1. Gail L. Maunula
University of Turku
Faculty of Law
gaimau@utu.fi
The Customer Loyalty Program
The Mobile App
Your Data
& You
2. Source: ECREBO. The UK Loyalty Landscape, 2016. www.ecrebo.com.
Rewards vs. Loyalty
Although they may still use them frequently, just under half of Brits (49%) said
they would be more likely to participate in loyalty schemes if they didn’t need to
carry a loyalty card.
Nearly 9 in 10 (89%) of UK respondents say they would prefer to spend their
money with a brand whose loyalty scheme was quick and easy to use. One of the
complaints about the sign-up process was that it was “yet more paperwork.”
9. Source: “Privacy and competitiveness in the age of big data: The interplay between data protection, competition law and consumer protection in
the Digital Economy”. The European Data Protection Supervisor. March 2014. www.edps.europe.eu
10. Examples of data permissions needed for loyalty apps
The Data Trade-off
★ Device & app history
★ Identity
★ Contacts
★ Location (approximate & fine)
★ Photos / Media / Files (read & modify)
• Storage (read & modify)
• View Wi-Fi connections
• Receive data from internet
• View network connections & full network access
• Control vibration
• Prevent device from sleeping
Data is the “currency for purchasing free services.”
11. Achieving
Data
Consonance
● Sustainability and expansion of mobile app delivered
loyalty programs is a matter of creating harmony and
finding the right frequency between customer
expectations of services and the distillation and
presentation of relevant and mandatory.
Editor's Notes
Gamification
The GDPR will result in changes to how privacy statements should be presented and what they need to include
Use the GDPR to
We are going to move towars awareness and greater transparency with GDPR, this is a challenge for the efficiency hoped for with mobile apps
Armed eith statistics that show the impact of loyalty programs on customer purchasing and customer retention, it is clear that the mobile app is the appr
Logic and architecture AND PRESENTSRION.
The relationship created with the loyalty program still has a goal
Important to convey this to the consumer
Targeted/tailored interactions with customers: Personalized discounts
Consent triggers data sensitivities
Multi vendor
HOw far to go with personalization? What services to deal with on the anonymous data level? (minimize identifiable personal date held) - not only for compliance with the GDPR, but also to protect the customer perception
Distrust through overload of services. How to tailor services to each consumer based on individual consent
Consent gives the consumer a choice, but sometimes the introduction of this choice raises red flags
Use the GDPR to
Multi vendor
Gamification
Use the GDPR to
We are going to move towars awareness and greater transparency with GDPR, this is a challenge for the efficiency hoped for with mobile apps
Induce data sensitivities. Interaction sensitivity
Use of data context
The GDPR will require a shift to more user-centric transparency, meaning that
Technological capabilities mean we will only expand these offerings in the future
Future - Amazon no checkout lines
Certainly we can show the “legitimate business interest”
Distilling and presenting relevant and mandatory privacy statements
Consent triggers data sensitivities
Goal is ppersonalization of services
Multi vendor
HOw far to go with personalization? What services to deal with on the anonymous data level? (minimize identifiable personal date held) - not only for compliance with the GDPR, but also to protect the customer perception
The simple requirement of the GDPR to is not enough to guide in the the design of these s
If we ared ilivering services in an easier wa for consumers, there is also a need to, in the name of greater transparency, bring these statements from the
Distrust through overload of services. How to tailor services to each consumer based on individual consent
Consent gives the consumer a choice, but sometimes the introduction of this choice raises red flags