This document discusses appropriate endpoints for clinical trials in different phases. It notes that phase 1 trials focus on toxicity while phase 2 looks at efficacy. Overall response rate and progression-free survival are described as appropriate phase 2 endpoints. Overall survival and quality of life are the most appropriate phase 3 endpoints, though disease-free survival and progression-free survival are sometimes used as surrogates despite not always predicting overall survival. The document also covers issues like measurement error in tumor response and criteria for establishing surrogate endpoints.
Potential of phase II clinical trials in drug developmentBhaswat Chakraborty
This document discusses the potential of Phase II clinical trials in drug development. It notes that Phase II trials can sometimes provide sufficient evidence of efficacy and safety for drug approval, particularly for serious or life-threatening diseases with high unmet medical need. The document discusses key considerations in Phase II trial design, including the use of randomized controlled trials versus single-arm trials, appropriate selection of endpoints like overall survival or response rates, and factors involved in deciding whether to advance a drug to Phase III based on Phase II results. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of carefully designing Phase II trials to generate robust data on proof of concept and inform subsequent drug development decisions.
Jean Marc Nabholtz : Médicaments biologiques : Critères d’enregistrement et d...breastcancerupdatecongress
This document summarizes key criteria for drug registration and development of biological medicines. It discusses important considerations for clinical trial design such as asking meaningful questions, defining appropriate patient populations, sample size calculations, intent-to-treat analysis, and selecting appropriate primary and secondary endpoints. Guidelines from regulatory bodies like the EMA and FDA for evaluating cancer drugs are reviewed, including their perspectives on using progression-free survival or overall survival as primary endpoints. Examples of clinical trial results are provided to illustrate the use of different endpoints.
This document summarizes key efficacy endpoints used in oncology clinical trials, including for solid tumors and non-solid tumors like acute myeloid leukemia. For solid tumors, the best overall response (BOR) is assessed using RECIST criteria to evaluate tumor shrinkage or progression based on target and non-target lesion measurements. Key time-to-event endpoints discussed include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP). For acute myeloid leukemia, response is assessed based on blood counts and bone marrow blast percentage according to International Working Group criteria, with endpoints like complete remission rate and event-free survival. Surrogate endpoints are also discussed.
1. A significant milestone in cancer immunotherapy was the 2010 FDA approval of Provenge for prostate cancer, but most immunotherapies have failed due to low effectiveness.
2. New initiatives aim to better define biomarkers and endpoints to improve cancer immunotherapy trials by accounting for delayed responses and variable immune monitoring results.
3. A study presented preliminary results showing the Onko-Sure cancer test was more effective than CEA alone at detecting early-stage colorectal cancer.
This document summarizes information on the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) presented by Dr. Mohamed Abdulla at the Amgen Symposium in Asyut, Egypt on February 20, 2018. It discusses trends in the incidence and mortality of colon cancer in Egypt over time. It also reviews the evolution of systemic therapies for mCRC since the 1980s, highlighting improvements in overall survival associated with various chemotherapy regimens and targeted agents. Finally, it discusses factors important for determining optimal treatment sequences, including the use of predictive biomarkers, tumor location, and induction of tumor shrinkage.
1) The document discusses improving outcomes and endpoints in cancer trials by better defining what is important to measure, making endpoints more understandable for patients, and advancing endpoints to reflect changes in trial design and treatments.
2) It notes that endpoints need to show clinically relevant benefits to patients, and that improvements in trial design should be accompanied by improvements in available endpoints.
3) Stakeholders including clinicians, patients, and regulators must work together to determine the best approach for research that ensures accountability and optimizes the use of resources.
This document discusses clinical proof-of-concept (POC) trials in drug development. It defines POC as establishing whether a drug is reasonably likely to succeed based on early evidence of safety and efficacy. The document outlines goals of POC trials, decision criteria used, and strategies to improve probability of success such as better patient selection using biomarkers. It provides examples of oncology POC trials and discusses practical considerations for using patient selection approaches.
Potential of phase II clinical trials in drug developmentBhaswat Chakraborty
This document discusses the potential of Phase II clinical trials in drug development. It notes that Phase II trials can sometimes provide sufficient evidence of efficacy and safety for drug approval, particularly for serious or life-threatening diseases with high unmet medical need. The document discusses key considerations in Phase II trial design, including the use of randomized controlled trials versus single-arm trials, appropriate selection of endpoints like overall survival or response rates, and factors involved in deciding whether to advance a drug to Phase III based on Phase II results. Overall, the document emphasizes the importance of carefully designing Phase II trials to generate robust data on proof of concept and inform subsequent drug development decisions.
Jean Marc Nabholtz : Médicaments biologiques : Critères d’enregistrement et d...breastcancerupdatecongress
This document summarizes key criteria for drug registration and development of biological medicines. It discusses important considerations for clinical trial design such as asking meaningful questions, defining appropriate patient populations, sample size calculations, intent-to-treat analysis, and selecting appropriate primary and secondary endpoints. Guidelines from regulatory bodies like the EMA and FDA for evaluating cancer drugs are reviewed, including their perspectives on using progression-free survival or overall survival as primary endpoints. Examples of clinical trial results are provided to illustrate the use of different endpoints.
This document summarizes key efficacy endpoints used in oncology clinical trials, including for solid tumors and non-solid tumors like acute myeloid leukemia. For solid tumors, the best overall response (BOR) is assessed using RECIST criteria to evaluate tumor shrinkage or progression based on target and non-target lesion measurements. Key time-to-event endpoints discussed include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP). For acute myeloid leukemia, response is assessed based on blood counts and bone marrow blast percentage according to International Working Group criteria, with endpoints like complete remission rate and event-free survival. Surrogate endpoints are also discussed.
1. A significant milestone in cancer immunotherapy was the 2010 FDA approval of Provenge for prostate cancer, but most immunotherapies have failed due to low effectiveness.
2. New initiatives aim to better define biomarkers and endpoints to improve cancer immunotherapy trials by accounting for delayed responses and variable immune monitoring results.
3. A study presented preliminary results showing the Onko-Sure cancer test was more effective than CEA alone at detecting early-stage colorectal cancer.
This document summarizes information on the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) presented by Dr. Mohamed Abdulla at the Amgen Symposium in Asyut, Egypt on February 20, 2018. It discusses trends in the incidence and mortality of colon cancer in Egypt over time. It also reviews the evolution of systemic therapies for mCRC since the 1980s, highlighting improvements in overall survival associated with various chemotherapy regimens and targeted agents. Finally, it discusses factors important for determining optimal treatment sequences, including the use of predictive biomarkers, tumor location, and induction of tumor shrinkage.
1) The document discusses improving outcomes and endpoints in cancer trials by better defining what is important to measure, making endpoints more understandable for patients, and advancing endpoints to reflect changes in trial design and treatments.
2) It notes that endpoints need to show clinically relevant benefits to patients, and that improvements in trial design should be accompanied by improvements in available endpoints.
3) Stakeholders including clinicians, patients, and regulators must work together to determine the best approach for research that ensures accountability and optimizes the use of resources.
This document discusses clinical proof-of-concept (POC) trials in drug development. It defines POC as establishing whether a drug is reasonably likely to succeed based on early evidence of safety and efficacy. The document outlines goals of POC trials, decision criteria used, and strategies to improve probability of success such as better patient selection using biomarkers. It provides examples of oncology POC trials and discusses practical considerations for using patient selection approaches.
European Cancer Congress 2015 Conference InsightYujia Sun
- Phase II data from studies of Roche's PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab showed promising efficacy in NSCLC and bladder cancer, positioning it as a potential front-runner for first-line NSCLC treatment ahead of rival drugs. In bladder cancer, atezolizumab could become the first approved PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.
- Updated results from the POPLAR study directly compared atezolizumab to docetaxel in pre-treated NSCLC, showing a nearly 3 month improvement in overall survival with fewer side effects for atezolizumab. Efficacy was correlated with PD-L1 tumor expression.
- Positive data from POPLAR support Roche's planned early 2016 FDA
1) The document discusses treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), including the importance of multidisciplinary teams, sequencing of chemotherapy and targeted therapies, and continuing treatment beyond progression.
2) Key points addressed include using oxaliplatin or irinotecan as the chemotherapy backbone, adding targeted therapies like bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibodies based on molecular markers, and exploring more intensive strategies like FOLFOXIRI for certain patients.
3) Maintaining quality of life across all treatment lines is emphasized as the overarching goal.
Breast cancer oncotype-dx.. by dr.Kamel Farag, MDKamelFarag4
This document discusses factors oncologists consider when determining if a patient with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer can skip chemotherapy.
It begins by explaining the three main breast cancer subtypes and that chemotherapy is usually only necessary for triple-negative and HER2-positive cancers. For hormone receptor-positive cancers, chemotherapy may have a lesser role since patients benefit greatly from anti-estrogen medications.
It then discusses tools oncologists use to assess risk, such as genomic tests like Oncotype DX that provide recurrence scores, and clinicopathologic factors like tumor grade and size. Large clinical trials like TAILORx and RxPONDER helped establish cut-offs for recurrence scores below which chemotherapy provided little additional benefit
Edward B. Garon, MD, MS, Jamie E. Chaft, MD, and Matthew D. Hellmann, MD, prepared useful Practice Aids pertaining to lung cancer management for this CME/MOC/CE activity titled "Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Cancer Continuum: State of the Science and Implications for Practice." For the full presentation, monograph, complete CME/MOC/CE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at http://bit.ly/2ATq0qp. CME/MOC/CE credit will be available until November 21, 2019.
1) A phase 3 trial compared nivolumab to everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients who had received 1-2 prior anti-angiogenic therapies. Nivolumab demonstrated significantly longer overall survival compared to everolimus, with median overall survival of 25 months versus 19.6 months.
2) Nivolumab had a higher objective response rate compared to everolimus (25% vs 5%) and longer median duration of response.
3) The overall survival benefit of nivolumab was consistent across patient subgroups and was independent of PD-L1 expression levels.
This document summarizes a study that developed a CT-based radiomics score to noninvasively evaluate the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in 2272 gastric cancer patients. The radiomics score achieved good performance in predicting the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) status in the TIME. Notably, the radiomics score was comparable to the immunohistochemistry-derived NLR status in predicting patient survival outcomes. Furthermore, the study found that objective response rates to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy were significantly higher in patients with a low radiomics score compared to those with a high radiomics score. The radiomics imaging biomarker provides a noninvasive method for evaluating the TIME and its correlation with prognosis and response to
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...Cytel USA
1. The document discusses moving beyond conventional practices in translational statistics to obtain more robust and clinically meaningful results from clinical studies.
2. Several methodology issues are discussed, including how to define primary endpoints when there are multiple outcomes, how to handle dropouts and competing risks, and how to quantify treatment contrasts in a model-free way.
3. Alternative approaches are proposed for various types of studies, such as using restricted mean survival times instead of hazard ratios for survival analyses and performing meta-analyses for evaluating safety issues using large amounts of data.
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinicMohamed Abdulla
1) Metastatic colorectal cancer treatment involves stratifying patients and using predictive markers to determine the optimal treatment sequence of chemotherapy and targeted therapies like anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents.
2) Right-sided and left-sided colon cancers have different molecular profiles and responses to treatment, with right-sided cancers having a worse prognosis.
3) Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colon cancers, which are more common on the right side, may respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD-1 therapy due to high tumor mutational burden.
Presented at PhUSE 2013
The evaluation of efficacy in oncology studies, in particular for solid tumors, is pretty standard and well defined by several regulatory guidance (e.g. EMA and FDA), including some specific cancer type guidance (e.g. NSCLC from FDA).
Although some references will be also given for non-solid tumors, the paper will mainly focus on solid tumors efficacy
endpoints.
Overall Survival, Best Overall Response as per RECIST criteria, Progression Free Survival (PFS), Time to Progression (TTP), Best Overall Response Rate are some of the key efficacy indicators that will be discussed.
This document discusses the benefits and drawbacks of using positron emission tomography (PET) scans to monitor patients who have achieved complete remission from Diffused Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) after primary treatment. While PET scans can detect relapses early and lead to better outcomes, they also expose patients to radiation and may not be necessary, as the majority of relapses are detected without scans. The document concludes that despite costs and radiation exposure, regular PET scans for two years are important to diagnose the 30% of relapses detected by scans alone and improve prognosis for these patients.
Secondary Malignancy after Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Radical Prostatectom...asclepiuspdfs
Background: This study aims to determine whether the treatment of locally confined prostate cancer (PCa) with external radiotherapy (EBRT) increases the risk to develop secondary malignancies (SM) compared to radical prostatectomy (RPE). Materials and Methods: Data from patients who were treated curatively with RPE or EBRT from 2010 to 2018 and who did not have distant metastases, previous malignancy, or previous treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy at the time of diagnosis were reviewed to determine the incidence of SM over a median follow-up period of 47 months (range 12–96 months). Regression models were used to correlate the clinicopathological factors with the incidence of SM.
Clinical trials follow a phased process to evaluate new treatments. Phase I trials test safety in small groups. Phase II trials assess efficacy in larger groups. Phase III trials compare new treatments head-to-head with standard treatments in large randomized controlled trials. Higher levels of evidence come from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of multiple randomized controlled trials, while lower levels of evidence derive from expert opinions and single descriptive studies.
This document summarizes an introduction to clinical trials presented by Jan B. Vermorken. It outlines the process of moving new cancer therapies from the laboratory to clinical trials, including preclinical testing requirements, phases of clinical trials (I-III), response criteria, and considerations for trials of non-cytotoxic agents. It also discusses the roles and functions of ethics committees in overseeing clinical trials to protect participants.
Estudio Paramount cáncer de pulmón 2014Martín Lázaro
1) The PARAMOUNT study evaluated pemetrexed maintenance therapy after induction with pemetrexed/cisplatin doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
2) The study met its primary endpoint, finding that pemetrexed maintenance significantly reduced the risk of disease progression compared to placebo (HR=0.62, p<0.0001).
3) Updated results showed pemetrexed maintenance also significantly improved overall survival compared to placebo, with median OS of 13.9 months vs 11 months (HR=0.78, p=0.0199).
This brief paper will help you to understand survival analysis. This type of analysis is important when the time between exposure and event is of clinical interest. The misconception that mortality and survival are interchangeable comes from the lay use of the terms. Learn more and let me know if you have any questions.
The document discusses triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is defined by the absence of clinically meaningful expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It notes some caveats regarding these definitions. TNBC has an aggressive natural history and poor prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes. While locoregional treatment strategies do not differ for TNBC, systemic chemotherapy remains the main adjuvant and metastatic treatment due to the lack of targeted therapies for this subtype.
Surrogate Endpoints: Are drug review processes flexible enough to expedite pa...CanCertainty
This document discusses the use of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials as an alternative to overall survival. It provides background on what constitutes a valid surrogate endpoint and examples of endpoints that are not good surrogates. The document notes that validation of surrogate endpoints is often lacking, especially for early-stage cancers. An analysis of clinical trials found that the majority of trials for early-stage solid tumors use surrogate endpoints rather than traditional endpoints like overall survival. This increasing reliance on surrogate endpoints may impact regulatory reviews and reimbursement decisions in the future.
European Cancer Congress 2015 Conference InsightYujia Sun
- Phase II data from studies of Roche's PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab showed promising efficacy in NSCLC and bladder cancer, positioning it as a potential front-runner for first-line NSCLC treatment ahead of rival drugs. In bladder cancer, atezolizumab could become the first approved PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.
- Updated results from the POPLAR study directly compared atezolizumab to docetaxel in pre-treated NSCLC, showing a nearly 3 month improvement in overall survival with fewer side effects for atezolizumab. Efficacy was correlated with PD-L1 tumor expression.
- Positive data from POPLAR support Roche's planned early 2016 FDA
1) The document discusses treatment strategies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), including the importance of multidisciplinary teams, sequencing of chemotherapy and targeted therapies, and continuing treatment beyond progression.
2) Key points addressed include using oxaliplatin or irinotecan as the chemotherapy backbone, adding targeted therapies like bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibodies based on molecular markers, and exploring more intensive strategies like FOLFOXIRI for certain patients.
3) Maintaining quality of life across all treatment lines is emphasized as the overarching goal.
Breast cancer oncotype-dx.. by dr.Kamel Farag, MDKamelFarag4
This document discusses factors oncologists consider when determining if a patient with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer can skip chemotherapy.
It begins by explaining the three main breast cancer subtypes and that chemotherapy is usually only necessary for triple-negative and HER2-positive cancers. For hormone receptor-positive cancers, chemotherapy may have a lesser role since patients benefit greatly from anti-estrogen medications.
It then discusses tools oncologists use to assess risk, such as genomic tests like Oncotype DX that provide recurrence scores, and clinicopathologic factors like tumor grade and size. Large clinical trials like TAILORx and RxPONDER helped establish cut-offs for recurrence scores below which chemotherapy provided little additional benefit
Edward B. Garon, MD, MS, Jamie E. Chaft, MD, and Matthew D. Hellmann, MD, prepared useful Practice Aids pertaining to lung cancer management for this CME/MOC/CE activity titled "Improving Patient Outcomes With Cancer Immunotherapies Throughout the Lung Cancer Continuum: State of the Science and Implications for Practice." For the full presentation, monograph, complete CME/MOC/CE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at http://bit.ly/2ATq0qp. CME/MOC/CE credit will be available until November 21, 2019.
1) A phase 3 trial compared nivolumab to everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients who had received 1-2 prior anti-angiogenic therapies. Nivolumab demonstrated significantly longer overall survival compared to everolimus, with median overall survival of 25 months versus 19.6 months.
2) Nivolumab had a higher objective response rate compared to everolimus (25% vs 5%) and longer median duration of response.
3) The overall survival benefit of nivolumab was consistent across patient subgroups and was independent of PD-L1 expression levels.
This document summarizes a study that developed a CT-based radiomics score to noninvasively evaluate the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in 2272 gastric cancer patients. The radiomics score achieved good performance in predicting the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) status in the TIME. Notably, the radiomics score was comparable to the immunohistochemistry-derived NLR status in predicting patient survival outcomes. Furthermore, the study found that objective response rates to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy were significantly higher in patients with a low radiomics score compared to those with a high radiomics score. The radiomics imaging biomarker provides a noninvasive method for evaluating the TIME and its correlation with prognosis and response to
2014-10-22 EUGM | WEI | Moving Beyond the Comfort Zone in Practicing Translat...Cytel USA
1. The document discusses moving beyond conventional practices in translational statistics to obtain more robust and clinically meaningful results from clinical studies.
2. Several methodology issues are discussed, including how to define primary endpoints when there are multiple outcomes, how to handle dropouts and competing risks, and how to quantify treatment contrasts in a model-free way.
3. Alternative approaches are proposed for various types of studies, such as using restricted mean survival times instead of hazard ratios for survival analyses and performing meta-analyses for evaluating safety issues using large amounts of data.
Kiow 11 2017 metastatic colon cancer from bench to clinicMohamed Abdulla
1) Metastatic colorectal cancer treatment involves stratifying patients and using predictive markers to determine the optimal treatment sequence of chemotherapy and targeted therapies like anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR agents.
2) Right-sided and left-sided colon cancers have different molecular profiles and responses to treatment, with right-sided cancers having a worse prognosis.
3) Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colon cancers, which are more common on the right side, may respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitors like anti-PD-1 therapy due to high tumor mutational burden.
Presented at PhUSE 2013
The evaluation of efficacy in oncology studies, in particular for solid tumors, is pretty standard and well defined by several regulatory guidance (e.g. EMA and FDA), including some specific cancer type guidance (e.g. NSCLC from FDA).
Although some references will be also given for non-solid tumors, the paper will mainly focus on solid tumors efficacy
endpoints.
Overall Survival, Best Overall Response as per RECIST criteria, Progression Free Survival (PFS), Time to Progression (TTP), Best Overall Response Rate are some of the key efficacy indicators that will be discussed.
This document discusses the benefits and drawbacks of using positron emission tomography (PET) scans to monitor patients who have achieved complete remission from Diffused Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) after primary treatment. While PET scans can detect relapses early and lead to better outcomes, they also expose patients to radiation and may not be necessary, as the majority of relapses are detected without scans. The document concludes that despite costs and radiation exposure, regular PET scans for two years are important to diagnose the 30% of relapses detected by scans alone and improve prognosis for these patients.
Secondary Malignancy after Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Radical Prostatectom...asclepiuspdfs
Background: This study aims to determine whether the treatment of locally confined prostate cancer (PCa) with external radiotherapy (EBRT) increases the risk to develop secondary malignancies (SM) compared to radical prostatectomy (RPE). Materials and Methods: Data from patients who were treated curatively with RPE or EBRT from 2010 to 2018 and who did not have distant metastases, previous malignancy, or previous treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy at the time of diagnosis were reviewed to determine the incidence of SM over a median follow-up period of 47 months (range 12–96 months). Regression models were used to correlate the clinicopathological factors with the incidence of SM.
Clinical trials follow a phased process to evaluate new treatments. Phase I trials test safety in small groups. Phase II trials assess efficacy in larger groups. Phase III trials compare new treatments head-to-head with standard treatments in large randomized controlled trials. Higher levels of evidence come from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of multiple randomized controlled trials, while lower levels of evidence derive from expert opinions and single descriptive studies.
This document summarizes an introduction to clinical trials presented by Jan B. Vermorken. It outlines the process of moving new cancer therapies from the laboratory to clinical trials, including preclinical testing requirements, phases of clinical trials (I-III), response criteria, and considerations for trials of non-cytotoxic agents. It also discusses the roles and functions of ethics committees in overseeing clinical trials to protect participants.
Estudio Paramount cáncer de pulmón 2014Martín Lázaro
1) The PARAMOUNT study evaluated pemetrexed maintenance therapy after induction with pemetrexed/cisplatin doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
2) The study met its primary endpoint, finding that pemetrexed maintenance significantly reduced the risk of disease progression compared to placebo (HR=0.62, p<0.0001).
3) Updated results showed pemetrexed maintenance also significantly improved overall survival compared to placebo, with median OS of 13.9 months vs 11 months (HR=0.78, p=0.0199).
This brief paper will help you to understand survival analysis. This type of analysis is important when the time between exposure and event is of clinical interest. The misconception that mortality and survival are interchangeable comes from the lay use of the terms. Learn more and let me know if you have any questions.
The document discusses triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is defined by the absence of clinically meaningful expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It notes some caveats regarding these definitions. TNBC has an aggressive natural history and poor prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes. While locoregional treatment strategies do not differ for TNBC, systemic chemotherapy remains the main adjuvant and metastatic treatment due to the lack of targeted therapies for this subtype.
Surrogate Endpoints: Are drug review processes flexible enough to expedite pa...CanCertainty
This document discusses the use of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials as an alternative to overall survival. It provides background on what constitutes a valid surrogate endpoint and examples of endpoints that are not good surrogates. The document notes that validation of surrogate endpoints is often lacking, especially for early-stage cancers. An analysis of clinical trials found that the majority of trials for early-stage solid tumors use surrogate endpoints rather than traditional endpoints like overall survival. This increasing reliance on surrogate endpoints may impact regulatory reviews and reimbursement decisions in the future.
Similar to Tips-Tricks-Clinical-Trial-Endpoints.pdf (20)
Local Advanced Lung Cancer: Artificial Intelligence, Synergetics, Complex Sys...Oleg Kshivets
Overall life span (LS) was 1671.7±1721.6 days and cumulative 5YS reached 62.4%, 10 years – 50.4%, 20 years – 44.6%. 94 LCP lived more than 5 years without cancer (LS=2958.6±1723.6 days), 22 – more than 10 years (LS=5571±1841.8 days). 67 LCP died because of LC (LS=471.9±344 days). AT significantly improved 5YS (68% vs. 53.7%) (P=0.028 by log-rank test). Cox modeling displayed that 5YS of LCP significantly depended on: N0-N12, T3-4, blood cell circuit, cell ratio factors (ratio between cancer cells-CC and blood cells subpopulations), LC cell dynamics, recalcification time, heparin tolerance, prothrombin index, protein, AT, procedure type (P=0.000-0.031). Neural networks, genetic algorithm selection and bootstrap simulation revealed relationships between 5YS and N0-12 (rank=1), thrombocytes/CC (rank=2), segmented neutrophils/CC (3), eosinophils/CC (4), erythrocytes/CC (5), healthy cells/CC (6), lymphocytes/CC (7), stick neutrophils/CC (8), leucocytes/CC (9), monocytes/CC (10). Correct prediction of 5YS was 100% by neural networks computing (error=0.000; area under ROC curve=1.0).
Histololgy of Female Reproductive System.pptxAyeshaZaid1
Dive into an in-depth exploration of the histological structure of female reproductive system with this comprehensive lecture. Presented by Dr. Ayesha Irfan, Assistant Professor of Anatomy, this presentation covers the Gross anatomy and functional histology of the female reproductive organs. Ideal for students, educators, and anyone interested in medical science, this lecture provides clear explanations, detailed diagrams, and valuable insights into female reproductive system. Enhance your knowledge and understanding of this essential aspect of human biology.
Adhd Medication Shortage Uk - trinexpharmacy.comreignlana06
The UK is currently facing a Adhd Medication Shortage Uk, which has left many patients and their families grappling with uncertainty and frustration. ADHD, or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, is a chronic condition that requires consistent medication to manage effectively. This shortage has highlighted the critical role these medications play in the daily lives of those affected by ADHD. Contact : +1 (747) 209 – 3649 E-mail : sales@trinexpharmacy.com
Here is the updated list of Top Best Ayurvedic medicine for Gas and Indigestion and those are Gas-O-Go Syp for Dyspepsia | Lavizyme Syrup for Acidity | Yumzyme Hepatoprotective Capsules etc
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune DiseaseHealth Advances
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
Basavarajeeyam is a Sreshta Sangraha grantha (Compiled book ), written by Neelkanta kotturu Basavaraja Virachita. It contains 25 Prakaranas, First 24 Chapters related to Rogas& 25th to Rasadravyas.
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/kqbnxVAZs-0
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/SINlygW1Mpc
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
REGULATION FOR COMBINATION PRODUCTS AND MEDICAL DEVICES.pptx
Tips-Tricks-Clinical-Trial-Endpoints.pdf
1. CLINICAL TRIAL
ENDPOINTS
Prepared by Ian Tannock, Steinar
Aamdal, Dirk Arnold, Urania Dafni,
Ulrich Keilholz, Morten Mau-
Sørensen, Piotr Rutkowski, Stefan
Sleijfer
2. DISCLOSURES
Ian Tannock has reported no conflict of interest relevant to this presentation
Steinar Aamdal has reported no conflict of interest
Dirk Arnold has reported to have received honoraria for educational activities/Advisory role from Roche, Merck-Serono,
Bayer, Servier, BTG
Urania Dafni has reported no conflict of interest
Ulrich Keilholz has reported to be a member of the Speakers Bureau of BMS, Astra Zeneca, MSD, Merck, GSK,
Novartis, Roche, Amgen, Pfizer and has served as consultant for all these companies
Morten Mau-Sørensen has reported no conflict of interest
Piotr Rutkowski has reported no conflict of interest related to this ppt. However he has received honoraria from
Novartis, Roche, GSK, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Bayer and Amgen and he has served as a member of Advisory Board for
Novartis, Roche, Magen, Bayer, MSD and BMS
Stefan Sleijfer has reported no conflict of interest
3. ENDPOINTS NEED TO MATCH
THE PURPOSE OF THE TRIAL
Phase 1: Evaluate toxicity
Study drug disposition (pharmacokinetics, PK)
Proof of concept that drug inhibits its target (pharmacodynamics, PD)
Determine dose and schedule for Phase 2
Phase 2: Estimate anti-tumour efficacy
Further define toxicity
Further PD studies
Phase 3: Compare outcomes reflecting patient benefit with usual standard of
care
4. ENDPOINTS APPROPRIATE FOR
OTHER TYPES OF TRIAL
Phase 0: Trials in which a (usually) low dose of a drug is given. Appropriate endpoints are
measures of drug disposition and target inhibition
Phase 4: Post-marketing studies. Appropriate endpoints are those of efficacy and toxicity
under real-life conditions
Trials of local therapy: In addition to endpoints used in trials of systemic therapy, other
appropriate endpoints may include:
Local relapse-free survival
Functional effects
Completeness of resection
5. ENDPOINTS IN PHASE I AND
PHASE II TRIALS
While the primary goal of phase I trials is to evaluate toxicity and tolerance (and PK
and PD) agents that show no signs of activity rarely succeed in later trials.
The primary goal in phase II is to determine if there is sufficient evidence of anti-
tumour activity to undertake further studies in phase III (very expensive in terms of
human and €€€ resources).
Appropriate endpoints for phase II include measures of anti-tumour activity such as
Overall Response Rate (ORR) or reduction of a tumour marker (e.g. PSA response
rate).
Progression-free survival (PFS) or percent without progression at a given time are
also appropriate endpoints in phase II trials, especially if they are randomised.
Identification of biomarkers is important in early phase trials. New endpoints such as
reduction in circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are under investigation
6. TUMOUR RESPONSE AS AN
ENDPOINT
Evaluation of Tumour response has been standardised using (modified) “Response
Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours” (RECIST).
Stable Disease (SD) is reported frequently as an endpoint with the implication that it
reflects an anti-tumour effect of a drug rather than a criterion to continue treatment.
While long-term SD (e.g. > 6 months) might imply anti-tumour effects, a tumour
growing steadily with a volume doubling time of ≥2 months (typical for human
tumours) will satisfy SD ≥1 month.
Endpoints used in Phase II trials do not measure benefit to patients. Tumour
shrinkage is rarely correlated with endpoints of patient benefit such as Overall
Survival (OS) or Quality of Life (QoL)
“Clinical benefit rate” (CR+PR+SD) should not be used. It has no implication of
“clinical benefit”.
Eisenhauer EA,et al. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228-47
Le Tourneau C, et al. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:260-3
Ohorodnyk P, et al. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:2249-52
7. TUMOUR RESPONSE:
MEASUREMENT ERROR AND
WATERFALL PLOTS
Despite standardisation by RECIST, evaluation of ORR is subject to measurement
error
Waterfall plots are now in common use to demonstrate maximal changes in tumour
size among patients in phase II trials
Example:
Waterfall plots are also subject to errors of tumour measurement
Ratain MJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2505-12
Shao T, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106 (12), by permission of Oxford
University Press
Change
in
tumour
area
Progression
Partial Response
8. ENDPOINTS IN PHASE III TRIALS
The goal of Phase 3 trials is to compare outcomes reflecting patient
benefit with the usual standard of care.
There are essentially only 2 ways in which patients may benefit from
treatment:
They either live longer or they live better.
Thus the most appropriate endpoints of phase III trials are:
Overall Survival (OS)
Quality of Life (QoL)
Any other endpoint is a surrogate endpoint, and should be shown to
predict OS or QoL.
9. SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN
PHASE III TRIALS
While OS is a preferred endpoint and not subject to bias, the survival time for patients
with many types of cancer is (fortunately) quite long. This is especially true for trials of
adjuvant therapy.
Disease-Free Survival (DFS), also known as Relapse-Free Survival (RFS), is often used
as a primary endpoint in phase III trials of adjuvant therapy.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is used commonly as a primary endpoint in phase III
trials evaluating treatment of metastatic cancer.
Since the size of a trial is determined by the number of “events”, and recurrence or
progression of cancer usually occurs before death, trials with DFS or PFS as the
primary endpoint can be evaluated earlier, and require a smaller sample.
Some investigators also prefer these endpoints because they are not influenced by
subsequent therapies.
10. CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING
“SURROGACY”
Surrogacy of an endpoint such as PFS for OS requires that a patient with longer PFS
will have longer OS. It is not sufficient that PFS be correlated with OS.
A valid surrogate for OS should satisfy the Prentice criteria:
The treatment has an effect on survival time.
The treatment has an effect on the surrogate.
The surrogate is associated with survival time.
The treatment effect on survival is captured by the surrogate.
It is rare that endpoints such as DFS or PFS have been shown to be true surrogates
for OS
Prentice RL, Stat Med 1989;8 431–440
Heller G, Ann Oncol 2015;26 (10):2012-16
12. ADVANTAGES AND
DISADVANTAGES OF DFS OR PFS
AS ENDPOINTS IN PHASE III TRIALS
Advantages
“Events” occur earlier, so trials can be reported earlier, potentially accelerating availability of active
new treatments
Greater number of “events” allows smaller trials
Not subject to effects of subsequent treatment
Disadvantages
Not measures of patient benefit
Delayed tumour progression, but with toxicity causing detriment in QoL, and no improvement
in OS, does not convey clinical benefit
Subject to bias
Uncertainty of time of relapse or progression
Censoring bias – imbalanced withdrawal of patients who are censored prior to relapse or
progression
Broglio KR and Berry DA, J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 ;101:1642-9
Korn RL and Crowley JJ, Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:2607-12
Templeton AJ, et al. Eur J Cancer 2015;51:721-4
13. HAZARD RATIOS
For time to event endpoints (OS, DFS and PFS) it is common to report the difference
between experimental and control curves as a Hazard Ratio (HR).
Use of HR implies “proportional hazards”:
i.e. the ratio between events occurring in any given time interval with experimental compared to
control treatment is constant
HR is not meaningful where survival curves are not of similar shape
If HR<1 and the 95% confidence interval excludes 1, there is a statistically significant effect
of the experimental treatment as compared to control.
Statistical significance is not the same as clinical significance.
It is common to analyse actuarial survival curves when many patients have not had an
“event” (relapse, progression or death). The tails of the curves are poorly defined and HR
will change with time – usually becoming closer to 1.0