Ibrahim Mahamoud 
Alomari 
AAPS-Toronto 
Sept. 2014
NPS National Pharmacovigilance System 
In Portugal, the National Pharmacovigilance System 
(NPS) was created in 1992, completing during this year 
22 years of existence
Having been established in a centralized manner, it 
soon became aware that its geographic 
decentralization would bring advantages in terms of 
proximity of the System to health professionals as well 
as the involvement of the universities.
The NPS currently has four regional 
pharmacovigilance centres , which cover the entire 
Portugal, which became centers of scientific vocation, 
carrying out pharmacoepidemiological studies in 
the area of drug safety. 
To insure proper collection, processing and evaluation 
of spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions 
(ADRs)
Over these 20 years, the NPS has been adapting to the 
EU requirements in the area of pharmacovigilance, 
and is currently a mature and well implemented 
system, with the objectives of the evaluation of the 
safety profile of marketed drugs and triggering of 
actions to reduce the risk of these drugs.
From the second half of 2012, implementation of recent 
European legislation on Pharmacovigilance, published in 
December 2010. 
http://www.pharmacovigilance2012.nl/about/ 
Among other changes, there is the possibility for 
consumers to report their suspicious of ADR directly 
to the NPS (exclusive, so far, to health professionals). 
This work aims to be a reflection about the evolution of the 
National Pharmacovigilance System and its growing 
importance in the protection of public health.
European legislation on Pharmacovigilance, 
published in December 2010. 
It aims to better protect and promote public health by: 
I. Increasing public involvement in pharmacovigilance. 
II. Increasing transparency. 
III. Improving communication of decisions and reasons of 
decisions. 
IV. Providing a legal basis for more proactive 
pharmacovigilance. 
V. Simplifying reporting rules for e.g. spontaneous adverse 
drug reactions. 
VI. Improving pharmacovigilance efficiency.
Reference 
ActaMed Port. 2012 Jul-Aug;25(4):241-9. Epub 2012 
Aug 31. 
[The Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System]. 
[Article in Portuguese] 
Herdeiro MT1, Ferreira M, Ribeiro-Vaz I, Junqueira 
Polónia J, Costa-Pereira A.
Thank you

Pharmacovigilance System in the Portuguese

  • 1.
    Ibrahim Mahamoud Alomari AAPS-Toronto Sept. 2014
  • 2.
    NPS National PharmacovigilanceSystem In Portugal, the National Pharmacovigilance System (NPS) was created in 1992, completing during this year 22 years of existence
  • 3.
    Having been establishedin a centralized manner, it soon became aware that its geographic decentralization would bring advantages in terms of proximity of the System to health professionals as well as the involvement of the universities.
  • 4.
    The NPS currentlyhas four regional pharmacovigilance centres , which cover the entire Portugal, which became centers of scientific vocation, carrying out pharmacoepidemiological studies in the area of drug safety. To insure proper collection, processing and evaluation of spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs)
  • 5.
    Over these 20years, the NPS has been adapting to the EU requirements in the area of pharmacovigilance, and is currently a mature and well implemented system, with the objectives of the evaluation of the safety profile of marketed drugs and triggering of actions to reduce the risk of these drugs.
  • 6.
    From the secondhalf of 2012, implementation of recent European legislation on Pharmacovigilance, published in December 2010. http://www.pharmacovigilance2012.nl/about/ Among other changes, there is the possibility for consumers to report their suspicious of ADR directly to the NPS (exclusive, so far, to health professionals). This work aims to be a reflection about the evolution of the National Pharmacovigilance System and its growing importance in the protection of public health.
  • 7.
    European legislation onPharmacovigilance, published in December 2010. It aims to better protect and promote public health by: I. Increasing public involvement in pharmacovigilance. II. Increasing transparency. III. Improving communication of decisions and reasons of decisions. IV. Providing a legal basis for more proactive pharmacovigilance. V. Simplifying reporting rules for e.g. spontaneous adverse drug reactions. VI. Improving pharmacovigilance efficiency.
  • 8.
    Reference ActaMed Port.2012 Jul-Aug;25(4):241-9. Epub 2012 Aug 31. [The Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System]. [Article in Portuguese] Herdeiro MT1, Ferreira M, Ribeiro-Vaz I, Junqueira Polónia J, Costa-Pereira A.
  • 9.