This document summarizes trial preparation techniques discussed at an in-service continuing legal education (CLE) seminar hosted by Adam Leitman Bailey, PC. It emphasizes the importance of thorough factual investigation and preparation before trial, including conducting discovery, investigating facts, selecting witnesses, gathering evidence, and being prepared for trial. Specific preparation techniques discussed include taking depositions, serving discovery demands, visiting the scene, researching witnesses and facts, selecting helpful witnesses, subpoenaing records and witnesses, and preparing expert witnesses.
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE! Deborah Swan
Charles Dyer was set up by a member of the ARM , American Resistance Movement, by giving him what appeared to be a grenade launcher. This type of weapon is legal for Charles to won do o his firearm military training. This is the case documents of his federal charge of having a stolen military weapon in his possession. Charles demanded a jury trial. The jury found Charles not guilty!
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE! Deborah Swan
Charles Dyer was set up by a member of the ARM , American Resistance Movement, by giving him what appeared to be a grenade launcher. This type of weapon is legal for Charles to won do o his firearm military training. This is the case documents of his federal charge of having a stolen military weapon in his possession. Charles demanded a jury trial. The jury found Charles not guilty!
Atlanta DUI lawyer Ben Sessions describes some issues that DUI defense attorneys should consider when they are facing challenging facts.
The Sessions Law Firm, LLC
1447 Peachtree St., Ste. 530
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: (470) 225-7710
Be prepared and gain a deeper understanding of Arizona civil lawsuits with this simple to understand guide. An in depth explanation of civil lawsuits in Arizona, including the stages of a lawsuit, and common terminology.
KEY ASSIGNMENT OUTLINEI. INTRODUCTION Scenario- In the c.docxDIPESH30
KEY ASSIGNMENT OUTLINE
I. INTRODUCTION:
Scenario- In the course of preparing for trial, I am told to get the audio tapes of evidence, but the original tapes cannot be found, and no one knows where the original tapes went. AUSA states that the case could be thrown out of court now. I have a working copy of the audio tape, and AUDA’s copies are scarcely perceptible. It seems there was some difficulty with the equipment used to record. So, I opt to check on information regarding the best evidence rule (Johnson, R. (2013).
II. BODY:
1. The Best Evidence Rule (Johnson, R. (2013).
A. mandates the initial record, picture, or taping be utilized as proof at the legal proceedings, as an alternative of a photocopy
B. duplicate permitted just if the original is unobtainable
C. pertains as soon as a person desires to declare the contents as evidence, except the original is not obtainable
D. the individual has to afford a satisfactory reason for its absence
E. provided the court of law finds the reason stipulated as satisfactory,
a. it is permitted to be applied as additional substantiation
b. in order to verify the documents substances
c. exists as allowable proof
F. is relevant just when a person pursues to exhibit the contents to be disclosed as evidence (LII, 2010)
2. Executed Into the U.S. Court System Was the Best Evidence Rule
A. is a deceiving label for the courts' first choice for genuine recordings, writings, and pictures instead of photocopies
B. The reason of this rule
a. circumvent the possibility of mistakes that can be in duplicates made by hand
b. existing statute covered in the Federal Rules of Evidence necessitates the usage of original recordings, writings, and pictures
c. including the majority of prints or photocopies taken from the same negative
d. inaccuracy risks from these forms of photocopies virtually does not exist
C. When the original evidence is ruined, unavailable, misplaced, or in the opponent’s control/ possession
a. the court of law will not necessitate an individual to come up with the original
b. the best evidence rule was initially needed before the digital age
c. duplicates of documents were made by hand.
d. errors were commonly made.
e. often the person to disclose the document into court was the same person who prepared the reproduction
f. deliberate "inaccuracies" were frequently made, when it would be to the person making the copy benefitted
g. legitimate answer was to necessitate the original be produced if a person sought to disclose it in court
(The Best-Evidence Rule, n. d.).
3. The Reasoning/Rationale Behind Its Application
A. also identified as the Original Document Rule
B. The underlying principle is logical
a. before, "a copy was typically made by a clerk, or a participant to the court case".
b. a greater chance of error or fraud if original was not supplied (Dicarlo, 2008).
4. Court Cases In Regards To Wiretapping
A. Olmstead v. United States 277 U.S. 4 ...
Atlanta DUI lawyer Ben Sessions describes some issues that DUI defense attorneys should consider when they are facing challenging facts.
The Sessions Law Firm, LLC
1447 Peachtree St., Ste. 530
Atlanta, GA 30309
Telephone: (470) 225-7710
Be prepared and gain a deeper understanding of Arizona civil lawsuits with this simple to understand guide. An in depth explanation of civil lawsuits in Arizona, including the stages of a lawsuit, and common terminology.
KEY ASSIGNMENT OUTLINEI. INTRODUCTION Scenario- In the c.docxDIPESH30
KEY ASSIGNMENT OUTLINE
I. INTRODUCTION:
Scenario- In the course of preparing for trial, I am told to get the audio tapes of evidence, but the original tapes cannot be found, and no one knows where the original tapes went. AUSA states that the case could be thrown out of court now. I have a working copy of the audio tape, and AUDA’s copies are scarcely perceptible. It seems there was some difficulty with the equipment used to record. So, I opt to check on information regarding the best evidence rule (Johnson, R. (2013).
II. BODY:
1. The Best Evidence Rule (Johnson, R. (2013).
A. mandates the initial record, picture, or taping be utilized as proof at the legal proceedings, as an alternative of a photocopy
B. duplicate permitted just if the original is unobtainable
C. pertains as soon as a person desires to declare the contents as evidence, except the original is not obtainable
D. the individual has to afford a satisfactory reason for its absence
E. provided the court of law finds the reason stipulated as satisfactory,
a. it is permitted to be applied as additional substantiation
b. in order to verify the documents substances
c. exists as allowable proof
F. is relevant just when a person pursues to exhibit the contents to be disclosed as evidence (LII, 2010)
2. Executed Into the U.S. Court System Was the Best Evidence Rule
A. is a deceiving label for the courts' first choice for genuine recordings, writings, and pictures instead of photocopies
B. The reason of this rule
a. circumvent the possibility of mistakes that can be in duplicates made by hand
b. existing statute covered in the Federal Rules of Evidence necessitates the usage of original recordings, writings, and pictures
c. including the majority of prints or photocopies taken from the same negative
d. inaccuracy risks from these forms of photocopies virtually does not exist
C. When the original evidence is ruined, unavailable, misplaced, or in the opponent’s control/ possession
a. the court of law will not necessitate an individual to come up with the original
b. the best evidence rule was initially needed before the digital age
c. duplicates of documents were made by hand.
d. errors were commonly made.
e. often the person to disclose the document into court was the same person who prepared the reproduction
f. deliberate "inaccuracies" were frequently made, when it would be to the person making the copy benefitted
g. legitimate answer was to necessitate the original be produced if a person sought to disclose it in court
(The Best-Evidence Rule, n. d.).
3. The Reasoning/Rationale Behind Its Application
A. also identified as the Original Document Rule
B. The underlying principle is logical
a. before, "a copy was typically made by a clerk, or a participant to the court case".
b. a greater chance of error or fraud if original was not supplied (Dicarlo, 2008).
4. Court Cases In Regards To Wiretapping
A. Olmstead v. United States 277 U.S. 4 ...
You might look back on childhood and fondly remember how exciting it was to receive mail. Well, as an adult, the correspondences you receive are typically not that thrilling.
Understanding the Legal Weapons Landlords and Tenants have in Enforcing/Termi...Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.
Adam Leitman Bailey discusses Understanding the Legal Weapons Landlords and Tenants have in Enforcing/Terminating Commercial Leases and the Secrets of How to Negotiate the Best Abatement/Deferment so both Landlord and Tenant are Happy for AmTrust on 7/15
Adam Leitman Bailey and Andrew Jorges were invited to lecture on Common Ways Deals Die and How Brokers Can Bring Them Back to Life for Town Residential.
Invited by the New York State Bar Association’s Advanced Real Estate Topics among an esteemed panel of practitioners, Adam Leitman Bailey used his experiences as a commercial leasing litigator to discuss in his presentation how transactional attorneys can improve their lease writing skills.
Lawyers Surviving The Apocalypse; Adam Leitman Bailey, Dov Treiman, and John ...Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.
Adam Leitman Bailey, Dov Treiman, and John Desiderio discuss how real estate professionals can better prepare for catastrophic events and natural disasters
The latest news and insights from the team at Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. - must-read case highlights, articles, and recent press mentions key to expanding your knowledge of real estate law. In this issue, learn about the First and Second Department split on proprietary cooperative leases, how homelessness is effected by rent stabilization, how ALBPC won over $1M for a boutique brokerage firm, and more...
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
1. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
Trial
Preparation
In-‐Service
CLE
ADAM
LEITMAN
BAILEY,
PC
February
14,
2013
Colin
E.
Kaufman
2. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
1
Trial Preparation
“Before beginning, plan carefully.” Marcus Tullius Cicero
“Preparation is the be-all of good trial work. Everything else – felicity of
expression, improvisational brilliance - is a satellite around the sun. Thorough
preparation is that sun.” Louis Nizer
“The fight is won or lost far away from witnesses - behind the lines, in the gym,
and out there on the road, long before I dance under those lights.” Muhammad Ali
“The mode by which the inevitable comes to pass is effort.” Oliver Wendell
Holmes
“If you don’t know where you’re going, you’ll end up someplace else.” Yogi
Berra
“I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have.” Thomas Jefferson
Two things win cases – facts and preparation. You can’t do anything to change the
first. You can do a lot about the second.
Factual investigation is what enables you to present your case effectively and to be
aware of the holes in your adversary’s case. No amount of courtroom brilliance, no
rhetoric, no knowledge of the intricacies of the law, is going to help you if you
don’t know all of the facts. As a trial lawyer, you are limited by time and budget in
what you can do, but in every case, you should have done as much investigation as
those two constraints admit.
Before you reach the courtroom, you should have spent as much time as you (and
your client) can afford with your client, the witnesses and the documents. You
have to know as early as possible what you are going to prove, how you are going
to prove it and what your opening and summation are going to look like in broad
strokes.
3. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
2
Judicial Investigation
DISCOVERY
1. “paper” discovery (common ones follow)
a. Demand for a Bill of Particulars
b. Demand for Discovery and Inspection
c. Demand for witness information
d. Demand for expert witness information
e. Demand for collateral sources / Demand for
insurance coverage
f. Demand for appearances
g. Notice for entry upon land
h. Deposition Notice (see below)
i. Interrogatories
i. Every discovery demand and response is
served on every party
ii. Papers discovery and responses do not need
to be filed and almost never are
2. Depositions
a. Parties
b. Non-parties
i. Deposition subpoena duces tecum
ii. Notice to adverse parties
c. Deposition is an out of court oral sworn statement
in a question and answer format
i. Depositions are taken down by a court
reporter and sometimes a videographer
ii. Normally taken at the office of one of the
lawyers
iii. Transcript is sent by the inquiring lawyer to
the deponent’s lawyer for client review and
execution; transcript is then returning fully
executed to the inquiring lawyer
3. Notice to Admit (the only one with a self-executing date)
4. Firm dates are set at a Preliminary Conference
a. Sometimes a judge, sometimes a law secretary
4. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
3
-25-
Non- Judicial Investigation
1. Visit the scene
2. Background everybody (including your client)
3. Use the internet (handout from two weeks ago)
4. Speak with every potential witness
a. Investigative interviews are not witness prep
b. Just because someone was a witness doesn’t mean
you should call him
5. Read
a. All the pleadings
b. All the disclosure
c. Facts not shown in disclosure
d. PJI
e. Cases
6. Winnow for your direct case
Evidence
You prove or defend cases with evidence
With minor exceptions, there are only four types:
1. Testimonial
2. Documentary
3. Real
4. Demonstrative
The Starting Point:
“all relevant evidence is admissible unless its admission violates some exclusionary
rule” People v. Scarola, 71 N.Y.2d 769, 525 N.E.2d 728, 530 N.Y.S.2d 83
(1988)
AND REMEMBER
Unobjected to evidence is admissible CPLR 4017, Gamman v. Silverman, 98
A.D.3d 995, 950 N.Y.S.2d 598 (2d Dept. 2012).
5. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
4
Gathering the Evidence
1. usually you only get one shot at real evidence
2. get there early
3. talk to everyone you can
4. get all your client’s documents and all your adversary’s
discoverable papers gather up everything you can
5. photograph everything you can
6. have someone mark it, bag it, tag it
7. for fungibles, you must establish chain of custody - for
everything else, you should
Witness
selection
1. You are telling a story
2. Use those you have to use
3. Don’t call witnesses just to please the client
a. If they don’t add to the case, don’t call them
4. The best way to deal with a problem witness is not to call
him
5. Considerations (aside from knowledge) for a “friendly”
witness
a. Clarity of expression
b. Smartness (not just intelligence)
c. Appearance
d. Sympathy
e. Amenability to preparation
f. Skeletons
i. Demonstrable bias
ii. Prior bad acts
6. Do not assume, just because your witnesses have
cooperated thus far, they will come in willingly. Subpoena
them (nicely). Subpoena the records you need (but not
those your adversary needs to establish a prima facie case).
Make sure your expert (a) is available, (b) is prepared and
(c) has read everything which could conceivably be thrown
up to him.
6. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
5
Trial Files
1. This is not the time to be bashful about killing trees
2. One file per witness
a. Contains everything that witness previously said
b. Contains exhibits you want her to sponsor
3. Exhibits for direct - original exhibit (clearly identified)
a. Copy for you (so you can question about contents)
b. Copy for Court
c. Copy for opposing counsel
d. 8 copies for jury notebooks (if you are doing that)
4. File for cross
a. Prior testimony, indexed and MARKED
b. Impeachment materials
i. Copy for you
ii. Copy for court
iii. Copy for opposing counsel
c. Everything else
5. Pleadings file (marked pleadings if you are Plaintiff)
6. Motions files
7. Photos, maps, diagrams (other than those specific to a
witness), each x 4
8. Correspondence (usually in chron order)
9. Trial memoranda
10.Your trial bag of tricks
a. Magnifying glass
b. Ruler
c. Colored markers
d. Magnifying glasses (specs)
e. Tabs & yellow stickies of various sizes
11.Your reference books
a. CPLR
b. Other applicable statute(s)
c. Freedman – NY Objections
d. Case-specific treatises
7. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
6
Theory
of
the
Case
and
Themes
Theory of the Case
1. Structural
a. What happened? Why? How?
2. Everything you do at trial has to support your
theory of the case
3. How do I as a juror do the right thing
4. Unstructured evidence will confuse the jury and
lead to a loss
Themes
1. Themes are the trumpet calls you want sounding in
the background of everything you do – a reason that
the jury wants emotionally to follow your theory of
the case.
2. A good theme should have an “Oh, come on – that’s
obvious” quality
3. Examples
a. Honest people pay their debts
b. A man’s word should be his bond
c. This lawyer was responsible to do what other
lawyers would do in the same situation
PREPPING THE WITNESS
Ideally, you meet the witness at least four times
First - during your factual investigation
Second - depo prep
Third - initial trial prep
Fourth - immediately before trial testimony
Deposition prep is very different from trial prep
8. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
7
1. you can’t win at deposition, you can lose (but note
contrarian theory – come on strong at deposition to settle)
2. at deposition you are being interrogated, at trial you are
telling your story
3. you will never convince the opposing lawyer
that you are right; you can convince a jury
4. 10 word rule v. tell your story
5. speaking for the record v. discussing what happened.
In almost every case, the witness has never done this before
- remember that
Familiarity with the courtroom
1. if you can, take the witness to a
courtroom - best is if you can take her to
the courtroom - if you can’t take him there,
diagram it
2. tell him how to walk up to the stand,
how to take the oath (find out if he needs to
affirm), and how to leave
don’t discuss the case within a mile of the courthouse
Familiarity with procedure
-first direct by me, then cross by the other lawyer, maybe
redirect, maybe recross - the judge may ask questions
-how will I show you the evidence?
- what do you call the judge?
- how should you dress?
9. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
8
Familiarity with events and objects
-tell me what happened; do it again
- review the documents
- what do you do if someone hands you a
document? - what do you do if the other lawyer
reads from a document?
- what do you do when the other lawyer reads
from a transcript?
-here are the areas we are going to cover
-here are the areas the other lawyers may ask you about
Preparing the substance of the examination
- tell the witness what the issues are in the case
- tell the witness why he is here
- let her tell you the story, not the other way around
- do a lot of who, what, when, where, why & how
- find out how it smelled, felt, sounded
- show the witness the evidence - have him handle it, let him
tell you about it
- drop your buzzwords into the questions (in great
moderation) - don’t script the testimony - tell the witness
that the questions won’t be the same, although the areas
will be
10. Colin
E.
Kaufman
Adam
Leitman
Bailey,
PC
February
14,
2013
In-‐Service
CLE
9
The Rules - Ten Commandments (one with subparts) plus a hint
1) TELL THE TRUTH
2) Show up when you are supposed to
3) SLS – communicate
a) look at the jury
b) remember who has to be told what happened
4) Don’t guess or speculate
5) Don’t answer a question you don’t hear or understand
6) Make times, dates and distances estimates (unless you
know)
7) When you hear an objection, wait. You can answer if it
is overruled; you don’t answer if it is sustained; ask the
judge if you’re not sure what to do
8) You will be nervous - it’s okay - breathe deep and hold on to
the chair - don’t fidget
9) Know what you said before, but your deposition transcript is not
a script
10) Deal with cross-examination
- Same obligation of courtesy and truthfulness as on
direct, but don’t volunteer and don’t explain
- don’t try to anticipate
- don’t try to outsmart the cross-examiner
- don’t get mad
- Cross-examiner gets to suggest an answer, you don’t
have to accept the suggestion
-You don’t have to answer “yes” or “no”, even if
someone tells you that you do
Hint: Go to the bathroom before you testify (while you’re there,
check how you look)