SlideShare a Scribd company logo
TIME BARRED MORTGAGES
IN BANKRUPTCY 2.0
Joseph Towne, Esq.
Lender Legal Services, LLC
Why is this issue important?
Why is this issue important?
- Both State and Federal Law are in a deep state of
disagreement and flux
- Filling a Proof of Claim on a consumer debt Barred
by the Statute of Limitations or Repose may be a
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violation.
Why is this issue important?
- Debtors can use negative notice and a motion to determine
secured status under 11 U.S.C. § 506 as a core proceeding
to discharge mortgages in bankruptcy court after
confirmation. See In re Brown, 2014 WL 983532 (Bankr. M.D.
Fla.) Quiet Title as an adversary proceeding may also
available.
- Attorneys who file Proofs of claim on a time barred debts may
be subject to penalties under Bankruptcy Procedure Rule
9011
- Candor to the court under Fla. R. Prof Conduct 4-3.3(a)(1)
FDCPA Liability-Recent Cases
- Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 758 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir.
2014).
- Facts: Creditor regularly purchases stale debts and files
proofs of claim in bankruptcy court. Creditor filed a proof of
claim on a debt barred under Alabama law and debtor filed
an adversary proceeding alleging FDCPA violation. Creditor
admitted that the debt at issue in this case would be
unenforceable in state court and the creditor.
FDCPA Liability
- Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 758 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir.
2014).
- Held: since the debt was unenforceable under state law, filing
a proof of claim was an FDCPA violation.
- The reasonable consumer standard applies to proofs of
claims filed by attorneys in the bankruptcy context
FDCPA Liability
- However the second circuit, the Northern District of Illinois,
Southern District of Illinois, and the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania hold that a proof of claim on a time barred debt
is not an FDCPA violation
FDCPA Liability- LVNV Strikes Back
- Donaldson v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 1:14-cv-01979-LJM-TAB;
2015 WL 1539607 (S.D. Ind. 2015 April 7, 2015).
- Facts: Debtor files Ch.13. LVNV files proofs of claims on
credit cards that were barred under Indiana law because
more than 6 years passed from the last payment made.
Debtor files complaint for violation of the FDCPA.
FDCPA Liability- LVNV Strikes Back
- Donaldson v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 2015 WL 1539607 (S.D.
Ind. 2015 April 7, 2015).
Held: Not false or deceptive when debtor lists debt on his
schedules.
Under Indiana law debt was still owed even though it was
barred.
Applied the competent lawyer standard, not least
sophisticated consumer standard
FDCPA Liability
Torres v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, 2015 WL 1529297 (E.D. Pa.
Apr. 7, 2015)
Facts: Debtor files a Chapter 13 in 2013. Creditor files a proof
of claim for small debt with a last payment and transaction of
June 10, 2002 outside of Pennsylvania’s four year statute of
limitations. Debtor files a complaint for violation of FDCPA.
FDCPA Liability
Torres v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, 2015 WL 1529297 (E.D. Pa.
Apr. 7, 2015)
Held: Not possible to sue under the FDCPA for any violation in
a proof of claim filed under the Bankruptcy Code.
The remedies under the Code (9011) were sufficient
“the Court will not insert judicially created remedies into
Congress’s carefully calibrated bankruptcy scheme, thus
tilting the balance of rights and obligations between debtors
and creditors.”
FDCPA Liability
Bad News:
We don’t live in those jurisdictions
So how do we avoid liability until SCOTUS
resolves the conflict?
First, find out if your debt is barred
State Law:
Its not just the place you find the homestead
exemption anymore
Choice of law for determining the
limitations statute for mortgages is the
same under both Federal and Florida –
local laws of situs subject to preemption
State Law:
Its not just the place you find the homestead
exemption anymore
- Judgment – collateral estoppel law of the state is
applied to determine judgment’s preclusive effect
- However, the bankruptcy court retains exclusive
jurisdiction to determine dischargeability. St.
Laurent v. Ambrose, 991 F.2d 672, 675 (11th Cir.
1993).
WHAT IS A MORTGAGE?
- Any written instrument
securing money or advances
(i.e. a Note).
- Installment Notes, Balloon
Notes, Revolving Credit
Agreements, Equitable
Mortgages
COVENANTS
- Payments
- Due on Sale Clause
- Occupancy
- Acceleration based on a government
taking
- Taxes
- Insurance
- Miscellaneous – e.g. mortgagor provide
service Dogs
Which Statute of Limitations applies to
Mortgages?
Trick Question: 2 statutes – statute of limitations
and statute of repose
Statute of Limitations
- Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(C) – within 5
years of accrual
- A procedural Statute that prevents the
enforcement of the cause of action
that has accrued. Houck Corp.
Statute of Limitations
- Prevents the enforcement of the
remedy rather than the termination of
the substantive rights of the parties.
Allie v. Ionata
Five years from What?
- Last Element occurs. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c)
- 4 elements of a foreclosure action
- (1) an agreement (2) a default (3)
acceleration of debt to maturity (4)
damages. Ernest v. Carter, 368 So.2d
428, 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
Five years from What?
- Majority Opinion - Central Home Trust Co. v.
Lippincott, 392 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA
1980) – Acceleration starts the clock
- when some affirmative action is taken to
accelerate the debt such as “… making an oral
demand, and alleging acceleration in a pleading
filed in a suit on the debt.”
Five years from What?
- What if there is no acceleration clause?
- You cannot foreclose the mortgage. Reed
v. Lincoln 731 So.2d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA
1999)
BUT: you can sue for future damages
under the note. National Educ. Centers,
Inc. v. Kirkland, 635 So.2d 33 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1993).
Optional vs. Absolute Acceleration Clauses
- Optional – says acceleration does not occur
until plaintiff exercises the option. i.e.
Lippencott
- Absolute – Says that upon default future
payments are immediately accelerated.
Baader v. Walker, 153 So.2d 51 (Fla. 2d
DCA 1963).
Optional vs. Absolute Acceleration Clauses
- Can a presuit letter be the “acceleration”?
Held: not an acceleration because conduct
was to occur in the future.
Snow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 156 So.3d 538
(Fla. 3d DCA 2015) “If you do not pay the full
amount of the default, we shall accelerate the
entire sum of both principal and interest due and
payable....”. Mortgage contained an optional
acceleration clause.
Minority/Dicta Position – Date of Default
- Mostly Dicta and inaccurate restatement
of Florida Law
- CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC v.
Unknown Heirs of Gendron, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D244
(Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Dorta v. Wilmington Trust Nat.
Ass’n, No. 5:13-cv-185-Oc-10PRL, 2014 WL
1152917 (M.D. Fla. March 24, 2014); Kaan v. Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., 2013 WL 5944074 (S.D.Fla. Nov.
5, 2013)
Statute of Repose
- Fla. Stat. § 95.281
- a substantive statute which not only bars
enforcement of an accrued cause of action but
may also prevent the accrual of a cause of
action where the final element necessary for its
creation occurs beyond the time period
established by the statute. Houck Corp. v. New
River, Ltd, 900 So.2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Statute of Repose
- Either 5 years after the date of maturity if
the maturity date is ascertainable from
the record . . . OR
- If the maturity date is not ascertainable -
20 years after the date of the [execution of
the] mortgage unless the note has a
definite maturity date, etc.
Ascertainable from the record
- Must be clearly visible on the face of the
recorded mortgage. CCM Pathfinder Palm
Harbor Management, LLC v. Unknown Heirs of
Gendron, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D244 (Fla. 2d DCA
2015).
Federal Preemption
Federal Preemption
- FDIC Assignee - enjoys a six year limitations period that
trumps both the Statute of limitations and the statute of
repose. 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(14)(A). WRH Mortg. Inc. v.
Butler, 684 So.2d 325 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
- Runs from the later of the accrual of the cause of
Action or the date the FDIC takes over as receiver
- SBA Administration Assignee – infinite time to
foreclose because there is no limitations period stated
in the Small Business Administration Act. See
Magnolia Federal Bank for Savings v. The United
States of America, (U.S.D.C. So. Dist. Miss. 1993).
See generally, United States v. Alvarado, 5 F.3d 1425
(11th Cir. Fla. 1993).
- Assignee of the USA acquires right to unlimited time
to foreclose. LPP Mtg Ltd. v. Tucker, 48 So.3d 115
(Fla. 3rd DCA 2010).
Federal Preemption
Federal Preemption
United States of America as Mortgagee – Same as
SBA Unlimited time to foreclose
- 28 U.S.C. § 2415(c) states “nothing herein shall be
deemed to limit the time for bringing an action to
establish the title to, or right of possession of real or
personal property”.
Tolling
Tolling
Death or incapacitation of the Mortgagee before the expiration
of the cause of action (Applies to both limitations and repose)
(if death) the action may be commenced within 12 months
from the date of the mortgagee’s death. Fla. Stat. §
733.104
(if incapacitation) within one year of appointment by the
guardian. Fla. Stat. § 744.394
Tolling
Future Advance Clause - If the mortgage contains a
future advance clause under Fla. Stat. § 697.04, then
future advances made under the mortgage can
extend the maturity date from five years to 20 years.
See Razak v. Marina Club of Tampa Homeowners
Assn., Inc., 968 So.2d 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).
Typically seen in construction loans
Tolling
- Bankruptcy 11 U.S.C.A. § 108 applies to both
repose and limitations
- If the cause of action was not barred before the
filing then you have the later of
- The end of the original statute of limitations
OR
- 30 days after the notice of termination or
expiration of the automatic stay.
Tolling
Fla. Stat. § 95.051 (outline at p.6) limitations only
- Absence of defendant from state
- Use by Defendant of a false name
- Concealment by Defendant in state
- Payment of any part of the principle or interest of
any obligation or liability founded on instrument
- Incapacity or minority of plaintiff to sue and no
guardian exists
Tolling
- Equitable tolling – Prudent Plaintiff runs astray
Tolling
- Equitable tolling – Prudent Plaintiff runs astray
- Does not require active deception on the part of
the defendant but focuses on the plaintiff with a
reasonably prudent regard for his rights
- Examples:
- Mislead or lulled into inaction
- In some extraordinary way been prevented from
asserting rights
- Timely asserted rights in wrong forum
Tolling
Equitable Estoppel a.k.a. Wrongdoing by Defendant
Tolling
Equitable Estoppel a.k.a. Wrongdoing by Defendant
- Plaintiff must plead that Plaintiff knew it had a cause of
action but defendants wrong doing prevented plaintiff
from bringing a timely action
- Plaintiff and defendant know about the facts giving rise to
the suit but the wrongdoer prevails upon the other to
forego enforcing his right until the statutory time has
elapsed
Tolling
- Oral Promise to pay may also toll the statute of
limitations
- Oral promise to pay or make partial payment if
made prior to the statute of limitations tolls the
statute of limitations. Jacksonville Am. Pub. Co. v.
Jacksonville Paper Co., 197 So. 672, 676 (Fla.
1940)
Tolling
- Counterclaims for recoupment. See p.7 of outline
What happens when the statute of limitations runs?
What happens when the statute of limitations runs?
- Singleton v. Greymar Associates, 882 So.2d
1004, 1008 (Fla. 2004)
- Each new default is a breach which may be
separately accelerated (in the context of res
judicata)
What happens when the statute of limitations runs?
- U.S. Bank v. Bartram, 140 So.3d 1007 (5th
DCA 2014).
- Each new default represents a new cause of
action which may be an independent basis to
accelerate the loan again
- Currently pending in supreme court – oral
argument set for October 6, 2015.
What happens when the statute of limitations runs?
Third DCA - Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Amer. V.
Beauvais, 2014 WL 7156961 (Fla. 3d DCA
2014). Bartram only applies to a subsequent
action that follows a dismissal with prejudice.
Dismissals without prejudice including voluntary
dismissals do not reset statute of limitations.
Deceleration notice may reset the action for
SOL purposes, but unforeclosable lien remains
in force until the expiration of the repose.
What happens when the statute of limitations runs?
- Clear Split of authority see chart on P. 11 of
outline
FDCPA Liability Revisited
What do you do when you have a barred debt?
1. Is your debt barred? (see above)
2. Is your debt barred by SOL? If yes – 3 options
1. File a proof of claim and advise your client they
will end up at the Supreme Court
2. File a motion to determine the secured status of
your own claim and ask the court for an
FDCPA Liability Revisited
What do you do when you have a barred debt?
1. Is your debt barred by SOL? If yes – 2 options:
1. File a motion to determine the secured status of
your own claim and ask the court for an
extension to file your proof of claim.
2. File the proof of claim and see what happens -
If opposed, ask court to stay its ruling until
Bartram is decided.
FDCPA Liability Revisited
What do you do when you have a barred debt?
1. Is your debt barred by the Statute of Repose?
- Is your debt really barred by the Statute of
Repose? (see above)
- Tough luck – I like by bar license

More Related Content

What's hot

Reported Decisions
Reported DecisionsReported Decisions
Reported Decisions
rpwozniak
 
Gaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of Beneficiaries
Gaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of BeneficiariesGaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of Beneficiaries
Gaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of Beneficiaries
jamesmaredmond
 
D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)
D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)
D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)
Richard Goren
 
54 - Memorandum Decision and Order
54 - Memorandum Decision and Order54 - Memorandum Decision and Order
54 - Memorandum Decision and Order
Stephen Lord
 
Doc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceeding
Doc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceedingDoc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceeding
Doc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceeding
malp2009
 

What's hot (18)

Reported Decisions
Reported DecisionsReported Decisions
Reported Decisions
 
The state of foreclosure law in 2012 final
The state of foreclosure law in 2012 finalThe state of foreclosure law in 2012 final
The state of foreclosure law in 2012 final
 
The state of foreclosure law in 2012
The state of foreclosure law in 2012The state of foreclosure law in 2012
The state of foreclosure law in 2012
 
The state of foreclosure law in 2012 white
The state of foreclosure law in 2012  whiteThe state of foreclosure law in 2012  white
The state of foreclosure law in 2012 white
 
Uop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabus
Uop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabusUop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabus
Uop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabus
 
Gaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of Beneficiaries
Gaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of BeneficiariesGaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of Beneficiaries
Gaggero-Arenzano Interest, '97-'07, in a Class of Beneficiaries
 
D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)
D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)
D'Agostino v Federal Ins Co , 969 F. Supp. 2d 116 (D. Mass. 2013)
 
Uop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabus
Uop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabusUop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabus
Uop acc 543 week 4 exam new syllabus
 
Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status Options, Form #10.003
Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status Options, Form #10.003Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status Options, Form #10.003
Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status Options, Form #10.003
 
20180123 penn intervenors reply brief (Leandro)
20180123 penn intervenors reply brief (Leandro)20180123 penn intervenors reply brief (Leandro)
20180123 penn intervenors reply brief (Leandro)
 
Trial memorandum
Trial memorandumTrial memorandum
Trial memorandum
 
Tickmarks Fall 2006 Article Carey
Tickmarks Fall 2006 Article   CareyTickmarks Fall 2006 Article   Carey
Tickmarks Fall 2006 Article Carey
 
54 - Memorandum Decision and Order
54 - Memorandum Decision and Order54 - Memorandum Decision and Order
54 - Memorandum Decision and Order
 
Settlements
SettlementsSettlements
Settlements
 
Sample meet and confer declaration for motion for judgment on the pleadings i...
Sample meet and confer declaration for motion for judgment on the pleadings i...Sample meet and confer declaration for motion for judgment on the pleadings i...
Sample meet and confer declaration for motion for judgment on the pleadings i...
 
Doc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceeding
Doc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceedingDoc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceeding
Doc723 motion to vacate claims & stay further proceeding
 
Full Opinions for BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell, No. 16-405
Full Opinions for BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell, No. 16-405Full Opinions for BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell, No. 16-405
Full Opinions for BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell, No. 16-405
 
Schnitzer - Order on MIL re SB 814
Schnitzer - Order on MIL re SB 814Schnitzer - Order on MIL re SB 814
Schnitzer - Order on MIL re SB 814
 

Similar to Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0

MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)
MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)
MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)
Rebecca Holmes
 
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Law Office of Ann N. Nguyen
 
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Law Office of Ann N. Nguyen
 
Statute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_lawStatute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_law
EAW1
 
Statute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_lawStatute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_law
buzzer00
 
Negative Pledge fb
Negative Pledge fbNegative Pledge fb
Negative Pledge fb
tinagald
 
Procedural Issues in Bad Faith Litigation
Procedural Issues in Bad Faith LitigationProcedural Issues in Bad Faith Litigation
Procedural Issues in Bad Faith Litigation
Rachel Hamilton
 
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awayDoc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
malp2009
 
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
Liana Prieto
 

Similar to Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0 (20)

Reicon14 session 3 final ppt
Reicon14 session 3 final pptReicon14 session 3 final ppt
Reicon14 session 3 final ppt
 
Divorce: Cancel that line of credit
Divorce: Cancel that line of credit Divorce: Cancel that line of credit
Divorce: Cancel that line of credit
 
Chpt 13 duties
Chpt 13 dutiesChpt 13 duties
Chpt 13 duties
 
Business Law Essays
Business Law EssaysBusiness Law Essays
Business Law Essays
 
MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)
MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)
MEMO.AutoStay.GarnREDACTED (1)
 
When Is The Surety Liable For Attorneys Fees
When Is The Surety Liable For Attorneys FeesWhen Is The Surety Liable For Attorneys Fees
When Is The Surety Liable For Attorneys Fees
 
"Setoffs in Bankruptcy"
"Setoffs in Bankruptcy""Setoffs in Bankruptcy"
"Setoffs in Bankruptcy"
 
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
 
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
 
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
Loan Modification and Bankruptcy Basics Powerpoint Slideshow 2009 NCVAA
 
121815 - OBJECTION TO 120815 ORDER ON OBJECTION (Townsend Matter)
121815 - OBJECTION TO 120815 ORDER ON OBJECTION (Townsend Matter)121815 - OBJECTION TO 120815 ORDER ON OBJECTION (Townsend Matter)
121815 - OBJECTION TO 120815 ORDER ON OBJECTION (Townsend Matter)
 
Statute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_lawStatute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_law
 
Statute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_lawStatute of limitations_california_law
Statute of limitations_california_law
 
Consumer Finance Class Actions & Litigation - Conference Materials
Consumer Finance Class Actions & Litigation - Conference MaterialsConsumer Finance Class Actions & Litigation - Conference Materials
Consumer Finance Class Actions & Litigation - Conference Materials
 
Negative Pledge fb
Negative Pledge fbNegative Pledge fb
Negative Pledge fb
 
Procedural Issues in Bad Faith Litigation
Procedural Issues in Bad Faith LitigationProcedural Issues in Bad Faith Litigation
Procedural Issues in Bad Faith Litigation
 
07/14/14 - RULE 60 & SANCTION MOTION(S) - Ladye Margaret Townsend BANKRUPTCY...
07/14/14 - RULE 60  & SANCTION MOTION(S) - Ladye Margaret Townsend BANKRUPTCY...07/14/14 - RULE 60  & SANCTION MOTION(S) - Ladye Margaret Townsend BANKRUPTCY...
07/14/14 - RULE 60 & SANCTION MOTION(S) - Ladye Margaret Townsend BANKRUPTCY...
 
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-awayDoc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
 
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
 
10000000050
1000000005010000000050
10000000050
 

Time Barred Mortgages in Bankruptcy 2.0

  • 1. TIME BARRED MORTGAGES IN BANKRUPTCY 2.0 Joseph Towne, Esq. Lender Legal Services, LLC
  • 2. Why is this issue important?
  • 3. Why is this issue important? - Both State and Federal Law are in a deep state of disagreement and flux - Filling a Proof of Claim on a consumer debt Barred by the Statute of Limitations or Repose may be a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violation.
  • 4. Why is this issue important? - Debtors can use negative notice and a motion to determine secured status under 11 U.S.C. § 506 as a core proceeding to discharge mortgages in bankruptcy court after confirmation. See In re Brown, 2014 WL 983532 (Bankr. M.D. Fla.) Quiet Title as an adversary proceeding may also available. - Attorneys who file Proofs of claim on a time barred debts may be subject to penalties under Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 9011 - Candor to the court under Fla. R. Prof Conduct 4-3.3(a)(1)
  • 5. FDCPA Liability-Recent Cases - Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 758 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2014). - Facts: Creditor regularly purchases stale debts and files proofs of claim in bankruptcy court. Creditor filed a proof of claim on a debt barred under Alabama law and debtor filed an adversary proceeding alleging FDCPA violation. Creditor admitted that the debt at issue in this case would be unenforceable in state court and the creditor.
  • 6. FDCPA Liability - Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 758 F.3d 1254 (11th Cir. 2014). - Held: since the debt was unenforceable under state law, filing a proof of claim was an FDCPA violation. - The reasonable consumer standard applies to proofs of claims filed by attorneys in the bankruptcy context
  • 7. FDCPA Liability - However the second circuit, the Northern District of Illinois, Southern District of Illinois, and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania hold that a proof of claim on a time barred debt is not an FDCPA violation
  • 8. FDCPA Liability- LVNV Strikes Back - Donaldson v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 1:14-cv-01979-LJM-TAB; 2015 WL 1539607 (S.D. Ind. 2015 April 7, 2015). - Facts: Debtor files Ch.13. LVNV files proofs of claims on credit cards that were barred under Indiana law because more than 6 years passed from the last payment made. Debtor files complaint for violation of the FDCPA.
  • 9. FDCPA Liability- LVNV Strikes Back - Donaldson v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 2015 WL 1539607 (S.D. Ind. 2015 April 7, 2015). Held: Not false or deceptive when debtor lists debt on his schedules. Under Indiana law debt was still owed even though it was barred. Applied the competent lawyer standard, not least sophisticated consumer standard
  • 10. FDCPA Liability Torres v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, 2015 WL 1529297 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 7, 2015) Facts: Debtor files a Chapter 13 in 2013. Creditor files a proof of claim for small debt with a last payment and transaction of June 10, 2002 outside of Pennsylvania’s four year statute of limitations. Debtor files a complaint for violation of FDCPA.
  • 11. FDCPA Liability Torres v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, 2015 WL 1529297 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 7, 2015) Held: Not possible to sue under the FDCPA for any violation in a proof of claim filed under the Bankruptcy Code. The remedies under the Code (9011) were sufficient “the Court will not insert judicially created remedies into Congress’s carefully calibrated bankruptcy scheme, thus tilting the balance of rights and obligations between debtors and creditors.”
  • 12. FDCPA Liability Bad News: We don’t live in those jurisdictions So how do we avoid liability until SCOTUS resolves the conflict? First, find out if your debt is barred
  • 13. State Law: Its not just the place you find the homestead exemption anymore Choice of law for determining the limitations statute for mortgages is the same under both Federal and Florida – local laws of situs subject to preemption
  • 14. State Law: Its not just the place you find the homestead exemption anymore - Judgment – collateral estoppel law of the state is applied to determine judgment’s preclusive effect - However, the bankruptcy court retains exclusive jurisdiction to determine dischargeability. St. Laurent v. Ambrose, 991 F.2d 672, 675 (11th Cir. 1993).
  • 15. WHAT IS A MORTGAGE? - Any written instrument securing money or advances (i.e. a Note). - Installment Notes, Balloon Notes, Revolving Credit Agreements, Equitable Mortgages
  • 16. COVENANTS - Payments - Due on Sale Clause - Occupancy - Acceleration based on a government taking - Taxes - Insurance - Miscellaneous – e.g. mortgagor provide service Dogs
  • 17. Which Statute of Limitations applies to Mortgages? Trick Question: 2 statutes – statute of limitations and statute of repose
  • 18. Statute of Limitations - Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(C) – within 5 years of accrual - A procedural Statute that prevents the enforcement of the cause of action that has accrued. Houck Corp.
  • 19. Statute of Limitations - Prevents the enforcement of the remedy rather than the termination of the substantive rights of the parties. Allie v. Ionata
  • 20. Five years from What? - Last Element occurs. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c) - 4 elements of a foreclosure action - (1) an agreement (2) a default (3) acceleration of debt to maturity (4) damages. Ernest v. Carter, 368 So.2d 428, 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
  • 21. Five years from What? - Majority Opinion - Central Home Trust Co. v. Lippincott, 392 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) – Acceleration starts the clock - when some affirmative action is taken to accelerate the debt such as “… making an oral demand, and alleging acceleration in a pleading filed in a suit on the debt.”
  • 22. Five years from What? - What if there is no acceleration clause? - You cannot foreclose the mortgage. Reed v. Lincoln 731 So.2d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) BUT: you can sue for future damages under the note. National Educ. Centers, Inc. v. Kirkland, 635 So.2d 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
  • 23. Optional vs. Absolute Acceleration Clauses - Optional – says acceleration does not occur until plaintiff exercises the option. i.e. Lippencott - Absolute – Says that upon default future payments are immediately accelerated. Baader v. Walker, 153 So.2d 51 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963).
  • 24. Optional vs. Absolute Acceleration Clauses - Can a presuit letter be the “acceleration”? Held: not an acceleration because conduct was to occur in the future. Snow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 156 So.3d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) “If you do not pay the full amount of the default, we shall accelerate the entire sum of both principal and interest due and payable....”. Mortgage contained an optional acceleration clause.
  • 25. Minority/Dicta Position – Date of Default - Mostly Dicta and inaccurate restatement of Florida Law - CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC v. Unknown Heirs of Gendron, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); Dorta v. Wilmington Trust Nat. Ass’n, No. 5:13-cv-185-Oc-10PRL, 2014 WL 1152917 (M.D. Fla. March 24, 2014); Kaan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2013 WL 5944074 (S.D.Fla. Nov. 5, 2013)
  • 26. Statute of Repose - Fla. Stat. § 95.281 - a substantive statute which not only bars enforcement of an accrued cause of action but may also prevent the accrual of a cause of action where the final element necessary for its creation occurs beyond the time period established by the statute. Houck Corp. v. New River, Ltd, 900 So.2d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
  • 27. Statute of Repose - Either 5 years after the date of maturity if the maturity date is ascertainable from the record . . . OR - If the maturity date is not ascertainable - 20 years after the date of the [execution of the] mortgage unless the note has a definite maturity date, etc.
  • 28. Ascertainable from the record - Must be clearly visible on the face of the recorded mortgage. CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC v. Unknown Heirs of Gendron, 40 Fla. L. Weekly D244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).
  • 30. Federal Preemption - FDIC Assignee - enjoys a six year limitations period that trumps both the Statute of limitations and the statute of repose. 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(14)(A). WRH Mortg. Inc. v. Butler, 684 So.2d 325 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). - Runs from the later of the accrual of the cause of Action or the date the FDIC takes over as receiver
  • 31. - SBA Administration Assignee – infinite time to foreclose because there is no limitations period stated in the Small Business Administration Act. See Magnolia Federal Bank for Savings v. The United States of America, (U.S.D.C. So. Dist. Miss. 1993). See generally, United States v. Alvarado, 5 F.3d 1425 (11th Cir. Fla. 1993). - Assignee of the USA acquires right to unlimited time to foreclose. LPP Mtg Ltd. v. Tucker, 48 So.3d 115 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2010). Federal Preemption
  • 32. Federal Preemption United States of America as Mortgagee – Same as SBA Unlimited time to foreclose - 28 U.S.C. § 2415(c) states “nothing herein shall be deemed to limit the time for bringing an action to establish the title to, or right of possession of real or personal property”.
  • 34. Tolling Death or incapacitation of the Mortgagee before the expiration of the cause of action (Applies to both limitations and repose) (if death) the action may be commenced within 12 months from the date of the mortgagee’s death. Fla. Stat. § 733.104 (if incapacitation) within one year of appointment by the guardian. Fla. Stat. § 744.394
  • 35. Tolling Future Advance Clause - If the mortgage contains a future advance clause under Fla. Stat. § 697.04, then future advances made under the mortgage can extend the maturity date from five years to 20 years. See Razak v. Marina Club of Tampa Homeowners Assn., Inc., 968 So.2d 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Typically seen in construction loans
  • 36. Tolling - Bankruptcy 11 U.S.C.A. § 108 applies to both repose and limitations - If the cause of action was not barred before the filing then you have the later of - The end of the original statute of limitations OR - 30 days after the notice of termination or expiration of the automatic stay.
  • 37. Tolling Fla. Stat. § 95.051 (outline at p.6) limitations only - Absence of defendant from state - Use by Defendant of a false name - Concealment by Defendant in state - Payment of any part of the principle or interest of any obligation or liability founded on instrument - Incapacity or minority of plaintiff to sue and no guardian exists
  • 38. Tolling - Equitable tolling – Prudent Plaintiff runs astray
  • 39. Tolling - Equitable tolling – Prudent Plaintiff runs astray - Does not require active deception on the part of the defendant but focuses on the plaintiff with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights - Examples: - Mislead or lulled into inaction - In some extraordinary way been prevented from asserting rights - Timely asserted rights in wrong forum
  • 40. Tolling Equitable Estoppel a.k.a. Wrongdoing by Defendant
  • 41. Tolling Equitable Estoppel a.k.a. Wrongdoing by Defendant - Plaintiff must plead that Plaintiff knew it had a cause of action but defendants wrong doing prevented plaintiff from bringing a timely action - Plaintiff and defendant know about the facts giving rise to the suit but the wrongdoer prevails upon the other to forego enforcing his right until the statutory time has elapsed
  • 42. Tolling - Oral Promise to pay may also toll the statute of limitations - Oral promise to pay or make partial payment if made prior to the statute of limitations tolls the statute of limitations. Jacksonville Am. Pub. Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 197 So. 672, 676 (Fla. 1940)
  • 43. Tolling - Counterclaims for recoupment. See p.7 of outline
  • 44. What happens when the statute of limitations runs?
  • 45. What happens when the statute of limitations runs? - Singleton v. Greymar Associates, 882 So.2d 1004, 1008 (Fla. 2004) - Each new default is a breach which may be separately accelerated (in the context of res judicata)
  • 46. What happens when the statute of limitations runs? - U.S. Bank v. Bartram, 140 So.3d 1007 (5th DCA 2014). - Each new default represents a new cause of action which may be an independent basis to accelerate the loan again - Currently pending in supreme court – oral argument set for October 6, 2015.
  • 47. What happens when the statute of limitations runs? Third DCA - Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Amer. V. Beauvais, 2014 WL 7156961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Bartram only applies to a subsequent action that follows a dismissal with prejudice. Dismissals without prejudice including voluntary dismissals do not reset statute of limitations. Deceleration notice may reset the action for SOL purposes, but unforeclosable lien remains in force until the expiration of the repose.
  • 48. What happens when the statute of limitations runs? - Clear Split of authority see chart on P. 11 of outline
  • 49. FDCPA Liability Revisited What do you do when you have a barred debt? 1. Is your debt barred? (see above) 2. Is your debt barred by SOL? If yes – 3 options 1. File a proof of claim and advise your client they will end up at the Supreme Court 2. File a motion to determine the secured status of your own claim and ask the court for an
  • 50. FDCPA Liability Revisited What do you do when you have a barred debt? 1. Is your debt barred by SOL? If yes – 2 options: 1. File a motion to determine the secured status of your own claim and ask the court for an extension to file your proof of claim. 2. File the proof of claim and see what happens - If opposed, ask court to stay its ruling until Bartram is decided.
  • 51. FDCPA Liability Revisited What do you do when you have a barred debt? 1. Is your debt barred by the Statute of Repose? - Is your debt really barred by the Statute of Repose? (see above) - Tough luck – I like by bar license