluation.pptxPogram Evaluation.pptx
Pogram Evaluation.pptxFadi El Kallab
 
Management oriented evaluation approaches
Management oriented evaluation approachesManagement oriented evaluation approaches
Management oriented evaluation approachesJessica Bernardino
 
Orientation on School Based Management.pptx
Orientation on School Based Management.pptxOrientation on School Based Management.pptx
Orientation on School Based Management.pptxElmerGAfricano
 
IFRC Framework for Evaluation
IFRC  Framework for  EvaluationIFRC  Framework for  Evaluation
IFRC Framework for Evaluationsgchaplowe
 
SBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptx
SBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptxSBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptx
SBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptxjennifersayong3
 
CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix
CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix
CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix jehill3
 
REDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptx
REDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptxREDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptx
REDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptxSajidMarickar1
 
ME_Framework.pptx
ME_Framework.pptxME_Framework.pptx
ME_Framework.pptxlovelampsys
 
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017CHC Connecticut
 
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringggggggggggggggggggggggggAhmadMasoomJamshidi
 
Management 8e
Management 8eManagement 8e
Management 8eberenesm
 
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience CHC Connecticut
 
Conducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme EvaluationConducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme EvaluationPuja Shrivastav
 
sbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docx
sbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docxsbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docx
sbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docxJAHARAPANDAPATAN1
 
Programme Evaluation in extension
Programme Evaluation in extensionProgramme Evaluation in extension
Programme Evaluation in extensionKawita Bhatt
 
revised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdf
revised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdfrevised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdf
revised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdfmadonnagracerivera
 
Revised sbm assessment tool 2012
Revised sbm assessment tool 2012Revised sbm assessment tool 2012
Revised sbm assessment tool 2012Government Employee
 

Similar to virtual orientation of the utilization of the sbm.pptx (20)

Pogram Evaluation.pptx
Pogram Evaluation.pptxPogram Evaluation.pptx
Pogram Evaluation.pptx
 
Management oriented evaluation approaches
Management oriented evaluation approachesManagement oriented evaluation approaches
Management oriented evaluation approaches
 
Curriculum monitoring
Curriculum monitoringCurriculum monitoring
Curriculum monitoring
 
Orientation on School Based Management.pptx
Orientation on School Based Management.pptxOrientation on School Based Management.pptx
Orientation on School Based Management.pptx
 
IFRC Framework for Evaluation
IFRC  Framework for  EvaluationIFRC  Framework for  Evaluation
IFRC Framework for Evaluation
 
SBM-DOD.pptx
SBM-DOD.pptxSBM-DOD.pptx
SBM-DOD.pptx
 
SBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptx
SBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptxSBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptx
SBM-Dimension2-GOVERNANCE (1).pptx
 
CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix
CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix
CHW Program Assessment and Improvement Matrix
 
REDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptx
REDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptxREDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptx
REDD_5.1_M_E_Framework.pptx
 
ME_Framework.pptx
ME_Framework.pptxME_Framework.pptx
ME_Framework.pptx
 
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
NCA Residency Session 8 April 5 2017
 
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
8-phe_monitoringgggggggggggggggggggggggg
 
Management 8e
Management 8eManagement 8e
Management 8e
 
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
 
Conducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme EvaluationConducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme Evaluation
 
sbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docx
sbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docxsbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docx
sbmassessment_tool_edtion_9.docx
 
Programme Evaluation in extension
Programme Evaluation in extensionProgramme Evaluation in extension
Programme Evaluation in extension
 
revised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdf
revised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdfrevised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdf
revised-sbm-assessment-tool-as-of-august-12-2012.pdf
 
Revised sbm assessment tool 2012
Revised sbm assessment tool 2012Revised sbm assessment tool 2012
Revised sbm assessment tool 2012
 
8 phe monitoring
8 phe monitoring8 phe monitoring
8 phe monitoring
 

Recently uploaded

microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991RKavithamani
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactPECB
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfJayanti Pande
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...Marc Dusseiller Dusjagr
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfsanyamsingh5019
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinRaunakKeshri1
 

Recently uploaded (20)

microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdfTataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
TataKelola dan KamSiber Kecerdasan Buatan v022.pdf
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
“Oh GOSH! Reflecting on Hackteria's Collaborative Practices in a Global Do-It...
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
 

virtual orientation of the utilization of the sbm.pptx

  • 1. VIRTUAL ORIENTATION ON THE UTILIZATION OF THE ENHANCED SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM) ASSESSMENT TOOL WITH CONTEXTUALIZED MEANS OF VERIFICATION June 29, 2021
  • 2. Principle 3 Accountability and Continuous Improvement (25%)
  • 3. Good men prefer to be accountable. Michael Edwards Best leaders in schools always desire for continuous improvement. dokgenful
  • 4. 4 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator There is an active party that initiates clarification of the roles and responsibilities in education delivery. The stakeholders are engaged in clarifying and defining their specific roles and responsibilities. Shared and participatory processes are used in determining the roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities of stakeholders in managing and supporting education. 1. Roles and responsibilities of accountable person/s and collective body/ are clearly defined and agreed upon by community stakeholders Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 1. Terms of Reference/ List of roles and responsibilities of the following: - BAC - School Inspection and Acceptance Committee - SGC - SPG/SSG 1. Minutes of meetings, attendance sheet, and received invitation letter to clarify and define the specific roles and responsibilities of the members of the following organizations and committees: - SGC - PTA - Alumni Association 2. Constitution and by- laws of PTA & Alumni Association 1. Minutes of meetings, attendance sheet, Memorandum and received invitation letter to clarify and define the specific roles and responsibilities of the members of the following organizations and committees: - SGC - PTA - Alumni Association 2. Constitution and by-laws of PTA and Alumni Association 3. Copy of original version and approved amended/ratified CBL (if any) 4. MOU, MOA/Board Resolution (if available)
  • 5. 5 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator Performance accountability is practiced at the school level A community-level accountability system is evolving from school-led initiatives Community-accepted performance accountability, recognition, and incentive system are being practiced. 2. Achievement of goals is recognized based on a collaboratively developed performance accountability system; gaps are addressed through appropriate action. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 1. Evidence of the conduct of SMEPA - Memorandum - Minutes of Meetings -Agreements and Plan Adjustments 2. Record on identified concerns, issues, gaps, problems (CIGPs), and recommendations on the non-achievement of the target on the implementation of PPAs 1. List of awards and recognition given by the school to the community stakeholders 2. Documentation with photos of the awards and recognition given by the school to the community stakeholders 1. List of awards and recognition received by the school from the community stakeholders 2. Documentation with photos of the awards and recognition received by the school from the community stakeholders 3. Resolutions on incentive and rewards from LGU/NGOs
  • 6. 6 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator The school articulates the accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines to the stakeholders. Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. School community stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhanced accountability systems’ processes, mechanisms, and tools. 3. The accountability system is owned by the community and is continuously enhanced to ensure that management structures and mechanisms are responsive to the emerging learning needs and demands of the community Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 1. Documentation report on the conduct of presentation and dissemination of SRC to the stakeholders 2. Filed M&E findings as a basis for AIP Adjustment 3. Organized M&E committees involving internal stakeholders with TOR 1. Organized M&E committees involving internal and external stakeholders with TOR 2. Annual report of performance review involving internal and external stakeholders 1. Organized M&E committee involving internal and external stakeholders with TOR 2. Annual report supported by videos of performance review involving internal and external stakeholders 3. Filed M&E findings as a basis for AIP adjustment
  • 7. 7 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator The school articulates the accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines to the stakeholders. Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. School community stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhanced accountability systems’ processes, mechanisms, and tools. 3. The accountability system is owned by the community and is continuously enhanced to ensure that management structures and mechanisms are responsive to the emerging learning needs and demands of the community Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 4. Annual report with photos of performance review involving internal stakeholders 5. Minutes of consultative meeting in the development of M&E tools mechanism to track the following: - PTA operations -Resources utilization 3. Filed M&E findings as a basis for AIP adjustment 4. Filed M&E findings as a basis for SIP adjustment 5. Adjusted copy of AIP 6. Adjusted copy of SIP 4. Filed M&E findings as a basis for SIP adjustment 5. Adjusted copy of AIP 6. Adjusted copy of SIP 7. Filed Memo/ received letters and agenda on performance review and AIP and SIP adjustments
  • 8. 8 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator The school, with the participation of stakeholders, articulates an accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. Stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhance accountability systems; processes, mechanisms, and tools. 4. Accountability assessment criteria and tools, feedback mechanisms, and information collection and validation techniques and processes are inclusive and collaboratively developed and agreed upon. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 1. Received letter of invitation to the stakeholders on the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool. 1. Received letter of invitation to the stakeholders on the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool. 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation in crafting an accountability assessment criteria and tool. 1. Stakeholders’ letter of intent to conduct a review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool 2. Memorandum on the composition of the review team for the refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. 3. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool.
  • 9. 9 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator The school, with the participation of stakeholders, articulates an accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. Stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhance accountability systems; processes, mechanisms, and tools. 4. Accountability assessment criteria and tools, feedback mechanisms, and information collection and validation techniques and processes are inclusive and collaboratively developed and agreed upon. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation in crafting an accountability assessment criteria and tool. 4. Filed copy of accountability assessment criteria and tool 5. Filed copy of implementing guidelines of accountability assessment criteria and tool 4. Proof of dissemination to stakeholders on the crafted accountability assessment tool 5. Filed copy of accomplished accountability assessment criteria and tool 6. A filed copy of implementing guidelines of accountability assessment criteria and tool 7. Proof of dissemination to stakeholders on the result of assessment on accountability 4. Minutes of the meeting with photos and videos during the review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. 5. An approved copy of the reviewed and refined accountability assessment criteria and tool.
  • 10. 10 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator School initiates periodic performance assessment with the participation of stakeholders Collaborative conduct of performance assessment informs planning, plan adjustments, and requirements technical assistance. School-community-developed performance assessment is practiced and is the basis for improving monitoring and evaluation systems, providing technical assistance, and recognizing and refining plans. 5. Participatory assessment of performance is done regularly with the community. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Performance assessment will focus on the following: a. Performance Indicators: - Access (gross enrolment rate, net enrolment rate, and transition rate for the last 3 years) - Quality (General Scholastic Average,) - Governance (Signed result of self-assessment on SBM practice) b. Implementation of PPAs such as: - Every Child A Reader Program (ECARP) - rigada Eskwela - Gulayan sa Paaralan - Feeding Program - Nutritional Status (baseline and end) - Drop-Out Reduction Program (DORP) Must include other PPAs not mentioned above
  • 11. 11 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator School initiates periodic performance assessment with the participation of stakeholders Collaborative conduct of performance assessment informs planning, plan adjustments, and requirements for technical assistance. School-community-developed performance assessment is practiced and is the basis for improving monitoring and evaluation systems, providing technical assistance, and recognizing and refining plans. 5. Participatory assessment of performance is done regularly with the community. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 1. Copy of the received letter of invitation to the stakeholders in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 1. Copy of the received letter of invitation to the stakeholders in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 1. Copy of the received letter of invitation to the stakeholders in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review
  • 12. 12 Principle 3: Accountability and CI Indicator School initiates periodic performance assessment with the participation of stakeholders Collaborative conduct of performance assessment informs planning, plan adjustments, and requirements for technical assistance. School-community-developed performance assessment is practiced and is the basis for improving monitoring and evaluation systems, providing technical assistance, and recognizing and refining plans. 5. Participatory assessment of performance is done regularly with the community. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation during the periodic performance assessment and review 4. Filed copy of the summary of findings during the performance assessment and review 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation during the periodic performance assessment and review 4. Filed copy of the summary of findings with analysis of the result of the performance assessment and review as inputs to planning adjustment and technical assistance 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation during the periodic performance assessment and review 4.Filed copy of the summary of findings with analysis of the result of the performance assessment and review as inputs to planning adjustment and technical assistance 5. Approved adjusted AIP
  • 14. Thank you! “Since the Beginning i serve More” I am dokgenful…

Editor's Notes

  1. Good morning to everyone. We are now on the 3rd Principle of SBM.. So let’s proceed.. If we hear that… A clear, transparent, inclusive and responsive accountability system is in place. collaboratively developed by community stakeholders, which monitors expected and actual performance, continually addresses the gaps and ensures a venue for feedback and redress. This is what ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT means
  2. Principle 3 is on ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT having a share of 25% in the computation of scores obtained by the school in DOD (Document analysis, Observation and Discussion). :
  3. This 3rd principle has 5 main indicators, and each level has specific indicators to consider in the preparation of MOVs The first main indicator states that : 1.Roles and responsibilities of accountable person/s and collective body/ are clearly defined and agreed upon by community stakeholders. Level 1 specific indicator states that …There is an active party that initiates clarification of the roles and responsibilities in education delivery. So in this indicator, we will be looking for 1. Terms of reference/ list of roles and responsibilities of the following: - Bids and Awards Committee - School Inspection and Acceptance Committee - School Governing Council - Supreme Pupil Government/ Supreme Student Government Level 2 indicator…The stakeholders are engaged in clarifying and defining their specific roles and responsibilities . Level 3…Shared and participatory processare used in determining the roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities of stakeholders in managing and supporting education. The first 2 MOVS for levels 2 and 3.. Minutes of meetings,attendance sheet, and received invitation letter to clarify and define the specific roles and responsibilities of the members of the following organizations and committees: - School Governing Council -Parents and Teachers Association -Alumni Association 2. Constitution and by-laws of Parents and Teachers Association and Alumni Association … ………….Association are the same except the Memorandum to be looked for in Level 3. Aditional Movs for Level 3 3. Copy of original version and approved amended/ratified CBL (if any) 4. MOU, MOA/Board Resolution (if available)
  4. Second main indicator 2. Achievement of goals is recognized based on a collaboratively developed performance accountability system; gaps are addressed through appropriate action. The indicator for level 1 is.. Performance accountability is practiced at the school level We will look for the : 1. Evidence on the conduct of School Monitoring, Evaluation, and Plan Adjustment (SMEPA) like: - Memorandum - Minutes of Meetings -Agreements and Plan Adjustments 2. Record on identified concerns, issues, gaps, problems (CIGPs), and recommendations on the non-achievement of the target on the implementation of PPAs Level 2 indicator is A community-level accountability system is evolving from school-led initiatives Movs to look for are the foll: 1. List of awards and recognition given by the school to the community stakeholders 2. Documentation with photos of the awards and recognition given by the school to the community stakeholders Level 3 indicator is Community-accepted performance accountability, recognition, and incentive system are being practiced. MOV is the same with Level 2,the difference is the List of awards and recognition received by the school from the community stakeholders Same with MOV number 2, . Additional MOV for no. 3 is Resolutions on incentive and rewards from LGU/NGOs 2. Documentation with photos of the awards and recognition received by the school from the community stakeholders 3. Resolutions on incentive and rewards from LGU/NGOs
  5. The 3rd indicator 3.The accountability system is owned by the community and is continuously enhanced to ensure that management structures and mechanisms are responsive to the emerging learning needs and demands of the community Indicator for level 1 is The school articulates the accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines to the stakeholders. These are the MOVs: 1. Documentation report on the conduct of presentation and dissemination of SRC to the stakeholders 2. Filed M&E findings as a basis for AIP Adjustment 3. Organized M&E committees involving internal stakeholders with TOR 4. Annual report with photos of performance review involving internal stakeholders 5. Minutes of consultative meeting in the development of M&E tools mechanism to track the following: - PTA operations - Resources utilization Indicator for Level 2- Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. and For Level 3 -School community stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhanced accountability systems’ processes, mechanisms, and tools. As you can see, MOVS 1-6 for level 2 and 3 are the same, 1. Organized M&E committees involving internal and external stakeholders with TOR 2. Annual report of performance review involving internal and external stakeholders 3. Filed M&E findings as a basis for AIP adjustment 4. Filed M&E findings as a basis for SIP adjustment 5. Adjusted copy of AIP 6. Adjusted copy of SIP With additional MOV for level 3 – 7. Filed Memo/ received letters and agenda on performance review and AIP and SIP adjustments
  6. The 3rd indicator 3.The accountability system is owned by the community and is continuously enhanced to ensure that management structures and mechanisms are responsive to the emerging learning needs and demands of the community Indicator for level 1 is The school articulates the accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines to the stakeholders. These are the MOVs: 1. Documentation report on the conduct of presentation and dissemination of SRC to the stakeholders 2. Filed M&E findings as a basis for AIP Adjustment 3. Organized M&E committees involving internal stakeholders with TOR 4. Annual report with photos of performance review involving internal stakeholders 5. Minutes of consultative meeting in the development of M&E tools mechanism to track the following: - PTA operations - Resources utilization Indicator for Level 2- Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. and For Level 3 -School community stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhanced accountability systems’ processes, mechanisms, and tools. As you can see, MOVS 1-6 for level 2 and 3 are the same, 1. Organized M&E committees involving internal and external stakeholders with TOR 2. Annual report of performance review involving internal and external stakeholders 3. Filed M&E findings as a basis for AIP adjustment 4. Filed M&E findings as a basis for SIP adjustment 5. Adjusted copy of AIP 6. Adjusted copy of SIP With additional MOV for level 3 – 7. Filed Memo/ received letters and agenda on performance review and AIP and SIP adjustments
  7. The 4th main Indicator 4. Accountability assessment criteria and tools, feedback mechanisms, and information collection and validation techniques and processes are inclusive and collaboratively developed and agreed upon. The indicator for Level 1- The school, with the participation of stakeholders, articulates an accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines For level 2- Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. MOVs 1-3 for Levels 1 and 2 are the same. 1. Received letter of invitation to the stakeholders on the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool. 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation in crafting an accountability assessment criteria and tool. Number 4-5 MOVs for level 1 4. Filed copy of accountability assessment criteria and tool 5. Filed copy of implementing guidelines of accountability assessment criteria and tool For level 2 MOVs 4-7 are: 4. Proof of dissemination to stakeholders on the crafted accountability assessment tool 5. Filed copy of accomplished accountability assessment criteria and tool 6. A filed copy of implementing guidelines of accountability assessment criteria and tool 7. Proof of dissemination to stakeholders on the result of assessment on accountability Indicator for level 3-Stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhance accountability systems; processes, mechanisms, and tools. These are the MOVs : 1. Stakeholders letter of intent to conduct a review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool’ 2. Memorandum on the composition of the review team for the refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. 3. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. 4. Minutes of the meeting with photos and videos during the review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. As you can see, Photos and videos are highlighted to see the progression. 5. An approved copy of the reviewed and refined accountability assessment criteria and tool.
  8. The 4th main Indicator 4. Accountability assessment criteria and tools, feedback mechanisms, and information collection and validation techniques and processes are inclusive and collaboratively developed and agreed upon. The indicator for Level 1- The school, with the participation of stakeholders, articulates an accountability assessment framework with basic components, including implementation guidelines For level 2- Stakeholders are engaged in the development and operation of an appropriate accountability assessment system. MOVs 1-3 for Levels 1 and 2 are the same. 1. Received letter of invitation to the stakeholders on the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the crafting of an accountability assessment criteria and tool. 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation in crafting an accountability assessment criteria and tool. Number 4-5 MOVs for level 1 4. Filed copy of accountability assessment criteria and tool 5. Filed copy of implementing guidelines of accountability assessment criteria and tool For level 2 MOVs 4-7 are: 4. Proof of dissemination to stakeholders on the crafted accountability assessment tool 5. Filed copy of accomplished accountability assessment criteria and tool 6. A filed copy of implementing guidelines of accountability assessment criteria and tool 7. Proof of dissemination to stakeholders on the result of assessment on accountability Indicator for level 3-Stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhance accountability systems; processes, mechanisms, and tools. These are the MOVs : 1. Stakeholders letter of intent to conduct a review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool’ 2. Memorandum on the composition of the review team for the refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. 3. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. 4. Minutes of the meeting with photos and videos during the review and refinement of the accountability assessment criteria and tool. As you can see, Photos and videos are highlighted to see the progression. 5. An approved copy of the reviewed and refined accountability assessment criteria and tool.
  9. The last main indicator for this principle is 5. Participatory assessment of performance is done regularly with the community. Level 1 Indicator states that: School initiates periodic performance assessment with the participation of stakeholders. Level 2 Indicator Collaborative conduct of performance assessment informs planning, plan adjustments, and requirements technical assistance. Level 3 School-community-developed performance assessment is practiced and is the basis for improving monitoring and evaluation systems, providing technical assistance, and recognizing and refining plans. The 3 Levels have the same MOVs to look for as follows: Performance assessment will focus on the following: a. Performance Indicators: - Access (gross enrolment rate, net enrolment rate, and transition rate for the last 3 years) - Quality (General Scholastic Average,) Governance (Signed result of self-assessment on SBM practice) b. Implementation of PPAs such as: - Reading Program - Brigada Eskwela - Gulayan sa Paaralan - Feeding Program-Nutritional Status (baseline and end) Must include other PPAs not mentioned above
  10. These are the documents for MOVs 1-4 in levels 1-3 1. Copy of the received letter of invitation to the stakeholders in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation during the periodic performance assessment and review 4. Filed copy of the summary of findings during the performance assessment and review Approved Adjusted AIP is to be looked for in level 3 as additional document to see the progression. So these are all the MOVS for the five main Indicators in Principle 3,ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT THANK YOU FOR LISTENING. GOD BLESS US ALL! Thank you for listening, and again, good morning.
  11. These are the documents for MOVs 1-4 in levels 1-3 1. Copy of the received letter of invitation to the stakeholders in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 2. Memorandum on the different committees involved in the conduct of periodic performance assessment and review 3. Minutes of the meeting with photo documentation during the periodic performance assessment and review 4. Filed copy of the summary of findings during the performance assessment and review Approved Adjusted AIP is to be looked for in level 3 as additional document to see the progression. So these are all the MOVS for the five main Indicators in Principle 3,ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT THANK YOU FOR LISTENING. GOD BLESS US ALL! Thank you for listening, and again, good morning.