Bridging the Gap: Sustaining Publication of a Newly Created Undergraduate Res...NASIG
Melissa Johnson, MLIS, MA
Assistant Professor
Assistant Director of Reference & Education Services
University Libraries, Reese Library
AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY
Once the excitement of creating a new journal has waned and publication has begun, a new challenge arises in sustainability. Augusta University first published their undergraduate research journal, Arsenal, through their institutional repository managed by the University Libraries in 2016. The Arsenal (ISSN 2380-5064 online) is a peer-reviewed, open-access interdisciplinary publication that is dedicated to publishing manuscripts resulting from Augusta University undergraduate research. Each paper published in the Arsenal undergoes a peer review process facilitated by the journal‘s Student Editorial Review Board and must be approved by an appointed faculty reviewer in the paper’s respective discipline. It is a student-run journal sponsored by the Center for Undergraduate Research & Scholarship (CURS) and published and managed by the University Libraries. The Arsenal serves as a great impetus for developing careers of nascent researchers.
Since the journal’s first publication in 2016, however, several unanticipated factors arose that have influenced continued publication. Some of these factors include changes on the student editorial board, faculty turnover, research agendas for mentoring faculty, and IRB requirements. Librarians from Augusta University will discuss some of the challenges that arose since initial publication and how the library adapted to these challenges. They will also discuss ways the library is bridging gaps to ensure continued publication of the journal, such as increasing marketing and promotion of the Arsenal to faculty and students, as well as developing further relationships with student organizations to ensure the Arsenal’s student-centered focus.
Collaboration To Support Student WritingSteve Lawson
Slides for a presentation given May 23, 2008 by Kaijsa Calkins, Carrie Forbes, and Steve Lawson at the Colorado Academic Library Summit, Denver. Slides put together by Carrie Forbes.
Bridging the Gap: Sustaining Publication of a Newly Created Undergraduate Res...NASIG
Melissa Johnson, MLIS, MA
Assistant Professor
Assistant Director of Reference & Education Services
University Libraries, Reese Library
AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY
Once the excitement of creating a new journal has waned and publication has begun, a new challenge arises in sustainability. Augusta University first published their undergraduate research journal, Arsenal, through their institutional repository managed by the University Libraries in 2016. The Arsenal (ISSN 2380-5064 online) is a peer-reviewed, open-access interdisciplinary publication that is dedicated to publishing manuscripts resulting from Augusta University undergraduate research. Each paper published in the Arsenal undergoes a peer review process facilitated by the journal‘s Student Editorial Review Board and must be approved by an appointed faculty reviewer in the paper’s respective discipline. It is a student-run journal sponsored by the Center for Undergraduate Research & Scholarship (CURS) and published and managed by the University Libraries. The Arsenal serves as a great impetus for developing careers of nascent researchers.
Since the journal’s first publication in 2016, however, several unanticipated factors arose that have influenced continued publication. Some of these factors include changes on the student editorial board, faculty turnover, research agendas for mentoring faculty, and IRB requirements. Librarians from Augusta University will discuss some of the challenges that arose since initial publication and how the library adapted to these challenges. They will also discuss ways the library is bridging gaps to ensure continued publication of the journal, such as increasing marketing and promotion of the Arsenal to faculty and students, as well as developing further relationships with student organizations to ensure the Arsenal’s student-centered focus.
Collaboration To Support Student WritingSteve Lawson
Slides for a presentation given May 23, 2008 by Kaijsa Calkins, Carrie Forbes, and Steve Lawson at the Colorado Academic Library Summit, Denver. Slides put together by Carrie Forbes.
Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to researchOCLC
Connaway, L. S. (2018). Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research. Presented at Bar-Ilan University, March 11, 2018, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to researchLynn Connaway
Connaway, L. S. (2018). Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research. Presented at Bar-Ilan University, March 11, 2018, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ithaka S+R | Jisc | RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012Jisc
The UK Survey of Academics 2012, conducted by Ithaka S+R, Jisc, and Research Libraries UK (RLUK), examines the attitudes and behaviours of academics at higher education institutions across the United Kingdom.
Reading lists the good, the bad and the uglyDavid Clover
Presentation used as part of workshop with academic staff on reading lists from a teaching and learning perspective. Includes overview of current research and differing approaches as starting point for discussion.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...OCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, April 7.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...Lynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, April 7.
Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academi...OCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Time of Uncertainty.” Presented at the RLUK Conference 2017, London, United Kingdom, March 9.
Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academi...Lynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Time of Uncertainty.” Presented at the RLUK Conference 2017, London, United Kingdom, March 9.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...OCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Macau, Macau, April 6.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...Lynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Macau, Macau, April 6.
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research AgendaLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda.” Presented at the ACRL 2017 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23.
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research AgendaOCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda.” Presented at the ACRL 2017 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23.
How'd You Do That? From one-shots to a minor in Information StudiesElizabeth Dolinger
LOEX 2020 with Irene McGarrity and Eric Shannon.
In this presentation, we describe our process of rethinking and reinventing our approach to information literacy instruction and developing a minor in Information Studies. Over two years we decreased librarian-taught one-shots, eliminated our ineffective liaison (non)program, collaborated with the Writing Center to provide peer-to-peer research and writing support, and developed train-the-trainer workshops for faculty. We describe the Information Studies curriculum, its connection to The Framework, and how teaching in the minor has impacted our self-perception and identity as librarians. We engage attendees in asking themselves the hard questions that we asked ourselves as we began to reinvent how we work.
Workshop for New Mexico Consortium of Academic LibrariesElizabeth Dolinger
Workshop held on August 1, 2019 for academic librarians, Deans, and Directors, addressing challenges of supporting college wide outcomes on information literacy and program design in academic libraries. We took participants through a series of questions we posed to ourselves as we made changes to our approach to information literacy at Keene State College and moved away from a traditional one-shot instruction focused program.
More Related Content
Similar to Tutoring Research & Writing @ New England Library Association 2019 powerpoint
Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to researchOCLC
Connaway, L. S. (2018). Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research. Presented at Bar-Ilan University, March 11, 2018, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to researchLynn Connaway
Connaway, L. S. (2018). Academic library impact: Improving practice and essential areas to research. Presented at Bar-Ilan University, March 11, 2018, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ithaka S+R | Jisc | RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012Jisc
The UK Survey of Academics 2012, conducted by Ithaka S+R, Jisc, and Research Libraries UK (RLUK), examines the attitudes and behaviours of academics at higher education institutions across the United Kingdom.
Reading lists the good, the bad and the uglyDavid Clover
Presentation used as part of workshop with academic staff on reading lists from a teaching and learning perspective. Includes overview of current research and differing approaches as starting point for discussion.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...OCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, April 7.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...Lynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, April 7.
Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academi...OCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Time of Uncertainty.” Presented at the RLUK Conference 2017, London, United Kingdom, March 9.
Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academi...Lynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Where are We Going and What Do We Do Next? Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Time of Uncertainty.” Presented at the RLUK Conference 2017, London, United Kingdom, March 9.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...OCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Macau, Macau, April 6.
Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Rese...Lynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni. 2017. “Demonstrating the Value of Academic Libraries in Times of Uncertainty: A Research Agenda for Student Learning and Success.” Presented at the University of Macau, Macau, April 6.
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research AgendaLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda.” Presented at the ACRL 2017 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23.
Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research AgendaOCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, William Harvey, Vanessa Kitzie, and Stephanie Mikitish. 2017. “Changing Tack: A Future-Focused ACRL Research Agenda.” Presented at the ACRL 2017 Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, March 23.
How'd You Do That? From one-shots to a minor in Information StudiesElizabeth Dolinger
LOEX 2020 with Irene McGarrity and Eric Shannon.
In this presentation, we describe our process of rethinking and reinventing our approach to information literacy instruction and developing a minor in Information Studies. Over two years we decreased librarian-taught one-shots, eliminated our ineffective liaison (non)program, collaborated with the Writing Center to provide peer-to-peer research and writing support, and developed train-the-trainer workshops for faculty. We describe the Information Studies curriculum, its connection to The Framework, and how teaching in the minor has impacted our self-perception and identity as librarians. We engage attendees in asking themselves the hard questions that we asked ourselves as we began to reinvent how we work.
Workshop for New Mexico Consortium of Academic LibrariesElizabeth Dolinger
Workshop held on August 1, 2019 for academic librarians, Deans, and Directors, addressing challenges of supporting college wide outcomes on information literacy and program design in academic libraries. We took participants through a series of questions we posed to ourselves as we made changes to our approach to information literacy at Keene State College and moved away from a traditional one-shot instruction focused program.
Where’s the Librarian? Expanding Beyond the Library Through Research & Techno...Elizabeth Dolinger
ACRL NEC 2015
Where’s the Librarian? Expanding Beyond the Library Through Research & Technology Peer Fellows
Elizabeth Dolinger (Keene State College), Irene McGarrity (Keene State College), Danielle Hoadley (Keene State College), Matthew McDougal (Keene State College)
Questioning the value and sustainability of librarian led research instruction sessions, as well as the librarian staffed reference desk, two librarians spear-headed the development of a student peer mentor training program to improve integration of information literacy across the curriculum and provide research and technology assistance at the library’s new student staffed Information Desk. During this session, student Research & Technology Fellows will share their experiences participating in the program and two librarians will share their experiences developing and managing the program through a self-paced, blended model of online modules in the Canvas course management system and face-to-face trainings
Liberal Education & America's Promise (LEAP) Initiative's Impact on Informati...Elizabeth Dolinger
Presented at ACRL National Conference in Indianapolis Indiana April 11, 2013. Research on the impact of the AAC&U's LEAP initiative on Information Literacy Programs in higher education.
I gave a one hour overview to librarians from NH about assessment. My approach to assessment focuses on collection of performance assessments, mapping session level outcomes to program outcomes, aggregating data by outcome, SHARING what you learn, and contributing to program level assessment. I plan for and organize assessment methods into “tiers” with tier one assessments capturing student development of information literacy from a variety of academic experiences, and tier two assessment methods capturing librarians contribution to students development of information literacy. One librarian asked me after the discussion: where should I begin, especially with limited access to students? My recommendation is always to start with what’s already being done. Where are students already being assessed? Look there and see what you can learn about the challenges students are having. Then create your plan, and “start small, but start” as Deb Gilchrist and other ACRL Immersion faculty always mantra.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pOxo0s29jsQw9PVr7fp1AA7HKeOL8T_YiupQjyZFpGM/edit?usp=sharing
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Tutoring Research & Writing @ New England Library Association 2019 powerpoint
1. Tutoring Research & Writing: A Tutors
Perspective on Providing Integrated Research and Writing
Services
Keene State College @ New England Library Association 2019
2. Overview of Keene State College
~3,500 students
40% first-generation
Public liberal arts
79 hrs/week at 2 locations (44 hrs @ library & 35 hrs @ Center)
12-15 student staff of Research & Writing Tutors
8. Teaching Research & Writing Workshops
● Intro to Center for Research & Writing
● Demystifying ITW (1st year research and writing course)
● Alternative to Wikipedia: CREDO & background research
● Searching Discovery & the library catalog
● Intro to Library Databases
● Characteristics of Academic Argument
● Incorporating Research Into Your Paper
● Reverse Outline
● How to Effectively Read and Edit Final Draft
● Types of Scholarly Articles & Literature Reviews
● Tracing Citations https://library.keene.edu/portal-research-writing/workshops
11. Questions & Contact
Elizabeth Dolinger
edolinger@keene.edu
Information Literacy
Librarian
Kate Tirabassi
ktirabassi@keene.edu
Director, Center for Writing
Emma Brown
Emma.Brown@ksc.keene.edu
Research & Writing Tutor
Marnie Anair
Marnie.Anair@ksc.keene.edu
Research & Writing Tutor
12. Photos:
Keene State College Arch: https://www.nhpr.org/post/keene-state-finances-stabilizing-after-turbulent-year#stream/0
Research: http://edulab.uoc.edu/en/links/internacional-seminar-evidence-based-research-methodological-approaches-and-practical-outcomes/
Writing: https://www.boardeffect.com/blog/best-practices-for-writing-a-board-resolution/
Editor's Notes
Elizabeth: Associate Professor and Information Literacy Librarian. I teach in the information studies program and co-coordinate the Center for Research and Writing.
Emma: I’m a Junior at KSC majoring in English and minoring in professional writing and Information studies. I’ve been working at the Center for Research and Writing and The Research and Writing Help Desk for a little over a year
Marnie: I am a Junior at KSC with a double major in Communications and Women’s and Gender Studies. I am also a part of the information studies minor and work as a research and writing tutor.
Emma: Basic stats about KSC and hours of services
~3,500 students 40% first-generation Public liberal arts
79 hrs/week at 2 locations (44 hrs @ library & 35 hrs @ Center)
12-15 student staff of Research & Writing Tutors and this year we have 14
Elizabeth: This is the story of integrating the library’s research services with the Center for Writing’s services - without being physically co-located.
2014 library moves away from a librarian-run reference desk
we developed a peer-to-peer model of offering research services = Research Fellows working at the desk and providing basic research workshops to classes.
I’d been working with the Director of the Center for Writing on various initiatives but we hadn’t moved beyond the librarian providing a few training sessions to their tutors.
Value of cross training became really evident when we had two tutors who happened to work for both of us but experienced the trainings individually. The tutors highlighted the cross-over of what they were doing and applicability in both areas.
Keene State has an integrative gen ed program - meaning that their approach to gen ed is based in the idea that learning crosses disciplinary silos and that experiences outside and inside the classroom inform learning in each.
So the integration of research and writing services from the library and the center for writing is how we can reflect that - and bring together these processes in the way that students actually experience them in practice.
2016 Started by merging all of our handouts and resources and creating a booklet for faculty of those resources.
Over the next year we began to integrate our trainings and then to co-hire students to work in both locations.
we now have a staff that is fully trained in research and writing (as some tutors graduated who were only trained in one or the other).
In spring 2018 To make the training sustainable financially, and also more consistent - we developed a course “Tutoring Research & Writing.” Its a general education course that incorporates writing center theory, information literacy and library skills, and some theory about research processes. It’s co-taught by myself and the center for writing director, Kate Tirabassi.
Any student can take the course, and you’re not necessarily guaranteed a position working - but we hire from this pool of students.
The tutors work in both locations - @ the Center (its own building) and at the desk in the library.
Just this semester we became the “Center for Research & Writing” and the Center for Research & Writing @ Mason Library.
But what really makes this story successful is our awesome tutors - they’re dedicated and interested in the practice of research, writing, and also tutoring and teaching. They really create the “center” and the community that thrives there - and that brings in more students than we’ve serviced before.
**Marnie and Emma
Emma: We have a research and writing help desk which is primarily for drop-in questions (like quick MLA formatting questions or questions on how to print), the center for research and writing which is 30 or 60 minute research and writing appointments, and then in-class research and writing workshops.
Because I was in the first class for the integration of both research and writing I don’t know what it is like to tutor without the knowledge I have about research. Through taking the course and from continuing as a research and writing tutor I know how crucial research is in the writing process. There are many times students come in for appointments to start an outline or brainstorm for their papers and as the appointment progresses I realize that what they really need is to do background research on their topics. (credo...mind map)
Marnie: Over the summer I worked at the research and writing help desk, and during that time I got to code all of our client feedback forms from the 2018-2019 academic year. The client feedback forms describe how the session went, and what was worked on. I did this by hand, as our data collecting system doesn’t allow for us to see what time of appointment it was explicitly, so instead I looked at the tutor feedback forms. Through this, I looked at each appointment feedback form, and determined if it was a research appointment, a writing appointment, or if it was both. ***show the slide with the chart*** This chart shows us that OVERALL THERE WERE 66 APPOINTMENTS THAT COVERED RESEARCH CONCEPTS. in the spring semester, there was almost 3 times as many research appointments than there was in the fall. When you look at this, you see that there is also less appointments that were both research and writing in the spring semester. This is likely because Fall 2018 was the first full semester of having integrated services. Because of this, students were more aware of our research services, and started to come in explicitly for that help, because they knew we provided it. We are hoping that this year the numbers of research based appointments continue to rise, as we have had many outreach initiatives.
****In comparison, in 2017-2018 there were only 14 scheduled research appointments in total, done mostly by librarians and a few by student Research Fellows. So the number of scheduled appointments addressing research concepts has increased by over 300% from 14 to 66 scheduled appointments. And this year we’ve already had 94 appointments - though only some of those would be covering research concepts.
ELIZABETH - We wanted to share this data about the desk interactions - while there was a noticeable decrease in activity at the desk during the 18-19 academic year (in purple) we know that we had some training challenges with tutors and data collection suffered so we believe the data for 18-19 are significantly lower than what actually occurred. BUT you’ll notice that this year we are set to double or even quadruple the numbers we’ve had in every category since 2017. These services are in addition to scheduled appointments and numbers of workshops which are kept track of in a separate data scheduler system, WC ONline.
Emma: This also goes off of what I was talking about earlier in terms of background research. Often times students come into tutoring appointments set on writing an outline or starting their papers, but what they don’t realize is that to start outlining and writing you need to have to be knowledgeable about your topic (background information). A lot of times students come in when their deadline is approaching soon so they just want to jump into writing or outlining which makes it hard to show them through databases and getting them to expand their knowledge on the topic.
Also for me I don’t even realize when I move from writing to research because it comes so naturally especially because I’ve been crossed trained so I don’t know what it is like to tutor without having the knowledge I do about research but because of this I’ve realized just how important it is for tutors at the writing center to be cross trained in both research and writing. I am really grateful to be cross trained and am excited to work with students on their entire writing process from introducing students to background research to helping them edit their final drafts.
Marnie: A lot of students come in to the center thinking that peer tutors are either going to tear their paper a part, and know everything that they could ever need. They also can come in thinking that we will write their paper for them, rather than us just guiding them in the right direction. Many students have also said they had been required to come in, and were dreading it, and left having had a great experience, and were excited to come back for more services.
Emma: We currently offer 11 different research and writing workshops. Because the integration of our services is so new we are using workshops from both services but are currently starting to combine research and writing workshops ( for example we are creating a workshop on plagiarism and citations). We also want to look into revising some of the workshops we have and combining more research and writing into them. For example, we can revisit our incorporating research into your paper workshop which is primarily writing based and add more research
Emma:
Over the summer I worked at the research and writing desk and one of my summer projects was to go through WCOnline (which is a scheduling program for our Center for Research and Writing) to see how many of each workshop we gave.
Total Workshops: 80 in 18-19 41 of which were research workshops
Academic year 17-18 we gave 22 research workshops
This fall semester 2019 we haven’t hit the busiest time yet and it looks like we will be doubling our number of research workshops by the end of the year
Marnie: Some of the benefits of having separate locations include:
-at the center, the space is more focused on research/writing, and has two private tutoring rooms, along with a writer's nook, which is a cozy room with couches, tables, and a smart board.
-In the library, there is more foot traffic, people are familiar with the space, and more people drop in for help.
Some of the drawbacks include:
-At the center, people are scared to come in, since it is a building they don’t normally go to, or have ever been to.
-At the desk, we get questions that are completely unrelated to our services (many are for the IT group, or just questions from local patrons)
-There is also less privacy at the desk for appointments, which can make students uneasy when looking at their writing.
We really believe in this model - I encourage any librarian to look at their Center for Writing and to work with the tutors. They are likely providing research guidance to students whether you’ve trained them or not and whether you want them to or not - because these processes are really integrated. Tutors have the opportunity for professionalism.
By integrating research and writing, by having one student staff cross-trained in providing both research and writing help - it is reflective of the actual process that students experience and engage in for their academic work. No longer do faculty have to work with both the library and the writing center - and - it recognizes and addresses student’s needs in the moment and where they are.
Further - its enhanced the experience of being a tutor. Its provided them more tools to use in their tutoring sessions. One senior tutor who had previously only been trained as a writing tutor, served as the TA for the training course (and therefore received the research training) commented how she wished she’s had these resources and understanding of the research process earlier in her tutoring career.