This document provides details about a lesson plan on verbal autopsy presented by Dr. P. Sujitha to 204 students. The plan includes an introduction to verbal autopsy, its history and uses, components of a verbal autopsy instrument, and the role of verbal autopsy in maternal death review. Verbal autopsy is used as a research tool to determine probable causes of death in places without reliable death registration or medical records. It involves interviewing family members about symptoms before death. The data collected is used by researchers, policymakers, and health programs.
Call Girls Chandigarh 👙 7001035870 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Verbal autopsy
1. VERBAL AUTOPSY
Dr.P.Sujitha, Post Graduate
Guide: Dr.R.Umadevi, Professor
Dr.N.B.Swetha,Assistant Professor
Department of Community medicine
1
2. LESSON PLAN
◦ Name of the lecturer: Dr. P. Sujitha
◦ Date: 19.08.2020 Time: 60 minutes
◦ No. of. Students: 204 Subject: Community Medicine
◦ Topic: VERBAL AUTOPSY
General objective: At the end of the session, the audience should
be able to describe the concept of verbal autopsy and its role in
death review
Specific learning objectives: At the end of the session, the
audience should be able to
1. Describe the concept of verbal autopsy
2. List the uses and users of verbal autopsy
3. Describe the components of Verbal autopsy instrument
4. Discuss the role of verbal autopsy in death review
2
3. S.No Content Method and Media Duration
1 INTRODUCTION Narration and LCD
projector
10 mins
2 HISTORY Narration and LCD
projector
5 mins
3 USES AND USERS OF VERBAL
AUTOPSY
Narration and LCD
projector
10 mins
4 VERBAL AUTOPSY INSTRUMENT Narration and LCD
projector
15 mins
5 ROLE OF VERBAL AUTOPSY IN
MATERNAL DEATH REVIEW
Narration and LCD
projector
10 mins
6 SUMMARY Discussion 10 mins
3
5. Introduction
5
Death registration
It is a mandatory document issued by registrar that declares
time, date and location of death and is entered in an official
register of deaths
Reported by any personnel with the concerned local
authorities, by filling up the forms prescribed by the Registrar.
Death certification
It is the official recording of persons death with cause of
death as stated by doctor or another responsible health
worker
This legal document is issued by medical professional
which states time, date, cause of death.
6. 21.1%
6
Office of Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India
7. Need for mortality survey
◦ To have a count of all deaths
◦ To ascertain the cause of deaths
◦ These reliable data on causes of mortality lay
cornerstones for building solid evidence base for
health policy, planning, monitoring and evaluation.
7
AM Kadri. IAPSM’s Textbook of Community Medicine
9. 9
Office of Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India
10. Sample Registration
System
SRS was initiated in mid 1960 to provide
reliable estimates of births and deaths and covers
the entire country
SRS is the single most important source of data
on annual demographic indicators including deaths
in country.
10
Park K. Textbook of Preventive and Social medicine 25th edition.
11. Sample Registration
System
SRS is carried out by Office of Registrar General and Census
Commissioner under Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India
Objectives of SRS are to provide
Reliable estimates of birth rate, death rate at National level for
major States and at State level for Districts
Data for other measures of fertility and mortality at higher
geographical levels
Ideas about various heath programs like family welfare,
epidemic control, MCH etc
AM Kadri. IAPSM’s Textbook of Community Medicine 11
12. Sample Registration System
SRS is a dual record system
1. Continuous enumeration of births and deaths at National and
State level done by enumerator
2. Independent survey every 6 months by an investigator
supervisor at District level
◦ Both the data are matched
◦ Every unmatched or partially matched data is again verified by
visit to the respective household where the cause of death is
also recorded using verbal autopsy instrument
12
Park K. Textbook of Preventive and Social medicine 25th edition.
13. Verbal autopsy
Verbal autopsy is a research method that helps
determine probable causes of death in
populations without a complete vital registration
system and in cases where there is no medical
record or formal medical attention given.
13
AM Kadri. IAPSM’s Textbook of Community Medicine
14. Objective
Verbal autopsy helps to determine the cause of
death
At community level
Where there was no medical record
No formal medical attention is given
In developing countries where vital registration is
poor
14
AM Kadri. IAPSM’s Textbook of Community Medicine
15. Verbal autopsy
• Verbal autopsy used to ascertain the cause of a death based
on an interview with next of kin or other caregivers.
• The interview is done using a standardized questionnaire that
elicits information on :
Signs, symptoms
medical history
circumstances preceding death.
15
AM Kadri. IAPSM’s Textbook of Community Medicine
16. Historical background
• In Europe, before the 19th century when modern
systems of death registration were implemented,
designated dead searchers visited the households
of deceased people to assess the nature of deaths.
16
17. • As an alternative, in the 1950s and 60s in Asia and
Africa, systematic interviews by physicians were
used to determine causes of death.
• As early as the 1950s lay reporting were employed
in countries with low coverage of medical access.
• In 1971, Two research projects were conducted in
Narangwal village in India were they named this
new technique “verbal autopsy”
17
The Narangwal nutrition study: a summary review. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1978 Nov 1;31(11):2040-52.
18. • During 1970s, WHO continued to encourage lay reporting of
health information by people with no medical training, in such
settings and in 1975 an official lay reporting form was established.
• In 2007, needs and demands for standardization led to the 2007
publication of the WHO Verbal Autopsy standards.
• In 2012, WHO brought about standardised questionnaire to use
• Now verbal autopsy standard 2016 guidelines are in routine use
18
Verbal autopsy standards – WHO: www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbal_autopsy
19. Verbal autopsy in India
Until December 1998, cause of death data for rural areas
used to be collected under the Survey of Cause of Death
Rural scheme, from a sample of villages by lay diagnosis
and reporting system.
From January 1999, a cause of death component was
merged with the SRS.
After an initial pilot, in 2001 , the Government of India initiated a
process of doing verbal autopsy (VA) of about 45,000 deaths
(0.5% of all annual deaths) identified under SRS every year.
19
21. • One of the largest studies of premature mortality in the world.
• In collaboration with the ORGI, MDS monitored nearly 14 million people in
2.4 million nationally representative households in India between 1998-
2014
• Any deaths that occur in these households during this period were
assigned a probable cause, as determined by verbal autopsy.
• The results for the leading causes of death in India were provided to
governments, research agencies, and media so that they can take
action against preventable deaths.
21
Million Death Study (MDS):http://www.cghr.org/projects/million-death-study-project/
22. Uses of verbal autopsy
22
Verbal autopsy standards – WHO: www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbal_autopsy
First, it has been primarily used as a research tool
Second, it has become a source of cause of death
statistics for population level cause-specific mortality
data to be used in policy, planning, priority setting.
Third, this data is used for monitoring progress and
evaluating the programme.
23. Users of verbal autopsy
Potential users of data generated through VA are
Researchers
Epidemiologists
Global-level decision-makers
National and sub-national decision-makers
Health system managers
23
Verbal autopsy standards – WHO: www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbal_autopsy
24. Verbal autopsy instruments
Components of verbal autopsy instruments
1) Questionnaire
2) List of causes of death
3) Sets of diagnostic criteria for assigning causes of
death
24
Verbal autopsy standards – WHO: www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbal_autopsy
25. Questionnaire
VA Forms
28 days or less
Fill Form 10A:
Neonatal deaths
29 days to 14
years
Fill Form 10B:
Child deaths
15 years or more
Fill Form 10C:
Adult deaths
Female 15-49
years
Fill Form 10D:
Maternal deaths
25
Verbal autopsy standards – WHO: www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbal_autopsy
26. Questionnaire
The standard content will include-
◦ Unique ID or reference number for the VA questionnaire
◦ Date, place and time of the interview and identification of the
interviewer
◦ Key characteristics of the respondent
◦ Details of the deceased
The time, place and date of death
The name, sex and age of the deceased
The cause(s) of death and events leading to death according to the
respondent
26
27. Questionnaire
Sections of a standard Verbal Autopsy Questionnaire
◦ Sections 1 and 2 contain key identifying and socio-demographic
information.
◦ Section 3 provides essential information for assigning the cause of
death.
◦ Section 4 provides background information on deaths that occur in
non-enumerated populations.
◦ Section 5 includes an open narrative text field that allows for
comments and adding additional information
27
The 2014 WHO Verbal autopsy Instrument. Available athttp://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbalautopsystandards
28. 28
The 2014 WHO Verbal autopsy Instrument. Available athttp://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbalautopsystandards
29. CAUSE OF DEATH
WHO defines COD as
The disease which initiated the train of events leading
directly to death
OR
The circumstances of the accident or violence which
produced the fatal injury
29
30. Cause of death
Order the events in a chronological sequence.
The underlying cause of death is NOT:
The Mode of death: Eg: Respiratory/heart failure
OR
Contributory cause of death:
Eg: Diabetes before stroke
30
31. Cause of Death Assignment
◦ Cause-of-death registration in the context of verbal autopsy
aims to assign a single underlying cause of death.
◦ In order to collect reliable and useful statistical information,
each step must be performed in a standard fashion.
◦ As much as possible, try to code the underlying cause of death
& not the risk factor.
31
33. Cause of Death
Example: Measles
Code for infectious disease as cause of death-VAs-
01.06 and ICD code-B05
33
34. ICD-10 codes for cause of
death list for VA 2016
• VAs-01 Infectious and parasitic diseases
• Non-communicable diseases
• VAs-02 Neoplasms
• VAs-03 Nutritional and endocrine disorders
• VAs-04 Diseases of the circulatory system
• VAs-05 Respiratory disorders
• VAs-06 Gastrointestinal disorders
• VAs-07 Renal disorders
• VAs-08 Mental and nervous system disorders
• VAs-09 Pregnancy-, childbirth and puerperium-related
• VAs-10 Neonatal causes of death
• VAs-11 Stillbirths
• VAs-12 External causes of death
35. 2016 cause of death list for verbal autopsy with
corresponding ICD-10 codes
36. • Earlier, two Physicians review of the questionnaires, andthe signs
and symptoms and then classify the cause of death without any
validation sample
• This approach was expensive and time consuming
• Another method of V
Adata analysis which is currentlyand
mostly in use is using computer algorithm.
• When the data from the questionnaire is inputted into the
computer, the data is analyzed and possible cause of deathis
displayed.
• It is more easier and less time consuming.
36
37. Sets of diagnostic criteria for
assigning causes of death.
Softwares’ are used for automated interpretation of VA
Currently, the two most commonly used programs are the
• InterVA method developed by the Umea University
(Sweden)
• Tariff method (SmartVA) developed by the Institute of
Health Metrics and Evaluation (USA).
37
38. Example
Adult female, aged 63
Narrative: Respondent thought person died of “unconscious”. This 63 year
old female had two years ago an attack on one side of the body in which
she could not move and her tongue was twisted also. She was seen by a
doctor at the hospital who gave her some blood thinner drugs and then
said all that could be done would be is to put her into a nursing home.
Reluctantly her son agreed. One month ago, she went unconscious and
then one day had a cough with high fever. She was drooling from her
mouth. Doctors gave her more intravenous medications, but she got worse
and died. She had no other past medical problems except for some blood
pressure in the past (she had not taken medications for a while).
38
39. Steps 1 and 2: Carefully read past medical history & narrative
AND highlight cardinal symptoms & negative evidence. Note
keywords. Consider diagnostic information provided:
Cardinal symptoms:
◦ “Got pneumonia while passed out” – Aspiration
Bronchopneumonia
◦ “unconsciousness” – prolonged coma
◦ “Paralysis on one side of the body” – preceding a stroke
Keywords include:
◦ “attack on one side”, “tongue twisted”, “blood pressure”,
“unconscious”
39
40. ◦ Step 3: Think of chronological sequence. Adhere to cardinal symptoms
& negative evidence. Do not imagine facts which are not in the record.
◦ Sequence of events:
“Got pneumonia while passed out”
“unconscious”
“Paralysis on one side of the body”
Step 4: Choose underlying cause of death. Select specific ICD code &
confirm against guidelines. Here Stroke/CVA (I64) is chosen.
40
41. Step 5: Reconsider ICD code using differential
diagnoses:
• Ischemic heart disease (I20- I25)
• Falls (W00-W19)
No history of chest discomfort possibly rules out
Ischemic heart disease and no history of falls
rules out the fall
41
42. Medical Certification of Cause
of death
42
Stroke/CVA
Pneumonia- Respiratory failure
Hypertension
45. Role of Verbal Autopsy in
Maternal Death Review - India
45
46. Role of verbal autopsy in
Maternal death review
NOTIFICATION
◦ Notification of maternal deaths within 24hours
◦ Notification includes all pregnancy related deaths
including suicides, accidents
◦ Use of semi structured VA format to conduct
community based audit and field based review of
each maternal death by PHC medical officer
46
49. District VA meeting
District collectors conduct the meeting once a month
All maternal deaths occurred during the past one month are
reviewed
All the service providers including the private service providers,
district health managers and relatives of the diseased
participate in VA meeting to discuss the findings
The various delays, barriers in accessing care, delay in
providing care and quality of care are discussed
49
Guidelines for Maternal death Surveillance & Response
50. Later the service providers are sensitised about the various
delays and the quality of care
All the contributory factors for each maternal death are
analysed
The minutes of the meeting sent to commissioner MCH and
Welfare every month
Common factors are identified and informed to State level for
policy changes
50
53. MINErVA-Mortality in India
established through Verbal Autopsy
◦ Online system inaugurated in Delhi AIIMS to provide
data on cause of death
◦ 19th November 2018 , online VA form coding platform
◦ Provide support for SRS
◦ Enables physicians to review the VA form and enter
the COD in the form of a standard international code
sitting at their office
53
MINErVA Coding Platform: http://minervacoding.aiims.edu/
54. Two online IT platforms
• A training platform
• which is in public domain meant for training of
physicians in ascertaining cause of death from
VAs
• A coding platform
• which is for network members to code
deaths identified under SRS based on the
VAforms.
54
MINErVA Coding Platform: http://minervacoding.aiims.edu/
55. • As of August 2019, Departments of Community
Medicine of 25 government and private medical
colleges from across the country are part of the
MINErVA network and have together enrolled 804
physician coders.
• The MINErVA Technical Advisory Group consists of
• Public health experts/ Clinicians
• Social scientists
• Statisticians
• Nominees from ORGI
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
• WHO
• Indian Council of Medical Research.
55
MINErVA Coding Platform: http://minervacoding.aiims.edu/
56. SWOT Analysis of VA
STRENGTHS
VA instrument facilitates the use of analytical
software for assigning the cause of death
The systematic application of VA instrument will
facilitate the application of VA in routine
surveillance systems and introduce more
consistency and cross comparability of mortality
data.
56
57. SWOT Analysis of VA
WEAKNESS
Adding or removing questions will impact the
comparability of data but also may compromise the
usability of analytical software for assigning cause of
death.
It may not be possible to use the existing analytical
software for assigning the newly added causes of death.
Although it may not be an accurate method for
attributing causes of death at the individual level
57
58. SWOT Analysis of VA
OPPURTUNITIES
The application of VA instrument in routine use and
research with its standardized international set of
questions will facilitate the compilation of
databases that finally would provide the evidence
for stepwise improvement of verbal autopsy
questionnaire internationally, and become a basis for
continuous development of analytical methods.
58
59. SWOT Analysis of VA
THREATS
The quality of information on the diagnosis varies
depending on the skills of the interviewer and the
memory of the respondents.
59
60. Summary
Verbal autopsy is a research method that helps to determine
probable causes of death
Done using a standardized questionnaire
Conducted as a component of SRS
Separate forms for each group covering all age groups
A cause-of-death list for verbal autopsy prepared according to
the ICD-10.
Used as a research tool for policy making, planning, monitoring
and evaluation.
Used as an essential substitute for medical certification of
cause of death.
60
61. Reference
Park K. Textbook of Preventive and Social medicine 25th
edition.
AM Kadri. IAPSM’s Textbook of Community Medicine
The 2014 WHO Verbal autopsy Instrument. Available at
http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbalautopsystandards
Verbal autopsy standards – WHO:
www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbal_autopsy
Report On Medical Certification Of Cause Of Death 2017
https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-
Documents/mccd_Report1/MCCD_Report-2017.pdf
MINErVA Coding Platform: http://minervacoding.aiims.edu/
61
62. Reference
Guidelines for Maternal death Surveillance &
Response:https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/programmes/maternal-
health/guidelines/Guideline_for_MDSR.pdf
Million Death Study (MDS):http://www.cghr.org/projects/million-death-
study-project/
National Centre for Disease Information and Research,ICMR,e-
Mortality: https://ncdirindia.org/e-mor/
Office of Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. Ministry of
Home Affairs, Government of India: https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-
Common/orgi_divisions.html
Kielmann AA, Taylor CE, Parker RL. The Narangwal nutrition study: a
summary review. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1978 Nov
1;31(11):2040-52.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/102180/
62
History
Users of verbal autopsy
Verbal autopsy instrument
Role of verbal autopsy in sample registration system and maternal and child death review
Set induction : mortality
How are mortality registered
Child death and causes ref you tube vdo
Put graph
Death od a child occurinhg in an urban hospital setting and death od child occuring in a tribal area
What is the Difference between death occurring at hospital vs death occurring at home?
1Accessibilty to health services
2.They will get medical attention
2.Cause of death can be elicited
3.Medical certification of death is issued
Death reg is done in corporation
Death certification in hospital
Are the terms deathreg n death certification same r diff?
To beggin with ,
How does death registration happen in urban areas vs rrural areas
In urban area hosp, consultatnt provides
In urban house if cod is suspicious autopys, or any physicaian who has last senthe deceased provides med certificat
In rural or trivbal area were no accesibility is available , or were no med attention is given they death reg is done but thr is no death certiifiction.
With this intriduction lets get into the terms of knowing abt death reg and death cerification
As mwe saw in the previous slide, death in an area were medical accessibilty is available death certified and then reg within 21 days
Wereas at villlage level rdeaths at homea are more common so they death form is taken from the village head or registrat authority and registration is done without med certificitio n so the cod remains unknown.
Wer do u think in the previous picture reg reg will occur and wer wil death ceridifcatiob occur
Death at hospital vs death at urban home vs death at rual vs death at tribal
How are deaths certified to them
What is registered death vs certified death
The death has to be registered within 21 days of its occurrence with the concerned local authorities, by filling up the forms prescribed by the Registrar. The certificate is then issued after proper verification.
If it occurs in a house, the head of the family should report it
If it occurs in a hospital, the medical in-charge should report it
if it occurs in a jail, the jail in-charge should report it
in case the body is found deserted in an area, it should be reported by the headman of the village or the in-charge of the local police station
21.1% of the deaths are medically certified to the total number of medically registered deaths
Out of total registered deaths only 21.1 percent of deaths are medicallu certified
Why is this huge gap present?? Majority of deaths in India do not take place at hospitals especially in rural and tribal areas.
As per 2011 census urban rural pop is 30% urban
Why do we need mortality data?
4.
CHANGE THE 2018 UPDATED DATA
You tube vdo data
In india
The Office of the Registrar General, India (ORGI) conducts the Sample Registration System (SRS) in a sampling frame composed of sample units (village or segment of a village in rural areas and census enumeration block in urban areas) spread across the country in order to provide reliable annual estimates of fertility, mortality and other indicators at the natural division level for rural areas and at the state level for urban areas.
Wat are some sources of heath statistis
1.Censis
2.Civil reg
3.Sample registration
India takes 2 sorces crs and srs. In crs any death occuring in hosp or urban home is certiifed by a med prof n within 21 days registered with the cporporation mccd or death repory
But as we saw earlier most f deaths in india do not occur in hosp, VCRS is not suufient and india lacks in CRS. So the syspen adopyed in SRS
National Centre for Disease Information and Research,ICMR,e-Mortality: https://ncdirindia.org/e-mor/
Census
Civil registration systems
Sample Registration System
Population-based reporting systems
Demographic surveys.
Reproductive Age Mortality Studies (RAMOS)
Annual survey
Why are mortality survey done?
To count all the deaths
To ascertain the cause of deaths in all of them or a representative subsample
What is SRS/
Methods of mortality data collection methods
Civil registration systems
Population-based reporting systems
Demographic surveys.
Reproductive Age Mortality Studies (RAMOS)
Census
Annual survey
Sample Registration System
Why are mortality surveillance done?
It has two components –
To count all the deaths
To ascertain the cause of deaths in all of them or a representative subsample
Limitations with the MCCD:
Coverage.
Majority of deaths in India do not take place at hospitals especially in rural and tribal areas.
Reporting under MCCD
Hospital deaths are certified by a doctor under MCCD.
As per ORGI in 2015, only about 20% of the reported deaths and 14% of all deaths were medically certified.
In india all dealths are reg under Medical certification of cause of death
Eg fertility indicators
CENSUS ONCE IN 1O YEARS
CRS DEFICIENT IN INDIA
SRS DUAL ROLE
Implementatiojn or changes in improvement of hrlth [rogras
Verbal autopsy: oral aytopsy: causse of dearth: orally evaluationg the cause of death
IAPSM
Reliable data on the levels ad causes of mortality are cornerstones for building solid evidence bse for health policy,planning,monitoring and evealuation.in settings were the mjority of deaths occurs at home and where vrs do not function,there is little chance that deaths occuring away from health facilities will be recorded and certified as to the cause or causes of death.as a solutionn to fill this gaop, va has become a primary source of imformation about causes of death in populations lacking vital registrations and medical certification.
Afcria nad asia, physicans used systematic intervies
to doc prob cod
Naragwal project 1972
Who dev lay reporting forms in 1975 by non medical people
May other qs were fored by resercheers ramos,niakhar
VA hass been included in official mortality data collection systen in may countries inclusing india, brazil, bangadesh and srilanka to provide cause specoific mortality faxction
At the population level.the cod inf in india is poor particularly in rural areas due to the shortage of medical personaels and facilities
Most people do not die in health facilitires so cod data based on the medical certification of cod is insuffiecnt to represent the whole country accurately.to overcome this gap va was introduced as a part of the srs in india.this was statered in 2001 and has been providing excellent cod data in india since then.
Is to describe the causes of death at the community level
In places where civil registration and death certification systems are weak
Where most people die at home without having had contact with the health system.
Relative very close too the deaceasesd or one who was with the deceased dring the incidennt
The term verbal autopsy was first coined in a project of the department of International Health of Johns Hopkins school of hygiene and public health which ran from 1965 to 1973 in Punjab, India.
What is lay reporting? Local govt official, scholl teacher, community worker,social worker or housewife wth appropriat eeducation who provides to the moniyor the health situattioon in the community NAND TO PLAN AND MANAGE HEALTH ACTIVITIES
Narangwal
Two research projects were located in villages near Ludhiana, with headquarters in Narangwal village. Objectives of the projects were.
To assess the relationship between nutrition, infection and child development.
Acceptance of family planning services by rural communities in response to maternal and early child care service packages.
In 1971, results from nutrition villages showed no significant decrease in child mortality and circumstances of child deaths remained largely unknown.
In response, an information system was established, where in all child deaths in the villages had to be reported to the Narangwal project officer.
One of the project physicians then went to the concerned family and through intense questioning of close relatives as to signs and symptoms of the process leading to death, established possible cause of death.
Using this method, 45 deaths due to diarrhoeal disease, lower respiratory tract infection and malnutrition were identified as the principle causes of death among 8 days to 3 year old child. Among the 45, one had neonatal tetanus.
Following implementation of different treatment schedules, child mortality rates dropped significantly by 40% in specific input villages over the period of study.
In 2007, needs and demands for standardization led to the 2007 publication of the WHO VA standards.
With further changed standard 2012,14,16 are updated.
2016 is in routine use
The past two decades have seen a proliferation of interest, research and development in all aspects of the VA process, including
VA data-collection systems,
VA questionnaires’ content and format,
Cause of death assignment process,
Coding and tabulation of causes of death,
Validation of VA instruments.
Currently, the two most commonly used programs are the InterVA method and the Tariff method. In order to facilitate the comparative analysis of methodologies and permitting use of both publicly available software based methods, the WHO VA instrument has been updated in 2014
1.Naragwala project
2.Millliom death study
The Million Death Study (MDS) is one of the largest studies of premature mortality in the world. The MDS is an ongoing study that is conducted in India, where, like most low- and middle-income countries, the majority of deaths occur at home and without medical attention. As a result, the majority of global deaths do not have a certified cause.
In collaboration with the Registrar General of India, the MDS will monitor nearly 14 million people in 2.4 million nationally representative households in India. Any deaths that occur in these households during this period will be assigned a probable cause, as determined by a method called verbal autopsy.
The results for the leading causes of death in India will be provided to governments, research agencies, and media as they become available so that they can take action against preventable deaths.
http://www.cghr.org/projects/million-death-study-project/
Centre for global health research
First, it has been primarily used as a research tool in the context of longitudinal population studies, intervention research or epidemiological studies.
Second, it has become a source of cause of death statistics to meet the demand for population level cause-specific mortality data to be used in policy, planning, priority setting.
Third, VA data are gaining acceptance as a source of cause of death statistics to be used for monitoring progress and evaluating the programme.
Potential users of data generated through VA
Researchers, epidemiologists and global-level decision-makers want VA data to inform burden of disease estimation and program evaluation, implying that cause of death estimates must meet high accuracy standards and be comparable over time and across countries.
National and sub-national decision-makers and health system managers require cause of death data for planning, budgeting and resource allocation and for monitoring and reporting to donors, implying that VA data needs to be actionable and program relevant.
2016 WHO VA instrument
It is intended to allow for simple and inexpensive identification of causes of death in places where no other routine system is in place and will serve the needs of countries’ civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems.
Independently, this instrument can also be used in research and disease specific programmes
Intended for strengthening national vital statistics systems
The systematic application of the 2016 WHO VA instrument will facilitate the application of VA in routine surveillance of vital events and introduce more consistency and crosscomparability of VA-derived mortality data.
The application of the 2016 Instrument in routine use and research with its standardized international set of questions will facilitate the compilation of larger databases that finally would provide the evidence for stepwise improvement of VA questionnaires internationally, and become a basis for continuous development of analytical methods.
2012 and 2014 WHO VA instrument comprises a short list of causes of death of public health importance that can be ascertained by using a standard questionnaire.
Cause of death list can be obtained using ICD-10 classification and codes.
Sample VA questionnaire 1: death of a child aged under four weeks
The purpose of VAQ 1 is to distinguish among
stillbirths,
early neonatal deaths
late neonatal deaths and
to determine causes of those perinatal events and deaths.
Also contains questions concerning the history of the pregnancy, delivery, the condition of the baby soon after birth, and the mother’s health.
Sample VA questionnaire 2: death of a child aged four weeks to 14 years
the major causes of post-neonatal child mortality as well as causes of death that may be seen through 14 years of age.
questions related to causes of death in children aged four weeks to11 months and pregnancy related questions for 12 to 14 year old female children
Sample VA questionnaire 3: death of a person aged 15 years and above to identify all major causes of death among adolescents and adults including deaths related to pregnancy and childbirth.
The questionnaire includes an extensive module for all female deaths.
Includes a module on behavioural risk factors (e.g. alcohol and tobacco consumption).
The instrument is designed for all age groups, including maternal and perinatal deaths, and also deaths caused by injuries.
Sample questionnaires are provided for three age groups (under four weeks; 4weeks-14 years, 15 years and above).
It is reshaped to be answered with Yes or NO .
Unique variable identifiers and notes for translators and interviewers facilitate the translation of the instrument in the desired language.
Other standard modules include:
History of previously known medical conditions (of the deceased or of the mother)
History of injury or accident
Treatment and health service use during the period of final illness
The standard content will include-
A unique ID, control or reference number for the VA questionnaire
The date, place and time of the interview and identity of the interviewer
Key characteristics of the respondent
The time, place and date of death
The name, sex and age of the deceased
The cause(s) of death and events leading to death according to the respondent
Other standard modules include:
History of previously known medical conditions
(of the deceased or of the mother)
History of injury or accident
Treatment and health service use during the period of final illness
Cause of death list can be obtained using ICD-10 classification and codes
Step 1: Identify the cause of death.
Step 2: Certify the death
Step 3: Code the causes of death.
Step 4: Select the underlying cause of death.
Cause of death certification and coding resources consistent with the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, tenth revision (ICD-10); and
A cause-of-death list for verbal autopsy prepared according to the ICD-10
Softwares are used
Currently, the two most commonly used programs are the
InterVA method developed by the Umea University (Sweden)
Tariff method (SmartVA) developed by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (USA).
Automated interpretation of VA
To facilitate the application of the two commonly used and publicly available automated methods for interpreting VA
To allow comparison the causes of death data determined by these methods comparative analysis of these commonly used automated methods of VA interpretation,
What is maternal death:
What is maternal death?
According to WHO, a maternal death is defined as the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and site of pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its managemnet but not from accidental or incidental causes
Approaches to measuring maternal mortality
CRS
Household survey
Sisterhood survey
RAMOS
Verbal autopsy
Census
MDSR Maternal death surveillance and response
Why so many md occur
Is it because they are unaware of the need for care or unaware of the warning signs?
Is it because services do no exists or inaccedible due to distance, cost or socio cultural barriers?
Is it bbecause they receive sub standard care1?
Wat are the reasons for de;lya?
# delay framework
Delay in seeking care
Delay in arriving at the approprooiate level of care
Delay in getting adequate treatment after reaching the institution
Park page 614: from 2000, SRS included a new method RHIME: Representative,Re sampled, Routine household interview of Mortality with Medical Evaluation
It is enhanced form of verbal autopsy
RHIME includes random re sampling of field work by an independent team for maintaining quality of data
LHV/BPHN: lady health visitior,
It was launched to provide data on the COD in the country which helps the government plan and monitor the effcetiveness of its health programmes.
Provide support for SRS which is the sinlgle most important souse of data on annual demographic indicators including deaths in county.
Verbal autopsy is a method used in determining the cause specific mortality.
It is used mostly in developing countries where vital registration is poor.
It has undergone modifications since it inception and currently, the WHO 2012 verbal autopsy standard instrument is used.
Verbal autopsy is a research method that helps to determine probable causes of death
At community level
where there was no medical record
Formal medical attention given
in developing countries where vital registration is poor.
Done using a standardized questionnaire
A cause-of-death list for verbal autopsy prepared according to the ICD-10.
Used as a research tool for policy making, planning, monitoring and evaluation.
Used as an essential substitute for medical certification of cause of death.
IAPSM
Va
The cod is known through interviewing family or community memebers by trained personnel.the information obtained is interpretted by physicians as medical causes and classified.it is useful oin cases where medical certification of cod is not available
The 2014 WHO Verbal autopsy Instrument. Available at http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbalautopsystandards.
Dr. K. Mony Prem :Verbal autopsy.St Johns Medical College and Research Institute.India;2014
Verbal Autopsy (VA) | Institute for Health Metrics and www.healthdata.org/verbal-autopsy
Verbal Autopsy Methods with Multiple
Causes of - Gary Kinggking.harvard.edu/files/vamc.pdfWhat is Verbal Autopsy? www.cghr.org
Verbal autopsy standards – WHO
www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/verbal_autopsy
Office of Registrar General &Census Commisioner,India.Ministry of Home Affairs,Government of India:
1.Mmr n imr sdg
India:2030:122to 70/1L livebirths(2017)
U5= 37/1000LB (2017)-25/1000LB
MMR 2015: 130/1L LB,
IMR : 2017: 39.4
2.Evaluation vs monitoring: monitoring takes place while the activity is being undertaken, evelaution takes place at the end
Input-process-outout
Prosess methods follow _ monitoring
Output assesseing _ evaluation
3..say updates on yes or no questions so it can be easy for making