A Canadian smelting plant located near the US border was emitting large amounts of sulfur dioxide, carried by wind into the US and damaging crops. The US sued Canada at an arbitration tribunal. The tribunal found the smelter had caused damages since 1932 and ordered compensation paid to the US. It also ruled the smelter must take steps to prevent future transboundary pollution damages to the US. This established an important precedent as the first international air pollution case.
This document outlines the principles of state jurisdiction in international law, including the different types of jurisdiction (exclusive, concurrent, criminal, civil) and the general principles on which states claim criminal jurisdiction (territorial, nationality, protective, universality, passive personality). It also discusses conflict of jurisdiction that can arise when multiple states have a valid claim, the process of extradition between states, and immunity from jurisdiction for certain persons and entities under international law like sovereign immunity.
The document discusses India's extradition laws and its extradition treaty with the United States. It defines extradition as the process where one state surrenders a person accused or convicted of a crime to another state. India's Extradition Act of 1962 governs extradition and extradition treaties. For extradition, the requesting state must make a requisition to India providing evidence of an extraditable crime. If a magistrate finds a prima facie case, the fugitive can be committed to prison and later surrendered. The India-US extradition treaty lists extraditable offenses and exceptions. It also allows for temporary surrender of a fugitive to stand trial in the requesting state.
Prize courts are national courts established by belligerent states to determine ownership over enemy property seized at sea, such as goods in violation of blockade or contraband rules. While prize courts apply the establishing state's law, they also aim to follow international law. This was demonstrated in the famous British case The Zamora, which established that prize courts are bound by acts of parliament but not orders contradicting international law. Another important case, The Appam, affirmed a neutral American court's jurisdiction to determine violations of its neutrality when a German-seized British ship entered U.S. waters during WWI.
Asylum provides shelter and protection by a host state to citizens of another state. There are two kinds of asylum: territorial asylum, which is granted within a state's own territory where it has sovereignty, and extra-territorial asylum, which can be granted outside a state's territory in places like embassies, consulates, warships, or international institutions in some cases. Extra-territorial asylum allows states to protect individuals in other states by granting protection in areas considered under the host state's jurisdiction rather than the local state.
Who owns earth and its resources ?
And how much of these resources can be used by the general public ?
This was an important question in the ancient days.
● Accordingly it was the Byzantine Emperor Justinian l who pioneered the concept, which later came to be known as the Public Trust Doctrine.
● PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE is the principle which states that; certain resources like -
the Air, Water, Sea, Forests, Rivers, Ponds, Lakes, Mountains can never be subject to
PRIVATE OWNERSHIP.
● Such sources are a gift of the nature to the mankind as a whole.
● It should be available to all irrespective of race, religion, caste, sex
and social status.
◆ The Doctrine of Public Trust is a highly useful tool in the hands our Judiciary to protect and preserve the environment from the arbitrary and unreasonable actions of the governmental authorities.
◆ These days the influence of private actors (corporate bodies) is increasing globally, there are high chances of misuse of the natural resources or grant of these resources in favour of private players by the governments.
◆ In such cases the Doctrine of Public Trust would work as an effective check of the exercise of power by government with regard to dealings and management of natural resources.
A Canadian smelting plant located near the US border was emitting large amounts of sulfur dioxide, carried by wind into the US and damaging crops. The US sued Canada at an arbitration tribunal. The tribunal found the smelter had caused damages since 1932 and ordered compensation paid to the US. It also ruled the smelter must take steps to prevent future transboundary pollution damages to the US. This established an important precedent as the first international air pollution case.
This document outlines the principles of state jurisdiction in international law, including the different types of jurisdiction (exclusive, concurrent, criminal, civil) and the general principles on which states claim criminal jurisdiction (territorial, nationality, protective, universality, passive personality). It also discusses conflict of jurisdiction that can arise when multiple states have a valid claim, the process of extradition between states, and immunity from jurisdiction for certain persons and entities under international law like sovereign immunity.
The document discusses India's extradition laws and its extradition treaty with the United States. It defines extradition as the process where one state surrenders a person accused or convicted of a crime to another state. India's Extradition Act of 1962 governs extradition and extradition treaties. For extradition, the requesting state must make a requisition to India providing evidence of an extraditable crime. If a magistrate finds a prima facie case, the fugitive can be committed to prison and later surrendered. The India-US extradition treaty lists extraditable offenses and exceptions. It also allows for temporary surrender of a fugitive to stand trial in the requesting state.
Prize courts are national courts established by belligerent states to determine ownership over enemy property seized at sea, such as goods in violation of blockade or contraband rules. While prize courts apply the establishing state's law, they also aim to follow international law. This was demonstrated in the famous British case The Zamora, which established that prize courts are bound by acts of parliament but not orders contradicting international law. Another important case, The Appam, affirmed a neutral American court's jurisdiction to determine violations of its neutrality when a German-seized British ship entered U.S. waters during WWI.
Asylum provides shelter and protection by a host state to citizens of another state. There are two kinds of asylum: territorial asylum, which is granted within a state's own territory where it has sovereignty, and extra-territorial asylum, which can be granted outside a state's territory in places like embassies, consulates, warships, or international institutions in some cases. Extra-territorial asylum allows states to protect individuals in other states by granting protection in areas considered under the host state's jurisdiction rather than the local state.
Who owns earth and its resources ?
And how much of these resources can be used by the general public ?
This was an important question in the ancient days.
● Accordingly it was the Byzantine Emperor Justinian l who pioneered the concept, which later came to be known as the Public Trust Doctrine.
● PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE is the principle which states that; certain resources like -
the Air, Water, Sea, Forests, Rivers, Ponds, Lakes, Mountains can never be subject to
PRIVATE OWNERSHIP.
● Such sources are a gift of the nature to the mankind as a whole.
● It should be available to all irrespective of race, religion, caste, sex
and social status.
◆ The Doctrine of Public Trust is a highly useful tool in the hands our Judiciary to protect and preserve the environment from the arbitrary and unreasonable actions of the governmental authorities.
◆ These days the influence of private actors (corporate bodies) is increasing globally, there are high chances of misuse of the natural resources or grant of these resources in favour of private players by the governments.
◆ In such cases the Doctrine of Public Trust would work as an effective check of the exercise of power by government with regard to dealings and management of natural resources.
What is intervention and when it is permitted under international lawDavid Vishnoi
Intervention is defined as dictatorial interference by one state in the affairs of another state. It generally violates the principle of non-intervention, but international law allows for exceptions including self-defense and collective actions authorized by the UN Security Council. Intervention can involve force (military intervention) or influence without force (diplomatic intervention). Historically other grounds were used to justify intervention such as humanitarianism or enforcing treaty rights, but the UN Charter now prohibits all uses of force or threats of force by states against other states.
The maritime belt refers to the part of the sea under the jurisdiction of coastal states. It extends up to 12 nautical miles from shore, within which the coastal state can exercise sovereignty. Historically, the width of the maritime belt varied depending on the range of cannons, but international agreements in the 20th century standardized it at 12 miles. Within this zone, coastal nations have control over resources and activities as recognized under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
This document discusses several cases related to the strict construction of penal statutes and criminal law. It provides guidelines for determining whether an offense requires mens rea or creates strict liability. Specifically, it establishes that statutes creating criminal offenses must be interpreted as requiring proof of mens rea or criminal intent unless Parliament clearly intended to create a strict liability offense. The document also summarizes several cases where courts interpreted ambiguous language in penal statutes in favor of defendants.
EFL arises when a domestic rule must be preferred over an inconsistent foreign rule. There are three situations where a foreign law may be excluded: 1) foreign revenue, penal, and public laws, 2) foreign expropriatory legislation, and 3) foreign laws repugnant to public policy. Courts will not enforce foreign laws that involve an assertion of sovereign authority by one state in another state's territory, such as claims to recover taxes or enforce confiscation decrees. The situs of the property in question and the state's control over it outside its territory are also considered for foreign expropriatory legislation.
Representative Suit / What is Representative suit / representative suit in de...Asif Mohammad ALFAYED
Representative suits allow one or more persons to file a suit on behalf of themselves and others who have the same interest in the matter. Order 1 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure lays out the process for representative suits. It allows for one or more persons from a group with the same interest to file a suit on behalf of all members of the group, with permission of the court. Notice must also be provided to all interested parties. The key purposes of representative suits are to avoid conflicting judgments, reduce court expenses and complications, and allow for matters to be determined in a single trial. Permission for a representative suit can be granted at any stage of litigation, including the appellate stage. Representative suits differ from personal suits in that personal
The concept of Marriage under Private International Lawcarolineelias239
Marriage is a broad concept under Private international law. Many new rules had been laid down in various decisions, which had developed the international matrimonial law. The relevancy of monogamous or polygamous marriages. And the validity matters like formal validity and essential validity is also discussed here
This document summarizes equitable remedies available under equity law, including injunctions and specific performance. It discusses the circumstances in which these remedies may be granted or refused by courts. Equitable remedies are designed to supplement common law remedies and are granted at the court's discretion to redress wrongs. Specific performance allows a court to order a party to carry out contractual obligations, while injunctions can be prohibitory (to refrain from an act) or mandatory (to perform an act). Courts will consider factors like adequacy of damages, claimant's conduct, readiness to perform contractual obligations, and delay or acquiescence when deciding whether to grant equitable remedies.
The Specific Relief of Act 1877
The Law of Limitation Act, 1908
ARNAB KUMAR DAS
Port City International University,
Chittagong, Bangladesh.
SID: LLB 00305037
The document discusses different approaches to determining the ratio decidendi, or binding legal principle, of a case with multiple or conflicting judgments. It examines the Golaknath case decided by the Indian Supreme Court as an example where five separate judgments were issued. Three main approaches are described: 1) examining the necessary reasoning to support the court's declaration, 2) counting the number of judges supporting each proposition, and 3) identifying the majority view among the majority opinions. The document concludes that pragmatically construing precedents by their rationes, or underlying reasons, is preferable to a rigid analysis.
The document discusses key issues in applying private international law to divorce cases, including multiplicity of forums, recognition of foreign divorce decrees, and India's approach. It notes that multiple countries can have jurisdiction over divorce cases, and recognition of foreign decrees depends on principles of comity and reciprocity. While Indian courts have recognized principles like domicile in divorce cases, the rules are scattered and not codified uniformly, leaving gaps that could allow exploitation. The document argues that India needs coherent legislation to properly deal with divorce and other issues in marriages involving Non-Resident Indians.
CONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATIONShreya Chaurasia
Interpretation means the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by giving the words of the enactment their natural and ordinary meaning.
It is the process of ascertaining the true meaning of the words used in a statute.
The Court is not expected to interpret arbitrarily and therefore there have been certain principles which have evolved out of the continuous exercise by the Courts. These principles are sometimes called ‘rules of interpretation’.
The object of interpretation of statutes is to determine the intention of the legislature conveyed expressly or impliedly in the language used.
Contempornea Expositio means that the meaning of words in a document are to be understood in the sense which they bore at the time of the document.
Contemporaneous exposition is the best and strongest in law. It is said that the best exposition of a statute or any other document is that which it has received from contemporary authority.
Contemporanea expositio est optima means usage or practice developed under a statute is indicative of the meaning ascribed to its words by contemporary opinion.
External Aid includes Historical Background,The original bill drafted and introduced,Legal Dictionaries,Debates in the Legislature,Judicial Construction etc.
The document discusses the legal maxim of noscitur a sociis, which means "a word is known by the company it keeps." It provides examples from case law where courts have used this maxim to interpret terms in context. Specifically, it discusses cases where:
1) The term "entertainment" was interpreted in context of surrounding words like "refreshment" and "resort."
2) The term "interest" was understood to mean "annual interest" based on accompanying words.
3) The term "case or canister" was held to exclude a cloth bag based on the intended strength of the described container.
4) The term "perfume" was interpreted to exclude "
The document discusses several equitable doctrines including conversion, election, satisfaction, and performance. The doctrine of conversion provides that equity treats property as if it is in the form intended by the owner, such as considering money directed to purchase land as the land itself. The doctrines of election and satisfaction deal with situations where a person receives a benefit from a will but is also subject to an associated obligation. The doctrine of performance allows an act other than what was originally required to be viewed as fulfilling an obligation.
This document discusses various aids that judges use when interpreting statutes, including both intrinsic (internal) aids found within the statute as well as extrinsic (external) aids outside the statute.
Some key intrinsic aids discussed are other provisions and context within the act, the title, preamble, headings, marginal notes, provisos, definitions, exceptions, schedules, and illustrations. External aids include parliamentary history, historical facts, subsequent developments, reference to other statutes, contemporary opinion, policy behind the act, precedent, and dictionaries.
The document provides examples of different intrinsic aids like definitions, exceptions, and illustrations used in the Indian Penal Code to help interpret provisions. It emphasizes that the intention of the legislature and circumstances around an
Maxims of Equity and Their Applications in BangladeshPreeti Sikder
Class Lecture Compilation from the course Principles of Equity, Trust and Roman Law
Learning Outcome:
Students will be :
- able to identify the areas of application for major equitable maxims,
- aware about the application opportunities of equitable maxims in Bangladeshi Laws
The document discusses key concepts and terminology related to civil procedure in India according to the Civil Procedure Code of 1908. It defines important legal terms like cause of action, judgement, decree, jurisdiction, res judicata, and discovery. It also outlines the various stages of civil proceedings, including institution of a suit, appearance of parties, remedies, and discovery processes.
This document discusses various rules of statutory interpretation used in legal systems, including the literal rule, golden rule, mischief rule, and purposive rule. It provides more detail on the mischief rule, explaining that it looks at the "mischief" or wrong that a statute is intended to correct in order to discover Parliament's intention. The mischief rule was established in Heydon's Case from 1584. The document also summarizes the 1874 case Gorris v Scott, where the court used the mischief rule to determine that a statute requiring animal pens on ships was intended to prevent disease, not protect against property loss.
This document provides guidance on finding various types of public international law resources such as treaties, case law, UN materials, and customary law. It discusses tools for locating multilateral treaties from the 1920s onward, including subscription databases and free websites. For treaty status information, it recommends the United Nations website and the Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General database. International law reports, cases from international courts, and UN publications are also outlined. Encyclopedias, journals, news sources, and other reference materials are highlighted to aid research.
Cross Border Laws in Business and their Implications Chandandeep Singh
Should Canadian or American multinationals (MNCs) be held accountable in Canada or the USA for the human rights violations that they commit abroad? Why or why not? Still Thinking. Read the document Illustrated with examples.
What is intervention and when it is permitted under international lawDavid Vishnoi
Intervention is defined as dictatorial interference by one state in the affairs of another state. It generally violates the principle of non-intervention, but international law allows for exceptions including self-defense and collective actions authorized by the UN Security Council. Intervention can involve force (military intervention) or influence without force (diplomatic intervention). Historically other grounds were used to justify intervention such as humanitarianism or enforcing treaty rights, but the UN Charter now prohibits all uses of force or threats of force by states against other states.
The maritime belt refers to the part of the sea under the jurisdiction of coastal states. It extends up to 12 nautical miles from shore, within which the coastal state can exercise sovereignty. Historically, the width of the maritime belt varied depending on the range of cannons, but international agreements in the 20th century standardized it at 12 miles. Within this zone, coastal nations have control over resources and activities as recognized under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
This document discusses several cases related to the strict construction of penal statutes and criminal law. It provides guidelines for determining whether an offense requires mens rea or creates strict liability. Specifically, it establishes that statutes creating criminal offenses must be interpreted as requiring proof of mens rea or criminal intent unless Parliament clearly intended to create a strict liability offense. The document also summarizes several cases where courts interpreted ambiguous language in penal statutes in favor of defendants.
EFL arises when a domestic rule must be preferred over an inconsistent foreign rule. There are three situations where a foreign law may be excluded: 1) foreign revenue, penal, and public laws, 2) foreign expropriatory legislation, and 3) foreign laws repugnant to public policy. Courts will not enforce foreign laws that involve an assertion of sovereign authority by one state in another state's territory, such as claims to recover taxes or enforce confiscation decrees. The situs of the property in question and the state's control over it outside its territory are also considered for foreign expropriatory legislation.
Representative Suit / What is Representative suit / representative suit in de...Asif Mohammad ALFAYED
Representative suits allow one or more persons to file a suit on behalf of themselves and others who have the same interest in the matter. Order 1 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure lays out the process for representative suits. It allows for one or more persons from a group with the same interest to file a suit on behalf of all members of the group, with permission of the court. Notice must also be provided to all interested parties. The key purposes of representative suits are to avoid conflicting judgments, reduce court expenses and complications, and allow for matters to be determined in a single trial. Permission for a representative suit can be granted at any stage of litigation, including the appellate stage. Representative suits differ from personal suits in that personal
The concept of Marriage under Private International Lawcarolineelias239
Marriage is a broad concept under Private international law. Many new rules had been laid down in various decisions, which had developed the international matrimonial law. The relevancy of monogamous or polygamous marriages. And the validity matters like formal validity and essential validity is also discussed here
This document summarizes equitable remedies available under equity law, including injunctions and specific performance. It discusses the circumstances in which these remedies may be granted or refused by courts. Equitable remedies are designed to supplement common law remedies and are granted at the court's discretion to redress wrongs. Specific performance allows a court to order a party to carry out contractual obligations, while injunctions can be prohibitory (to refrain from an act) or mandatory (to perform an act). Courts will consider factors like adequacy of damages, claimant's conduct, readiness to perform contractual obligations, and delay or acquiescence when deciding whether to grant equitable remedies.
The Specific Relief of Act 1877
The Law of Limitation Act, 1908
ARNAB KUMAR DAS
Port City International University,
Chittagong, Bangladesh.
SID: LLB 00305037
The document discusses different approaches to determining the ratio decidendi, or binding legal principle, of a case with multiple or conflicting judgments. It examines the Golaknath case decided by the Indian Supreme Court as an example where five separate judgments were issued. Three main approaches are described: 1) examining the necessary reasoning to support the court's declaration, 2) counting the number of judges supporting each proposition, and 3) identifying the majority view among the majority opinions. The document concludes that pragmatically construing precedents by their rationes, or underlying reasons, is preferable to a rigid analysis.
The document discusses key issues in applying private international law to divorce cases, including multiplicity of forums, recognition of foreign divorce decrees, and India's approach. It notes that multiple countries can have jurisdiction over divorce cases, and recognition of foreign decrees depends on principles of comity and reciprocity. While Indian courts have recognized principles like domicile in divorce cases, the rules are scattered and not codified uniformly, leaving gaps that could allow exploitation. The document argues that India needs coherent legislation to properly deal with divorce and other issues in marriages involving Non-Resident Indians.
CONTEMPORNEA EXPOSITIO EXTERNAL AID TO INTERPRETATIONShreya Chaurasia
Interpretation means the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by giving the words of the enactment their natural and ordinary meaning.
It is the process of ascertaining the true meaning of the words used in a statute.
The Court is not expected to interpret arbitrarily and therefore there have been certain principles which have evolved out of the continuous exercise by the Courts. These principles are sometimes called ‘rules of interpretation’.
The object of interpretation of statutes is to determine the intention of the legislature conveyed expressly or impliedly in the language used.
Contempornea Expositio means that the meaning of words in a document are to be understood in the sense which they bore at the time of the document.
Contemporaneous exposition is the best and strongest in law. It is said that the best exposition of a statute or any other document is that which it has received from contemporary authority.
Contemporanea expositio est optima means usage or practice developed under a statute is indicative of the meaning ascribed to its words by contemporary opinion.
External Aid includes Historical Background,The original bill drafted and introduced,Legal Dictionaries,Debates in the Legislature,Judicial Construction etc.
The document discusses the legal maxim of noscitur a sociis, which means "a word is known by the company it keeps." It provides examples from case law where courts have used this maxim to interpret terms in context. Specifically, it discusses cases where:
1) The term "entertainment" was interpreted in context of surrounding words like "refreshment" and "resort."
2) The term "interest" was understood to mean "annual interest" based on accompanying words.
3) The term "case or canister" was held to exclude a cloth bag based on the intended strength of the described container.
4) The term "perfume" was interpreted to exclude "
The document discusses several equitable doctrines including conversion, election, satisfaction, and performance. The doctrine of conversion provides that equity treats property as if it is in the form intended by the owner, such as considering money directed to purchase land as the land itself. The doctrines of election and satisfaction deal with situations where a person receives a benefit from a will but is also subject to an associated obligation. The doctrine of performance allows an act other than what was originally required to be viewed as fulfilling an obligation.
This document discusses various aids that judges use when interpreting statutes, including both intrinsic (internal) aids found within the statute as well as extrinsic (external) aids outside the statute.
Some key intrinsic aids discussed are other provisions and context within the act, the title, preamble, headings, marginal notes, provisos, definitions, exceptions, schedules, and illustrations. External aids include parliamentary history, historical facts, subsequent developments, reference to other statutes, contemporary opinion, policy behind the act, precedent, and dictionaries.
The document provides examples of different intrinsic aids like definitions, exceptions, and illustrations used in the Indian Penal Code to help interpret provisions. It emphasizes that the intention of the legislature and circumstances around an
Maxims of Equity and Their Applications in BangladeshPreeti Sikder
Class Lecture Compilation from the course Principles of Equity, Trust and Roman Law
Learning Outcome:
Students will be :
- able to identify the areas of application for major equitable maxims,
- aware about the application opportunities of equitable maxims in Bangladeshi Laws
The document discusses key concepts and terminology related to civil procedure in India according to the Civil Procedure Code of 1908. It defines important legal terms like cause of action, judgement, decree, jurisdiction, res judicata, and discovery. It also outlines the various stages of civil proceedings, including institution of a suit, appearance of parties, remedies, and discovery processes.
This document discusses various rules of statutory interpretation used in legal systems, including the literal rule, golden rule, mischief rule, and purposive rule. It provides more detail on the mischief rule, explaining that it looks at the "mischief" or wrong that a statute is intended to correct in order to discover Parliament's intention. The mischief rule was established in Heydon's Case from 1584. The document also summarizes the 1874 case Gorris v Scott, where the court used the mischief rule to determine that a statute requiring animal pens on ships was intended to prevent disease, not protect against property loss.
This document provides guidance on finding various types of public international law resources such as treaties, case law, UN materials, and customary law. It discusses tools for locating multilateral treaties from the 1920s onward, including subscription databases and free websites. For treaty status information, it recommends the United Nations website and the Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General database. International law reports, cases from international courts, and UN publications are also outlined. Encyclopedias, journals, news sources, and other reference materials are highlighted to aid research.
Cross Border Laws in Business and their Implications Chandandeep Singh
Should Canadian or American multinationals (MNCs) be held accountable in Canada or the USA for the human rights violations that they commit abroad? Why or why not? Still Thinking. Read the document Illustrated with examples.
This document is an issue of the Westlaw Journal Environmental, which provides news, analysis, and commentary on environmental law and litigation. The issue includes the following articles and summaries:
- A federal appeals court upholds a $160 million judgment against the Department of Energy for breaching its promise to accept nuclear waste from energy companies.
- A commentary discusses seven common mistakes in environmental due diligence for commercial real estate transactions, including failing to conduct due diligence early, relying on outdated information, overlooking state-specific requirements, and failing to obtain cost estimates for mitigating risks.
- Another commentary addresses analyzing secondary and cumulative environmental impacts under various federal statutes to assess environmental damage in natural resource permitting cases.
On June 21, 2016, United States District Judge Scott Skavdahl granted BakerHostetler’s petition for review of final agency action and declared the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) hydraulic fracturing rule unlawful. The court’s judgment sets aside BLM’s hydraulic fracturing rule.
This document discusses potential legal liability arising from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. It outlines various environmental laws that could apply including the Oil Pollution Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, and others. It examines which parties may be considered responsible under these statutes, such as BP as operator, Transocean as rig owner, and Halliburton as contractor. The document also reviews elements of liability, available damages, and penalties under these laws, which could total in the billions of dollars depending on whether gross negligence or willful misconduct is found.
International environmental law emerged in the 1960s as global ecological degradation increased. It includes treaties, conventions, and agreements between states addressing issues like pollution, climate change, and biodiversity. While these laws aim to slow environmental damage, widespread degradation continues. International environmental law faces challenges of uneven state compliance and lack of enforcement. Improving compliance with existing treaties through sanctions and support for developing states may help strengthen these laws.
The Colorado trial court dismissed a class action lawsuit brought by residents of Battlement Mesa, CO attempting to stop natural gas development using fracking in their community. The court rejected the residents' novel legal theory of "anticipatory nuisance", which would have allowed claims to be brought now for potential future harms from fracking rather than requiring injuries to actually occur. Dismissal of the case represents a setback for plaintiffs pursuing this strategy to facilitate future fracking claims.
This summarizes a document reviewing environmental law cases from 2009-2010. It discusses three cases:
1) Fresh Meadow Food Serv., LLC v. RB 175Corp. upheld a RICO claim against a defendant who concealed underground storage tanks and contaminated soil when selling a property.
2) Wickens v. Shell Oil Co. addressed recoverable attorney fees under Indiana's Underground Storage Tank Act.
3) Evansville Greenway & Remediation Trust v. S. Ind. Gas & Elec. Co. concerned the common interest privilege and apportionment of liability under CERCLA. The court applied the privilege to communications between parties working to remediate contaminated sites. It also found CERCLA
This document provides an overview of environmental law in the United States. It discusses the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 to protect human health and the environment. It then summarizes several key federal environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. It also discusses the role of state agencies in implementing federal environmental programs and regulating pollution at the state level.
Climate Change Litigation (Part 1)
I. Introduction
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
found in its latest assessment report that climate
patterns have changed significantly in the 20th
century and the second half of the century brought
the warmest years on record.1 The causes of climate
change are largely anthropogenic, leading many
environmental groups to call on governments to
tackle these causes. As some effects of climate
change are already noticeable, such as increased
coastal hazards, adaptive measures are also needed.
A comprehensive and action-forcing interna-
tional treaty, ratified by all the major contributors
to global warming, is regarded as the preferable
choice to address the global warming phenomenon,
as collective action taken by all nation states is what
is required in order to meaningfully combat climate
change.2 However, international negotiations in
this field are not advancing, thus presenting litiga-
tion as an attractive path, despite some drawbacks.
While litigation might eventually force govern-
ments to take some action,3 it might also mean that
the results would be piecemeal. Ultimately, litiga-
tion is unlikely to have a great overall effect on
climate change.4 Despite this assessment of litiga-
tion, environmental groups and affected individu-
als and groups have nonetheless taken up the chal-
lenge and brought climate change-related actions
before the courts. These lawsuits have mainly,
but not solely, targeted unresponsive governments
through their agencies or departments,5 or compa-
nies that are major greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters,
such as car manufacturers or power plants.6
CCLR 1| 2011 3
Climate Change Litigation (Part 1)
Brian J. Preston*
In the absence of an international treaty to address climate change, litigation provides
an alternative path to encourage mitigation of the causes or redress for the effects of
climate change. This article focuses on causes of action that have been used, or could be
used, to litigate issues relating to climate change. Part I explores how plaintiffs at the
national level have brought private law causes of action in tort (public nuisance, negli-
gence, civil conspiracy, misrepresentation) and under trade practices legislation. Part II,
to be published in the next issue of this Journal, outlines how public law causes of action
in administrative law (merits review, civil enforcement and judicial review proceedings)
or constitutional law (enforcement of a constitutional right) have been used domestically
and in a range of international fora including the International Court of Justice, the
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea or regional human rights courts.
* Chief Judge, Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.
This paper was delivered to “Climate Change Governance after
Copenhagen” Conference organised by Faculty of Law, The
University of Hong Kong and Faculty of Laws, University College
London, 4 November 2010, Hong Kong. The pa.
The Supreme Court of Colorado ruled that Summit County's ordinance banning the use of chemicals like cyanide in mining operations was preempted by the state's Mined Land Reclamation Act. The Act gave the state Mined Land Reclamation Board authority to authorize and regulate the use of toxic chemicals in mining. Summit County's ordinance improperly displaced this authority granted to the state board.
Investment Rules in Trade Agreements: Korea-U.S. FTA and BeyondInstPolicyStudies
This document summarizes investment rules in US trade agreements like the Korea-US FTA and discusses some controversial cases where corporations have sued governments using these rules. It also addresses arguments commonly made in support of the current rules and responses to these arguments. Some key points are:
- The rules allow foreign investors to sue governments in international tribunals for actions that reduce investment value and seek massive compensation payments.
- This has put a "chilling effect" on responsible policymaking in areas like health, environment and economic development.
- The document discusses some cases where corporations have sued using these rules to challenge measures like cigarette packaging restrictions, mining permit denials, and environmental bans.
- It argues the foreign investment boom
This document summarizes 5 court cases related to environmental law:
1. Massachusetts v. EPA involved Massachusetts suing the EPA for failing to regulate vehicle emissions in response to rising sea levels damaging the state's coast.
2. Sierra Club v. Morton concerned Disney's plan to build a ski resort in Sequoia National Forest, which the Sierra Club tried to stop.
3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill was the first case interpreting the Endangered Species Act, and involved blocking construction of a dam to protect the snail darter fish.
4. Juliana v. United States was a youth lawsuit asserting that government actions caused environmental changes violating their constitutional rights.
5. Lu
Topic UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S ROLE AND POSITION ON MOVING ISRA.docxturveycharlyn
Topic: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S ROLE AND POSITION ON MOVING ISRAEL’S CAPITAL
4 pages double spaced
Political Studies: Outline
First section: Topic
1. Paper topic: Write a short paragraph describing your topic. Be very specific.
2. Thesis statement: Write a clear thesis statement about your paper topic.
Second Section: The paper outline
1. Introduction: Outline what your argument in your paper is going to be in a paragraph
2. Section (#): briefly outline what each section of your paper will be about.
· Include your academic citations in their respective sections
· Explain how you will use them in your arguments in one or two sentences
· You should have as many sections in your outline as you expect to have in your paper.
3. Conclusion.
Things you should include in your outline:
1. Specifics on your topic. The more detail you provide the better your grade will be
2. At least six academic sources that are relevant to your topic as well as an explanation of how you will use them. (APA)
Holloway
Canada’s Need to Take Ownersh*t of its Role in Space Exploration
A short paper on international space law
Introduction/Issues
A frozen turd ball was ejected from our orbiting space station and struck a foreign state’s spy satellite. The satellite was knocked out of orbit and crashed to Earth. The foreign state now demands reparations from us. This paper will survey the legal regime for the use of space and states’ obligations with respect to debris causing damage to other objects in space. Then, this paper will analyze the current situation to assess our options for response. This paper concludes that we should pay reparations to the foreign state and develop technologies to reduce our production of dangerous debris in space.
Rules
Given that humanity gained access to space relatively recently, and only a limited number of states actually participate in space exploration, international space law is still in its infancy. Although states have jurisdiction over the airspace immediately above their territory, outer space is understood as a ‘res communis’, meaning that none of it can form part of a state’s sovereign territory.[footnoteRef:1] The Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies entered into force in 1967 and forms the basis of international space law.[footnoteRef:2] 103 states, including Canada, have ratified the treaty and another 25 states are signatories.[footnoteRef:3] Article III notes the parties’ desires to promote peace, security, cooperation and understanding with regards to the use and development of space. Article VIII specifies that states maintain jurisdiction over whatever objects or personnel they send into space. [1: Currie, John H. et al, International Law: Doctrine, Practice and Theory, 2nd ed (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2014) at 466. ] [2: Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities o ...
When Do Gas Drilling Bans Violate the Constitution of the United StatesKenneth Kamlet
An analysis of whether and when bans or moratoria on unconventional gas drilling and support activities, as practiced in New York by the State (de facto) and numerous localities, violate the "dormant" commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Environmental Pollution and Common Law Remedies.pdfAnupamaKumari63
This document discusses common law remedies for environmental pollution, focusing on nuisance, trespass, negligence, and strict liability. It provides an overview of each cause of action and relevant case law examples. Some key points:
- Nuisance is the deepest common law principle for environmental protection. It can be public or private and remedies include damages, injunctions, or operational controls. Reasonableness and foreseeability are important factors.
- Trespass requires intentional physical invasion of property. It provides advantages over nuisance like longer statutes of limitation. Case law established that airborne particles can constitute trespass.
- Negligence requires a duty of care and breach that causes reasonably foreseeable injury. It can also
This document provides summaries of four environmental lawsuits:
1) Amchem Products Inc v British Columbia concerned asbestos lawsuits filed in Texas that were blocked by a BC court's ruling on forum non-conveniens.
2) Compagnie Francaise de Navigation concerned a Louisiana quarantine law challenged for infringing on interstate commerce and foreign treaties.
3) PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County involved hydroelectric dam permitting and required stream flows to protect salmon under the Clean Water Act.
4) Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference established the right of environmental groups to participate in regulatory proceedings that may affect their special interests in aesthetics, conservation, and recreation.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
1. INTRODUCTION
One of the most cited and fundamental cases for international
environmental law started as a local issue regarding two small
towns and one smelting plant. Northport is a town in Stevens
County in Washington, United States. Trail is a town in British
Columbia, Canada approximately twenty miles north of Northport
across the border.
The Trail smelter dispute illustrates the ever present battle of big
business vs. the working man and corporate power vs. grassroots
organization. It pits environmental protection against economic
profits.
Perhaps most importantly it challenged legislators to figure out
how to achieve sovereignty among two nations, one of which
requested their right to pollute for the purpose of economic
development, the other defending its right not to be harmed by a
foreign nation.
THE TRAIL SMELTER CASE
[US VS. CANADA]
2. FACTS OF THE CASE
The United States took Canada to court for violating their
sovereignty as a nation and the resulting decision of the court
established fundamental principles for international environmental
law.
During the early 20th century a Canadian smelter company was
operating in Trail, British Columbia along the Columbia River
which flows from Canada across the border to Washington State in
the United States of America.
Here a rural community of farmers existed who claimed damages
from the waste emitted by the smelter. The Canadian company
that smelted zinc and lead was emitting sulfur dioxide which
caused injury to plant life, forest trees, soil, and crop yields in
Washington State.
The United States charged Canada for these injuries and the case
was referred to the International Joint Commission, a bilateral
tribunal that oversees issues regarding the two countries.
3. ISSUE OF THE CASE
ISSUE:
Is it the responsibility of the State to protect to
other states against harmful acts by individuals
from within its jurisdiction at all times?
Yes. It is the responsibility of the State to
protect other states against harmful act by
individuals from within its jurisdiction at all times.
No state has the right to use or permit the use of
the territory in a manner as to cause injury by
fumes in or to the territory of another or the
properties or persons therein as stipulated under
the United States laws and the principles of
international law.
4. RULE OF LAW
There is an International obligation not to cause trans -
boundary environmental injuries.
States may be enjoined to take measures to prevent the
repetition of environmental injuries for which they would be
responsible.
The Trial Smelter Arbitration has certain difficulties in being
treated as a precedent for a “no harm” rule or a rule of strict
liability [as an accurate statement of International law]
US Supreme court has said that states have the right to use
resources how it wants, but has to stop when it starts to
infringing the rights of others states to use their environment.
5. APPLICATION OF LEGALITY
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Article 5
Article 6
Article 7
Article 8
Article 9
Article 10
Article 11
Article 12
Article 13
Article 14
After having communicated with each other their full powers,
found in good and due form ,they agreed upon the following
articles . It shall be discussed elaborately:
6. CONCLUSION
1]In this case Canada was held liable to the United states for the damages and injuries done
by fumes carried by the winds from a privately owned company of the Smelter in Canada and
was required to prevent such damages in future . The Smelter shall pay US $78,000 for
compensation.
2]The tribunal found it unnecessary to decide whether the question should be answered on
the basis of United States Law or the International Law, since the law followed between the
states of the United states in the manner of air pollution, is in conformity with the general
rules of International Law.
MEMBERS OF GROUP 1
PRESENTERS:
Jayasurya
Keerthana
Jayasalini
Keshav Priya
G.Jeyashree
Jegan Kumar
MONITORS:
Joshikha
Kaviya
D.Jayasree
RESEARCHERS:
Jayaprakash
Karthick Raja
Jetlin Kala
Kanimozhi
Kavitha
Jannath
SLIDE:
Janani