SlideShare a Scribd company logo
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 1
Theory Analysis Paper
Nikki Nadler
HDFS 3920
Dr. Jennifer George
September 28, 2020
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 2
Theory Analysis Paper
A nuclear family system, consists of a father, a mother, and children that have defined
roles. In the film, “Gifted,” Mary’s family system is very different from the nuclear family
system (Allen et al., 2017). Mary is a seven-year old girl that is raised by her Uncle Frank after
her mother passes away. Mary’s grandmother, Evelyn, is trying to win custody of Mary because
she believes Frank does not create a healthy emotional climate for her. Evelyn tries to keep the
family legacy of being a mathematician by trying to live vicariously through Mary’s
extraordinary math ability. The film explores how conflict in the family creates a lack of
cohesion within the family system.
First Order Tasks and Second Order Tasks
First order tasks are essential components in defining features of a family (Anderson &
Sabatelli, 2011). According to Anderson and Sabatelli, “First order tasks are the objectives that
the family is charged with fulfilling regardless of its particular composition, socioeconomic
status, and cultural, ethnic, or racial heritage (2011, p.11). No matter what the family structure is,
every family must accomplish first order tasks. The tasks consist of emotional climate, identity
tasks, maintenance tasks, and boundary tasks. Each family has different strategies they use to
manage stress and transition (J. George, personal communication, [August 26, 2020]).
Emotional Climate
The goals of an emotional climate are to provide nurture and support, family cohesion,
manage conflict and tension, and promote health and well-being (J. George, personal
communication, [September 2, 2020]). Frank provides a nurturing and supporting environment
for Mary by sending her to school and allowing her to experience a normal childhood (Allen et
al., 2017). Since Mary’s mother, Diane, has passed, Frank believes he is raising Mary how Diane
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 3
would want her to be raised. Evelyn, Frank and Diane’s mother, believes he is not supporting
Mary by sending her to a normal school which causes conflict and tension in the family system.
Denial is a conflict strategy that is used by Evelyn. She tries to minimize the idea that she
controlled Diane her whole life, which is what she is trying to do for Mary. Tension and conflict
creates an unsafe emotional climate and lack of cohesion (J. George, personal communication,
[August 26, 2020]). The lack of family cohesion comes from Evelyn believing her ideas to be
superior to Frank’s and she should have custody of Mary. Evelyn desire to be in control pushes
her and Frank further into disagreement (Allen et al., 2017).
Family Identity
A family’s identity is created by themes and legacies that are passed down from
generations (J. George, personal communication, [August 28, 2020]). Evelyn was a
mathematician as well as her daughter Diane (Allen et al., 2017). The family has the theme of
having extraordinary abilities in mathematics and Evelyn wants Mary to carry on the legacy of
being a mathematician like her and her mother were. Evelyn went to Cambridge University
where she researched mathematics and her daughter Diane was mathematician whose focus was
solving a math problem no one has ever solved. Evelyn pushed Diane all her life and she did not
have the opportunity to have a normal childhood. She did not play any sports or have any
involvement with children her age, her only focus was math. Diane and Evelyn had poor
differentiation. They were very interconnected and Evelyn controlled her individual identity and
prevented her from seeking experiences outside of the world of math which was not healthy for
her development. Frank saw how unhappy his sister was throughout her life and how math
ultimately led to her taking her own life and he does not want that for Mary. Frank was well
differentiated from the family and had his own identity separate from Evelyn’s which caused
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 4
tension. Evelyn did not like the idea of Mary becoming her own person and branching out from
the family legacy. Evelyn tries to live vicariously through Mary by pushing so strongly towards
her going to a school for gifted children and fighting for custody of Mary.
Maintenance Tasks
Family themes and maintenance tasks are closely connected (Anderson & Sabatelli,
2011). According to Anderson and Sabatelli, “Maintenance resources consists of time, energy,
and money that the family must use to accomplish its maintenance tasks (2011, p. 28). Frank is a
boat repairman in a small town in Florida while Evelyn is a prestigious woman in Massachusetts
(Allen et al., 2017). She believes that Frank is not able to provide for Mary although he provides
food, shelter, and an education for her. Although it is not the education Evelyn wants for Mary it
is still an education. Just because Evelyn would use her maintenance resources differently, she
tells the court that Frank is not fit to have custody of Mary. Frank is slightly underorganized and
lacks consistency on his maintenance tasks although he does accomplish them. Evelyn is over
organized which creates a lack of creativity and spontaneity (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011).
Evelyn has her life and Mary’s life planned out the way she wants it to go and anything outside
of that plan is unacceptable (Allen et al., 2017). She is not flexible nor is she open to any ideas
that Frank has for Mary. Since Frank does not have an organized life plan for Mary, Evelyn sees
him as unfit to be Mary’s guardian.
Boundary Tasks
Boundaries separate each subsystem in a family from other subsystems (J. George,
personal communication, [August 31, 2020]). Evelyn has a relatively closed boundary, which
means no one else is welcome from outside the family and there is a sense of privacy (Allen et
al., 2017). She does not want Mary to live a life filled with friends and hobbies and wants math
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 5
to be her only focus. Evelyn does not trust that a normal school will give Mary the education she
deserves. She sets her own rules for Mary and does not allow Frank to intervene. Evelyn wanting
Mary to be just like her and Diane, creates an enmeshed internal boundary because it does not
allow for individuality (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). The enmeshed boundary is created by
Evelyn structuring who Mary has interactions with and encouraging her to be dependent on
Evelyn (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). Frank creates an internal disengaged boundary because he
promotes for Mary to have autonomy and live a normal life like he believes Diane would want
for her (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011).
Second Order Tasks
Second order tasks are the strategies used by families to manage conflict and stress to
make for a better emotional climate (J. George, personal communication, [August 26, 2020]).
Von Bertalanffy says, “To understand the relationship between stress and adaptability, system
theorists introduced the concepts of morphostasis and morphogenesis (Anderson & Sabatelli,
2011, p. 32). Morphostasis is when we resist change to strategies even when we know they are
not working (J. George, personal communication, [August 28, 2020]). Evelyn experiences
morphostasis because she has a set plan for Mary that she is not willing to change (Allen et al.,
2017). She denies Frank of all of his ideas to let Mary be a normal child because it does not fit
her plan. Evelyn believes if she raises Mary in the same way she did Diane, that Mary will also
be a mathematician. There are times where it is appropriate for morphostasis but in Evelyn’s
situation it lowers the functioning of the family system (J. George, personal communication,
[August 26, 2020]). Evelyn resisting change creates tension between her and Frank which is not
a healthy environment for Mary (Allen et al., 2017).
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 6
First order tasks and second order tasks are common to all families (J. George, personal
communication, [August 26, 2020]). The way a family fulfills the tasks vary from family to
family, but it is necessary that each family accomplishes them. Through emotional climate,
family identity, maintenance tasks, and boundary tasks, families are able to grow and develop
over time. `
Case Study of Social Factors
Social factors that influenced Mary’s life include her family life cycle, social influences,
celebrations and rituals, and philosophy of life (Allen et al., 2017). Each of these contribute to
how Mary’s identity and shape the way she sees the world. After the loss of Mary’s mother, her
uncle raised her which led to a custody battle between him and his mother. This impacted Mary’s
family system and development greatly.
Family Life Cycle
Mary’s life cycle was anything but normal. According to Derrick & Lehfeld, “The basic
assumption underlying the family life-cycle approach is that most households pass through an
orderly progression of stages each with its own characteristic financial situation and purchasing
patterns (1980, p. 240). There has been an increase in the nontraditional family life cycle (Glick,
1989). The family life cycle begins with marriage which was not how Mary’s life cycle began
(Allan & Henderson, 2017). Her mother died after birth and her father was never around which is
why Frank had custody of her (Allen et al., 2017). The family life cycle is flawed because it does
not allow for nontraditional alternatives, like being raised by an Uncle (Derrick & Lehfeld,
1980). It has influenced Frank to take on the role of the mother and father for Mary (Allen et al.,
2017). If a family is unable to accomplish the stages in a life cycle, there can be stress and
unhappiness within the family (Allan & Henderson, 2017). The custody battle between Frank
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 7
and Evelyn causes a lot of tension within the family (Allen et al., 2017). Mary’s mathematical
ability that is way above her years made her skip stages that the average child would experience.
Frank wants to keep Mary in school with children her own age to create a traditional family life
cycle for her as best he can. Classifying a child into stage forces them to follow a normative life
cycle and doesn’t allow for alternative life cycles (Derrick & Lehfeld, 1980). Although Mary
experienced an alternative family life cycle, she still went on to be successful (Allen et al., 2017).
Social Factors
Social support is a factor that shaped and influence Mary’s life (Allen et al., 2017).
According to Gordon Jack, “Network relationships can be sources of both support and stress”
(2000, p. 3). The relationship between Frank and Mary is very supportive whereas Frank and
Evelyn’s relationship is one of stress (Allen et al., 2017). Frank provides social support for Mary
by taking on the role as Mary’s mother and father. Evelyn’s harsh parenting and favoritism
towards Diane created resilience between Frank and her. Her background of being a prestigious
mathematician has created an idea of perfectionism that she is trying to maintain for her whole
family. Evelyn raised her daughter with strict intentions of making her a mathematician and she
is trying to put that pressure onto Mary. Evelyn socially isolated Dianne which is a risk factor
that led her to taking her own life (Jack, 2000). Frank fears that if Evelyn were to get custody of
Mary that she would become socially isolated like her mother (Allen et al., 2017). Frank allows
Mary to have social integration by going to a normal school with children her age which
influences good health and a psychological well-being. The family’s first order tasks are still
fulfilled even though the family composition is not of a typical family.
Celebrations and Rituals
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 8
Families that have routines and rituals are connected to child adjustment, marital
satisfaction, and parenting competence (Fies et al., 2002). Rituals support families during
stressful times and are powerful organizers family history. Daily rituals in the family consist of
Frank making Mary a bowl of cereal and taking her to school (Allen et al., 2017). Rituals provide
meaning and continuity across generations (Fies et al., 2002). Although it does not seem
extravagant, it creates a routine and structure in Mary’s life (Allen et al., 2017). Every Saturday,
Mary spends the mornings with her neighbor Reberta and then Mary and Frank watch UFC
together. It is important to Frank that Mary is able to experience a typical childhood because
Mary’s mother was not able to do so and he wants to provide a positive emotional climate for
her. It is important to Evelyn that she Mary continues the legacy of being a mathematician.
Philosophy of Life
According to Hooman and Kong, “Childhood adversity may restrict individuals’ sense of
purpose in life” (2020, p. 1). Mary faces many adversities at a young age such as losing her
mother and not having her father in her life (Allen et al., 2017). She begins acting out at school
because she believes she doesn’t belong there. Frank tries to create a normal life for Mary that
has a purpose other than solving a math problem. Diane’s only purpose in life was to solve a
math problem which led her to taking her life and Frank believes that Diane wouldn’t want the
same for Mary. Frank wants Mary to live her own life and make her own decisions without the
pressure of Evelyn. Evelyn tries making meaning in her life by living vicariously through Diane
and Mary. Frank finds it important to allow Mary to find her own purpose in life without the
influence of Evelyn.
The family systems theory focuses on how each subsystem within a family influences
each other (Allan & Henderson, 2017). Frank was well differentiated and wanted Mary to be
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 9
well differentiated as well. If Evelyn got custody of Mary, she would be poorly differentiated
like Evelyn and Diane (Allen et al., 2017). Frank wanted Mary to be able to relate to others and
be an average girl instead of being controlled by Evelyn. Frank tried to maintain functionality
within the family system as best as he could by raising Mary the way he believed Diane would
want her to. Evelyn had a very low adaptability to the way Frank was raising Mary and wanted
to do it her own way. She was very rigid and stern in her ways which caused the family system
to have a lack of cohesion.
THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 10
References
Allan, Katherine R. & Henderson, Angel C. (2017). Family Theories: Foundations and
Applications. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Allen, M., Basner, G., Browning, B., Cohen, A., Knowles, T.K., Lunder, K., & Ryant, C. (2017).
Gifted [Motion picture]. United States of America: Searchlight Pictures.
Anderson, Stephen A, and Ronald M. Sabatelli. (2011). Family Interaction: A Multigenerational
Developmental Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson/A & B.
Derrick, F. W., & Lehfeld, A. K. (1980). The Family Life Cycle: An Alternative
Approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 214–217. https://doi-org.proxy-
remote.galib.uga.edu/10.1086/208809
Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review
of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for
celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 381–390. https://doi-org.proxy-
remote.galib.uga.edu/10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.381
Glick, P. (1989). The Family Life Cycle and Social Change. Family Relations, 38(2), 123-129. =
doi:10.2307/583663
Gordon, Jack. (2000). Ecological Influences on Parenting and Child Development. The British
Journal of Social Work, 30(6), 703.
Homan, K. J., & Kong, J. (2020). Longitudinal health consequences of childhood adversity: The
mediating role of purpose in life. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. https://doi-
org.proxy-remote.galib.uga.edu/10.1080/01634372.2020.1808140

More Related Content

Similar to Theory Analysis Paper

Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paperHdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
JacquelineBenitezAlf
 
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paperHdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
JacquelineBenitezAlf
 
Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like
Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like
Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like
mickietanger
 
Adolescent mothers
Adolescent mothersAdolescent mothers
Adolescent mothers
Michela Rossetti
 
Adolescent mothers
Adolescent mothersAdolescent mothers
Adolescent mothers
Michela Rossetti
 
197 family functions and communication patterns
197 family functions and communication patterns197 family functions and communication patterns
197 family functions and communication patterns
janvicmateo
 
Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper
Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper
Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper
KenadiDavis
 
Each response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to t
Each response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to tEach response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to t
Each response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to t
eleanorabarrington
 
1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx
1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx
1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx
felicidaddinwoodie
 
Patient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docx
Patient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docxPatient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docx
Patient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docx
danhaley45372
 
Why Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And What
Why Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And WhatWhy Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And What
Why Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And Whatnoahmcclain5
 
The Family communication process
The Family communication processThe Family communication process
The Family communication process
Evonne Mwangale Kiptinness
 

Similar to Theory Analysis Paper (15)

Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paperHdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
 
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paperHdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
Hdfs 3920 final theory analysis paper
 
BRubison-Unit 9-SRC
BRubison-Unit 9-SRCBRubison-Unit 9-SRC
BRubison-Unit 9-SRC
 
Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like
Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like
Response 1I grew up believing that other families were like
 
Adolescent mothers
Adolescent mothersAdolescent mothers
Adolescent mothers
 
Adolescent mothers
Adolescent mothersAdolescent mothers
Adolescent mothers
 
197 family functions and communication patterns
197 family functions and communication patterns197 family functions and communication patterns
197 family functions and communication patterns
 
Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper
Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper
Family Systems Theory Analysis Paper
 
Each response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to t
Each response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to tEach response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to t
Each response needs to be ½ page or moreRespond to t
 
1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx
1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx
1Families and Children JupiterimagesCreatasThinkstock.docx
 
Patient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docx
Patient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docxPatient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docx
Patient  AllisonWritten by Danae L. Hudson, Ph.D.Missou.docx
 
Why Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And What
Why Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And WhatWhy Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And What
Why Women Remain In Abusive Relationships And What
 
SFNZ PN DEC 2014 (1)
SFNZ PN DEC 2014 (1)SFNZ PN DEC 2014 (1)
SFNZ PN DEC 2014 (1)
 
Powerpoint
PowerpointPowerpoint
Powerpoint
 
The Family communication process
The Family communication processThe Family communication process
The Family communication process
 

Recently uploaded

MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANE
MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANEMRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANE
MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANE
DK PAGEANT
 
Unique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptx
Unique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptxUnique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptx
Unique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptx
Andrews Jewelers
 
30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf
30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf
30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf
minaserver6679
 
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les Français
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les FrançaisLa transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les Français
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les Français
Ipsos France
 
EXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPAREL
EXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPARELEXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPAREL
EXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPAREL
6ctbkfpdxz
 
Exploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptx
Exploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptxExploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptx
Exploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptx
Ruth Elisabeth Hancock
 
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Years
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the YearsJohnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Years
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Years
greendigital
 
Gujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in school
Gujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in schoolGujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in school
Gujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in school
shouryajoshi5
 
erevna-influencers-social-media-stin-ellada
erevna-influencers-social-media-stin-elladaerevna-influencers-social-media-stin-ellada
erevna-influencers-social-media-stin-ellada
rvlassopoulou
 
What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must Read
What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must ReadWhat To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must Read
What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must Read
Andrews Jewelers
 
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...
Kitchen on Fire
 
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdf
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdfCare Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdf
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdf
sundazesurf80
 

Recently uploaded (12)

MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANE
MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANEMRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANE
MRS PUNE 2024 - WINNER AMRUTHAA UTTAM JAGDHANE
 
Unique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptx
Unique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptxUnique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptx
Unique Wedding Bands For Women Who Want To Stand Out.pptx
 
30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf
30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf
30 Manipulation Techniques to be a smart person in society (1).pdf
 
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les Français
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les FrançaisLa transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les Français
La transidentité, un sujet qui fractionne les Français
 
EXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPAREL
EXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPARELEXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPAREL
EXPERIENCE MONSTER BITES STREETWEAR APPAREL
 
Exploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptx
Exploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptxExploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptx
Exploring Ancient Mysteries Visions of Atlantis.pptx
 
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Years
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the YearsJohnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Years
Johnny Depp Long Hair: A Signature Look Through the Years
 
Gujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in school
Gujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in schoolGujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in school
Gujarat Details in Hindi for children's for presentation in school
 
erevna-influencers-social-media-stin-ellada
erevna-influencers-social-media-stin-elladaerevna-influencers-social-media-stin-ellada
erevna-influencers-social-media-stin-ellada
 
What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must Read
What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must ReadWhat To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must Read
What To Do If Your Ring Is Too Big? Must Read
 
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...
From Stress to Success How Oakland's Corporate Wellness Programs are Cultivat...
 
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdf
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdfCare Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdf
Care Instructions for Activewear & Swim Suits.pdf
 

Theory Analysis Paper

  • 1. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 1 Theory Analysis Paper Nikki Nadler HDFS 3920 Dr. Jennifer George September 28, 2020
  • 2. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 2 Theory Analysis Paper A nuclear family system, consists of a father, a mother, and children that have defined roles. In the film, “Gifted,” Mary’s family system is very different from the nuclear family system (Allen et al., 2017). Mary is a seven-year old girl that is raised by her Uncle Frank after her mother passes away. Mary’s grandmother, Evelyn, is trying to win custody of Mary because she believes Frank does not create a healthy emotional climate for her. Evelyn tries to keep the family legacy of being a mathematician by trying to live vicariously through Mary’s extraordinary math ability. The film explores how conflict in the family creates a lack of cohesion within the family system. First Order Tasks and Second Order Tasks First order tasks are essential components in defining features of a family (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). According to Anderson and Sabatelli, “First order tasks are the objectives that the family is charged with fulfilling regardless of its particular composition, socioeconomic status, and cultural, ethnic, or racial heritage (2011, p.11). No matter what the family structure is, every family must accomplish first order tasks. The tasks consist of emotional climate, identity tasks, maintenance tasks, and boundary tasks. Each family has different strategies they use to manage stress and transition (J. George, personal communication, [August 26, 2020]). Emotional Climate The goals of an emotional climate are to provide nurture and support, family cohesion, manage conflict and tension, and promote health and well-being (J. George, personal communication, [September 2, 2020]). Frank provides a nurturing and supporting environment for Mary by sending her to school and allowing her to experience a normal childhood (Allen et al., 2017). Since Mary’s mother, Diane, has passed, Frank believes he is raising Mary how Diane
  • 3. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 3 would want her to be raised. Evelyn, Frank and Diane’s mother, believes he is not supporting Mary by sending her to a normal school which causes conflict and tension in the family system. Denial is a conflict strategy that is used by Evelyn. She tries to minimize the idea that she controlled Diane her whole life, which is what she is trying to do for Mary. Tension and conflict creates an unsafe emotional climate and lack of cohesion (J. George, personal communication, [August 26, 2020]). The lack of family cohesion comes from Evelyn believing her ideas to be superior to Frank’s and she should have custody of Mary. Evelyn desire to be in control pushes her and Frank further into disagreement (Allen et al., 2017). Family Identity A family’s identity is created by themes and legacies that are passed down from generations (J. George, personal communication, [August 28, 2020]). Evelyn was a mathematician as well as her daughter Diane (Allen et al., 2017). The family has the theme of having extraordinary abilities in mathematics and Evelyn wants Mary to carry on the legacy of being a mathematician like her and her mother were. Evelyn went to Cambridge University where she researched mathematics and her daughter Diane was mathematician whose focus was solving a math problem no one has ever solved. Evelyn pushed Diane all her life and she did not have the opportunity to have a normal childhood. She did not play any sports or have any involvement with children her age, her only focus was math. Diane and Evelyn had poor differentiation. They were very interconnected and Evelyn controlled her individual identity and prevented her from seeking experiences outside of the world of math which was not healthy for her development. Frank saw how unhappy his sister was throughout her life and how math ultimately led to her taking her own life and he does not want that for Mary. Frank was well differentiated from the family and had his own identity separate from Evelyn’s which caused
  • 4. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 4 tension. Evelyn did not like the idea of Mary becoming her own person and branching out from the family legacy. Evelyn tries to live vicariously through Mary by pushing so strongly towards her going to a school for gifted children and fighting for custody of Mary. Maintenance Tasks Family themes and maintenance tasks are closely connected (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). According to Anderson and Sabatelli, “Maintenance resources consists of time, energy, and money that the family must use to accomplish its maintenance tasks (2011, p. 28). Frank is a boat repairman in a small town in Florida while Evelyn is a prestigious woman in Massachusetts (Allen et al., 2017). She believes that Frank is not able to provide for Mary although he provides food, shelter, and an education for her. Although it is not the education Evelyn wants for Mary it is still an education. Just because Evelyn would use her maintenance resources differently, she tells the court that Frank is not fit to have custody of Mary. Frank is slightly underorganized and lacks consistency on his maintenance tasks although he does accomplish them. Evelyn is over organized which creates a lack of creativity and spontaneity (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). Evelyn has her life and Mary’s life planned out the way she wants it to go and anything outside of that plan is unacceptable (Allen et al., 2017). She is not flexible nor is she open to any ideas that Frank has for Mary. Since Frank does not have an organized life plan for Mary, Evelyn sees him as unfit to be Mary’s guardian. Boundary Tasks Boundaries separate each subsystem in a family from other subsystems (J. George, personal communication, [August 31, 2020]). Evelyn has a relatively closed boundary, which means no one else is welcome from outside the family and there is a sense of privacy (Allen et al., 2017). She does not want Mary to live a life filled with friends and hobbies and wants math
  • 5. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 5 to be her only focus. Evelyn does not trust that a normal school will give Mary the education she deserves. She sets her own rules for Mary and does not allow Frank to intervene. Evelyn wanting Mary to be just like her and Diane, creates an enmeshed internal boundary because it does not allow for individuality (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). The enmeshed boundary is created by Evelyn structuring who Mary has interactions with and encouraging her to be dependent on Evelyn (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). Frank creates an internal disengaged boundary because he promotes for Mary to have autonomy and live a normal life like he believes Diane would want for her (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011). Second Order Tasks Second order tasks are the strategies used by families to manage conflict and stress to make for a better emotional climate (J. George, personal communication, [August 26, 2020]). Von Bertalanffy says, “To understand the relationship between stress and adaptability, system theorists introduced the concepts of morphostasis and morphogenesis (Anderson & Sabatelli, 2011, p. 32). Morphostasis is when we resist change to strategies even when we know they are not working (J. George, personal communication, [August 28, 2020]). Evelyn experiences morphostasis because she has a set plan for Mary that she is not willing to change (Allen et al., 2017). She denies Frank of all of his ideas to let Mary be a normal child because it does not fit her plan. Evelyn believes if she raises Mary in the same way she did Diane, that Mary will also be a mathematician. There are times where it is appropriate for morphostasis but in Evelyn’s situation it lowers the functioning of the family system (J. George, personal communication, [August 26, 2020]). Evelyn resisting change creates tension between her and Frank which is not a healthy environment for Mary (Allen et al., 2017).
  • 6. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 6 First order tasks and second order tasks are common to all families (J. George, personal communication, [August 26, 2020]). The way a family fulfills the tasks vary from family to family, but it is necessary that each family accomplishes them. Through emotional climate, family identity, maintenance tasks, and boundary tasks, families are able to grow and develop over time. ` Case Study of Social Factors Social factors that influenced Mary’s life include her family life cycle, social influences, celebrations and rituals, and philosophy of life (Allen et al., 2017). Each of these contribute to how Mary’s identity and shape the way she sees the world. After the loss of Mary’s mother, her uncle raised her which led to a custody battle between him and his mother. This impacted Mary’s family system and development greatly. Family Life Cycle Mary’s life cycle was anything but normal. According to Derrick & Lehfeld, “The basic assumption underlying the family life-cycle approach is that most households pass through an orderly progression of stages each with its own characteristic financial situation and purchasing patterns (1980, p. 240). There has been an increase in the nontraditional family life cycle (Glick, 1989). The family life cycle begins with marriage which was not how Mary’s life cycle began (Allan & Henderson, 2017). Her mother died after birth and her father was never around which is why Frank had custody of her (Allen et al., 2017). The family life cycle is flawed because it does not allow for nontraditional alternatives, like being raised by an Uncle (Derrick & Lehfeld, 1980). It has influenced Frank to take on the role of the mother and father for Mary (Allen et al., 2017). If a family is unable to accomplish the stages in a life cycle, there can be stress and unhappiness within the family (Allan & Henderson, 2017). The custody battle between Frank
  • 7. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 7 and Evelyn causes a lot of tension within the family (Allen et al., 2017). Mary’s mathematical ability that is way above her years made her skip stages that the average child would experience. Frank wants to keep Mary in school with children her own age to create a traditional family life cycle for her as best he can. Classifying a child into stage forces them to follow a normative life cycle and doesn’t allow for alternative life cycles (Derrick & Lehfeld, 1980). Although Mary experienced an alternative family life cycle, she still went on to be successful (Allen et al., 2017). Social Factors Social support is a factor that shaped and influence Mary’s life (Allen et al., 2017). According to Gordon Jack, “Network relationships can be sources of both support and stress” (2000, p. 3). The relationship between Frank and Mary is very supportive whereas Frank and Evelyn’s relationship is one of stress (Allen et al., 2017). Frank provides social support for Mary by taking on the role as Mary’s mother and father. Evelyn’s harsh parenting and favoritism towards Diane created resilience between Frank and her. Her background of being a prestigious mathematician has created an idea of perfectionism that she is trying to maintain for her whole family. Evelyn raised her daughter with strict intentions of making her a mathematician and she is trying to put that pressure onto Mary. Evelyn socially isolated Dianne which is a risk factor that led her to taking her own life (Jack, 2000). Frank fears that if Evelyn were to get custody of Mary that she would become socially isolated like her mother (Allen et al., 2017). Frank allows Mary to have social integration by going to a normal school with children her age which influences good health and a psychological well-being. The family’s first order tasks are still fulfilled even though the family composition is not of a typical family. Celebrations and Rituals
  • 8. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 8 Families that have routines and rituals are connected to child adjustment, marital satisfaction, and parenting competence (Fies et al., 2002). Rituals support families during stressful times and are powerful organizers family history. Daily rituals in the family consist of Frank making Mary a bowl of cereal and taking her to school (Allen et al., 2017). Rituals provide meaning and continuity across generations (Fies et al., 2002). Although it does not seem extravagant, it creates a routine and structure in Mary’s life (Allen et al., 2017). Every Saturday, Mary spends the mornings with her neighbor Reberta and then Mary and Frank watch UFC together. It is important to Frank that Mary is able to experience a typical childhood because Mary’s mother was not able to do so and he wants to provide a positive emotional climate for her. It is important to Evelyn that she Mary continues the legacy of being a mathematician. Philosophy of Life According to Hooman and Kong, “Childhood adversity may restrict individuals’ sense of purpose in life” (2020, p. 1). Mary faces many adversities at a young age such as losing her mother and not having her father in her life (Allen et al., 2017). She begins acting out at school because she believes she doesn’t belong there. Frank tries to create a normal life for Mary that has a purpose other than solving a math problem. Diane’s only purpose in life was to solve a math problem which led her to taking her life and Frank believes that Diane wouldn’t want the same for Mary. Frank wants Mary to live her own life and make her own decisions without the pressure of Evelyn. Evelyn tries making meaning in her life by living vicariously through Diane and Mary. Frank finds it important to allow Mary to find her own purpose in life without the influence of Evelyn. The family systems theory focuses on how each subsystem within a family influences each other (Allan & Henderson, 2017). Frank was well differentiated and wanted Mary to be
  • 9. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 9 well differentiated as well. If Evelyn got custody of Mary, she would be poorly differentiated like Evelyn and Diane (Allen et al., 2017). Frank wanted Mary to be able to relate to others and be an average girl instead of being controlled by Evelyn. Frank tried to maintain functionality within the family system as best as he could by raising Mary the way he believed Diane would want her to. Evelyn had a very low adaptability to the way Frank was raising Mary and wanted to do it her own way. She was very rigid and stern in her ways which caused the family system to have a lack of cohesion.
  • 10. THEORY ANALYSIS PAPER Nadler 10 References Allan, Katherine R. & Henderson, Angel C. (2017). Family Theories: Foundations and Applications. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Allen, M., Basner, G., Browning, B., Cohen, A., Knowles, T.K., Lunder, K., & Ryant, C. (2017). Gifted [Motion picture]. United States of America: Searchlight Pictures. Anderson, Stephen A, and Ronald M. Sabatelli. (2011). Family Interaction: A Multigenerational Developmental Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson/A & B. Derrick, F. W., & Lehfeld, A. K. (1980). The Family Life Cycle: An Alternative Approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 214–217. https://doi-org.proxy- remote.galib.uga.edu/10.1086/208809 Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 381–390. https://doi-org.proxy- remote.galib.uga.edu/10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.381 Glick, P. (1989). The Family Life Cycle and Social Change. Family Relations, 38(2), 123-129. = doi:10.2307/583663 Gordon, Jack. (2000). Ecological Influences on Parenting and Child Development. The British Journal of Social Work, 30(6), 703. Homan, K. J., & Kong, J. (2020). Longitudinal health consequences of childhood adversity: The mediating role of purpose in life. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. https://doi- org.proxy-remote.galib.uga.edu/10.1080/01634372.2020.1808140