![Why don’t people test? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Featured
Featured (20)
User Testing (the UX mic check)
- 1. User Testing ( the UX mic check )
- 11. Encourage stakeholder observation (Creeeepy!)
Editor's Notes
- These things may be true To be successfully, need to room/time/expense for test Shouldn’t be after thought Part of original plan and budget We may use our products, but knowledge is too deep and have institutional bias Need to educate business and stakeholders about why it’s crucial (not easy)
- - UX people know their shit - Lots of standards, patterns, best practices Still, no well of telling if all the pieces are put together right unless product gets tested Like testing drugs. And like drugs, UX can still be faulty after it’s released. Continual improvement.
- - Lab setting - Formal - One-way mirror w/ observers - Testing script Dangers Sterile Artifical setting Users feel on the spot Expensive
- - Amazing and cheap way to get feedback. Tell story of how we did this Org was glad to have feedback w/o formality of lab Use social media to recruit
- Seeing is believing.
- ? And the mysterrians Singer has name legally changed to " ? ,” Never appeared in public without a pair of wraparound sunglasses; Claimed he had been born on Mars and lived among the dinosaurs in a past life, Voices from the future had revealed he would be performing "96 Tears" in the year 10,000. Now THAT’S future-looking!